@@watchodyssey4894 No worries, I'll let you know when I finish; I stopped when my ears started burning, but so far, so good! P.S. Honestly, it wasn't laziness on my part, I'm just so green at this and the Gruen is such a nice watch...
@@watchodyssey4894 Excellent video as always, thank you. I can only dream of numbers like that with most of my watches, with the exception of my Hamilton 992 which ticks along at around +/- 4 seconds per day.* * Sitting dial up on my desk in a room at roughly 72 degrees Fahrenheit.
Yes, I would agree that METAS>COSC. To be fair the Rolex "Superlative Chronometer" certification is arguably better than both at +2/-2 once the (COSC certified) movement is encased in the watch. All very odd.
Excellent work as usual and relaxing commentary to go with it. Cheers Watch Odyssey
Thank you so much. Glad you enjoyed it.
Ok, Ok, I'll do a full service on the Gruen!
Ha Ha. I didn't mean to call you out, just offering some tips to the watchmaking community. Hope you enjoyed the Ulysse Nardin.
@@watchodyssey4894 No worries, I'll let you know when I finish; I stopped when my ears started burning, but so far, so good!
P.S. Honestly, it wasn't laziness on my part, I'm just so green at this and the Gruen is such a nice watch...
@@watchodyssey4894 Excellent video as always, thank you. I can only dream of numbers like that with most of my watches, with the exception of my Hamilton 992 which ticks along at around +/- 4 seconds per day.*
* Sitting dial up on my desk in a room at roughly 72 degrees Fahrenheit.
@@watchodyssey4894 Yes, another well produced and informative video. Thank you!
I've never understood why COSC allows a watch to run slow, its a nonsense, that's why i believe METAS is superior.
Yes, I would agree that METAS>COSC. To be fair the Rolex "Superlative Chronometer" certification is arguably better than both at +2/-2 once the (COSC certified) movement is encased in the watch. All very odd.
Put the Rolex against a $5 Seiko, would be a more fair comparison!