sir please tell us best books to learn about moryan empire how it worked. Which book is best to read chankya’s arthashastra. And what’s best reliable source to read ancient scriptures
Really an awesome question and a Behtreeeen explanation of that question 👀 #askAbhijit SIR I have a question. In particle physics they teach us about Gravitons😅 but Einstein explained the 4-D space time fabric in the past,which is the totally different explanation of how gravity works... So is this exchange particle concept of Gravitons(which we study in Particle Physics) is wrong? 😶👀
#AskAbhijit Sir I've a question that we've seen ghosts existing and we've also seen paranormal activitists using emf meters to convert the mag & electrical field changes caused by ghosts to sound... So can ghosts as we call them r creatures of other dimensions having access to our plane..?
#AskAbhijit sir, as we approach the speed of light time slows down so does time stop for the person travelling at the speed of time or for a photon travelling at a speed of light?
#Askabhijit There is a belief that Earth is situated at head of Shesh Nag. Shri Balram is a Avatar of Sheshnag and Shri balram's another name is Sankarshan ( संकर्षण) which mean attraction. is it possible that our ancestor were talking about gravity in the name of Sankarshan.
#AskAbhijt sir if black hole do not even allow light to escape from at then how often radiation is emitted by the Black hole and if space is expanding then why aren't the spaces between the atoms are increasing . Sir plz answer , I was asking this question for the first episode.
It's the boundary of black hole, called event horizon, which radiates energy and gravitational pull at this is lower than Black hole, it consists of matter revolving at high speed,
Sir I'm a high school student I'm confused if photon are massless so we can say it is not necessary for matter to have mass and volume as photon do not have???
Sir , isnt the mass of photons 0 only when they are not in motion, So that way when they are moving they have a certain mass and are therefore affected by gravity?
Namaskaram sir, from Childhood I've a question that if Earth is round or elliptical then how we humans and other organisms live on it feeling like it's flat and also why the water in oceans doesn't spill due to rounded surface. Sir please answer this I'll thankful to you always 🙏 #AskAbhijit
Bcz Earth's gravity is pulling everything towards it, and in space nothing is there which is applying any kind gravity on us, so we don't feel any levitation towards space, and other thing earth is so big, we can't earth as round from its surface, but if you will fly in a plane you can figure it, that's it
The dimension of Earth is huge in comparison to your size or the size of any man made object hence you only see a very miniscule part of it at any point in time like a near sighted person can only see only the small iteration of a large sequence. As you travel further away from the surface of Earth you will see its larger dimension and it's curvature or from earth itself if you get to see the horizon on the sea you can see its curvature. Also Earth is the largest object closest to us and hence we are bound to Earth, that includes huge bodies of water like seas and oceans. They cannot escape the gravity of Earth. Though because of the force of the next biggest celestial body close to Earth..The Moon, there are huge waves lifting out of the oceans and seas also known as tides.
#askabhijit may be a silly question but Sir, Just wondering that since our sun is getting older day by day.. and the energy emitted is reducing, Will there b any time when venus will become habitable and earth will become cold enough that life will cease to exist on it.. like might have happened with mars! 😑
Nope our sun will expand and very possibly engulf first four planets first then after some time it will start shrinking ..so Venus ........my friend as u know it today will be destroyed before Earth.
Could it be a possibility that gravity classically defined as a force is actually the description of the spacetime field? The distortion of the spacetime field is influenced by the concentration of energy per unit volume. To my knowledge there has been no experiment to verify the Energy-Momentum Tensor in Einsteins Field equations. Study in the area could provide insight to solve the 3 body problem.
According to e=mc^2 every mass has equivalent energy and every energy have equivalent mass but why we considered light (photons) have massless however they have high energy to travel
Not sure about myself but.... Birds with teeth as in prehistoric era were supposedly seen as dragons and they would often gush out hot air out of their mouth... Which might be portrayed as fire.... Not sure but still.... Correct me if I'm wrong guys...
#Askabhijit sir please explain the questions asked by Acharya Agnivrat naisthik ji on black hole and other cosmos discoveries, even Nasa was failed to answer him, and claims that he decoded Vedas and explained black holes and string theory
How many photons of light can occupy any one space? Let's take any spot in space, since light from everything in space is sending photons through that one spot. Throw in star ejecta, gravity, cosmic radiation, subatomic particles....seems an awful lot of "stuff" occupies the same space. Makes you wonder, maybe no mass, then the gravity bending light around distant galaxies? Could be an optical illusion or another force. seems like you see it way off into the light years.
** एक ही जाति के लोग अछूत भी सछूत भी ** " मतलब जाति के कारण अस्पृश्यता नहीं थी " सोर्स - अम्बेडकर हिंदी संपूर्ण वाड़मय vol- 4 page- 210.___ इस पर भी वीडियो बनाएं , ज्यादा से ज्यादा 30 sec की ।,,,
What if a dictator comes to power in India with a pure intention to restore the teachings of Vedas and the Hindu civilization in India? He amends all the "bad" things of our colonial constitution and beurocracy, establish Gurukul system including modern science and computers and makes sanskrit the third national language.What will be the pros and cons of that?
The “curvature of spacetime” makes no sense. If the frame of reference by which things like straightness and curvature are measured is itself curved, then there’s no way to distinguish between straightness and curvature. So, too, with the “expanding cosmos” nonsense. If literally everything is expanding, including our rulers with which we measure distance, then everything continues to be measured just as it was before. Mach was correct. There is no such thing as being “at rest.” All motion is relative to all other objects. All paths of motion are curved/helical.
If Earth was somehow a square-shaped celestial body, they would not say 'curvature of spacetime' they would say 'the smooth edges then sharp 90 degree corners of spacetime' To this day, 99.99% of STEM-educated people have not committed the time to come to grips with the exact physical nature of gravity. If Einstein, Dirac, Wheeler, Feynman, Heisenberg, Lorentz, Hawking, and so on were asked this question: *_"What is the exact physical nature of gravity - and what are the constituents, if any, that occupy free space, that allow gravity to manifest?"_* NONE OF THOSE 'HEROES OF PHYSICS' would be able to answer. Do we know that for sure? YES WE DO. None of them - and none to this day have: 1) explained how all collections of atoms manifest gravity, even though Cavendish, in the year 1798 (yes, 225 years ago) proved experimentally that the smallest collections of atoms produce a gravity field 2) and none of them have put forth a means for creating artificial gravity The HEROES OF PHYSICS are like shipbuilders who have never seen the ocean. .
@@Greg_Chase Modern physics is unable to describe gravity because their cosmology, their metaphysical premises of the nature of the universe, don’t permit it. Gravity is a contraction of space itself. (EM radiation is it’s inverse: an expanding wave of space itself.) I’m looking forward to artificial gravity. We’ll be able to construct vehicles that are pulled anywhere by it, like falling in any direction you choose.
@@hermes_logios A small group of us work at artificial gravity; our background is electrical engineering and physics. This was our first device: 1) a lamination (ie. layers) of thin aluminum, each layer separated by insulation, laid out horizontal on the workbench 2) a vertical magnetic field through the center of the lamination 3) radial, horizontal RF currents are induced in the lamination This creates an E x B Lorentz force of the charged particles in the metal (the right hand rule, recall). The Lorentz force coherently sweeps the charged particles in the metal at the frequency of the RF fed to the device. We made alterations to the design by changing the dimensions of the lamination, and changing the applied RF frequency to induce resonance/standing waves across the metal. Artificial magnetism (the electromagnet) was invented 200 years ago by William Sturgeon, and there's no reason artificial gravity should not be experimented with; that's how Sturgeon invented the electromagnet, by experimenting. The only thing stopping it is - the idolizing of general relativity etc. that claims "immense mass" is the only way to create gravity. The entire physics community suffers from "learned helplessness" .
This type of shorts should be increased
Excellent sir, I'm fortunate I,hv found this channel
Sir, you inspire me a lot. 👍
lucky guy
Hey, Great question!
brother shiva holds/is the black hole.. its confirmed.. even abhijit chavda knows it
Sir you're hope to revive Indian youths. Please keep making awesome videos❤️
how angkor wat temple have dinosaur sculpture? Is this a buddhist temple or hindu temple?
It was previously a vishnu temple, then later became Buddhist
Sir your explaination makes me fascinated towards quantum physics
sir please tell us best books to learn about moryan empire how it worked. Which book is best to read chankya’s arthashastra. And what’s best reliable source to read ancient scriptures
The only question which bothers me is "what's the energy?" Not generally but exactly what is the energy regarding the source of it and what it is?
Really an awesome question and a Behtreeeen explanation of that question 👀
#askAbhijit
SIR I have a question. In particle physics they teach us about Gravitons😅 but Einstein explained the 4-D space time fabric in the past,which is the totally different explanation of how gravity works... So is this exchange particle concept of Gravitons(which we study in Particle Physics) is wrong? 😶👀
Great❤️
sir tell us about gravitational wave
#AskAbhijit Sir I've a question that we've seen ghosts existing and we've also seen paranormal activitists using emf meters to convert the mag & electrical field changes caused by ghosts to sound... So can ghosts as we call them r creatures of other dimensions having access to our plane..?
Ik it's been 2 years lol but do you wanna know what I think about this?
wow sir
#AskAbhijit sir, as we approach the speed of light time slows down so does time stop for the person travelling at the speed of time or for a photon travelling at a speed of light?
Time only slows with speed, it doesn't stop
#Askabhijit
There is a belief that Earth is situated at head of Shesh Nag. Shri Balram is a Avatar of Sheshnag and Shri balram's another name is Sankarshan ( संकर्षण) which mean attraction. is it possible that our ancestor were talking about gravity in the name of Sankarshan.
No why would they use metaphor then ?
#AskAbhijt sir if black hole do not even allow light to escape from at then how often radiation is emitted by the Black hole and if space is expanding then why aren't the spaces between the atoms are increasing . Sir plz answer , I was asking this question for the first episode.
It's the boundary of black hole, called event horizon, which radiates energy and gravitational pull at this is lower than Black hole, it consists of matter revolving at high speed,
What if light photons collide , do they Pass through or radiate in form of heat
sir ... according to quantum mechanics perspective... will fire also have weight?
Sir I'm a high school student I'm confused if photon are massless so we can say it is not necessary for matter to have mass and volume as photon do not have???
Sir , isnt the mass of photons 0 only when they are not in motion, So that way when they are moving they have a certain mass and are therefore affected by gravity?
No...just think of if light which is made up of photons had even slightest of mass what it would have done at such a speed .. devastating 🙃
Where did you get the idea that gravity only affects things with mass
Namaskaram sir, from Childhood I've a question that if Earth is round or elliptical then how we humans and other organisms live on it feeling like it's flat and also why the water in oceans doesn't spill due to rounded surface. Sir please answer this I'll thankful to you always 🙏 #AskAbhijit
Bcz Earth's gravity is pulling everything towards it, and in space nothing is there which is applying any kind gravity on us, so we don't feel any levitation towards space, and other thing earth is so big, we can't earth as round from its surface, but if you will fly in a plane you can figure it, that's it
The dimension of Earth is huge in comparison to your size or the size of any man made object hence you only see a very miniscule part of it at any point in time like a near sighted person can only see only the small iteration of a large sequence. As you travel further away from the surface of Earth you will see its larger dimension and it's curvature or from earth itself if you get to see the horizon on the sea you can see its curvature. Also Earth is the largest object closest to us and hence we are bound to Earth, that includes huge bodies of water like seas and oceans. They cannot escape the gravity of Earth. Though because of the force of the next biggest celestial body close to Earth..The Moon, there are huge waves lifting out of the oceans and seas also known as tides.
Because energy equals momentum
#askabhijit may be a silly question but Sir, Just wondering that since our sun is getting older day by day.. and the energy emitted is reducing, Will there b any time when venus will become habitable and earth will become cold enough that life will cease to exist on it.. like might have happened with mars! 😑
Nope our sun will expand and very possibly engulf first four planets first then after some time it will start shrinking ..so Venus ........my friend as u know it today will be destroyed before Earth.
i asked this same question to my physics sir, he told me the gravity doesn't affect light lmao
this subject is recently added to honours degree.
#AskAbhijit Sir, please explain about the ITER project of France to generate energy by fusion and how it gonna solve the energy crisis.
Could it be a possibility that gravity classically defined as a force is actually the description of the spacetime field? The distortion of the spacetime field is influenced by the concentration of energy per unit volume.
To my knowledge there has been no experiment to verify the Energy-Momentum Tensor in Einsteins Field equations. Study in the area could provide insight to solve the 3 body problem.
#AskAbhijit plz discuss about Philadelphia experiment
#askabhijeet Sir How are Space and time effected by Gravity or forced by Gravity? Do they have mass too?
According to e=mc^2 every mass has equivalent
energy and every energy have equivalent mass but why we considered light (photons) have massless however they have high energy to travel
#AskAbhijit what happened when anti matter contact with light... Can its react and explode?
#askabhijit can you give any information on if *dragons* were real. And why do we see there influence in almost every culture?
Not sure about myself but.... Birds with teeth as in prehistoric era were supposedly seen as dragons and they would often gush out hot air out of their mouth... Which might be portrayed as fire....
Not sure but still.... Correct me if I'm wrong guys...
Sir we know light has momemtum ,but it doesn't have mass, doesn't momemtum requires mass?
#Askabhijit How did the matter ever existed @first ? ( beginning of universe)
#Askabhijit sir please explain the questions asked by Acharya Agnivrat naisthik ji on black hole and other cosmos discoveries, even Nasa was failed to answer him, and claims that he decoded Vedas and explained black holes and string theory
When I is asked this question to my Science teacher in class 8th i ended up standing outside my class.
Dark energie is light
How many photons of light can occupy any one space? Let's take any spot in space, since light from everything in space is sending photons through that one spot. Throw in star ejecta, gravity, cosmic radiation, subatomic particles....seems an awful lot of "stuff" occupies the same space. Makes you wonder, maybe no mass, then the gravity bending light around distant galaxies? Could be an optical illusion or another force. seems like you see it way off into the light years.
** एक ही जाति के लोग अछूत भी सछूत भी **
" मतलब जाति के कारण अस्पृश्यता नहीं थी "
सोर्स - अम्बेडकर हिंदी संपूर्ण वाड़मय vol- 4 page- 210.___ इस पर भी वीडियो बनाएं , ज्यादा से ज्यादा 30 sec की ।,,,
They don't, what we see is light reflected by all the trash orbiting a thing.
What if a dictator comes to power in India with a pure intention to restore the teachings of Vedas and the Hindu civilization in India?
He amends all the "bad" things of our colonial constitution and beurocracy, establish Gurukul system including modern science and computers and makes sanskrit the third national language.What will be the pros and cons of that?
The “curvature of spacetime” makes no sense. If the frame of reference by which things like straightness and curvature are measured is itself curved, then there’s no way to distinguish between straightness and curvature.
So, too, with the “expanding cosmos” nonsense. If literally everything is expanding, including our rulers with which we measure distance, then everything continues to be measured just as it was before.
Mach was correct. There is no such thing as being “at rest.” All motion is relative to all other objects. All paths of motion are curved/helical.
If Earth was somehow a square-shaped celestial body, they would not say 'curvature of spacetime' they would say 'the smooth edges then sharp 90 degree corners of spacetime'
To this day, 99.99% of STEM-educated people have not committed the time to come to grips with the exact physical nature of gravity. If Einstein, Dirac, Wheeler, Feynman, Heisenberg, Lorentz, Hawking, and so on were asked this question:
*_"What is the exact physical nature of gravity - and what are the constituents, if any, that occupy free space, that allow gravity to manifest?"_*
NONE OF THOSE 'HEROES OF PHYSICS' would be able to answer.
Do we know that for sure? YES WE DO. None of them - and none to this day have:
1) explained how all collections of atoms manifest gravity, even though Cavendish, in the year 1798 (yes, 225 years ago) proved experimentally that the smallest collections of atoms produce a gravity field
2) and none of them have put forth a means for creating artificial gravity
The HEROES OF PHYSICS are like shipbuilders who have never seen the ocean.
.
@@Greg_Chase Modern physics is unable to describe gravity because their cosmology, their metaphysical premises of the nature of the universe, don’t permit it. Gravity is a contraction of space itself. (EM radiation is it’s inverse: an expanding wave of space itself.)
I’m looking forward to artificial gravity. We’ll be able to construct vehicles that are pulled anywhere by it, like falling in any direction you choose.
@@hermes_logios A small group of us work at artificial gravity; our background is electrical engineering and physics. This was our first device:
1) a lamination (ie. layers) of thin aluminum, each layer separated by insulation, laid out horizontal on the workbench
2) a vertical magnetic field through the center of the lamination
3) radial, horizontal RF currents are induced in the lamination
This creates an E x B Lorentz force of the charged particles in the metal (the right hand rule, recall). The Lorentz force coherently sweeps the charged particles in the metal at the frequency of the RF fed to the device. We made alterations to the design by changing the dimensions of the lamination, and changing the applied RF frequency to induce resonance/standing waves across the metal.
Artificial magnetism (the electromagnet) was invented 200 years ago by William Sturgeon, and there's no reason artificial gravity should not be experimented with; that's how Sturgeon invented the electromagnet, by experimenting.
The only thing stopping it is - the idolizing of general relativity etc. that claims "immense mass" is the only way to create gravity.
The entire physics community suffers from "learned helplessness"
.
The right question is: is it proven experimentally that photons are massless?
Yes
@anatolytsinker5317 which experiment found it?
??
Stupid question.