Yellow: Inside American Trucking’s Largest Bankruptcy | WSJ What Went Wrong

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 เม.ย. 2024
  • Yellow is one of the oldest and biggest trucking companies in the U.S., but it collapsed in late July after years of ballooning debt and a standoff with the Teamsters union. The freight carrier company filed for bankruptcy after 99 years in business. But what events led to the freight company’s downfall?
    WSJ explains the factors that helped drive the 99-year-old trucking giant’s growth and details the factors that have led Yellow to face bankruptcy.
    0:00 Yellow’s struggles
    0:48 Yellow’s background
    1:58 Merger mistakes and stalled profits
    4:11 Covid government bailout
    5:03 Compounding factors
    7:03 What’s next?
    What Went Wrong explores the challenging conditions and decisions that led to a company's downturn.
    #Trucking #Transportation #WSJ

ความคิดเห็น • 1.4K

  • @wouldntyouliketoknow9891
    @wouldntyouliketoknow9891 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +189

    I ran a business (albeit a much smaller one) where my primary strategy was low cost. I eventually went out of business too. Low cost is NEVER a winning strategy. Compete on service, compete on product quality, compete on added value, but never try to compete on low cost.

    • @zvonemane2534
      @zvonemane2534 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Agree. But what would be the added value in trucking industry? Except self driving trucks which is exoensive and still risky?

    • @wouldntyouliketoknow9891
      @wouldntyouliketoknow9891 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      @@zvonemane2534 self driving trucks dont add any value. The load being transported from origin to destination is already expected. Unless self driving makes that happen faster or better, the details of the driving situation doesn't add value. A better example of adding value in trucking would be a load crating/palleting service, or expedited delivery, or load handling services, etc.

    • @bertgrau3934
      @bertgrau3934 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@zvonemane2534
      That's one place the teamsters refuse , no auto driving trucks.

    • @bertgrau3934
      @bertgrau3934 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      ​@@wouldntyouliketoknow9891
      That's where you're incorrect, a self driving truck doesn't need a driver, therefore, it saves the company money thus adding value.

    • @wouldntyouliketoknow9891
      @wouldntyouliketoknow9891 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@bertgrau3934 To the trucking company, not to the customer. When we say compete on value added products and services, we are talking about from the customer's point of view.

  • @DushevnaSepsa
    @DushevnaSepsa 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +152

    As someone working in trucking for 4-5 years, many, maaaany small companies are going under and its getting worse.

    • @fauxque5057
      @fauxque5057 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

      Bidenomics. And his regulations.

    • @gotwalk
      @gotwalk 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

      You should have been around in the chaotic Reagan union busting years watching truckers go out of business daily. Horrible event watching truckers go independent taking on debt then working endlessly not making a living.

    • @mgp870
      @mgp870 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      @@gotwalk my father owned his own truck during the Reagan presidency. He was leased to Bekins Van Lines out of Hillside Illinois. My father owned the truck and pulled their trailer. Ran 48 states and Canada. He supported a wife and three kids. We lived in Los Angeles CA. My two sisters went to college. One attended UCLA and the other Fresno St. We did just fine. My father retired at the age of 63. Yes my mother did work part time. I never went to college. That was my choice. I worked in manufacturing and that was a union shop. The company was Price Pfister located in Pacoima CA. We made faucets for the kitchen, bathroom and shower. Union work wasn't for me. If I had a dollar for every time I heard phrase I PAYED MY DUES. I would be a rich man. Eventually I became a Locksmith and I like my job.

    • @piglet7943
      @piglet7943 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

      @@mgp870at the end of the day it was the unions who gave us workers a lot of the rights that we enjoy today. I’ve worked non Union my entire life but understand the contributions that unions have done for workers. You can work independently or union if you choose but I don’t like union busters. Those people are for profits over people.

    • @omegamanxxx
      @omegamanxxx 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@fauxque5057 Nonsense... sounds like they made too many acquisitions then got hit by the financial collapse. This is not political so why make it one.

  • @gotwalk
    @gotwalk 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +97

    A board of directors grotesquely failed this company. All executives and board of directors needed to be turned over after 1st acquisition.

    • @ElectricVehiclesAreGoodF-ti7xd
      @ElectricVehiclesAreGoodF-ti7xd 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      Top heads kept the 700 Million bailout and retired on it. Manipulated the books

    • @user-gz8bq7wr7i
      @user-gz8bq7wr7i 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      We also have to add the minor role the corrupt Teamsters played in destroying these workers lives.

    • @allenatkins2263
      @allenatkins2263 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      They should have put Hunter on the board and they would be fine now.

    • @samsonsoturian6013
      @samsonsoturian6013 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Quit assigning blame

    • @Urziel99
      @Urziel99 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@user-gz8bq7wr7i So it's corrupt to stand up for your members when they've been lied to for 14 years? Typical right wing hack.

  • @deeharp
    @deeharp 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +299

    Expect many more American Companies, that have done the same thing just like many that have already collapsed. They stopped being in the actual business of trucking and got into the business of growth. Growth allows them to inflate numbers make the stock price go up and let the shareholders cash out and let the company die slow. While everyone acts shocked that it happened. The people in Charge got rich and everyone else got a pat on the back. So many more to come.

    • @combatvolta
      @combatvolta 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      You said it all ,that was the reason

    • @spechund7109
      @spechund7109 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      And F unions. I hope all union related industries go out of business.

    • @darrylturner2611
      @darrylturner2611 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      Yellow received $700 million in PPE money, what did they do with the cash?

    • @creekwalker62
      @creekwalker62 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      Greed, it's always about the insatiable greed and the golden parachutes.

    • @arthursmith8771
      @arthursmith8771 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      @@spechund7109 Troll alert!

  • @cessna172ident
    @cessna172ident 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +132

    I’ll miss seeing Yellow and YRC trucks at the place I work at. Used them many times to ship ground freight throughout the country and never had a problem.

    • @PirateD.KingLuffy
      @PirateD.KingLuffy 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I would see them at my job a few months ago and summer came and never saw them again🤷🏿‍♂️

    • @edwardgaines6561
      @edwardgaines6561 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      The Unions are to blame here.

    • @charlesgale4257
      @charlesgale4257 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Never had any experience with them but they always drove safely when I saw them on the highway.

    • @mikemccarthy6939
      @mikemccarthy6939 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@edwardgaines6561 negative the unions have given several concessions over the years this was and is a upper management problem

    • @Urziel99
      @Urziel99 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@edwardgaines6561 NO they aren't, you're just programmed by Fox news to hate workers standing up for themselves. But hey, maybe you are okay with being led to for 14 years about getting concessions you made in 2009 back and it not happening despite the 700 million dollar bailout Jared Kushner arranged for them.

  • @Brett636
    @Brett636 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +102

    As an outsider watching this train wreck I found this video to be spot on. As always the buck stops at the top and those at the head of this company made poor decision after poor decision and it took 20 years, but the inevitable finally occurred. My condolences to those unemployed due too this mess.

    • @thomasgirty6397
      @thomasgirty6397 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Sooooo , the union had NO input for those 20 yrs??? ill bet the dues were never missed. blame ALL THE SUITS WHO DONT REALLY CARE ABOUT THE GUYS WORKING.

    • @bertgrau3934
      @bertgrau3934 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      One thing not mentioned, how many seen the wreck coming and bailed before it went out of business? I know of at least 200 drivers, and no one else was smart enough to see that mess coming?

    • @supchief9
      @supchief9 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@thomasgirty6397 One COO pay went from $300k in 2020 to $5.3 million in 2021. The CEO pay increased around $800k - not to mention he has sold about 60% of his stock since 2014. They want EVERYONE to blame the unions while not looking at the top executives pay.

    • @beepboopbeepp
      @beepboopbeepp 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@thomasgirty6397 nothing is black or white, but those major acquisition is clearly what killed the company. Not the unions. They bit off more then they could chew while also not changing their businessmodel

    • @jerryjones4971
      @jerryjones4971 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They are greedy and employees pay the price.

  • @takehandleandshoveuparse
    @takehandleandshoveuparse 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +150

    Their sign said yellow but it was ORANGE. Who would confidently invest in a company that was color-blind?

    • @user-fb4zo8wd5n
      @user-fb4zo8wd5n 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Well, the yellow traffic light is orange to me.

    • @412hwc
      @412hwc 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      😂😂😂 best comment ever

    • @followerofjesuschrist.
      @followerofjesuschrist. 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      "From that time Jesus began to preach, and to say, Repent: for the kingdom of heaven is at hand." Matthew 4:17
      "Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also." Matthew 5:38-39
      "And when thou prayest, thou shalt not be as the hypocrites are: for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and in the corners of the streets, that they may be seen of men. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward. But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou hast shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly." Matthew 6:5-6|

    • @TheNippoo
      @TheNippoo 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      im so sick of this overused joke.

    • @StonesAndSand
      @StonesAndSand 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Finally...this was what I was looking for!

  • @samuelross9884
    @samuelross9884 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +129

    I blame the company. They clearly did not manage the company well.

    • @CBrown
      @CBrown 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      You have to blame decades of management, most of which left the company years ago. Current management was doing everything in it's power to correct the inefficiencies that their predecessors left behind and were the cause of the cash bleed. Of course they weren't perfect but the IBT was so angry about the past that they blocked almost all efforts to make things better at the expense of their drivers. Here's an undisputable fact: If the IBT had accepted any deal, those drivers would still be working today but they preferred to let the company die, simply because they could, rather than accepting even any offer to keep 30,000 people employed. Regardless of how you feel about Yellow or the executives, help me understand the logic there? Because even if the only offer was yet another "compromise" as O'Brien puts it, when the other option is all of your people lose their jobs, what reason do you have to decline it? Those drivers could still leave the company if they so chose if they didn't like the deal. As it stands now, they have nothing and many of them are very upset about the situation, especially because it's not likely that they'll find new union jobs, that pay as well, or offer the same benefits. Everyone lost here, including you and me as taxpayers. Had the IBT simply accepted something and let Yellow try, at least these guys would have another year of employment, Yellow would be able to pay back at lease some of the loan they got, and it's at least possible the proposed changes that the IBT was so against would have solved the financial woes. This was dumb. If you disagree, please, explain the logic behind the IBT's decision to just let a company die and 30,000 people lose their jobs when all they had to do was sign a contract where they'd get something rather than nothing.

    • @samuelross9884
      @samuelross9884 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@CBrown I assume the IBT assumed that the driver's would collect unemployment for a while and find work at a more lucrative carrier at a higher rate. The assumption is logical.

    • @fauxque5057
      @fauxque5057 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      I blame the Union

    • @gotwalk
      @gotwalk 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      The operations were poorly organized and run. Wonder how many of those execs own luxury 2nd and 3rd homes in Florida and/or Arizona.

    • @gotwalk
      @gotwalk 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@fauxque5057troll?

  • @cheesemaster113
    @cheesemaster113 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +369

    RIP to all the honest hardworking truckers who lost their pensions

    • @Vizzi12
      @Vizzi12 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +45

      A huge chunk of them are actually protected, their pensions were sold to a managing firm

    • @johnblanton2522
      @johnblanton2522 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +52

      The pension is not tied to the company. Pension funds are separate. They can go to work at Abf and keep growing the contribution.

    • @mattstaebel3543
      @mattstaebel3543 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

      What about the hard working office employees?

    • @Vizzi12
      @Vizzi12 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      @@johnblanton2522 not always, some companies manage pensions internally, yellow did

    • @alexrebmann1253
      @alexrebmann1253 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

      @@johnblanton2522 What is sad about the pension is that Yellow stopped contributing in 2009. What did they do with all that money, plus 15% pay cut, and 1 week paid vacation pay that teamster gave up to help the company.

  • @jeffbutterfield241
    @jeffbutterfield241 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +45

    This is very reminiscent of the collapse of Consolidated Freightways in 2002.

    • @petergray2712
      @petergray2712 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Kinda. But there was a lot more management skullduggery in that case. Ownership and management had already set up a non-union company (Con-Way) in anticipation of Consolidated's collapse, meaning that they deliberately ran that company off the cliff.

    • @jeffbutterfield241
      @jeffbutterfield241 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@petergray2712 That's one way to look at it. However, Consolidated Freightways had been spun off 6 years on it's own without debt, while (Con-Way) took the massive pile of debt that had been amassed between 1990-1996 from the acquistion of Emery. I put more blame of CF's demise squarely on the Board of Directors for not recognizing that it was in trouble sooner.

    • @bertgrau3934
      @bertgrau3934 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@jeffbutterfield241
      I disagree, the management at CF didn't like the Teamsters. Like another gentleman said, they started Con-Way to takevover the hauling business and get rid of the union. It worked.

  • @oby-1607
    @oby-1607 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    I worked for a company that got top heavy and ignored the people that got them there. The workers.
    Today, the company doesn't exist and the hole left behind them was quickly filled by their competitors. Companies have to work as a unit, and not as if by some crown looking down on its workers. There's always a price for that.

  • @billyblackmon4796
    @billyblackmon4796 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    the leaders at Roadway were very smart selling to Yellow, forming Roadway Package System, selling that to Fed Ex.

  • @HungerSTR1KE
    @HungerSTR1KE 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +143

    This is absolutely ridiculous. A year ago all you could read was headline after headline about how there weren't enough truck drivers and how much freight was being left at docks and without transportation to its final destination. Now the 4th largest LTL company can't run itself well and files for bankruptcy because not even the deep concessions the Teamsters made are enough to keep it running. This sounds like a business poorly run for many, many years. We don't have a "labor shortage" we have a shortage of well run companies that pay a living wage and follow labor laws. There never was a labor shortage, just an over-abundance of greed-driven executives willing to slash at labor until it's not worth it to work the jobs they offer.

    • @hydrocarbon8272
      @hydrocarbon8272 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

      And yet, these failing companies are being run by people making millions per year. More in a year than any of their workers will get from the company in a lifetime.
      "Opps, my bad! I guess I'll use my mountain of cash to take a long vacation while I find another business to trash." -execs, usually

    • @Djamonja
      @Djamonja 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      You should start a well run trucking company then if you think it's so easy?

    • @bigbubba4314
      @bigbubba4314 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      It sure sounds like a simple thing to run a profitable company. I’m shocked that no one on the leadership team of the Teamsters has opted to start their own trucking company and provide reliable, good paying jobs to all of the Teamsters.

    • @williambrandondavis6897
      @williambrandondavis6897 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      There is a labor shortage. We have plenty of people to do the work. The problem is most of those workers are not good employees. What one guy in 1950 could do in 8 hours now takes 4 people. It's because people have become too privileged and lazy.
      Production efficiency is at an all time low. Workers today lack the discipline and commitment. Your average worker doesn't even keep a job for more than a year at a time these days. That's pathetic. Try running a business and see how your perspective changes.

    • @nick1801
      @nick1801 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@bigbubba4314 Union members are notorious for having access to vast amounts of personal capital and/or access to capital markets 🤣

  • @HerbertAtkinson
    @HerbertAtkinson 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +67

    Being a retired roadway express guy not seeing any roadway yellow trucks & trailers on the road now reminds me of when CF went under it's a very odd feeling.

    • @jeffbutterfield241
      @jeffbutterfield241 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      I was just commenting above about how this reminds me of that. I was an employee at CF when it went under working at the Vancouver headquarters. My dad worked there for 30 years, started months before I was born and I was there when it went under. Broke my heart.

    • @vicpetrishak7705
      @vicpetrishak7705 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Pacific Intermountaim Express and Spector were also good solvent carriers at one time ! And not let us forget Monfort !

    • @phillyphil1513
      @phillyphil1513 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      here in the Northeast: Jevic then New Century (2 inter-related companies).

  • @alexrebmann1253
    @alexrebmann1253 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +74

    What is not mentioned in this video is that in 2013 Yellow was talking to ABF about buying ABF. That did not go well with the teamsters.

    • @bngr_bngr
      @bngr_bngr 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Tell tell a lot about who killed the company.

    • @SgtJoeSmith
      @SgtJoeSmith 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      mob run teamsters killed company

    • @kk4649k
      @kk4649k 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Brainwashed Americans thinking it’s the middle class workers who killed the company. (The workers ARE the union)
      The workers took concessions year after year. When is enough. Don’t blame the workers for NOT wanting to accept a pay cut again just so the upper management can keep making stupid decisions and live like a king.

    • @Bash70
      @Bash70 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      @@SgtJoeSmith how do those leather boots taste?

    • @SgtJoeSmith
      @SgtJoeSmith 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@Bash70 did you know my top branch managers make $5 million a year?

  • @quilino59
    @quilino59 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    I was a truck driver for New Penn Motor Express, one of the best local carrier on the North-east, until YRC took over, every thing went downhill, been in the union for so many years I had no choice but to stick around working for 15% reduction of my income for 14 years, finally on march 2022 I took early retirement which I don't regret I'm doing better than before no pressures of been a slave for monopoly corporations.

  • @rjuhl2007
    @rjuhl2007 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +56

    Had a couple of Yellow trucks on the yard at work to come through the shop. Then they got towed away, we scratched our heads but now we know why.

    • @jjthefed
      @jjthefed 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      lol Maybe they were taking them in to actually paint them yellow.

    • @angelgjr1999
      @angelgjr1999 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I’ve seen yellow trailers dumped on the side of the highway 😅

  • @bronxtaskforce01
    @bronxtaskforce01 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

    The federal government needs to investigate where all that money went. Where did people's retirement funds go?

    • @gund89123
      @gund89123 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      PPP loans were all scam.
      Initially there were strict conditions on who gets the loans, but congress watered them down so that they can distribute the money.

    • @ronblack7870
      @ronblack7870 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      paying wages

    • @PirateD.KingLuffy
      @PirateD.KingLuffy 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Bruh it’s not rocket science. Those higher executives took most of the money that wasn’t debt

    • @FreeHat
      @FreeHat 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They still have their retirement funds. It didn't go anywhere. Yellow did not control pension funds, they just paid into the accounts.

    • @johnnycab8986
      @johnnycab8986 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Probably the Union heads ran off with it.

  • @highwayred480
    @highwayred480 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    I remember when yellow bought roadway and the news made me sick 😫 then when they bought Holland I knew then they would file for bankruptcy to kill Union membership like they wanted to in 1994

  • @DotADBX
    @DotADBX 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +87

    why they didn't just sell off assets after the crash is beyond me, they should have aggressively downsized till the market corrected.

    • @westsacramentowastetrucks5386
      @westsacramentowastetrucks5386 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      No one at Yellow Corporate was that smart sadly, they didn’t exactly care where the business went. Especially with the high dollar bailouts they’ve received that would’ve definitely saved them had they not taken MASSIVE bonuses.

    • @arthurtomczak8474
      @arthurtomczak8474 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Just wasted money on small depot in St. George Utah . Finished in time to lock the gates .

    • @jmd1743
      @jmd1743 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@westsacramentowastetrucks5386 Demise of Yellow reminds of the collapse of many former retailer stores that built too many locations.

    • @Xeonerable
      @Xeonerable 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      In American capitalism intentional downsizing is basically a sin, if its not growth growth growth all the time then you may as well not exist in their eyes.

    • @DotADBX
      @DotADBX 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @Xeonerable it's called strategic downsizing and yes it May be a sin but sometimes u gotta cut off the arm to save the body

  • @Sacto1654
    @Sacto1654 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +89

    I think the increasing emphasis on intermodal transport effectively doomed Yellow. I mean, look at how some trucking companies have interline agreements to move freight on longer runs via doublestack container trains (one of the first was J. B. Hunt in 1989). And some companies like Amazon and even Walmart started to build their own fleets of long-distance trucks, too.

    • @RafaelW8
      @RafaelW8 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      What is intermodal transport

    • @germangarciajr4249
      @germangarciajr4249 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Shipping containers, for ship and train transportation

    • @rooseveltrolland4903
      @rooseveltrolland4903 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@RafaelW8Zzßßßà

    • @alquinn8576
      @alquinn8576 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      intermodal is slow though, and is a more direct competitor with full truckload

    • @robertshelton3796
      @robertshelton3796 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So Democrats will forgive individual student debt for people who got meaningless degrees but won't forgive the debt of a company which employs 30,000 blue collar workers.

  • @HevyDuty2ok
    @HevyDuty2ok 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Yellow has a bunch of bankers running it! They had no business buying Roadway, Holland, Preston, or another company! What they needed to do is run their own business and make money for all involved including the drivers! Instead the banker they hired to bankrupt all these other companies lost the business for their company! I remember many of my customers telling me they would never use Yellow again and there you have the moral of the story! Keep you nose out of other peoples business!!

  • @red---paulvanravenswaay2247
    @red---paulvanravenswaay2247 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    "When things dont make sense, theres usually a reason.......and its usually not a good one"
    The infamous Bob Allen.

  • @jimlong8077
    @jimlong8077 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +67

    As a broker when I need cheap LTL I could always get a better rate than Yellow. When I need quality service I could always do better than Yellow. Long hold times and poor service. Theyve been on my "do not use" list since 2020. It is what it is. And I hate it for seeing their brand since I was a kid watching big trucks roll by from the day-care.

    • @bcalm22
      @bcalm22 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How can i get in touch with you ?

    • @nileshalinger
      @nileshalinger 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      you sir no longer have that problem - sleep well

    • @huckfin1598
      @huckfin1598 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@nileshalingerneither do the union employees. They don’t have to complain and demand anything. They’re all unemployed!

    • @killer2600
      @killer2600 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@huckfin1598 It appears to be what the union wanted; Resign or get laid off they both leave you unemployed.

    • @carterburpee8499
      @carterburpee8499 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      They were an absolute logistics nightmare for the company I work for. Every time we used them the truck was always late by weeks. Cannot say I'm sad to see them go, but I feel for all the guys who lost their living. Hopefully they can move on to better companies that'll treat them right.

  • @nandisaand5287
    @nandisaand5287 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

    I had a job where I did allot of LTL shipping (usually 1 or 2 skids at a time) in the mid- to late-00's. I knew YRC was in big trouble, and WOULD NOT use them, for fear they'd fold shop while my freight was in their system.

  • @jeffreyz810
    @jeffreyz810 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I worked at Yellow and saw first hand the freight levels going to nothing! Im sure all the executives at Yellow got a golden parachute for there inability to manage while the workers got a job well done message before hitting the streets.. Doesn't seem right ...$ $2,000 a month Cobra from the union medical plan..And made too much for Affordable Care Act medical ..What about the families?? Sad!!

  • @Shane-en2sq
    @Shane-en2sq 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

    Offered to pay its employees more, blatant lie. Attending the local company meeting, their proposal would have resulted in a 30% pay cut, by reducing my miles. When was the last time you heard anybody taking a 30% pay decrease in any profession?

    • @bngr_bngr
      @bngr_bngr 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Yet now you lost your job.

    • @02nupe
      @02nupe 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      @@bngr_bngr you still didn't answer the question....#deflecting

    • @solosix3991
      @solosix3991 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      ​@@02nupe[nupe nupe]
      Of course he is. I can guess how he votes too. It's always the working guy's fault and never the company that got bailed out, subsidized and negotiated with (through the unions of all people), and STILL ran the company into the ground

    • @bngr_bngr
      @bngr_bngr 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@02nupe what question?

    • @mr.stonerUDX714
      @mr.stonerUDX714 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      every day

  • @kingloc6042
    @kingloc6042 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +137

    Could it be an aggressive corporate strategy to clean house, change the name, mortgage the brand to pay the debt, and start fresh without union employees?
    🤷🏾 That has happened before too.

    • @kingloc6042
      @kingloc6042 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

      Freight rates will increase because of this.
      I just want to know where the trump bailout money went. $708m is a lot.

    • @phildirt3
      @phildirt3 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      See CF

    • @RuStOlIuM420
      @RuStOlIuM420 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes

    • @samsonsoturian6013
      @samsonsoturian6013 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Why not? Screw Unions.

    • @phillyphil1513
      @phillyphil1513 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      A: no. because: "Occam's Razor"... All things being equal, the simplest answer tends to be the correct one.

  • @pamelahomeyer748
    @pamelahomeyer748 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    It borrowed too many times on its asset value and the bankers are just as much to blame

    • @samsonsoturian6013
      @samsonsoturian6013 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Bankers didn't force them to take loans.

    • @phillyphil1513
      @phillyphil1513 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      indeed, same as the Collapse of the US Housing Market, certainly can't overlook the "ENABLING" element to all this.

    • @samsonsoturian6013
      @samsonsoturian6013 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@phillyphil1513 that never happened

    • @ZboeC5
      @ZboeC5 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@samsonsoturian6013 Uh...When banks loan money to people that THEY KNOW can't repay...it is enabling pure and simple. They did it because they didn't care because they would then bundle all of those bad loans and sell them on the market as securities. Hence why the market collapsed. The Government of course is the reason it was allowed to happen. Bill Clinton actually signed the law that started the whole thing. It just took some years before people realized how bad the problem really was and by the time it did it was too late to do anything about. So yes the banks enabled it. Spurred on by poor Government policy sure but they fanned those flames. So yes it _did_ happen as a matter of fact.

  • @GreatNW
    @GreatNW 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

    As someone who's actually worked with yellow and the companies that owns that have become yellow I am not actually upset about this their drivers were rude their trucks were unkept and most of the time our product was damaged. Throw on top of that the local FedEx LTL is closing down in my area and this puts the company in a very tough position.

    • @jayschafer1760
      @jayschafer1760 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Exactly. Yellow's damage rates, on time performance, and customer service were all abysmal. It's going to hurt shippers to have to pay a LOT more, but at least they won't be dealing with service that bad.

    • @chriswong9158
      @chriswong9158 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      New transportation model is coming: 24/7, no insurance, no SSI, no benefit, no break, most important no Union
      Drone drivers & delivery service with no labor complaint.

    • @goxyeagle8446
      @goxyeagle8446 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      More money for other trucking companies 👏🏻

    • @BAS3BALL_bat
      @BAS3BALL_bat 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😂 Yep. And this opinion is why they went under. It is counter-productive to hate the base of what makes the company.

  • @HUMPFunkWorthy
    @HUMPFunkWorthy 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I was a dock worker for Yellow. Completely mismanaged, huge corporate bonuses, huge corporate salaries. They would fly me to other states, pay me per diem, put me up in hotels, pay for stake dinners… because they couldn’t hire anybody on. Because of management’s perspective towards organized employees. Long live the Teamstersz

  • @GH-oi2jf
    @GH-oi2jf 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +55

    So overexpansion killed the company. Greed. Management wasn’t satisfied to be just one of a few large trucking companies. They wanted to be the biggest, which they could only be by swallowing the competition. Stupidity. Some people automatically blame unions for business failures, when it is usually poor management.

    • @darrylturner2611
      @darrylturner2611 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      This is a very intelligent point!!

    • @dfor
      @dfor 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      It wasn’t exactly overexpansion. The leader in the LTL industry is FedEx Freight which has been running 15-30% profit margins and expanding like crazy for years and is still making tons of money in its LTL division. But they actually charge what it costs to be profitable. Unlike YRC. Their biggest problem was that they had a reputation for being a low cost carrier which also had a low value of service. They were slow, and much more likely to damage your freight. But that’s the risk you take paying half as much for your freight to move. And as such they could never justifiably raise their prices.
      All that and other companies paid their workers a lot more than YRC and their subsidiaries ever did. Old Dominion and FXF have their top pay rates nearly 30% higher than USF paid, and 20% higher than Yellow. Yet they were still profitable while yellow failed.
      With that it’s obviously not the unions fault when they don’t even make as much as the non union shops. It was entirely the yellow business model that screwed themselves.

    • @mikerundle8188
      @mikerundle8188 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Yellow, a badly managed company, buying its larger competitor...what could possibly go wrong?

    • @g600f700
      @g600f700 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's easy. Get Yellow's balance sheet for the past 20 years, look at which team makes money, which team burns money and check their trends/patterns. If the CEO or leadership is to blame, get rid of them asap. After a few changes in leadership and the business is still not improving, maybe it's not the leadership, something else. It's the same principle running financial planning in other successful business.

    • @samsonsoturian6013
      @samsonsoturian6013 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Come now. Thousands of companies take lots of risks like this but we're only angry at the ones that lay people off

  • @williamd7161
    @williamd7161 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    Growing by means of aquisitions is a big big red flag and in the end it leads to yellow's downfall.

    • @lordgarion514
      @lordgarion514 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Not really.
      Growing by acquisition is the main way big companies grow.
      Apple owns 125 companies.
      Microsoft owns 225.
      Google owns 200.
      Intel owns over 100 companies.
      Even Walmart owns about 25 companies......

    • @lordgarion514
      @lordgarion514 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      And what lead to Yellow's money problems,was the worldwide economic collapse in 2008, AND THEN covid in 2019.
      No company could have known about either of those happening......
      What killed Yellow was the greedy union.
      After th

    • @bngr_bngr
      @bngr_bngr 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That’s not true. This collapse was the fault of the union.

    • @Robbedem
      @Robbedem 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@lordgarion514 the companies you mention have money, Yellow didn't have money, so they bought with money from loans.
      And economic downturns happen about every 10 to 20 years. So while not possible to predict exactly, companies need to be prepared for something like that.

  • @juanfranflanslife5401
    @juanfranflanslife5401 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +48

    About time they stop using what happened in 2020 as a excuse to not make payments

    • @nobull4414
      @nobull4414 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Because it's the truth. Yellow, unlike XPO and ArcBest, doesn't have multi-billion dollar holding companies and Old Dominion, owned by Schneider National propping them financially.

    • @SgtJoeSmith
      @SgtJoeSmith 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@nobull4414 its not right when a company pays employees more than it makes and has to take loans to keep up with payroll

    • @alexrebmann1253
      @alexrebmann1253 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      @@SgtJoeSmith didn't stop CEOs from getting raises and bonuses.

    • @SgtJoeSmith
      @SgtJoeSmith 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@alexrebmann1253 of the teamsters who made $30 million profit off yellow drivers a year!

    • @nobull4414
      @nobull4414 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@SgtJoeSmith Yellows problem is that took on debt through acquisitions that they (Yellow) couldn't manage.

  • @brtecson
    @brtecson 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Why didn't they just.... >>>RAISE PRICES

  • @edsloan8535
    @edsloan8535 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Quickest way to see how well a company is run, is to simply look at their parking lot.

    • @E38vip
      @E38vip 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Gonna check the parking lot now that you mention it use to work there…

  • @el-hp1lj
    @el-hp1lj 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Costco Wholesale is sucking up many of the drivers that are near Costco distribution hubs. Costco is growing and expanding their fleets

  • @The.Dude.Abides.
    @The.Dude.Abides. 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    “We want to be the low cost option amount our competitors while still maintaining union employees.” Can’t understand how this insane strategy didn’t work… 🤦‍♂️

  • @Xeonerable
    @Xeonerable 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    I bet the C-suite made out pretty well, companies failing only hurts the people at the bottom.

    • @lukerinderknecht2982
      @lukerinderknecht2982 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Very true

    • @Vizzi12
      @Vizzi12 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      C-suite made it out with 12 weeks of severance pay, anyone below them made it out with 2 weeks

    • @davecramer9725
      @davecramer9725 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They surely should not get 12 weeks for what they did give them nothing

    • @samsonsoturian6013
      @samsonsoturian6013 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's silly. Managers were the major shareholders, and those shares are now worthless.

  • @quantumimperfections2550
    @quantumimperfections2550 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    @Sacto1654 made a great point that the increasing emphasis on intermodal transport was leaving Yellow behind. I'd add the extreme demand to make logistics prices as close to zero as possible a pain point for all logistics companies.

  • @parienting802
    @parienting802 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

    Not only management or the Union this this. I worked at Yellow too and I saw how drivers and dock workers just milked the company as well. Sad that people think they can milk a company with no consequences.

    • @ShidaiTaino
      @ShidaiTaino 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Employers and employees want to exploit each other for maximum benefit isnt new

    • @DocSpengler
      @DocSpengler 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Found a beancounter

    • @SuperTransmission
      @SuperTransmission 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      My brother was a teamster he worked so slow you couldn't see him move.

    • @AdamBechtol
      @AdamBechtol 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      p@@SuperTransmission

  • @phillyphil1513
    @phillyphil1513 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    good breakdown WSJ, i'm liking your coverage of these topics (short and sweet). 🤙

  • @NTATchannelNickTaylor
    @NTATchannelNickTaylor 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I remember when Yellow absorbed Roadway, I was one of their towing contractors here in S. Texas. One thing I remember vividly Roadway trucks and trailers were pure 🗑🚽. I don't see how the drivers dealt with running those junk wagons. Yellow had better equipment but providing service for them was sketchy from pickup to payment. Cut them off at the beginning of the Coof...

  • @semperfidelis1550
    @semperfidelis1550 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I work in distribution and Yellow was the cheapest and the worse carrier. I stopped using them because they were undependable and had bad customer service. I gladly paid more to avoid the headache. They seemed very poorly managed.

    • @boristheamerican2938
      @boristheamerican2938 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What do you expect from the cheapest carrier? First rate service?

    • @semperfidelis1550
      @semperfidelis1550 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@boristheamerican2938 No, but not terrible service.

  • @paule8536
    @paule8536 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Bill Zollars , a former CEO of Yellow laid the groundwork for this disaster! Complete incompetence.

    • @boristheamerican2938
      @boristheamerican2938 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Hes on the USPS board now appointed by Trump Drain the swamp. MAGA

  • @antoinepageau8336
    @antoinepageau8336 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I worked for Yellow in the 90’s it was introduction to office work (hated it). Back then we were using a computer system strait out of the 70’s! Management had been neglecting this company for over 30 years. The real question we should be asking is how can the system let such a poor player go on for so long. How many tens of thousands will loose their pensions because of this?

  • @thetowndrunk988
    @thetowndrunk988 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Yellow had more than 12,000 trucks. That is correct. However, they did NOT have more than 12,000 long haul trucks. That graphic is incorrect.

  • @appomattoxross6751
    @appomattoxross6751 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    With any company that is in trouble: Just find the company headquarters and look for the expensive works of art on the walls. That's the signal to leave.

    • @Vizzi12
      @Vizzi12 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      When apple was building its HQ, they used a glass that has to be chemically created by burning two gasses together to create such a high standard of purity, there is zero point to it but it’s insanely expensive.
      Google has some of the most insanely developed buildings and amenities.
      Those two companies are just fine

    • @appomattoxross6751
      @appomattoxross6751 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Correction. I should have said "most companies" and not "any company".@@Vizzi12

    • @christophero1969
      @christophero1969 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@Vizzi12 Apple and Google claim depreciation and deferred construction costs on their taxes, Duh. You cannot, as a business do that with art.

    • @Comm0ut
      @Comm0ut 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Vizzi12 Apple and Google have literal billions to burn on toys and reasons to coddle their highly skilled highly mobile workforce. OTOH blowing cash on shiny objects is not for unprofitable companies. There is no shortage of office drones.

  • @daleducheneaux7726
    @daleducheneaux7726 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Yellow went from 26 percent market share to 9 percent in 15 years. Management is awful and that is why this company had to file bankruptcy.

  • @Potatofarmer1898
    @Potatofarmer1898 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    YRC Always damaged our freight. Compared to SAIA or any other company, by a country mile I had more complaints for damaged freight with YRC than with anyone else.

  • @Bill-cb4bh
    @Bill-cb4bh 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I like how yrc companies competed against each other

  • @lih-fk8by
    @lih-fk8by 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +95

    The real problem is letting all these private companies grow to the point that they become the public's problem when they fail

    • @randyosborne3971
      @randyosborne3971 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Or the real problem, no bad company in this country files Chapter 7.

    • @Tmb1112
      @Tmb1112 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Economies of scale means that everything gets cheaper the larger companies become. Don’t see that as much of a problem.

    • @TankEnMate
      @TankEnMate 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@Tmb1112 The biggest problem is leveraged buyouts, i.e. borrowing money to buy competitors, if interest rates go up? BOOM! Or in the words of Steve Eisman (one of the guys who saw the 2008 crash coming) "They mistook leverage for genius".

    • @lih-fk8by
      @lih-fk8by 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@Tmb1112 if by everything you mean wages you're correct and I and everyone who works for a living does see it as a problem

    • @DSAK55
      @DSAK55 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      That is the essences of Capitalism: profits are Private, losses are Public

  • @RailFireProductions
    @RailFireProductions 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This is similar to the Penn Central bankruptcy, only with trucks.

  • @roinas12
    @roinas12 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Over the last couple of years of dealing with Yellow, its not hard to understand why. Their employees are union and they act horribly to customers. Not moving a shipment 1" further than they think they should not carring whether or not a customer can move if from that location. When asked, they give tons of attitide. I finally had it with being treated so poorly I tried to get the driver's name, but he kept sheilding his ID. I finally got his name and his response was, nothing will happen. I'm union! This type of entiled attitue drove potential customers away. Now I know this won't be every driver, but it was every driver I came accoss.

  • @order9066
    @order9066 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Solid presentation.

  • @jbtallguy
    @jbtallguy 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

    The people blaming the workers have no idea what they are talking about. The amount these guys gave up in the last couple decades just to keep this company alive is insane. It was entirely corporate greed, and bad management. Y’all need to stop licking those boots. It won’t make you rich too.

    • @GeorgeChuy
      @GeorgeChuy 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The business model of low cost and expansion by acquisition might be a wrong one from the very beginning. The struggle between the board and the union seems by comparison, an irrelevant one.

    • @u686st7
      @u686st7 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      The union bent over backwards for Yellow for 15 years with concessions and givebacks. I know guys that quit Yellow to go to non-union carriers for more money.

    • @cyclopsvision6370
      @cyclopsvision6370 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      the teamsters didn't give anything up, all they did was demand more and more and more and more until they broke their toy

    • @gund89123
      @gund89123 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@cyclopsvision6370numbers please.

    • @sdvten
      @sdvten 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@cyclopsvision6370 Yep. The union guys think if they wanted a 15% pay increase and 10% more contributions to pensions and they actually got an 8% pay increase and 5% contribution that they were actually giving up something. I'd love to see these union guys actually go out and have their own business. Seems to be a common theme with union members. Never ran a business and know nothing about running a business.

  • @pushvedula5640
    @pushvedula5640 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Wow and back in January after Fastenal let me go because of some budget cuts they had to make at their branch near me, I can’t believe that exactly two weeks later I actually had an interview at YRC but didn’t have enough experience for the job they offered!

  • @robertotto5811
    @robertotto5811 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I was there for 39 years. This is an accurate portrayal of Yellow's collapse. The only thing I would disagree with here is, how things went down with the Teamsters. Yellow wanted to reopen the existing contract with the teamsters while they were in the middle of contract negotiations with UPS. Initially they wanted more concessions. As Murphy said the concession stand was closed. At the last minute they agreed to match the contract that ABF signed with the teamsters. But we all knew the money wasn't there. And the banks caught on. You can't run a business on credit forever.

  • @Boss619Tycoon
    @Boss619Tycoon 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    They burned the company down. They had to run a low profit margin to keep their labor costs low. Not a way to run a business

  • @blogintonblakley2708
    @blogintonblakley2708 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    You take a big risk anytime you go to work for someone else. This is just another example of that.

  • @MrTruker1
    @MrTruker1 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Roadway ( in California) had junk trucks and trailers. 30 years ago I turned down yellow. They was a terrible company to work for. I glad I never went. You also forgot to mention that the management gave themselves FAT BONUSES. Lol

  • @wainber1
    @wainber1 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When I think of the Yellow company, I think of, taking inspiration from the 1960s song “Mellow Yellow,” the end of Yellow being anything but mellow.

  • @arthursmith9264
    @arthursmith9264 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This article should be on Sirius Road Dog,Landline Now & Freightwaves so the true Trucking can see & this time should be showing they need to dump union too try operations because of small bankruptcy issues they live on gov funds & acquisition

  • @donovanjones4175
    @donovanjones4175 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    The new paradigm in trucking has been to make the driver an owner/operator. Thereby putting the debt on the driver, the cost of fuel,maintenance and the truck itself will put you in debt for years. My guess is smaller trucking companies will buy up the assets, and offer the trucks for any one wanting to be an o/o. If they don’t hustle or pay up, take the truck back and find another guy.

    • @GhostRider-sc9vu
      @GhostRider-sc9vu 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You know about Slow Wagons in Fast Traffic I see.

    • @RJ-or8bw
      @RJ-or8bw 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You mean lease operator right?

    • @ZboeC5
      @ZboeC5 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Don't confuse fleece/purchase with an actual O/O. The problem is a lot of younger guys don't know the difference until it's too late.

    • @TenPinTrucker
      @TenPinTrucker 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Predatory fleece purchase should be illegal, but our government encourages it because corporations matter more than the individual. OTR trucking is so bass ackwards right now it's ridiculous, and the government wonders why they can't recruit drivers anymore.

    • @Comm0ut
      @Comm0ut 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You nailed it. I see it's not your first rodeo! That business model relies on new drivers being tricked because they don't "own" anything until it's paid of, they assume ALL the maintenance, towing and repair risk, and if they're injured etc and can't drive they lose it all. When it doesn't pay a big business to own the hardware an individual is even more at risk.

  • @jensumayer
    @jensumayer 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    They are acknowledging the $700 million bailout loan, but only casually mention that the company only exists because taxpayers fully fund the interstate system - another huge subsidy to the trucking industry. I hear there is a driver shortage, so most drivers should be able to find a new job quickly, but probably not on union terms.

    • @bngr_bngr
      @bngr_bngr 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yeah that union squeezed until the company went broke.

    • @02nupe
      @02nupe 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@bngr_bngr mgmt squeezed the company and we see the result.

    • @solosix3991
      @solosix3991 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      ​@@bngr_bngrhow do those boots taste?

    • @stevec8861
      @stevec8861 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Nonsense. Roads are not subsidized (fuels are taxed to fund roads and semi trucks pay additional road taxes above that) and there is no driver shortage. The industry has a glut of capacity. At moment only electric vehicles get free roads, and that won't last long. As electrics gain market share, there will have to be road taxes place on that electricity.

    • @jensumayer
      @jensumayer 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@stevec8861 Nonsense. Motor fuel taxes bring in $90 billion per year and the US spends $416 billion per year maintaining roads.

  • @charlie04291
    @charlie04291 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There’s an copy edit mistake at @ 1:43.
    The VO says “In 2022, Yellow had more than 12,000 trucks…” but the on-screen super says “>12,000 long-haul trucks in 2002.”

    • @RideOutside
      @RideOutside 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That’s called a “greater than” sign, and they used it correctly.

    • @charlie04291
      @charlie04291 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@RideOutsideYou’re right, but that’s not the error. Is the stat from 2002 or 2022? It’s inconsistent between VO & on-screen super.

  • @brmolnar
    @brmolnar 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Clearly the reason was their false advertising. The logo was Orange, but they insisted on labeling it as Yellow.

  • @MagicCyclops
    @MagicCyclops 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Makes sense the company called themselves yellow and had an orange logo what did you think was gonna happen they couldn't even get that right!

    • @knucklehead7456
      @knucklehead7456 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It worked for 99 years.

  • @TheSouthernMensch
    @TheSouthernMensch 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    700 Million?! Where’d the money go? Top executives?

    • @tallflguy
      @tallflguy 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Yes

    • @mr.stonerUDX714
      @mr.stonerUDX714 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      WENT TO THE UNIONS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • @paradiseexpress3639
      @paradiseexpress3639 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mr.stonerUDX714 went to the workers? That's awesome

    • @Vizzi12
      @Vizzi12 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@paradiseexpress3639 and the union 😂 it’s a cult you are forced to pay into

    • @davediamond7228
      @davediamond7228 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      i know someone that works at one of their transfer hubs ,loading/ unloading trucks...and it was that loan that kept him working during the pandemic ....

  • @michaelgoodwin1351
    @michaelgoodwin1351 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Worked for Reddaway as a line haul driver from 2017 - 21. Great company to work for until the parent company YRC/Yellow starting getting more involved. Didn’t make sense that they would change how we ran freight, being that Reddaway along with Holland and New Penn actually made money. Next thing you know we were rebranded as Yellow and now the company is defunct. Good times though..

  • @jguillermoii
    @jguillermoii 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    There's no problem. An increasing trend involves companies recruiting independent truck drivers for their fleets, cutting costs by avoiding benefit expenses. These contractors are more affordable than opting for Big Freight Transport. I believe more freight companies might face closures due to this ongoing shift.

  • @Casey-summer
    @Casey-summer 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Great video, but one thing truckers fail to do is planning for retirement. I was a trucker and really didn't know much on growing my earnings then i was working. People grappling with the difficulty of meeting essential expenses often encounter this situation due to inadequate savings during their working years. The decisions taken in readiness for retirement carry extensive consequences, as demonstrated within my own family dynamics. Differing investment approaches yielded disparate results. Guided by a financial advisor, I'm currently retired and still earn monthly from my investments.

    • @sloanmarriott5
      @sloanmarriott5 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Indeed, that's accurate. I'm currently in my mid-50s. My husband and I were on a similar path until a couple of years ago when I decided to shift my investments to her wealth manager. While I haven't quite caught up to her accumulated profits over the years, I'm at least earning more now. I'm generating income even before retirement, and my retirement fund has experienced remarkable growth compared to what it would have with just the 401(k). It's quite amusing.

    • @mellon-wrigley3
      @mellon-wrigley3 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's regrettable that many individuals lack access to such insights. I understand why people might become anxious. Insufficient information can indeed pose significant challenges. Personally, I've been able to generate over $31k passively simply by investing through an advisor, and the best part is, I don't need to exert much effort. Regardless of economic fluctuations, skilled wealth managers consistently deliver returns.

  • @peterpalmer9757
    @peterpalmer9757 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    What a horrible business model. 5 billion in revenue 20 million net income this ain’t Amazon where they can justify not making profit for all those years

  • @Marcara081
    @Marcara081 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Rail has always been cheaper but government regs protect the trucking industry by forcing rail to become more expensive.

  • @paulkelly4731
    @paulkelly4731 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What went wrong! Management agreed to a Contract with wage, benefit, and work rules that made in uncompetitive in the industry. Management wanted to avoid a strike and placate the Union to it's own demise. If you are the only Union Carrier in a non-union wage environment, it will not end well for you... Management just couldn't say NO... and now they're gone.

  • @ajbudda1038
    @ajbudda1038 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    My supplier, Dover Corporation (fortune 100 company) used Yellow Freight exclusively to ship to Canada because they were the cheapest. Yellow repeatedly damaged goods in transit, damaged goods costing tens of thousands of dollars. Damaged goods on arrival were so common that I started refusing complete deliveries. Yellow Freight deserved to go bankrupt

  • @william7286
    @william7286 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    Why bailouts aren't in the form of stakeholder control is beyond me. All companies that have received bailouts could have been majority owned and operated by the federal government - so much revenue potential was lost. Plus, think of how better off workers would be under a private-public partnership. Sad.

    • @uromvictor
      @uromvictor 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Does the federal government know how to manage anything

    • @william7286
      @william7286 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@uromvictor Without proper funding and leadership, probably not. We get the government we deserve.

    • @SgtJoeSmith
      @SgtJoeSmith 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@uromvictor no

    • @SgtJoeSmith
      @SgtJoeSmith 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      the gov wouldve cut pay in half or else tripled prices. the gov cant even run the usps.

    • @william7286
      @william7286 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@SgtJoeSmith Pretty sure that the workers would have been better off. You must be referring to the executive leadership team.
      The USPS' budget woes can be largely attributed 2006 law requiring it to prepay retiree health benefits 75 years in advance, a provision to which no other government agency or private corporation is subject.
      If I were UPS, FedEx, etc. - this would be the type of policy I would lobby so as to remove a public option to logistics.

  • @Redmenace96
    @Redmenace96 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I am really puzzled by the trucking business. All the news says, "backlog, high demand, freight sitting in warehouses!" . But Yellow goes bankrupt, and truckers are paid like slaves. Shouldn't demand drive up wages, and profits? Isn't there enough competition to drive innovation?

  • @1970sRacing
    @1970sRacing 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    you undercut load prices you wreak your margins, once you add Union cost increases you have no profit (diesel prices, insurance, inflation played a huge part as well)

  • @tysone1254
    @tysone1254 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Ceo made over 2 million dollars last year so they just not have been struggling too bad

    • @davecramer9725
      @davecramer9725 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      More than he should have been paid

    • @peppapigthekiller7539
      @peppapigthekiller7539 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      That’s it? I’ve heard of CEO’s with smaller companies making more.

    • @FreeHat
      @FreeHat 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Underpaid for the position. Look up what other ceos at similar sized companies are making.

    • @tysone1254
      @tysone1254 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah because they run a successful business. All Im saying is its clear that the ceo cared more about himself getting paid than the business living.@@FreeHat

  • @kcgunesq
    @kcgunesq 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    Wow. The Teamsters sure showed Yellow. Of course, the senior leadership team will walk away with millions. But somehow, Teamsters will see this as a victory.

    • @winstonchurchill3597
      @winstonchurchill3597 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Teamsters didn't ruin this company - management did.

    • @motorguy4203
      @motorguy4203 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@winstonchurchill3597they chose to not negotiate for 9 months. They fought so hard for a penny that they lost their jobs lol

    • @murraymadness4674
      @murraymadness4674 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Did you watch the video? They took paycuts for years only to be cired in the end. Get it?

    • @bertgrau3934
      @bertgrau3934 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@murraymadness4674
      The company wanted to I crease the pay, the union refused. Whose fault is that?

    • @kcgunesq
      @kcgunesq 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@murraymadness4674 My take was that Yellow tried to tell them that they couldn't afford to pay them what they wanted. The union stood firm. So instead of having some pay, along with all the other benefits of continued employment, the drivers now make nothing. Where I am from, something is better than nothing.
      Now, sure, if the market is robust enough, those drivers were right to not accept lower wages as they will obviously just walk across the street and get an equal or better job. But if those across the street jobs don't exist, it suggests to me that Yellow was paying at least market, and possibly above market.
      So, sure, management likely made some bad choices. But Sr. management will make millions either way and the average worker is now out of a job that they probably can't replace. So, tell me again, why was the union strategy a winning one?

  • @william53
    @william53 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you

  • @dbarnes544
    @dbarnes544 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Years ago when I drove big trucks most of the companies operated on 90% to over 100% operation cost. Competition, fuel, equipment, taxes. And in the end, management mistakes kill companies

  • @user-ob5rg6ne6l
    @user-ob5rg6ne6l 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    WSJ reports are the best ❤

  • @timetraveler9218
    @timetraveler9218 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Those executives should be forced to pay every cent back out of their own pockets

    • @gund89123
      @gund89123 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Capitalism:
      Profits are private
      Losses are public

  • @superman60201
    @superman60201 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So you know there is another channel that is far superior in analyzing the drops and rises in companies.

  • @gbodyguy5298
    @gbodyguy5298 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Im a mechanic at yellow an all employees we worked 2 weeks in the whole and yellow has not paid us when the closed but the supervisors are still working and will probably receive a severance package the company owes us 2 weeks pay that was worked

  • @gregparrott
    @gregparrott 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    That's a shame. I have ordered extra large and heavy items (such as a V-8 engine, a crane, etc) and to my knowledge, Yellow was the only provider of LTL services for end consumers like myself. Who exists to replace them?

    • @roberthall696
      @roberthall696 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Daily and Many other will haul this freight.

    • @Kyle-gb9dq
      @Kyle-gb9dq 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Saia

    • @gregparrott
      @gregparrott 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Kyle-gb9dq Thanks for the reply. That is a new name to me.

    • @gregparrott
      @gregparrott 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @tyler530chico Thanks. I don't remember seeing either company in northern Nevada. Perhaps one of these companies will take over Yellow's facilities

    • @jayschafer1760
      @jayschafer1760 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      SAIA, Old Dominion, FedEx Freight LTL, ABF. Someone will deliver to you, just might have to make a few more calls and pay more (sometimes a LOT more) now that Yellow is gone.

  • @dougjohnson4266
    @dougjohnson4266 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Did the idiot CEO's and boards that inked these stupid acquisitions have to fork over any pay/bonuses? NAHHHHH! Just screw over employees as normal! Maybe sue the CEO's with the 'Got to grow or die' mentally for wrecking the company?

    • @woofbark4475
      @woofbark4475 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Totally agree... growth is not always a necessity! Being able to comfortably maintain your service and quality is often far more important.

    • @Vizzi12
      @Vizzi12 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The acquisitions happened years ago, the current set of management was actively cleaning up the mess left behind from those horrible decisions

    • @FreeHat
      @FreeHat 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Current CEO isn't the CEO that bought all those companies. The CEO that purchased all of those companies is now on the governing board of USPS.

  • @toddlavigne6441
    @toddlavigne6441 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I read about another trucking company in the USA filing for bankruptcy. They could make payments on their 1 billion dollar debt. That sounds like too much debt
    meeting a slowing/changing economy. IMO I feel bad for all the employees

  • @fern8580
    @fern8580 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    First rule, a member of the military + a union member = bankruptcy
    Second rule, given the huge taxes taken by the different levels of Government, companies are forced to abandon the "cheap" to go to "the expensive"
    Best regards from Harvard !

  • @lapidaryland
    @lapidaryland 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    It was a monopoly in the Kansas area.

    • @rajbanwait325
      @rajbanwait325 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Is

    • @drinkingpoolwater
      @drinkingpoolwater 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      rest east now fella, they are no longer a monopoly

    • @SorminaESar
      @SorminaESar 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It isn't cause monopoly is banned by the Act of Anti Monopoly, USA have adopted and ratification it

    • @lapidaryland
      @lapidaryland 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@SorminaESar Look I'm from Baxter?

  • @bnato8209
    @bnato8209 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Why is the stock jumping to $5 from $0.65 after the bankruptcy?? What is going on??

    • @baileylarsen9517
      @baileylarsen9517 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      From what I’ve heard it has something to do with selling off the assets of the company. Once the debt is paid back, the equity holders have next claim to the assets.

    • @bnato8209
      @bnato8209 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@baileylarsen9517 1.6Billion in obligations that need to be paid first. That is a big stock holder risk from looking at the assets on the balance sheet.

  • @leea3531
    @leea3531 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Where can I find there semi truck and trailers !!!!!!?????????

  • @aaronbritt2025
    @aaronbritt2025 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    @3:35... Union concessions don't work unless the workers see the executives also taking pay cuts. When you ask your workers to sacrifice, it creates morale issues in the workplace that dramatically affects productivity. A worker that loves their job produces far more than one who begrudgingly goes to work every morning and only does the bare minimum. Asking workers to take pay cuts or not get raises is often a corporations first choice to save money. It's usually a bad idea... Unless the workers see the executives also taking pay cuts. They they feel "we're all in this together". Yellow could have saved itself by rebranding Roadway and USF trucks as Yellow and laying off the redundant executives. How many millions could've been saved by just eliminating redundant executives?

  • @user-ct5cg7dz5m
    @user-ct5cg7dz5m 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    The CEO and Controller should be arrested and jailed for malfeasance. Criminal.. RIP to all the honest hardworking truckers who lost their pensions.

    • @wardogies
      @wardogies 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      That will never happen

  • @rawrfjenkins
    @rawrfjenkins 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    "while union leaders come and go yellow has been around a century" comparing humans to a business while at the same time "the debt load, former failures to integrate and prior union concessions for which the company is criticized were the results of actions taken long before the CURRENT BOARD OR MANAGEMENT was in place."

    • @Shane-en2sq
      @Shane-en2sq 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      CEO Darren Hawkins is a thirty year management employee

    • @brtecson
      @brtecson 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I noticed that too.. complete hypocrites they are. making money in the freight business in 2020-2021 was like rolling a ball downhill. Yellow still couldn't do it.

    • @brtecson
      @brtecson 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I agree with *one* part of that statement they made though, the 'debt load' they've acquired from former CEO Bill Zollars were terrible. I think us taxpayers should seize his boat and his lake house, seriously

    • @gund89123
      @gund89123 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      CEOs come and go, Yellow has been here for decades 😂

    • @gund89123
      @gund89123 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@brtecsonstock price went up, CEO made money, bye, bye.

  • @russellkanning
    @russellkanning 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    what a surprise that a union place went out of business

  • @Lizzbird_
    @Lizzbird_ 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    They should’ve made their logo yellow instead of orange

  • @ctrl-shift-run8681
    @ctrl-shift-run8681 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    If you want another interesting story, look at the recent bankruptcy of America's biggest ATM maker.