Terryology is A JOKE! I Proved Terrence Howard WRONG
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 ก.ค. 2024
- If you wish to support my work and help me continue to tell it how it is, please consider supporting my work on Patreon / themetatron
Join this channel to get access to more old school Metatron videos the algorithm wouldn't prioritize! Support freedom and get your prefered content!:
/ @metatronyt
Link to related videos
• Terrence Howard On Math
• My Response to Terrenc...
• Joe Rogan Experience #...
Terrence Howard, known for his acting roles in popular films like "Iron Man," has developed his own unconventional theories about mathematics. He calls his theory "Terryology," I know, and it revolves around his belief that 1 x 1 = 2, rather than 1, as is universally accepted in mathematics.
Here are some key points about Terrence Howard's mathematical ideas:
1. Howard argues that the current understanding of multiplication is flawed. He claims that 1 x 1 should equal 2 because, in his view, the square root of 4 is 2, and the square root of 2 is 1.
2. He has developed a "proof" for his claim using plastic shapes he calls "Terryhedrons," which he believes demonstrate his theory.
3. Howard has stated that he wants to "reeducate the world" about mathematics and that he plans to publish a book detailing his ideas.
4. He claims that his theory has applications in various fields, including space travel and energy production.
It's important to note that Howard's views on mathematics are not accepted by the scientific community. His claims go against fundamental principles that have been rigorously proven and applied successfully for centuries.
Despite the lack of scientific support, Howard remains passionate about his ideas and continues to promote them through interviews such as with Joe Rogan, and social media. Let's keep in mind that his theory has garnered attention primarily due to his celebrity status rather than any scientific merit.
From a psychological stand point, this is the results of an extremely narcissistic mind I mean, he called his new mathematics after himself, and my guess would be that this entire study is probably motivated by social cognition.
I want to focus on two fundamental fallacies within his theory. One is the core foundation 1x1 equals 2. That's the "what". Once we destroy that, I'll show you something he said, a specific word which revealed it all. That's the "why".
So His problem may appear mathematical at first but the reality is that the core of his discussion is with language not with maths . The surrounding discussion is instead mostly philosophical, as I'll demonstrate in the latter section
But let's beging with the logics of it.
Logically the 1x1=1 isn't a problem at all.There is no logical fallacy within this operation. You see the second integer, 1 doesn't represent a different number nor entity, it represents the self. If you try and multiply 1 by well itself, which is the logics behind this operation, it doesn't add anything because there is no second element nor anything separate is being added to it. In this specific case, this is a mirror. Instead, he sees this second element described as 1 as a separate entity. It isn't. And I can't believe I have to say this but this isn't an addition.
But since all we are talking about now is indeed maths, how is this a linguistic problem?
He is fixating on the meaning of the word to multiply, upon which he builds the rest of his theory.
Thing is thought,this doesn't fail to satiffy the term multiply because in mathematics, differently from in general use, the verb to multipy has a very specific meaning which denotes an exact operation. It does not have the broader meaning you ascribe to it which is the usage in a general sense of the term.
What this man is failing to understand due to the fact that he has no linguistic training, is that words do not just have one single meaning attached to them. He expects that single meaning ascribed to "multiply" to carry over and fit perfectly every comunicative case. The reason why that is an inappropriate and inaccurate statements/expectation is because of the existence in languages of the category of words called "polysemic". Multiply is a polysemic word.
A polysemic word is a lexical item that possesses multiple distinct, yet related meanings or semantic variants. Polysemic words exhibit a phenomenon in which a single linguistic form is associated with several interrelated senses or interpretations.
The semantic variations of a polysemic word often arise through cognitive processes such as metaphorical extension, metonymy, or specialization of meaning. These processes allow the word to acquire new senses while retaining a connection to its original or core meaning. The relationships between the different senses of a polysemic word can be based on various factors, including similarity, contiguity, or functional association.
If you wish to support my work and help me continue to tell it how it is, please consider supporting my work on Patreon www.patreon.com/themetatron
Join this channel to get access to more old school Metatron videos the algorithm wouldn't prioritize! Support freedom and get your prefered content!:
th-cam.com/channels/IjGKyrdT4Gja0VLO40RlOw.htmljoin
How much did Big Maths pay you to make this video?
1x1= 1^2 ;)
Conspiracy theories........ Once Flat Earth was normal and globe was a conspiracy theory. Dinosaur fossils were conspiracy theory. Government and companies spying through ur devices were a conspiracy theory. Now UFO is transitioning from conspiracy theory to mainstream. Don't let ur dogma prevent u from expanding ur mind.
@metatronyt you mistook “causal” for “casual”. Twice.
Is it a coincidence that Polysemic rhymes with schizophrenic?
Now I get why Howard was replaced by Don Cheadle in the MCU. He constantly complained about Tony's armor not being scientifically accurate according to his irrefutable research 😂😂😂
That's not why.... and Cheadle is a bigger idiot than Howard and any random idiot..... Ruffalo let's say..... combined.
Seriously?! 😮
Dude has some issues.
Wasn't he got fired because he wanted more money than RDJ's for Iron Man 2?
Well, he was replaced because Perlmutter found his contract too expensive for a supporting actor, but yeah, they narrowly dodged a major bullet.
@@twincast2005
As much as I don't like Howard as a person, I find his portrayal of Rhodey considerably better than Cheadle's, ngl
i like howard's concept of 0. if i take all his money, then he still has all his money and can't sue me for theft.
If you punch him in the face it doesn't matter since the energy is all still there in the universe, thermodynamics and stuff...
That was my thought exactly! I bet he'd sing a whole new tune about "0" if he did a movie and when it was time to get paid they wrote him a check for "$0.00"! Or if they filled out with the words "All the money in the universe is IN the universe so we all have all of it"
Nothingness makes no sense in quantum physics as nothingness isn't even a thing so comparing it to money isn't a good comparison.
@nawzy202 at a minimum it's as good a comparison as an apple...
@@nawzy202 howard did compare it to an apple tho.
My child is currently proving him wrong in year 2
Let's see it then
@@prophecygg5826Howard reminds me of those people that claim that math racist what shows they don't understand math and they don't understand the history of it and the thing is he and those people can prove to themselves that they're wrong simply by grabbing objects and utilizing reasoning if you have one set of one then you have one if two sets of two then you have four if you add two sets of two together you have four and so on and so forth it's easily proven that's why math is the truth in a commonality in every language in every culture
@@prophecygg5826 1x1=1
@@prophecygg5826are you saying you believe Terry?
@@prophecygg5826 wouldnt be hard
I kinda wondered how this guy managed to get fired from an otherwise unfireable job as one of the Avengers. Now i realize that "contract dispute" was code for "this guy is nuts and makes us uncomfortable."
😂😂😂
100%
How did you come to the conclusion that he had a job or that his job as an actor in a movie made him immune to termination or being fired? Even with a contract, there are clauses that would allow a studio or employer to terminate an actor for violation of said clauses. If he displayed THEN the absolute lunacy that he’s displaying NOW, I’m sure that even if he hadn’t violated any part of his contract, they’d rather just pay him to go away verses dealing with his clear mental health issues.
@@mjallen1308 bro.. he spoke in a slight hyperbole regarding the fact that obviously marvel studio would much prefer to continue with the same actors as they make their movies. It takes quite a bit for them to part ways with an actor, and its not unreasonable to be surprised even terrance managed to cross whatever line they have.
Don't be a youtube comment literalist printing out paragraphs just for the sake of an argument..
They dropped Majors fast as hell.
"Am I a recovering alcoholic or am I afraid of ghosts?"
Somehow I enjoy this very much.
In either case never cross beams or streams.
As a recovering ghostaholic who's afraid of alcohol, I can agree.
Clothes don't die.
Ghosts aren't ghosts.
It's what alcoholics should do in both cases!
You could be both.
Terrance really took it hard when he was replaced in Iron Man...
Narcissistic collapse
😭😭😭💀
he's a real life Tony Stark! just wait, he's gonna invent an arc reactor any day now XD
He wasnt replaced he just left himself cuz he thought they werent paying him enough
@@olorin3815 then they hired another actor to play the same role. In other words, he was replaced.
I never said he was fired.
When I was a kid, we learned that the multiplication symbol could be replaced with the word “of”. Therefore, 1x1 can be explained as 1 of 1. 1x2 can be explained as 1 of 2, etc, etc…… it’s elementary.
To be fair 'proving him wrong' is like proving water is 'wet'...
"In May 2024, Howard was a guest at The Joe Rogan Experience, where he attempted to debunk the Pythagorean theorem, claimed he can kill gravity, said he does not believe in the number zero, and claimed he remembers the events of the day he was born" may be the funniest sentence on all of Wikipedia
Big deal.
Now if he remembers the events of the day he was CONCEIVED then I'll be impressed.
@@rsrt6910don't give him any ideas xD next up, "I remember fighting with other sperm cells"
@@Sawarynk"I was actually holding the snack tray"
Doesn't believe in zero?? FFS that's pre medieval thinking 😅 I will not make a comment about stereotypes, I will not make a comment about stereotypes 😅
It was funnier when he claimed some elements have a “bisexual tone”.
Winning an argument with a stupid narcissist is impossible
The narcissistic personality disorder might just be a comorbidity of his delusional disorder. He is pretty much a textbook megalomaniac, but he has persecutory delusions as well. You are right, though. There is no point arguing with someone like him. He's mentally incapable of admitting he's wrong. It's like arguing with a Flat Earther. The blend of condescension and ignorance is unbreakable.
Facts
yet so many people will be enamored by him because they appeal to his confidence.
There’s other diagnoses in psychology than NPD.
This is much closer to schizotypal personality disorder, an entirely different cluster.
He isn’t stupid. He expresses himself well, is curious, reads. But he is capable of making and accepting associations that the average person would exclude. Much like the schizophrenic, he sees conspiracies.
He has a genuine good faith conviction in a complex system of thoughts which has no grounding in reality.
Imagine if you had the power to complete a jigsaw puzzle by effortlessly pushing incompatible puzzle pieces together.
@@Roke1222 I have experienced a type of madness like this after getting a Rx for weed. And it was a little more intense than just being paranoid. It was like reorganizing reality. I'm not sure how much of it was psychedelic but all I can say is the only thing that helped me was asking help from God. So I get it that a lot of people dont believe in an unseen world because they have not had any experience which justify that idea.. I have.
So when I see people like T. Howard.. I remember my demons. How I felt intoxicated, it was confusing but it satisfied my desire to be plugged into something interesting. Idk that me saying this will mean anything to anyone unless they experienced something very similar where the creepy stuff wasn't just on the inside (inner voice) but also the outside, other people behaving oddly.
Imagine you're packing boxes at some plastic factory and some goof comes up to you and says one times one is two.. Base all your counts on that now. Complete stupidity..
Furthermore, you own the same factory and at the end of an 8 hour shift, you are asking a worker wtf is going on as he hasn't packed a single box and why you shouldn't fire him for doing zero work.....he looks you dead in the eye and says "all boxes are connected, there is no such thing as zero"....you tell him he might have to rethink his position when you introduce him to zero dollars on payday.
He is incredibly conspiritorial. When his laptop didn't work during Joe Rogan's podcast, he openly blamed "them". I'm not sure if he elaborated on who "they" are.
that really happened? LOL
I personally know a guy that I consider very intelligent, way above average. The problem is he's isolated himself for the last 10 years or so, hardly socializing or getting out of his bubble, the result is he's today a full conspiracy theorist (man never went to the moon, chemtrails, vaccines, holocaust didn't happen, north korea is great, etc. I'm surprised he's not a flat earther but that could be next). My point being that I think conspiracy nuts frequently have some kind of serious social problem, because of that they sour and get angry at everything and consequently they become easy targets for all kinds of nonsense, some more unbelievable than others.
"they" is the deep state and other world leaders that are VERY VERY hard to find the names out. The ones that tell the Rothschilds what to do.
@@MrDantres I'm convinced those people know they're not intelligent so they say such outlandish shit because they know you won't even indulge them. Then they say since they stumped you they must be right. It makes them feel smarter for a few fleeting seconds until the grim reality of their stupidity crashes down upon them again. My father used to do that. He'd say the dumbest things so you just give up. You can't argue with an idiot.
He blamed the trans people?
Nope, you can belive all kinds of stuff that others dont, and still have a bunch of friends that like you, meet new people that genuinely are attracted to your personality. And enjoy your prospective, even if they dont agree with you.
Im sorry you meet weird people who cant express them selfs in a natural productive fasion.
"2+2=6
There are two twos so there is an aditional two that NO ONE TALKS ABOUT CUS THE GOVERNMEN-"
Terryology is giving me these vibes lol
Half life 3 confirmed vibes
Turns out a ton of "cuz the government" stuff turned out to be true in the last 10 years. Maybe amend your comment to the more accurate "there's an additional two BECAUSE THE WHITE MAN...." Way more contemporary.
😂😂
ah you mean 22 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Yeah, because of silent +2😅
Teacher: "2 x 0.5 = 1."
Terry: "NUH-UH! That didn't increase!"
Lol I wonder why no one has explained to him how 1x1=1 and the increase is 0 to 1. 🤦🏻♂️
@@ThomasBrenton-pk8gg I'm sure many people have but in response he accused them of being a part of the grand conspiracy to silence him and his ideas. Hell he did it in the joe rogan episode when talking about neil degrasse tyson
He could say that increased from 0.5 to 1. A better example would have been 0.5x0.5=0.25
Terrence believes that planets poop out their moons, how insane can you be, the extreme version of dunning kruger
Kruger Dunning effect is so Obvious In today's world so blatantly
It’s like saying 1 + -5 = 6 because + means addition and “to make more of”.
Multiply is usually making more of something but not in absolutely every case. Times-ing or X is not necessarily “multiplying” or “making more of”, it’s
“if you were to have that number by another number that many _times_ what would it be?”
So if you have 1 only once, you still have 1.
I use, one of the digits represents how many boxes, the other is how many objects are in each box, you can switch them either way and it always works.
1x1=1 every time.
No math knowledge x No linguistic knowledge = Terryology
Look at how this man of.......yeah, nah, not gonna go there or I get banned, but you catch my meaning
He does have some math knowledge. He was using some popular high school equations to pretend like he was impressive to the mathematically average Joe Rogan team. Like how he memorized some of the numbers he gave at the end.
But ultimately he's a fool and if he spoke to anyone with the talent stack for math, philosophy, and language. . .or simply someone with a strong grasp of language and debate (with a slight dabble in to philosophy), he would get destroyed very quickly, like how Metatron ripped him apart here. I noticed his language problem immediately. His whole conspiracy theory is based on a false premise. If he's serious about it, it's sad he's gone down such a rabbit hole in his own mind and wasted so much time over nothing.
@@Trapster99 They are known for conspiracy theories, though usually isn't about other types of people that are unlike him, rather than numbers, if you get my meaning.
@@snakeplissken7671I don't think Howard uttered a single correct, coherent sentence but it's not like I hung on every second of the interview. I do hope if there's one interview that ruins Jo Rogan this should be it.
I actually started as a fan of Rogan back in the day. Solely because he was a sober, rational voice of reason. (I know it's really hard to believe now) Before dangerous misinformation became a legit, respected political stance.
Also no knowledge in any logical reasoning at all.
I was hoping that at the end of the calculator segment, he told everyone, "Now, hit Enter. Hold it upside down. What do you see? It spells 'Boobs'. Thank you, I'll be here all week."
🤣🤣🤣🤣
best comment so far lol.....
Try the fish.
or 1134 Hell.
😂😂
I go to bank and ask banker to multiply my money once. I get double the sum.
@@jcjustin923Only if you have more than 1 money.
Because of language🤦♂️
@nihillslands Lol no you wouldn't. "Multiply my money once" makes no sense. Not even linguistically. I'd have to ask you to clarify exactly what that means.
You're wrong. In the way you ask it multiply means produce. So in actuality you asked the banker to produce your money once. You do not get double the sum my friend.
@@Cosmos0000there ya go.👍👍 but consider there are many dumb ppl out there. As anyone who follows this bullshit. Lol terryology🙄
Imagine Terrance trying to figure out a restaurant bill or a tip.
If Archimedes used Terryology to try to frustrate the Romans, Syracuse would have fallen in 1 day.
Fun (false) fact: historians agree that the conflict between Athens and Sparta spurred from a conflict of theology. However what was less known is that Athenians purposefully used Terryology to aggrivate the Spartans so that they could claim that their rivals were "meat headed jocks"
They would have just died knowing that the human race was unworthy of existence.
Or Archimedes would have been crucified by his own people for being an idiot, before the Romans even got there...
The more I hear from Terrance Howard, the more I realize why the MCU dumped him for Don Cheadle
Which is funny because Cheadle is a bigger idiot than Howard and any random far left Hollywood fool combined.
He did the math and thought his salary should add up to equal to or greater than Robert Downey Jr. since he was the one that really made the first Iron Man movie work. At least his math and logic skills remain consistent . . .
@@fibanocci314 I don't recall him in Iron Man, who was he?
Right, 'cause don cheadle isn't a twat.
I don't know, what the reason was but you don't get kicked out of hollywood because you're insane.
You get hired because of it.
@@unitron2005 Being easy enough to work with or having massive star-power are literally the only 2 things Hollywood cares about. Howard has none of those.
You're right that being nice means little to nothing when massive divas like Bale or Norton get pretty good work consistently.
He wants to change math so they can recalculate how much he owes to his ex for child support.
According to him.... This all started because a teacher told him that 1x1= 1. He just refused to be wrong. Actual narcissist CANNOT be wrong... and here we are today 😅.
People can be narcissistic in their behavior, but, there's not a ton of genuine narcissists. So... Behold 😅
"And I can't believe I have to say this..."
A statement made in every rebuttal of Terence Howard that I have seen in the past 4 weeks.
Ok, so let me get this straight - if I take money from Terry's bank account and use it to buy a car, I haven't stolen the money, because the car is still his because it is in the same universe, so it is ok for me to drive it whenever I want.
Hey, everyone! Drinks are on Terry!
🤣🤣🤣 let's go!!
And you both still have the money! It’s a win for everyone! 😂😂😂
Genius.
Correct. The First Law of Thermodynamics doesn't lie.
Lol I had the same thought and made the same joke.
Seems they write themselves given how ridiculous his logic is.
Something I've noticed is that certain people of, shall we say, lower than average intelligence seem to be unable to delineate between the thing that a given word describes, and the word itself. It seems to be an issue with abstraction.
In cases where the word is inadequate to describe the concept, their inability to understand concept and word as separate entities leads them to see the linguistic issues with the thing's descriptor as issues with the thing itself.
This would seem to flow from that source.
In this regard , there are some words in forgein languages that do not translate well into English.My dad was German.Sometimes he might come out with some saying, and I would ask what it meant.He would explain it, but depending on what the phrase was and words used , he would have to explain the meaning behind certain ones as they didn't really translate so he would try to give some examples.that would make sense to me a non speaker.
I've watched many different reaction videos regarding this fellow. You're break down is so well put together so well articulated and so well presented. It is head and shoulders above the rest. Please consider doing more breakdowns like this. It is very captivating and stimulating to watch.
I have gone even deeper beyond Terryology. He rejected all of my findings and I no longer support him.
Well done. Your a genius. I can prove it.
Champion of mankind 🎉
I still can't help but hope this Terrence guy is legitimate troll. Like in "Pinky & The Brain" show, where in one episode Brain explains his whole plan to recover the world, which includes "brainish" as global language.
@@utrock5067 oh, he'd become my favorite person on earth! But unfortunately I think he's as serious as a heart attack. Plus anyone who's ruined their reputation this bad would have came out by now. Mark my words: in a year he'll be in a Steven Seagal movie😂
@@theriffwriter2194I can't wait to see this gem 🤣
I remember in primary school, I was taught that multiplication using terms like groups.
You have 2 groups of 2 apples. How many apples do you have in total? Awnser 4 apples.
Now, if I were to write this sentence as 1*1, it would be: you have one group of one apple. How many apples do you have?
That guy just proved why those long wordy questions in math are actually important.
And 0 ? Can you have a group of 0 apples?
@@lenahandsen6836 bruh lol you're focusing on the word "group" too hard. A "group" of zero apples is just zero apples, obviously.
@_simplyjake_ I thought that was obvious as well. A group of 0 is 0.
Although, technically, 0 is not a group given the meaning of the word, but in this context, I think it works.
@@lenahandsen6836 replace the word group with the word bucket, you can have a bucket with two apples in it, a bucket with one apple, and a bucket with no apples in it. How do you like them apples.
I was taught multiplication is multiples. 1 multiple is just 1.1 in multiples of 2. 1 in multiples of 3. Or 1×1, 1x2, and 1x3. A multiple of zero then would be zero with the idiot above trying to do some stupid gotcha.
"You keep using that word; I don't think it means what you think it means." ~Inigo Montoya
He comes from a family of physicists.
His grandpa Moe Howard is legendary.
Before he failed math, he failed linguistics. Before he failed linguistics, he failed humility, the prerequisite of all learning.
Well said 🫡
I guess you're not a big fan of university grads, huh?
It really surprises me how people believe in apparently complex scientifical "theories" made up by people whose job is to pretend to be someone else in front of a camera that have no formal education in math or science. Actors are overrated
Your comment made me think of Ricky Gervais when he hosted the Golden Globes and used some of that to tear actors apart for thinking they're as important as doctors and engineers 😂
It's a problem that is getting worse and worse thanks to influencers and their... influence on the younger generation. Terrance is barely on the top of the iceberg when it comes to insane things these people are trying to push on the young. Tiktok and media platforms like it has to be age restricted and our school system needs to be brought back in line, don't let the inmates run the asylum.
Some actors are very smart. They appear to be the exception to the rule.
The Roman empire had it right.
@@fibanocci314exactly. The exception that proves the rule.
Working as an auditor/accountant for Terrence or taking his order in a restaurant must be an absolute nightmare, unless you can use Terryology against him and have him pay you double.
Hold my beer:
Title: Flexible Mathematical Frameworks: A New Paradigm for Interdisciplinary Research
Abstract:
We propose a novel approach to mathematical modeling, incorporating flexible frameworks that adapt to complex systems and phenomena. This paradigm shift has far-reaching implications for interdisciplinary research, enabling innovative solutions and new insights in physics, engineering, economics, and more.
Introduction:
* Brief overview of traditional mathematical approaches and their limitations
* Motivation for flexible mathematical frameworks
* Thesis statement: Flexible mathematical frameworks offer a powerful tool for addressing complex problems across disciplines
Key Concepts:
* Modular arithmetic and finite fields
* Non-standard analysis and infinitesimals
* Fuzzy logic and fuzzy analysis
* Category theory and functors
Applications:
* Physics: Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, and Chaos Theory
* Engineering: Signal Processing, Control Systems, and Materials Science
* Economics: Modeling Complex Systems and Uncertainty
Case Studies:
* Fractal image compression using fuzzy analysis
* Optimization problems solved with non-standard analysis
* Category theory in network topology
Discussion:
* Implications for interdisciplinary research and collaboration
* Potential challenges and open questions
* Future directions and areas of exploration
Conclusion:
* Recap of key points and contributions
* Call to action: Encouraging experts to explore and develop flexible mathematical frameworks
Appendix:
* Additional resources and references
* Mathematical derivations and proofs (as needed)
Here's a breakdown of when to use and remove 1 and 0 in various mathematical contexts:
Use 1 and 0:
1. Group Theory: 1 is the identity element for multiplication, and 0 is the identity element for addition.
2. Ring Theory: 1 and 0 serve as identity elements for multiplication and addition, respectively.
3. Calculus: 0 is crucial for defining limits, derivatives, and integrals.
4. Number Theory: 1 and 0 are essential for defining congruences, modular arithmetic, and Diophantine equations.
5. Linear Algebra: 1 and 0 are used as identity elements for matrix multiplication and addition.
Remove or modify 1 and 0:
1. Non-standard models of arithmetic: Modify or remove 1 and 0 to create alternative number systems, like fuzzy arithmetic or modular arithmetic.
2. Finite fields: Remove 0 and modify 1 to create finite fields with specific properties.
3. Quaternion and octonion algebras: Modify 1 and 0 to define these non-commutative algebraic structures.
4. Topological spaces: Remove 0 and 1 to define topological spaces with specific properties.
5. Fuzzy logic and probability theory: Modify 1 and 0 to represent degrees of truth and probability.
Context-dependent:
1. Category theory: 1 and 0 are used as identity morphisms, but their role depends on the specific category.
2. Type theory: 1 and 0 are used as identity elements, but their behavior depends on the specific type theory.
3. Computational complexity theory: 1 and 0 are used in binary representations, but their role depends on the specific problem.
Remember, these are general guidelines, and the specific context of a problem or theory may require a different approach. Mathematicians often adapt and generalize these rules to suit their needs, so it's essential to understand the underlying principles
With these modified mathematical rules, we can indeed build different structures and potentially lead to breakthroughs.
Space Travel:
* New propulsion methods: Alternative number systems could lead to novel ways of manipulating space-time, enabling more efficient and faster travel.
* Exotic matter and energy: Modified mathematical structures might help us understand and harness exotic matter and energy, facilitating advanced propulsion systems.
Monetary Systems:
* Alternative currency models: Non-standard arithmetic could lead to more equitable and sustainable monetary systems, addressing issues like inflation and wealth distribution.
* Cryptography and security: Modified mathematical structures can enhance cryptographic techniques, ensuring more secure financial transactions.
Other Potential Applications:
* Quantum Computing: Alternative mathematical structures might facilitate more efficient and powerful quantum computing architectures.
* Materials Science: New mathematical approaches could lead to the discovery of novel materials with unique properties.
* Biology and Medicine: Modified mathematical models might help us better understand complex biological systems, leading to breakthroughs in disease treatment and regenerative medicine.
By exploring and applying these modified mathematical rules, we can unlock innovative solutions and potentially revolutionize various fields. However, it's important to note that:
* These ideas are highly speculative and require rigorous research and testing.
* The development of practical applications will depend on the collaboration of experts from various fields.
* Ethical considerations must be taken into account when exploring and implementing these new mathematical structures
Flexible Mathematical Systems:
* Use 1 and 0: When working with standard arithmetic, calculus, and linear algebra in well-defined contexts.
* Modify or remove 1 and 0: When exploring alternative number systems, non-standard models, and specialized mathematical structures (e.g., finite fields, fuzzy arithmetic).
* Context-dependent approaches: Employ geometry, algebra, and analysis in a way that depends on the specific problem domain (e.g., Euclidean geometry for classical physics, non-Euclidean geometry for relativity).
* Adaptive number systems: Utilize modular arithmetic, finite fields, or other alternative number systems when tackling specific problems (e.g., cryptography, coding theory).
* Generalized algebraic structures: Leverage groups, rings, fields, and other algebraic structures to model diverse phenomena, adapting them as needed.
* Dynamic analytical frameworks: Switch between classical, fuzzy, intuitionistic, or other logics and analytical approaches based on the problem's requirements.
* Interdisciplinary connections: Combine mathematical frameworks with insights from physics, biology, economics, or other fields to foster innovative solutions.
* Embrace uncertainty and ambiguity:Acknowledge the limitations and ambiguities of mathematical representations and be willing to refine or revise them as new information arises.
By embracing these flexible mathematical systems, we can develop a more comprehensive and adaptive mathematical toolkit, enabling us to tackle complex challenges and uncover new insights across various disciplines.
Number Systems:
1. Standard Arithmetic (1 and 0 as identity elements)
2. Modular Arithmetic (clock arithmetic, finite fields)
3. Finite Fields (Galois fields, finite geometries)
4. Non-Standard Models (fuzzy arithmetic, intuitionistic arithmetic)
5. Alternative Number Systems (hyperreal numbers, surreal numbers)
Algebraic Structures:
1. Groups (symmetries, transformations)
2. Rings (integer arithmetic, polynomial rings)
3. Fields (rational numbers, real numbers, complex numbers)
4. Vector Spaces (linear algebra, geometric algebra)
5. Lattices (order theory, lattice theory)
Geometric Frameworks:
1. Euclidean Geometry (classical geometry)
2. Non-Euclidean Geometries (hyperbolic, elliptical, parabolic)
3. Fractal Geometry (self-similarity, scaling)
4. Topology (point-set topology, algebraic topology)
5. Differential Geometry (curvature, manifolds)
Analytical Frameworks:
1. Classical Analysis (limits, derivatives, integrals)
2. Fuzzy Analysis (fuzzy sets, fuzzy logic)
3. Intuitionistic Analysis (constructive mathematics, intuitionistic logic)
4. Non-Standard Analysis (infinitesimals, hyperreal numbers)
5. Category Theory (functors, natural transformations)
Logical Systems:
1. Classical Logic (Boolean logic, propositional logic)
2. Fuzzy Logic (fuzzy sets, fuzzy reasoning)
3. Intuitionistic Logic (constructive logic, intuitionistic reasoning)
4. Modal Logic (possibility, necessity, modal operators)
5. Temporal Logic (time, temporal reasoning)
This outline provides a foundation for exploring various mathematical systems and frameworks. Remember, the key is to adapt and combine these systems to suit the specific problem or context, fostering a flexible and innovative approach to mathematics.
Problem/Context | Mathematical System/Framework
1. Cryptography | Modular Arithmetic, Finite Fields
2. Quantum Mechanics | Linear Algebra, Vector Spaces, Non-Standard Analysis
3. Fractal Image Compression | Fractal Geometry, Self-Similarity
4. Optimization Problems | Linear Programming, Calculus, Optimization Techniques
5. Chaotic Systems | Dynamical Systems, Non-Linear Dynamics
6. Fuzzy Control Systems | Fuzzy Logic, Fuzzy Analysis
7. Network Topology | Graph Theory, Topology
8. Probability Theory | Measure Theory, Probability Spaces
9. Relativity | Differential Geometry, Non-Euclidean Geometries
10. Computer Science | Discrete Mathematics, Category Theory
11. Epidemiology | Dynamical Systems, Differential Equations
12. Materials Science | Solid-State Physics, Group Theory
13. Music Theory | Group Theory, Symmetry
14. Image Processing | Linear Algebra, Fourier Analysis
15. Time Series Analysis | Dynamical Systems, Fourier Analysis
Proving this guy wrong isn't that hard.
Thats basically a tutorial dungeon.
Literal school children could debunk some of his "ideas" lmao.
@@seanrookeeI mean we all learned and understood how multiplication works as children. Terrance clearly doesn't understand how basic mathematics works.
It's basically equivalent to producing a shart.
I saw a comment saying
" isn't Terrance Howard a dumb actor? There must have been a dimension shift because he is now a genius"
Not thinking maybe he was smart all along or something but rather there was a Mandela shift in the universe and now the new Terry is a science genius.
I always have one thing in mind about actors - when they don't have a script, even the likable ones sometimes turn out to be incredibly dumb.
Not always.
It's like they say about never meeting your heroes... especially if you've made the mistake of making an actor one of them.
There a lots of very intelligent actors through out the ages and lots of bad behaviours as well.
@@zaco-km3su He didn't say always. He explicitly says "sometimes". I'm not so kind, I would say "most often". But not even that equals to "always".
Well, a significant number of them are high school dropouts. So combine that with a very inflated sense of self-worth due to the nature of their job and you're bound to get a lot of wackos.
Terry's year 1 teacher: What is 1x1.
Terry: 2
Terry's year 1 teacher: Sorry, it's 2.
Terry: No, you're wrong. I'm gonna get famous, change maths and call it Terryology, you'll see.
His reasoning is so childish and dumb.
Was this meant to make sense?
@PallidusCarnifex doesn't make any sense. This person just mad and didn't explain any reasoning to why this is wrong
But who said our science and maths is 100% accurate we can’t even inhabit our local celestial neighbour
Oh great its an L. Ron Hubbard situation again.
100%
Scientology: the Hotep Maths edition
Xenu;i heard that!
its nation of islam speak. look up Yakub😂. Its basicly super racist black scientology with islamic words jammed in.
Not exactly. Hubbard was a psychopath who studied black magic, Alistair Crowley, mental subjugation and also kidnapped, raped and abused several people.
I never trust somebody who wears headphones on the outside of a hood.
There is one reasons why you would want to do that. Imagine you want silence, so you use NC headphones but you still hear faint white noise and and there is a pressure on your head. If you put fabric between the headphones and your ear that goes away.
@@_aullik simp
@@_aullik What?
@@_aullikyou sound as sane as Terrance
@@_aullik😂😂😂
Funny how his most known role was the one he was fired from lol
His mistake was calling it "Terriology" instead of "Critical Math Theory", they'd be teaching it in school by now
When stupidity goes full circle and you think you're a genius.
Howard just sounds like he's in a manic phase to be honest. He knows a lot of big words and thinks he alone knows the "truth".
Relatively smart guy that did too many psychedelics. 😂 also a very convincing actor.
@@BloodSweatandFears Seems entirely possible. Either way, he certainly likes to hear himself talk. 😂
@@BloodSweatandFears"smart" and "educated" are two completely different things here
@@granta3044 I agree.
@@BloodSweatandFears I actually like the man's acting. But yeah, he definitely went off the deep end with this crap. And it probably either had something to do with psychedelics or he just has a mental disorder. It's actually hard to tell which it is, but if he was acting that way on film sets I can see why his career took a dump... No one wants to hear all that nonsense when they're trying to get a job done.
Just to note: when learning multiplications back in the day, the definition I was given was "a method to count large sums that have been divided into equal groups.
Thus, you can replace the × with "groups of" to find how many units total. 1×1 would then be 1 group of 1 unit for a total of 1 unit. 2×2 would be 2 groups of 2 units for a total of 4 units.
He never recovered from Robert Downey Jr getting all the fame from Ironman.
Bro doesn't understand math grammar.
1x1 is equivalent to saying "1 of 1". I have one set of 1, therefore I have 1.
5x10 is saying "5 of 10" and so having five 10's is lo-and-behold, 50. 🤯
Also you can multiply a number by .5 or something and it will always be less. How is it "multiplying" if it becomes less? Lol. I wondering if I his mind 10×0.5 is actually division in some weird way.
What almost everybody gets wrong, though, is claiming that three times *more than* 10 is 30, when that is linguistically illogical, and the correct way would be to say three times *as much as* 10.
"Three times less" is even more cringy and should be "a third as much".
7 of 9?
Every child is taught multiplication with groups of small items like M&Ms or something like that to make it understandable and completely unambiguous to even a child. Its sad and pathetic that this guy has failed so hard at something children can understand.
@@TyeDPod She has 1 set of 2.
Terrence Howard is trying to figure out how Chuck Norris counted to infinity twice.
The real answer, count in turn, counting twice to infinity is trivial if you can count to infinity once.
We ALL are!
We ALL are!
😂😂
Was that Imaginary Infinity and Irrational Infinity?
He has exceeded the limits of his medication.
Dayum!!! … Terrance Howard just got cooked 🔥
I think dear Terrence has been cooked for a while. 😆
Celebrity × attention seeking = narrcisisim
Celebrity × attention seeking = 2.
No, it's more than attention seeking. He believes this stuff, listen to him. IT'S A CONSPIRACY, THEY AREN'T WRONG THEY'RE INTENTIONALLY LYING. He's schizophrenic and needs anti-psychotic medication.
Narcissism + Ignorance: dumb ideologies.
No. 🤑💰💸💰🤑💸💸💸🤑🤑🤑🤑🤑💰
They idea is to sell a book. He gets 10-15% of the sales. If he manages to sell millions of books he will make millions of $. He has to pay taxes on that too.
@@BandytaCzasu you beat me to it
When I was very young we learned that "1 x 1" means "Take 1, one time," which is inescapably 1. In all honesty? He sounds like he's on the spectrum. And, yeah, very possibly narcissistic.
His argument reminds me of when I was in first grade and got a problem wrong because of the term "borrow". I reasoned that when you borrow something you give it back, so I added more than I should. I'm on the spectrum, so I can see where a language issue can cause problems like that. However, that was back when I was in first grade, and I didn't conclude I was being lied to when I was told that was the wrong way to do it.
@@Cerebrum123 There are many, many people on the spectrum and that's how we make new inventions, or ideas/ways for others to follow. Some are called geniuses, some brilliant, etc., but just spectrum is not enough to make an error - there must be the lack of self-monitoring and abudance of a narcissist trait to it giving the outcome of a prototypical Dannig-Kruger effect. In short - a nut case.
This isn't autism it's schizophrenia
Why not both?
@@jtem9313 my comment was deleted for saying it's not aut it's schiz
*throws Mac* "where are all the files?" - Hansel
Terrance use of language to "explain" his "theory" reminds me of flat earth wackjobs. They do the same thing.
Flat earthers are way worse. They deny math, gravity, physics, every science known to man, history and observable reality itself.
Except that Terrence isn’t a flat earther and flat earthers think Terrence is crazy lmao. They’re both insane
@@VonJay different brand of crazy
Are you more or less crazy when another crazy person calls you out?
Or is that just rival wings of the ward having a beef?
lol yeah, I noticed that too.
It doesn't surprise me to see Terrence Howard saying this sh*t. Considering how he treated his first wife and that time he attacked a flight attendant just because she asked him not to get up when the seatbelt sign was on, it's clear that he's not the brightest lightbulb in the asylum. 😅
Being a violent drunk immediately conflates to far left intentional propaganda against western society? Ok.
I read an article about his second or third wife-his most recent one-said their relationship lacked romance. They never went out to dinner or had romantic evenings because she was constantly helping him cut out plastics for his models. He was obsessed with his theories and ideas, and his narcissistic behavior meant they never went anywhere. She spent so much time indoors helping him that she now believes she has agoraphobia. Their house was filled with plastics, and her life revolved around cutting out shapes for his models. After their divorce, which was finalized three to five years ago, she is now supposedly engaged *to him* again. It’s an unbelievable story!
That's not important. Einstein cheated his wife with his first cousin, later married her . And was very abusive as well. Gandhi was sleeping with underage little girls. Nobody did nothing about it. My point is someone can be genius in mathematics, chemistry, biology, etc,... But awful as a person.
@@Ameenah69 It's not just believable, that sort of nonsense the norm in Hollyweird.
Quite frankly I'd rather have Hollywood actors invent goofy bullshit math theories than do unspeakable things to children.
He's the sharpest crayon in the newsstand.
The saddest part is Neil degraded Tyson took him seriously and explain̈Ed in detail why he was wrong after reading the paper itself and he took it as an attack
Considering that a high degree of narcissism combined with strong conspiracy and persecution phantasies almost amounts to the status of a mental illness I would rather leave a person like Howard alone and just ignore him instead of feeding his... mental state. But I guess the damage has already been done.
In other words "Terrence Howard doesn't know what words mean, so he gets everything wrong."
Him being a product of a modern education system that has a philosophy of ever changing definitions. What else do you expect?
@@Manco65 Most people are a product of modern education and you would agree that most of us know the basic math that Terrence gets wrong.
@@ne0nmancer Let me try to respond how Terrence Howard would. "What do you mean product? Do you see a barcode on my forehead? Do you see a discount tag on my caller? I am not a product because I am not for sale by retailer."
He is trying to make money. Creates controversy. Writes a book. Sells a book. Makes money. Millions of books sold means millions of dollars for him.
I would watch that show. Adult swim vibes.
Me: Dude, he's not arguing math, he's arguing semantics
Metatron: His problem isn't with math, it's a Language issue
Me: METATRON GETS ME!!
That was obvious to anyone with a high school education, tbh.
@@bigguy7353 Yeah, a lot of us thought that but I don't think anyone has talked about it publicly till now.
Math is semantics. Semantics he doesn't understand.
Yes, but at the same time, he wants to change the rules of math, _based_ on those semantics.
basic common sense, congratulations.
He got fired from the iron man films cuz he said the iron man repulsor blasts doesnt sound the same as it does in the cartoons
Terrance is the greatest mind since Einstein .
Over 10 years ago, when Terrence Howard was replaced in the Iron Man franchise, he was already insane and Terryology was already born. The man's original "theory" started because he couldn't conceive how 1+1=2 but 1x1 didn't equal 2. The man doesn't understand the simple difference between addition and multiplication.
He's a certified lunatic who lost a lucrative position in the Iron Man franchise by apparently demanding he get paid basically the same as the actor for Iron Man himself and wanting to spread the word of Terryology on set.
Also, why he didn't call it Terrencology instead, I will never understand.
I call it Methmetrics.
Wait. Dude who has serious problem with maths can tell if someone is getting paid more or less? How is that even possible?
But aside of that, it farther explains, why leftist kids are so dumb.
I think I figured him out. He’s dyslexic and thinks the + is an x and vice versa.
Terrance was offered for Iron man 2 a fraction of what he was offered for Iron man. Your stories about what was going on on set might have something to do with it. Also Don Cheadle was a batter actor and asked for less than half of what Howard for on Iron man 1.
I doubt they planned to pay him less for iron man 2 without any reason. Probably he would have had a lot less screen time in the sequel or other things were at play. He was probably insufferable and the production didn't consider his presence as important. Iron man was a giant hit, I don't buy the narrative in which the production played dirty. Imagine paying for having this clown around.
Terryology sounds like an obscure Yu-Gi-Oh card.
The art has an intense looking scientist running an advanced program with the result: 1×1=2
Or something from an Un- set in Magic.
It’s a trap card
@@ZaZaZoo22 and when its played, your opponent is sent to the Shadow Realm with every apple!
....that renders Exodia useless if you somehow manage to get the ultra rare 5th piece because 1+1+1+1+1= the ∆ acronym of π% {3°}...not 5.
But not always in that sequence, order and chaos aren't mutually exclusive basically.
Somebody showed him a party math trick and bro thought he’d unlocked a secret to the universe
He really lost the plot after he got kicked off Ironman, didn't he.
I don't have any degree of hostility towards Howard, I just think he has a problem and needs some help.
How do you deflate such an ego? If a pin is required for a balloon, this guy needs a harpoon.
Also why i dont like watching these videos because they add nothing constructive once you see a single one.
I agree
I can get a degree in hostility ? Which college ? I could challenge that course right now ! lol
@@I_am_Diogenes I don't see any mistake in my sentence.
He must be horribly scared of a „running nose“😂
where's it running off to????....
Well it’s still in the universe so he still has a nose
Because the noses are running everything? 🤡
@@siekensou77Nobody nose.
That man also really be scared by the holiday spirit...😂
The original languages when added up are wholesome with 369 not the English language
IRON MAN 2 math...
Hey Terrence, what's 2x0 equal?
Your paycheck.
1 * 1 is basically saying one group of one. Which will never equal two.
I am me, myself and I. Terryology’s linguistic premise clearly demonstrates that I am in fact three people. Case closed.
I’m wondering if he thinks 1x2=3, 1x3=4 and so on? I don’t think he understands that multiplication is shorthand for addition. A way of counting multiples.
He watched a 5 minute video about the first rule of thermodynamics, then got confused that he had an extra finger when working out the 1 times table.
"if you had one healing potion in a game and use it, how many potions do youhave left?" would've been better than the apple thingy, but Terry would've said some shit like "because I drank it it's in my body and therefore I still have one" like an actual raving lunatic.
The apple was a perfectly fine analogy.
Howard is an idiot.
His implication is in fact that you have all apples at all times, which is asinine.
It's one of those things idiots say to appear deep and in tune, when in fact it's all just dumb.
An argument that would go on and on. If I rebutted that with:
"Yes, you drank the potion and it's in you, but technically it is no longer the potion due to the chemical changes going through the digestive system. So no---you don't have the 'potion' as it were, because NOTHING remains as it was once digested."
Then he would say: "But technically the potion is part of the chemicals in your digestive system, so it's still a potion..."
This is called "circular reasoning fallacy". And the foundation of "Terryology" is that. As long as the potion exists in ANY form, it's still a potion.
I'll have to try it with my GM next week and see if he allows it.
I was gonna make the same joke but you beat me to it.
It still works with an apple if you say that you ate it.
Though I wonder...if I went and stole his car and sold it, could I still claim to him that he didn't really lose it as it's still there in spirit?
What's frightening is that he might actually go for it.
@@yvonnewilson2242 it's more of a "moving the goal posts" fallacy
that was the most diplomatic and yet odly charismatic way of calling some one ignorant.
Who knew that the solution to cold fusion, faster than light travel, self-replicating nanites, male pattern balding and erectile dysfunction could all be solved by simply just agreeing that 1* 1 is equal to two
I was once baffled as to why Don Cheadle replaced him in MCU. Beyond the thing about the payment he demanded, he really has no place in Iron Man's life 😂
Cheadle is a far left line toe-er as well.
@@bigguy7353I think they all are. The ones that don't, don't get jobs.
MCU is trash since Iron Man 2.
They offered him a fraction of what he got from Iron man.
This is what he’s saying he’s saying that the language is broken which is incomplete there shouldn’t be words that mean the same thing…they created this launge which is not wholesome …hence the math also is trickery
We didn’t learn multiplication tables, we learned times tables. Maybe that’s just how we talked in Utah. But 1, 1 time is 1
In 3rd grade, it was "times tables" but later it was "multiplication tables". That's what I learned growing up in Utah.
You’re wrong
Perhaps if he used this wording he would get a more coherent answer
You don't call a group table.but it is what the × means
They were pretty much interchangeable terms when I was in school, we called it multiplication but we would say 9 times 9 when pronouncing the equation.
"In the end the Party would announce that two and two made five, and you would have to believe it. It was inevitable that they should make that claim sooner or later: the logic of their position demanded it." -George Orwell, Nineteen Eighty-Four
Which is why I believe (attn conspiracy theory!) that ppl like Howard are used to identify people willing to believe literally anything. Because those are the cornerstone of every violent revolt.
Lmao, Howard aint a party hes 1 rich loser in his own vaccum. Calm down
I dont understand any of his stuff because I barley understand the standard laws. But a lot of people are embarrassed by this dude.
I like to think of it as “ one group of one equals one”
I have a group of apples. There is one apple in this group. Which means there is only one.
I have two groups of apples. Each group has one, there are 2 apples.
There are 3 groups of apples. Each group has 3 apples. There are 9 apples
One off-topic story.
Terrence Howard acted in The Hunting Party with Richard Gere in Bosnia. A friend of mine was the assistant for him and Mr Gere. One day she called me to send her the contacts of music stores in my area, which would have some saxophones in store. I was a bit confused, I asked her if she was transfered into props department. She said no, but it was a long story. She said she bought all the saxophones in Bosnia and Croatia and she needed to find some more, quickly. Terrence Howard needed them, he gave a saxophone to every woman he f...ed.
If your wife or girlfriend has a saxophone, I would ask some questions....
LOL!
How yes no, sto bi rek'o legendarni Izet.
I can see it now. Terrance blowing on the sax and saying, "That's hydrogen, do you hear it! It's key of E! It's a bisexual note!"
@@Steve-ev6vx That's Terryfying!...yeah, pun intended.
all of them in croatia and bosnia? so potentially hundreds and hundreds? possibly nearly a thousand?
bs, terrence howard having time to meet, bring, have sex, finish up with a saxophone session and a place to fucking hold them all.
was she asking for music stores to buy a saxaphone for a girl terrence had sex with? yeah sure, but embellishing it into an economic boon for the saxophone industry in eastern europe is dumb
This is the kind of crap I used to come up with on mushrooms when I was a teenager and then wonder why it didn't seem as insightful the following morning. Its appears Mr Howard hasn't come down just yet.
Yup, Terrence has never been the same after that heroic dose lol...
And that’s how I invented tangential flight- waits for applause.
This why scholars say the English language is one of the hardest languages to learn.
The moment mr. Terriologius started asking his interviewers to define ''multiply'' you can already tell that this is all over him just misunderstanding an english word.
Oh, and Ugandan drone money.
if he eats one apple one time, that means he ate two apples 😂
Terryological diets keeping us big as heck
@@mcfarvo literally jesus
I have a plot of land 1 mile by 1 mile. When I told the city I owned 2 square miles they happily doubled my property tax. I guess Terry is right
If we use Terrence's way of thinking:
If he was locked up with no access to water (and tied up so he can't consume his own bodily fluids), he would still have access to water because they share the same universe. Even if he dies of dehydration, because it is physically impossible to reach a source of water - he still somehow has access. 😂😂😂
Terry is also complaining that the square root of something isn’t the shape of a square at all 📦 🤷🏽♀️
It's not the shape of a root either.
😄😆🤣
I'm not a mathematician not a scientist but every time I hear Terrence Howard speak about this ,the words bullsh*t n narcissist illuminates in my brain😂😂
Did he emphasize his self value to anyone that he wants to claim self significant above others he's just explaining some things that I even don't even know he didn't even force anyone to believe in him but the guy is thinking outside of the box
@@justinkurtrivera2315 you got to listen to him a lot more you'll start to see the arrogance and the narcissism come out , I had the same thoughts that you did when I first heard him speak and then I was like oh this is interesting! then I start listening to him more and I'm like nah this guy is suspect ! He's either just that much of a narcissist or he is just a intelligent nut job
@@justinkurtrivera2315 Not to be rude here justin, but the only type of person that cannot see the very obvious underlying narcissistic traits in terrance, are the uneducated people who actually think hes saying somthing of value because hes spitting out some big words that they dont personally understand. You said it yourself, you dont understand what hes saying, and yet you assume hes smart regardless, despite watching a video that details for you why hes wrong, your still here acting all bamboozled.
Id strongly encourage you to work on practicing some healthy skepticism. The ability to identify bullshit, understand the scientific method, distill misinformation, ect..
Terrance is not a genius...maybe watcu this video again if your still confused....or actually study some of the things you claim to not understand but choose to believe in regardless..
I object to the appropriation of the word Terryology... This can only ever be applied to the works of the greatest writer and philosopher of the Millennium Sir Terry Pratchett. And must occasionally be spelled Pterryology just to reference Pyramids.
All hail the vulture headed god of unexpected guests Hat.
As soon as he mispronounced Manganese I knew he was completely unqualified to teach anyone anything. Ah yes Mag-Na-Say my favirite element
Almost 19 minutes...just go:
"I have a bucket of lobsters, if I reach in one time a grab a lobster and put it on the table, how many lobsters did I put on the table?"
-One.
"If I do the same two more times, how many lobsters did I put on the table?"
-Three.
"So why are there only two lobsters on the table?"
-One is in the pot...I'm hungry...
I laugh EVERY TIME I hear "1x1=2" 😂😂😂 How does anyone in the room not just burst out laughing 🤣🤣🤣
To be fair, many conspiracies theories have turned out to be correct in more ways than one. It's just that Terrance's conspiracy theory is not.
Thank God Winston of 1984 didn't have the "2+2=5" scene with Howard. He sure would have got at least two legs broken 😅
Well in Russia 2+2 = 6
If mental gymnastics was a person:
At his Oxford presentation, Terrence Howard seemed completely mystified by the concept of "units" when it was explained to him by one of the students.