@@tundeshofowoke6943 I haven't seen him beat anyone, he is too light and fast for that category and just jumps around like a rabbit. Everyone has beaten him up to now and he got away with it because he can take hits like no one. Fury's uppercut would have knocked the horse down.
@@RoddyTalksSports Sky, DAZN or TNT: which broadcast did you watch? TNT was crazy biased to Fury just based on screenshots I saw on how they scored it DAZN mostly neutral besides having AJ who has a financial interest in a Fury win as the unoffical scorecard guy (him vs Fury as a title fight would make a lot more money) Didn't see the Sky broadcast
Bro he got outlanded in 10/12 rounds in both fights. If anyone got robbed it was Usyk. Just stop. Please just stop. You guys only make yourselves look bad.
I thought it would be a split decision that could have gone either way. The first fight was a split win for Usyk but should have been UD win for Usyk. I don’t see how this fight is scored a UD.
By saying you expected a split decision, you’re saying you expected 1 judge to see the winner differently from the other 2 judges. I don’t understand how that can be expected
@@Aggyoko a lot of the casuals seem to believe that, in close fights, the judges conspire on the scores to have 2 to 1 results. I see ppl say this all the time: "iT sHoULd'Ve bEeN a sPLiT dEciSiOn." They do not understand how fights are scored. "iT LoOkEd LiKe aN SD tO mE, dErP DeRp"
First of all, great analysys, you justified pretty extensively your scorecard. New sub for sure. I find incredible how people are defending the official scorecards. Unjustifiable. I had Fury winning 7 - 5. I could also see 7 - 5 Usyk but much more debatable. My scorecard: Fury 2 3 4 5 9 10 12. Usyk 1 6 7 8 11. 12 could a 10 10. 1 could be a 10 10. Unanimous 116 112 is a shame. Also commentary was so biased. Fury in the first half was incredible with blocking head shots from Usyk. Commentator and I also think judges did not see that. Truly a shame. To me it was very clear that Fury was the close but clear winner. Clearly these two champions, these two greats, needed a third fight to settle. Also, what do you think about doby language before the score? Usyk and his team looked defeated, and surprised. Expecially because when Buffer declared 116 112 for two and 115 113 seemed only realistic for Fury. Very good attitude btw. I like a person that truly.love boxing and can respect both fighters.
Comical. Usyk was a clear winner again and he was the one who was blocking most shots upstairs and who was landing clean when he threw. There's no way in hell Fury won I guess you must've missed Fury wearing his trunks almost nipple high in order to reduce the target for Usyk to aim at and given the obscene advantages in reach, height and weight he holds over Usyk and how difficult it is to close the distance and land upstairs it is for the much smaller man it is vs a literal giant, especially one who knows how to use that range and size to keep you at bay, the body was always going to be the easiest target for Usyk to land on there was a much smaller target for Usyk to aim at than there was for Fury despite him being twice Usyk's size Did you miss all the stiff arming from orangutan arms Fury too? Again that's illegal and makes it very difficult for the much smaller and shorter armed fighter to get into range and land
You British are truly delusional. Next time when you try to score a fight, remove your bias and emotion, and if you still see the same result, visit a doctor. And when you visit a doctor and still see the same result, go over the Boxing rules and how a fight is scored.
Good for you that you subscribed to this channel ... Maybe you can go watch tennis together , because both of you have no clue what you are talking about when it it comes to boxing !!
Moronic take. You don't understand the 10 point must system and/or you suck at math.
I’ll have to watch it again but I scored
1:Fury (10-9)
2:Usyk (9-10)
3:Fury (10-9)
4:Usyk (9-10)
5:Fury (10-9)
6:Usyk (9-10)
7:Usyk (9-10)
8:Usyk (9-10)
9:Fury (10-9)
10:Usyk (9-10)
11:Usyk (9-10
12:Fury (10-9)
Fury: 113
Usyk: 115
Fury got beat by the rabbit 💯
Watch the whole match and then comment because you clearly didn't watch or you only see what you want to see.
@MrKruki your man Fury, got beat by the better man. Usyk came to England to beat all the big boys loool
@@tundeshofowoke6943 I haven't seen him beat anyone, he is too light and fast for that category and just jumps around like a rabbit. Everyone has beaten him up to now and he got away with it because he can take hits like no one. Fury's uppercut would have knocked the horse down.
Lol😂he clearly lost that figh😂
Fury was embarrassing, it’s insane some people have such a pro English bias they expect to win everything … #itscominghome
Where is the video?????? we're you eating while doing this???
The UK propaganda got to you, these commentators were biased af and influenced your judgement
@@twal-wo6yh if anything they said Usyk was winning and leading on their card
@@RoddyTalksSports Sky, DAZN or TNT: which broadcast did you watch?
TNT was crazy biased to Fury just based on screenshots I saw on how they scored it
DAZN mostly neutral besides having AJ who has a financial interest in a Fury win as the unoffical scorecard guy (him vs Fury as a title fight would make a lot more money)
Didn't see the Sky broadcast
@@twal-wo6yh hit the streams but the broadcast was Dazn
Short version .... he lost 😅
Fury is the older brother who can't beat his little brother. Not even white cheating.
I thought Usyk should have won if you give it to anyone
Bro he got outlanded in 10/12 rounds in both fights. If anyone got robbed it was Usyk. Just stop. Please just stop. You guys only make yourselves look bad.
Go follow tennis ... Because you have no clue what you are watching when it comes to boxing !!
I thought it would be a split decision that could have gone either way. The first fight was a split win for Usyk but should have been UD win for Usyk. I don’t see how this fight is scored a UD.
Well just the fact that all judges felt Usyk won
By saying you expected a split decision, you’re saying you expected 1 judge to see the winner differently from the other 2 judges. I don’t understand how that can be expected
@@Aggyoko a lot of the casuals seem to believe that, in close fights, the judges conspire on the scores to have 2 to 1 results. I see ppl say this all the time: "iT sHoULd'Ve bEeN a sPLiT dEciSiOn." They do not understand how fights are scored. "iT LoOkEd LiKe aN SD tO mE, dErP DeRp"
@ I’m sorry, but I’m not the guy that said that
@@fatrobdouble you sound upset at my opinion bud. Sorry you’re mad at what I typed lol. Maybe get off the internet for a bit.
Usyk lost to Dubois 😂😂😂 but acting like he got hit below the belt 🤣 now this 😂😂 should at least be a draw
First of all, great analysys, you justified pretty extensively your scorecard. New sub for sure. I find incredible how people are defending the official scorecards. Unjustifiable. I had Fury winning 7 - 5. I could also see 7 - 5 Usyk but much more debatable. My scorecard: Fury 2 3 4 5 9 10 12. Usyk 1 6 7 8 11. 12 could a 10 10. 1 could be a 10 10. Unanimous 116 112 is a shame. Also commentary was so biased. Fury in the first half was incredible with blocking head shots from Usyk. Commentator and I also think judges did not see that. Truly a shame. To me it was very clear that Fury was the close but clear winner. Clearly these two champions, these two greats, needed a third fight to settle. Also, what do you think about doby language before the score? Usyk and his team looked defeated, and surprised. Expecially because when Buffer declared 116 112 for two and 115 113 seemed only realistic for Fury. Very good attitude btw. I like a person that truly.love boxing and can respect both fighters.
Comical. Usyk was a clear winner again and he was the one who was blocking most shots upstairs and who was landing clean when he threw. There's no way in hell Fury won
I guess you must've missed Fury wearing his trunks almost nipple high in order to reduce the target for Usyk to aim at and given the obscene advantages in reach, height and weight he holds over Usyk and how difficult it is to close the distance and land upstairs it is for the much smaller man it is vs a literal giant, especially one who knows how to use that range and size to keep you at bay, the body was always going to be the easiest target for Usyk to land on there was a much smaller target for Usyk to aim at than there was for Fury despite him being twice Usyk's size
Did you miss all the stiff arming from orangutan arms Fury too? Again that's illegal and makes it very difficult for the much smaller and shorter armed fighter to get into range and land
You British are truly delusional. Next time when you try to score a fight, remove your bias and emotion, and if you still see the same result, visit a doctor. And when you visit a doctor and still see the same result, go over the Boxing rules and how a fight is scored.
Good for you that you subscribed to this channel ... Maybe you can go watch tennis together , because both of you have no clue what you are talking about when it it comes to boxing !!