They are probably clearing stock to release similar bodies with support for Nikon Z lenses. It's great that they are on sale, but I don't have much hope that they will maintain the RF mount in the future.
@@frankbregulla564 Rigging solves all your problems there which is something you definitely want to do with a box style camera. Why deal with shitty internal NDs which all color shifts even in the most expensive of cameras when you can buy one good set and you'll be set for life no matter which camera you use it on.
@@annekedebruyn7797 @annekedebruyn7797 Internal ND´s from Arri or Sony Venice are better than the filters you can buy that take forever to change. All serious cine cameras ( except RED) have them built in since 2014. + in my opinion there is no reason to make a camera way below 3kg and then put on weight to make it move without micro-jitter. I for myself need at least 6-7kg to get nice movements. seen a lot of micro jittery, shaky footage from the komodos here on youtube. they praise it as lightweight setup but why? you see the weight of the camera in the movement, looks often cheap. my 5 cents. what i like is global shutter of the REDs but lots of cameras now around 7ms which is fine for most jobs. maybe good for Gimbal work as well..
@@frankbregulla564 I thought the C80 has a triple ISO sensor like the C400? Along with being full-frame, it should have more dynamic range than the C70.
Love your reviews team! Was wondering if you would share your colour workflow for the Komodo-X? You have nailed a great balance of detail and neutral tones and separation, which I don’t see a lot of on that camera. 🙏
My main two concerns (which you unfortunately haven’t mentioned in this video) is the long boot up time and missing internal NDs. To me these two issues are still a dealbreaker. Since you said you use the KX in the studio, how do those two things affect you? Thanks for your videos!
Price is cheaper, you can buy a breakthrough adapter with solid qulity (RF flange distance is very short) and depending on your work, the bootup time isn't an issue. It's not like you're using Sony NP batteries, that camera can stay powered for hours. If you want better ND filtration, matte box. You want constant power in a studio setting, power cord! If bootup times are an issue, get an FX6 but the downside is that footage will not hold up like R3D in-post; especially if you're filming inside, outside and in multiple color temps with varying shifts. RAW can bring those things back way easier. Different tools for different jobs, any camera now a days is great though what I'm trying to say.
@@buddyfx7026 if you ever used internal ND it’s very hard to go back! 😅 the extra price would not be a problem, but extra gadgets on the camera is not clean enough for me. All I want is a Komodo x with internal NDs and quick boot up time or C80 with global shutter and 6k 60fps. Can’t be that hard to make this. 🙏🏻
Yo, the memory card section alone caught me Red Handed. I didn't know the OG Komodo memory cost that much. X looks like less of a headache but you do have to save 2k+ more to get it. X seems worth it for sure.
Buy a C80 instead - Red does not include batteries at the base price for 5K (just the body). If you have $8K to rig out a Red, at that point the Canon C400 is better choice (way more features then Red).
Only if they bought it for the wrong reasons. If they're out there actually making money with it, they won't give half a shit. It's only children that think like that.
I'm theoretically in the market for a new camera in this exact price range. The weird thing is; i somehow don't trust RED for some reason. I don't even know where this feeling comes from. But i can't bring myself to buy one. Still hoping for a new FX6 or even FX9 tbh.. probably won't happen soon though. Thanks for the great video as always @cvp 🖤
@@frankbregulla564 Technically you can get whatever you want out of any modern camera but Canon is the last thing I think of when I think of a cinema camera shortlist
We just purchased a Raptor X and it’s fantastic. I don’t really care about RF mount/Nikon mount/blahblah. There are PL & EF adapters and no shortage of lensing to deliver the job. These cameras are TINY with mighty specs. If I was spending my own money I may have considered a KomodoX, but honestly, there’s NOTHING to gripe about at these prices. If anyone feels there are shortcomings to capturing amazing footage for clients with these cameras, I’d suggest looking inward at personal skills first.
What a time to be alive and a film maker. Cine cameras now being someone affordable and normal profesional hybrid cameras starting to be a excellent choice too with minimal inconvenience
Hmmm, I'm thinking about getting the Blackmagic Pyxis. It seems to be nowhere near as good as these Komodos but still cheaper and good enough for me as my first box camera ☺️
@@InfamousStar1 let’s agree to disagree as I’ve spoken to producers that work with major brands and that not what they say - at least in the UK anyway.
Jake just made my OG Komodo feel very very outdated compared to the X 😪 there are some things the OG is better In my opinion, like dual swapping batteries on the fly and a more compact body, I’m really looking to get the X since I’ve used it and I feel it’s like the almost perfect version of the OG but I feel I won’t sell my OG, it’s too good, anyways, awesome video guys !
@@IvoPavlik agreed it a question of time just like raw format on nikon too its coming...... would be nice for nikon to make an ftz adapter with an af motor ...
@@Krmelj well tbh there are different angles, red has the technology to make sensors but lacks the capacity to make nice cinema lens if they open to the the z mount you can be assured that nikon will start to remake cinema lenses. yes remake because they used to make them in the old days. but for me there is a little more till now nikons has a hard time to get in the video world, there is a lack of third party ( apart from small rig) cine rigs or even cine lenses. i m sure if red started maybe making applying there philosophy and make ecosystems for nikon mirrorless things would change and tbh more competition can only be good for the industry !! This also would include for me for uw nikon or monster making an adapter with af motor that would accept older lenses would mean i could use my old nikon rs lenses which are the optical best till now.. So voila here are my 2 cents.
This price drop is so tantalizing... I am weighing whether to sell my Komodo and get the X, or to wait and see what Nikon/RED have in-store with their new partnership. What do you guys think? What do you think are the chances we'll get a future Komodo with Nikon-level autofocus built-in?
@@CVPTV Hi Jake, someone posted a comment on Crimson Engine's latest video, "C400 masterclass", that you stopped using the C70 for talking heads and went back to the C200. I found this statement confusing because you said you switched from the C200 to the R5C. I just wanted to stop the rumor since it sounded untrue.
@@CringePanda Hey, we use the R5 C for my headshot setup and then the RED KOMODO for basically everything else unless we are testing a specific camera or lens that requires another camera. Jake
Genuine question, do you think after the price cut that the Komodo X has any significant firmware updates coming its way? Or will they move on to the next camera?
I think Nikon/Red would do well if they came out with a box style camera that is in between the price of the fx6 and BM Pyxis. The Pyxis seems nice but it doesn’t quite nail the specs that I would want. If it could at least do 50/60 fps at the full 6k resolution and offered at least ProRes log and not just BRAW I would have jumped right onto it
My impression is Blackmagic simply isn’t trusted to survive in the field. Resolve is great, as are the converter boxes, etc., but the cameras seem to have a “film school” stigma - charming and novel, but pushed aside when the job matters. In Chicago, I’ve never seen them on-set. I’ve even seen a Kinefinity on a job (odd), but never a BM camera.
@@Yupthereitism Because they do video AND photo work LOL :P and would love to have two video angles for interviews. That was kind of easy to get 🤣 But also because the sensors in those two cameras on paper would look and work well together. But I guess you would know that desire for having both if you knew anything about actual client work. Or maybe if you are a hollywood and netflix only producer you dont need to have a photo camera :P lol. C400 (26 MP 6K BSI sensor with 16 stops of DR and with clog 2) R1 (24 MP 6K BSI sensor with 16 stops of DR and with clog 2) Its the first time Canon has made a camera that matches from the cinema line and the flagship photo line in both the MP count, sensor type and with c-log 2
@@baekmedier first off, you can use any mirrorless camera as a b cam and any cinema camera as an a cam. Any professional know you can match any two cameras with each other in post, especially from the same brand. Point is you could match a canon c70 with a canon r3 very easily. Lastly, the canons do not really have 16 stops of dynamic range. The canons c70 has more dynamic range than both of these camera 😂😅. So my point is, why would you buy the c400 and r1 instead of better cameras for the job. The canons r1 is a sports photography camera, it would just be so incredibly stupid to buy it as a b cam 😅😂😂🤣. Or maybe you aren’t the sharpest tool in the shed ✌️🤣😂😅
@@Yupthereitism I do different jobs for different clients. Including ports... Thats why ;) And I own two C70, the R5C and an R3 my self.. so I can tell you that theres big differences in the image from those cameras.. The R5C is much more sharp and detailed than the C70 image and thats actually an issue if you try to match them for a interview. Second to that the R5C and R3 only shoots C-log 3 and does not match up to the colorspace from the C70 if you shoot the color space that that camera was made for.. C-log 2. Doesent sound like you have worked a lot with those cameras if you say that. but anyways I could be wrong. For me it works great having two C70 as A and B cam and the image looks almost the same with minimal changes in post (lenses does have slight tint to them if you dont shoot cinema lenses that is made in a set because of different coatings) The big "but" and the reason for my question is that is that the two other cameras (R5C and R3) is only used for photo as of now because they dont "fit in" for video. The perfect setup for someone that needs to be able to shoot photos for sports, portraits, events and products and still needs two angles for interviews but want the sensors to be almost the same sharpness and colors the only option right now is the C400 (or the C80) and the R1. Thats just facts. I know that anything can be matched in post even footage from different camera brands different colorspaces and lenses, but it takes time to do it well. having it matching up right out of camera makes a big difference. Switching it up to have two cameras that can do the job instead of having to log around 4 cameras would be a big deal.. and the C400 and R1 would do that for me.
@@baekmedier honestly it sounds like more of a skill issues and less of a hardware issue. By now you should already have profiles for the cameras to match each other and you can literally just shoot everything in clog 3. I’ve used just about every camera on the market and have never had the issues you seem to be having. Spending any amount of money to fix non existent issues seems pretty crazy to me. It sounds like poor justification to waste money and time imo
You are correct, It was Canon C80 and C400 that caused the price drop. I will still buy the C80 over the Red - The Canon C80 is ready to go out of the box - Red has expensive accessories, no batteries, no ND, and you are forced to rig it out (price will jump close to C400 territory) -- at the point C400 feel more tempting 😅
@@quadvr yupp! I’m going from the FX9 to the C400. You can’t beat it considering what you get in that small size and price point. It really makes RED look like overpriced cameras that has lived of its brand. Just look at the price of the RED mini-mags and cables, costs as much as a C80 if you want to make it through one full day of shooting.
@@sa.t.2507 I am planing to upgrade my C100 Mark II to C80 or C400. I am still going to keep the C100 Mark II - very good camera even today (128 GB and battery can last all day on the C100 Mark II). I am going pick up the RF 50 1.2 next year (saving up still), and then Save for C80 or C400.
The footage from these cameras is crap. Just looks digital and not "filmic". We need to stop promoting them as "filmic". Documentary, corporate and weddings great. Tbh most cameras look bad apart from arri 😅
The image depends on your lensing, aptitude, and experience. There is no “digital looking” sensor. Not to be rude, but these comments are simply not thought through.
I think the Komodo X looks a bit clinical; the komodo shots on the other hand have a softer feel to them. In this test footage at least, maybe there was something going on in post. But if it's the OLPF or camera in general, the original will be easier to create a film look with. There are many great examples of that online.
@@prismcollectionmusici still like the OG for narrartive. KIMI 2022 was shot on Komodo by S Soderburg. Looks great! Paired the Komodo was Leitz primes. Ultra sharp! And it still looks great.
Nah, big films shot on red (like the hobbit, matrix resurrections) look just cheap. And the list continues. I searched for films shot on red and apart from "Gone Girl" I could not find a single film that stood out. It's just a cult fad with RED, yes it has a lot of good stuff as digital cameras go, but it's not what people think it is. And the more people buy into it the more they damage their creativity.
Nikon, after acquiring RED, doing some favor for filmmakers.
no internal Nd´s, too light for serious handheld work, don´t like
@@frankbregulla564alternatives?
They are probably clearing stock to release similar bodies with support for Nikon Z lenses. It's great that they are on sale, but I don't have much hope that they will maintain the RF mount in the future.
@@frankbregulla564 Rigging solves all your problems there which is something you definitely want to do with a box style camera.
Why deal with shitty internal NDs which all color shifts even in the most expensive of cameras when you can buy one good set and you'll be set for life no matter which camera you use it on.
@@annekedebruyn7797 @annekedebruyn7797 Internal ND´s from Arri or Sony Venice are better than the filters you can buy that take forever to change. All serious cine cameras ( except RED) have them built in since 2014. + in my opinion there is no reason to make a camera way below 3kg and then put on weight to make it move without micro-jitter.
I for myself need at least 6-7kg to get nice movements. seen a lot of micro jittery, shaky footage from the komodos here on youtube. they praise it as lightweight setup but why? you see the weight of the camera in the movement, looks often cheap.
my 5 cents.
what i like is global shutter of the REDs but lots of cameras now around 7ms which is fine for most jobs. maybe good for Gimbal work as well..
The Komodo-X at this new price an INSANE value. I love my OG Komodo, but if I was in the market now, the X is a no-brainer!
Some may think this comparison is pointless, but I would love to see a comparison between the Komodo X and the New C80
@@kadenkelsch4487 that’s also what I want
I needdd
@@JeffHanesworld C70 better quality because of DGO Sensor.
C80 less dynamic, less pleasing pic
@@frankbregulla564 I thought the C80 has a triple ISO sensor like the C400? Along with being full-frame, it should have more dynamic range than the C70.
@@frankbregulla564the c70 image is a noisy mess. Komodo x > c80 > c70
Love your reviews team! Was wondering if you would share your colour workflow for the Komodo-X? You have nailed a great balance of detail and neutral tones and separation, which I don’t see a lot of on that camera. 🙏
KX still smokes the new Canons for cinema application... Where pure image quality and colors matter, there's no competition at this price
I'm absolutely dying waiting for your PYXIS review.
My main two concerns (which you unfortunately haven’t mentioned in this video) is the long boot up time and missing internal NDs. To me these two issues are still a dealbreaker. Since you said you use the KX in the studio, how do those two things affect you? Thanks for your videos!
Price is cheaper, you can buy a breakthrough adapter with solid qulity (RF flange distance is very short) and depending on your work, the bootup time isn't an issue. It's not like you're using Sony NP batteries, that camera can stay powered for hours. If you want better ND filtration, matte box. You want constant power in a studio setting, power cord! If bootup times are an issue, get an FX6 but the downside is that footage will not hold up like R3D in-post; especially if you're filming inside, outside and in multiple color temps with varying shifts. RAW can bring those things back way easier. Different tools for different jobs, any camera now a days is great though what I'm trying to say.
@@buddyfx7026 if you ever used internal ND it’s very hard to go back! 😅 the extra price would not be a problem, but extra gadgets on the camera is not clean enough for me. All I want is a Komodo x with internal NDs and quick boot up time or C80 with global shutter and 6k 60fps. Can’t be that hard to make this. 🙏🏻
Yo, the memory card section alone caught me Red Handed. I didn't know the OG Komodo memory cost that much. X looks like less of a headache but you do have to save 2k+ more to get it.
X seems worth it for sure.
Buy a C80 instead - Red does not include batteries at the base price for 5K (just the body). If you have $8K to rig out a Red, at that point the Canon C400 is better choice (way more features then Red).
Caught RED handed
Get out. Your fired.
@@puertadlm163 You're*
@@jonathanhilliard971 a retar
RIP to everyone, who bought the Komodo one month ago
They made me feel like a loser for having a OG Komodo..damn man..
Only if they bought it for the wrong reasons. If they're out there actually making money with it, they won't give half a shit. It's only children that think like that.
@@robertdouble559smart people think like that.
@dervorname6274 Why?
Your posts are always fantastic
I'm theoretically in the market for a new camera in this exact price range. The weird thing is; i somehow don't trust RED for some reason. I don't even know where this feeling comes from. But i can't bring myself to buy one. Still hoping for a new FX6 or even FX9 tbh.. probably won't happen soon though. Thanks for the great video as always @cvp 🖤
Probably because their track record for reliability is pretty rocky compared to most other camera companies, especially within the same price range.
buy c300 III in same price range. better
@@frankbregulla564 i will never buy a Canon Camera.
@@frankbregulla564 Technically you can get whatever you want out of any modern camera but Canon is the last thing I think of when I think of a cinema camera shortlist
@@David_Schwarz_DOPHey could you elaborate why? I know that Canons tactics can be really scummy
As a RED Gemini shooter, i wait of a person that sell another Gemini for the same price like an Komodo. 😁
DSMC 2 Love ❤
Facts.
Gemini is still an amazing camera.
Gemini is an awesome cam
We just purchased a Raptor X and it’s fantastic. I don’t really care about RF mount/Nikon mount/blahblah. There are PL & EF adapters and no shortage of lensing to deliver the job. These cameras are TINY with mighty specs. If I was spending my own money I may have considered a KomodoX, but honestly, there’s NOTHING to gripe about at these prices. If anyone feels there are shortcomings to capturing amazing footage for clients with these cameras, I’d suggest looking inward at personal skills first.
What a time to be alive and a film maker.
Cine cameras now being someone affordable and normal profesional hybrid cameras starting to be a excellent choice too with minimal inconvenience
Hmmm, I'm thinking about getting the Blackmagic Pyxis. It seems to be nowhere near as good as these Komodos but still cheaper and good enough for me as my first box camera ☺️
Blackmagic color science is way better these days.
Most shooters (small productions/ solo shooters) are ditching Sony and RED for Blackmagic
@@ODHuntemost (legit and professional) shooters are not. Sorry.
Maybe TH-camrs, but they’re not real filmmakers.
@@InfamousStar1 let’s agree to disagree as I’ve spoken to producers that work with major brands and that not what they say - at least in the UK anyway.
@@ODHunteI haven’t seen blackmagic taking over market share. I think they could but I don’t see it
Come on just launch the interchangeable Z mount now.
Jake just made my OG Komodo feel very very outdated compared to the X 😪 there are some things the OG is better In my opinion, like dual swapping batteries on the fly and a more compact body, I’m really looking to get the X since I’ve used it and I feel it’s like the almost perfect version of the OG but I feel I won’t sell my OG, it’s too good, anyways, awesome video guys !
infomative video thanks CVP
bring the z mounts !!!
Yup, I hope the same. Recently switched from Panasonic to Nikon and would love a professional cinema body with a Z mount.
Very likely in production already.
@@IvoPavlik agreed it a question of time just like raw format on nikon too its coming...... would be nice for nikon to make an ftz adapter with an af motor ...
@@Krmelj well tbh there are different angles, red has the technology to make sensors but lacks the capacity to make nice cinema lens if they open to the the z mount you can be assured that nikon will start to remake cinema lenses. yes remake because they used to make them in the old days. but for me there is a little more till now nikons has a hard time to get in the video world, there is a lack of third party ( apart from small rig) cine rigs or even cine lenses. i m sure if red started maybe making applying there philosophy and make ecosystems for nikon mirrorless things would change and tbh more competition can only be good for the industry !! This also would include for me for uw nikon or monster making an adapter with af motor that would accept older lenses would mean i could use my old nikon rs lenses which are the optical best till now.. So voila here are my 2 cents.
ps don't get me wrong pl mount is awesome..
This price drop is so tantalizing... I am weighing whether to sell my Komodo and get the X, or to wait and see what Nikon/RED have in-store with their new partnership. What do you guys think? What do you think are the chances we'll get a future Komodo with Nikon-level autofocus built-in?
Blackmagic Pyxis is shipping and in people’s hands. Doing their best to compete.
I've heard a rumor that you guys went back to the C200 from the C70. Is there any truth to this? Thank you.
What do you mean sorry? Jake
@@CVPTV Hi Jake, someone posted a comment on Crimson Engine's latest video, "C400 masterclass", that you stopped using the C70 for talking heads and went back to the C200. I found this statement confusing because you said you switched from the C200 to the R5C. I just wanted to stop the rumor since it sounded untrue.
@@CringePandathey literally say they use the red Komodo in this video. They haven’t used a canon for awhile
@@CringePanda Hey, we use the R5 C for my headshot setup and then the RED KOMODO for basically everything else unless we are testing a specific camera or lens that requires another camera. Jake
Genuine question, do you think after the price cut that the Komodo X has any significant firmware updates coming its way? Or will they move on to the next camera?
I think Nikon/Red would do well if they came out with a box style camera that is in between the price of the fx6 and BM Pyxis. The Pyxis seems nice but it doesn’t quite nail the specs that I would want. If it could at least do 50/60 fps at the full 6k resolution and offered at least ProRes log and not just BRAW I would have jumped right onto it
My impression is Blackmagic simply isn’t trusted to survive in the field. Resolve is great, as are the converter boxes, etc., but the cameras seem to have a “film school” stigma - charming and novel, but pushed aside when the job matters. In Chicago, I’ve never seen them on-set. I’ve even seen a Kinefinity on a job (odd), but never a BM camera.
Thank you for the information
Would like the Komodo X to have a 3:2 sensor
Would love to see the C400 as an A cam together with the R1 as a B cam both in clog 2 cinegammut, xf-avc, all intra, 10-bit 4:2:2.
Why would anyone do that? lol
@@Yupthereitism Because they do video AND photo work LOL :P and would love to have two video angles for interviews. That was kind of easy to get 🤣
But also because the sensors in those two cameras on paper would look and work well together.
But I guess you would know that desire for having both if you knew anything about actual client work. Or maybe if you are a hollywood and netflix only producer you dont need to have a photo camera :P lol.
C400 (26 MP 6K BSI sensor with 16 stops of DR and with clog 2)
R1 (24 MP 6K BSI sensor with 16 stops of DR and with clog 2)
Its the first time Canon has made a camera that matches from the cinema line and the flagship photo line in both the MP count, sensor type and with c-log 2
@@baekmedier first off, you can use any mirrorless camera as a b cam and any cinema camera as an a cam. Any professional know you can match any two cameras with each other in post, especially from the same brand. Point is you could match a canon c70 with a canon r3 very easily. Lastly, the canons do not really have 16 stops of dynamic range. The canons c70 has more dynamic range than both of these camera 😂😅. So my point is, why would you buy the c400 and r1 instead of better cameras for the job. The canons r1 is a sports photography camera, it would just be so incredibly stupid to buy it as a b cam 😅😂😂🤣. Or maybe you aren’t the sharpest tool in the shed ✌️🤣😂😅
@@Yupthereitism I do different jobs for different clients. Including ports... Thats why ;)
And I own two C70, the R5C and an R3 my self.. so I can tell you that theres big differences in the image from those cameras.. The R5C is much more sharp and detailed than the C70 image and thats actually an issue if you try to match them for a interview.
Second to that the R5C and R3 only shoots C-log 3 and does not match up to the colorspace from the C70 if you shoot the color space that that camera was made for.. C-log 2.
Doesent sound like you have worked a lot with those cameras if you say that. but anyways I could be wrong.
For me it works great having two C70 as A and B cam and the image looks almost the same with minimal changes in post (lenses does have slight tint to them if you dont shoot cinema lenses that is made in a set because of different coatings)
The big "but" and the reason for my question is that is that the two other cameras (R5C and R3) is only used for photo as of now because they dont "fit in" for video. The perfect setup for someone that needs to be able to shoot photos for sports, portraits, events and products and still needs two angles for interviews but want the sensors to be almost the same sharpness and colors the only option right now is the C400 (or the C80) and the R1. Thats just facts.
I know that anything can be matched in post even footage from different camera brands different colorspaces and lenses, but it takes time to do it well.
having it matching up right out of camera makes a big difference.
Switching it up to have two cameras that can do the job instead of having to log around 4 cameras would be a big deal.. and the C400 and R1 would do that for me.
@@baekmedier honestly it sounds like more of a skill issues and less of a hardware issue. By now you should already have profiles for the cameras to match each other and you can literally just shoot everything in clog 3. I’ve used just about every camera on the market and have never had the issues you seem to be having. Spending any amount of money to fix non existent issues seems pretty crazy to me. It sounds like poor justification to waste money and time imo
No built in NDs is rough though.
price drop, get a breakthrough filter.
Get a camera with built in ND
@buddyfx7026 pretty useless if you shoot with rf lenses
but like, or the Pyxus right?
Thank you!!!! Awesome Info!!!!
Nikon is going to drop all these cameras and make their own
I would get Red Dragon 6k , a heluim 8k or raptor used than this no diddy tho lol 😂😂😂
Love those cameras, but try mounting them on a gimbal sometime!
thank you! Jake
You can thank Canon and the C400/C80 for RED lowering the price on their overpriced cameras.
Lol really you can thank Nikon. But the competition of things in the price range also helps
Nah, that's coz nikon now wants market share and also to clear the old shelf
You are correct, It was Canon C80 and C400 that caused the price drop. I will still buy the C80 over the Red - The Canon C80 is ready to go out of the box - Red has expensive accessories, no batteries, no ND, and you are forced to rig it out (price will jump close to C400 territory) -- at the point C400 feel more tempting 😅
@@quadvr yupp! I’m going from the FX9 to the C400. You can’t beat it considering what you get in that small size and price point. It really makes RED look like overpriced cameras that has lived of its brand. Just look at the price of the RED mini-mags and cables, costs as much as a C80 if you want to make it through one full day of shooting.
@@sa.t.2507 I am planing to upgrade my C100 Mark II to C80 or C400. I am still going to keep the C100 Mark II - very good camera even today (128 GB and battery can last all day on the C100 Mark II). I am going pick up the RF 50 1.2 next year (saving up still), and then Save for C80 or C400.
When is the Cine 12K review coming up?
We are working on that at the PYXIS reviews now! Jake
You guys having trouble selling them huh? They are a great camera, I think many are afraid of being left for dead
Who else is waiting for third and forth used Komodo on the market
Now I hope the whole notion of compress raw trademark is gone!
Stilö overpriced compared to hybrid cameras out there
The footage from these cameras is crap. Just looks digital and not "filmic". We need to stop promoting them as "filmic". Documentary, corporate and weddings great. Tbh most cameras look bad apart from arri 😅
The image depends on your lensing, aptitude, and experience. There is no “digital looking” sensor. Not to be rude, but these comments are simply not thought through.
I think the Komodo X looks a bit clinical; the komodo shots on the other hand have a softer feel to them. In this test footage at least, maybe there was something going on in post. But if it's the OLPF or camera in general, the original will be easier to create a film look with. There are many great examples of that online.
@@prismcollectionmusici still like the OG for narrartive. KIMI 2022 was shot on Komodo by S Soderburg. Looks great! Paired the Komodo was Leitz primes. Ultra sharp! And it still looks great.
I bet this guy couldn’t tell an arri from a Kodak in a blind test.
Nah, big films shot on red (like the hobbit, matrix resurrections) look just cheap. And the list continues. I searched for films shot on red and apart from "Gone Girl" I could not find a single film that stood out.
It's just a cult fad with RED, yes it has a lot of good stuff as digital cameras go, but it's not what people think it is. And the more people buy into it the more they damage their creativity.
Taylor Frank White Linda Hall Maria
👍🏾🙏🏾 🏴🇸🇪🇹🇹
there s rumors about new FIRMWARE UPDATE coming soon for both KOMODO AND KOMODO X .. can u guys confirm that.. or double check your sources please