Genious game from Stockfish! Like i said at about the game yesterday Leela's poss playstyle uses way more calculations, so its unlikely we see a Fish that gets equal good at this till better hardware arives one day, where the Fish can emulate both playstyles at the same time. Thanks Josip! You show the best AI chess matches enjoyed it a lot!
Great offensive attack from Stockfish barging in on the king side some Brilliant moves great sack and Bishop move so sharp !! Incredible after all the strategic moves winning with extra pawn Shows why Stockfish is the Best thanks Jozarov
Why don't they let computers play normal chess like humans? They can leave those positions at their home as well. Let the computers fight their way. What did the fish do in the reverse situation if each side is already playing the same position?
Because if you let them play from the beginning they will make the same moves every time, and every game wil be drawn, not interesting at all. When they played with reversed colors, stockfish deviated from leela's aproach by playing 10...Ndf6 instead of leela's 10...Nhf6, and managed to draw the game.
I ask myself, since when did you watch this videos? Have you been on an other planet the last years? Jozarov explained this issue for a thousand times in the last years, so how can it be that you still don't know this??
Umm, yes, Stonewall Dutch is worse than Leningrad Dutch, but if it takes Stockfish to put it down, I'd say Stonewall is still very much playable by humans.
I don't like so much pre-arranged moves one bit. It (also) demonstrates the inability of humans to create chess engines which can vary their moves. To the organizers: stop it. Or at least try it to minimize it to 2 moves.
No, it demonstrates the fact that engines play so much more precisely than humans, that without unbalanced openings, neither of the sides can win over the other.
What a tactical masterpiece- The fish just did not stop throwing things at leela until leela cracked. thanks Josip.
Payback for the forced draw
The fish 🔥
Genious game from Stockfish! Like i said at about the game yesterday Leela's poss playstyle uses way more calculations, so its unlikely we see a Fish that gets equal good at this till better hardware arives one day, where the Fish can emulate both playstyles at the same time. Thanks Josip! You show the best AI chess matches enjoyed it a lot!
I just got to know you are Agadmator's brother-in-law!!!
Really??!! Whaaaaat
Brought me here too!! about a year or two ago lol
Agad does people
Jozarov does Engines
He could give Jozarov some of his subscribers, of which he has almost one and a half million lol
Happy Christmas Joz, from Michael your old friend! I am still playing chess. Happy new year also to you and your family.
Thanks, you too!
Thank you very much, nice game nicer coverage 👍
Great offensive attack from Stockfish barging in on the king side some Brilliant moves great sack and Bishop move so sharp !! Incredible after all the strategic moves winning with extra pawn Shows why Stockfish is the Best thanks Jozarov
Brutal facilidad con la juega Stockfish, gracias jozarov, saludos
I hope you cover every decisive game from this 100-game match!
We want stockfish 17 vs torch
Stockfish is a tactical Monster
Unbelievable. Game 19.
Why don't they let computers play normal chess like humans? They can leave those positions at their home as well. Let the computers fight their way. What did the fish do in the reverse situation if each side is already playing the same position?
Because if you let them play from the beginning they will make the same moves every time, and every game wil be drawn, not interesting at all.
When they played with reversed colors, stockfish deviated from leela's aproach by playing 10...Ndf6 instead of leela's 10...Nhf6, and managed to draw the game.
I ask myself, since when did you watch this videos?
Have you been on an other planet the last years?
Jozarov explained this issue for a thousand times in the last years, so how can it be that you still don't know this??
they tried- 100 games, 100 draws
Umm, yes, Stonewall Dutch is worse than Leningrad Dutch, but if it takes Stockfish to put it down, I'd say Stonewall is still very much playable by humans.
I don't like so much pre-arranged moves one bit. It (also) demonstrates the inability of humans to create chess engines which can vary their moves. To the organizers: stop it. Or at least try it to minimize it to 2 moves.
Yes, in principle, but to get to a proper opening, you need at least 5-6 moves. So many transitions between openings after 2 moves.
No, it demonstrates the fact that engines play so much more precisely than humans, that without unbalanced openings, neither of the sides can win over the other.