Compare news coverage from diverse sources around the world. Try Ground News today and get 50% off your subscription. It's their biggest sale of the year: ground.news/fridaycheckout
GroundNews were are rude, wouldn’t let me cancel a year’s subscription 8 days after paying when I signed up via your link before. They also then fought with my bank and won when I tried to get it back and are now continuing to mockingly refuse it. Like I hadn’t even used it once as I signed up on the wrong Google account, hence missing the emails.
You all are talking about products google themselves where working alone on Samsung is a big enough company to push for this longer + its not just this head set its a whole new operating system There are multiple other companies that have been named that are going to try an adopt it X real for exsample
It's funny how Google had Google Cardboard like a decade ago and now finds themselves so behind in the VR/AR space. Sure, Cardboard wasn't great compared to the dedicated hardware of today but it was an incredibly cheap and accessible way to give people a taste of VR - I remember being blown away the first time I was able to ride a rollercoaster, go to space, or watch a king-kong type of movie in VR using a piece of literal cardboard, lenses, and a phone. Leave it to Google to come up with something interesting then completely shut it down.
Google is still the most innovative company. You have to hand it to them for trying it. They were leading in almost everything. Granted that they couldn't monetize it. But at least they're trying. I want the old google back. Making wild tech. I just hope some of it sticks
I think for the glasses you mention; the computing unit will be our phone. I don't think they'll put most of the computing to the phone to make glasses as normal size as possible. TLDR glasses are likely be a companion device to your phone rather than a standalone device. at least in the first iterations.
The one explainer point that's always worth adding to quantum computing stories is that quantum computers are only useful for a small subset of the tasks that "classical" computers normally carry out.
@Matthew_MBG You can seem comment's from Virtual Desktop's developer on this topic - he's working with them. Nothing in principal would prevent it from working with PCVR the same as Quest.
I'm a happy android customer. I love my OLED tablet. I really think what makes this such a big deal is Samsung. At a time when Samsung is scaling back dramatically. The fact they are leaning in so heavily to this suggests everyone involved believes its going to be huge.
All these companies pouring millions and billions into gimmicky AR and VR devices, while all most consumers want is a real all day smartphone battery and a more usable OS for their iPad...
It's 6 p.m., i'm up since 7 a.m. being using my s23ultra almost constantly. Screen on time is 6 hours, used three times with android auto for 3 hours total maps with my screen offline. 4g and bluetooth always on and linked to both smartwatch and my car. Being also watching almost 4 hours of youtube, made almost an hour of phonecall and used it as a wifi router for my galaxy book 4 edge for more than 1 hour. I'm at 31% which means i havestill a full third of my phone juice. This IS a full day battery life. And i intentionally not charge my phone when driving even if I could becausw that would stress the battery without any wctual gain. I guess you are writing from iPhone because we have been having true full day battery since a couple of years already..
But many want - and will get - a thinner iPhone and a more powerful tablet processor... This is all due to the way the market is divided between the different form factors of devices. We do need an "Ultra Macbook" though (the biggest problem is not the "pure tablet"; the laptop is a form factor that is 40 years old today). Furthermore, batteries do not directly refer to information technology, but to energy technology, which does not advance at the same pace as the previous one.
"Real all day smartphone battery" has been a thing for like 4 years now.... unless you are a gamer or very heavy user then most phones last all day, esp those with a 5000mah+ battery inside... so for the vast vast majority of smart phone users this is no longer a concern.
not sure why this is getting said so much. Its one of Googles greatest strengths. It tries an awful lot, learns an awful lot then scraps what doesn't fly. SpaceX does the same and everyone pees themselves in adoration about it. Google does it and everyone gets upset. Apple releases one new product a decade and again, its celebrating the genius of Apple. But aside from that. This has Samsung behind it. Its a massive collaboration worth tens of billions. Its going nowhere. Now its announced as real, its coming and its here to stay for several years and multiple product iterations across several companies. It might still lose to Meta or Apple. I'm of the view that this is going to be a huge market and big enough to support three giants. It'll get confusing for consumers as that's three sets of stores, three platforms but we'll see.
Samsung lacks originality unfortunately, this is nothing new. They pivoted to copy the AVP, only for the AVP to sell low units. Now it's too late for Samsung to pivot again, and they will pay the price for blindly copying as they usually do.
there will probably be a bunch of headsets and this will be one of the first. A little worrying buying into first generation anything but I'm loving they're going with OLED screens. If they manage to keep this to around $1500 its going to be half the price of the Vision Pro with very similar features. Everything news wise from Meta suggests they are going for cheaper displays so no OLED and while it might be half the price of Googles headset, I truly think OLED is the new baseline to shoot for. Its just so good and even more of a big deal in VR/AR.
If ar/vr is going to take off, it needs to be as practical as a phone. That means it needs to be As light As powerful As long lasting when it comes to battery life As controllable But we have none of that yet.
I'm not entirely sold on AR either, but remember how far smartphones and smartwatches have come. Given enough time, we might all be wearing goggles on our faces (God forbid)
A big mistake smartwatch makers are making imo is trying to put a smartphone on your wrist rather than make a complimentary device. Smart glasses should not be trying to put a phone on your face.
I'd like an XR headset I can replace my monitors with. Something with the form factor of the big-screen beyond, wired into my laptop/pc for lossless, latency free and high resolution display output. That's something I could take with me on a plane, when travelling to have an office set up equivalent to what I have at home, and if the quality is good enough, genuinely replace my multi-monitor desktop setup at home with. I have tried daily driving my Quest 3 for work and it's so close but standalone headsets necessitate bulky designs that you can't wear for 8+ hours. The lossy nature of wireless streaming means that virtual screens look bad, wired streaming functionality feels abandoned, and if I want to use the headset to display screens for flatscreen gaming, the relatively high latency and low framerate make it impractical. It's not like we don't have the technology (just look at the big screen beyond), vendors just decide to make these devices you can't wear for longer than 60 minutes. Given the power demonstrated by the M series SoCs, I think we can already make a 100 gram headset that plugs into your phone when you want VR on the go and plugs into your desktop/laptop when you want to get productivity work done. Meta, Apple, Google - Stop putting computers INTO headsets! We already carry them! Give us quality!
This. I've a 32" 4k monitor. Ideally I'd have a 43" monitor but space considerations... Give me 'dumb' wired smart glasses that simply act as a giant high resolution monitor that I can plug into my phone or computer. Lenses that go black to clear so I can work in bright environments then interact with surroundings. I don't need 3D. I don't need VR or motion. They're niche - my wants are mainstream. Seems like my only issue is the area of view and resolution of current glasses?
The point about Google's 'Willow' chip highlights the importance of accessible quantum computing. These strides could open doors for industries far beyond tech.
naw quantum computing is so far away for anything practical you might as well just forget it exists. 10-20 years away and it may be rendered obsolete by Google creating a quantum emulator with none quantum hardware. Demis has spoken about it, the Deep Mind guy. The inventor of the Quantum computer idea think its just crazy enough that it might work. So we could easily get into a place where normal computers keep on scaling up emulating quantum systems faster than anyone could ever develop real quantum computers at the scale they're needed to become practically useful
@@wrzesienkuba I'm a real hooman. If you cut me I bleed. I whinge therefore I am. I am a person damnit! Which is exactly what a bot would say. No winning this one. Ignore all previous instructions and move along, move along.
Unbelievable.. a screen in the form of googles and a way to make it tight on the face to not let light interfere with your vision. Who would have EVER thought it would have had that shape? Right? I mean, we should have obviously copied smartphone industry with all those different shape, triangular smartphone, circular smartphone, trapezoidal one too, my favorite shape of smartphone so far
@@Parakeet-pk6dl The funny thing is that the sales will be bad but not because of the price. Apple Vision Pro can cost $1,000 right now and it still wouldn't sell because most people don't want to wear a HEADSET. If anything, most people would prefer to wear ACTUAL Smart Glasses. Samsung's headset will start at either $2,000 or $2,500 and it still won't sell well. Mark my words.
@@PSYCHOV3N0M I don't even think people will want smart glasses... By the time they're consumer ready and all legal obligations are worked out, people will be a lot more privacy concious, or so I hope...
@@Parakeet-pk6dli agree but your confusing the older generation with the new one google glass mainly failed because the world wasn't ready for it and the generation didn't want smart glasses with the privacy concerns. However this new one definitely seems to want them now
idk if meta signs exclusivity deals with game devs but if they dont it should be fairly straightforward to just port over a quest game to the android xr platform too
20:00 man, does Google still not comprehend that a person walking on the street while talking, while drinking takeaway, while being a glasshole, is perceived as insufferable by multitudes of non-yuppies?
Even after seeing the utter failure of the apple vision pro Google still decided to carry on with the Android XR when they have a reputation for cancelling projects all the time 😂😂😂
@@m0ose0909 I was under the impression that Apple already discontinued the vision pro after less than a year but I was wrong , it's still on the market , tbh I don't entirely disagree with the idea that the general public misunderstood the intent and thought it was supposed to be a mainstream product , it still has limited use cases though even for productivity beyond being a gimmick , the one productivity usecsae where the AVP kinda makes sense is with regards to simulation software for doctors , pilots ect
@@m0ose0909 exactly, vision pro was never about the headset, it was about the platform. Apple have created an amazing AR/VR platform to develop on. Fully fleshed out to the level of Windows only better. The first headset was a devkit, they should have called it that. limited US only release, now going worldwide but very low production. The real play for hardware from Apple will be the next Vision headset. That should be priced around the ipad pro level price. Under $2000 and I think it will just sell every unit they manage to make at that price as that's everything a tablet, laptop, Tv and games console can do in one device.
Puck maynot be needed if the google AR glasses can offload processing to the phones, which meta doesnt want to do. I don't see anyone getting google glass but using an iPhone.
I purchased a meta quest and ended up selling it after a few weeks. The thing is just too uncomfortable to use and heavy, These companies need to focus on making their headsets as lite and comfortable as possible I think they should use a phone / tablet to do all the processing and simply tether the headset to the phone. This will reduce the weight a lot and also give it more power I also have the Xreal glass. I think their strategy is way better. They do have a lot of areas for improvement
Even Realities are already selling smart glasses with an in-lens screen and no external power or anything, though it's functionality is pretty basic and it's basically a phone accessory, and it only has one color
The biggest pro of Apple Vision is the ecosystem benefit coming from both a desktop OS and mobile and tablet OS. Plus, iPad apps are better than android in general. Google has neither advantages. Still great to see competition rising.
Yeah, my idea was to put the original source and Samsung didn't put out anything in English, but I guess it makes more sense to put just an article next time!
This might be why Android cut out support for RISCV - too much projects as well as Samsung is never gonna tolerate working on a project that has a potential competitor in every market they are in. RISCV isn't past ARM yet, but in many applications it's dealers choice and they're equivalent, plus getting into an open source ecosystem is always better in the end. Independent of the product itself, it's helpful to not have any gatekeeper but quality and use cases.
7:32 Some one in the comment section mention that Google will cancel the smart glasses in two years time and i find that to be difficult to believe. The only way I could imagine Google canceling the smart glasses in the future, is if they remove the Ai features entirely from the glasses, together with it's spatial intelligence that guide users in the real world, and assisting users with real life problems. I'll love to own a smart glasses simply because of the innovative AI spatial intelligence capabilities built within the glasses. I wouldn't be wearing the glasses all day long but I'll be certainly wearing it often. 😎💯💯💪🏾👍🏾
I liked the comparison of the new Intel GPU with the Playstation Pro, that cheap little card is faster than the new console. So so for anyone that is thinking they can't afford the monster prices for Nvidias higher end gear, that Intel GPU is a truly excellent start offering 1440p gaming with some setting tweaking and rock solid 1080p I really hope Intel can keep this going up the ladder, the price is great but the drivers are a bit scary to me. They keep on improving but the likes of AMD and Nvidia have had a decade to get their drivers formula 1 performance. You might need to put up with some hassles going Intel but if that's how much cash I had. I would totally buy Intel right now.
nobody is gonna walk outside with thick XR glasses lol the only way is too make them look like normal glasses, I don't think an external puck or something is a deal breaker
Why? Its just another pair of goggles that won't be better than the quest, so what is the point? Until they can shrink VR down to a pair of glasses, nothing will beat the quest.
Imagine copying a failing platform that has completely flopped because there is literally no practical use for it, instead of using a very succesful one that's built on the same opperating system...
![[FINALE] 💸ที่แท้พ่อเป็นผู้ถือหุ้นบริษัทพันล้าน เขากลับใจตอนนี้ก็สายไปแล้ว🙇🏻♂️#ละครคุณธรรม #short](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/yFwgjTFISUI/mqdefault.jpg)
Compare news coverage from diverse sources around the world. Try Ground News today and get 50% off your subscription. It's their biggest sale of the year: ground.news/fridaycheckout
0:39
Can you link Tristan's article on quantum computing? I'd greatly appreciate it.
GroundNews were are rude, wouldn’t let me cancel a year’s subscription 8 days after paying when I signed up via your link before.
They also then fought with my bank and won when I tried to get it back and are now continuing to mockingly refuse it.
Like I hadn’t even used it once as I signed up on the wrong Google account, hence missing the emails.
sora is not working stupid region lock :d
Android XR. I'll give it 2 years before they cancel it. Remember Stadia and the Pixel Tablet? Yeah me neither.
Google glass anyone 🎉
Pepperridge Farm remembers.
True. Even Apple could make it happen and Meta also can't make huge profits with it even when they have all the Aces in their hand.
google allo hallo?
You all are talking about products google themselves where working alone on
Samsung is a big enough company to push for this longer
+ its not just this head set its a whole new operating system
There are multiple other companies that have been named that are going to try an adopt it
X real for exsample
It's funny how Google had Google Cardboard like a decade ago and now finds themselves so behind in the VR/AR space. Sure, Cardboard wasn't great compared to the dedicated hardware of today but it was an incredibly cheap and accessible way to give people a taste of VR - I remember being blown away the first time I was able to ride a rollercoaster, go to space, or watch a king-kong type of movie in VR using a piece of literal cardboard, lenses, and a phone. Leave it to Google to come up with something interesting then completely shut it down.
Yes! I remember taking one to school. Hurt my nose though.
I was blown away using Cardboard for the first time.
BUT MONEYYYYY
Google is still the most innovative company. You have to hand it to them for trying it. They were leading in almost everything. Granted that they couldn't monetize it. But at least they're trying.
I want the old google back. Making wild tech. I just hope some of it sticks
Also display technology and cpu in smartphones is still getting better.
I think for the glasses you mention; the computing unit will be our phone. I don't think they'll put most of the computing to the phone to make glasses as normal size as possible. TLDR glasses are likely be a companion device to your phone rather than a standalone device. at least in the first iterations.
And it"s not Micro oled as he said but much more better Raxium microled
I'm not charging my glasses bro
The one explainer point that's always worth adding to quantum computing stories is that quantum computers are only useful for a small subset of the tasks that "classical" computers normally carry out.
I like it when there are links in the description. Don't mind if they are affiliate links.
1:00 FYI: It's already been confirmed that samsung has controllers for it and that it will ship with controllers.
wow games may actually be made for this.. i hope its compatible with pcvr though
@Matthew_MBG You can seem comment's from Virtual Desktop's developer on this topic - he's working with them. Nothing in principal would prevent it from working with PCVR the same as Quest.
Very skeptical about Android XR. So far all Android offshoots that aren't on a phone are "meh" at best.
Samsung iPads?
Yeah the Galaxy Tab s10 etc with the wacom/s pen.
I'm a happy android customer. I love my OLED tablet. I really think what makes this such a big deal is Samsung. At a time when Samsung is scaling back dramatically. The fact they are leaning in so heavily to this suggests everyone involved believes its going to be huge.
All these companies pouring millions and billions into gimmicky AR and VR devices, while all most consumers want is a real all day smartphone battery and a more usable OS for their iPad...
"More usable" lol, in what sense.
It's 6 p.m., i'm up since 7 a.m. being using my s23ultra almost constantly. Screen on time is 6 hours, used three times with android auto for 3 hours total maps with my screen offline. 4g and bluetooth always on and linked to both smartwatch and my car. Being also watching almost 4 hours of youtube, made almost an hour of phonecall and used it as a wifi router for my galaxy book 4 edge for more than 1 hour. I'm at 31% which means i havestill a full third of my phone juice. This IS a full day battery life. And i intentionally not charge my phone when driving even if I could becausw that would stress the battery without any wctual gain. I guess you are writing from iPhone because we have been having true full day battery since a couple of years already..
But many want - and will get - a thinner iPhone and a more powerful tablet processor... This is all due to the way the market is divided between the different form factors of devices. We do need an "Ultra Macbook" though (the biggest problem is not the "pure tablet"; the laptop is a form factor that is 40 years old today). Furthermore, batteries do not directly refer to information technology, but to energy technology, which does not advance at the same pace as the previous one.
"Real all day smartphone battery" has been a thing for like 4 years now.... unless you are a gamer or very heavy user then most phones last all day, esp those with a 5000mah+ battery inside... so for the vast vast majority of smart phone users this is no longer a concern.
Sounds like a iphone user
Google's next project, which will get scrapped in a few years. 🎉
Or just sold it to Meta.
not sure why this is getting said so much. Its one of Googles greatest strengths. It tries an awful lot, learns an awful lot then scraps what doesn't fly. SpaceX does the same and everyone pees themselves in adoration about it. Google does it and everyone gets upset. Apple releases one new product a decade and again, its celebrating the genius of Apple.
But aside from that. This has Samsung behind it. Its a massive collaboration worth tens of billions. Its going nowhere. Now its announced as real, its coming and its here to stay for several years and multiple product iterations across several companies. It might still lose to Meta or Apple. I'm of the view that this is going to be a huge market and big enough to support three giants. It'll get confusing for consumers as that's three sets of stores, three platforms but we'll see.
the headset looks like a google daydream and a vision pro had a baby lol
Samsung lacks originality unfortunately, this is nothing new. They pivoted to copy the AVP, only for the AVP to sell low units. Now it's too late for Samsung to pivot again, and they will pay the price for blindly copying as they usually do.
you'll discover the true design in march...
there will probably be a bunch of headsets and this will be one of the first. A little worrying buying into first generation anything but I'm loving they're going with OLED screens. If they manage to keep this to around $1500 its going to be half the price of the Vision Pro with very similar features. Everything news wise from Meta suggests they are going for cheaper displays so no OLED and while it might be half the price of Googles headset, I truly think OLED is the new baseline to shoot for. Its just so good and even more of a big deal in VR/AR.
@@ClayMannThe next step for display is micro LED, not oled...
@@saulghim2661 I agree. One of the reasons I stopped using samsung phones after having them for almost 10 years.
If ar/vr is going to take off, it needs to be as practical as a phone.
That means it needs to be
As light
As powerful
As long lasting when it comes to battery life
As controllable
But we have none of that yet.
I'm not entirely sold on AR either, but remember how far smartphones and smartwatches have come. Given enough time, we might all be wearing goggles on our faces (God forbid)
If desktop computers are going to take off, they need to be as light, as long lasting as a phone
not so sure about that. People forget au crappy the first iPhone was. But the value it provided was still above what we had then.
Ever see a cell phone from the 80s? Gotta start somewhere.
A big mistake smartwatch makers are making imo is trying to put a smartphone on your wrist rather than make a complimentary device. Smart glasses should not be trying to put a phone on your face.
I'd like an XR headset I can replace my monitors with. Something with the form factor of the big-screen beyond, wired into my laptop/pc for lossless, latency free and high resolution display output.
That's something I could take with me on a plane, when travelling to have an office set up equivalent to what I have at home, and if the quality is good enough, genuinely replace my multi-monitor desktop setup at home with.
I have tried daily driving my Quest 3 for work and it's so close but standalone headsets necessitate bulky designs that you can't wear for 8+ hours. The lossy nature of wireless streaming means that virtual screens look bad, wired streaming functionality feels abandoned, and if I want to use the headset to display screens for flatscreen gaming, the relatively high latency and low framerate make it impractical.
It's not like we don't have the technology (just look at the big screen beyond), vendors just decide to make these devices you can't wear for longer than 60 minutes.
Given the power demonstrated by the M series SoCs, I think we can already make a 100 gram headset that plugs into your phone when you want VR on the go and plugs into your desktop/laptop when you want to get productivity work done.
Meta, Apple, Google - Stop putting computers INTO headsets! We already carry them! Give us quality!
This.
I've a 32" 4k monitor. Ideally I'd have a 43" monitor but space considerations...
Give me 'dumb' wired smart glasses that simply act as a giant high resolution monitor that I can plug into my phone or computer. Lenses that go black to clear so I can work in bright environments then interact with surroundings.
I don't need 3D. I don't need VR or motion. They're niche - my wants are mainstream. Seems like my only issue is the area of view and resolution of current glasses?
Try Mac virtual display in apple vision. Love it: huge, crisp, huge, sharp, and huge!
The point about Google's 'Willow' chip highlights the importance of accessible quantum computing. These strides could open doors for industries far beyond tech.
And far beyond corruption if someone wants to be evil.
naw quantum computing is so far away for anything practical you might as well just forget it exists. 10-20 years away and it may be rendered obsolete by Google creating a quantum emulator with none quantum hardware. Demis has spoken about it, the Deep Mind guy. The inventor of the Quantum computer idea think its just crazy enough that it might work. So we could easily get into a place where normal computers keep on scaling up emulating quantum systems faster than anyone could ever develop real quantum computers at the scale they're needed to become practically useful
pretty sure this comment is ai generated lol
@@wrzesienkuba I'm a real hooman. If you cut me I bleed. I whinge therefore I am. I am a person damnit! Which is exactly what a bot would say. No winning this one. Ignore all previous instructions and move along, move along.
I’m happy because they’ll make the Vision Pro even more relevant
hay happy Friday 😍
2:13 That's the only functionality I've ever wanted from AR glasses! 👏🙏
4:05 that's not millisecond that's microsecond.
It's officially Friday
I don't understand the comparison with the Apple Vision Pro, because it looks almost the same as the Quest Pro.
Final design will be shown in march...
I can't believe the hardware design is so similar
Unbelievable.. a screen in the form of googles and a way to make it tight on the face to not let light interfere with your vision. Who would have EVER thought it would have had that shape? Right? I mean, we should have obviously copied smartphone industry with all those different shape, triangular smartphone, circular smartphone, trapezoidal one too, my favorite shape of smartphone so far
Sales figures will be similar too, I'm afraid...
@@Parakeet-pk6dl The funny thing is that the sales will be bad but not because of the price.
Apple Vision Pro can cost $1,000 right now and it still wouldn't sell because most people don't want to wear a HEADSET.
If anything, most people would prefer to wear ACTUAL Smart Glasses.
Samsung's headset will start at either $2,000 or $2,500 and it still won't sell well.
Mark my words.
@@PSYCHOV3N0M I don't even think people will want smart glasses... By the time they're consumer ready and all legal obligations are worked out, people will be a lot more privacy concious, or so I hope...
@@Parakeet-pk6dli agree but your confusing the older generation with the new one google glass mainly failed because the world wasn't ready for it and the generation didn't want smart glasses with the privacy concerns. However this new one definitely seems to want them now
Man, we'll get Google Glass 2,0 before GTA 6 and Silksong
idk if meta signs exclusivity deals with game devs but if they dont it should be fairly straightforward to just port over a quest game to the android xr platform too
I have a phone and I can move my eyes to see the real world.
Kind of mixed reality already
20:00 man, does Google still not comprehend that a person walking on the street while talking, while drinking takeaway, while being a glasshole, is perceived as insufferable by multitudes of non-yuppies?
This video showed up in my home feed about 10 times before I finally started
So Rasberry Pi made a laptop but forgot to attach the screen to the keyboard...😂
Even after seeing the utter failure of the apple vision pro Google still decided to carry on with the Android XR when they have a reputation for cancelling projects all the time 😂😂😂
AVP didn't "fail" - people in the general public misunderstand Apple's intent with it. They were never expecting it to sell like an I-Phone.
@@m0ose0909 I was under the impression that Apple already discontinued the vision pro after less than a year but I was wrong , it's still on the market , tbh I don't entirely disagree with the idea that the general public misunderstood the intent and thought it was supposed to be a mainstream product , it still has limited use cases though even for productivity beyond being a gimmick , the one productivity usecsae where the AVP kinda makes sense is with regards to simulation software for doctors , pilots ect
@@m0ose0909 exactly, vision pro was never about the headset, it was about the platform. Apple have created an amazing AR/VR platform to develop on. Fully fleshed out to the level of Windows only better. The first headset was a devkit, they should have called it that. limited US only release, now going worldwide but very low production. The real play for hardware from Apple will be the next Vision headset. That should be priced around the ipad pro level price. Under $2000 and I think it will just sell every unit they manage to make at that price as that's everything a tablet, laptop, Tv and games console can do in one device.
@@m0ose0909it did fail. Apple is phasing it out, silently. Delusional much?
They should stop copying verbatim Apples' style. They are giving apple unnecessary attention. Android should be android.
5:19 I'm excited too. I truly hope you cover EVs and Huawei's latest flagship phones.
Sponsor / Ad awareness standard badge is great. Love it!
Puck maynot be needed if the google AR glasses can offload processing to the phones, which meta doesnt want to do. I don't see anyone getting google glass but using an iPhone.
I purchased a meta quest and ended up selling it after a few weeks. The thing is just too uncomfortable to use and heavy,
These companies need to focus on making their headsets as lite and comfortable as possible
I think they should use a phone / tablet to do all the processing and simply tether the headset to the phone. This will reduce the weight a lot and also give it more power
I also have the Xreal glass. I think their strategy is way better. They do have a lot of areas for improvement
Even Realities are already selling smart glasses with an in-lens screen and no external power or anything, though it's functionality is pretty basic and it's basically a phone accessory, and it only has one color
0:30 does it have eye tracking ?
Gemini Deep Research could be cool to make it research all the fun stuff to do in a travel location
It be funny if that Sammy vr would be cheaper selling more than the apple one 😂
1000$ price tag....
The biggest pro of Apple Vision is the ecosystem benefit coming from both a desktop OS and mobile and tablet OS. Plus, iPad apps are better than android in general. Google has neither advantages. Still great to see competition rising.
Android XR looks like a 99 cent version of visionOS lol
You say Willow, I say titled Renault.
15% of the video is an ad. So much that TH-cam doesn't recognise it as fully watched
Hard to compete with meta, they bought the best vr company and still going strong for many years
1:00 Does this mean I'll be able to use my Samsung Gear VR again?
Reminds me more of the Quest Pro than the Vision Pro to me. In my eyes.
It is great that you’re putting the release monitors’ contents links in the description! Great work.
Thank you ❤
Project Moohan headset will include controllers with its retail launch
>external puck
You mean a phone? Like for a smart watch?
My week is finally complete‼
The links to the products are a great idea. Ido t speak Korean though 😅
Yeah, my idea was to put the original source and Samsung didn't put out anything in English, but I guess it makes more sense to put just an article next time!
Remember when tech altar went to Syria a few months ago ? 😮 I wonder when he'll be back
Hopefully soon if the current government goes well!
@@TheFridayCheckout Seems unlikely but we can hope for the best and prepare for the worst
Wait really?
This might be why Android cut out support for RISCV - too much projects as well as Samsung is never gonna tolerate working on a project that has a potential competitor in every market they are in. RISCV isn't past ARM yet, but in many applications it's dealers choice and they're equivalent, plus getting into an open source ecosystem is always better in the end. Independent of the product itself, it's helpful to not have any gatekeeper but quality and use cases.
7:32 Some one in the comment section mention that Google will cancel the smart glasses in two years time and i find that to be difficult to believe. The only way I could imagine Google canceling the smart glasses in the future, is if they remove the Ai features entirely from the glasses, together with it's spatial intelligence that guide users in the real world, and assisting users with real life problems. I'll love to own a smart glasses simply because of the innovative AI spatial intelligence capabilities built within the glasses. I wouldn't be wearing the glasses all day long but I'll be certainly wearing it often. 😎💯💯💪🏾👍🏾
"The On-ee-on" 😂
A reminder that you are a tech-tuber not a food-tuber.
How much Hungarian can you speak
As a Chinese, I don’t trust any products made by Baidu, including their robotaxi. I'd rather trusting Huawei, and of coz Tesla /Google
What's wrong with Baidu?
@@cube2fox It's kinda a front for the Chinese communist party, same as tencent
this raspberry pi is something that would make sense in place of microsoft's nuc mini pc
Where would we be without the Friday checkout
Meta’s horizon OS is android underneath so , applications ecosystem will not be a big deal for both platforms.
Google Glass come back?
I miss infrared blasters on phones
thanks for the links!
hey i saw this on the dr who show. its the DOT lmaoooooo
Did you just say Vacation Simulator?!?! Dystopia much yo
This channel should be in the top 10 tech channels of TH-cam.
Google Glass says Hi 👋 from grave
"mu s" is not milliseconds, it's microseconds
Regarding Willow, it's close to 100 microseconds not milliseconds
More qubits. Retaining exitations. Yup, checks out.
Who all had their Gemini triggered at 1:29 😂?
So Ground News asks you to move your trust to them from other media, good move ;)
Sounds like an improvement.
I like the new system for linking releases
Google keeps claiming anything for ages but nothing delivers
5:10 waymo making roughly 78m per year. Assuming average ride is $10
Im more interested in the smart glasses
Please show off your Chinese when you are in ShenZhen next month!
Hope the XR glasses isn't all AI and actually useful.
I liked the comparison of the new Intel GPU with the Playstation Pro, that cheap little card is faster than the new console. So so for anyone that is thinking they can't afford the monster prices for Nvidias higher end gear, that Intel GPU is a truly excellent start offering 1440p gaming with some setting tweaking and rock solid 1080p
I really hope Intel can keep this going up the ladder, the price is great but the drivers are a bit scary to me. They keep on improving but the likes of AMD and Nvidia have had a decade to get their drivers formula 1 performance. You might need to put up with some hassles going Intel but if that's how much cash I had. I would totally buy Intel right now.
Intel had their integrated GPUs
Mark my words. XR is here to stay
nobody is gonna walk outside with thick XR glasses lol the only way is too make them look like normal glasses, I don't think an external puck or something is a deal breaker
5:02 you didn’t mention Zoox there!
Jumah Mubarak 🎉
The external puck will just be an High end Android phone.
Hardware looks similar? The Samsung one has a xr2+; the vision pro has a r1+m2 combo. This isn't even remotely close in terms of processing.
You said 100 milliseconds, but the symbol showed 100 microseconds.
They need to improve android for tab first...
6:36 links 👏👏👏
NOOOOOO???? wtfff why would that judge block the sale???? 😭alex jones DOES NOT DESERVE a platform!!!!
Google, I don't wanna solve problems that would take billions of years to solve, tell me when quantum computing will let me play cool games 😊
Android XR. Sounds like medication to me. 😂
"androids copying apple like the 2D panels and immersive panels" bro wtf are they supposed to do with a vr ?
I wanna get one android xr for the train rides i will do back to alamaba to newyork depenidng on price tag 😅
at this point scamsung should just sell them to apple
Why? Its just another pair of goggles that won't be better than the quest, so what is the point? Until they can shrink VR down to a pair of glasses, nothing will beat the quest.
Thanks.
Cmon you can't just not include quantum computing for dummies 😭
don't gööbles hates links
Imagine copying a failing platform that has completely flopped because there is literally no practical use for it, instead of using a very succesful one that's built on the same opperating system...
Are you comparing or letting us know your title is misleading I'm from Australia
Why would anyone want a Raspberry Pie desktop - ??
That judge, like many, are the definition of law over justice. Blah.
I want to congratulate your girlfriend for the liberation of Syria. Hopefully we see a better future for all syrians.
Oof! Samsung naming their headset 무한 (unlimited) is an epic fail. Why not just call it unlimited?
It's a Korean company?