Nuclear Weapons Loading Procedures (1976)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 19 มี.ค. 2024
  • As longtime viewers of this channel know, on occasion we have departed from our transportation-safety focus... to cover nuclear weapons.
    This 1976 instructional film, published by the United States Marine Corps, describes the structure of the Nuclear Weapon Loading Team, and the correct procedures for completing their tasks.
  • บันเทิง

ความคิดเห็น • 296

  • @gomergomez1984
    @gomergomez1984 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +149

    It’s surreal watching these once classified nuclear weapons handling videos like a normal TH-cam video.

    • @user-se7es6uc8v
      @user-se7es6uc8v 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

      You're telling me. I was involved in this in the RAF in the eighties and signed the official secrets act four times, which means I can never discuss it in detail and must take this information to the grave. Here I am watching it on TH-cam!

    • @AquaTeenHungerForce_4_Life
      @AquaTeenHungerForce_4_Life 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@user-se7es6uc8v Not so sure this has been declassified as it doesn't have a Declassified bumper anywhere in the video or the description.
      Anyone who's ever had a Security Clearance knows that until it has been declassified, it's still classified.
      I saw one comment that they didn't know this was declassified, but then they went on to comment about drogue chute tourqe.
      I'm playing Devil's Advocate here of course, its a curse.

    • @danmaltby3271
      @danmaltby3271 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      its surreal watching kids that can barely grow a mustache, fresh out of high school handling such serious equipment.

    • @mcleodclan
      @mcleodclan 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      All the juicy bits edited out though.

  • @heeder777
    @heeder777 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +169

    My crew load crew on the F-16 used to complete this load in 30 minutes to include power on ops check of the aircraft, safety wire and sealing of the nuclear consent, impulse carts installed and transferred to the aircrew custody. Then again, we were evaluated every month on our proficiency in load training. Real B-61's used for alert were delivered in impeccable condition, like jewelry. If they weren't, was a huge problem with funny names like bent this, broken that and dull. If you know you know. This video shows the Marines but pretty much the same for USAF fighters. Even 20 years after I retired, I can almost read from memory the steps from the checklist. Cool video.

    • @davidmurphy8190
      @davidmurphy8190 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      All 710 pounds of the Mark 61?

    • @heeder777
      @heeder777 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      B-61. About 700 lbs. later mod 12’s were more because they were designed as penetrators.

    • @spacewolfjr
      @spacewolfjr 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      I'm curious, when the B-61 is/was dropped how does the electrical cable linking the plane and weapon detach? It seems like the weapon is dropped with the cable attached?

    • @heeder777
      @heeder777 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      @@spacewolfjr There is a wire rope attached to the connector that is secured inside the pylon. When the bomb drops, the wire rope pulls in the connector which has movable locking tabs that allow it to easily be disconnected from the bomb receptacle. The other wire rope assembly goes to the parachute extractor which depots the chute as the bomb falls away.

    • @randylahey2242
      @randylahey2242 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Did you stand behind the nuke and act like the nuke was your unit?

  • @JinKee
    @JinKee 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +61

    CAUTION: If the weapon ready/safe switch is in the READY position, set the switch to SAFE and notify proper authorities. And report to the PX for new underpants.

    • @rael5469
      @rael5469 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why ? Isn't the weapon supposed to be "Ready" when loaded onto the aircraft?

    • @JinKee
      @JinKee 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@rael5469 nope. Safe when loading onto the aircraft. The pilot makes it ready in the process of weapon release. Ready means it is ready to detonate.

    • @rael5469
      @rael5469 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@JinKee I see what you are saying. On Air Force bombers they had the "Coded Switch" to arm the weapons. The code to enter was one of the Secrets in the flight crew's "Secrets package." I'm not sure but I would imagine those codes were classified as "Top Secret." They could only be carried by officers carrying side arms. That was a long time ago. I don't know what their procedures are now days.

    • @foxxy46213
      @foxxy46213 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@rael5469that's the boom setting

    • @LinusJohansson-yu7cy
      @LinusJohansson-yu7cy 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, and don't be tempted to press the launch button. At least wait until you're airborne before sending the nuke!

  • @josephd.crilly9118
    @josephd.crilly9118 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +71

    I was a member of the A-4M Nuclear Weapons Loading Team in the mid 1980s. Why they picked me ? I don’t know . I was not an Ordinance guy, but the next thing you know I was in the Personnel Reliability Program . We loaded this weapon and a couple others too. The cannon plug attachment to the pylon could be a pain , putting the lead slug on the brass break away wire on the DCU was tricky , it had to be crimped on ,if you dropped anything in the cockpit and could not be certain you removed all FOD you could cause a lot of work for others. Thankfully it never happened to me . The steps in the video seem to be identical to my memory of it . We had a perimeter around the weapon and aircraft with armed sentries though. Based on the training we got and how we were told we could never ever discuss anything we learned or did I’m surprised this video is available . Thankfully we never had to use these weapons, and thank you for sharing it .

    • @Cybrludite
      @Cybrludite 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Thank you for your service.

    • @leisti
      @leisti 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yet here you are discussing it.....

    • @richwest6282
      @richwest6282 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Where in the world were Marine Corps A-4s gonna drop B-61s? Oh, nevermind, lol

    • @AsbestosMuffins
      @AsbestosMuffins 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      pretty sure this weapon and its aircraft are no longer in service

    • @leisti
      @leisti 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I might have misunderstood what "never ever" means.

  • @chuxtuff
    @chuxtuff 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    I did the same thing in the USAF in 1974 while stationed at Bitburg Germany with F-4E's (the ones with the 20mm nose gun) we loaded with either the B-57's which were white with red trim or the B-61's that were unpainted metallic color. I was a "four man" who readied the weapons and drove the "jammer" for loading while the others readied the aircraft on a four man load crew. Both were 2000 pound classed weapons. In Germany we had about 90 aircraft so we figured maybe 50 weapons or fewer as not all aircraft would be battle ready so they wouldn't be loaded either. These aircraft once loaded were in what they called the Victor Area, while the aircraft on hot alert and loaded with AIM 7 Sparrows and AIM 9 Sidewinder missiles was called the Zulu Area. The nuclear loaded planes NEVER flew once loaded, they were the ones parked behind that 16 foot tall double cyclone fencing with locked gates and guards with dogs were a common sight. Although the hot alert aircraft were scrambled daily sometimes more then once!! That was a great job in the USAF although things were winding down in southeast Asia and there got to be fewer and fewer of us weapons troops around. My enlistment was up in 1976 and even though I enjoyed (most of) my time, I never once regretted my decision either...

  • @privatepilot4064
    @privatepilot4064 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    I used to do this in 1976. It’s amazing how much I remember! We had armed Marine guards around us when loading.

  • @6omega2
    @6omega2 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

    In the USAF we used to call the B-61 the "Dr. Pepper Bomb," because of the selectable yield (referred to an old Dr. Pepper TV commercial saying you should "refresh at 10, 2, and 4").

    • @K3KTB
      @K3KTB 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      We called the B-61 the "dial a blast" on our team in the Navy.

    • @christopherleubner6633
      @christopherleubner6633 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Now I got an image of it going off and doctor pepper spraying everything and everyone❤😂

    • @patrickwalsh2884
      @patrickwalsh2884 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That was the B-57.

    • @thomaswood7495
      @thomaswood7495 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I was a 463 and never recall hearing about the Dr Pepper Bomb. It's interesting how different areas of the world have their own colloquialisms. We called it a Silver Dildo, though.....

  • @marth6271
    @marth6271 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    On the carrier where I was assigned they would cart the B-61’s thru the chow hall when they were taking them from the magazine. One time and place where the sailors let the grunts be. They had their game faces on…

  • @smedleyx
    @smedleyx 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

    I love vintage instructionals

  • @beverlychmelik5504
    @beverlychmelik5504 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    Sat on alert with B-52s many a time with mark 28s and B-61 and occasionally B-53s. A whole lot of instant sunshine in that one.

    • @Republic9323
      @Republic9323 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      "A whole lot of instant sunshine in that one"
      Thats a vast understatement with the B-53. Thankfully today, we no longer have any need for multi-megaton monsters like that anymore.

    • @Furudal
      @Furudal 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Republic9323 the wikipedia page mentiones that parts of those warheads might have been preserved, for possible use for planetary defense applications, shoud a urgent need arise

    • @baltimoraclehdeg4270
      @baltimoraclehdeg4270 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wouldn't be shocked to find that the equivalent in megatonage may still be deployed as an SLBM in Soviet-era Boomers

  • @rael5469
    @rael5469 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    Handling nukes on the flightline became somewhat routine, if you could ever call handling nuclear weapons routine. Whether it was uploading a bomber or downloading one when it came off of alert....or loading them up for an Operational Readiness Inspection exercise. On one ORI my supervisor asked me if my aircraft was ready for weapons. I said all we need is the final security check and we were ready. Apparently all he heard me say was "we were ready." Because the final security check of the aircraft means from that point on the aircraft has a red rope put up around it and from then on it's two-man policy inside the red rope and therefore ready for weapons to enter next to the aircraft. Well I had my aircraft log book laying on the fire extinguisher in front of the aircraft doing sign-offs and I get a tap on the shoulder.......it's a nuke weapons package and its heavily armed convoy. I said to the security guard (wait for it) "Are you sure that is for this aircraft?" And all hell broke loose. The entire base went on alert. They considered it a bent spear. Something went wrong with a nuke convoy and Bird Colonels were suddenly on all sides of me. "Airman what do you mean holding up this convoy??? ....and so forth and so on. It was a cluster fluke. I couldn't get a word in edgewise.....and before I could even say anything...they rolled the convoy into my area without it's final security check. I looked at my supervisor and shrugged. He said, "Put up your red ropes airman." The security guards weren't even in position. They were standing behind me when there was supposed to be one in back of the aircraft.
    That's one story anyway. There are others.

    • @heeder777
      @heeder777 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      All I can say is during an ORI or an NSI (even worse) two distinct things happen, you either shine or screw the pooch. Never "You all did OK" 😂

    • @rael5469
      @rael5469 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@heeder777 That's exactly right.....and I never agreed with that method of training. I felt like we should have drilled on doing things the correct way so we would at least know how things SHOULD look......instead of the cluster X we usually engaged in.

    • @christopherleubner6633
      @christopherleubner6633 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Sound like an interesting day on the base 😂

    • @rael5469
      @rael5469 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@christopherleubner6633 Never a dull moment, as they say.

  • @JinKee
    @JinKee 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    0:44 Just noticed that skyhawk is equipped with the Flash Hood to stop the pilot being blinded by his own weapon

    • @jamesterrynewton4794
      @jamesterrynewton4794 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      So it was expected the pilot and aircraft would survive?

    • @30K_ACTUAL
      @30K_ACTUAL 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@jamesterrynewton4794 you just need the pilot to think that

    • @JinKee
      @JinKee 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@30K_ACTUAL if you look up an article by test pilot Lt Col Norvin C. “Bud” Evans (USAF b. 1924 - d.2020) titled “Nuke the Pilot”, part of the test schedule Operation Redwing was to find out how close you could fly airplanes to a megaton class nuclear atmospheric test. Eventually he suffered burns and broken aircraft but he got the data and landed his airplane every time.
      After that the USAF developed a manoeuvre called “the goofy loop”. Since the aircraft releasing the weapon would be much closer than the Bud Norvin’s plane had come to ground zero, they asked the pilots to close the flash hood and do a dive toss to get the weapon lobbed towards the target and then keep pulling back on the stick until inverted and facing away from the target. Once facing away (according to your instruments because you can’t see outside to do pilotage with the hood closed) you rolled upright and did full afterburner out of there.
      Does it work? I don’t know. Maybe they tried it a couple of times before atmospheric nuclear testing got banned.

    • @JinKee
      @JinKee 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jamesterrynewton4794 read the article “nuke the pilot” by Lt Col Bud Norvin.

    • @DonVigaDeFierro
      @DonVigaDeFierro 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​​​​@@jamesterrynewton4794 So, Wikipedia says that the B61 can be launched at speeds of up to Mach 2, which would give the pilot a fair distance before it detonates about 31 seconds later. The B61 is also variable yield, but not exceeding ~400kt (Wikipedia says so). It makes big boom, but not the biggest boom.
      Alas, the Skyhawk is only capable of flying at up to 1,083km/h or around Mach 0.8. That's still about 300m/s if the pilot hauls ass. 31 seconds later that would put a distance of around 9.3 kilometers or 5.8 miles on the horizontal, plus the height at which the A-4 is flying... Yeah, I'd say there's a fair chance of surviving...
      But in nuclear war, the lucky ones are the ones who die immediately.

  • @jimeditorial
    @jimeditorial 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +132

    If the Soviets ever invented a bomb that destroyed clipboards, America would have been defenseless

    • @Ronilac
      @Ronilac 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      But it is, and always will be, beyond the Russian imagination

    • @JohnnyWednesday
      @JohnnyWednesday 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@Ronilac - bigot

    • @allen480
      @allen480 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@JohnnyWednesday Time to feed your bunny rabbits Skippy.

    • @whirledpeas3477
      @whirledpeas3477 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      This is the war room. You guys can't fight here

    • @dusktilldawny666
      @dusktilldawny666 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Don't forget Brilcream...

  • @robertgaudet7407
    @robertgaudet7407 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Hey! It's great to see you post again. My grandfather flew F-100 super sabres for Strategic Air Command. If shit had hit the fan, he would have hit the airfield at Prague. The control tower was apparently real easy to spot. He paused to note it from the bridge he was going to fly over when he visited after the Cold War had ended.

    • @Gitbizy
      @Gitbizy 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Which airport in Prague? There’s a dozen of them…?

    • @robertgaudet7407
      @robertgaudet7407 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Gitbizy Dunno, wasn’t there at the time. He said they were reluctant to ever fully prime the weapon from the ground since it was one of only a few single crew aircraft armed with atomic weapons at the time, which was quite a bit earlier than this. Fifteen years earlier or so.

  • @user-je5do6jn2f
    @user-je5do6jn2f 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Earl Heineman's Hotrod, the A-4 Skyhawk was built with long landing gear legs in order to fit earlier tactical nukes, like the Mk. 7 Thor. The B-61 was a gamechanger because of its small size in comparison.

  • @Monty22001
    @Monty22001 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

    There are details and images, especially of the control panet that i've never seen before. And I've seen pretty much every picture and video that's in the public on the B-61.

    • @bigdevil73
      @bigdevil73 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      glennsmuseum

    • @Monty22001
      @Monty22001 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@bigdevil73 Yes. I saw that since my post too. There is also a TH-cam channel called John Strangelove with a lot of different DAY control panels. Very few views and all comments are off.

  • @bobdun918
    @bobdun918 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    If only some aircraft manufacturers would have similar procedures and verification

    • @ebikecnx7239
      @ebikecnx7239 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Careful you'll be Arkancided

    • @AndrewMerts
      @AndrewMerts 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's the sketchiest part of the whole Boeing debacle IMO. They do have similar procedures and verification. When someone in the Air Force lies on the paperwork they're almost certainly going to get caught depending on what it was and there's actual repercussions for it. When someone at Boeing lies and comes up with some contrived reason why they can skip the paperwork and inspections there's a tiny tiny chance that the CEO might have to make a public statement a few months later claiming to care about safety.

  • @johnned4848
    @johnned4848 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Wow great video. Fascinating and still relevant since the B-61 is still deployed

  • @TheDamnSpot
    @TheDamnSpot 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Unbelievable. It is unreal how you get these. Amazing job man. I'd rather watch this than Mr Beast for sure.

  • @Ray2Jerry
    @Ray2Jerry 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +47

    Now I know why my homemade nuke failed in the 60s... I didn't leave enough slack for the GWC-215 dongle through the service panel. Wish I had TH-cam back then! 😂

    • @davidmurphy8190
      @davidmurphy8190 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The Mark 43 was a really neat design.

    • @Waltham1892
      @Waltham1892 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Coulda, Woulda, Shoulda, Oughta....

    • @jaycee30865
      @jaycee30865 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Please call your local FBI field office. They’re apparently having trouble getting through to you.

    • @JCWren
      @JCWren 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jaycee30865Just ignore his abnormally large collection of smoke detectors, please.

  • @penguin44ca
    @penguin44ca 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    He's back baby

  • @AndrewTubbiolo
    @AndrewTubbiolo 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    How did they never do an episode of Gomer Pyle USMC to this? Could you imagine the fun Pyle and Sgt Carter would have getting this detail?

    • @NachosElectric
      @NachosElectric 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      "Pyle!"
      "Shazam!"
      "Pyle!"
      "Shazam!"
      "Pyle!"
      "Shazam!"

  • @oldjarhead386
    @oldjarhead386 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I was a Marine I went to school to do these LOADEXs on scooters. As an I level avionics tech I started as the red line security force. I was accidentally sent to the Nuke weapons handling school by admin. I got to the school and pointed this out. But was told to go anyway! So I did. Finished first in the AO course. Then after the course I went back to the security force as the SOG. That’s how the Corps rolls!

  • @TheGrimStoic
    @TheGrimStoic 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I swear I heard Vera Lynn singing "We'll meet again" the entire time.

    • @ssmt2
      @ssmt2 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      “Don’t know where, don’t know when”. Dr. Strangelove. That’s a movie that has held up well over the years.

    • @TheGrimStoic
      @TheGrimStoic 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@ssmt2 so glad there are some who still get it

  • @byronharano2391
    @byronharano2391 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Remember this command? "Stop the load!" Lol...VA 145 Swordsmen ADAN then, 1984-86. (AD3 when i rotated to shore duty).

    • @MrDromedary
      @MrDromedary 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      В это время я служил в Советской Армии.

  • @AR-ed3xw
    @AR-ed3xw 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    Wow you're back! Now what about RWP?

    • @videosuperhighway7655
      @videosuperhighway7655 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No need to worry about RWP when the world will end in a big radiation cloud.

  • @ct79
    @ct79 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Nice to see a new vid from you!

  • @gastonbell108
    @gastonbell108 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    We called LABS bombing the "idiot loop" back in the day.

  • @JordanHourGlassDJ
    @JordanHourGlassDJ 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Glad to see your back!! 🍻 🇺🇸 😎

  • @georgeburns7251
    @georgeburns7251 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This procedure was quite a bit different than the one we used on A7 loads on the Ranger in 68 in the Sea of Japan following our deployment in Yankee Station.

  • @Mike-01234
    @Mike-01234 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Had a co-worker back in the 90's he was retired AF pilot from the 70's through early 80's flew F-4s he said they would sit on alert with nuclear weapons attached to the F-4. I once asked him how the process was done he said they went though a checkout procedure for loading the weapon. In the cockpit there was yield selector could select how big wanted nuclear bomb to be. Sometimes they would sit on alert with the engines running ready to take off.

  • @mosshark
    @mosshark หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is fascinating stuff.

  • @tac-cobserver3788
    @tac-cobserver3788 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Awesome 🤙

  • @cicerotullius
    @cicerotullius 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Well been there.....done it....plus QUAST LOAD. Pretty B-61

  • @RV-jq5pb
    @RV-jq5pb 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I unloaded attack ships off the shores of Orion. Had no idea how a kid like me ended up there. Ended up moving to a new place after one of the ships caught fire. New place has beautiful sunbeams at night though.

    • @30K_ACTUAL
      @30K_ACTUAL 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Seen any C-glitter yet?

    • @RV-jq5pb
      @RV-jq5pb 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's hard to see with all the rain we've been getting. really makes me want to cry at my favourite rooftop hideout. i go there to collect my thoughts.@@30K_ACTUAL

  • @tightlines106
    @tightlines106 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I love the old school docs very relaxing

    • @jaycee30865
      @jaycee30865 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They show you that this country was at one time sane. I’m not sure anymore. I am tempted to find comfort like you do but goddamn I’m truly concerned for the way things are now.

  • @baki0608
    @baki0608 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I like how the guy screwing the connection by hand @0:20 gives the thumbs up, I envy his confidence

  • @HailAnts
    @HailAnts 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I absolutely love the choice of words in that first line of dialog: _"... utmost precautions have been taken to assure the _*_reliability_*_ of the weapon."_
    That's *_reliability,_* not safety, not security, but reliability!
    Safety and security are a given, the military and the public want to be sure that the bomb will work if used! They know that millions of (American) lives are at risk if it doesn't.
    Same is still true today, regardless whether people like to admit it or not.. 👍🇺🇸☢️

    • @66PHILB
      @66PHILB 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Reliability also includes the weapon not detonating at the wrong time.

    • @ZXLNT
      @ZXLNT 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Called Always and Never..

  • @widescreennavel
    @widescreennavel 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    The Grounding Cable? That's a 1/4 inch male guitar jack! I am assuming there's a Fender Twin Reverb Amp at the other end of that cable...

    • @aj-2savage896
      @aj-2savage896 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The spacing of the contact areas of the jack is different. So is the diameter. Otherwise . . . .

    • @oceanhome2023
      @oceanhome2023 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I hit the Translation button and I got the entire instructions done by Slim Pickens !!

    • @christopherleubner6633
      @christopherleubner6633 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yup an audio plug. Bet it has some serious distortion when it gets dropped😂

  • @joshfrancis9903
    @joshfrancis9903 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Man I thought you’d disappeared for a second there don’t scare me like that

  • @glennhelm9525
    @glennhelm9525 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Former Army MP here. I did a short stint as security in '76@ a nuclear warhead storage facility s. of Mainz, FRG. Mostly 155 artillery & Lance missle heads. BORING. ED drills. Air demo. drills by F4's 100' up. Their practice mission was to recon the site to see if ED (Emergency Destruct) was complete, if not, then BTSOOI (Bomb The **** Out Of It) Much movement of items via Shithooks/Huey's, always a fun time, there was always a false flag movement that faked the move of phony heads to distract the wonderful guys in the Red Army Faction & Baeder Meinhof terrorist gangs. We had authority over all who entered, all inside the Limited & Exclusion Zones, including an inspecting General who put his security badge on the wrong side, which was a duress signal. They were ordered to prone out, while we sorted the problem. Said General apparently moved the badge after going through Entry Control, mussing his uniform. He took full responsibility. After 10 months of this, I was off to a White Hat (patrol) unit, to get jumped & whacked by drunk engineers( excuse the redundancy) & dealt with serious drug (them, not me) problems. Another story.

    • @fredericklockard3854
      @fredericklockard3854 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I was at an Italian missile base which had some US nukes. We had the same thing - US and Italian jets flying super low over us during drills after an emergency destruct exercise.

  • @NFlight
    @NFlight 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I maintained W70's. Scary beasts. Pu core with Tritium assist. So yeah, a "neutron bomb". (Not classified.)

  • @mutestingray
    @mutestingray 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I like the groovy instrumentals

  • @needleonthevinyl
    @needleonthevinyl หลายเดือนก่อน

    With the F35 and B21 carrying the B61, the grandchildren of the guys in this video are completing more or less these same procedures to this day

  • @spacewolfjr
    @spacewolfjr 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    We received a B-61 that was a little oily/greasy and warm to the touch. It turns out it was a Bolognese-61 and it was filled with Momma Luigi's secret recipe!

  • @BruceGinkel
    @BruceGinkel 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    The real question is how did they load those bombs using only crayons and elmers glue?

    • @suspicionofdeceit
      @suspicionofdeceit 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They are Marines and adapted.

    • @heeder777
      @heeder777 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The Marines eating crayons must be a fairly recent, last 10-15 years thing. I've asked retired Marine friends, and they have no idea what it's about. Can you clue us older guys in?

    • @alphgeek
      @alphgeek 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@heeder777Marines have got smarter over the years, the older ones didn't really "get" crayons. And you wouldn't let them within 200 feet of a pot of Elmer's back in the day.

  • @nicholasmaude6906
    @nicholasmaude6906 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'd love to see the nuclear loading procedures for the Mk-15, Mk-17/24, Mk-21 and Mk-36 thermonuclear bombs. Also for the Mk/B-28 bombs.

  • @AquaTeenHungerForce_4_Life
    @AquaTeenHungerForce_4_Life 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Quick question 😅
    When was this declassified?
    Normally like ya see on Periscope’s video or any other prior classified info, a declassified bumper before the video.
    Just don’t want anyone getting knocks at the door. 😂

    • @AquaTeenHungerForce_4_Life
      @AquaTeenHungerForce_4_Life 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      No answer...
      It's not a good look; there is no telling who is running this channel. Fishing for comments from prior service members seems to be pretty easy on TH-cam. Just because something is from the 50s, 60s, 70s, etc, and is old as dirt does not mean it's declassified, unless it specifically states so. The fact this video has none is worrying.
      Anyone with a security clearance knows this; comments shouldn't be talking about drogue chute torque or what selectors do in a certain position.
      We have an entire generation of people who do not know what life was like before the Internet. I'm sure I'm overreacting by playing Devil's Advocate here, but this is also how information is stolen.

  • @GeorgeJansen
    @GeorgeJansen 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    1:06. Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems to have taken the jet a while to climb, and it looked like it sunk a little before the camera cut away.

    • @Gitbizy
      @Gitbizy 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I was thinking the exact same thing. I know most of those A4s were underpowered but that seemed like an extraordinarily long takeoff roll.

    • @oldjarhead386
      @oldjarhead386 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      None of those was true. It’s not usual for a jet to sag after take off. It’s called “establishing a positive rate of climb”.

  • @HeaanLasai
    @HeaanLasai 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Was the soundtrack added afterwards?

  • @robertowarren7007
    @robertowarren7007 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We still use paper TMs...although there is a slow movement toward tablets

  • @Pismensky
    @Pismensky 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If I was one of those guys I'd bring that big thing home to keep it as a souvenir.

  • @leoniousmumblescraper1311
    @leoniousmumblescraper1311 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Anyone know if this is MCAS Yuma or El Toro? The aircraft is a A4M “Super Mike”, VMA-214, “Black Sheep”. I’m guessing El Toro.

  • @Jagdtyger2A
    @Jagdtyger2A 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nice info. if I had a Vietnam War era nuke handy. Otherwise just more history trivia, which is always fun

  • @raxxtango
    @raxxtango 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    love the zippy muzak.

  • @davidedgar2818
    @davidedgar2818 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Back when I was in the Navy they were using computer punch cards to program the targeting information into the warhead package. This seems like this film is just before that time. Programming missiles to specific targets has been one of the major time consuming in readiness. The newest methods are so quick now that this film seems to be in slow motion.

  • @markm9849
    @markm9849 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Glad to see you're back! Nine months is a long time, were you pregnant? 😂 Hope to see more from you.

  • @rtz549
    @rtz549 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Are those gas generator cartridges used for the weapon ejector cylinder?

    • @prsearls
      @prsearls 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes

  • @SloaneLasers
    @SloaneLasers หลายเดือนก่อน

    The B-61 can be released at speeds up to Mach 2 and altitudes as low as 50 feet.

  • @Dan-yk6sy
    @Dan-yk6sy 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I like how it looks to be a 12 gauge shell (or pair?) that kicks the nuclear bomb off the plane.

  • @Freedom4Ever420
    @Freedom4Ever420 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Does anyone know what the 6 position selector , and 3 position selector do?
    They were set to A and H

    • @musicmanfelipe
      @musicmanfelipe 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Most likely it was "dial a yield" settings. As for the 3 position selector, that was probably for free-fall, toss-bombing, or retarded drop (with a parachute).

  • @madeconomist458
    @madeconomist458 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I'm a civilian so take this for what it's worth, but I can't fathom it would be this orderly in a wartime scenario. The only time tactical nukes would be used is if NATO were up shit creek without a paddle, and Russia would almost certainly strike back, with nukes, at whatever airfield from which the strike aircraft took off so these guys would be doing this with the (virtual) certainty that they would be dead within hours.

    • @user-se7es6uc8v
      @user-se7es6uc8v 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      So I worked on a nuclear QRA in Germany with ready to go aircraft armed with these types of weapon. The aircraft were sat in hardened aircraft shelters ready to launch and the only thing necessary to do with the weapon was to pull out a single pin. The alarm could sound and from that to being airborne was about twenty seconds, maximum thirty. Everything you see in the video is conducted beforehand, perhaps days beforehand. There were always a number of aircraft ready to launch. The scenario in the film has not included this, perhaps to keep the launch sequence classified. I know for a fact that the part where the armourer removes the pin that prevents release is fantasy. If an armourer or the pilot so much as touched that pin on quick reaction alert we were instructed to shoot them dead. There was a sequence of failsafe codes that had to be completed between us and the pilot (took five seconds) and we were then to pull the pin. If the pilot attempted to taxi the aircraft with the weapon on and the codes procedure wasn't complete we were to shoot through the canopy and kill the pilot. So a lot of checks and balances after the work in the video was done. That part was certainly never filmed or discussed and was secret (and still is; I have omitted much). We practiced this over and over and never knew if it was an exercise or the real thing. The sobering part was that if it was real and they got airborne, you had a few minutes before the incoming nukes would land right on top of you.

  • @rael5469
    @rael5469 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    The rank of Sargent was not needed in the Air Force in the 1980s to sign for possession of nuclear weapons on an aircraft. Looking back that seems amazing but.....there it is.

  • @baxtersa1
    @baxtersa1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    First of all: who gave the Marines a nuclear weapon?

  • @cdrom1070
    @cdrom1070 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    i think they should put a foam cutout cover thing thing on the fins incase someone bumps into it

  • @cornknight
    @cornknight 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Oh, now I know how to charge a nuclear bomb! All that remains is to get it, or... buy it. Thanks to TH-cam for the educational videos!

  • @sync0x
    @sync0x 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Just like the Big Mac and its sauce, the ingredients are out in the open for public scrutiny but the ratios are the trade secret.

  • @user-yp9nz6bs9q
    @user-yp9nz6bs9q 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This could be a training film for Otis Elevator Company.

  • @allen_steel1236
    @allen_steel1236 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Has anyone seen the 10 mm socket, also I can't find the three rolls of duct tape listed on the Manifest

  • @curranhouse
    @curranhouse 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The missle knows where it is becuase it knows where it isn't...

  • @General_Confusion
    @General_Confusion 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I assume this isn't the rapid reaction force.

    • @heeder777
      @heeder777 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The only time you would load a live weapon would be for ready alert or an exercise. The aircraft coming off alert doesn’t get download until its replacement is loaded, cocked and locked. Time standard for fighters was an hour to do the load. No rushing allowed.

  • @user-je5do6jn2f
    @user-je5do6jn2f 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Solid state cables and analog detents. Retro.

  • @pw510577w
    @pw510577w 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The fire fighting equipment looks ancient.

  • @av8or4951
    @av8or4951 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    They ALL had crayon particles in their teeth, I seent it!

  • @rmkilc
    @rmkilc 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    CHECK!

  • @warrenholmes3311
    @warrenholmes3311 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Kinda curious? Outside with NO covers? A prohibition?

  • @MitzvosGolem1
    @MitzvosGolem1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Dr Strangelove approved

  • @aj-2savage896
    @aj-2savage896 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    "Hands and feet clear."

  • @raZZkataeV
    @raZZkataeV 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Обязательно бахнем!

  • @kwhp1507
    @kwhp1507 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I wonder if the procedures have been updated to make it more idiotproof.

  • @jimsvideos7201
    @jimsvideos7201 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I didn't realize a Scooter had that much room underneath. Try an F-18.

    • @peterstickney7608
      @peterstickney7608 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      It was originally designed to carry the Mk 7, back in the early '50s. The Mk 7 was a big beast, so the Scooter got its long, spindly legs. If you can find a picture of an A-4 carrying a Mk 7 in flight, it looks like the plane is riding a Zeppelin - it's hard to say who's carrying who.

  • @sierrabravo78
    @sierrabravo78 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is it a 214 Blacksheep Bird ?

  • @oceanhome2023
    @oceanhome2023 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Does “Always and Never !” Ring a Bell ?

  • @desertengineer1
    @desertengineer1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wait, the title says 1976, but the jammer says it’s 1982?

  • @allen_steel1236
    @allen_steel1236 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Did anyone else notice this but me but he says 2, 50 lb bottles of CO2 then the video shows a 50 lb CO2 fire extinguisher, then the second shot is of a 100 lb dry chemical or foam fire extinguisher. It is propelled by either CO2 or nitrogen.

  • @vizibug
    @vizibug 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    by the time they get airborne, we done lost...

  • @herbert92x
    @herbert92x 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    El Toro?

  • @Kaefermicha
    @Kaefermicha 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Now where I know how to do it, where can I get the A4 and the bomb?

    • @Kaefermicha
      @Kaefermicha 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      On a more serious remark, however: Imagine doing this for real - it takes ages and people would be scared as hell. Good it never happened.

    • @randykelso4079
      @randykelso4079 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Have you tried Walmart online?

  • @user-je5do6jn2f
    @user-je5do6jn2f 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Don't forget the white nuke curtains.

  • @user-je5do6jn2f
    @user-je5do6jn2f 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    B-61 free-fall tac-nuke?

  • @johnmorykwas2343
    @johnmorykwas2343 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ah yes! "The Silver Bullet ".

  • @harryjones5260
    @harryjones5260 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    think we'd all be dead by the time they've finished the checklist

  • @user-je5do6jn2f
    @user-je5do6jn2f 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Prepare for the Future: Vault-Tec

  • @user-je5do6jn2f
    @user-je5do6jn2f 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Pneumatic cartridges?

  • @grantroberts2203
    @grantroberts2203 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Looks like a B61?

  • @BruceGinkel
    @BruceGinkel 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    man you wouldn't be able to hear anything on a flightline, let alone while the generator is running at full chooch. Them joints is loud AF.

  • @BradJTownsell
    @BradJTownsell 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Two Man Rule = “ Two Persons qualified in the TASK being PERFORMED.. able to detect an UNAUTHORIZED ACT ..on on part of the other ..SIR !” ., first thing I/ we had to learn to be “ PRP “( Personal Reliability Program ) when assigned to “980th Military Police Company - Sierra Army Depot - Herlong CA ( ten miles..past “ Middle if Nowhere ! Haha) .. circa 1981 ( Mission “ To Guard Items.. Documents and War Reserve Material..Vital to National Security..SIR ) ( “ The Area” is no longer there..ie SALT II Agreement required same to be “ Dismantled “ ) .. it’s just an unknown miracle that the “ Cold War” ..never got/ went “ Hot” ..I / we were 18yrs old US Army MP Private /E1 MOS 95 BR3 ( Military Police - Physical Security) and doing the MOST important task/ Job.. of our lives !

  • @user-je5do6jn2f
    @user-je5do6jn2f 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ancient 6 pin 120VAC cables.

  • @MikeMike-wc8on
    @MikeMike-wc8on 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Are those real officers, or just actors?

  • @loganmeline9233
    @loganmeline9233 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I remember when my 13 year old buddy failed to follow procedures. It resulted in the harmless detonation of a firecracker in his hand. Though he didn't think it harmless at the time.