@@JEP-rc3bj Re "maintenance friendly" A failure to produce maintenance friendly aircraft comes at a cost at every level, poor sales, poor resale value, early retirement. This is a very very important parameter for all high-cost industries... Thank you for posting.
@@JEP-rc3bj Hi Jeb' Ref' "Saab 340", if any aircraft manufacturers products develop a name for extreme difficulty or cost in maintenance: they're pretty much out of the game. No one can afford to buy a maintenance nightmare., Thank you very much for your comment.....
925 A350-900 and A350-1000 have been ordered, 522 have been already delivered... 350 777X have been ordered, some since 2013 (Lufhansa, Etihad, Catay Pacific), none has been delivered at this time. No further comments.
I worked on this airplane. Good summary and this will be an amazing aircraft. Two observations Picture of the “CEO” is Dennis Muilenburg who was the CEO 2015-2019 the current CEO is David Calhoun. Noticed in the video when reviewing the 747 and 777 looks like a clip of an A380.
@@01lelandMCAS is a symptom of Boeing corporate culture and it will take a long time for trust to recover. Also, if customers have committed to a competitor it take more than one category of airliner to turn them back over.
@@01lelanddoesn’t matter there was still an uncommanded pitch down event on the 777x during one of its flight test.. the same shitty software oversight with its flight controls systems exist here. Do some actual research.
If its Boeing I ain't going. Anything new from Boeing anyways, don't know how they were able to destroy the safety culture of Boeing. Remember they were in competition with Space X for the next space capsule, yeah theirs still doesn't work.
The a350 will do it with passenger counts similar to an a321 or 737. Very specific need there, hence limited order need. I believe the Singapore version of the ULR, which you are referencing, holds 161…. Smart money will be in the 8 to 15 hour operating time. 1000x more need there.
Well, since a 777-200LR flew 11,664 nautical miles(21,602 km or 13,422 miles), setting the world record for an airliner, theres no reason why it couldn't make that flight.
The 777X will dominate a market that is becoming a niche market. and "most efficient" is something I highly doubt, the A350 comes down to 2,1 litres per passenger and 100 kilometers, no 777 on earth will ever be able to beat that with its aluminum fuselage. The A350-1000 is capable of carrying 400 passengers in the three-class-cabin-layout, the 777X can carry 440 in a comparable layout. The 777X is a plane for a niche market.
Absolutely, I think both the A350-1000 and the up-and-coming 777-9 are becoming niche aircrafts. Conditions are different now. When the 777-300er just started it was the only twin engined aircraft that can fly for 15 hours nonstop. Now, Airlines around the world can choose either 787-9 or A350-900......
@@davidtjahjadi5079 I agree. the larger versions of the A350 or B787 are more fuel efficient than the B777X, the only reason to order a 777 for an airline would be the need for a passenger capacity of above 400 seats, no matter what the fuel consumption would be.
The only thing that really matters is the bottom line? This is exactly the sort of competition that has got the aviation industry this far in a century....... I'm British but I hope Boeing aircraft Corporation make a profit from their courage with this design :)
This is a huge defect in US corporations because in many countries, their corporations are looking many years into the future while we cut short term costs at the expense of long term health to raise profitability, so that the current CEO can get his big payout.
@@scott4825 Hi Scott., Thank you for that important pointer: namely the CEO getting a large payout. I didn't realise the executive payout distorted the bigger picture within the United States corporate world to the degree you suggest, from a distance: the United States looks too much like a mediaeval or late mediaeval society, tragically polarised between two few having too much and too many having too little, I think many in this world are hoping this distortion resolves without conflict. Best wishes Scott. John Perth Australia
It becomes heavily focused on short term stock value with a lot of their compensation in the form of stock options. So if I've got a massive stock option at year 3, the goal is to have the stock peak at years 3-5, get your 50 million and leave.
@@scott4825 Re "It becomes heavily focused on short term stock value" I think we have the beginnings of this approach to executive renumeration in Australia; it's not getting much publicity and by and large the public are unaware of it. An extremely valuable insight, thank you Scott. :)
All new cutting edge technology has bugs/glitches that need to be weaned out. Since the 777x is basically a computer in the sky then I hope it’s equipped with EICAS which is an independent and separate computer system that checks the flight computer system for anything. I’m also wondering if pilots need retraining as the 777x will be the longest fuselage wide body airplane thus the chances of tail strikes is very high. Overall it looks nice and looks like it handles nice.
Some of the stats were for the 8x. The 8x delivery date is even further away from the in service date of the 9x. Boeing must be very happy with this outstanding commercial.
BOEING CEO: “This Plane Will DESTROY Our Competitors!” What are they going to do? Are they going to make sure when they crash, they crash into their competitors?
Gee....after the first minute I was looking for the SKIP AD button but couldn't find it. Then I realised that this is actually the clip....goodness me!
I’m a Boeing fan, but have been sorely disappointed of late. Two crashes of brand new versions of the iconic 737? Delayed release and new assembly lines of the 787? Hope this plane does awesome for the airline and their passengers
I think Boeing have got a very capable competitor in airbus. I think they’re focused on delivering high-quality product and are concerned less about their competitors.
Who writes these scripts? First line - this is a fucking big plane, and at that size it does not have competitors, but a competitor in production, namely the Airbus A350, which is a modern widebody jet built to current market demands for range, capacity, fuel efficiency and environmental performance, and will not doubt be modified and updated as technology improves. It's been welcomed by operators and passengers alike, and for those airlines that favour Airbus, or already have the A350 in service, the 777x is unlikely to make them change their fleet composition. So Boeing is not going to destroy Airbus with this aircraft, even once the actually manage to get it certified, and deliver one, several years later than promised, to their first disgruntled and impatient customer. Even then Boeing's roster of commercial jets will looks rather thin, with the ancient and somewhat tarnished 737 max being their only single aisle narrow body for short and medium hall routes, and then a rather conspicuous gap before the jump in size to the 787. There are only so many operators who need something as big as the 777x, so it's not going to do much to restore parity to Boeing's market share which is currently at an historic low, although seeing it in the air may give them one less thing to be embarrassed about. I'm sure it'll be very good, but yelling that it's a fucking miracle is not a magic wand.
It sounds great... I'm sure Airbus would be quaking in their wake if Boeing had got it to market in 2020... But it's 2023 and the project has been beset with problems. The new engines have failed multiple tests, the cabin doors pop off mid flight during one test and a host of other issues have appeared. Boeing need to go back to building great solid aircrafts.
The doors didn't pop off mid flight....the fuesalage failed within 1% of what engineers said it would during the ultimate load test(ground based test)..that failure occurred near the door. They made it stronger....it will easily surpass the ultimate load test now. Its stronger than its required to be.... Go ask Airbus why Boeing DOMINATES the freighter market. Cause they make the superior. Wings too.
I'm a Seattlite. I am in the aviation business. Boeing is a big company with a storied past, but I am disappointed on how it handled the MAX issue and accidents. Shameful.
The only point I dissagree is 6:16. That's what I like about Boeing's older airliners, they had windows lower down, compared to the Airbus windows. Being stuck in the middle seat of a Boeing was not so bad, when compared to the Airbus, you could still see through the windows.
Beyond Facts indeed. About as credible as a North Korean PR firm. Do all passengers get golden Muilenburg parachutes in case it's built like the last bunch of planes?
Love the image at 6:40. Hard to believe that is actually how big the engines are. The huge cowlings are more for the big turbofans to operate within instead. To think those engines look as big as their predecesdors, the CF6 engines. And yet those new engines make in excess of 100,000 horsepower each. Wow.
Remember the 777x has carbon fiber wings and even though it’s larger than the 777-300ER, it is lighter so each engine putting out 110,000 pounds of thrust will be more fuel efficient than the 777-300ER. I flew the 777 for American 🇺🇸 and this new Boeing jet will be awesome!!!
@@gordydexter2615 I work with -200 & -300 variants in my airport job and Im always in awe of how big they are. Specially when I'm under a -300 I imagine how the 9x looks like. Can't wait to see one in person.
The limiting factor on a plane is weight, not volume. There is absolutely no reason to cram people into a plane like sardines. Look at the Super Guppy. They can make a plane with tons of volume so each person could have a bed!! This all comes down to airlines wanting to squeeze every single penny out of the customer they can.
Looking forward to this beauty!! This will be the ultimate airplane for long-haul operations. The 777-9X is simply going to be an amazing airplane. I see it doing really well with the expected performance that it's going to incorporate. The testing for the huge GE-9X turbofans that Boeing recently conducted, has finally been completed, and then given the go-ahead. Though the COVID-19 after affects, has severely grounded this airplane's flight testing, I am certainly glad that soon, they can give it the go-ahead for delivery to the first customer who of course is none other then, Lufthansa. The freighter version will also be an idealistic selection for freight operations, and Qatar has already placed orders for them. I also probably see UPS, and FEDEX make waves with potential orders for the 777-8XF. It will be very exciting to see this brand new advancement in technology, finally get into service.
My question is are th pilots going to be able to still control the in the event of either one or both of wing tips detaching or unlock from in-flight position
Yes, these jets are very efficient. However, I just returned from Europe and I took the 787 900 outbound and inbound. 11 hours in a plane that unless you are paying 6500.00 to sit in a first class pod. Never again. I will look for flights that offer service with Airbus. Airbus is concerned about carbon footprint bur also has not forgotten the group that pays the bills, yes their customers. Seat comfort and leg room in economy. Paying 1650.00 for a round trip x 268 passengers = just under 450,000 dollars. That should be enough to provide us the customer. ......comfort
The Boeing CEOs time would be better spent on rebuilding Boeing’s shattered reputation and improving its engineering rather than bashing Airbus. Boeing has had almost a decade of self-inflicted wounds If they concentrated more on stopping the self-inflicted wounds and less on bashing unions and AIRBUS, becoming respected again would come by itself
I’ve been watching Boeing 777-8 and -9 being flown on test flights out of Boeing field in Seattle for some time now. The long wait is incomprehensible. This posting will certainly curry favor with the manufacturer. I’m overwhelmed the plane has a flight control system and door slides !
No has always made the most sunning looking airplanes in the world. The almost timeless appearance of the 747 800 blows away the look of th A380. Boings whole line up has always looked sleeker than anybody else.
Hate this tempting fate. In March 1988 I was at Airbus as part of a media group. In one of the media conferences there was a boast. "No paying passengers have ever died in an Airbus." There was another boast: "The A320 fly-by-wire technology is foolproof". Three months later both those claims were proved wrong. Subsequently there would be many more deaths in Airbuses, several due to "foolproof" technology is the hands of fools. Boeing should focus on sorting out its quality control problems and delivering a plane that meets its promises. We would all be better off.
Boeing was a company of engineers and has become a company of accountants. If it's really so great, and truly the best, why don't they call it the 777 max? Oh ....maybe I know. But really great features: It's wide, it's long, it has bigger windows and GE engines! Wow!
777X - as the only airplane on display - did not get even one single order at the Paris air show while Airbus sold more than 600 planes. Commercials are great but sales rules. Anyway, regardless of plane its all sardine boxes today.
It’s been my experience that competition is good for business. If this was not the case we’d still be flying 747’s, not that there is anything wrong with that.
Maybe in 10 years Comac will be more consistent but for the moment, there is only one competitor. Actually Airbus is beating Boeing, because Airbus didn't try to cut a penny off every bolt of their planes to please shareholders. I recently paid 30 bucks extra for a trip to NOT be in a MAX. We don't all have short memories.
The only way that Boeing is going to destroy it's competitors is by flying higher, then have the MCAS go off, forcing a nosedive, plummetting both to the ground 😂
It’s called 777 because of the 7 years, 7 months, and 7 days, anyone sensible enough will wait to step in one of those after entering commercial service
Being an airline employee (a flight dispatcher) and an ETOPS SME at a major US airline, I lost any respect I had for Boeing after the MCAS Debacle. Unless this a cleansheet airplane (and its not), its just more of the same. Not saying Airbus is perfect, but, no. I hope my airline stays far away from this POS
Don’t worry about the competitors,concentrate on building a good quality safe aircraft and the customers will come.
In recent years, just 2 units per month have been shipped. And no one wants to buy the 777-8. It is too heavy.
@@JEP-rc3bj Re "maintenance friendly" A failure to produce maintenance friendly aircraft comes at a cost at every level, poor sales, poor resale value, early retirement. This is a very very important parameter for all high-cost industries... Thank you for posting.
@@JEP-rc3bj Hi Jeb' Ref' "Saab 340", if any aircraft manufacturers products develop a name for extreme difficulty or cost in maintenance: they're pretty much out of the game. No one can afford to buy a maintenance nightmare., Thank you very much for your comment.....
That's Airbus speak..
That was a helluva commercial. I hope Boeing paid a lot for it.
BAWHAHA 😂
I agree
He gets $2 Everytime he says seven.
You know that Baby!
😂
Airbus just announced the biggest single order in aviation history at the Paris Air show. 😂
Amazing what orders guaranteed Euro subsidies will bring.
Facts.
925 A350-900 and A350-1000 have been ordered, 522 have been already delivered... 350 777X have been ordered, some since 2013 (Lufhansa, Etihad, Catay Pacific), none has been delivered at this time. No further comments.
75% of cellphone users are Android users. 25% iPhone users. Does not mean Android is better. Stop being an Android user and upgrade grade 😂
Airbus is jus the best . The only Boeing I love is the Dreamliner
My dad is actually an engineer! He makes jet engines and he even worked on the very first prototype of the 777x!
💪💪💪
His mother must be very proud of him !
Awesome, the GE 9X is an amazing engine
Fact is, sitting in a cramped uncomfortable seat for 14 hours with even more people squeezed in is NOT an exciting passenger experience.
A380 all the way!
tell that to the industry
@@nickolliver3021 I just did.
@@212MPH did you
You're right, that's why if I can I upgrade to at least business or if it's local (North America) drive or ride my motorcycle.
Boeing’s way of seeing things: “This plane will destroy our competitors!!!”
Reality: “This plane has destroyed its own manufacturer.”
Since they moved to Chicago😮
Real reality: "This plane will destroy itself"
@@1huehue Not in Chicago anymore Arlington, Virginia is the new headquarters
@@mikeske9777where they forget tools inside the plane body during assembling...😂
I worked on this airplane. Good summary and this will be an amazing aircraft. Two observations Picture of the “CEO” is Dennis Muilenburg who was the CEO 2015-2019 the current CEO is David Calhoun. Noticed in the video when reviewing the 747 and 777 looks like a clip of an A380.
Has this channel been under a rock for the last 5 years?
A380s are the most comfortable planes made today.
I hope it is not going to destroy the competition by crashing on their HQ due to deliberately faulty software.
After the MCAS debacle, I'm not sure it will be the "competitors" that get "destroyed".
MCAS has been corrected and is not a system on the 777-8/-9.
@@01lelandMCAS is a symptom of Boeing corporate culture and it will take a long time for trust to recover. Also, if customers have committed to a competitor it take more than one category of airliner to turn them back over.
Heh my thoughts exactly. I know it's not the same department but their Starliner is on the edge of cancellation, which don't inspire confidence.
@@01lelanddoesn’t matter there was still an uncommanded pitch down event on the 777x during one of its flight test.. the same shitty software oversight with its flight controls systems exist here. Do some actual research.
If its Boeing I ain't going. Anything new from Boeing anyways, don't know how they were able to destroy the safety culture of Boeing. Remember they were in competition with Space X for the next space capsule, yeah theirs still doesn't work.
Too bad A350 beat them first. The fact not even 777x can do nonstop Sydney to New York that Qantas A350 will do easily
The a350 will do it with passenger counts similar to an a321 or 737. Very specific need there, hence limited order need. I believe the Singapore version of the ULR, which you are referencing, holds 161…. Smart money will be in the 8 to 15 hour operating time. 1000x more need there.
Well, since a 777-200LR flew 11,664 nautical miles(21,602 km or 13,422 miles), setting the world record for an airliner, theres no reason why it couldn't make that flight.
@@dundonrl If a 777-200LR could fly Sydney - New York efficiently, Qantas would've bought them.
Hope that it will be enough comfortable. Because Boeing used to be less comfortable than Airbus. It’s a fact.
Quality is often worth waiting for, IMO.
Don’t you just hate it when people call the 777 (triple-seven) the “seven seven seven”?
No
@@HanginOutWithStan ok just my opinion
I do too 😅
Sounds a bit awkward but that's what it is.
@@cellpat2686 yeah ur right
The 777X will dominate a market that is becoming a niche market. and "most efficient" is something I highly doubt, the A350 comes down to 2,1 litres per passenger and 100 kilometers, no 777 on earth will ever be able to beat that with its aluminum fuselage. The A350-1000 is capable of carrying 400 passengers in the three-class-cabin-layout, the 777X can carry 440 in a comparable layout. The 777X is a plane for a niche market.
Absolutely, I think both the A350-1000 and the up-and-coming 777-9 are becoming niche aircrafts. Conditions are different now. When the 777-300er just started it was the only twin engined aircraft that can fly for 15 hours nonstop. Now, Airlines around the world can choose either 787-9 or A350-900......
@@davidtjahjadi5079 I agree. the larger versions of the A350 or B787 are more fuel efficient than the B777X, the only reason to order a 777 for an airline would be the need for a passenger capacity of above 400 seats, no matter what the fuel consumption would be.
The only thing that really matters is the bottom line? This is exactly the sort of competition that has got the aviation industry this far in a century....... I'm British but I hope Boeing aircraft Corporation make a profit from their courage with this design :)
This is a huge defect in US corporations because in many countries, their corporations are looking many years into the future while we cut short term costs at the expense of long term health to raise profitability, so that the current CEO can get his big payout.
@@scott4825 Hi Scott., Thank you for that important pointer: namely the CEO getting a large payout. I didn't realise the executive payout distorted the bigger picture within the United States corporate world to the degree you suggest, from a distance: the United States looks too much like a mediaeval or late mediaeval society, tragically polarised between two few having too much and too many having too little, I think many in this world are hoping this distortion resolves without conflict. Best wishes Scott. John Perth Australia
It becomes heavily focused on short term stock value with a lot of their compensation in the form of stock options. So if I've got a massive stock option at year 3, the goal is to have the stock peak at years 3-5, get your 50 million and leave.
@@scott4825 Re "It becomes heavily focused on short term stock value" I think we have the beginnings of this approach to executive renumeration in Australia; it's not getting much publicity and by and large the public are unaware of it. An extremely valuable insight, thank you Scott. :)
All new cutting edge technology has bugs/glitches that need to be weaned out. Since the 777x is basically a computer in the sky then I hope it’s equipped with EICAS which is an independent and separate computer system that checks the flight computer system for anything. I’m also wondering if pilots need retraining as the 777x will be the longest fuselage wide body airplane thus the chances of tail strikes is very high. Overall it looks nice and looks like it handles nice.
There's a warning sticker infront of a321s and neos so a320 rated pilots wont tailstrike it so it wouldn't need training just a briefing
Some of the stats were for the 8x. The 8x delivery date is even further away from the in service date of the 9x. Boeing must be very happy with this outstanding commercial.
Competition is good,but
The body is not composite, unlike the a350
The a350is more efficient,ask airbus
It's an old design
"Currently, Boeing airplanes lead the industry in passenger comfort." I dunno 'bout all that. 🤔✌️✈️
Exactly 😂
The passengers that nose dived into the ground arent complaining about their seats. Lmao
So this is why it was the only major type of aircraft to not have one order at the Paris Air Show?
BOEING CEO: “This Plane Will DESTROY Our Competitors!” What are they going to do? Are they going to make sure when they crash, they crash into their competitors?
Gee....after the first minute I was looking for the SKIP AD button but couldn't find it. Then I realised that this is actually the clip....goodness me!
Just remember "Boeing CEO," to have it complete when you introduce it to your investors and employees - unlike the last one.
Haha! Great PR by Boeing...left out the fact that the 777-8 hasn't sold a pax version since 2012 😂
Awesome...I love to see my favourite aircraft company going super forward
You're easily pleased.
I’m a Boeing fan, but have been sorely disappointed of late. Two crashes of brand new versions of the iconic 737? Delayed release and new assembly lines of the 787? Hope this plane does awesome for the airline and their passengers
I’m more of an Airbus fan mainly because of the a350. Just my opinion.
Technology has failures.. this is no different which is why the 737max was fixed.
@@XX-166 so true
@@XX-166 It wasn't technological mistake fool. It's involuntary manslaughter due to cost cutting.
I'm all for Airbus!
To this day the only thing Boeing destroyed is many lives in two 737 max 8 crashes
As long as SAFETY is your #1 priority, you'd always crush the comp!
Safety has NEVER been Boeing's number one priority. The bean counters in Chicago seen to that.
This was just a Boeing commercial. I’m sure the A350 would have something to say about the claims made!
I love the 777, but the A350 is awesome as well. I flew on the A350 last year and it was the smoothest flight I've ever been on.
I think Boeing have got a very capable competitor in airbus. I think they’re focused on delivering high-quality product and are concerned less about their competitors.
If Boeing were as secretly subsidized as Airbus has been since day one there would be no competition.
Who writes these scripts? First line - this is a fucking big plane, and at that size it does not have competitors, but a competitor in production, namely the Airbus A350, which is a modern widebody jet built to current market demands for range, capacity, fuel efficiency and environmental performance, and will not doubt be modified and updated as technology improves. It's been welcomed by operators and passengers alike, and for those airlines that favour Airbus, or already have the A350 in service, the 777x is unlikely to make them change their fleet composition. So Boeing is not going to destroy Airbus with this aircraft, even once the actually manage to get it certified, and deliver one, several years later than promised, to their first disgruntled and impatient customer. Even then Boeing's roster of commercial jets will looks rather thin, with the ancient and somewhat tarnished 737 max being their only single aisle narrow body for short and medium hall routes, and then a rather conspicuous gap before the jump in size to the 787. There are only so many operators who need something as big as the 777x, so it's not going to do much to restore parity to Boeing's market share which is currently at an historic low, although seeing it in the air may give them one less thing to be embarrassed about. I'm sure it'll be very good, but yelling that it's a fucking miracle is not a magic wand.
737 max's reputations isn't somewhat tarnished, it's non-existent. I actively avoid flying the max
It sounds great... I'm sure Airbus would be quaking in their wake if Boeing had got it to market in 2020... But it's 2023 and the project has been beset with problems. The new engines have failed multiple tests, the cabin doors pop off mid flight during one test and a host of other issues have appeared. Boeing need to go back to building great solid aircrafts.
The doors didn't pop off mid flight....the fuesalage failed within 1% of what engineers said it would during the ultimate load test(ground based test)..that failure occurred near the door. They made it stronger....it will easily surpass the ultimate load test now. Its stronger than its required to be....
Go ask Airbus why Boeing DOMINATES the freighter market. Cause they make the superior. Wings too.
As a European there is only this to say.. Keep on dreaming although the amerikan dream is all over and has become to a nightmare to the whole World.
I hope Boeing is not trying to outdo competitors and compromise safety
Considering Boeing's current management and board members, I would bet that deliveries will be delayed to after 2025.
Maybe 2030s if lucky.
Nope it will be in service
@@andrewlarson7895 Wanna bet?
I'm a Seattlite. I am in the aviation business. Boeing is a big company with a storied past, but I am disappointed on how it handled the MAX issue and accidents. Shameful.
Only one competitor and they are hardly being destroyed 😂
The only point I dissagree is 6:16. That's what I like about Boeing's older airliners, they had windows lower down, compared to the Airbus windows. Being stuck in the middle seat of a Boeing was not so bad, when compared to the Airbus, you could still see through the windows.
Big deal, there's not much to see at cruising height except a few clouds.
Hope it would not destroy the passengers.
Whenever boeing drifts from their design philosophy it does havoc
May this one shall be an exception
Great Plane
Beyond Facts indeed. About as credible as a North Korean PR firm. Do all passengers get golden Muilenburg parachutes in case it's built like the last bunch of planes?
It’s not the length, it’s the width people love. Less claustrophobic.
Love the image at 6:40. Hard to believe that is actually how big the engines are. The huge cowlings are more for the big turbofans to operate within instead. To think those engines look as big as their predecesdors, the CF6 engines. And yet those new engines make in excess of 100,000 horsepower each. Wow.
One of those can swallow up the whole ground crew!
GE90 115B on the existing 777 300ER puts out 115,000 pounds of thrust.
@@larrydugan1441 Yes. It is an amazing piece.
Remember the 777x has carbon fiber wings and even though it’s larger than the 777-300ER, it is lighter so each engine putting out 110,000 pounds of thrust will be more fuel efficient than the 777-300ER. I flew the 777 for American 🇺🇸 and this new Boeing jet will be awesome!!!
@@gordydexter2615 I work with -200 & -300 variants in my airport job and Im always in awe of how big they are. Specially when I'm under a -300 I imagine how the 9x looks like. Can't wait to see one in person.
How to add extra words to get a 1 min video to 10min video?
Beyond Facts: Hold my beer.
The limiting factor on a plane is weight, not volume. There is absolutely no reason to cram people into a plane like sardines. Look at the Super Guppy. They can make a plane with tons of volume so each person could have a bed!! This all comes down to airlines wanting to squeeze every single penny out of the customer they can.
Im sick of airlines treating customers like they are their for their stock prices to go up and the ceo and execs make millions on our pain
Looking forward to this beauty!! This will be the ultimate airplane for long-haul operations. The 777-9X is simply going to be an amazing airplane. I see it doing really well with the expected performance that it's going to incorporate. The testing for the huge GE-9X turbofans that Boeing recently conducted, has finally been completed, and then given the go-ahead. Though the COVID-19 after affects, has severely grounded this airplane's flight testing, I am certainly glad that soon, they can give it the go-ahead for delivery to the first customer who of course is none other then, Lufthansa. The freighter version will also be an idealistic selection for freight operations, and Qatar has already placed orders for them. I also probably see UPS, and FEDEX make waves with potential orders for the 777-8XF. It will be very exciting to see this brand new advancement in technology, finally get into service.
What would be amazing if there was actually competition still in America instead of monopolies.
Love the A380 more.
@@ilovesuisse1 You can have it!!
Not interesting. Soon they will be obsolete.
This aircraft is spectacular.
That is if it even gets released before its tech gets old
Most Efficient twin engine??? I'm sure Airbus with their A350 that's way ahead of 777x are having a good laugh.
If anyone knows about destroying a commercial airplane manufacturer it’s Boeing’s CEO.
LoL the enthusiasm and excitement of the guy talking 😅
My question is are th pilots going to be able to still control the in the event of either one or both of wing tips detaching or unlock from in-flight position
I bet Boeing developed systems where the pilot will still control the plane if the fold wings magnification
Yes. But it's also built into the requirements that it still must be able to fly and land if the wing tips get locked in either position.
Yes, these jets are very efficient. However, I just returned from Europe and I took the 787 900 outbound and inbound. 11 hours in a plane that unless you are paying 6500.00 to sit in a first class pod. Never again. I will look for flights that offer service with Airbus. Airbus is concerned about carbon footprint bur also has not forgotten the group that pays the bills, yes their customers. Seat comfort and leg room in economy. Paying 1650.00 for a round trip x 268 passengers = just under 450,000 dollars. That should be enough to provide us the customer. ......comfort
The Boeing CEOs time would be better spent on rebuilding Boeing’s shattered reputation and improving its engineering rather than bashing Airbus. Boeing has had almost a decade of self-inflicted wounds If they concentrated more on stopping the self-inflicted wounds and less on bashing unions and AIRBUS, becoming respected again would come by itself
Meanwhile the A350 and A330neo are conquering the skies. Just kidding, love Airbus and Boeing
After this Ad i wanna buy one
😁😁😁
Boeing 777 is a very iconic plane.
Just build one that:
Is not a drill!
Does not need oversight from the FAA due to bad quality control (metal parts n cable canals and so on)
Customer: what's so special about this plane?
Boeing: MCAS
The plane is already obsolete
my opinion is that because of those engines, that are the most powerful and also more complex, it will not perform as they predict .
The ad mentions larger windows several times, that will be offset by even smaller seats.
Airbus ain’t got shit on Boeing simply from economy it will put preform airbus
Please stop him from saying 7 7 7 😢
😥😥😥
Only a double decker Boeing aircraft can compete with the luxury of A 380...
Bro really said "boing is at the top of the aviation industry" as if boing isnt struggling to compete with airbus
I’ve been watching Boeing 777-8 and -9 being flown on test flights out of Boeing field in Seattle for some time now. The long wait is incomprehensible. This posting will certainly curry favor with the manufacturer. I’m overwhelmed the plane has a flight control system and door slides !
I'm just wanted to tell you that u only watched the 777-9 flying. The 8 version didn't make it's maiden flight or being built yet.
You mean you look forward to using the door slides in every flight of yours? LOL
I’m sure Airbus will soon copy that folding winglets too😂
Airbus will copy from Boeing and their fans will think they’re better🤧
Yeah, that a350 copied from 787 and now they said Airbus are the origin😊
Boeing: we updated the Mcrash, errr, the Mcas system
No has always made the most sunning looking airplanes in the world. The almost timeless appearance of the 747 800 blows away the look of th A380. Boings whole line up has always looked sleeker than anybody else.
It's "boeing"
I fly 777 & 787 frequently = both awesome airplanes
Hate this tempting fate. In March 1988 I was at Airbus as part of a media group. In one of the media conferences there was a boast. "No paying passengers have ever died in an Airbus." There was another boast: "The A320 fly-by-wire technology is foolproof". Three months later both those claims were proved wrong. Subsequently there would be many more deaths in Airbuses, several due to "foolproof" technology is the hands of fools. Boeing should focus on sorting out its quality control problems and delivering a plane that meets its promises. We would all be better off.
Boeing was a company of engineers and has become a company of accountants. If it's really so great, and truly the best, why don't they call it the 777 max? Oh ....maybe I know. But really great features: It's wide, it's long, it has bigger windows and GE engines! Wow!
Fingers crossed they got this one certified.
777X - as the only airplane on display - did not get even one single order at the Paris air show while Airbus sold more than 600 planes. Commercials are great but sales rules. Anyway, regardless of plane its all sardine boxes today.
Let’s hope it performs better than the MAX which I believe still hasn’t been sorted out,great sales pitch though,time will tell.
737 max is flying everyday....
I already imagine Emirates using this type of airplane 😂
😁😁😁
as a big fan of the triple seven, im exicted!!
If it's a Boeing, then I ain't going.
I hope Boeing have started building planes that don't have swarf in compartments through which wiring looms run anymore. Case in point KC 46.
It’s been my experience that competition is good for business. If this was not the case we’d still be flying 747’s, not that there is anything wrong with that.
What airport is the spotting On the second .45 with the Aeroflot 777 landing ?
The Chinese are developing a commercial aircraft that can carry 5,000 passengers. It can be converted to military use
777x, more minor updates marketed as "excitement". The last real revolution by Boeing was the Sonic Crusier. All other products are simply evolutions.
Did Boeing end up using the new Lithium-Aluminum alloy on the 777X or did it opt to use the same aluminum alloys it uses on the current 777?
Maybe in 10 years Comac will be more consistent but for the moment, there is only one competitor. Actually Airbus is beating Boeing, because Airbus didn't try to cut a penny off every bolt of their planes to please shareholders. I recently paid 30 bucks extra for a trip to NOT be in a MAX. We don't all have short memories.
The only way that Boeing is going to destroy it's competitors is by flying higher, then have the MCAS go off, forcing a nosedive, plummetting both to the ground 😂
Nice shot of RNZAF 757 at 2.53.
Giant of the sky, the Boeing 777X Low running cost and most efficiency engines
Kind of like the su-57. Hope they can ever build one
As long as it doesnt destroy its passengers.
It’s called 777 because of the 7 years, 7 months, and 7 days, anyone sensible enough will wait to step in one of those after entering commercial service
“This Plane Will DESTROY Our Competitors!” Instead of Passengers? Well that's good.
So is this fly by wire joysticks ,like Airbus, ? you showed the cockpit as such ????
Being an airline employee (a flight dispatcher) and an ETOPS SME at a major US airline, I lost any respect I had for Boeing after the MCAS Debacle. Unless this a cleansheet airplane (and its not), its just more of the same. Not saying Airbus is perfect, but, no. I hope my airline stays far away from this POS
FACT: the disgrace CEO with multiple MCAS crashes you put on the Banner is no longer the Boeing CEO.
There is only one competitor Airbus and I don't think they need to destroy Boeing, Wall street will do it.