Noam Chomsky - Government in the future 1970

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 23 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 46

  • @oudguitar
    @oudguitar 12 ปีที่แล้ว +74

    This lecture had a greater influence on my ideas about politics then any lecture i've ever heard. Chomsky manages to give an extremely compelling, complete, and complex introductory argument for an anarchist position in less then an hour.

    • @lorenzomcnally6629
      @lorenzomcnally6629 ปีที่แล้ว

      Anarchy the exquisite rear orifice critical THEORY rhetoric of all the as holes who ever lived. Culminating in the sickening repetition of evil upon evil upon evil of all human relations according to the suicidal Faustian Dogmas of an intellectual NPC in the 21st Century.

  • @HSR107
    @HSR107 5 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    Vintage Chomsky is always a delight and just as relevant today as it was then.

  • @antimattv
    @antimattv 4 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    Quite possibly my favourite Noam Chomsky lecture.

  • @philflip1963
    @philflip1963 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    More information and profound insights here than you can shake a stick at, (I may need to listen to it again, and again and again)!

  • @iljahfeedoro8033
    @iljahfeedoro8033 9 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    PRICELESS...

  • @Booer
    @Booer 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Books referenced:
    1:45 The Limits of State Action
    by Wilhelm von Humboldt, J. W. Burrow
    45:11 the political economy of the foreign
    31:56 R. Luxenberg quote

  • @walliegrab9746
    @walliegrab9746 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    this is my favourite Chomsky lecture

  • @edwardjones2202
    @edwardjones2202 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    It's astonishing that he developed this amply documented and substantial conception of american political economy at aged 42 having already revolutioinised linguistics.
    I dont even say its true. But simply to have a plausible, integrated and substantial conception of the sweep of US post war policy is quite breath taking. Especially so given that there was no help from mainstream US intellectual culture, for whom this conception is utterly incomprehensible

  • @KevinLynch1717
    @KevinLynch1717 8 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    FULL TEXT libcom.org/library/government-future-noam-chomsky

    • @pauljeun1886
      @pauljeun1886 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I've been working on it for like 4 hrs... wow...

  • @forgerboy
    @forgerboy 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I love the graphic and this IMO one of his better talks definitely up there

  • @zombiehampster1397
    @zombiehampster1397 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great lecture, kudos for the MAH Food art :)

  • @PBCBlount
    @PBCBlount ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is amazing 😮

  • @stevenhines5550
    @stevenhines5550 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This guy is pretty smart

  • @markmacdonald7955
    @markmacdonald7955 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Struggling to find the political cartoon anywhere online. Link, anyone? Trying to discern the text in the background/buildings.

    • @jemandoondame2581
      @jemandoondame2581 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Which Cartoon?

    • @markmacdonald7955
      @markmacdonald7955 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jemandoondame2581 it's the image you see for the video. Also the thumbnail image.

    • @treyshiver4468
      @treyshiver4468 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@markmacdonald7955 I'm not finding the cartoon either, but the text on some of the buildings is discernible here. I can make out "Profit over people," "What Uncle Sam really wants," "Propaganda and the public mind," and "On power and ideology." These are all titles of books by Chomsky. So I'm guessing that pattern holds true for the illegible parts of the background as well.

    • @lt_caravaggio
      @lt_caravaggio 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      "Noam Chomsky" by Jim Mahfood.

    • @markmacdonald7955
      @markmacdonald7955 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@lt_caravaggio Thank you!

  • @tomfreemanorourke1519
    @tomfreemanorourke1519 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    The loss of individualism over the decades since ww2 has driven the global collectives into the weired paradoxical irony of identity crises which will never be resolved until a global tolerance of perpetual differences has been addressed

  • @naldebol
    @naldebol 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I need the full text of this, please.

  • @longgenes2250
    @longgenes2250 9 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Why does Chomsky's voice sound so different than it does today?

    • @longgenes2250
      @longgenes2250 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Great,, do you know where I could find more speeches from him 45 years +ago?

    • @oxpal
      @oxpal 9 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      +Justin The Mix 50 years of aging and 50 years of development of recording devices.

    • @backslang
      @backslang 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      AGE.......

  • @johnstockwellmajorsmedleyb1214
    @johnstockwellmajorsmedleyb1214 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The intelligent manipulation of the human mind.
    Edward L Bernays
    Is it wrong to remove the logic of love from man's conscienceness?
    A love of ones self, life, freedom, or liberty of achievement.
    If Capitalism has so permiated the perfection of society, how then is it required to manipulate the conscience mind that has no need for teachings about wrong and right?

  • @MarcoSilesio
    @MarcoSilesio ปีที่แล้ว

    wow

  • @dreamingforward
    @dreamingforward 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Isn't classical liberalism individualist (vs. state) capitalism?

    • @GolfBaller
      @GolfBaller 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      How can you have capitalism without a legitimate violence-wielding state to enforce it?

    • @jacobcamarillo4946
      @jacobcamarillo4946 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes

    • @jacobcamarillo4946
      @jacobcamarillo4946 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@GolfBaller capitalism I'd as evil as highways; while abuse can happen, it's arguably how many lives it has saved and hope much better traveling via highways instead of open plains. Like a highway, a society allowing liberty is able to go anywhere. Now that's where it's important to determine wise regulations to make sure capitalism doesn't create more harm then good.

    • @jeromyrutter729
      @jeromyrutter729 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Not exactly. John Stuart Mill became a socialist, for example, and John Dewey argued for economic democracy. Thomas Jefferson, the president who influenced the Bostonian Individualist Anarchists, believe in an agrarian society of free and independent artisans and farmers. He was influenced massively by John Locke, whose labor theory of property, today, we would associate with libertarian socialist notion of "occupation and use", precluding absentee property which is necessary for the factory system (industrial capitalism) that Jefferson feared would make people leave their farms and become dependent on others for their subsistence.
      The idea that Classical Liberalism is only capitalist can only be true if you leave out anti-capitalist CL thinkers.

    • @GolfBaller
      @GolfBaller 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @kippered beef lol shut up libertarian

  • @GoldenGateNum9
    @GoldenGateNum9 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Majestic 👏👏, imagine if Christopher Hitchens had two brains 🧠🧠 and you have Prof. Noam Chomsky

  • @whome9396
    @whome9396 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Nobody wants hear this stuff and good luck discussing it with anyone but I have for sum time now sought the information Chomsky claims is readily available to our society as a unbelievable is that is. The records are extensive. And just a side note. U know he discusses the media bias and one day while talking with my brother who broadcast the news from a untamed city. As a news caster I ask him how he knew what he was saying was true. Now this is my brother and a good guy. But he told me out without skipping and beat that it's true because he's saying it. Funny huh

  • @thedandelionranger
    @thedandelionranger ปีที่แล้ว

    Real

  • @djFracture
    @djFracture 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    From about 39:00 minutes in he describes perfectly everything wrong with the US and Western governments.

  • @HaydnArlene-i9y
    @HaydnArlene-i9y 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Moore Donna Davis Richard Anderson Frank