I was a bit disgusted about Gregg taking the -2k, but he totally made up for it in the end, he answered many answers correctly! Val and Jono were great, and wow Claire - what a dark horse to bring that cash to the team! Everything just worked out for them - well done!!
So he could have done the $1000 if he was that decent. Therefore no, he was a coward and chose splitting less money over the fear of not making any money. Yall are fine with greed if it comes out well lmao and that's what's wrong with the world😂
the chasers keep saying its a team game and this is the strategy 4 players has the best chance to win 25% of $10K is better than 100% of nothing plus often low scorers dont actually cost much over 4 people by taking a neg choice if they get 19 correct and chaser gets 18 the youngster has won it for them even with doing nothing
@@nikkster01 so have you done the numbers to see how many times that has happened or are you going by "the ratio"? If it never happens, who cares if the maths works out that way🤣 If that player guesses wrong wasting time they make that extra point completely moot
Regarding the minus offer as many a chaser has pointed out, it's there for a reason. I think it depends on where you are positioned and how much money is in the pot as it can be the smart strategic thing to do if it means getting back. Had Craig not contributed anything then maybe the freeloader theory may have kicked in. Also he had no way of knowing that the final amount was going to be so large given that he was contestant number three.
I hate the guy who went for -2K I was literally praying, "Get it wrong, get it wrong" but on the final question of his section I knew he got it right and I was legit mad.
Kilroy was not the character with the long nose looking over a wall - that was Chad. I never saw any drawings of Kilroy (referring, I think, to American soldiers. " Leap about and jump for joy, I was here before Kilroy. In reply to the graffiti phrase "Kilroy was here"!
Bud: They've can't take more money out of the pot. Felix: I agree with you, Bud. Whilst I do appreciate the people who took minus offers, I don't appreciate the contestants who said, "go for it!" to the other contestants in 3 and 2 took the minus 6, most especially from seat four.
Damn, I didn't think there were so many freeloaders in the Chase UK as in the Chase Australia😠. This freeloader even cost the team money! Freeloaders are never any help in the final chase and they want the other contestants to take the risk. I'll give it a chance. But if the freeloaders keep showing their cowardly faces I can't stand watching it. Three of them earned the money. One shouldn't have had anything.
He pulled his weight in the final chase. Gave them answers to pushback and gave at least 3 answers in the chase itself. More than redeemed himself at that point. Chances are, he would have been out had he have stuck with the £1000. Losing the team those 3 answers, and the pushbacks he contributed to, also helping the chasers confidence.
i tend to agree with you but this was legitimately a smart move. if youre gonna take an easy shot to make it back, pull your weight and prove your worth. they did that.
If you're going to put spoilers in the description, please put them down low enough that they don't appear without first scrolling down. There's no point in watching this episode now.
I was a bit disgusted about Gregg taking the -2k, but he totally made up for it in the end, he answered many answers correctly! Val and Jono were great, and wow Claire - what a dark horse to bring that cash to the team! Everything just worked out for them - well done!!
So he could have done the $1000 if he was that decent. Therefore no, he was a coward and chose splitting less money over the fear of not making any money. Yall are fine with greed if it comes out well lmao and that's what's wrong with the world😂
@@thisravenhasflown010 Can we all try to get along?
the chasers keep saying its a team game and this is the strategy 4 players has the best chance to win
25% of $10K is better than 100% of nothing plus often low scorers dont actually cost much over 4 people by taking a neg choice
if they get 19 correct and chaser gets 18 the youngster has won it for them even with doing nothing
@@nikkster01 so have you done the numbers to see how many times that has happened or are you going by "the ratio"? If it never happens, who cares if the maths works out that way🤣 If that player guesses wrong wasting time they make that extra point completely moot
3 correct, 2 wrong and 2 passes!
Don't think I've ever seen so many adverts at once in any other programme. 6 at a time!
I knew she would go for the 38000.... a tough person. I never support taking the minus. I get angry when players do this.
I get angry too
I get angry too. But he made up for it in the end ~ I think he gave the most amount of correct answers.
Darragh Ennis knows that experience too well: He brought his team to 9k but they ended up with ~6k
I'm in the States, and we haven't had the negative offer things. I don't really understand it; how it could be a good strategy.
I love this show so much!
The kid redeemed himself at the end!
Without him I don't think they would've won!
Stephen Ireland p
Stephany Vivas e
Stephany Vivas p
Mark Labbett. My favourite Chaser of all time.
I’ve never seen British TV ads before, was quite fun to watch
This was a good episode
What kind of writer doesn't know the word pulchritude?
Regarding the minus offer as many a chaser has pointed out, it's there for a reason. I think it depends on where you are positioned and how much money is in the pot as it can be the smart strategic thing to do if it means getting back. Had Craig not contributed anything then maybe the freeloader theory may have kicked in. Also he had no way of knowing that the final amount was going to be so large given that he was contestant number three.
It just all worked out in the end... normally it doesn't, not like this.
Claire: you’re welcome.
Bravo! Loved watching it!
1. Jono was smart, but too chicken not to take £25,000.
2. The chaser offering -£4,000 was prompted by stupid Craig taking -£2,000.
Got the ‘pulchritude’ question right, as ‘pulcher’ is Latin for beautiful!
It was an 8th grade vocab word for me.
@@MountainHawkPYL lol same
Guys, Mark Labbett Said Minus Offers Without Saying "Pounds" 2 Times In This Episode of S6 Episode 144!
what a game! really enjoyed this one.
Bud: They've can't take more money out of the pot.
keeping the ads in for authenticity 😂
why write at the bottom how much they won you ruined watching it
totally agree.
Just leave them alone
Don't read anything before watching...
Thanks for telling us the result. Duh.
Craig got em over the line
3:07 Paul Sinha...he can take your blood, your money and the mickey all at the same time. He won't thank Bradley for that one.
I hate the guy who went for -2K I was literally praying, "Get it wrong, get it wrong" but on the final question of his section I knew he got it right and I was legit mad.
Bud: Scared? He only just came out.
Push backs won it!
Instead of adding money into the bank, you have reduced it by £2k!
For once a person like that helps the team to win in the end!
Thanks for uploading val, any idea what episode number in the series this one was?
Kilroy was not the character with the long nose looking over a wall - that was Chad. I never saw any drawings of Kilroy (referring, I think, to American soldiers. " Leap about and jump for joy, I was here before Kilroy. In reply to the graffiti phrase "Kilroy was here"!
Mr. Chad is the British counterpart to the American Kilroy. Same character.
@@MountainHawkPYL Thank you sir, it's good to learn more!
Love the Chase
THAT IS NOT A SHAME
Bud: They've can't take more money out of the pot.
Felix: I agree with you, Bud. Whilst I do appreciate the people who took minus offers, I don't appreciate the contestants who said, "go for it!" to the other contestants in 3 and 2 took the minus 6, most especially from seat four.
christian langdale I also agree with you.
So dumb of anyone to take -2,000 pounds no matter how much they want to get back.
Damn, I didn't think there were so many freeloaders in the Chase UK as in the Chase Australia😠. This freeloader even cost the team money! Freeloaders are never any help in the final chase and they want the other contestants to take the risk.
I'll give it a chance. But if the freeloaders keep showing their cowardly faces I can't stand watching it.
Three of them earned the money. One shouldn't have had anything.
He pulled his weight in the final chase. Gave them answers to pushback and gave at least 3 answers in the chase itself. More than redeemed himself at that point. Chances are, he would have been out had he have stuck with the £1000. Losing the team those 3 answers, and the pushbacks he contributed to, also helping the chasers confidence.
i tend to agree with you but this was legitimately a smart move. if youre gonna take an easy shot to make it back, pull your weight and prove your worth. they did that.
@@trapeaseexactly
You know The Gigant Holger Waldenberger or Sebastian Jacoby from germany
"boy did you pick the right Chaser" kind of a strange comment when the choice isn't even up to the contestants.
If you're going to put spoilers in the description, please put them down low enough that they don't appear without first scrolling down. There's no point in watching this episode now.
Sorry, but we have no such show in Poland :(
minus 2 not much difference really it was the smart choice
This is a team game have people forgotten being motivated by greed serve’s no purpose does it not⁉️
NOT TOO BAD
As if you left the adverts on so annoying.
Minus 2 Fousand In 23:15
The Funny Guy
Bud: The worst decision is definitely the middle one.
Just Rocky Horror Show
Craig you Jammu git lol great chase
Way too many advts
A lot of add last time going on this shit
Cool
Mareseithelonatoagorasoposkaneioloaytothrchase
Craig is cute
Craig is a thief and does not deserve to be in the final plus he is thick
What does him being thick have to do with anything? 💀
iiiiiiiiii
Minus 4 Fousand In 35:03