ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 ต.ค. 2024
- Fusion Experts Urge “Much Higher Funding” for LPPFusion - lppfusion.com/...
If you are unhappy with the audio quality, try this version: • The Real Crisis in Cos...
Help move cosmic evolution forward: Fund Fusion! Visit us at wefunder.com/l...
Please watch LPPFusion’s important new video “Pandemic, Economic Crises and the Energy Density Solution”. • Pandemic, Economic Cri...
In previous episodes of the Real Crisis in Cosmology, we saw that the Big Bang hypothesis can’t explain how structure in the universe, especially the largest objects, came to be. In episode 5, LPPFusion Chief Scientist Eric Lerner explains how cosmic evolution occurred without a Big Bang. Based on theories first developed by Physics Nobel Laureate Hannes Alfven, this evolution can be understood as occurring through electromagnetic and gravitational processes that are well understood here on Earth, without any mysterious dark energy, dark matter or inflation.
For a summary of what will be covered in this series and some peer-reviewed publications by Lerner and others: lppfusion.com/...
The Big Bang Never Happened e-book: www.amazon.com...
Learn more about the connection between fusion and cosmology here: lppfusion.com/...
Support our research by donating and subscribing at lppfusion.com/...
Some published papers referred to in this video:
Alfvén, H., 1978, Astrophys Space Sci 54, 279
Alfvén, H., 1981, Cosmic Plasma, (Holland, Reidel)
Battaner, E., Garrido, J., Membrado, M. et al. 1992, Nature 360, 652
Ceccarelli, L., Padilla, N. D., Valotto, C. and Lambas D. G., 2006, MNRAS, 373, 1440
Clowes, R., et al,2013 MNRAS, 429,2910
Collins, C.A., et al, 1986, Nature, 320,506
Dall’Olio, D. 2019, A&A 626, A36
Doi, Y., et al, 2020, arXiv:2007.00176v1
Eilek, J.A. & Owen, F.N, 2002, ApJ 567:202
Einasto, J., Hütsi, G., Suhhonenko, I., Liivamägi, L. J., & Einasto, M., 2020, arXiv:2005.03480
Govoni, F. et al, 2019, Science 364, 981
Hacar, A. et al, 2018, A&A 610, A77
Horváth, I., Hakkila, J. & Bagoly, Z., 2014, A&A 561, L12
Jałocha, J., Bratek, Ł., PȨkala, J. Sikora, S.& Kutschera, M., 2016, Ap J, 833,174
Kim, J. et al, 2019, Science Advances, 5, eaau8227
Kounkel M.& Covey K., 2019, AJ 158, 122
Li, G-X, et al, 2016, A&A 591, A5
Liu, J., Chen, X. & Ji, X., 2017, Nature Phys 13, 212
Mancera Pina, P.E., et al, 2019, ApJL 883, L33
Mészáros, A., 2019, Astron. Nachr. ,340, 564
Müller et al., 2018, Science 359, 534
Nelson, A. H., 1988, MNRAS, 233,115
Oehm, W and Kroupa, P. In Conference Cosmology on Small Scales 2018 p.30, Institute of Mathematics CAS, Prague
O’Sullivan, S. P.,et al, 2020, arXiv:2002.06924v2
Peratt, A.L., & Green, 1983, A&SS, 91, 19
Pont, F., Queloz, D., Bratschi, P.& Mayor, M. 1997, Astron. Astrophys. 318, 416
Riess, A., 2020, Nature Reviews Physics 2, 10
Salehi, A., Yarahmadi, M. and Fathi, S.,2020, arXiv:2001.01743v1
Santiago-Bautista,I., et al, 2020, arXiv:2002.03446v1
Santos-Santos, I.M., Domínguez-Tenreiro, R., Pawlowski, M.S. ,2019, arxiv.org/abs/...
Scolnic, D. M. et al, 2018, ApJ, 859,101
Shirokov, S. I., Lovyagin, N. Yu., Baryshev, Yu. V.,Gorokhov V. L, 2016, Astronomy Reports, 60, 563
Steinhardt, C. L. , Capak, P., Masters, D., Speagle. J. S., ,2016, Ap J, 824, 21
Tsiklauri, D. ,2011, Astrophys Space Sci 334, 165
Vernstrom,T., Gaensler,B. M., Rudnick, L. Andernach H., 2019, ApJ, 878, 2,[92]
Wang, J-W. et al, 2019, ApJ 888, 13
![[Gegagedigedagedago] NEW Help Gegagedigedagedago Nugget escape from Nikocado Avocado Challenge](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/hJWnwRC2Fz8/mqdefault.jpg)
I'm so attracted to this theory!
Dark matter and cosmic inflation are (some) things I have had difficulties with. Especially how some galaxies seem to have much more dark matter than others.
what is that claim based on? dark matter is the stuff theoretically put in a halo in galaxies to have enough matter as to make gravity only have the needed influence for their models to somewhat work, or make it possible they spin in the way we see it.. but my question is what specific observation is referred to when they say a certain galaxy has more magic dark matter, they don't derive this from observations i'm guessing? ... :p
@@runs_through_the_forest That’s not entirely true. They also measure the Gravity within a Galaxy by how much Gravitational distortion is observed and it’s calculated with computers based on Dark matter modelling.
I don’t believe in Dark Matter, but You do need a way to explain the lensing
@@samcerulean1412 Refraction?
Thank you so much for your work. Seems to be the first hypothesis without a need for a calculation trick like "dark matter".
And i really do enjoy listening to you talking about this matter.
To me, you are the coolest guy in physics. I like very much, that you do not use too many of these confusing comparements like Bryan Greene or even Stephen Hawking.
It's facts, well served straight to the point.
Keep up that good work and, please, keep on broadcasting.
This needs to be the new standard modell...
All the best from germany (just to explain all the faults in my writing),
A huge fan
So looking towards the next episode. Your arguments are very convincing
Could we please improve the sound
Stars and galaxies being formed out of a primordial plasma sounds compelling, but the question then becomes "how was the plasma formed?" An exciting series to follow.
I would be ok with "we just don't know" as well. I mean -- it's ok to say that. We are tiny little specks living on a tiny speck of a rock floating in the vastness of space. It's ok for us to not know how all of it began, necessarily..
This is great info, with the latest confirmations being discussed. It makes so much sense.
I'd like to suggest a lapel or shotgun mic.
It's hard to understand with all the room reverb.
You’re a physicist. A brilliant one. Fix the sound!
I do love be these talks. I can understand it. It makes sense. I am so over the Higgs "candidate" boson and the other silliness these people try to pass off as science. So like the "God partical", dark matter is just a myth.
Eric, can I persuade you to purchase a little lapel microphone? The audio in this one is not great.
I know the process! I figured it out a couple of years ago. I sent you an email at LLPfusion. Fill the universe with 'matter' say a hydrogen atom. Theres no space. When we start to fuse these hydrogen atoms THAT CREATES A SPACE, SPACE IT SELF. The more fusion happens the larger the spaces become. Like cavities. The distances between galaxies are increasing because of fusion.. atoms lose mass when they fuse. This makes space in an infinitely atom filled universe. Thanks Mark
Can you please provide more details? Any source or article? Thanks in adv.
@@norenemies imagine an infinite universe filled with 'atoms' (or 'point specific fields', Art hobson), It takes four hydrogen atoms to fuse into each helium atom. During the process some of the mass is converted into energy. The difference between the mass of 4 H atoms and 1 He atom is 0.02862 AMU which is only 0.71% of the original mass. This is the key. Fusion created space it self. I am a field theorist. Not a particles physicists, as it only deals with a poor understanding of field boundaries.
What do you think of Mike McCulloch's Quantized Inertia theory as a way to explain away Dark Matter?
Could a combination of magnetic force and McCulloch's inertial mass theory combine to provide a full explanation?
Brilliant and detailed .
Yes, pls more scientists go through this path
We need to understand gravity first.
Not simply create stupid matter due to effect of gravity that we don't fully understand.
thank you very much for your work and vidéos.
I have a question:
in a non big bang universe, infinite in time, how is hydrogen regenerated ?
it should be, isn't ? otherwise after a while there is no hydrogen left after it has been consumed by stars ?
or is there an infinite amount of hydrogen and no need to regenerate ?
I really look forward to these talks. They are highly intelligent and heading in the right direction. But your kind is dwindling. I hope the remaining wise ones who understand both gravity and electromagnetics hang around for quite some time.
Because the money goes to these scientific jerks that the Vatikan can bay they are more and they are kicked in the front line. Who said that the Sacred examination the Inquisition had stoped? What to expect from authority people who killed Jordano Bruno, Hypatia, and tight the mouth of Galilei? These people hate science more than Communism because only science and education could destroy their authority.
Thank you for the explanation and thank you for your time. I'm really enjoying the series.
I have two questions:
Q1. Do you have a theory on what was the initial state of matter? It formed into filaments and gradually formed smaller and smaller structures, but from exactly what starting point? Do you think that all particles were evenly distributed in space? Entropy tells us that the universe is going towards a certain state, so it makes sense that there would be a starting state as well?
Q2. The part of redshift that is attributed to inflation comes from... distance travelled by the photon? This part is not exactly clear to me, as I don't think redshift was explained in the previous videos either (but that may be me misremembering).
Kind regards
The photon may very well be a myth like dark matter.
In response to Q2. Have you seen Gareth at See The Pattern?
th-cam.com/video/sCwF6AYpIjg/w-d-xo.html
He has been recently discussing redshift. The attached is an interview he did with Eric Lerner. But he has a large library.
Namaste ⚡️🐱💓
This is fantastic stuff. Explains lots of things that didn't make sense to me before. I am not entirely convinced about dark matter. I am from a Big Bang perspective. I will need to read that paper about the influence of plasmas on the velocities of stars orbiting galaxies. Also from the graph you presented from the paper I haven't read yet, it doesn't seem to reflect the full velocities of stars in outer orbits. I am keen to know your view on the Cosmic Microwave Background - what is that all about given there was no Big Bang? How does plasma address dark energy and the so-called expanding [observable] universe. Looking forward to the next episode. Great work.
Question, and im hoping for an open mind here. You state that gravity started to compress the plasma. Where does this force come from? What causes gravity?
He said, he'll come to that later... normally that means one of the upcoming videos.
@@erikurnau3626 must've missed that. That question hit hard and got my focus off the vid since he said that. Thanks
Gravity doesnt exist. The effect of gravitation was never discovered. They just said it was a force then named this made up thing as gravity. Described motion - claiming it an explanation then made up even more crap to fill the massive holes each idea made.
Watch Ken wheeler's vids. "There are no particles, there are only Fields" Art Hobson.
@@slaterdomain well in their defense, there is something pulling us to the center of earth constantly. Even if it is a consequence of some other force or field, why not call it gravity? Like distinguishing a river from a lake, both water, but because of the name you know what kind of body of water it is. Since gravity hasnt really been answered to what it is or whats causing it.
The mistake i think that was made was they started using this local consequence of a force or field to explain eveything. So basically your using a few pixels to explain a whole picture. This comparison reminds me of the black hole "picture" they "took"(read "made")😜
@@pulseaimed ha. Yeah. But its a fundamental floor, naming something doesnt make it real,. E.g. 'dark' everything.... once they can explain the affect/effect of gravitation then they can name it. X
How do you incorporate the expansion of the universe in this theory? Should the filaments be affected by it?
Very well explained. If you have a basic grasp of electromagnetic properties, this does seem a very plausible theory with experimental and observational evidence to support it. The mathematics of how plasma behaves is beyond my training, thank you for making these concepts easily understandable.
I'm blown away. I am a computer programmer by trade and not nearly well versed enough in physics or cosmology to properly evaluate this. I have passionately followed physics and cosmology for decades now. I don't have many words to explain how I feel right now having watched this series. I'm blown away -- if this is really accurate and true -- why aren't physicists and cosmologists looking at magnetic fields and/or at plasma physics? What gives? Are they all this daft? What's going on exactly?
You are the dude! Thank you for sticking your neck out and presenting the rational alternative.
The group think and hierarchical control within far too many science disciplines is doing immense harm to the pursuit of science.
Fascinating!
This series of videos made me aware of Dr. Lerner's book The Big Bang Never Happened and though I'm only 1/3 of the way through it, my lifelong depression has lifted. I think a limitless universe and the Pre-Socratic philosophers have had a very positive effect on my psyche.
Did that effect last?
It’s interesting how Big Bang cosmology precludes any consideration of plasmas conducting current in conjunction with gravitational collapse on a homopolar centre would be working on all scales, rather than an expanding universe driven by gravity alone. (I hope I’m using the correct terminology) How does a homopolar disc that becomes condensed matter trans mutated into heavier elements engender gravity?
It's a pity the sound quality is so abysmal.
Thank you for explaining this. I know that the data you analyze is widely available. How do theorists explain away your observations & explanations? (or do they?)
They ignore it. They believe in the big bang theory and ignore anything that conflicts with that theory.
What happened to sound?
1:25 min: Alfvén is the correct spelling!
I have a theory which explains why all stars in a galaxy orbit at the same speed, which totally excludes dark matter. Because they are pulling each other as they are orbiting in a spiral and therefore a chain of gravitationally connected stars is created. So its like a galactic montagne russe, they all fall in a spiral towards the gravitational center of the galaxy, but because they are gravitationally linked they fall in that spiral at the same speed no matter on what orbit they are. Makes sense ?
I've always been a fan of the 'Ageing Light' theory where light red shifts over time and therefore the universe is not expanding in the way that we think it is
I vaguely remember seeing this theory thanks
I was wondering whether this pinch effect could of created life. I see that chemical processes fairly easily produce tar like Tholins on many worlds. I think the interaction with the highly charged particles in the solar wind organise and align amino acids into structures like RNA
Thank you Eric that was excellent and I tend to agree with most or all of it. The big question with all that is "What exactly is gravity?" Personally I believe it's a sort of surface tension effect by pushing the ether out of the way with mass. Would love to hear your take on this.
Look up Ken wheeler. Read art hobsons "there are no particles, there are only fields".
In the beginning, there was already everything. It just hadn’t yet formed into what we see today.
Yes; there was never a beginning
@@pheonixwilson5577 nor will be a end
@@pheonixwilson5577 No beginning, no end. Somehow I feel comforted by this. Boundless, everlasting. I have a suspicion time is not at all what believe it is. I am not certain it actually exists.
@@Tenskwatawa4U Ask yourself this question: If humans were not around, would time exist? I think not. Time is a human construct. The cosmos would get along quite nicely without time.
@@Alex-kp3hr Very good analysis! I have to agree.
But this itself raises an unsettling question. If there is no time, how can things be said to move? No time means there is no motion, right? There exists no time for anything to go from A to B.
Expressed another way, no time means all possible events are occurring simultaneously (we can easily see the kind of problems this would pose for human perception, right?)
So if there can be no motion this would mean all objects exist in the same place, right? 😱
Very good I like this guy.
Beautifully simple and blindingly obvious.
EDIT: Next task. Explaining gravity.
People playing ping pong underground trying to catch Dark Matter always sounded birraze to me. Like they could be missing something. I would rather like to see that conventional magnetic fields are what keeps the galaxies bond together.
where did the hydrogen come from ?
Try this theory on for size: th-cam.com/video/EckBfKPAGNM/w-d-xo.html
It's conserved.
Do one about the "end" of the universe. That is created because of the big bang theory nothing else.
Let's get him a lavalier microphone.
Q: Einstein never agreed with bigbang-theory and he never refuted his idea of a universe that began as an infinite emptiness?
To explain the origin of gravity Einstein assumed an interaction between that emptiness and spacetime,
that caused space to bend into matter and gravity while time throughout the universe can be relative?
I heard him say there is no dark matter but what does he say about dark energy
Can't have one without the other, basically.
Sound is very bad.
From neutrinos to plasma. The result of the gravity force effect. And this is a continuously happening effect again and again and again when we have a birth after a galaxy or star deaths.
So....the electric universe?
Just because objects are moving away from an object, doesnt mean they came from it. They could have been pulled or pushed.
eric ur overmodulating ur microphone to get a proper volume please do urself a favor and move the mic closer to u say on the desk beside u that would work and who cares if the mic is seen i dont i would rather listen to ur voice un crackling a clear voice would be awesome too ur talks are always filled with good stuff !!
Eureka!
Something happened to your microphone in this episode. Just saying... X
In rigorous agreement, 3BLUE 1BROWN graphics overlap of POV. If the human brain is bisected to separate the hemispheres, there's a property of vision that also separated objectives from labelling and quality-quantity proportioning.
When showing a student a topic with which they are not conditioned to make memory associations, and have a different orientation to make observations about how quantization of pure-math orthogonal-normal log-antilog relative-timing ratio-rates are assembled, of course they will have more effective and efficient ways of learning concepts of music-math harmonic phase-locked coherence-cohesion resonance bonding objectives in terms of AM-FM QM-TIME Completeness.
A hands off approach to reiteration.
In other words, don't know what to say that either I think that specifically fits the z-pinch design, or I think can refit the theory, other than BBT is bunkum, and QM-TIME is a different pattern of concept development.
someone please get this guy a lavalier mic.
Whence came the plasma?
An interesting question that I suspect will be difficult for science or humanity to conclusively establish...as the origins of plasma, or dark matter or singularities, big bangs or even life etc are always going to be difficult to prove and therefore open to conjecture and disagreement.
But what is interesting is that unlike the dark energy and matter (and the big bang gravity and relativity models) ...at least we know plasma exists in the cosmos and experiments with plasma have shown some very interesting results and similarities to cosmic events.
But I have a feeling that origins of energy and matter might not actually be relevant or significant... as even these origin points might simply be phases within an infinity loop...where all things (energy and matter) cyclically go from one state or condition to another and then maybe back again or to another phase of formation..which confusingly means there was no actual origin point to begin with...but hey that's just conjecture of course LOL
It's conserved.
That's to say, there's no loss or gain. E=mc^2. 1=1. A=A. The identity proof.
@@humanitech Not bad. I like the infinity loop idea better than a grand big bang concept leading to a gloomy big nothing. This way nothing is gained or lost. Everything is conserved and recycled as nature originally intended.
@@Alex-kp3hr Me too...the infinity loop is my favourite construct ...however it could be that both are somehow correct and included in the whole cyclical processes of an infinity loop!?
Because we already know that there are clearly opposing positive/negative energies, matter and forces that interact, react and change state....which could mean at the extremes of this light / dark matter cosmos things at some point will completely flip, invert or reverse from one extreme state to the other, and then back again...because of things being naturally and inclusively unstable!
Therefore our current light cosmos, may one-day revert back to a completely dark matter state... and exist for a while ( in that state) until it all reverses again into the next light matter cosmos ...and this goes on forever, but each time slightly different to the last.
But the key problem is that this might be very difficult or even impossible for us to conclusively prove, one way or the other ....especially as we are later evolved light matter beings that can't even fully grasp what is happening in this cosmos now, lol! . And even more problematic is that we (potentially) can't ever exist (as humans) in the dark matter realms or state... to ever observe, experience and record what might be happening in that phase or epoch.
But hey it's always great fun to speculate and ponder though!
for those that dont know what hes saying or understand its how the sun was created and the galaxy
Uh hello...Why would they say as the tiny small currents going in the same direction attract each other and produces larger and larger amounts of current creating a larger magnetic fields as they grow with the pinch effect...and eventually starts the 2nd process... gravity contraction effect.. gravity is not needed to explain anything in the universe ..don't they mean magnetic fields... nobody has ever created gravity in a lab and distinguish it from electromagnetism because it's claimed that they both can do the same exact things just at different strengths.. this must be done to prove gravity exists... electromagnetism does the same things that is claimed gravity can do...so there is no need for gravity...and they will never be able to separate gravity from electromagnetism because it's theoretically impossible to separate them proves that gravity is part of the electromagnetic spectrum...and because gravity is tremendously weaker than electromagnetism the only thing in the universe that gravity can be is the force left over after 2 opposite charges are neutralize respect to each other..but they would still have an combined effect to other things....so there is only 1 thing gravity can be...it the force of a proton keeping an electron in orbit around it ..this explains why gravity is so weak...this proves that protons are magnetism and electrons are electricity....hence electromagnetism... and ultimately proves that there is only a single force in the universe... electromagnetism and the other "forces" are nothing more than part of electromagnetism....ok shows over nothing more left to see here everyone can go home now...I hate to say it but I think that gravity is being left in plasma cosmology solely to deceive people to keep the truth about the universe away from the people...it can be proven
There is a proven force between material objects
such as two iron balls, see Cavendish experiment.
Is that force electric in its origin?
The objects are neutral so there is no Coulomb
force between them. Ok say they are charged but then
water molecules would be quickly attracted (dipole
interaction) and effectively neutralize the balls.
Also it would be very easy to measure if a ball was
charged. Just measure the electric field from it.
There is none.
Ok so the electric interaction is instead perhaps
some kind of neutral dipole-dipole interaction right?
But the the force would go as 1/r^3 not as 1/r^2 as
is proven by the Cavendish experiment.
Alright it must be a magnetic field between them!
Nope it can very easily be measured. There is none.
This would suggest that a gravitational force is really
something else than electromagnetic.
@@sverkere thanks...I'll keep an eye 👀 out for the guy that magically breaks into your house and hits enter then steals your backspace key after the first or second word after every single sentence...you must take care of that problem if you want to be taken seriously...sure is the way I write perfect ...no...but at least they way I write makes it simple for people to read and understand and it doesn't look like slapping the keyboard while I write and I'm too lazy to fix it..
@@sverkere it's impossible to remove all atoms from a container or anything else like space...there is always going to be atoms in a vaccum chamber no matter how hard u try...there is a reason why vaccum tubes were invented and were used...made less resistance because there was much less that could interfere with electrons/electricity traveling through it...the experiment was no different than a vacuum tube...it's impossible to test for gravity...and if u don't have a way using the scientific method to explain it...it can not be true ever... claiming that seeing a star behind the sun during an eclipse is proof of gravity is the dumbest thing anyone can say when it's already know the sun provided electrical energy to earth that literally can be seen with the naked eye... The Auroras are proof that the sun and earth are electrically connected... and only electricity can generate a magnetic field which earth has...it's known that electricity does not take a straight path...it spins/spirals... which is why the earth spins at 90degrees from where electricity from the sun is connected to earth... gravity is bs... people are being intentionally deceived...u can not piss on my head and tell me that it's raining...I know what is going on and whats going to happen
@@sverkere multimeters do not measure exact voltage...this is what confuses you...they measure the average difference and not the actual distance
I have your book the big bang never happened. Its like a science bible 😁
This is too important to have poor sound!
Doc Lerner sounds like he's speaking from the bottom of a well.
My crank-O-meter is sounding an alarm. I think I need to replace the batteries.
I think all teachers and professers must teach big bang or else they will be fired and therefore no paycheck ? 🇺🇸. And,....every person i know and im 69, doesnt even know or care the sun is a star, they just think its just a light in the sky 😣
Unless you have a TOE that is explanatory for all the phenomena one might encounter it is all misinformation and petty description. An eternal, infinite universe as far as we can tell for now with a messed up Lambda CDM model reflecting gross errors that led to 95% of the universe unaccounted for.
Wants to build a fusion reactor - cannot record a decent sounding audio not sounding like crap
Do better, dude.
He must not be an audio engineer or software expert for his research. By the way smart people turn off the sound and click subtitles if they feel the sound nerving.
Why don't you build a fusion reactor yourself? My guess is: because you can handle a mic, but have no clue what a fusion reactor does...
This man is presenting a solid alternative to the standard modell, which is even more likely real, than the standard modell and all you bark about is the bloody sound?
Boomers gonna boom... into their laptop mic placed all the way across the room.
An intelligent man like you should be able to install a lavalier lapel mic on your camera so as to have a minimum of audio intelligibility. Just about anybody these days knows that talking to the microphone on your camera or laptop across the room will result in poor audio. Today we have millions of content creators on TH-cam and they all seem to somehow know the importance of intelligible audio, yet I bet few of them are as intelligent as you. You are espousing radical, even heretical views on Cosmology. If you want people to listen to you rather than dismiss you outright, at a minimum you need clean audio. No serious person is going to suffer through a presentation as you just gave where it is such a struggle to follow you through the nearly unintelligible audio. I watch most TH-cam videos at double speed, but at this speed I can't understand half of what you are saying. I don't have time to slow it down, nor the patience to strain my ears to hear some far out radical theories. I gave you thumbs down for the audio alone. Record this again with clear audio and I will consider your actual proposal.
apparently you don't know how to distinguish between what is truly important, and what is just nice to have. Seriously.