@@yash110496 are bhai, yeh banda jhoot bol rha hai. ese agyaaniyon ke saath charcha na kare. Iska naam hi Krishn ke upar based hai. Hare Krishn. Radhe Radhe Krishn
@@nijithraju8853 Why do you limit God? If He desires He can appear how ever He wants to. We can be scientific about it and deduce which Personalities in history fit the criteria.. or we can be blindly faithful, which is dismissed by both Vedas and Bible. Jesuses words are also subject to many misstranslations from Aramaic to Greek to Latin. He said many good things tho and is not discredited if you ask me. Jesus is awesome 🙂🙏💚
No, Krishna is described as *Sat-Chit-Anand Vigraha* (eternity, consciousness, and bliss personified) by Lord Brahma during the Brahma-Vimohan Leela, when Brahma saw and prayed to Krishna in Vrindavan. His body is not like our material one-it's not made of flesh, blood, or bones. So, don’t imagine him as an ordinary human. Though he appeared in human-like form, his essence is eternal, blissful, and divine. For example, unlike us, who sweat under heat, Krishna’s body absorbs all heat, cooling the surroundings for his friends. In one of his leelas, he even swallowed an entire forest fire.
When brahma says that to Sri Krishna, he is not referring to Sri krishna's bodily form he is referring that to the consciousness of him which is Sri Hari himself . Krishna died and his mortal body also vanquished in the tides of time , anything eternal can't have death . Only Sri Hari himself is eternal that's why he is called 'achyuta' meaning his form is unchangeable and eternal .
@@buzbee-h6cwrong. Brahma is referring to Lord Krishna's body only. His body is an embodiment of Bliss, Knowledge and Eternity. Lord Krsna was present with all His potencies when He came to this world. Krsna didn't die He just went back to Goloka Vrindavan from where He had come from
@@I_speak_facts_fool Krishna's body was cremated by arjuna. when he arrived at Dwarka he found both Balrama and Krishna 'Dead' . Krishna did have bodily death .
@buzbee-h6c How do you draw the difference between Sri Hari and Sri Krishna? You probably agree with the bhagvatam līlās and harivamṣa purana, part of the vyasa literature. Sri Rama and Sri Krsna are eternally residing in their own spiritual realms, I.e. Sri Saketa Dhama and Sri Goloka Dhama. These realms are surreal and nityā and ṣaṣwata. When in certain puranical notions. Krsna and Rama are described as Avatars of Sri Visnu, also don't misunderstand that Gargarishi in Garga Samhita mentions about Purnaavatar Sri Rama and Paripurnavatar Sri Krishna. Bhagavān doesn't count in mortals, hence their body is not flesh and blood. You cannot swallow the forest fires or lift the massy goverdhanā mountain which perimeters 22 miles as a 6 year old. These are ānshik shaktis of Sri bhagavan which they make use of while visiting Bhuloka.
Somehow hearing that Krishna existed verifies what i have long thought to be true even though I think of myself as Buddhist. Many blessings n thank you so much. ❤❤❤
Come back to the path of God brother. Krishna/Hari is endless and he has endless love for all his devotees. His devotees who follow his teachings out of love get freed from the entanglement of pain and pleasure and reach the highest truth. The highest truth is also Him (parabrahm)
Alexander and Kalidas were human and there are lot of evidence like coins,inscriptions that Alexander exists. But all of them say that Alexander is a human and king who ruled many parts of the world.Same with Kalidas, who was a poet and we have his writings and poems as evidence. They never said they had magical powers or Alexander took many avatars But with krishna, there are many temples and books written about him. He may be a human who lived 7500 years ago. But his magical powers, avatars, sudarshana chakra in his fingers are totally unbelievable
Well in this way, same goes with any God worshipped on earth. The mobile we use to communicate today is totally unbelievable instrument even before 500 years. The dinosaurs skeleton we get today were be a myth if we didn't found them. For universe we are just like a witty virus and even smaller than that. And here we are trying to judge creator of Universe in human body.
@@iaminmilkyway For the universe we are universe ourselves. We are made up of star dusts. Our atoms will always exist regardless of anything. And i dont think so logically questioning "creator of our universe" would be so fragile for God for not to listen, afterall in theory it has created all of universe
viraj? more like siraj... and yeah for your information - if thats what u want to say, then the whole world is disney land.. and u forgot ur brain somewhere.
@@TGRRohitthe doubting of things asking questions about existence is called philosophy, Vedant philosophy is one of the most considerable philosophy which say that there is one supreme Bhram and everyone atma is the ansh of the Bhram. Who is The bhram now? Its Krishna. Krishna as he is portrayed was always not a makhanchor who do rasleela at teenage. He was something different, you need to read Bhagvat Gita to Understand him. Doubt cleared?
God coming in a human form as a Krishna Avatar or in any other form is no big deal for God because God is doing infinity amount of things in the Universe and beyond every micro or even smaller unit in a second. God is the creator and the creation.
roman mythology got doomed years ago no one cares about them anymore but look at sanatan even after 1000yrs of continuous invasion still standing strong
OHM DHAMODHARAYA WITHMAHEE RUKMINI VALLABHAYA DHEEMAHEE THANNOOH KRISHNA PRAJOYDAYAATHE THANNOOH KRISHNA PRAJOYDAYAATHE HARE KRISHNA HARE KRISHNA KRISHNA KRISHNA HARE HARE HARE RAMA HARE RAMA RAMA RAMA HARE HARE OHM WRISHABHANUJAYA WITHMAHEE KRISHNA PRIYAYA DHEEMAHEE THANNOOH RADHAE PRAJOYDAYAATHE THANNOOH RADHAE PRAJOYDAYAATHE
There are at least 14 independent sources that mention Jesus, including the letters of Paul, the writings of Jewish historian Flavius Josephus, and the writings of Roman historian Tacitus.   Contemporary sources Biographers who lived during Jesus' time or shortly after quote from his letters and decrees, and describe his life in detail.  Non-biblical sources In addition to the Bible, there are other non-biblical sources that support Jesus' existence, including the writings of Josephus and Tacitus.   Roman texts Roman governor Pliny the Younger wrote to Emperor Trajan that early Christians would "sing hymns to Christ as to a god".  Historical timeline Jesus is mentioned by Jewish and Roman historians within a few decades of his supposed lifetime.
Lord Jesus Christ, was a real person. We literally have eyewitness testimony, lord Jesus is not only mentioned in the Bible but also the Quran and even in Sanskrit texts of india. What more evidence do you need????
Areh... ramayana likha gya tha abse 2000-3000 saal pehle...uske baad likha gya Mahabharat... Aur inka real me hona koi proof nai hai... Aur inhone Krishna ka proof nai dia bhai....bs yapping kr rahe the ki proof proof
Sit in mediation for now and then even for 5 min for 6 month as a practice . one can have idea of what God Is and at least be a nice human . Irony is people are too busy unable to do so ( forget about to be it )
Are u deaf, he said celestial evidence not archaeological. One more fool misunderstood the Supreme! By propaganda of people that still portrays Krishn as a makhanchor.
Isse pehle log muje boycott karde.....i want to say that mai bhi 1 saal pehle aise saare videos dekhta tha even this guest ki bhi but ab ye itna jadya ho raha hai ki now its unbelievable and unrealistic.....Ranveer is now soo deep into pseudoscience now😑...... can't even expect some logical, rational, discussion on his podcasts......its either god, tantra, celebrities for their film promotions....... tanmay bhat ne sahi kaha tha he's a full time capitalist 😂
NO sir !!! Don't think "Krishna" as a PERSON Because he is another name of "ब्रह्म" Therefore he is eternal, omnipresent, formless, blissful, and cause of all causes (he is ब्रह्म) Krishna is a person only in MAHABHARAT story In reality, he is NOT a person
Blood, Flesh and Bones ??? Seriously?? The Creator of the Universe Brahma (Who's entire body is made of Intelligence) Himself Says in Brahma Samhita 5.1 that - Ishvara Parama Krishna Sad-cid-anand Vigraha Anadir Adir Govinda Sarva Karana Karanam Sad means Eternal, Cid means full of knowledge and Anand means full of Bliss.... His body and conscious itself is one. In BG - 9.11 Krishna Says - "Fools deride Me when I descend in the human form. They do not know My transcendental nature as the Supreme Lord of all that be." Atleast Know before you Speak... Harekrsna
![SAFEPLANET - ดาวเคราะห์ [ THE PLANET ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/4X1XL3I_k3c/mqdefault.jpg)
Only those who has doubts in existence of thier forefathers have doubts about existence if shree krishn ❤🚩🚩
Only religion can make someone this blind
Haanji tera jija hai na Krishna
@@Johan_libert779 don't you question other beliefs?
@@Johan_libert779 don't you question other beliefs?
No we don't@@vamsikumar1550
Hare krishna radhe radhe
Krishna was just a human. Not a god. We godified him.
@@gokulkrishna2667 acha toh vishwaroopam tune dikhaya tha mahabharat main? He was supreme, the purna avatar of mahavishnu
@@yash110496 are bhai, yeh banda jhoot bol rha hai. ese agyaaniyon ke saath charcha na kare. Iska naam hi Krishn ke upar based hai.
Hare Krishn. Radhe Radhe Krishn
@@gokulkrishna2667 Your name itself is based on Lord Krishn. and you say such things of him
@@gokulkrishna2667he was the supreme. He exists in everyone he is Shiva He is Narayana, He is existence he is everything.
He is the ultimate reality!
Not material, but transcendental form. He was youthful even in old age.
Only Jesus is the truth
@@nijithraju8853okay , it's for you that's fine
@@nijithraju8853Jesus is messenger of vasudev ❤🎉
@@nijithraju8853 Why do you limit God? If He desires He can appear how ever He wants to. We can be scientific about it and deduce which Personalities in history fit the criteria.. or we can be blindly faithful, which is dismissed by both Vedas and Bible.
Jesuses words are also subject to many misstranslations from Aramaic to Greek to Latin. He said many good things tho and is not discredited if you ask me. Jesus is awesome 🙂🙏💚
Jai Shree Radhey Krishna
The pronunciation of 1st krishn is perfect❤ Radhey Radhey ❤❤
।।जय जय श्री राधे कृष्ण।।🙏🙏
Hare Krishna❤️Radhe Radhe❤️
No, Krishna is described as *Sat-Chit-Anand Vigraha* (eternity, consciousness, and bliss personified) by Lord Brahma during the Brahma-Vimohan Leela, when Brahma saw and prayed to Krishna in Vrindavan. His body is not like our material one-it's not made of flesh, blood, or bones. So, don’t imagine him as an ordinary human. Though he appeared in human-like form, his essence is eternal, blissful, and divine. For example, unlike us, who sweat under heat, Krishna’s body absorbs all heat, cooling the surroundings for his friends. In one of his leelas, he even swallowed an entire forest fire.
IYKYK 🤷♂️
When brahma says that to Sri Krishna, he is not referring to Sri krishna's bodily form he is referring that to the consciousness of him which is Sri Hari himself . Krishna died and his mortal body also vanquished in the tides of time , anything eternal can't have death . Only Sri Hari himself is eternal that's why he is called 'achyuta' meaning his form is unchangeable and eternal .
@@buzbee-h6cwrong. Brahma is referring to Lord Krishna's body only. His body is an embodiment of Bliss, Knowledge and Eternity. Lord Krsna was present with all His potencies when He came to this world. Krsna didn't die He just went back to Goloka Vrindavan from where He had come from
@@I_speak_facts_fool Krishna's body was cremated by arjuna. when he arrived at Dwarka he found both Balrama and Krishna 'Dead' . Krishna did have bodily death .
@buzbee-h6c How do you draw the difference between Sri Hari and Sri Krishna? You probably agree with the bhagvatam līlās and harivamṣa purana, part of the vyasa literature. Sri Rama and Sri Krsna are eternally residing in their own spiritual realms, I.e. Sri Saketa Dhama and Sri Goloka Dhama. These realms are surreal and nityā and ṣaṣwata. When in certain puranical notions. Krsna and Rama are described as Avatars of Sri Visnu, also don't misunderstand that Gargarishi in Garga Samhita mentions about Purnaavatar Sri Rama and Paripurnavatar Sri Krishna. Bhagavān doesn't count in mortals, hence their body is not flesh and blood. You cannot swallow the forest fires or lift the massy goverdhanā mountain which perimeters 22 miles as a 6 year old. These are ānshik shaktis of Sri bhagavan which they make use of while visiting Bhuloka.
Hare Krishna Hare Krishna Krishna Krishna Hare Hare Hare Rama Hare Rama Rama Rama Hare Hare🙏🙏🙏
Celestial Event mean Stars and planet positions
Hare Krishna Hare Krishna hare hare Hare Rama Hare Rama Rama Rama hare hare
Hare Radha Krishna🙏
Krishnam Vande Jagathguru 💗🙏🙏
HARE Krishna hare Krishna hare Krishna hare Krishna hare Krishna ❤
Somehow hearing that Krishna existed verifies what i have long thought to be true even though I think of myself as Buddhist. Many blessings n thank you so much. ❤❤❤
Hare krishna
Shree Buddha is considered to be 9th Avatar of Bhagwan Vishnu🙏
Namo Buddhay ❤ 🙏🚩
So confused Hindu np Buddhism is mostly copy paste Hinduism minus rhe most important aspect which is God/thyself
Come back to the path of God brother. Krishna/Hari is endless and he has endless love for all his devotees. His devotees who follow his teachings out of love get freed from the entanglement of pain and pleasure and reach the highest truth. The highest truth is also Him (parabrahm)
जय श्री कृष्ण 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
Hare Krishna Hare Radha
Hare Krishna ❤️🙏
Jai shree Krishna 🙏🙏🙏🙏
JAI JAI SHRI RADHE KRISHNA ♥️🙏🌸♥️
Alexander and Kalidas were human and there are lot of evidence like coins,inscriptions that Alexander exists. But all of them say that Alexander is a human and king who ruled many parts of the world.Same with Kalidas, who was a poet and we have his writings and poems as evidence. They never said they had magical powers or Alexander took many avatars
But with krishna, there are many temples and books written about him. He may be a human who lived 7500 years ago.
But his magical powers, avatars, sudarshana chakra in his fingers are totally unbelievable
It's honestly belief, without science faith dies and without faith science dies, that's what i think
Well in this way, same goes with any God worshipped on earth.
The mobile we use to communicate today is totally unbelievable instrument even before 500 years.
The dinosaurs skeleton we get today were be a myth if we didn't found them.
For universe we are just like a witty virus and even smaller than that. And here we are trying to judge creator of Universe in human body.
@@iaminmilkywaywell & truth said!
Finally a logical guy in the comment section 😅
@@iaminmilkyway For the universe we are universe ourselves. We are made up of star dusts. Our atoms will always exist regardless of anything. And i dont think so logically questioning "creator of our universe" would be so fragile for God for not to listen, afterall in theory it has created all of universe
Radhe Radhe Krishna 🙏
RADHE KRISHNA
Don't hear such people who don't know he is not like us. He is transcendental.
What makes you think that God is only transcendental,he is both immanent and transcendental.
Shivoham Shivoham
Hare Krishna 💞 radhe radhe 💞
Radhe Radhe❤
Jay jay shri radha krishn 😊
Radhe Radhe Radhe Radhe Radhe
Jai Shree Krishna 🙏🏻🙏🏻
Disney Land is evidence of the existence of Mickey Mouse.
viraj? more like siraj...
and yeah for your information - if thats what u want to say, then the whole world is disney land..
and u forgot ur brain somewhere.
❤ Sairam ❤ Jai Shree Krishna ❤
Jai shree hari ❤
How can anybody doubt?
Hare Krishna❤️🙏❤️🙏❤️🙏🕉
It's human nature to doubt things. Otherwise how are we any different than animals.
@@TGRRohitpeople who doubt even doubt there father is there biological father or is just stepfather 😂😂😂
@@TGRRohitthe doubting of things asking questions about existence is called philosophy, Vedant philosophy is one of the most considerable philosophy which say that there is one supreme Bhram and everyone atma is the ansh of the Bhram. Who is The bhram now? Its Krishna. Krishna as he is portrayed was always not a makhanchor who do rasleela at teenage. He was something different, you need to read Bhagvat Gita to Understand him.
Doubt cleared?
Radhe Radhe ❤❤❤❤
Jai Shree RadheKrishna
🙏🕉️ Ram Krishna Hari
Celestial evidence: trust me bro
Hare Krishna ❤
Hare Krishna Hare Krishna Krishna Krishna hare hare hare Ram hare Ram Ram Ram hare hare
Jai Shree Krishna
Hare krishna hare Krishna Krishna Krishna hare hare
Hare Rama hare Rama Rama Rama hare hare 🙂🧡
God coming in a human form as a Krishna Avatar or in any other form is no big deal for God because God is doing infinity amount of things in the Universe and beyond every micro or even smaller unit in a second. God is the creator and the creation.
Statue of Zeus also exists. That does not mean Zeus was real 😂
roman mythology got doomed years ago no one cares about them anymore but look at sanatan even after 1000yrs of continuous invasion still standing strong
OSM n4mn. Shukriya. Bravo. Mumbai
Said everything but evidence
OHM DHAMODHARAYA WITHMAHEE
RUKMINI VALLABHAYA DHEEMAHEE
THANNOOH KRISHNA PRAJOYDAYAATHE
THANNOOH KRISHNA PRAJOYDAYAATHE
HARE KRISHNA HARE KRISHNA
KRISHNA KRISHNA HARE HARE
HARE RAMA HARE RAMA
RAMA RAMA HARE HARE
OHM WRISHABHANUJAYA WITHMAHEE
KRISHNA PRIYAYA DHEEMAHEE
THANNOOH RADHAE PRAJOYDAYAATHE
THANNOOH RADHAE PRAJOYDAYAATHE
There are at least 14 independent sources that mention Jesus, including the letters of Paul, the writings of Jewish historian Flavius Josephus, and the writings of Roman historian Tacitus.


Contemporary sources
Biographers who lived during Jesus' time or shortly after quote from his letters and decrees, and describe his life in detail.

Non-biblical sources
In addition to the Bible, there are other non-biblical sources that support Jesus' existence, including the writings of Josephus and Tacitus.


Roman texts
Roman governor Pliny the Younger wrote to Emperor Trajan that early Christians would "sing hymns to Christ as to a god".

Historical timeline
Jesus is mentioned by Jewish and Roman historians within a few decades of his supposed lifetime.
In addition to that,there are over "25,000 Archeological findings of New Testament manuscripts."
Jay shree Krishna ❤🪈
Hari om tath sath❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
Jai Shri krishna
He spoke about evidence but didnt give any evidence 😅
well, if u know , u know and if u dont. then shut the hell up.
Hare krishna
hare krishna
Radhe radhe
Lord Jesus Christ, was a real person. We literally have eyewitness testimony, lord Jesus is not only mentioned in the Bible but also the Quran and even in Sanskrit texts of india. What more evidence do you need????
Are you talking about the astrological alignments? What are the time, date, and place of Krishna's birth?
Maybe
Yeah celestial evidence means the same.
Areh... ramayana likha gya tha abse 2000-3000 saal pehle...uske baad likha gya Mahabharat...
Aur inka real me hona koi proof nai hai...
Aur inhone Krishna ka proof nai dia bhai....bs yapping kr rahe the ki proof proof
Sit in mediation for now and then even for 5 min for 6 month as a practice . one can have idea of what God Is and at least be a nice human . Irony is people are too busy unable to do so ( forget about to be it )
Avengers Movies are strong evidence of the existence of Avengers.
Are u deaf, he said celestial evidence not archaeological. One more fool misunderstood the Supreme! By propaganda of people that still portrays Krishn as a makhanchor.
god! if nobody answered u when u said it in that mickey way, that means nobody wants to!!!
stop being a attention seeker.
He is acyuta who never falls from his position
This guy ❤
Is there also evidence about how he ran away from Kalayavan and vacated his capital fearing invasion by Jarasandh?
He is the most high on god knows what person to ever talk on this show 😂😂
Woow so true
That facial expression of this guy makes him existent.
❤🕉🚩🔱♥️
Logic has left the chat 😔
for u.
Sanatan hi satya hai
Same time as Mahabharata? He was present in the battlefield of Kurukshetra as the charioteer of Arjun.
Isse pehle log muje boycott karde.....i want to say that mai bhi 1 saal pehle aise saare videos dekhta tha even this guest ki bhi but ab ye itna jadya ho raha hai ki now its unbelievable and unrealistic.....Ranveer is now soo deep into pseudoscience now😑...... can't even expect some logical, rational, discussion on his podcasts......its either god, tantra, celebrities for their film promotions....... tanmay bhat ne sahi kaha tha he's a full time capitalist 😂
Krishna is not a avatar he is full sampoorna avatar
Ya because he was required to be as such nothing very special about it it's just the requirement of time
There are 3 sampoorna avataras of Vishnu.
Narasimha, Rama, Krishna
Can anyone please put some light on celestial evidence available??
What is the celestial evidence?
One debate with sj sir pls ..
You are wrong krishna form is transcedental and spiritual not like blood and flesh his birth and actions is divine
JATAKA TALES was written by Buddhas disciples.
Check all the books You will not find RAMA OR
KRISHNA. They are found in JATAKA TALES.
Please check ✅
5200 years ago was krishna... 7300 years ago was rama
so bro is lying or exaggerating
Ram was born in nearly 2000-3000 years ago... Krishna 2000-2500 years ago..
Read bhagvat geeta as it is
This.
Kalidas has written many literature lol 😂 we also have a movie on Kalidas 😂
❤️🕉️
Anyways , absence of proof does not mean proof of absence
kind sir, I would like to know what you are referring as celestial evidence.
It's the astronomical happenings and planetary positions.
Jai Shree Krishna❤️🧿😭
nice video
What is meant by celestial evidence?
Planatory positions we see from earth. Those positions from Mahabharata is that Celestial evidence.
@@TheModernThinkerWhat do those planetary evidence suggests about Krishna existence.
Which music is used over video.?
OMG movie background score
Want to go back to dwaparayug and see my supreme ,have to wait and pass many births to see my everything again my kalki my narayan
Is he talking about Oumuamua ?
NO sir !!!
Don't think "Krishna" as a PERSON
Because he is another name of "ब्रह्म"
Therefore he is eternal, omnipresent, formless, blissful, and cause of all causes (he is ब्रह्म)
Krishna is a person only in MAHABHARAT story
In reality, he is NOT a person
Krishna has a sat chitananda body not like made of flesh bone and mucous like ours
What are those celestial evidence?
Which celestial evidence?
He didn't tell what the celestial evidence is.😮
But what is the Celestial evidence?
Blood, Flesh and Bones ???
Seriously??
The Creator of the Universe Brahma (Who's entire body is made of Intelligence) Himself Says in Brahma Samhita 5.1 that -
Ishvara Parama Krishna
Sad-cid-anand Vigraha
Anadir Adir Govinda
Sarva Karana Karanam
Sad means Eternal, Cid means full of knowledge and Anand means full of Bliss....
His body and conscious itself is one.
In BG - 9.11 Krishna Says - "Fools deride Me when I descend in the human form. They do not know My transcendental nature as the Supreme Lord of all that be."
Atleast Know before you Speak...
Harekrsna
What celestial evidence
I didn't understand what he meant by celestial evidence...
Position of stars and planets, no one can play with them (except the supreme)
0 MY FOOT ITS WRITTEN IN BIBLE AND QURAN
Ye banda apni budhi ke bare mein baat kar raha hai 😂
Did not live in blood, flesh and bones, his form is sat chid Ananda
Sorry , he is 9 th avatar .
🙏🙏