He has been one of my main career inspirations whenever i looked beyond film's true golden age. Your tribute was very thorough. I have a BFA in Cinematography. This type of light artistry has been completely lost because our age is aural, not visual. We view art now nostalgically. Many thanks from deep inside the gallows of a lost Hollywood. Long live film, which digital has desperately tried to kill off.
Thank you, this was a wonderful exposition of Sven Nykvist's work. As a photographer with a background in Film and eagerness to learn, I highly appreciate your videos.
Sven Nykvist is my all time fav cinematographer.. Really happy to see this video.. you almost covered everything about him.. There is so many starting points to learn from this video: lights, directors, life ect.... great work wolfcrow
Wonderfully and interesting! I first heard of him after seeing the Movie "Salka Valka" from 1954....I thought even as a mere teenager what beautiful photography, such light and clarity and atmosphere in it all....
Great video. Few years ago when I watched Winter Light, I was completely shocked by his image, and I wanted to know about him more specifically. This is the video satisfies my desire. Thank you!
I loved your essay here as well as on Gregg Toland. I would like one on Subrata Mitra, the cinematographer of Satyajit Ray (for some ten films) and Ismail Merchant.
As a traditional artist, and aspiring film maker, I have always loved Nykvist's work. Thanks for this video. By the way, what does the last statement in the video say? It's partially blocked by thumbnails. All I can see is, "A cameraman's work is not done until there is a properly lit and approved opening....."
Wow, bloody fantastic video! Wouldn't mind if it was longer and it analysed more thoroughly some specific shots or sequences. In any case, I have a few other suggestions of cinematographers for you to take on, which I believe are some of the greatest of all time, although maybe not as well known: Mark Lee Ping Bin, Sergey Urusevsky, Kazuo Miyagawa, Giorgos Arvanitis, Vadim Yusov, Slawomir Idziak. Keep up the great job. PS: Obviously subbed.
Please make a video about Georgy Rerberg. He and Andrei Tarkovsky pulled of some very impressive cinematic work, and there's a lot to cover from Tarkovsky's book "Sculpting In Time." Would be great to see!
It should be noted at 10:50 you give an incorrect name for a film. You say "Canary" which is a bird. But the film is "Cannery" which is a factory where fish are prepared then put into cans for sale. There is a difference. www.imdb.com/title/tt0083717/combined
Caleb Deschanel would be excellent for your analysis. I think his collaboration with Carroll Ballard represents some of the greatest short films ever made. You may enjoy an essay I wrote about one of these shorts: directors-vision.com/2017/02/13/greatest-film-youve-never-seen/
That was a great video and a great history lesson at the same time. A director and a cinematographer have a lot to learn from one another if they are open to it. Niqvist's case reminds me of Giorgos Arvanitis (www.imdb.com/name/nm0002187/?ref_=fn_al_nm_1) who started off as a self taught cinematographer working for not that demanding comedies shot mostly in studios ,to rise up to the most important Greek cinematographer up to date when his road crossed with Theo Angelopoulos who brought a lot of fresh ideas from Paris. There is a funny story about how they couldn't understand one another when they first worked together. Since you are interested in old school cinematographers maybe you want to take a look in Walter Lassally's work.Check out what he considers his best work ever here th-cam.com/video/ti6baXMp138/w-d-xo.html (unfortunately ther are no greek subs in this one)
Tarkovsky is only modernist worthy serious academic study. Bresson being the other GREAT modernist. Oh and we call it "magic hour" not golden hour with Almedros being THE master of that look.
what about the architecture and the clothes of that era? What about the landscape? Nobody talks about it. Are you sure is only the light and composition that make a good photography? If you say that cinematography is all about punctum and not a mixture of it and studium, then all the movies should be filmed in some backyard. Definetelly, a soviet building in the background from the 70´s won´t create the same visual impact, definetelly other. I´ve watched low budget movies with good comp or light, still looking crap, just because the clothes of Julio Caesar didn´t have very much detail on them or because of the fake wall behind him. Every person I know find 1930´s- 1960´s photography very pleasing because of the ¨texture¨ of that era. Marlyin driving an old Cadillac vs. Kardashian in some Ferrari, Wtf. Sven´s photography of some modern movies is crap compared to his b&w movies because the props or location don´t help. Some Woody Allen´s movies look like old Van Damme´s movies, they look crap. Is very easy to make a good photography when the background also helps. The job ot the photographer is limited by the location, which is limited by the budget of the film.Even your story is limited by location even though you may afford the best DP in the world. Be creative, they say, yeah that´s simple to say. ¨Give me a camera and a good lens. That´s all I need¨ Really? I want you to shoot Predator. I can´t really shoot Predator in my own garden, can I? I can´t afford to go the the jungle or just to recreate it. Or just shoot the same scene in a room with white walls in a modern kitshy house with modern clothes and it will probably look crap, not the same effect, impact, etc because it is very difficult to photograph. Imagine Sven´s b&w movies in colour shot with some crappy digital camera. Still great, but not the same impact. Film is still film. Let´s shoot that Sven´s cabbin from his ¨low budget¨ movie because it looks good. I can´t even find a simple wooden cabbin in my area, there are only of concrete with kitschy architecture. It will cost me a fortune to build one from scratch. In my story there´s a wooden cabbin. No wooden cabbin, not my story.
As a cinematographer myself... Amazing video and tribute. Thank you.
You're welcome!
Probably my favorite DP of all time. What a great name, too. Sven Nykvist. Looks awesome in print!
Berman is a favorite of mine. Thank you for helping me understand one of his most important and outstanding cinematographers, Nykvist!
He has been one of my main career inspirations whenever i looked beyond film's true golden age. Your tribute was very thorough. I have a BFA in Cinematography. This type of light artistry has been completely lost because our age is aural, not visual. We view art now nostalgically. Many thanks from deep inside the gallows of a lost Hollywood. Long live film, which digital has desperately tried to kill off.
The most comprehensive and interesting analysis of a cinematographer I've seen up to now. Truly an amazing job. Thank you wolfcrow.
You're welcome!
Thanks for your passion and communicative prowess in dealing with The great Sven N.
Thank you, this was a wonderful exposition of Sven Nykvist's work.
As a photographer with a background in Film and eagerness to learn, I highly appreciate your videos.
You're welcome!
Sven Nykvist is my all time fav cinematographer.. Really happy to see this video.. you almost covered everything about him.. There is so many starting points to learn from this video: lights, directors, life ect.... great work wolfcrow
Thank you!
wolfcrow
"Bless characters to life with light" , well said .
Wonderfully and interesting! I first heard of him after seeing the Movie "Salka Valka" from 1954....I thought even as a mere teenager what beautiful photography, such light and clarity and atmosphere in it all....
Thanks!
Damn, I was a fan of Sven Nykvist before, but I admit this video really opened my eyes to the greatness of his work
This was a great primer to one of the best to ever do it. I will be coming back to this many times. Thank you.
You're welcome!
As a lighting technician for me The Master of Light is "Good". Thanks for posting and good job!
Great breakdown of Sven Nykvist
Thank you!
Really interesting summary of his cinematography. Love Persona, such an incredible masterwork.
Thanks!
Your video essays are beautiful and informative. Thank you for sharing your time and expertise with us.
You're welcome!
Wow, I really wasn't expecting this twenty minute video. Excellent!
Thank you!
proud of your work and dedication by the way
Loving and appreciating your channel wolfcrow!
Thanks!
Great video. Few years ago when I watched Winter Light, I was completely shocked by his image, and I wanted to know about him more specifically. This is the video satisfies my desire. Thank you!
I loved your essay here as well as on Gregg Toland. I would like one on Subrata Mitra, the cinematographer of Satyajit Ray (for some ten films) and Ismail Merchant.
This was a fantastic lesson. Thank you.
Hi, I'm not a cinematographer but I aspire to become one even when I'm old. Love your analysis. Owen.
Thanks, Owen.
Amazing! I would wish for an analysis of Michael Ballhaus as well! Thank you for your work!
You're welcome! He's on the list!
Woow tanks for taking the time to make this awsome content!!!
You're welcome!
Amazing work!!!! Thanks so much
You're welcome!
I´ve just loved this
Thank you, I learnt a lot from this, and really enjoyed it.
Incredible video, as always.
I would love to see an anlysis of Owen Roizman or Darius Khondji in the future!
Thank you, sure!
Sean Bobbitt is great as well.
Well done, sir!
Thank you!
Thanks for this amazing video.
You're welcome!
Thankyou Wolfcrow
You're welcome!
Great film! Thanks!
You're welcome!
Honoring the greatest.
Great video. You should do one about mexican cinematographer Gabriel Figueroa. He worked in various films with Luis Buñuel.
Thanks, I'll add him to the list!
As a traditional artist, and aspiring film maker, I have always loved Nykvist's work. Thanks for this video. By the way, what does the last statement in the video say? It's partially blocked by thumbnails. All I can see is, "A cameraman's work is not done until there is a properly lit and approved opening....."
Beautiful montages!
Thank you!
Wow, bloody fantastic video! Wouldn't mind if it was longer and it analysed more thoroughly some specific shots or sequences. In any case, I have a few other suggestions of cinematographers for you to take on, which I believe are some of the greatest of all time, although maybe not as well known: Mark Lee Ping Bin, Sergey Urusevsky, Kazuo Miyagawa, Giorgos Arvanitis, Vadim Yusov, Slawomir Idziak. Keep up the great job. PS: Obviously subbed.
Thank you, they're all on the list!
Excellent
Thank you!
great video ! Thank you very much for your work :)
I'd love to see a video on Karl Freund or Fritz Arno Wagner!
Please make a video about Georgy Rerberg. He and Andrei Tarkovsky pulled of some very impressive cinematic work, and there's a lot to cover from Tarkovsky's book "Sculpting In Time." Would be great to see!
Yeah it's a great book!
Magnificent job!
Max Anderson Films Thank you!
Excellent. Thanks!!!
Just found your channel, amazing content! Subscribed :)
this is wonderfull work. Thanks! Could you do Nestor Almendros??
Thanks, sure!
amazing video...
Thank you for this.
You're welcome!
Awesome!
Really great. I hope you do Christopher Doyle
Thanks, sure!
Sven Nykvist's "autopilot" movies blow other cinematographers' best work out of the water
Robert Elswit, Andrew Lesnie, Dante Spinotti, Guillermo Navarro, Dariusz Wolski, Matthew Libatique, Bill Pope and Barry Ackroyd please!! :)
Absolutely!
Fantastic thanks
brilliant, per usual.
Thank you!
thanks for the video!
You're welcome!
Great job!
Thanks!
Master!
How about Nestor Almendros, Greg Toland and Don Peterman
You should do Raoul Coutard!
Great video. Ever thought about doing one on John Seale?
Thanks, yes!
William A. Fraker? Or perhaps Jordan Cronenweth!
accidentally clicking like to the video when it was really meant for the ad
I know he is not seen as a great director, but it would be great to learn what you think about Michael bay or his cinematography?
What about Georgy Rerberg's work with Tarkovsky?
Edvard Aviles who shot Nostalghia?
Edvard Aviles Not sure, even though they are incredibly beautiful films, he has only made 2 with him
Tarkovsky's best work was with Vadim Yusov
Rerberg shoot "Stalker" (first part)
Awesome 😇👌🏽👍🏻
Robert Yeoman and Michael Balhaus
awesome!!
Thanks!
The only modern day DP who comes close to Sven is Chivo.
gasper noe cinematography pretty interesting can you do one on him
Sure
Gunner fisher please
Awesome! Thanks!
And I think Michael Ballhaus deserves analysis
Thank you, sure, he's on the list!
I think Gabriel Figueroa is another great master
Larry Fong & Zac Snyder please :)
Stockholm is in Sweden, other than that, nice video!
What's the Juliette Binoche film he shot?
ROBERT ELSWIT!!!!! PLEASE!!!!!
Sure!
Would be nice to have something similar on Subrata Mitra, Ashoke Mehta.
Amazing videos, looking forward to watching many more.
Thanks, they're on the list!
Would you do a video on Wally Pfister?
Greg Tolland!!!!
Alain-Marcoen SBC, Belgian cinematographer
A+
Came back to Sweden from... Stockholm??
I do not understand much of the tecnisisms, please help me.
It should be noted at 10:50 you give an incorrect name for a film.
You say "Canary" which is a bird. But the film is "Cannery" which is a factory where fish are prepared then put into cans for sale. There is a difference.
www.imdb.com/title/tt0083717/combined
Sorry but one more suggestion, Matthew Libatique
Keep them coming!
Please do Robert Yeoman (Wes Anderson's DOP)
He's on the list!
Film at 9:36?
Caleb Deschanel would be excellent for your analysis. I think his collaboration with Carroll Ballard represents some of the greatest short films ever made. You may enjoy an essay I wrote about one of these shorts: directors-vision.com/2017/02/13/greatest-film-youve-never-seen/
U have been researching styles of numerous cinematographers...but u missed a greatest of great cinematographer.."Subrata Mitra"
Wally Pfister or even Steven Soderbergh (under his alias Peter Andrews)
Sure!
That was a great video and a great history lesson at the same time. A director and a cinematographer have a lot to learn from one another if they are open to it. Niqvist's case reminds me of Giorgos Arvanitis (www.imdb.com/name/nm0002187/?ref_=fn_al_nm_1) who started off as a self taught cinematographer working for not that demanding comedies shot mostly in studios ,to rise up to the most important Greek cinematographer up to date when his road crossed with Theo Angelopoulos who brought a lot of fresh ideas from Paris. There is a funny story about how they couldn't understand one another when they first worked together. Since you are interested in old school cinematographers maybe you want to take a look in Walter Lassally's work.Check out what he considers his best work ever here th-cam.com/video/ti6baXMp138/w-d-xo.html (unfortunately ther are no greek subs in this one)
Thanks!
Tarkovsky is only modernist worthy serious academic study. Bresson being the other GREAT modernist. Oh and we call it "magic hour" not golden hour with Almedros being THE master of that look.
what about the architecture and the clothes of that era? What about the landscape? Nobody talks about it. Are you sure is only the light and composition that make a good photography? If you say that cinematography is all about punctum and not a mixture of it and studium, then all the movies should be filmed in some backyard. Definetelly, a soviet building in the background from the 70´s won´t create the same visual impact, definetelly other. I´ve watched low budget movies with good comp or light, still looking crap, just because the clothes of Julio Caesar didn´t have very much detail on them or because of the fake wall behind him. Every person I know find 1930´s- 1960´s photography very pleasing because of the ¨texture¨ of that era. Marlyin driving an old Cadillac vs. Kardashian in some Ferrari, Wtf. Sven´s photography of some modern movies is crap compared to his b&w movies because the props or location don´t help. Some Woody Allen´s movies look like old Van Damme´s movies, they look crap. Is very easy to make a good photography when the background also helps. The job ot the photographer is limited by the location, which is limited by the budget of the film.Even your story is limited by location even though you may afford the best DP in the world. Be creative, they say, yeah that´s simple to say. ¨Give me a camera and a good lens. That´s all I need¨ Really? I want you to shoot Predator. I can´t really shoot Predator in my own garden, can I? I can´t afford to go the the jungle or just to recreate it. Or just shoot the same scene in a room with white walls in a modern kitshy house with modern clothes and it will probably look crap, not the same effect, impact, etc because it is very difficult to photograph. Imagine Sven´s b&w movies in colour shot with some crappy digital camera. Still great, but not the same impact. Film is still film. Let´s shoot that Sven´s cabbin from his ¨low budget¨ movie because it looks good. I can´t even find a simple wooden cabbin in my area, there are only of concrete with kitschy architecture. It will cost me a fortune to build one from scratch. In my story there´s a wooden cabbin. No wooden cabbin, not my story.
Of course it's important. You can make good architecture look ugly through poor lighting.
Thanks for your passion and communicative prowess in dealing with The great Sven N.