The multiverse

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 205

  • @christineliang4670
    @christineliang4670 4 ปีที่แล้ว +55

    Thank you for this video! Finally I found it. I translated David Deutsch's "The Fabric of Reality", 2 times, from English into Chinese. I love this guy. He speaks everything so clearly!

    • @rootsquare7907
      @rootsquare7907 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Did you read beginning of infinity, hands down book. Check that out.

    • @perpetual989
      @perpetual989 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Legend.

  • @xemy1010
    @xemy1010 8 ปีที่แล้ว +77

    We need _far_ more videos of this brilliant man!

  • @peanutbutterlover3667
    @peanutbutterlover3667 7 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    why havent i heard of this guy he explains everything so well so well. much better than many others!!! this is rocks

  • @thequantartist
    @thequantartist 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I'm learning so much from David Deutsch. He is such a clear thinker.

  • @ViktorMozarov
    @ViktorMozarov 8 ปีที่แล้ว +101

    Thanks to Sam Hartis interview I have discovered this brilliant mind.

    • @EricSeaholm
      @EricSeaholm 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Me as well. Love this guy

    • @MickShredLord
      @MickShredLord 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Me too!
      Sam often has some fantastic guests and conversations on his podcast.

    • @ashikpanigrahi
      @ashikpanigrahi 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Sam Harris

    • @paulwillisorg
      @paulwillisorg 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Deutsch thinks beauty is objective. That's interesting. And might undermine atheism a little.

    • @88_TROUBLE_88
      @88_TROUBLE_88 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ashikpanigrahi I was about to ask who the fuck is Sam hartis lol 😂

  • @nbme-answers
    @nbme-answers 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Release the unedited interview!! The world deserves unfiltered D.D.! Celebrate this man.

  • @jacderida
    @jacderida 5 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    3:36 "Well this is my office. I've never actually been here before." lmao
    Seriously though, David is awesome and I love this documentary.

    • @woxrocks
      @woxrocks 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Way ahead of his time

    • @KrishMunot
      @KrishMunot 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      WFH

  • @Rob060870
    @Rob060870 8 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    I found this absolutely fascinating.

  • @traich
    @traich 8 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    Deutsch is brilliant
    Thank you !

    • @EricSeaholm
      @EricSeaholm 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Indeed; seemingly the most

  • @jburchel
    @jburchel 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    His message is truly one of hope for all people, in a world that desperately needs it!

    • @patmoran5339
      @patmoran5339 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I agree and you might want to look at youtube video on monotony and novelty.

  • @prenuptials5925
    @prenuptials5925 5 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    That is one young David Deutsch

  • @Senazi08a
    @Senazi08a ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Indeed David and Sean Caroll are the greatest scientsts and thinkers in our lifetime! I watched the video more than 10 times and in slowmotion untill I understad what he said, but still have many questions to understand it better, then I bought his book Fabric of reality, will read it!

  • @saroshbharucha
    @saroshbharucha หลายเดือนก่อน

    What a brilliant man he is. So clear so succinct. Wish he lives on till a 100 atleast n continues his work.

  •  8 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    5:14 Blade Runner poster :P

  • @ferdinandocoluccelli9574
    @ferdinandocoluccelli9574 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    very good, incredibly interesting talk. We need to have a very open mind to accept new visions, but if we can do it our ideas about the world and ourselves may drastically change. Wonderful!

  • @Drjoshington
    @Drjoshington 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I love how as soon as the interviewer says it's bizarre, the camera cuts to the cluttered bookshelves for some good old fashioned character assasination.

  • @brogcooper25
    @brogcooper25 8 ปีที่แล้ว +57

    never has a book change the lens through which I see the world like 'the beginning of infinity' did when I read it 4 years ago and multiple times since

    • @HitomiAyumu
      @HitomiAyumu 8 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      Agreed. Absolutely marvelous book. I keep recommending it to people, but nobody seems to take me seriously.

    • @somethingness
      @somethingness 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Me too. It's my favourite nonfiction book.

    • @Scientist1642
      @Scientist1642 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@HitomiAyumu That's a third strong recommendation I found on different video comments. I might as well pull the trigger. Thanks.

    • @dailygrindism
      @dailygrindism ปีที่แล้ว +1

      thanks for mentioning it! will read it.

    • @ricomajestic
      @ricomajestic 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@dailygrindism His Fabric of Reality is better!

  • @danatreloar1840
    @danatreloar1840 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I've always believed in this- multiverse... As a child I fell from a 60' cliff down to a rock shelf below.. I remember it like it was yesterday- I had NO chance and just fell waking up in a miraculous pool of water- a ride pool just long enough and just deep enough to where all that happened was a broken arm that didn't make it in the pool. So I lived on... I then in my teen years develop a disease where drs were stumped and gave 48hrs of life left and sending me to CHLA where a rare disease specialist took over. I remember dying in the isolation room before leaving- kinda like sleep/coma only to "awaken" in the ambulance headed to LA where I went on to slowly make a miraculous recovery (long story). Lastly I had an accident in my 20s where skateboarding w friends we collided and I severely crushed the back of my head in. I again "awoke" in my friends truck as he drove me home. After making an odd comment my friend instead sped me to the ER where again I fell "asleep" only to "awaken" after a miraculous surgeon performed reconstruction on the back of my head on the gurney in that ER which had NO surgical center or ability... 3 miraculous events in the span of 20 years where I lived thru things absolutely improbable and impossible except for the fact that I'm still "here"... I'm 48yo and have battled over the probabilities of my survival thru those events. On paper it's impossible (especially the cliffs) yet in the multiverse it's absolutely possible as in those other universes I passed over into another universe where I lived thru it. I do have 1 NDE event within the time frame of my cranial crush but it wasn't the whole "light at the end of the tunnel" thing tho it definitely was a trip down a very dark dark tunnel where I remember knowing I was dying... That's a whole other story altogether tho.... But the multiverse is VERY real and effects everybody ALL the time. Just know for those who have lost friends and family to early "deaths" well in their universe they are still very much "alive" and probably still hanging out w you in that same friendship that you once cherished... Now "end of life" is part of a whole other dynamic of which I have NO clue and hopefully it is that time when all those life connections from the multiverse all come together in a singular yet "other worldly" system of reality called "end of life"... Who knows??? Just believe and know that there is a multiverse!

    • @David.C.Velasquez
      @David.C.Velasquez 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks taking the time to post your comment. I too have had similar experiences, that I have "lived" through, but I won't bother listing them. Have you considered dreams, as another way to glimpse these other possible versions of our lives? If you've ever "died" in a dream, it's almost the same sensation, waking into this life and thanking our stars that it wasn't "really" us. I suspect when we do actually die in this world, we will wake to find that this all had been the dream, a fleeting entanglement of minds in temporary superposition. Dreaming may be the most important thing humans do, but we are conditioned to dismiss them as unreal fantasy or random noise with no importance, except to charlatans with their interpreted symbolism. I've lived so many lives in dreams, usually different to this one to some varying degree. Some, where you could weep at the loss upon waking, only to slowly fade until only a piece remains, wherever in our brains that we store fragments of lost dreams.

    • @draknash
      @draknash 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Those are amazing experiences, and maybe they are evidence of the multiverse. I’ve struggled to understand for decades a similar experience I had at age 17, when drunk I stumbled in front of a car on the highway. Somehow I escaped with barely a scratch but the entire front quarter panel on the car was totaled. My thigh was struck and my foot was run over but it was if the car passed through my body without pushing me forward. I can remember hearing ambulance sirens as I limped away into the woods. The first person I saw that night after this event I fell in love with at first sight and have never gotten over. After reading a notice printed in the local paper, I contacted the police and found out they had had dogs looking for my body in the woods. Just the strangest night of my life and sometimes I’m waiting for this loop to end and to end up back there at that moment, like the Donnie Darko movie.

  • @joegeorge7168
    @joegeorge7168 5 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Wow talk about entropy look at that office.

  • @espedairs7901
    @espedairs7901 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Mind-blowing stuff! This vid is very underrated

  • @jaggerlags
    @jaggerlags 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I love this man and am only discovering him right now.

  • @Kalumbatsch
    @Kalumbatsch 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It's great to find this material here.

  • @terrywbreedlove
    @terrywbreedlove 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    He has such a clear easy way of explaining these very strange things.

  • @patriciaragland1286
    @patriciaragland1286 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Enjoyed this video. Mr. DEUTSCH MADE IT EASY TO UNDERSTAND.

  • @gnanasekarjayaraj2144
    @gnanasekarjayaraj2144 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This man just told the script of Multiverse of Madness many years ago

  • @piehound
    @piehound ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Bachelor of Arts here majoring in physics 1972. My comment is . . . OH shyt . . . Yeah !!!! With a deep sigh. Thanks for an enjoyable video. BTW i was peeling garlic while listening.

  • @traich
    @traich 8 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Do you have an idea what year is this ?
    I can clearly see that it is filmed prior to the publishing of the fabric of reality (1997) but that's about it.
    Applause to the dutchies for interviewing him. Such an underrated mind

    • @despectable
      @despectable  8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +stefan klisarov Oh yes, this is an old one. Personally I saw this a long time ago. However, this should be from 1995, as you can see here: teleblik.nl/media/7657
      It was orginally published from "Noorderlicht" and the title was "Het Multiversum" if I recall correctly.

  • @ChrisOrillia
    @ChrisOrillia ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is a gem !

  • @aloevera7422
    @aloevera7422 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Many Worlds Interpretation is consilient with the mindset that you are more powerful than you think. If you honestly pursue the explanation that “all physically possible things happen” then there is no reason why your dreams cannot be realized.

  • @cardquest2118
    @cardquest2118 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So the multiverse is the set of all chess games where any particular universe is an individual game of chess (like a branching decision tree), how fun.

  • @malikrahman8649
    @malikrahman8649 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Watched this twice today

  • @Automobiliana
    @Automobiliana 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Utterly fascinating

  • @pcorteen
    @pcorteen 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I've watched this several times now: great music, ideas from a great mind. There may be ghosts afterall!

  • @MaxMBJ
    @MaxMBJ 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The other Me’s need to see this. Would explain a lot.

  • @MicahBuzanANIMATION
    @MicahBuzanANIMATION 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It almost looks like it's more work to keep that book shelf so messy than to just have the book sitting up right.

  • @kavish2307
    @kavish2307 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So beautiful ❤️

  • @vtrandal
    @vtrandal 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Somehow I feel like this multiverse multiplies my suffering. But then there are copies me that would disagree.

  • @hughjarrse
    @hughjarrse 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Nearly a quarter of a century on and most of us still don't get it

  • @jps0117
    @jps0117 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Evidently Jordan Peterson never told him to clean his room.

    • @Nikolai0007
      @Nikolai0007 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😂😂😂

  • @xit1254
    @xit1254 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    At 21:57 "Is the multi-universe theory testable?" It seems to me that the interference experiment IS a test of the multiverse theory. After all, SOMETHING is causing the interference. Also, if quantum computers become feasible, SOMETHING is doing the classically impossible calculations.

  • @YanusDV
    @YanusDV 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    lol at the dramatic beginning. In a good way ofc. Damn!! David plays the piano. Awesome

  • @TrappedinaBrain
    @TrappedinaBrain 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The more I study the double slit experiment the less I understand it

  • @nbme-answers
    @nbme-answers 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    they don't make tv like this any more

  • @youngjezy23
    @youngjezy23 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love the multiverse theory I mean imagining different worlds than this is amazing

    • @higreentj
      @higreentj 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      We would be moving through the multiverse and branching off into different futures. The future is open and the past fixed so the past is other universes. th-cam.com/video/zhQBa7gJkww/w-d-xo.html

  • @steviejd5803
    @steviejd5803 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Excellent explanation

  • @spedc
    @spedc 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I just want to know, if all the universes exist at the same time, how can i bridge the gap between them and travel to another time line? I absolutely LOVE his references to Dr. Who. I have watched Dr. Who since the 70's (yes, millenials, Dr. Who did NOT start in 2005!) and I have enjoyed Dr. Who and really wanted to know if that would ever be possible. if it would be possible to change to jump to another timeline.

  • @nbme-answers
    @nbme-answers 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    editing here very understated. lurv it.

  • @Speaktok
    @Speaktok 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    The music clips in this video are really good.

  • @AlainG80
    @AlainG80 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    There are actually multiple explanations of quantum mechanics. And the process of elimination requires quantum computers. This was 1995, and better explanations exist now, but none have ruled out Everett.

  • @dang8651
    @dang8651 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'm convinced.

  • @nbme-answers
    @nbme-answers 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    8:46 and what we must conclude from this is that something is coming through, pushing our photon aside
    24:00 I don't think we ever understand a theory fully until we have the theory's successor

  • @zorashoes6482
    @zorashoes6482 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    my filing system is my floor haha...david deutch is mentioned in avenger end game movie.

  • @atimetraveler4910
    @atimetraveler4910 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The double slit experiment always scared the shi outta me. Lol. Nature is fascinating, we barely know the true weirdness of reality.

  • @yeeesssssss
    @yeeesssssss ปีที่แล้ว +2

    if the pattern of photons is changed by invisible light from parallel universes. could we communicate with parallel universes by manipulating light emitted in our parallel universe to change their pattern? if I want to try this and there are multiple versions of me doing this. I should be able to get a different pattern everytime, no?

    • @johnyaxon__
      @johnyaxon__ ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Only on DМТ

    • @yeeesssssss
      @yeeesssssss ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ​@@johnyaxon__ what if DMT breaks the simulation and the things I see is just the light from all parallel universes without filter?

    • @johnyaxon__
      @johnyaxon__ ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@yeeesssssss could be

    • @David.C.Velasquez
      @David.C.Velasquez 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@yeeesssssss " what if DMT breaks the simulation and the things I see is just the light from all parallel universes without filter?"
      You are on the right track with this thought, at least at some level.

  • @thomasdonovan3580
    @thomasdonovan3580 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A beautiful mind.

  • @eenkjet
    @eenkjet 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Little confused in that I've heard of many worlds being attributed (Everett)
    but not multiverse. In the more sophisticated double-slit called the
    Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser, information is erased producing the wave
    pattern. According to Deutsch, this "universe" is erased rather than
    simply the path information. Has he spoken to this?

  • @o2807
    @o2807 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    felt like i've just watched a harry porter movie offcuts

  • @allidoiswinwin6364
    @allidoiswinwin6364 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Do u think this is wher deja vu comes about

  • @BANKO007
    @BANKO007 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Jordan Peterson suggests that people who hold forth on global economics are not to be considered competent if they can't even keep their room tidy. 16:50 seems to rebut that idea pretty solidly.

  • @robbierichards3911
    @robbierichards3911 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    does anybody know the music at the beginning. thanks

  • @bizzzzzzle
    @bizzzzzzle 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The point of having an office at the school is so your available to the students that pay a lot to be there....

  • @maxcarlsson8334
    @maxcarlsson8334 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    David is not only brilliant, but funny

  • @patrickgravel9261
    @patrickgravel9261 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wondering if the interence is caused by dark energy or dark matter or both.

  • @cardquest2118
    @cardquest2118 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    20:00 brilliant explanation

  • @mikebueno6379
    @mikebueno6379 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Classic

  • @clydecessna737
    @clydecessna737 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Our job is to get the fuck out of this man's way.

  • @tigertone1
    @tigertone1 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    the 12:00 is so real ...quantum jumping can lead you to meet the other copies of ourselves

    • @allidoiswinwin6364
      @allidoiswinwin6364 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      But what’s the point of that

    • @tigertone1
      @tigertone1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@allidoiswinwin6364 I depends on where you are in revelation of self .

  • @eatcarpet
    @eatcarpet 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I didn’t know he played the piano

  • @nbme-answers
    @nbme-answers 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    15:50 “if you want science merely to predict the outcome of experiments ...

  • @Babylon2060
    @Babylon2060 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Het means "the" in Dutch, so basically, just rearrange the letters and you get "the" in two different Germanic dialects. lol

  • @ricomajestic
    @ricomajestic 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    "The filing system is my floor"

  • @_John_Sean_Walker
    @_John_Sean_Walker 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Clean up our multiverse.

  • @geometron3646
    @geometron3646 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    So... 13:01 he goes and makes a cup of tea and explains in some he does and others he doesn't. So if the "arrow of time" goes from the past to the future from simpler to more complex is it fair to say that we're spawning multiple universes constantly from every atom's variation? This indeed would be mind-boggling and feels a very infinite set of universes in the multiverse...think how many variations there are just since he made that cup of tea 25 years ago. Or does SpaceTime not work like that?

    • @user-qf3lq4zj8g
      @user-qf3lq4zj8g 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      A single choice is not what makes up a new universe: the multiverse implies that despite the many variations created in each one, they all exist in a kind of parallelism, independently of any arrow of time. Creation or collapse of a single universe would imply an infinite increase or decrease in variations, i.e. it would de-synchronize the entire multiverse.

  • @El_Diablo_12
    @El_Diablo_12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Damn David Deutsch was a handsome young man

    • @El_Diablo_12
      @El_Diablo_12 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You, I didn’t expect to find you here 🙂 (for future: I’m reclining on couch eating pancheros)

  • @benjaminhope1524
    @benjaminhope1524 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great (although ends with a bit of inductive reasoning, something which David despises!)

  • @douglasw1545
    @douglasw1545 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Sam harris brought me here

  • @chunpangmo4076
    @chunpangmo4076 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    what is the piano music Dr. Deutsch plays? thanks

    • @despectable
      @despectable  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      moonlight sonata: adagio sostenuto, 1. Movement.
      th-cam.com/video/4Tr0otuiQuU/w-d-xo.html

    • @chunpangmo4076
      @chunpangmo4076 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@despectable thanks@@!!!!

  • @markgamble7699
    @markgamble7699 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Question, if one dies in it's Universe, will all the twins die in their Universes ???

  • @AKb00757
    @AKb00757 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    anyone know what music he's playing on the piano?

    • @despectable
      @despectable  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's Beethoven's moonlight sonata first set 'Adagio Sostenuto', one of the most famous classical piano pieces.

  • @oreocleo9129
    @oreocleo9129 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    even stupid annoying people have copies of themselves in other universes that really bothers me

  • @tranuc183
    @tranuc183 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    avenger-and game brought me here doctor.

  • @bossgd100
    @bossgd100 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why he reminds me kabuto in the anime naruto ?

  • @hobelgoblin4724
    @hobelgoblin4724 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    wow.

  • @KrwiomoczBogurodzicy
    @KrwiomoczBogurodzicy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    [05:11] _Blade Runner_ poster
    [15:43] We have to get used to the fact that new advances in science get further and further away from common sense. If you want science merely to predict the outcomes of experiments without telling you why, then you don't need to believe in multiple universes-in fact you don't believe need to believe in multiple planets. You don't need to believe that anything outside this room exists if you only want to predict. But if you want to _explain,_ then you must adopt the explanation which meets the facts. And in quantum mechanics there is only one explanation that meets the facts, and that is the multiple universes explanation. We can _see_ the behavior of things like photons being affected by things we can't see. Our only choice is to say it behaves as if it were affected by those or to say it really is affected by those. And it only makes sense to say it's really affected-because something that doesn't exist surely can't affect things that do exist.
    [16:45] Can I ask you a personal question? So [for] somebody who is busy with logic and mathematics and quantum theory, it looks rather messy around you.
    Yes. Well you have to remember this is my place of work. As you know I don't go to my office, so this is where work-I sit at my computer and write the book that I've been writing. And then when I'm working on other kinds of research, if I receive some papers, then my filing system is my floor but I know where everything is.

  • @JG27Korny
    @JG27Korny 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Only particles have copies of themselves in the different universes in the multiverse. We ourselves, the matter we see is an emergent property of the multiverse. As such the world we see is an emergent property of the multiverse itself. We are not multidimensional we are kind of multiverse beings. So there is just one copy of us that is the result of the emergent properties of the multiverse.

  • @MakeDemocracyMagnificientAgain
    @MakeDemocracyMagnificientAgain 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    what is a moment of choice on a microscopic level? (13:21)

    • @benjamindees
      @benjamindees 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It is called a wave-function collapse, decoherence or observation in other interpretations of QM.

  • @matycee
    @matycee 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    stopping Mr. Deutsch at the 10:30 mark to interject... that perhaps, he/they are wrong about all of it. Simple as that. I'm no expert(really?) but it seems to me that the astonishing conclusion that the entirety of a parallel universe, right there on the flip side of what we can physically perceive with our senses, is wholly dependent on the guess or assumption that the invisible force "bumping" photons to the side is all the evidence required of just that... An entire, alternate universe - replete with all the gigantic amount of stuff found within. And furthermore, that it is not evidence for a single alternate universe, but many. Infinite?
    I'm all for the many worlds/PU theory. It's super cool. But really, we've built an entire edifice of thought based on light interference? Seems too easy... there could be an entirely OTHER reason for this. And this, dear reader who stuck it out with me... is where I go get another beer.

  • @jean-pierredevent970
    @jean-pierredevent970 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    There is the book"The Secret" , New Age ideas from Deepak Chopra and others which seems to suggest that own choices cause us to navigate in the multiverse or perhaps our choices create new branches of the multiverse. This must seem very plausible to New Age fans and then you are responsible for the good or bad universe you end up in. Who knows it's true but what bothers me is that there must be multiple other selves making all the other choices and it puts enormous pressure on decision making when you really create your own reality. And the mind with "free will" seems that way to stand somewhere out of everything. I would like to know if this far fetched idea could be even be true "in theory".

    • @aloevera7422
      @aloevera7422 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      “I am becoming the best possible version of myself.” - Matthew Kelly

  • @Daniel-xi4bo
    @Daniel-xi4bo 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    greetings froom brazzzillll

  • @nbme-answers
    @nbme-answers 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    6:43 double slit

  • @allidoiswinwin6364
    @allidoiswinwin6364 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I still don’t get it

  • @Locrian08
    @Locrian08 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    The collapse of wave functions as a result of potential interaction with any part of the wave function also fits QM. Why Deutsch finds this harder to accept than that these nearly infinitely branching universes exist and can interact with each other baffles me. The convention of parsimony nudges us toward the collapsing wave function view.

    • @ab-nm6xi
      @ab-nm6xi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Both are bogus. Collapsing wave requires probability theory, which is an approximation model of reality, not the reality itself. Multiverse requires no probability (everything happens for sure in at least one universe) but requires a huge leap of untestable faith.

    • @pcorteen
      @pcorteen 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Wave interference can be demonstrated by pushing water through 2 gaps but where light is concerned what is propagating the waves? We should not believe that there are multiple universes around us, instead we should look for a better explanation and hold the multiverse idea under consideration, exciting and incredible as it is.

  • @christopherbell4543
    @christopherbell4543 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence 🤔

    • @johnnuaxon3
      @johnnuaxon3 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Imagine a Parameter space of ALL possible DNA. Why do you have your DNA? Because you are just a single variant of the whole DNA parameter space. You have certain parameters: colour, shape, size, instincts etc.
      #parameter_space

  • @pereriktinfors
    @pereriktinfors 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    🎶💎💎💎💎💎✨🎶

  • @emrek99205
    @emrek99205 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A question that I'm sure will never get to him to be answered is what happens to the conservation of matter/energy/information if multiple versions of yourself did the so called time travel and all arrived in the same universe? The universes that the collective "you" left would have minimal difference, but the destination universe would have a massive (no pun intended) addition. That universe (with the extra yous) would be so different from its neighbors (without any yous) that comparing them would be near impossible.

  • @youngjezy23
    @youngjezy23 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    When we die we visit parallel universes

    • @pedrodcu
      @pedrodcu ปีที่แล้ว

      where's the proof ??

    • @youngjezy23
      @youngjezy23 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@pedrodcu we don’t need proof everything is obvious too see

    • @pedrodcu
      @pedrodcu ปีที่แล้ว

      @@youngjezy23 is that the Royal "we" ??

    • @youngjezy23
      @youngjezy23 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@pedrodcu yes 👍

  • @georgeR3Roadster
    @georgeR3Roadster 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    but when you believe in the theory that we are all ONE and that in the spiritual world there is NO time at all (no past no futur, all at the same one moment, the NOW !!) then you realise that "there" we are in all universes at the same "time" moment of the "NOW" too .... we only start to "split" in one universe of matter as material bodies/beings when we are born while our spiritual being, our soul (of Light - as christian) keeps being in all universes together at the same "time" of the NOW ... infinite possibilities, just one outcome/decision here, up there all possibilities and all outcomes .... but annihilating themselves in just one infinite loophole .... so our SOUL (spirit) (quantum consciousness) and our souls together are the sum of all the universes in the NOW but our body of matter is the way we walk into one or another of the different universes .... free will !!! I go left ? I go right ? in fact we do not even move ..... we just ARE in all universes together but we think we are separate because we always focus on just one split ray of light or life or movement in this matter-world instead of being aware of the whole bunch of light around .... Light is EVERYWHERE ALWAYS !!! Christ is everywhere ! you cann't have just one photon ..... can you see Christ ?? no but He is ALL LIGHT we yet cann't see .... so much as you cann't see LOVE ! So there must be 2 kinds of light : the light we see in the material world (traveling at a certain speed C ) and the for us not yet to be seen invisible spiritual LIGHT infinite present everywhere and interacting somehow with our known sunlight .....

  • @Handlingcharge
    @Handlingcharge 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please somebody answer why light is assumed to be a particle?

  • @Handlingcharge
    @Handlingcharge 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    But if it is a wave, not a particle? Why must the photon be a particle?

  • @georgeR3Roadster
    @georgeR3Roadster 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    the successor of quantum theory will be the SOUL theory, the level of the permanent infinite NOW ... (explaining quantum entanglment etc ...) ... that has the consciousness (quantum) to, by totally free will, split away into another downgraded "vibration" (with past or futur and inherent timeline ..).