Your comments on progressive covenantalism (PC): you framed it as an exegetically derived structure and presented the CT of Kline as historical. Isn’t this making the point of PC, that CT isn’t so much so exegetical as it is historical. It’s almost as though the confessions trump the exegesis of scripture. I understand where your coming from but the historical arguments shouldn’t outweigh the exegesis and for somehow that is an argument against PC. I would appreciate a more full discussion on PC and new covenant theology. Also, your discussion with Dr. Wellum on the London Lyceum was great, maybe have him on your channel :)
Your comments on progressive covenantalism (PC): you framed it as an exegetically derived structure and presented the CT of Kline as historical. Isn’t this making the point of PC, that CT isn’t so much so exegetical as it is historical. It’s almost as though the confessions trump the exegesis of scripture.
I understand where your coming from but the historical arguments shouldn’t outweigh the exegesis and for somehow that is an argument against PC. I would appreciate a more full discussion on PC and new covenant theology. Also, your discussion with Dr. Wellum on the London Lyceum was great, maybe have him on your channel :)