Very interesting game and I wasn’t sure you were going to win that one. Would have been very interesting to see it all play out as you said you were in decent position but not overwhelming. That USA fleet wasn’t used as effectively as it could have been given how big it was but you played well so definitely looking forward to your next video.
BTW I think, whenever you make an amphibious landing theough a sea zone that starts with enemy ships (e.g. G1 Trans-Jordan landing), the calculator labels ths attack as "Implausible" by default, regardless of the actual likelihood of success
@@MekSSR with all the kjf's out there I find it hard to skip Pearl. Having the usa start with the additional navy in sz53 makes every subsequent round a sweat
Very interesting game and I wasn’t sure you were going to win that one. Would have been very interesting to see it all play out as you said you were in decent position but not overwhelming. That USA fleet wasn’t used as effectively as it could have been given how big it was but you played well so definitely looking forward to your next video.
BTW I think, whenever you make an amphibious landing theough a sea zone that starts with enemy ships (e.g. G1 Trans-Jordan landing), the calculator labels ths attack as "Implausible" by default, regardless of the actual likelihood of success
@@HundredDaysMusic I think that's correct, since the landing is predicated on a successful sea battle
Enjoy your videos, in J1 what do you think about going hard into burma, with 2 transport, you can threaten india round 2, you can skip pearl.
@@MekSSR with all the kjf's out there I find it hard to skip Pearl. Having the usa start with the additional navy in sz53 makes every subsequent round a sweat
hmm, fair