I've been scouring different mtg resources to figure something out, and I'm sure you've had the same question. Some people say that because autumn-tail only targets the aura but not the creature you're moving it to, it gets around hexproof/shroud. But others say that its oracle text mentions "Attach" and attach rulings prevent the attachment of auras and equipments to non-legal permanents. So my question is, does a permanent possessing hexproof mean that it isn't a legal permanent for this card's ability? Or since, say a creature is a legal permanent for an aura that says "enchant creature" the hexproof is only an ability that prevents targeting and, because it can be removed by other effects, doesn't make the permanent itself illegal for effects that say "attach"?
based enchantment enjoyer
I've been scouring different mtg resources to figure something out, and I'm sure you've had the same question. Some people say that because autumn-tail only targets the aura but not the creature you're moving it to, it gets around hexproof/shroud. But others say that its oracle text mentions "Attach" and attach rulings prevent the attachment of auras and equipments to non-legal permanents. So my question is, does a permanent possessing hexproof mean that it isn't a legal permanent for this card's ability? Or since, say a creature is a legal permanent for an aura that says "enchant creature" the hexproof is only an ability that prevents targeting and, because it can be removed by other effects, doesn't make the permanent itself illegal for effects that say "attach"?