Thanks for watching! I'm planning on covering angular momentum soon, but please let me know which other topics you'd like to see a video on! And here's the link to the companion video on some real-world applications of momentum - nebula.tv/videos/the-efficient-engineer-momentum-in-action-realworld-applications
Fundamental physics topics like you picked up here..Like work power energy, conservative and non conservative forces, circular motion, rigid body dynamics and lot more...
"6 months felt like forever, but this momentum video was totally worth the wait! The Efficient Engineer never fails to make complex concepts so simple to understand. More videos like this, please!"
Momentum is explained so clearly in this video. I always struggled to understand how it works in real life scenarios like collisions or rocket launches, but this video really breaks it down. I remember using SolutionInn for physics problems, and videos like this make everything click even more. Loving these simple yet powerful explanations.
15:00 Hey guys, I'm an Aerospace Engineer here. The oversimplification of the mass is wrong. The rocket mass reduces over time. The initial mass will not be the same at the V final because the rocket burns fuel and oxidizer masses. In the end, the V final will be higher due to the lower M final.
Over a period larger than 10 seconds (and really in any case if I were doing this for real professional work), I could see having to account for the change in mass. This is an example of weighing what factors do and don't matter when making your model. If I'm just doing some quick math to get an estimate for very early in the launch, I could see neglecting the change in mass and just acknowledging that this results in an underestimate of the rocket's velocity. As the saying goes, all models are wrong. Some are just useful.
مهندسی هوا فضا سخته؟ من با وجود سیستم آموزشی افتضاح ایران دوست دارم ۲سال دیگه این رشته رو انتخاب کنم و مدرک بگیرم بعد از دریافت مدرک که کارهایی از این رشته رو بهتره انتخاب کنی اگه راهنمایی کنید ممنون میشم🤍
Plz make more such videos that explain physics concepts and how they are applied to daily life. I was amazed when you said that the force required to stop a truck is given by the momentum equation: p = mv. This simple application of the equation is just so beautiful!
I have a very simple request: could you make a short video explaining how differentials and infinitesimals (which don't have a rigorous definition in standard analysis) are intuitively used in physics and engineering? There exists a gap in transition between math courses and physics/engineering courses, and students aren't taught this intuitive usage, but it's everywhere in physics and engineering. Just as an example, slicing up a hoop into infinite small masses dm, in order to take an integral to calculate inertia.
@user-ds4iz7qf6t If this question was directed at me, I am a mechanical engineer (finished university a year ago) so I have had a fair share of physics courses, where calculus has been used in ways I haven’t been taught in the math class. Just as a basic example, math teaches us that when we have a derivative dy/dx for example, that it is not a ratio, and cannot be thought of as such. The precise definition is that a derivative is a *limit* of a ratio delta x / delta y when delta y approaches 0. Yet I would see d theta for a small angle, dm for a small mass, dq for a small charge and so on everywhere used on their own. Then it became clear to me that either the math definitions aren’t correct (they are), or that there must be some way in which physicists and engineers use those differentials differently. Mathematicians will say that physicists and engineers abuse this notation, or that they use infinitesimals, which is a non-standard, albeit very intuitive way of doing calculations. The sad thing is that no one explains this intuitive usage, you just have to accept it. The problem is that this abuse of infinitesimal notation will work just fine with regular derivatives (dy/dx = 4x => dy =4xdx - this is not allowed in math, but is very common in physics), but it won’t work with second or higher derivatives (d^2y/dx^2 = 4x => d^2y = 4xdx^2 - this is completely false).
Wait at 2:40 you said gravity is canceled by normal force on the road , equal and opposite force but the equal and opposite forces has to be of the same type , so wouldn’t the gravitional force by the CAR would cancel it out ?? I am confused and if i am wrong pls correct me
Is there any way to predict the coefficient of restitution for a particular collision, if you have data from previous "ball hits rigid wall" collision tests?
6:22 v2 is wrong, isn't it? It's not a v either. You are showing speeds and naming them vectors (or worse, velocities?). You need -25 to make that add up to zero. If you don't mean -25, there where do you imply one of the velocities being a negation of the other?
For the explosion example I used vectors when developing the equation for v_2, but at the very end I showed the result as a speed because I thought it made more sense to present the result that way (note that I removed the vector arrow from above the v when I did this).
Nope, for a perfectly elastic collision , energy is conserved (because the inbound and outbound velocities are equal - so kinetic energy is the same before and after the collision). This means that no sound, heat, or light energy is transferred to the surroundings. Such collisions never occur in real life, though.
wow, excellent video with excellent video editing. I am a student.Would you please help me that where to go for such video editing ( animation)?,I am just making a 3 min video to summarize my overall concepts in visuals please show me the way at least some lower levels that will be enough to present my showcase.i am very very confused
Thanks for watching! I'm planning on covering angular momentum soon, but please let me know which other topics you'd like to see a video on!
And here's the link to the companion video on some real-world applications of momentum - nebula.tv/videos/the-efficient-engineer-momentum-in-action-realworld-applications
A video on Design for manufacturability
Motors (brushed, brushless, motor constants, motor control)
Surface tension
Will you cover gyroscopes in your angular momentum video?
Fundamental physics topics like you picked up here..Like work power energy, conservative and non conservative forces, circular motion, rigid body dynamics and lot more...
I like that the cars getting into crashes are BMWs, adds to the realism
😂😂😂
I love how all the equations and concepts we learn in physics and engineering can be rearranged and used together to solve different problems.
Wake up babe new efficient engineer video just dropped
LoL I m here
Let me sleep Get Outttt..... ಠ ೧ ಠ
Wokege
Fr
Such an annoying comment. Funny the first 9,645,67 times I've seen it.
"6 months felt like forever, but this momentum video was totally worth the wait! The Efficient Engineer never fails to make complex concepts so simple to understand. More videos like this, please!"
Who are you quoting ?
GPT@@charlieruiz6339
@@charlieruiz6339😂😂😂
Max Planck
Why doesn’t this video have more views, the quality is insane
Hi, Efficient engineer, truly I just want to thank you for your incredible contribution to countless students including myself.
Thank you
plus++
The fact that we're getting to watch and learn all this for free feels illegal. Keep up the great work Efficient Engineer!
New video, this will be a good day.
❤❤
Momentum is explained so clearly in this video. I always struggled to understand how it works in real life scenarios like collisions or rocket launches, but this video really breaks it down. I remember using SolutionInn for physics problems, and videos like this make everything click even more. Loving these simple yet powerful explanations.
I am so glad that I came across this TH-cam channel. Thank you for sharing!!
I just wanted this kinda video that explains momentum well.. I used to get confused at some stuffs.. this video covered it nicely thanks 👍
The quality of this video is amazing I like it
I've been waiting for this video for a long time
The OG engineering channel
Always great to refresh these topics with your videos. Best educational videos by far.
If possible, please make a video on work done…….
It would be of great help. Anyhow thank you for such a qualitative work you are doing
ohppp
JUST BRILLIANT VIDEO. Worth a watch for every IIT-JEE exam aspirants 💯
15:00 Hey guys, I'm an Aerospace Engineer here. The oversimplification of the mass is wrong. The rocket mass reduces over time. The initial mass will not be the same at the V final because the rocket burns fuel and oxidizer masses.
In the end, the V final will be higher due to the lower M final.
Yes , that's why we using tsiolkovsky rocket equation.But that's not point in this video.
Over a period larger than 10 seconds (and really in any case if I were doing this for real professional work), I could see having to account for the change in mass. This is an example of weighing what factors do and don't matter when making your model. If I'm just doing some quick math to get an estimate for very early in the launch, I could see neglecting the change in mass and just acknowledging that this results in an underestimate of the rocket's velocity.
As the saying goes, all models are wrong. Some are just useful.
Russian rocket designs were very advanced and yet quite simple @@dimitrijestankovic6199
@@SporadicBenevolenceA very good point about fuel expenditure.
Energy to mass relation is always a blast.
مهندسی هوا فضا سخته؟ من با وجود سیستم آموزشی افتضاح ایران دوست دارم ۲سال دیگه این رشته رو انتخاب کنم و مدرک بگیرم بعد از دریافت مدرک که کارهایی از این رشته رو بهتره انتخاب کنی اگه راهنمایی کنید ممنون میشم🤍
Exceptional and clearly explained.
The measurement of Kr - 81 in air was used to determine the extent of nuclear weapon production years ago.
Morning gents let’s get this knowledge
Good morning, sir 🧠📈
Plz make more such videos that explain physics concepts and how they are applied to daily life. I was amazed when you said that the force required to stop a truck is given by the momentum equation: p = mv. This simple application of the equation is just so beautiful!
amazing video!! can't wait for the angular momentum video
Such an amazing video!Very educative
Sir , u are doing well .i wish u won't stop making these types of fantastic scientific videos ❤.
Danke schoen, Herr Efficient Engineer
I have a very simple request: could you make a short video explaining how differentials and infinitesimals (which don't have a rigorous definition in standard analysis) are intuitively used in physics and engineering? There exists a gap in transition between math courses and physics/engineering courses, and students aren't taught this intuitive usage, but it's everywhere in physics and engineering. Just as an example, slicing up a hoop into infinite small masses dm, in order to take an integral to calculate inertia.
Yes definitely planning on covering something similar to this next year! Good to know there is interest.
@@TheEfficientEngineer Awesome, looking forward to it! Cheers :)
🤯 شما خودت چگونه به این درک از فیزیک و ریاضی رسیدی؟ لطفا تجربه ای که داری رو برام توضیح بده که من هم استفاده کنم، درود از ایران🇮🇷
@user-ds4iz7qf6tLeibnizian Calculus is very expedient, but not taught. Many mathematicians are bashing it without knowing it enough.
@user-ds4iz7qf6t If this question was directed at me, I am a mechanical engineer (finished university a year ago) so I have had a fair share of physics courses, where calculus has been used in ways I haven’t been taught in the math class. Just as a basic example, math teaches us that when we have a derivative dy/dx for example, that it is not a ratio, and cannot be thought of as such. The precise definition is that a derivative is a *limit* of a ratio delta x / delta y when delta y approaches 0. Yet I would see d theta for a small angle, dm for a small mass, dq for a small charge and so on everywhere used on their own. Then it became clear to me that either the math definitions aren’t correct (they are), or that there must be some way in which physicists and engineers use those differentials differently. Mathematicians will say that physicists and engineers abuse this notation, or that they use infinitesimals, which is a non-standard, albeit very intuitive way of doing calculations. The sad thing is that no one explains this intuitive usage, you just have to accept it. The problem is that this abuse of infinitesimal notation will work just fine with regular derivatives (dy/dx = 4x => dy =4xdx - this is not allowed in math, but is very common in physics), but it won’t work with second or higher derivatives (d^2y/dx^2 = 4x => d^2y = 4xdx^2 - this is completely false).
Finally... waiting for so long...
Love this channel
Would love a video on mechanisms.
Great topic, thanks 👍
Very nice explanation and graphics
This will be one of the most important videos on this channel( remark my comment) , thank you for these awesome high quality videos
He is back!
Without this video I would never know that momentum has buried so much stuff in itself ❤ you done a very fine pice of wisdom
Exactly a video that we want.❤
I saw your vid on my algorithm after TWO WEEKS despite me loving this kind of video. TH-cam needs to fix their algorithm!
Ill just go ahead and thumbs up right away. Every efficient engineer video is insanely good. 🤷
Good idea doing some simpler topics. I'm sure this will help high schoolers get interested in your channel!
Great as usual!
Free Palestine 🇵🇸✌🏻
@@tareknour3986 full support to Israel ❤️❤️❤️🇮🇳🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱
@@ifyouknowmeyoudontknowme free Palestine 🇵🇸 ❤️
@@tareknour3986 feel bad for you
@@ifyouknowmeyoudontknowme me too, i feel bad for you
awesome video as always!
You are the man
amazing video once again
This is excellent video. What did you use to create video
Angular momentum ❤❤
❤❤
PLEASE PLEASE do a video on thermocouples and pressure transducers
Woah great video
Please do a video on RF, S-parameters and stuff
Thank you very much!
Got to stop studying for my 5 MAE test to watch a new Efficient Engineer Video.
Thanks you for that!
9:05 *the velocity's are measured along the line of impact. I think it's important to know that
Thank you
We want an episode on compressed fluid mechanics. (Gaz dynamics)
Great animation
Please upload more videos and concepts
This channels great!
Please make a video on basic vector calculus used in Fluid Mechanics...
I hope we see more Dynamics videos!
Omg you are alive
Welcome Back
yo 'new' video popped up! this channel is awesome but I want 1000 more. lets gooo! 😆
I HAVE A PHYSICS EXAM IN TWO DAYS, WISH ME LUCK!!!🙏💀
Awesome!
Please do something deep on electricity and magnetism 🤌
make a video on relativistic momentum and energy
Plz cover more topics in mechanics
If only I'd had a teacher like u
Which software you use for make this type of video?
What about momentum in quantum particles??
What about momentum in fluid mechanics
Your video was very produced. How did you do this? Used canva?
ofcourse canva is a trash, he must have used manim
i would love to see a video like this but for enthropy
But why is momentum conserved? Why not kinetic energy for example.
At 6:23 why isn’t 1/2 mv^2 the same for both pieces for example?
Wait at
2:40 you said gravity is canceled by normal force on the road , equal and opposite force but the equal and opposite forces has to be of the same type , so wouldn’t the gravitional force by the CAR would cancel it out ?? I am confused and if i am wrong pls correct me
So u mean gravity should be not cancelled here ?!
@ it should be but by something else i think
How do you make your animations?
Is there any way to predict the coefficient of restitution for a particular collision, if you have data from previous "ball hits rigid wall" collision tests?
6:22 v2 is wrong, isn't it? It's not a v either. You are showing speeds and naming them vectors (or worse, velocities?). You need -25 to make that add up to zero. If you don't mean -25, there where do you imply one of the velocities being a negation of the other?
For the explosion example I used vectors when developing the equation for v_2, but at the very end I showed the result as a speed because I thought it made more sense to present the result that way (note that I removed the vector arrow from above the v when I did this).
Angular momentum please!
Would a elastic collision cause sound? Also ty for the video
Nope, for a perfectly elastic collision , energy is conserved (because the inbound and outbound velocities are equal - so kinetic energy is the same before and after the collision). This means that no sound, heat, or light energy is transferred to the surroundings. Such collisions never occur in real life, though.
A video of projectile motion ?
Which font you use for your videos ?
Finally after 6 months...
wow, excellent video with excellent video editing.
I am a student.Would you please help me that where to go for such video editing ( animation)?,I am just making a 3 min video to summarize my overall concepts in visuals please show me the way at least some lower levels that will be enough to present my showcase.i am very very confused
another banger
We eating good tonight
So when you use momentum, do you mean force? Which is also defined by mass * velocity.
Force is: F=m*a
Force is defined by mass * acceleration ! The derivative of the momentum is a force ig
How does this video only got 40k views??
Why isn’t it p1j for the car example
i have an exam tomorrow i hope this helps with it (i have to watch)
Nice
❤❤Love it......Physics Lovers here 👇
Just in time for my exam tomorrow
Kerosene should be the official background music for this video
My man covered half of dynamics in 20 minutes
Try to do problems you'll tell me😢
well, after this, making the video about einstein’s relativity theory would be perfect.
♥️♥️♥️
when I didn't do physics yet I always got confused by Momentum and energy
"Could you make a video about the shaping of sheet metal?"
One momentum ago I didn’t know this
But momentum is imaginary and content h/2π as a unit
Why would it not be better for engineers to make cars so that collisions are more elastic