Somehow, this video gave me the feeling that you just want to push the "Get Copilot, code goes brrrr" narrative a lot. For any. Scenario. Possible. To me, the tutorial value seems to be degrading or, somehow being dumbified to be able to be understood by any kind of person that wants to start now and doesn't want to learn the basics. Idk, let's see how things progress, I hope the content quality does not keep degrading just because, now we have a good tool to helps us understanding different ways to fix a problem.
Find an example and it has a void function and your example does not have it, but has that .app. If you write a code describing some builders building a street carrying concrete pad bricks it's that what you want, because it's a 503 dirt now to your restaurant door. Why won't you tell them yourself after watching their meaningless party about how they code?
I'd like to see examples of using copilot to refactor existing code if that is possible
Nice!
Somehow, this video gave me the feeling that you just want to push the "Get Copilot, code goes brrrr" narrative a lot.
For any. Scenario. Possible.
To me, the tutorial value seems to be degrading or, somehow being dumbified to be able to be understood by any kind of person that wants to start now and doesn't want to learn the basics.
Idk, let's see how things progress, I hope the content quality does not keep degrading just because, now we have a good tool to helps us understanding different ways to fix a problem.
Find an example and it has a void function and your example does not have it, but has that .app. If you write a code describing some builders building a street carrying concrete pad bricks it's that what you want, because it's a 503 dirt now to your restaurant door. Why won't you tell them yourself after watching their meaningless party about how they code?
@@jkdmyrs Rob - how do I connect that to facebook?