Random Numbers - Numberphile

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 เม.ย. 2013
  • Using radioactive material to generate random numbers...
    Subscribe to our new channel COMPUTERPHILE here - bit.ly/XqEDYi
    More links & stuff in full description below ↓↓↓
    This video features James Clewett.
    Extra video about what happened next with our Strontium random numbers at • Random Numbers (the ne...
    And the Greek extra bit is at • Random Numbers (extra ...
    NUMBERPHILE
    Website: www.numberphile.com/
    Numberphile on Facebook: / numberphile
    Numberphile tweets: / numberphile
    Subscribe: bit.ly/Numberphile_Sub
    Videos by Brady Haran
    Patreon: / numberphile
    Brady's videos subreddit: / bradyharan
    Brady's latest videos across all channels: www.bradyharanblog.com/
    Sign up for (occasional) emails: eepurl.com/YdjL9
    Numberphile T-Shirts: teespring.com/stores/numberphile
    Other merchandise: store.dftba.com/collections/n...
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 3.7K

  • @muizzsiddique
    @muizzsiddique 7 ปีที่แล้ว +883

    Monopoly should come with a free pair of radioactive metals.

    • @ukkomies100
      @ukkomies100 6 ปีที่แล้ว +55

      Mu'izz Siddique i wouldnt be surprised if that whould have been the case in the 50s

    • @jimannothe
      @jimannothe 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Duungeons and dragons most definitely

    • @achtsekundenfurz7876
      @achtsekundenfurz7876 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Mandatory "roll 3d6 cancer save" comment

    • @yahccs1
      @yahccs1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      We had an electronic double dice device, but I didn't like the way my Dad licked his fingers before touching it. The noise of the real dice wasn't that bad but Dad preferred the 'random number generator' as he didn't like the board getting scratched by fingernails when picking the dice up! I don't know how random it was and if its probability of each number wsa 1/6 like with dice!

    • @uku4171
      @uku4171 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It's not free, it's included in the price.

  • @fredderf5607
    @fredderf5607 6 ปีที่แล้ว +567

    "Think of a random number"
    "Let me get out my strontium 90 isotope and Geiger counter"
    "No, what? No.. just give me a number between 1 and ten!"

  • @thefirespectrum
    @thefirespectrum 9 ปีที่แล้ว +795

    Has anyone made a pseudorandom number generator based on how much adding a picture will screw up the formatting of a word document? There must be a way to quantify that and feed it into a program.

  • @Jabrils
    @Jabrils 6 ปีที่แล้ว +269

    wow. ive came across the video that introduced computerphile. very nice. :D

    • @ZechMadox
      @ZechMadox 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hey man. Love your vids!

    • @TabooGroundhog
      @TabooGroundhog 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Wow, what are the chances?...

    • @TAIR736
      @TAIR736 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ah you're the minecraft guy

    • @TabooGroundhog
      @TabooGroundhog 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dualcoregalaxyxxnewextensi1687
      Those aren’t random there’s a pattern, but I can’t prove they’re not random though

    • @kongwhattodo4216
      @kongwhattodo4216 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TabooGroundhog .

  • @BrooklynAvenue
    @BrooklynAvenue 8 ปีที่แล้ว +138

    I chose 6, which demonstrates my superiority.

    • @Jossandoval
      @Jossandoval 8 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      +Brooklyn Avenue Actually, since 6 is below 7, you demonstrated your inferiority, at least in choosing numbers from 1 to 10.

    • @BrooklynAvenue
      @BrooklynAvenue 8 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      ***** Dammit! I've been bested by Jose Sandoval again! Next time I will choose 11!

    • @dorusie5
      @dorusie5 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Brooklyn Avenue The actual challenge would be to pick a string of numbers of length 20 though, because the considerations he mentioned will really come into play there. "Pick 2 again? I already picked it twice in a row" etc. But yeah cool I picked 9, the trick is to not think and just say the first number that pops into your head out of your unconscious. (At least if they didn't prime you with one earlier in the video).

    • @igordutra4171
      @igordutra4171 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      i chose 5 :D

    • @elenaobradovic4181
      @elenaobradovic4181 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      I chose 6 too

  • @grimmerMD
    @grimmerMD 10 ปีที่แล้ว +248

    7 was the first one that popped into my head, but then I picked 5 a split second later because I remembered I pick 7 all the time...

    • @sshh6285
      @sshh6285 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Beautiful demonstration that our pick is not random at all. That it is series of thoughts, most of the time unconscious.

    • @ddvld90
      @ddvld90 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Did just that, 7 then 5.

    • @joostdriesens3984
      @joostdriesens3984 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I did that too! 😆

    • @DialecticRed
      @DialecticRed ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I picked 2 but that's only because I already knew the majority of people pick 7
      Also, hello from the future. Things are worse now.

    • @Bondrewd_21
      @Bondrewd_21 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@DialecticRed also 2

  • @Cache-Money-Sectors
    @Cache-Money-Sectors 7 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    "It's like if you and I had a weight lifting competition, the result would be random."
    "That's not random, I'm gonna win that one."
    I don't know why this cracked me up so much.

  • @Phlebas
    @Phlebas 9 ปีที่แล้ว +143

    I'm reminded of a statistics class I took during first year university. We all had to buy a specific type of graphing calculator and were told to go through a particular exercise with a "random" number generated by the calculator. As this was the first time many of us used that function of the calculator, about half of us generated the exact same random number. I think our calculator diverged after that, but it was kind of amusing and a pretty clear illustration of how non-random computer-generated random numbers are.

    • @thefremddingeguy6058
      @thefremddingeguy6058 7 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      It might've been because the graphing calculators needed a seed to be inputted from the user, and outputted the exact same numbers with the default seed.
      Or maybe not; that's just what might've happened.
      Yes, I typed this reply two years after this comment was posted.

    • @Thaslughy
      @Thaslughy 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Because the calculator uses the time as input, and it only counts minutes not even seconds?

    • @duffman18
      @duffman18 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I mean if anything, truly random numbers could end up in results like that anyway. Humans like to think of randomness as the things being different every time. But truly random numbers have a lot of repeats, and a lot of numbers that are never chosen at all. The calculator obviously isn't random because no computer can generate truly random numbers. But yeah the fact loads of people got the same number is, if anything, more random, not less.

    • @Phlebas
      @Phlebas 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@duffman18 If what you're saying is that it's a coincidence, I doubt it, mainly because there's a pretty reasonable explanation for all of these calculators coming up with the same random number.
      I get that random results can sometimes create sequences that aren't intuitive. I don't think that's the case here. These calculators were all the same model and fresh out of the package; it makes a certain amount of sense that they would generate identical results with identical user input.

  • @willfreedo
    @willfreedo 8 ปีที่แล้ว +963

    I chose e², because I'm so cool and clever and original and non-mainstream and...
    ...and its first digit turns out to be 7 ( ._.)

    • @forty2888
      @forty2888 8 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      😂

    • @SamuelHauptmannvanDam
      @SamuelHauptmannvanDam 7 ปีที่แล้ว +77

      I'm just amazed that you can say e^2 in a youtube comment.

    • @lucastsui5415
      @lucastsui5415 5 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      -\_(-_-)_/- I can make faces too

    • @lucastsui5415
      @lucastsui5415 5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      I never knew.... -\_(-_-)_/-

    • @Siriusblck3
      @Siriusblck3 5 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@SamuelHauptmannvanDam abnt keyboards have this options, like ², ³, and °

  • @CA5H3W
    @CA5H3W 9 ปีที่แล้ว +370

    I'm also mad I chose 7, idk why that even irritates me

    • @awpmerst
      @awpmerst 8 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      John Smith because being figured out is uncomfortable

    • @MilanTheAngel
      @MilanTheAngel 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Same here, we're in the 7 club

    • @spencerallbritton9459
      @spencerallbritton9459 7 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      Haha I chose 7 too thinking "hey look at me, I'm so random with my random 7." Then he says "45% chose 7." Me: 💔

    • @connorhorman
      @connorhorman 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      I chose 4, then 4, then 7, then 1, then 9, then 10, then 6, then 7

    • @DeathBringer769
      @DeathBringer769 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That you're just another ordinary, fairly predicable person overall... yea, we all like to think we're going to be the ones special or "better" enough to be the exception, lol. Welcome to human biases we all share to a greater or lesser extent though ;)

  • @LarlemMagic
    @LarlemMagic 9 ปีที่แล้ว +283

    6:40 wow this nerd doesn't even have a 12 sided die lying around from his last D&D game.

    • @JayTemple
      @JayTemple 5 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      And he doesn't know that the singular of dice is "die," as you and I do.

    • @glitchwolf1384
      @glitchwolf1384 5 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      It makes me irrationally angry when people believe a die has to have 6 sides, they are objectively wrong, you can have a die of most numbers! grr...
      also sorry I bugged you on a 3 year old comment

    • @jasondeng7677
      @jasondeng7677 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Yall ever want a random number from 0 to 20 and you take out da
      I C O S A H E D R O N

    • @nanigopalsaha2408
      @nanigopalsaha2408 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@jasondeng7677 What if I want a random number between 1 and 13?

    • @jasondeng7677
      @jasondeng7677 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@nanigopalsaha2408
      roll the I C O S A D E D R O N , if you get 10, roll the I C O S A D E D R O N again. if it's even then you got 10, if its odd you get 13. if you don't get 10 in the first one, that's what you get.
      hey, it's still as random as before technically

  • @woobilicious.
    @woobilicious. 9 ปีที่แล้ว +374

    int getRandomNumber()
    {
    return 4; // chosen by a fair dice roll.
    } // guaranteed to be random.

    • @OsirusHandle
      @OsirusHandle 8 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      +aphocus Its not garanted to be random, though. It is still written using an algorithm and is probably a pseudorandom generator in that it fixes results to make it closer to 1/6th probability, which is not actually random. I it was pure randomness it would be possible to get a hundred trillion 6s in a row, its just unlikely.

    • @woobilicious.
      @woobilicious. 8 ปีที่แล้ว +43

      SirusKing Whoosh.

    • @GtaRockt
      @GtaRockt 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      +SirusKing bruh

    • @woobilicious.
      @woobilicious. 8 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      SirusKing You didn't read, it's truly random, because it's a dice roll, not some PRNG.

    • @oplectaster
      @oplectaster 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +aphocus LOL LOL LOL. Finally, a random function to rely on LOL

  • @stagelights_
    @stagelights_ 4 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    "when we throw many"
    *throws dice*
    "...some of them go on the floor"

  • @sabberi
    @sabberi 9 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    I chose 1, because of its low chance of being guessed right. I thought 5, 6, 7, are the top contenders on picking a number from 1 to 10.
    The most fundamental part about *random* is all about semantics. Casually it most often means "something unexpected" or "a set of values with equal chances for one to be picked", and in many definitions "something without a definite plan". It is a very contextual word.
    I just love it how one word, random, can so well join psychology, mathematics, culture and linguistics.

  • @JonathanChappell
    @JonathanChappell 8 ปีที่แล้ว +239

    Who else thought he was going to get a D12?

    • @RoderickEtheria
      @RoderickEtheria 7 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      I wanted to know why he didn't.

    • @General12th
      @General12th 7 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      He looks like the ultimate nerd. I thought he would pull out a d20.

    • @AcornFox
      @AcornFox 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      J.J. Shank to find a random number between 1 and 12? Sure...

    • @connorhorman
      @connorhorman 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Me

    • @johnplesia5154
      @johnplesia5154 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Exactly, because then you don't get a Normal distribution.

  • @vandervir
    @vandervir 10 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    "That's the happy sound of radiation"
    Made my day :D

  • @TomasThelander
    @TomasThelander 11 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Great video. I studied this at the university so I knew most of it already, but James added an extra dimension to it in this wonderful demonstration.

    • @caetanogodinat1989
      @caetanogodinat1989 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      man, can u explain me from where he took the (aX + b) % m? like who invented it, is it rly used to regenerate random numbers?

  • @joseph-fernando-piano
    @joseph-fernando-piano 8 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    One method I have heard of for generating random numbers in microprocessor boards is using the 3rd decimal digit of the ambient temperature as measured by an onboard thermal sensor... this won't repeat in cyclic patterns as you would get with using time...

    • @rosiefay7283
      @rosiefay7283 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      What bitrate can you achieve that way? How long must you wait after reading the sensor once, for the next reading to have 0 correlation with it?
      Doing this a few times might be a tolerable way to generate the value of the *seed* of a PRNG, but for all practical purposes continue by using a computationally slick PRNG.

    • @phr3ui559
      @phr3ui559 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Baded

  • @gonzaloayalaibarre
    @gonzaloayalaibarre 9 ปีที่แล้ว +146

    I chose 7 but immediately changed to 2 since I KNEW they were going to come up with some annoying psycho-mathematical BULLSHIT predicting my first choice, I hate it when that happens xD

    • @gonzaloayalaibarre
      @gonzaloayalaibarre 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Jiří Bém What are you even talking about. And in real life I would have chosen 2, unless they can read minds.

    • @gonzaloayalaibarre
      @gonzaloayalaibarre 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Witch Hat Productions Hahaha, only unconscious reasoning matters? I'm not trying to look special or anything like that, I understand what the video is about, intuitively we tend to think that the most "random" number from 1 to 10 is 7, but thing is that there's people that rarely give an intuitive answer, some people will engage in conscious thinking when you ask them that, some people knows there's going to be a trick so they intuitively discard the first guess (me), some people will have previous knowledge of this trick and give you yet another answer, etc. I don't know why you are so adamant in saying that my answer is not "valid", we TEND to chose 7, we don't ALWAYS chose 7.

    • @ehmcheng
      @ehmcheng 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      +Gonzalo Ayala Ibarre i actually chose 7 and then switched to 2 right before haha

    • @aman_xo
      @aman_xo 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Me too! I picked first 7, and then changed to 2!

    • @palmerwoolworth4250
      @palmerwoolworth4250 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      i did the exact same thing

  • @YLLPal
    @YLLPal 10 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I usually pick 8 out of pure protest for the stats on 7, which of course makes it no longer random.
    Also, the numbers chosen around (and including) the 1 to make it a random part are the sequence for x/7. I can't help but notice that set of numbers.

  • @gabriellecrawford9856
    @gabriellecrawford9856 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    10:33 ZERO??? HAHAHA!! My favorite part!

  • @IvanVassiljevitsch
    @IvanVassiljevitsch 10 ปีที่แล้ว +68

    "As a scientist, I model..... gases." lol

  • @Feyd01
    @Feyd01 10 ปีที่แล้ว +346

    Is anything truly random, or is it just our inability to accurately predict events makes things seem random?

    • @abcdefzhij
      @abcdefzhij 7 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      It's obviously the latter.

    • @barqueros2001
      @barqueros2001 7 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      Feyd01 the location of electrons in an atom, or the desintegration of a radioactive atom

    • @ROVAKAN
      @ROVAKAN 7 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Feyd01 that is philosphy not maths:)

    • @leonk6950
      @leonk6950 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Well Quantum physics are about propability. But everything else is just a lack of knowledge and observation

    • @wurttmapper2200
      @wurttmapper2200 6 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      Just quantum probability is truly random. Classical probability is inability to predict

  • @kjpmi
    @kjpmi 7 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I want to see more James

  • @nicolebmoviesFTW2
    @nicolebmoviesFTW2 9 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Vids like this taught me to abuse the RNG in Pokemon. :')

  • @LeventeLaczko
    @LeventeLaczko 11 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I learned the random number generating system of my old calculator and showed my classmates that I can predict the next random number. Their faces were priceless!

  • @mikestoneadfjgs
    @mikestoneadfjgs 8 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    James Clewett is my role model. I want to be just like him when I grow up but im like 30 so idk

    • @oz_jones
      @oz_jones 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      You can always aim to be like Cliff Stoll :)

  • @thesuomi8550
    @thesuomi8550 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    That "Brilliant!" shout would've been a great way to jump to a sponsored section

  • @26CW128Jake
    @26CW128Jake 8 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    "Pick a number between 1 and 10." - "π"

    • @agar0285
      @agar0285 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      same

    • @R3lay0
      @R3lay0 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Just say 3, it's the same

    • @noufqahtani5386
      @noufqahtani5386 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@R3lay0 Why though? No one ever said it had to be an integer.

    • @R3lay0
      @R3lay0 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@noufqahtani5386 And you picked one nontheless

    • @noufqahtani5386
      @noufqahtani5386 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@R3lay0 Nope, I picked pi. Don't assume you know what I picked.

  • @grabern
    @grabern 7 ปีที่แล้ว +125

    I chose 4, which is even, early on, near the middle and not prime. Lmao.

    • @WlatPziupp
      @WlatPziupp 7 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      Me too. Clearly us both choosing the same number is not random, and we are linked by alien tarot card readings

    • @RobotProctor
      @RobotProctor 7 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Solid choice... I like 4. 4 is the only number where its english spelling uses the same number of letters as the number represents. ("four" has 4 letters).

    • @garbomode29
      @garbomode29 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Me too. we're superior in generating random numbers

    • @elijahbaley5556
      @elijahbaley5556 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      4 is probably the second most common to be chosen.
      It's as close to the lower bound (1) as 7 is close to the upper bound (10.)
      So, they're close enough to being to the middle without being at the middle.

    • @shawnlink2217
      @shawnlink2217 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Are you sure my middle of the road 5 that i picked isn't even more random because no one expects 5?

  • @rpdigital17
    @rpdigital17 8 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    Many people pick 5, because this is their "lucky number" (talk to my hand...). I picked 6, I do like the hexagons and hexapod robots.

    • @andyli1890
      @andyli1890 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      RPdigital I thought 7 was the most common lucky number

    • @user-rw2im1sm1e
      @user-rw2im1sm1e 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      RPdigital I pick six too
      *picked

    • @ernycas1
      @ernycas1 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You put a logic in action when was asked to pick A RANDOM number, pal

    • @nb3775
      @nb3775 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I picked 5

    • @Giyga
      @Giyga 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      5 is my lucky number

  • @Breiflabb1000
    @Breiflabb1000 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Agreed. "Too complex to calculate" is not random.
    It should also be noted that you need outer limits for your random number. In this video they go 1-10, 1-6, 2-12 etc. If it was truly random and open, you could get very very large numbers, and they would be as probable as the lower ones. You also have to limit it to number sets. Do you want negative numbers? Imaginary numbers? Integers? etc.

  • @lladerat
    @lladerat 10 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    I think there is no randomness in the universe. Everything has a cause, even those individual electrons flying into detector not doing it randomly, but because of.. some processes that happens on that particular level. So basically there is no such thing as a random number (or anything, really...), even if we use events that take place in space to generate random nubers they wont be random but will represent 'breath of the universe'.

  • @TrebleWing
    @TrebleWing 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Before I knew it would be between 1-10 I was imagining 367. When I heard 1-10, I truncated the 67 and chose 3.

  • @asd49789
    @asd49789 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Seriously, for me, this channel is one of the few things that keep the faith of a prosperous future for mankind :)

  • @donaldsitompul4363
    @donaldsitompul4363 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Quiet decently honest explanation of randomness and random numbers🍥

  • @elementalsheep2672
    @elementalsheep2672 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Came across this video exactly 7 years after it released, to the day. How random is that??

  • @seanwestfall1728
    @seanwestfall1728 10 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    So where is the proof that the numbers that thing is providing are in fact random? How do we know that it's not just producing numbers in a pattern we're not currently aware of?

    • @yakov9ify
      @yakov9ify 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Because we can't predict what the pattern is so even if there was a pattern it would still count as random

    • @austinconner2479
      @austinconner2479 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Current understanding of quantum mechanics is that it is described only by tuly random events and that no larger theory with currently unknown variables can explain our data. This was explicitly tested and ruled out in the Bell experiments, although I'm not an expert in the exact statement of the result.

    • @angelmendez-rivera351
      @angelmendez-rivera351 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      The proof is that quantum effects are random since they are the consequence of a wavefunction collapse, and the wavefunction is nothing but the probability amplitude of a state.

  • @Binder_Studio
    @Binder_Studio 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This guy is sick!! the first youtube video I liked and commented on

  • @m.s.b.8929
    @m.s.b.8929 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    This video is awsome! I ALWAYS link it to my friends who defend determinism

  • @Tim-Jaeger
    @Tim-Jaeger 8 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    I don't know why I chose 1 but I did

    • @jamesoliver9411
      @jamesoliver9411 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      same here
      ......i always go with what would be considered "the road least traveled"

    • @olaf4318
      @olaf4318 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Had to study that poem tooooo much in grade 9

  • @DocWolph
    @DocWolph 10 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    I chose 6.

  • @zunwang2214
    @zunwang2214 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    scientist: "computer, give me a random number"
    =====7.5 million years later======
    computer: "42"

  • @lkjhoiuy97yjhgghfyrthgvjhguty
    @lkjhoiuy97yjhgghfyrthgvjhguty 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    You need a D12 to generate numbers between 1 through 12. Mostly used for Pen and paper roleplaying games.

  • @Athenas_Realm_System
    @Athenas_Realm_System 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Another method used by many operating systems for generating random numbers for cryptography is to take seeds from all kinds of sources like hardware interupts down to the nanosecond and then run an encryption algorithm on it using previous number generated so rather than starting with one seed you have constant reseeding and after a couple minutes running the algorithm for the first time generally the random numbers while still being pseudo-random appear statistically random... Yarrow is one of those algorithms that is used by both /dev/random and the /dev/urandom on OS X (both are linked as OS X doesn't block like linux).

  • @janruge2911
    @janruge2911 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    "I choose a random number using srand(time()); " and every crypto guy starts to cry...

  • @alexandterfst6532
    @alexandterfst6532 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent video

  • @hypercoder-gaming
    @hypercoder-gaming 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Me: picks 4
    Them: *throws 4 out because it's even*

  • @TheGreatRakatan
    @TheGreatRakatan 8 ปีที่แล้ว +55

    Weird, I chose 4

    • @timclaydon5383
      @timclaydon5383 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      +TheGreatRakatan Me 3!

    • @JoshuaBarretto
      @JoshuaBarretto 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      +Tim Claydon You're not trying hard enough to get there...

    • @TheCherry1994
      @TheCherry1994 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +TheGreatRakatan Chosen by a fair dice roll

    • @almogbarel1
      @almogbarel1 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      me too

    • @JoshuaBarretto
      @JoshuaBarretto 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      *****
      Pretty sure he said "whole" integer.

  • @Lugmillord
    @Lugmillord 10 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    At first I thought "4", but I expected the numbers in the middle to be chosen more often, so I took 1.

  • @Manatee360Phototography
    @Manatee360Phototography 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    all I've learned is that there is no such thing as true random. This is incredibly valuable information

  • @sammuel1971
    @sammuel1971 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    brilliant video suggestion for waffling about the ancient greeks :)

  • @alicemalloney1483
    @alicemalloney1483 8 ปีที่แล้ว +82

    I chose 1.
    I don't like 7 because it's too mainstream.

  • @la_lavanda
    @la_lavanda 6 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    "Choose a number between 1 and 10"
    Class:
    "32!"
    "475,003,362,834,123!"
    "Finland!"
    Teacher:😐😑

    • @brettefantomet
      @brettefantomet 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Memory overflow, you say?

    • @Sci0927
      @Sci0927 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      the first one is bigger than you think

    • @masonhunter2748
      @masonhunter2748 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Sci0927 32 factorial.

  • @Vospi
    @Vospi 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Came here after Tetris bit and was amazed. Thank you thank you thank you.

  • @Mansch111
    @Mansch111 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    i loved the ending :)

  • @user-dv3lz1vx3g
    @user-dv3lz1vx3g 9 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    i choose 9;-;

  • @orrebiff
    @orrebiff 9 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    i pretty pissed that i picked 7 >,

  • @ScurvyJohn
    @ScurvyJohn 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I definitely picked seven and for those exact reasons. I just have categories for all the other single digits, and so they don't feel random. Pretty cool

  • @Luigiman-rc9fi
    @Luigiman-rc9fi 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think that the video ending with a 0 is a pretty good demonstration of random numbers.

  • @AlexTimification
    @AlexTimification 10 ปีที่แล้ว +39

    I chose 7...

    • @shugaroony
      @shugaroony 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Lucas Silva We all did it seems!

  • @CanalTALL
    @CanalTALL 9 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    7 was the first to come to my mind, then a changed to six. I tried this with my 11 yrs old syster and she picked 7

  • @gato-junino
    @gato-junino 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    This video is very good! Mainly for Statistics students.

  • @billclinton6040
    @billclinton6040 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    For anyone who is familiar with this topic, the fact that he went straight for the strontium-90 to generate a truly random number should be no surprise. However, the explanation of how adding the result of N dice rolled tends to a gaussian distribution as N becomes large (aka the law of large numbers) was a digression, and I would have appreciated some discussion on why a radioactive element is necessary versus the "random" number generator embedded in your favorite program. Or even better, what alternatives exist besides radioactive ones.

  • @JakobVirgil
    @JakobVirgil 8 ปีที่แล้ว +66

    I picked 4 because I am a rabbit and that is as far as I can count.

    • @longevitee
      @longevitee 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hrair.

    • @D3w10n
      @D3w10n 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I picked 4 because count to 4 inhale count to 4 exhale

    • @connfdm
      @connfdm 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      4th

  • @Bodek-756
    @Bodek-756 9 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I chose 3 ...

  • @Wilq59r
    @Wilq59r 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    "This radioactive strontium is dangerous, needs to be respected, because if not, it will hurt you." Then proceeds to use it as a paperweight.

  • @nicolau2
    @nicolau2 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great great video!
    The conclusion thereby is that the most random number is not 7 or 3, is 10.

  • @stephennielsen8722
    @stephennielsen8722 10 ปีที่แล้ว +60

    I chose Pi

    • @d0themath284
      @d0themath284 7 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      i chose tau!
      6.
      2831853071 7958647692 5286766559 0057683943 3879875021
      1641949889 1846156328 1257241799 7256069650 6842341359
      6429617302 6564613294 1876892191 0116446345 0718816256
      9622349005 6820540387 7042211119 2892458979 0986076392
      8857621951 3318668922 5695129646 7573566330 5424038182
      9129713384 6920697220 9086532964 2678721452 0498282547
      4491740132 1263117634 9763041841 9256585081 8343072873
      5785180720 0226610610 9764093304 2768293903 8830232188
      6611454073 1519183906 1843722347 6386522358 6210237096
      1489247599 2549913470 3771505449 7824558763 6602389825
      9667346724 8813132861 7204278989 2790449474 3814043597
      2188740554 1078434352 5863535047 6934963693 5338810264
      0011362542 9052712165 5571542685 5155792183 4727435744
      2936881802 4499068602 9309917074 2101584559 3785178470
      8403991222 4258043921 7280688363 1962725954 9542619921
      0374144226 9999999674 5956099902 1194634656 3219263719
      0048918910 6938166052 8504461650 6689370070 5238623763
      4202000627 5677505773 1750664167 6284123435 5338294607
      1965069808 5751093746 2319125727 7647075751 8750391556
      3715561064 3424536132 2600385575 3222391818 4328403978
      7619051440 2130971726 5577318723 0676365593 6460603904
      0706037059 3799154724 5198827782 4994435505 6695826303
      1149714484 9083013919 0165906623 3723455711 7781501967
      6350927492 9878638510 1208018554 0334227801 9697648025
      7167232071 2741532020 9420363885 9111923978 9353567489
      8896510759 5494536942 0809506929 2416093368 5181389825
      8662735405 7978304209 5043241139 3204811607 6300387022
      5067648600 7117528049 4992946527 8283985452 0853984559
      3564709563 2720186834 4328243984 9172630060 5723659491
      1141349967 7010989177 1738539913 8185442159 5018605910
      6423306899 7440551192 0472961330 9982397636 6959550713
      2739614853 0850557251 0363683514 9345781955 5455876001
      6329412003 2290498384 3464344295 4470028288 3947137096
      3227223147 0510426695 1483698936 8770466478 1478828666
      9095524833 7250379671 3897112419 8438444368 5451005085
      1377534358 0989203306 9336099772 5446558357 2171568767
      6559359533 6290820190 7767572721 9013601284 5025041023
      4785969792 1682569772 5389120848 3930570044 4213223726
      1348855724 4078389890 0942474275 7392191272 8743834574
      9355293151 4792482778 1731665291 9916267809 5605518019
      8931528157 9025389367 9670519141 9651645241 0449788154
      5343895653 6965202953 9818052802 7278887491 0610136

    • @KnufWons
      @KnufWons 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Gman5938 that is bigger than 6, and therefore basically 7

    • @Koplerio
      @Koplerio 7 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      +Knuf Wons
      Someone doesn't know the .5 rule :D

    • @GustavoGaming
      @GustavoGaming 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Knuf Wons
      yeah but 2 is lower than 5 so its still 6

    • @kaina5467
      @kaina5467 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      I pick 9.95136833564228, exactly that number, deal with it

  • @loralogue
    @loralogue 8 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    What if you want to generate a number between one and twelve? You get your d12 out. Then you grab your dice bag, tip 83 of them on the table and if any of them land on the floor you finish your drink and reroll them because those are the house rules. Honestly, what kind of nerd are you?

    • @oz_jones
      @oz_jones 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I mean honestly!

  • @jezaustevas7170
    @jezaustevas7170 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    A small upgrade to your program: choose apropriate time scale and iterate through binary length of a chosen number size (i.e. 8 bits). If in a given time scale electron reached a counter you set this bit to 1, else you set it to 0. This should make your program return value much faster.

  • @jaxonnobles
    @jaxonnobles 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    People choose 7 because when we think of the word "random" we usually think of "what is the number with the least connotations with it". Which happens to be 7 when it's 1 - 10. When it's 1 - 20 people usually choose either 7, 17, or 19. When it's from 1 - 30 people usually choose 11, 17, or 19. When it's from 1 - 40, people usually choose 17, 19, 29, 31, or 37. Etc.

  • @90MichaelTaylor
    @90MichaelTaylor 10 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    Its funny because i picked 5 for my random number

  • @SteveChisnall
    @SteveChisnall 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    8:22 He must play ShadowRun a lot

  • @danielkruyt8192
    @danielkruyt8192 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    For anyone wondering, the pseudo-random number generator he described is called a Linear congruential generator.

  • @anawesomepet
    @anawesomepet 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    So, I checked frame by frame and the 3 6’s that were rolled were in the SAME ORIENTATION!

  • @devinmcgill4758
    @devinmcgill4758 10 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    For a random number why not just use pi?

  • @wolfelkan8183
    @wolfelkan8183 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    "Is there something innately random about the number 7?" Well, it's by far the hardest of the integers from one to ten to tell if another number is divisible by.

  • @jonasbuyle1341
    @jonasbuyle1341 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    This guy actually has a radioactive source at his his disposal just for generating random numbers.

  • @adamlabnaki9216
    @adamlabnaki9216 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I chose this video because he's so fit!!!

  • @SpiritmanProductions
    @SpiritmanProductions 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Great video and all, but, when referring to individual digits, why do you still say 'number' and not 'digit'?

    • @samuelpronk5096
      @samuelpronk5096 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      +Spiritman Productions Because every individual digit also stands for a number. 7 is both a digit and a number, whereas 17 would be a number consisting of two digits (1 and 7). Both would be correct really, but given we're talking about numerical concepts in our head, number is the adequate term.

    • @rosiefay7283
      @rosiefay7283 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      He was talking about integers in the range 1..10 (and, later, 1..6, so that he could use a d6). So why not say "number"?

  • @mjdillaha
    @mjdillaha 9 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    I chose 12, how likely was that?

    • @GregorShapiro
      @GregorShapiro 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Very unlikely (the number was to be between 1 and 10).

    • @unfa00
      @unfa00 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Out of bounds.

    • @melbournetransport8987
      @melbournetransport8987 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Being the Internet not too unlikely

    • @larho9031
      @larho9031 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      0.00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001

    • @setatimerforonehour
      @setatimerforonehour 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@GregorShapiro wooosh

  • @zaproid
    @zaproid 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    I recently, this year started always picking 1 at these kinds of things, because shit has been getting real, high school graduation and the need of some serious choices has forced me into a new mindset for the future - I want to succeed, I want to be a winner so 1 is the only way to go.

  • @hoekz
    @hoekz 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Haha! The numbers he picked at 2:17 are all the digits in 1/7: 0.142857 (repeating) he picked 1,2,5,7,8,4!

  • @mihaitensor
    @mihaitensor 10 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I've chosed 7 :))

  • @subjectt.change6599
    @subjectt.change6599 10 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    I hate to be overly philosophical, but can anything above the quantum level be truly random? Aren't the systems sufficiently deterministic as to always have patternicity, even if chaotic?

    • @austinconner2479
      @austinconner2479 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The radioactive source is truly random because of the quantum effects you mention. It's true physics is deterministic aside from quantum effects, but as with radiation, quantum effects can affect macroscopic things as well in some cases. In practice, for serious randomness (for example, for cryptography), computers will collect entropy from its environment, ie the exact arrival time of network packets or completion times of hard drive seeks. Like you say maybe these could be predicted in principle if you could know the exact state of the world, but this is practically impossible. Extreme needs (military?) may even put radioactive sources in the computer and use those timings.

    • @angelmendez-rivera351
      @angelmendez-rivera351 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Jeffrey Elliott No, nothing aside from quantum effects can be random. Every classical system is deterministic. The roll of a dice is deterministic. Us being too limited to do the complicated math to know what value will come out of the roll with arbitrary precision does not make it random, it makes it chaotic.

  • @TidalslimShady
    @TidalslimShady 10 ปีที่แล้ว +54

    and this my friends is why i have i have a 1000 sided dice the size of a basket ball

    • @unfa00
      @unfa00 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      How do you even tell which side is up one you roll it?

    • @konnorvurtikal1297
      @konnorvurtikal1297 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Actually the largest dice in which all sides have an equal probability has only 120 sides

  • @nathanreveron7726
    @nathanreveron7726 10 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    I chose four!

    • @macaronivirus5913
      @macaronivirus5913 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Welcome to the club of those who chose 4

  • @cecillemilitante3115
    @cecillemilitante3115 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Not only are the numbers random,this video is more random than Vsauce topic switches.

  • @bennyksmusicalworld968
    @bennyksmusicalworld968 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    241 views to 1 million! We can do it guys!

  • @hallcrash
    @hallcrash 10 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    So that is how we win at lotto? cool.

  • @DominikLederhas
    @DominikLederhas 10 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I chose +-3.

  • @vincenzo-zocca
    @vincenzo-zocca 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video! We need both randomness and pseudo-randomness.
    I'd implement a random generator with two (or more) dices just like I'd implement a random generator based on bytes; By concatenating the results.
    Two concatenated dices range from seximal (couldn't resist) s00 to s55. A little % s20 gets a result from s00 to s15.
    I admit immediately that my dilettante way of faffing about is nowhere near as cool as 1) being an actual scientist and b) using strontium.

  • @HunterJE
    @HunterJE 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

    HAH, I paused and initially thought "7" and then immediately thought "no that's the obvious 'random-feeling' integer" and rejected it

  • @KDNG105
    @KDNG105 8 ปีที่แล้ว +50

    I picked 9

    • @Qa91
      @Qa91 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Me too

    • @KDNG105
      @KDNG105 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Baby Lady Bug don't tell me what to do

    • @ky-gp4sz
      @ky-gp4sz 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Me too

    • @sansfont
      @sansfont 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Kien D. N. Same here.

    • @dxutube
      @dxutube 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Snap

  • @NickShvelidze
    @NickShvelidze 10 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Hey I chose 6

  • @phoenix21studios
    @phoenix21studios 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Random usually means unpredictable.

  • @ColaEuphoria
    @ColaEuphoria 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The sum of dice does not approach a normal distribution. It is actually an Irwin-Hall distribution. They look similar, but Irwin-Hall has a much flatter top with shorter tails, and is a piecewise polynomial, not exponential.

  • @MultiGoban
    @MultiGoban 9 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I asked my mom and dad separately, both said 7 LOL

    • @agar0285
      @agar0285 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      you have 7 likes

  • @chixenlegjo
    @chixenlegjo 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    i thought before he said "between 1-10" i was thinking about 14 so i thought OK HALF OF THAT and thats how i got 7