It's obvious that the plantiff was smitten with the defendant so much that he loaned him the money. But the judge confused me with his ruling because I've seen him allowed tape recorded messages that were unbeknownst to the OP in his courtroom before plenty of times. So idk what made him switch up here.
It's funny how people will borrow money from you then all of a sudden feel threatened and leave but they didn't feel that way before they took the money!!
JM was looking to give this case away to the defendant for some reason, he was badgering the plaintiff the whole case then tried to give a statement supporting him being gay. JM first tried to to give it away saying if the mother didn’t say 100% she supported him in being right about the money then tried with the did she give permission and he even had a statement saying he could use the tape……..with all that said it didn’t even matter if she knew before or after because Alabama state law is only a one party state which means she doesn’t have to know he’s recording her or get permission. JM got this case WRONG! 🤨🤷🏽♂️
@Shanell Wyche Alabama I’m which state they’re in is in fact a ONE party state which means you don’t have to tell another person shit……..the rulling was wrong!
@Shanell Wyche not true!!!!! It all depends on the state that you are in while recording….. he was in the state of Alabama which is a 1 party consent state meaning only one party involved in the conversation has to consent to the recording…. This means that he was well within the law to record that conversation without her knowing that he was recording…… also meaning he had no burden to proof that she knew he was recording in court that day….. Judge Mathis really fumbled this one!!!
I think they both knew what time it was and had an agenda. The plaintiff saw an opportunity to get turnt out and the defendant saw a someone he could use.
@@terry4161 smh...I was once like you... God's commandments or man's ways, I would have to ask if neither of those wrote anything in the book why do you mention them as if they are exist 🤔.. you either believe in them or you don't there is no in between. Ijss
@@soulcityoriginal4270 your thinking is limited to the Bible. And if that’s the case god loves all as it is stated. You have sinned in your life and are subject to judgement and punishment. Straight people are not exempt but pick and choose which sins are worse in order to cover up their own evil. The Ten Commandments does not includes homosexuality but you feel it necessary to discuss it. You are not the authority, you do not hold the power to judge and for that you will be punished. Hypocrites face condemnation last time I read the Bible. It’s funny that Bible thumpers feel they are exempt, righteous and walk on water.
"I was confused and I could be bi" "You're confused on whether he owes you rent so you told him bi" LMAO 🤣🤣🤣 the Judge always knows how to flip it for a laugh 😁
I feel sorry for the plaintiff ... was simply made used of by the defendant ( who consciously was well aware that the plaintiff was infactuated with him) and for the defendant to get a free ride for the loans given and the rentals owed ... shame on him 😞
Bro the dude knew he had no chance and kept pursuing something he'd never get lol so what did he do? Resort to giving him money to win him over once he seen tht it wasn't gonna work then he tried to blast him national TV and made himself look even more like a fool😂😂 u guys rlly are pathetic
Mathis was wrong in that judgement. He often allows his bias to get in the way of his thought process. Judy would never. The defendant took advantage of the plaintiff and should be held responsible or go ask your "boyfriend" for the $3000
Mathis can be a butt hole sometimes!! If he like a certain side he will find something wrong with other side. The angle this time was ( did she know you were taping?) plaintiff should have won. The defendant said he owes him. Case closed!
The guy should have just paid the man for the loan, and just leave if he felt uncomfortable in the plantiff's place. I don't think the judge's decision was fair in this case. The defendant strategically used and took advantage of the plantiff's confusion. Not Fair!
Hmmmm, I don't know who to believe both seem to be deceiving. The plaintiff paid for "Infatuation" and the defendant was a "User" that ate off what he was fed until it was time to "Give it up"that's my just my opinion.
If y’all believe these two didn’t sleep together than idk what to say. Hunny, he decided to move into a 1 bed room apartment with an openly gay male who was infatuated. Chile cheese 😭😭
This was 1 of the funniest I've seen in a while,,, I love the serious talks because I learn a lot but the ones that make you laugh out loud is priceless 😂 🤣 😆
People who cheat others out of money like the defendant did never get ahead. It’s also disrespectful to move into someone’s house and have sex I. Their living room. That is something you discuss or go to your spouses house to do if you don’t have a room in the home you’re staying in.
Bro stop we all know why the plaintiff sued the defendant he tried to win him over with money and it didn't work lol and it got blasted right bck in his face stop with the bull
It is clear that both were being deceitful so it is a lesson learned for both. Especially considering there was no evidence. I feel bad for the little guy and hope he figures things out. He is borderline stalker level.
I kind of feel like the defendant knew the plaintiff liked him in that way and used him. I feel like nice people get used more and not loved more 😢 🤦🏾♂️
JM really got on my nerves with this case! First of all, he knew what the plaintiff meant when he said “This is how he paid me back”. We all know that JM had a brother that was gay. But, he really be doing extra when gay males bring cases. And the comparison between being black & gay is nowhere near the same! I wish people would stop it…🙄 Blessings to this guy bc he doesn’t have his family that it seems he misses…And people bring recordings all of the time…but I guess he wanted to show equality with this case…
Yeah, Judge was so busy talking over them too. I don't think he understood some of what the Defendant was trying to explain to him, especially when the Plaintiff said, he was confused. Then he says, "Let's Move On"
Yeah he is SO biased for gay males on here. As a judge,he is supposed to be impartial. I guess this defendant reminded him of his brother,because he was unnecessarily harsh on the plaintiff.
Comparing being black and being gay is 100% okay because they face the same discrimination and non acceptance. I wish non gay people would be less ignorant when it comes to topics like this.
Alabama is a 1 party consent state, his recorded convos are admissible. But i dont think the convos were required, JM granted it but the obsessive behavior constituted harassment
@@Orlandoloc83 maybe you need to rewatch this. Judge asked for evidence, he provided the evidence then jm found an excuse to dismiss the case! JM didn't think he was going to have evidence, he was planning to dismiss his case anyway. As I stated Jm be in his feelings 💯. Goodbye ✌🏽😐
@@kaytee4088 just looking at u u look slow lml he forced the mom to say it’s not harass clearly u was watching the show on ur cassette player vhs right lml
@@Orlandoloc83 no you're the slow one!!! I'm not about to argue with a internet thug 🤣 who won't show their face but wants to judge mine 😉. They were on the phone, if the conversation was forced she would've been hung up on him. Find something else to do besides scrolling through comments, harassing people and being a internet thug! You're bored and miserable, looking for attention 😐✌🏽😶
Damn the plaintiff seemed like he had a good heart… this is a weird case and the after the case situation was weird!! I’m not sure who was telling the truth
Lol confessing his love for that clown! He should've jumped across Doyle and hit him on the mouth about his money... then slapped that messy bf just because!
I've been watching J.M. since the 90ty's, he is fun fun now, but also Cocky and unfair in some cases. The defendant owed him that money regardless of the phone taping two seperate incidents.
The plaintiff looks like if one of the Cabbage Patch Kids was given a magical elixir to drink to turn him into a real life dimwitted fool all grown up.
I seriously love how open judge Mathis is. Good lord; every black father should learn from this man. These guys lifestyle has nothing to do with him but he gone get the tea hunny 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭✌🏾🤪😂😂🤗
It’s a 3rd party recording and certain states don’t allow you to record another persons without expressed consent on tape. I believe he loaned him money but I also believe he tried to force a relationship on him.
But how can the son collect a judgment on his mother being harassed. I think Mathis was wrong on that part. The plaintiff didn’t harass the defendant. Judge Judy would never.
@@MaryJane-ku2bn It's harassment of the plaintiff.. there's been a bunch of time when someone on the show has called the person's job in attempt to collect on money. Judge Mathis usually rules in favor of harassment when someone starts involving other people in collection of a debt who have nothing to do with it.
This case was a mess! The Plaintiff knows he's into guys and once a man is willing to hold his ankles for another man, he's STRAIGHT-UP gay. The Defendant knew the Plaintiff had the hots for him and he swindled him out of his money.
Why does it matter the the plaintiff recorded the defendant's mom agreeing with him. How did he "decieve" the defendant's mother into admitting that the defendant owed him money???
The plaintiff said he was coming out on national TV and his family knew nothing about it, then said he will change his number and they’ve disowned him. And he was definitely trying to “buy” the defendant. The defendant knew the plaintiff was attracted to him and took advantage of him. I don’t feel sorry for either one.
The plaintiff knew darn well he wanted the defendant and thought he had a chance by letting him move in for free. The defendant was using that against him, too, and was a moocher. It was very weird and they need to go their separate ways.
I met the defendant Jeffrey when I was in college years ago. he lived an hour and a half from my college town. he hit me up online and we chatted. I met him once. he seemed like an okay guy and I thought he was really handsome. we chatted a bit and only met once. he was a tad bit flaky so it didn't go anywhere. the plaintiff I met in passing at a party someone I knew threw.
the gag is I know two other gay guys from that time in college who were on Judge Judy and one of them was a scammer and thief. the plantiff, defendent and these two I just referenced above were mutual friends on Facebook 😂😂😂
He knew he liked him… never take money from a person who likes you, because they will feel used. Ya know. And he also knew, so why do it. You thought he was just going to.. let it go, but no.. u in court
It depends on what state they’re in for the recording to be used as proof. If it’s a one party state, than the recording is admissible. If it’s a two party state, the recording is inadmissible; therefore it can’t be used as evidence.
Poor guy he loved and was definitely nose wide open for this guy and was willing to risk it all I believe the Def knew how the Plan felt and took advantage of it
JM was looking to give this case away to the defendant for some reason, he was badgering the plaintiff the whole case then tried to give a statement supporting him being gay. JM first tried to to give it away saying if the mother didn’t say 100% she supported him in being right about the money then tried with the did she give permission and he even had a statement saying he could use the tape……..with all that said it didn’t even matter if she knew before or after because Alabama state law is only a one party state which means she doesn’t have to know he’s recording her or get permission. JM got this case WRONG! 🤨🤷🏽♂️
Huh? The defendant used this dude and basically ran game on him. He's a scumbag for that, and his "boyfriend" is a fool too. His actions are a reflection of his character, so why be involved with someone like that. The defendant and his dude are messy! If you borrow money from someone, its only right that you pay them back!
These weird people...why do they think it's normal proclaiming to the world their sexuality preference...you don't see heterosexuals walking around publicly discussing their sexuality...rappers are weird also.
well obviously it was to give context to the nature of their relationship and it was relevant to the case. do u complain when 99% of all other cases refer to husbands/wives boy- and girlfriends?
I believe the defendant about what went down between him and the plaintiff. And the plaintiff was wrong to call his mother like that. That was underhanded and low down dirty.
Judge Mathis be bias sometimes it must depends on his mood ion like that tho lol..cause I done seen cases he wouldn’t considered that as harassment..it would just be someone trying to collect their money smh!!
It's obvious that the plantiff was smitten with the defendant so much that he loaned him the money. But the judge confused me with his ruling because I've seen him allowed tape recorded messages that were unbeknownst to the OP in his courtroom before plenty of times. So idk what made him switch up here.
I agree sis 💯
Depends on the stated laws
@@nikkif9873 It’s the “sis” for me 😭😂
3rd party not included in the case
True.Ive also seen JM accept recordings..so why is this different and not accepted..it's so unfair that the plaintiff did not get his money....sad
It's funny how people will borrow money from you then all of a sudden feel threatened and leave but they didn't feel that way before they took the money!!
True!!
Add the plaintiff asking for the money back is harassing the defendant
Awe I feel for the plaintiff. He seems so sweet. I hope everything goes well for him.
Stop it he's weird and he did it to himself
No matter the defendant still owed him the money the decision should have been in the plaintiffs favor
I completely agree with you. I don’t know what happened with the Judge on this one 🤔
JM was looking to give this case away to the defendant for some reason, he was badgering the plaintiff the whole case then tried to give a statement supporting him being gay. JM first tried to to give it away saying if the mother didn’t say 100% she supported him in being right about the money then tried with the did she give permission and he even had a statement saying he could use the tape……..with all that said it didn’t even matter if she knew before or after because Alabama state law is only a one party state which means she doesn’t have to know he’s recording her or get permission. JM got this case WRONG! 🤨🤷🏽♂️
@Shanell Wyche Alabama I’m which state they’re in is in fact a ONE party state which means you don’t have to tell another person shit……..the rulling was wrong!
@@miamimay9200 crybaby Mathis strikes again
@Shanell Wyche not true!!!!! It all depends on the state that you are in while recording….. he was in the state of Alabama which is a 1 party consent state meaning only one party involved in the conversation has to consent to the recording…. This means that he was well within the law to record that conversation without her knowing that he was recording…… also meaning he had no burden to proof that she knew he was recording in court that day….. Judge Mathis really fumbled this one!!!
JM was on some BS with this ruling…🤦🏾♂️
It’s not some state the person you recording has to give consent
@@ElLiSe.. plaintiff said she did.
@@stumack9755 after the fact
Agreed
I think they both knew what time it was and had an agenda. The plaintiff saw an opportunity to get turnt out and the defendant saw a someone he could use.
“Opportunity to get turnt out”NO 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Bottom line
@@tjneverdefeated4394 not bottom line. I just died 😭😭😭 he definitely a bttm hunty
@@TaRonThomasTv definitely a bottom 😂😂😂
Currently binge watching from 🏴
Why was I never aware of this judge? He is amazing
Welcome to the JM fam! 🥳
Welcome! Love JudgeM
@@minae9935 awww thanks ❤️❤️
Sorry, but what flag is that?
@@TopherGrant it’s England 🏴 then we’ve 🇬🇧 for the United Kingdom ❤️
That's unfortunate that his family disowned him because he sought to determine his sexuality 😔
He's from Alabama. You can just imagine how "religious" his parents are.
How so, that's against God's law, they sided with God
@@soulcityoriginal4270 that’s against man’s law who wrote the Bible. God and Jesus did not write anything in the Bible. That’s a fact.
@@terry4161 smh...I was once like you... God's commandments or man's ways, I would have to ask if neither of those wrote anything in the book why do you mention them as if they are exist 🤔.. you either believe in them or you don't there is no in between. Ijss
@@soulcityoriginal4270 your thinking is limited to the Bible. And if that’s the case god loves all as it is stated. You have sinned in your life and are subject to judgement and punishment. Straight people are not exempt but pick and choose which sins are worse in order to cover up their own evil. The Ten Commandments does not includes homosexuality but you feel it necessary to discuss it. You are not the authority, you do not hold the power to judge and for that you will be punished. Hypocrites face condemnation last time I read the Bible. It’s funny that Bible thumpers feel they are exempt, righteous and walk on water.
That's not cool ..he know he barrowed that money now he doesn't want to pay it back ..money and friendships do not mix
I've been down that path many times with so called family and friends...I'm to the point now nobody gets my money but me....lol
**Borrowed
@@CDUBXGOTXSWAGG thank you for the correction
Plaintiff was interested in the defendant and the defendant didn’t want him so the plaintiff got messy.
Good morning everyone! I hope everyone is having a great day! 🙂
Thank u Sis❣️ Very sweet of u! Hoping ur day is Fantastic🙏🏽
Peace and Blessings To You All !!
🙏🏾❤️🙏🏾
This is one strange case
This judgement was so unfair
No it wasn’t
I lost it when the judge asked "you didn't ask him to put it away?!"🤣
I thought the defendant's witness was me for a second. Had me questioning if i went on the show and forgot lol
😭 Lmao
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂🤣😄
I'm dead lmaooo.
🤣🤣🤣🤣
"I was confused and I could be bi"
"You're confused on whether he owes you rent so you told him bi"
LMAO 🤣🤣🤣 the Judge always knows how to flip it for a laugh 😁
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
I feel sorry for the plaintiff ... was simply made used of by the defendant ( who consciously was well aware that the plaintiff was infactuated with him) and for the defendant to get a free ride for the loans given and the rentals owed ... shame on him 😞
Bro the dude knew he had no chance and kept pursuing something he'd never get lol so what did he do? Resort to giving him money to win him over once he seen tht it wasn't gonna work then he tried to blast him national TV and made himself look even more like a fool😂😂 u guys rlly are pathetic
How do you walk in on someone in the shower 2-3 times? I guess the water wasn’t running? Door wasn’t locked? 🤔
Some people are reckless and dont give a fuck.. especially gay men.
Mathis was wrong in that judgement. He often allows his bias to get in the way of his thought process. Judy would never. The defendant took advantage of the plaintiff and should be held responsible or go ask your "boyfriend" for the $3000
EXACTLY, go ask your messy a** broke bf!
the plaintiff clearly has issues, but Mathis judgement was too harsh. the conversation with his mom didnt amount to harassment
Ive even seen JM dismiss harassment claims against someone's mother saying it didnt count
Facts!!!
Mathis can be a butt hole sometimes!! If he like a certain side he will find something wrong with other side. The angle this time was ( did she know you were taping?) plaintiff should have won. The defendant said he owes him. Case closed!
& plaintiff said the mom knew she was being taped.
The guy should have just paid the man for the loan, and just leave if he felt uncomfortable in the plantiff's place. I don't think the judge's decision was fair in this case. The defendant strategically used and took advantage of the plantiff's confusion. Not Fair!
JM so stupid! He denied those loans because of a tape! I can’t stand him and his emotionally charged judgments
Agree
The plaintiff insisted the tape would help is case...played himself
Hmmmm, I don't know who to believe both seem to be deceiving. The plaintiff paid for "Infatuation" and the defendant was a "User" that ate off what he was fed until it was time to "Give it up"that's my just my opinion.
Right. It’s giving “I wanna sugar daddy but I ain’t giving up no sugar”.
Well said
I agree. You can tell the plaintiff is not his type.
@@scottrogue946 At all
If y’all believe these two didn’t sleep together than idk what to say. Hunny, he decided to move into a 1 bed room apartment with an openly gay male who was infatuated. Chile cheese 😭😭
This was 1 of the funniest I've seen in a while,,, I love the serious talks because I learn a lot but the ones that make you laugh out loud is priceless 😂 🤣 😆
People who cheat others out of money like the defendant did never get ahead. It’s also disrespectful to move into someone’s house and have sex I. Their living room. That is something you discuss or go to your spouses house to do if you don’t have a room in the home you’re staying in.
Bro stop we all know why the plaintiff sued the defendant he tried to win him over with money and it didn't work lol and it got blasted right bck in his face stop with the bull
the defendant is a crook
he steals @ walmart.
This was wrong jm must be on his period. He owe the young man the money. So what he taped his mom
Judge Mathis face when he said “he jealous because he can’t be with me”
Lol haha. The plaintiff is so adorable though😙😙😙
I agree
It is clear that both were being deceitful so it is a lesson learned for both. Especially considering there was no evidence. I feel bad for the little guy and hope he figures things out. He is borderline stalker level.
I kind of feel like the defendant knew the plaintiff liked him in that way and used him. I feel like nice people get used more and not loved more 😢 🤦🏾♂️
The Plaintiff is really pouring his heart out he gives “You” vibes 🥴
JM really got on my nerves with this case! First of all, he knew what the plaintiff meant when he said “This is how he paid me back”. We all know that JM had a brother that was gay. But, he really be doing extra when gay males bring cases. And the comparison between being black & gay is nowhere near the same! I wish people would stop it…🙄 Blessings to this guy bc he doesn’t have his family that it seems he misses…And people bring recordings all of the time…but I guess he wanted to show equality with this case…
Yeah, Judge was so busy talking over them too. I don't think he understood some of what the Defendant was trying to explain to him, especially when the Plaintiff said, he was confused. Then he says, "Let's Move On"
his son is gay too.
Yeah he is SO biased for gay males on here. As a judge,he is supposed to be impartial. I guess this defendant reminded him of his brother,because he was unnecessarily harsh on the plaintiff.
@@stumack9755 You told me something! I didn’t know that.
Comparing being black and being gay is 100% okay because they face the same discrimination and non acceptance. I wish non gay people would be less ignorant when it comes to topics like this.
Once I heard the plantiff ramble on in the beginning I knew he did whatever the defendant said he did
Alabama is a 1 party consent state, his recorded convos are admissible. But i dont think the convos were required, JM granted it but the obsessive behavior constituted harassment
Narcissistic Ways . Absolutely, 🤮
Judge was wrong for this ruling here!
Your sharing a one br. You go over your boyfriend's house or you two spilt the cost of a hotel.
This is crazy! You asked for evidence, he provides evidence then you dismiss his case. I can't stand judge Mathis, he really be in his feelings 🙄🤦
Yah so emotional he didn’t have proof he lost the case once he admit that he likes him smh
@@Orlandoloc83 maybe you need to rewatch this. Judge asked for evidence, he provided the evidence then jm found an excuse to dismiss the case! JM didn't think he was going to have evidence, he was planning to dismiss his case anyway. As I stated Jm be in his feelings 💯. Goodbye ✌🏽😐
@@kaytee4088 just looking at u u look slow lml he forced the mom to say it’s not harass clearly u was watching the show on ur cassette player vhs right lml
@@Orlandoloc83 no you're the slow one!!! I'm not about to argue with a internet thug 🤣 who won't show their face but wants to judge mine 😉. They were on the phone, if the conversation was forced she would've been hung up on him. Find something else to do besides scrolling through comments, harassing people and being a internet thug! You're bored and miserable, looking for attention 😐✌🏽😶
He should've still had to pay him his money he borrowed.
Let you get sexually harassed🤦🏾♂️🙄 I wanna hear you singing that same tune🤮🤮
Damn the plaintiff seemed like he had a good heart… this is a weird case and the after the case situation was weird!! I’m not sure who was telling the truth
Being obsessive isn’t having a “good heart” it’s being a creepy ass weirdo🤦🏾♂️
Lol confessing his love for that clown! He should've jumped across Doyle and hit him on the mouth about his money... then slapped that messy bf just because!
I believe they used each other. One used the other for money and a place to stay the other used him thinking they could mess around and have fun.
I've been watching J.M. since the 90ty's, he is fun fun now, but also Cocky and unfair in some cases. The defendant owed him that money regardless of the phone taping two seperate incidents.
The defendant knows good and well that he owes money to the plaintiff for rent, and the loan.
Baby his family already knows 😭😭
Judge Mathis Is Down Bad For This Judgement 🤦🏾♀️ He Know Damn Well ….. 🙄
The plaintiff looks like if one of the Cabbage Patch Kids was given a magical elixir to drink to turn him into a real life dimwitted fool all grown up.
Now Judge done used recordings before I’ve never seen him do this he should’ve granted that man his money. Just my opinion
I agree with you 100%
He did however he counter sue for harassment
The plaintiff was so sweet 💔
I seriously love how open judge Mathis is. Good lord; every black father should learn from this man. These guys lifestyle has nothing to do with him but he gone get the tea hunny 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭✌🏾🤪😂😂🤗
It’s a 3rd party recording and certain states don’t allow you to record another persons without expressed consent on tape. I believe he loaned him money but I also believe he tried to force a relationship on him.
But how can the son collect a judgment on his mother being harassed. I think Mathis was wrong on that part. The plaintiff didn’t harass the defendant. Judge Judy would never.
@@MaryJane-ku2bn It's harassment of the plaintiff.. there's been a bunch of time when someone on the show has called the person's job in attempt to collect on money. Judge Mathis usually rules in favor of harassment when someone starts involving other people in collection of a debt who have nothing to do with it.
He's gay and he's from the south...Damn...I can hear the slurs coming from his peoples mouth...smh just love your children no matter what...
This case was a mess!
The Plaintiff knows he's into guys and once a man is willing to hold his ankles for another man, he's STRAIGHT-UP gay.
The Defendant knew the Plaintiff had the hots for him and he swindled him out of his money.
It feels like JM had it out for the plaintiff from the beginning imo...I hate it when he picks sides arbitrarily.
Why does it matter the the plaintiff recorded the defendant's mom agreeing with him. How did he "decieve" the defendant's mother into admitting that the defendant owed him money???
taping could be allowed n their state.
The Plaintiff seems very smitten with the Defendant but I don’t agree with JM here, the mother didn’t seem under duress.
Exactly! The mother agreed that her son should pay...makes one wonder if her son used to doing this
The plaintiff said he was coming out on national TV and his family knew nothing about it, then said he will change his number and they’ve disowned him. And he was definitely trying to “buy” the defendant. The defendant knew the plaintiff was attracted to him and took advantage of him. I don’t feel sorry for either one.
Happy Wednesday Court Family
Jm was bugging
He’s in love and hurt that’s what it is
The defendant and the plaintiff broke even other words both lost the case.
Nothing from nothing leaves nothing!😂😂😂
The plaintiff knew darn well he wanted the defendant and thought he had a chance by letting him move in for free. The defendant was using that against him, too, and was a moocher. It was very weird and they need to go their separate ways.
Mathis 👎👎👎👎👎
People should know better than to come deal with Mathis.
This guy has a different personality from one day to the next!
"Narcistic" 🤣
Stop embarrassing Alabama!🙄
Vicky and Casey has done enough for a little while!
Facts!😩
ur pic is embarrassing
@@stumack9755 its alright for a country boy! 😉
I know right! I’m from Mobile,AL
Wayment!!! You thought you could be bisexual? By the mannerisms, I assumed that you were... Nevermind 😂😂😂
Wayment!? What does that even mean? Speak English bro. Not ebonics. You sound ridiculous. People don't even speak English anymore for goodness sake.
@@adrianprince7266 You clearly understood what was said, stop being an a** and allow people to speak the way they please..
@@adrianprince7266 Ask Bernie
I know both of these guys 😂 whew chile.. 😅
Sir I need the tea??? ☕️ 👀
I met the defendant Jeffrey when I was in college years ago. he lived an hour and a half from my college town. he hit me up online and we chatted. I met him once. he seemed like an okay guy and I thought he was really handsome. we chatted a bit and only met once. he was a tad bit flaky so it didn't go anywhere. the plaintiff I met in passing at a party someone I knew threw.
the gag is I know two other gay guys from that time in college who were on Judge Judy and one of them was a scammer and thief. the plantiff, defendent and these two I just referenced above were mutual friends on Facebook 😂😂😂
He knew he liked him… never take money from a person who likes you, because they will feel used. Ya know. And he also knew, so why do it. You thought he was just going to.. let it go, but no.. u in court
It depends on what state they’re in for the recording to be used as proof. If it’s a one party state, than the recording is admissible. If it’s a two party state, the recording is inadmissible; therefore it can’t be used as evidence.
Poor guy he loved and was definitely nose wide open for this guy and was willing to risk it all
I believe the Def knew how the Plan felt and took advantage of it
JM was looking to give this case away to the defendant for some reason, he was badgering the plaintiff the whole case then tried to give a statement supporting him being gay. JM first tried to to give it away saying if the mother didn’t say 100% she supported him in being right about the money then tried with the did she give permission and he even had a statement saying he could use the tape……..with all that said it didn’t even matter if she knew before or after because Alabama state law is only a one party state which means she doesn’t have to know he’s recording her or get permission. JM got this case WRONG! 🤨🤷🏽♂️
Ohhh somebody lime green jelly lol 😆 he thought if he let him move in he'd be his boyfriend..wrong lol
GOD said, If a man , ..... with another man, .... NO JUST KIDDING!! 😜🤪🤪😜🤪💯🙊
I clapped with this judgement, the plaintiff is an annoying mess and a liar. I believe the defendant 100%
Huh? The defendant used this dude and basically ran game on him. He's a scumbag for that, and his "boyfriend" is a fool too. His actions are a reflection of his character, so why be involved with someone like that. The defendant and his dude are messy! If you borrow money from someone, its only right that you pay them back!
He’s weird .. he need to find someone that’s also in to him not chasing someone who already has a boyfriend. He was obviously not his type either. 🤣
Dude clearly turned him out that's why he was acting like that giving him money and telling him that he still cares for him.
The plaintiff kind of looks like the Pat character from SNL. Best of luck to him.
Being in love and homeless goes crazy to me😮😅
You still trying to holla at him after you lost…. “I still care about you” please stop
JM was annoying here.... sometimes jokes are inappropriate
He called his Mom?? 😲🙄
In some states, you can record conversations. It’s called a one party state, so Judge Mathis should’ve probably checked the state they were in.
Nah this man clearly did this so he could have power over this man. I'm glad neither got anything and have to move on.
Seems bias against the plaintiff
Plantiff deserved his money smh
This was just sad..no ifs and but"s about it.
JM kill me everyone doesn't have to accept homosexuality
Frfr
or blacks...
People bring in recordings all the time (without the knowledge of being recorded) and he approved he allows it
He is very much obsessive and they both took advantage of each other smh
These weird people...why do they think it's normal proclaiming to the world their sexuality preference...you don't see heterosexuals walking around publicly discussing their sexuality...rappers are weird also.
well obviously it was to give context to the nature of their relationship and it was relevant to the case. do u complain when 99% of all other cases refer to husbands/wives boy- and girlfriends?
Present👋. Greetings from Barbados my JM peeps.
Greetings from South Africa
Can we get to the Case
I believe the defendant about what went down between him and the plaintiff. And the plaintiff was wrong to call his mother like that. That was underhanded and low down dirty.
So that don't mean he isn't responsible for paying back the money he borrowed. Tf, if someone owed you 3k you'd call their mom too lol
@@tell_em1522 only to find out if she knew his whereabouts. I wouldn't dare go as far as the plaintiff did.
I never said he wasn't responsible.
@@sweetsweet81 understood
Judge Mathis be bias sometimes it must depends on his mood ion like that tho lol..cause I done seen cases he wouldn’t considered that as harassment..it would just be someone trying to collect their money smh!!
omg..
the end. 🤦🏾♀️
I’m sorry young man.
I guess three really isn't company.
Come on girls man up lol
I completely disagree with Judge Mathis on this one. There was no evidence of harassment.
Lmaoooo poor thing wanted him so bad boy bye get over it and find another man to experiment on😩😩😩😩✌️✌️