How many ulema have been locked up by the government. Thats the question... Arw they all khawaarij. Or the best of mujaahideen who speak a word of truth against an oppressive ruler
@@hafismuhammed2712 Muawiya rebelled (did khurooj) on two Rightly Guided Caliphs of his time, Ali(r) and Hasan(r), no Muslim should have love for praise for such an evil man.
@@أفلاكالأفكارAuuthibillah. May Allah Subhana Wa Tala guide you or break your back. Ameen. You've lied against the great sahabi who spread this Deen far for the sake of Allah Subhana Wa Tala. Please learn the history, and fear Allah for everything you say will be used against you. You have 2 angels writing down everything you say, and type.
@@7asan_r I don't respect people who waged civil wars against Two Rightly Guided Caliphs, especially when Ali(RA) made dua against Mu'awiya in Musannaf ibn Abi Shaybah: حدثنا هشيم، قال: أخبرنا حصين، قال: حدثنا عبد الرحمن بن مغفل [كذا، والصحيح: معقل] ، قال: صليت مع عليٍّ صلاة الغداة، قال: فقنت فقال في قنوته: اللهم عليك بمعاوية وأشياعه، وعمرو بن العاص وأشياعه، وأبي الأعور السلمي وأشياعه، وعبد الله بن قيس وأشياعه. Mu'awiya made war against Ali(RA), who is the Mawla of the Mu'mineen according to the mutawatir hadith and made war against Hasan(RA), who is one of the Sayyids of the youth of paradise according to the hadith in Bukhari and you expect me to respect him? Ali(RA) made dua against Mu'awiya, so I have no problem following my master Ali(RA), the spiritual brother of our Prophet(pbuh)
You got it backwards, scholars were the rulers during Rashidun Caliphate. The sahaba who ruled like Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman, and Ali RA were pretty much hafiz in Quran with the best understanding and knew probably all of the Sunnah at its peak. They were literally peak in terms of knowledge, I am pretty sure if scholars were appointed as rulers instead of people within family, we wouldn’t be having this issue
May Allah (SWT) guide Fawzan, he is very negative person, something is wrong with his thinking. May Allah guide him, as he doesn't act like a respectful person.
Hadith "حَدَّثَنَا رَاشِدُ بْنُ سَعِيدٍ الرَّمْلِيُّ، حَدَّثَنَا الْوَلِيدُ بْنُ مُسْلِمٍ، حَدَّثَنَا حَمَّادُ بْنُ سَلَمَةَ، عَنْ أَبِي غَالِبٍ، عَنْ أَبِي أُمَامَةَ، قَالَ عَرَضَ لِرَسُولِ اللَّهِ ـ صلى الله عليه وسلم ـ رَجُلٌ عِنْدَ الْجَمْرَةِ الأُولَى فَقَالَ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ أَىُّ الْجِهَادِ أَفْضَلُ فَسَكَتَ عَنْهُ فَلَمَّا رَأَى الْجَمْرَةَ الثَّانِيَةَ سَأَلَهُ فَسَكَتَ عَنْهُ فَلَمَّا رَمَى جَمْرَةَ الْعَقَبَةِ وَضَعَ رِجْلَهُ فِي الْغَرْزِ لِيَرْكَبَ قَالَ " أَيْنَ السَّائِلُ " . قَالَ أَنَا يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ قَالَ " كَلِمَةُ حَقٍّ عِنْدَ ذِي سُلْطَانٍ جَائِرٍ " ." It was narrated that Abu Umamah said: “A man came to the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) at the first pillar and said: ‘O Messenger of Allah, which Jihad is best?’ but he kept quiet. When he saw the second Pillar, he asked again, and he kept quiet. When he stoned ‘Aqabah Pillar, he placed his foot in the stirrup, to ride, and said: ‘Where is the one who was asking?’ (The man) said: ‘Here I am, O Messenger of Allah.’ He said: *‘A word of truth spoken to an unjust ruler.’”* ( حضرت ابوامامہ رضی اللہ عنہ سے روایت ہے کہ ایک آدمی پہلے جمرے کے قریب رسول اللہ ﷺ کے سامنے آیا اور کہا : اللہ کے رسول ! کون سا جہاد افضل ہے ؟ آپ خاموش رہے ۔ جب آپ دوسرے جمرے پر پہنچے تو اس نے ( پھر ) سوال کیا ۔ آپ خاموش رہے ۔ پھر جب آپ نے جمرۂ عقبہ ( بڑے جمرے ) پر کنکریاں ماریں اور سوار ہونے کے لیے رکاب میں پاؤں رکھا تو فرمایا :’’ سوال کرنے والا کہاں ہے ؟‘‘ اس نے کہا : اللہ کے رسول ! میں ہوں ۔ آپ نے فرمایا :*’’ ظالم سلطان کے سامنے کلمۂ حق کہنا ( افضل جہاد ہے* ۔‘‘ ) Sunan Ibn e Majah#4012 فتنوں سے متعلق احکام و مسائل Status: صحیح) Sunan Ibn Majah, 4012 In-Book Reference: Book 36, Hadith 87 English Reference: Vol. 5, Book 36, Hadith 4012 Get Hadith Collection (All in one) App gtaf.org/apps/hadith #GreentechApps #Hadith
Allah knows the difference between the righteous scholars and the scholars for dollars. If their advice is supported by Qur'an and Sunnah, Alhamdulillah but if it's not , we must ignore it. I saw one scholar say that saudi is killing the Yemeni in self defense and they are collateral damage Astagfirullah and another saying that the boycott of companies or countries that are killing our Palestinian Brothers and Sisters is Haram Astagfirullah. Insha'Allah they will need to answer to Allah, as will all of us.
Criticizing the Muslim rulers is forbidden according to the sunnah and salaf. You say you take Quran and sunnah right? Then read early athari Creed books which usually reference this.
@@ozone2126But why did Salman Al Farisi (RA) blatantly asked Umar (RA) about his dress in public and Umar answered his question he said now we will obey and listen to you
No, if scholars become lapdogs of government, they will lose their status, their independence and will not criticize their govts. Like what is happening in Saudi, Iran Turkey. Why our imams like Shafi, Malik, Hanifa refused to serve government. The statement by the Molvi, is nothing but fascist thinking.
Hadith أَخْبَرَنَا هَارُونُ بْنُ إِسْحَاقَ، قَالَ حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدٌ، - يَعْنِي ابْنَ عَبْدِ الْوَهَّابِ - قَالَ حَدَّثَنَا مِسْعَرٌ، عَنْ أَبِي حَصِينٍ، عَنِ الشَّعْبِيِّ، عَنْ عَاصِمٍ الْعَدَوِيِّ، عَنْ كَعْبِ بْنِ عُجْرَةَ، قَالَ خَرَجَ إِلَيْنَا رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم وَنَحْنُ تِسْعَةٌ خَمْسَةٌ وَأَرْبَعَةٌ أَحَدُ الْعَدَدَيْنِ مِنَ الْعَرَبِ وَالآخَرُ مِنَ الْعَجَمِ فَقَالَ " اسْمَعُوا هَلْ سَمِعْتُمْ أَنَّهُ سَتَكُونُ بَعْدِي أُمَرَاءُ مَنْ دَخَلَ عَلَيْهِمْ فَصَدَّقَهُمْ بِكَذِبِهِمْ وَأَعَانَهُمْ عَلَى ظُلْمِهِمْ فَلَيْسَ مِنِّي وَلَسْتُ مِنْهُ وَلَيْسَ يَرِدُ عَلَىَّ الْحَوْضَ وَمَنْ لَمْ يَدْخُلْ عَلَيْهِمْ وَلَمْ يُصَدِّقْهُمْ بِكَذِبِهِمْ وَلَمْ يُعِنْهُمْ عَلَى ظُلْمِهِمْ فَهُوَ مِنِّي وَأَنَا مِنْهُ وَسَيَرِدُ عَلَىَّ الْحَوْضَ " . It was narrated that Kab bin Ujrah said: "The Messenger of Allah came out to us and we were nine, fie and four, some 'Arabs and some non- 'Arabs. He said: 'Listen. Have you heard that after me *there will be rulers, whoever enters upon them and believes their lies and help them in their wrongdoing is not of me, and I am not of him,* and he will not come to me at the Cistern? Whoever does not enter upon them or belive their lies or help them in their wrongdoing is of me and I am of him, and he will come to me at the Cistern."' Sahih (Darussalam) (حضرت کعب بن عجرہ رضی اللہ عنہ بیان کرتے ہیں کہ رسول اللہ ﷺ ہمارے پاس تشریف لائے ۔ ہم نو آدمی تھے ۔ پانچ عربی ، چار عجمی یا چار عربی اور پانچ عجمی ۔ آپ نے فرمایا :*’’ سنو ! کیا تم سن رہے ہو ؟ یقیناً میرے ( فوت ہونے کے ) بعد کچھ ایسے امیر ہوں گے کہ جو شخص ان کے پاس جائے گا ، پھر ان کے جھوٹ میں ان کی تصدیق کرے گا ، اور ان کے ظلم میں ان کا ساتھ دے گا ، نہ اس کا مجھ سے تعلق ہے اور نہ میرا اس سے ۔ اور وہ میرے پاس حوض کوثر پر نہیں آ سکے گا ۔* اور جو شخص ان کے پاس نہ گیا ( یا گیا لیکن ) ان کے جھوٹ کی تصدیق نہ کی اور ظلم میں ان کا ساتھ نہ دیا ، وہ میرا ہے ۔ میں اس کا ہوں اور وہ ضرور میرے پاس حوض کوثر پر حاضری کی سعادت حاصل کرے گا ۔‘‘ ) Sunan Nasai#4213 کتاب: بیعت سے متعلق احکام و مسائل Sunan an-Nasa'i, 4208 In-Book Reference: Book 39, Hadith 60 English Reference: Vol. 5, Book 39, Hadith 4213 Get Hadith Collection (All in one) App gtaf.org/apps/hadith #GreentechApps #Hadith
@@-------....___ Where did MBS declare that something haram is halal? I'm waiting for an answer. And MBS isn't my god. Watch your filthy kharijite mouth.
Hadith "حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ بَشَّارٍ، حَدَّثَنَا غُنْدَرٌ، حَدَّثَنَا شُعْبَةُ، عَنْ زُبَيْدٍ، عَنْ سَعْدِ بْنِ عُبَيْدَةَ، عَنْ أَبِي عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ، عَنْ عَلِيٍّ ـ رضى الله عنه ـ أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ صلى الله عليه وسلم بَعَثَ جَيْشًا وَأَمَّرَ عَلَيْهِمْ رَجُلاً، فَأَوْقَدَ نَارًا وَقَالَ ادْخُلُوهَا. فَأَرَادُوا أَنْ يَدْخُلُوهَا، وَقَالَ آخَرُونَ إِنَّمَا فَرَرْنَا مِنْهَا، فَذَكَرُوا لِلنَّبِيِّ صلى الله عليه وسلم فَقَالَ لِلَّذِينَ أَرَادُوا أَنْ يَدْخُلُوهَا " لَوْ دَخَلُوهَا لَمْ يَزَالُوا فِيهَا إِلَى يَوْمِ الْقِيَامَةِ ". وَقَالَ لِلآخَرِينَ " لاَ طَاعَةَ فِي مَعْصِيَةٍ، إِنَّمَا الطَّاعَةُ فِي الْمَعْرُوفِ "." Narrated `Ali: The Prophet (ﷺ) , sent an army and appointed some man their commander The man made a fire and then said (to the soldiers), "Enter it." Some of them intended to enter it while some others said, 'We have run away from it (i.e., embraced Islam to save ourselves from the 'fire')." They mentioned that to the Prophet, and he said about people who had intended to enter the fire. *''If they had entered it, they would have remained In it till the Day of Resurrection.'' Then he said to others, "No obedience for evil deeds, obedience is required only in what is good ."* ( نبی کریم ﷺ نے ایک لشکر بھیجا اور اس کا امیر ایک صاحب عبداللہ بن حذافہ سہمی کو بنایا ، پھر ( اس نے کیا کیا کہ ) آگ جلوائی اور ( لشکریوں سے ) کہا کہ اس میں داخل ہو جاؤ ۔ جس پر بعض لوگوں نے داخل ہونا چاہا لیکن کچھ لوگوں نے کہا کہ ہم آگ ہی سے بھاگ کر آئے ہیں ۔ پھر اس کا ذکر آنحضرت ﷺ سے کیا تو آپ نے ان سے فرمایا ، جنہوں نے آگ میں داخل ہونے کا ارادہ کیا تھا کہ *اگر تم اس میں داخل ہو جاتے تو اس میں قیامت تک رہتے ۔ اور دوسرے لوگوں سے کہا کہ اللہ تعالیٰ کی نافرمانی میں کسی کی اطاعت حلال نہیں ہے اطاعت صرف نیک کاموں میں ہے ۔)* Sahih al-Bukhari, 7257 In-Book Reference: Book 95, Hadith 12 USC-MSA web (English) reference: Vol. 9, Book 91, Hadith 363 (deprecated numbering scheme) Get Hadith Collection (All in one) App gtaf.org/apps/hadith #GreentechApps #Hadith
May Allah bless the Shaykh. The false propaganda against the righteous scholars is done to take people away from their guidance and advice. Moreover they can’t even prove it if asked to. This allegation is only based on the whims and desires.
@@AnaAtharidon't get too much in a debate with him I've made that mistake and ended up getting about 30 comment from the dude and he also won't stop accusing us of grave worshipping idk where he got that from.
Sheikh Salih Al Fawzan is right حفظه الله, we all make mistakes and are imperfect so are our leaders, we pray for their guidance and ours. And according to Ibn Abbas رَضِيَ ٱللَّٰهُ عَنْهُ this time of kufr doesn’t take u out of deen
You are wrong. Legislating on muslim land, making permissible what Allah SWT has made impermissible is not kufr duna kufr. It is kufr. You seem like a Saudi paid bot. Otherwise you wouldn't say things like this.
@@Ahmad0609 replacing sharia is not a mistake ya madkhali murji'a. What was the context when Ibn Abbas said that. Was it when the people used that ayah to make takfir of sinners, or did they use that ayah to make takfir of taghut?
@@-------....___ they’re two types of situations here as Ahmad Ibn hanbal رَحِمَهُ ٱللَّٰهُ said and Ibn Taymiyyah mentioned in Majmu Al Fatwa, one who commits the haram but he knows it’s haram and the one who commits the haram and says it’s halal, one is Kufr Akbar (the latter) and the other is Kufr but it doesn’t take u out of Islam
Scholars had done the best ever possible. If it's true by criticizing the rulers and they find it is in accordance to the teaching of the prophet, then they would issue the fatawa for doing so.
He was the first sheikh to speak about riyadh season and muscial concerts though so stop lying on his name He says what they are doing buying players for these huge sums is haram so again is he an agent if mbs . Please dont talk without knowledge
This is interesting in another recording this scholar clarifies that a ruler rhsf doesn’t judge by the rule of Allah has committed kuffar I just think they don’t want to get locked up
These ignoramuses in the comment section who base their opinions and criteria rooted in alien, non Islamic methodologies really is like a knife to the eyes. May Allâh give us ḥidāyah
Surah al ahzab ayah 66 to 68 speaks about the shuyook of the rulers and those who follow them and there disobedience and misguidance The Day their faces will be turned about in the Fire, they will say, "How we wish we had obeyed Allāh and obeyed the Messenger." And they will say, "Our Lord, indeed we obeyed our masters and our dignitaries,[1] and they led us astray from the [right] way. Our Lord, give them double the punishment and curse them with a great curse."
Wow a scholar and he’s only answer to the topic is accusing everyone that has doubt in todays scholars and institutes as Khawarij, doesn’t make that him even a way bigger Khawarij 😂😂 may Allah gave you another 100 years
In fact most of us do not know the basic principles in which the Sheikh has taught us and hence they become victims of the propaganda of Khawarij and Rawafiz.
“A scholar who abandons what has learnt from the Qur’an and the Sunnah and follows a ruler who does not rule in accordance with the teaching of Allah SWT and His Messenger r is an apostate and a disbeliever who deserves punishment in this world and in the hereafter ” Ibn Taymiyya
@@Egal_nichts the leader of Chechen openly told people to kill people on the Sunnah and called them wahhabi like meny other ignorant people do. Should they only realize that wahhabi is one of Allah's 99 names. And that ibn Abdul wahhab brought tawheed to Saudi.
"AAL E SAUD" Fix the major bid'ah and shirk that runs rampant in your country of Pakistan before you go around attacking the A-rabs you dislike so much, you racist.
@@hasinaakter2903 He's an unwitting agent of the Zionists, Shi'a, Kuffaar, and deviant sects because probably the only thing he does all day is attack the countries where Tawhid and the Sunnah is strongest. This is because he hates the Sunnah, this little agent of the Zionists and Rawafidh.
Yes you can Revolt against the ruler even if he is doing everything right if he is unworthy of the Khilafat according to Islam you should be replaced As Hazrat Hussain tried to do with yazid
The Present day Salafis blindy follows Saudi scholars, exactly following the footsteps of Jews and christians by taking their scholars and monks to the status of Almighty One God.
Thats fine and all if the ppl selected the ruler. But if the ppl didnt select the ruler and he still came through means of cheating then please. How are we supposed to take them as our rulers when we didnt ask for them or elect them.
@@TMNmedia theres no such thing as a simple democratic voting for a ruler. Also bait to the ruler is important. The decision makers or ahlul shura select the best and then the democratically, voting can be done. This example is for uthman RA. Or you can have ahl al-hall wa’l-‘aqd choose the ruler and if you agree you do bait.
@@somedude6334 Exactly Following blindly the footsteps of Yaoodh and Nasarah taking scholars to the status of Almight God as mentioned in chapter At tawbah of the Final Revelation.
@user-cg1pn8cn7c I got a book name Quran have you heard of it? Please read it how to give dawah when someone aprroach you, which is mentioned in surah kahf when nabi musa seeks knowledge from khidr alai salaam. By not saying i have more knowledge than you. The only answer you hear today from scholar of palaces are he is ignorant,hizbi,kharreji,takfeeri. Learn to distinguish between scholar of Islam and Scholars of palaces. Not to get deviated please follow the efforts of scholars who lived 100 years ago left their efforts in the form of bOoks. May allah subhantala once again send among us scholars like Shah waliullah, Shah ismail, Syed ahmed shaheed, Mian nazeer hussain, Siddique Hassan khan, sanaullah amritsari. These scholars knew islam and live islam never sold the deen of Allah for worldy gains and to please tyrant,opressors ,rulers. Hope you may know get up from the sleep of taqleed.
Cheykh 'Abderrahmân ibn Talâ' Al Mikhlif Ach-Chamrî dit sur Fawzan : Cet homme fait partie des savants du Tâghoût, qui le secourt et s'y allie. J'ai souvent répété aux frères que celui qui secourt le Tâghoût et se tien à ses cotés contre les monothéiste, c'est un apostat, car il n'a pas désavoué le Tâghoût. Soubhânallah, que leur est il arrivé ?! Ils se sont tenu du coté du Tâghoût et ont changé la religion d'Allah pour protéger les Tawâghît, et c'est ça le sommet de la foi au Tâghoût : ils mentent et diffament à l'encontre d'Allah, ils transforment les mots et changent la religion d'Allah pour protéger ces Tawâghît et pour que personne ne leur fasse de mal. Par contre, pour les monothéistes qui désavouent le Tâghoût et le jugent mécréant, ceux là ce sont des khawârij dont le sang et les biens sont licites et qu'il est obligatoire de combattre comme le furent 'Âd et Thâmoûd. Ils sont même les chiens de l'enfer selon leur idéologie, et ils le déclarent clairement.
@@younes2822 LOL, and him and his masters don't want to destroy islam from within? What is destroying Islam is secularism. What is destroying the ummah is nationalism. Fawzan is a scholar for whom? MBS? Isn't he replacing all Sharia with secular law? Isn't he loyal to Saudi Arabia, a nation?
@@hasinaakter2903If u can't have a states hold how u can implant Tawheed. and believing everyone of Muslims become right path is madness. wakeup to reality..
Man... Isnt it clear that scholar is advising us to be patience, and not taking any dzholim act towards whoever those in power by shredding their dignity to the ground?? We are the reflections of our leader anyway. Allah has decided that He is going to make a leader amongst your kind so why demand a great muslim leader when the people that demanding didn't even show what a great muslim would behave??
@@zebul5854 you explained people's hypocrisy pretty nicely. May Allah guide you. And here is a piece of knowledge that you can show the khawarij should get doubts through them. It is in Arabic tho: m.th-cam.com/video/gPHQW6Q5WWk/w-d-xo.html&pp=gAQBiAQB
Hajjaj was also a leader, and he was very evil. The people under him were the Salaf. That breaks your argument. Yazid was a leader, and was evil. The people under him were Sahabah. That also breaks your argument.
@@-------....___ tell me brother Are the shahaba & the salaf you mentioned didnt live amongst the fasiq & munafiq? Even if you are right, are we justify our dzolim act to the people of power just because we deem not worthy or simply don't like them? What are you on about?
@@zebul5854 The people of power are disbelievers because they removed and replaced Sharia. Kufr-bi-taghut. Go read about it. Read this, and then dont talk about 'dhulm' to those in power: Ali RA said it is the OBLIGATION on the ruler to implement the Sharia, ONLY THEN it becomes an obligation on the people to listen and to obey him. If you go to Nawawi or Ibn Taymiyya or Ibn Kathir, they said those who rule by other than Sharia are disbelievers. Even if fasiq and munafiq lived amongst them, it doesn't matter. There were still among them the Sahabah, the best people. According to you, this means that 100% of the people have to be good to get good leaders. And if Sahabah didn't have the best leaders because they had hypocrites among them, then we have no chance. Abu Bakr RA one of the greatest leaders, had to fight the hypocrites. There were fake prophets, hypocrites, apostates when Abu Bakr RA was ruling, so how was Abu Bakr RA a leader if the people were still bad? You have no idea what you are talking about. Or bring me classical scholarship, Nawawi, Ibn Taymiyya, Ibn Hazm, Qurtubi, Four Imams, Ibn Kathir, Tabari etc. Show me ANY of them saying that if the ruler removes Sharia he is still a believer and he should not be f0ught. Show me ANY of them saying that the leaders are from the people, and if the people are bad then they cant blame the leader. I have given you a hadith of the Prophet PBUH who clearly said a bigger fitnah is corrupt leaders leading the ummah astray.
@@-------....___ I used that as an argument???I literally used El hajjaj Ibn yusef as an example a couple of times so I don't get how it against me? And I don't get how that breaks my argument like El hajjaj was somewhat evil and the Sahabi Anas Ibn Malik told people to be patient with him and not revolt, and that's what I'm trying to get thrue to you people, so... the story of El hajjaj supports my point very very much
Do you really not know of what.. like tens of statements of the prophet ﷺ forbidding criticizing of Muslim rulers? Or statements of obliging obedience to the rulers even if he beats ones back and takes his money?
@@ozone2126 yes, I've read all the proofs from both sides. And if you look into the life of the sahaba+tabe'een, you will see that they did criticize the rulers and rebelled against kuffaar who don't implement shari'ah, even abu bakr radiAllahu anhu was ready to wage war for a tribe not willing to pay zakah this year.
@@InspoDesigno Just on what you said, I already know you DON’T know both of the sides and probably are allergic to books. Plz for your own sake listen to the works of shaykh Abdulaziz Al haqqan, shaykh Abdulrahman Hassan, and shaykh shamsi from the channel dus dawah. Listen to them particularly on this subject.
What do you give term about the action of Abdul aziz ibn saud and his scholars who rebelled against the ottomon khalifa who were custodian of Two Holy mosques for 500 years. And calling rulers from other country as Kafir (Saddam) and speaking ill of Muslim brotherhood. The only title saudi scholars deserves are Scholars of palaces not scholars of islam.
Please can someone clear it,the respected sheikh said we can’t take guns to fight against rulers,if yes,then what if they are bad people,sorry I am not getting it
The Prophet, ordered us to be patient with the oppressive ruler. Rebelling causes more harm than good. As we can see the case with Syria, Yemen and Egypt
@@adelbezdrob9417 Ordered us to be patient with rulers who are on haqq. Be patient with just rulers, just like be patient with your father when he becomes old of age. Stop lying.
@@-------....___ Rulers after me will come who do not follow my guidance and my Sunnah. Some of their men will have the hearts of devils in a human body. I said, “O Messenger of Allah, what should I do if I live to see that time?” The Prophet said: You should listen and obey them even if the ruler strikes your back and takes your wealth, even still listen and obey. Source: Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 1847, The Hadith clearly states a Ruler who isn’t following his Sunnah
@@-------....___ It his been narrated through a different chain of transmitters, on the authority of Hudhaifa b. al-Yaman who said: Messenger of Allah, no doubt, we had an evil time (i. e. the days of Jahiliyya or ignorance) and God brought us a good time (i. e. Islamic period) through which we are now living Will there be a bad time after this good time? He (the Holy Prophet) said: Yes. I said: Will there be a good time after this bad time? He said: Yes. I said: Will there be a bad time after good time? He said: Yes. I said: How? Whereupon he said: There will be leaders who will not be led by my guidance and who will not adopt my ways? There will be among them men who will have the hearts of devils in the bodies of human beings. I said: What should I do. Messenger of Allah, if I (happen) to live in that time? He replied: You will listen to the Amir and carry out his orders; even if your back is flogged and your wealth is snatched, you should listen and obey. - Sahih al-Bukhari 1847b
@@-------....___🤣 wayeyow you guys again. Yallah you said I am murji' right or not? Ok now bring me a piece of evidence...you can't because you smeren you ignorant thought everywhere you feel something goes against you're ahwa'
@@aminmez119 Which scholars? Palace scholars? Who work for the government? Because if you go to scholars like Nawawi, Ibn Taymiyyah, Ibn Hazm, Ibn Kathir, Tabari etc., then the 'rulers' of today are invalid because multiple rulers are not allowed, since nationalism is kufr then again all the rulers and their scholars and followers are disbelievers. When every classical scholar said Caliphate is an obligation upon every muslim. Ibn Taymiyyah went even further and said Caliphate is the pillar upon which all other pillars rest, and you cannot implement Islam without a Caliphate, then why do you ignore this? Show me these scholars, who preach obedience to taghut, calling for the unity and there return of the Caliphate
The problem we have today is that the not going against the ruler only applies if the ruler is operating under shariah. I challenge any of you to show me such a place. There is riba/interest in all of the land so please point out any ruler operating under true shariah. So this statement is a misleading one. None of the rulers operate under Islamic law anymore except maybe the Taliban and all these same scholars told us after 2001 they were bad yet in the 80s and 90s they mujahideen. So even this scholar has misguided most of you. Stop giving out the western approved version of Islam and give the real one
You say them mujahideen , you do grave worshipping which is a major shirk , countless newly invented matters for Worshipping which is bida'ah and The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) used to say, when beginning a khutbah (sermon): " The best of speech is the Book of Allah and the best of guidance is the guidance of Muhammad. The worst of things are those which are newly-invented, and every innovation is a going astray" (reported by Muslim, no. 867) . Yet there are some who leave this hadith and catch onto the weak and fabricated hadiths. If you know how shia was formed ( by a jew ) you can find out the how today's deen is divided and manipulated thinking the scholars of the sunnah from masjid-al-nabawi and masjid-al-haram are misguided, mujahideen etc , نَعُوْذُ بِاللهِ those are two of the most holiest places till The day of Judgement and if you think the scholars from there are misguided please make lot's of Dua ( without any partners , shirks ) . May Allah guide you.
@@rMeRUEM no thank you for the lecture, have you been to Afghanistan? Have you been to the two holy cities? Unless you have seen things first hand and not hearsay or TH-cam then you are just talking nonsense. The two holy cities are protected not the scholars who reside there and misguided Muslims, the problem with saying the Taliban are grave worshipers is you haven't been there and you haven't seen it first hand. Riba is one of the largest sins according to the Quran and Sunnah and the two holy cities practice it openly. Please don't lecture me without any knowledge or insights.
comment section literally filled with khawarij, no one realizes that their aqeedah is kufri and misguidance. Like guys at least for the sake of Allah just realize that they takfir you and your children, don't be ignorant to these kinds of things.
Yes, we tkfr anyone who says anyone who legislates in contradiction to Sharia, who makes halal what is haram, is a disbeliever. A person who drinks alcohol is a sinner, a ruler who legislates that alcohol can be drunk without being punished, is a disbeliever.
@@-------....___ True but these people will not understand until they are in Jahannam, because their hearts are blind and there is no point to talk nice to them
@@Herbert_Rudolf They seem to hate the Shia Rafidi the most, but they are the only sect that is most similar to them. Rafidi w0r.ship Imams, these people do the same with rulers and scholars. Always remember, if a murji'a/madkhali calls you khawarij, you know you are on the right path.
@md-xe8uf what truth do you see that other don't see what vision x pro has allah given you that others don't have but seriously tell me what makes you think he is ulama of dollar he is a respected scholar who spent his life serving Islam but some uneducated unqualified brothers like you who reads one article or watch one video starts going around and labeling people
@@-------....___ our properht saw commend us to to obey the ruler here is the proof Narrated by Abu Huraira: The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) said: "Whoever obeys me, obeys Allah, and whoever disobeys me, disobeys Allah. Whoever obeys the ruler, obeys me, and whoever disobeys the ruler, disobeys me." and there is no scholar alive today that focuses on tawheed as much as he does . so don't talk about stuff u don't know matter of I'm willing to challenge u to a debate if u r man enough to back up what u r saying
@@ibshelby3643 yes, Muslim ruler, Muslim Amir. Abu Bakr RA said there can only be one ruler of the ummah, not multiple. Nationalism is kufr yes? Secularism is kufr yes? Or do you follow Hadith (without understanding) and discard the Quran?
What this great scholar propagates is What Allah said, what the prophet ﷺ said, what the sahaba and righteous salaf said, if you have a problem with this you have a problem with what i listed.
@@kab1r We shouldn't trust blindly any scholar who is paid by these monarchies. Or show me fatwas from these scholars calling for unity of the muslims under a Caliphate. A Caliphate, as said by scholar Ibn Taymmiyah, is an OBLIGATION for every muslim. Where are their fatwas for the muslims to unite? When certain countries had issues with Qatar, these 'scholars' were quick to condemn Qatar.
@@-------....___ What Caliphate ? Are you mentally unstable ? Only the Quraysh can take on that position. We have leaders who rule by the Quran and Sunnah, and if they do wrong we should pray for their guidance. How should muslims unite except by tawheed. You people act like a caliphate would bring peace to the world which doesnt even makes sense. It says obey Allah and his messenger and those with authority, not Allah the messenger and the caliphs. Would you pls prove your statement that the scholars are getting paid to divide the people. Because that is what i understood from your comment. Who said that anyone is blindly following anyone ? He quotes the Quran and the Sunnah by the Manhaj of the Salaf. If you got a problem with that, you got a Aqeedah issue.
@@AlMulk21 typical madkhali words. Manhaj of the Salaf. Quran and Sunnah. Who said if leaders rule by other than Quran and Sunnah, you can only pray for their guidance LOL? Is that what the Sahabah did? My point was clear. A caliphate can be ruled by a caliph, Amir, or imam. Even a king. Muslims should unite under a single ruler, call him whatever you want. This is in line with Quran. Do not divide, stick with the main body. There are many Hadiths and Quran verses about ummah being United. Many old scholars said caliphate is an obligation. Many old scholars said there can only be one ruler of the muslims, and it is forbidden to have two rulers (Abu Bakr RA). Many old scholars said Muslim land cannot be segregated, it is forbidden. So, where are the scholars forcing this? Instead the scholars only force ‘obey the ruler’ especially when those Hadith are meant for a caliph, Amir, or imam of the muslims. Talking to you madkhalis gives me a headache honestly. Honestly stop with the ‘aqeedah’ and ‘manhaj of the Salaf’. These words are nice but the madkhali are far away from it. Madkhali meaning the bootlickers like you. If Sahabah were alive today, you would be the first people they would go after. Hypocrites acting like gatekeepers of Islam.
Because it is a simple answer to the 3ammah, if you want evidence nobody forbade you from looking into his books and other scholars books or even heading to the search bar.
@@NotUrDJ alright bring the evidence 🧾, I don't need evidence to say I'm bootliking the government rather the one accusing me of it should bring it forth.
@@aminmez119so is he lying? Did the Arabs not revolt against the last Caliphate? You know what the disbelievers said was their biggest goal that they achieved? The state of Israel between the Muslims, and Arab nationalism to destroy the caliphate and make the ummah weak. I wonder what they meant.
Do you hate Arabs? The people from whom the prophet Mohammed was send? The people of Mekka and Madina? The people of tawheed? You Know that the ottomans were sufis right? There are meany sufi sects that do graveworshipping, one of their sects believe Allah is everywhere another thinks all they see is Allah, these are all sufis, where do you see this belief in Saudia?d@@-------....___
So in your eyes Turks and Serbs are good and Arabs are bad? Cuz you don't say Saudi people you flat out say Arabs like the kuffars like to say it. The Arabs are the grand children of Sahaba and are the people from whom the prophet mohammed got send. People of mekkah and medinah.
May Allah bless this noble scholar.
Ameen
You cannot go Against ruler?😂😂if your ruler rape your mother,then can you give statement Against your ruler?😂😂😂
Ameen
Aameen
May Allah punish him and those like him.
The question was perfectly accurate … spoke the truth
May Allah forgive and accept us ameen.May Allah guide us ameen.
الدكتور شيخ العلامه المهمه بقيت السلف صالح الفوزان الفوزان حفظه الله
How many ulema have been locked up by the government. Thats the question... Arw they all khawaarij. Or the best of mujaahideen who speak a word of truth against an oppressive ruler
What about muawiya (r)
@@hafismuhammed2712 Muawiya rebelled (did khurooj) on two Rightly Guided Caliphs of his time, Ali(r) and Hasan(r), no Muslim should have love for praise for such an evil man.
@@أفلاكالأفكارAuuthibillah. May Allah Subhana Wa Tala guide you or break your back. Ameen.
You've lied against the great sahabi who spread this Deen far for the sake of Allah Subhana Wa Tala.
Please learn the history, and fear Allah for everything you say will be used against you. You have 2 angels writing down everything you say, and type.
@@أفلاكالأفكارhis a sahabi, don’t speak of him like that, respect him
@@7asan_r I don't respect people who waged civil wars against Two Rightly Guided Caliphs, especially when Ali(RA) made dua against Mu'awiya in Musannaf ibn Abi Shaybah:
حدثنا هشيم، قال: أخبرنا حصين، قال: حدثنا عبد الرحمن بن مغفل [كذا، والصحيح: معقل] ، قال: صليت مع عليٍّ صلاة الغداة، قال: فقنت فقال في قنوته: اللهم عليك بمعاوية وأشياعه، وعمرو بن العاص وأشياعه، وأبي الأعور السلمي وأشياعه، وعبد الله بن قيس وأشياعه.
Mu'awiya made war against Ali(RA), who is the Mawla of the Mu'mineen according to the mutawatir hadith
and made war against Hasan(RA), who is one of the Sayyids of the youth of paradise according to the hadith in Bukhari
and you expect me to respect him?
Ali(RA) made dua against Mu'awiya, so I have no problem following my master Ali(RA), the spiritual brother of our Prophet(pbuh)
Scholars should be as far away as possible from governments
Why ... thrs a saying in india.....
Scholars turning away from rulers gave us rulers like Akbar, turning to them gave us rulers like Aurangzeb
Because they are then at the behest of their governments, which means there may be conflicts of interest
You got it backwards, scholars were the rulers during Rashidun Caliphate. The sahaba who ruled like Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman, and Ali RA were pretty much hafiz in Quran with the best understanding and knew probably all of the Sunnah at its peak. They were literally peak in terms of knowledge, I am pretty sure if scholars were appointed as rulers instead of people within family, we wouldn’t be having this issue
@@mhersi2dude - in an ideal world, yes. But in contemporary times, it's a whole different story
@@EconomicsDomain Are you muslim?
May Allah preserve the health of Sheikh Fawzan.
Ameen
Aameen
Ameen
May Allah (SWT) guide Fawzan, he is very negative person, something is wrong with his thinking. May Allah guide him, as he doesn't act like a respectful person.
@@Hedya-c9q why do every troll hide its name.
Hadith
"حَدَّثَنَا رَاشِدُ بْنُ سَعِيدٍ الرَّمْلِيُّ، حَدَّثَنَا الْوَلِيدُ بْنُ مُسْلِمٍ، حَدَّثَنَا حَمَّادُ بْنُ سَلَمَةَ، عَنْ أَبِي غَالِبٍ، عَنْ أَبِي أُمَامَةَ، قَالَ عَرَضَ لِرَسُولِ اللَّهِ ـ صلى الله عليه وسلم ـ رَجُلٌ عِنْدَ الْجَمْرَةِ الأُولَى فَقَالَ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ أَىُّ الْجِهَادِ أَفْضَلُ فَسَكَتَ عَنْهُ فَلَمَّا رَأَى الْجَمْرَةَ الثَّانِيَةَ سَأَلَهُ فَسَكَتَ عَنْهُ فَلَمَّا رَمَى جَمْرَةَ الْعَقَبَةِ وَضَعَ رِجْلَهُ فِي الْغَرْزِ لِيَرْكَبَ قَالَ " أَيْنَ السَّائِلُ " . قَالَ أَنَا يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ قَالَ " كَلِمَةُ حَقٍّ عِنْدَ ذِي سُلْطَانٍ جَائِرٍ " ."
It was narrated that Abu Umamah said:
“A man came to the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) at the first pillar and said: ‘O Messenger of Allah, which Jihad is best?’ but he kept quiet. When he saw the second Pillar, he asked again, and he kept quiet. When he stoned ‘Aqabah Pillar, he placed his foot in the stirrup, to ride, and said: ‘Where is the one who was asking?’ (The man) said: ‘Here I am, O Messenger of Allah.’ He said: *‘A word of truth spoken to an unjust ruler.’”*
( حضرت ابوامامہ رضی اللہ عنہ سے روایت ہے کہ ایک آدمی پہلے جمرے کے قریب رسول اللہ ﷺ کے سامنے آیا اور کہا : اللہ کے رسول ! کون سا جہاد افضل ہے ؟ آپ خاموش رہے ۔ جب آپ دوسرے جمرے پر پہنچے تو اس نے ( پھر ) سوال کیا ۔ آپ خاموش رہے ۔ پھر جب آپ نے جمرۂ عقبہ ( بڑے جمرے ) پر کنکریاں ماریں اور سوار ہونے کے لیے رکاب میں پاؤں رکھا تو فرمایا :’’ سوال کرنے والا کہاں ہے ؟‘‘ اس نے کہا : اللہ کے رسول ! میں ہوں ۔ آپ نے فرمایا :*’’ ظالم سلطان کے سامنے کلمۂ حق کہنا ( افضل جہاد ہے* ۔‘‘ )
Sunan Ibn e Majah#4012
فتنوں سے متعلق احکام و مسائل
Status: صحیح)
Sunan Ibn Majah, 4012
In-Book Reference: Book 36, Hadith 87
English Reference: Vol. 5, Book 36, Hadith 4012
Get Hadith Collection (All in one) App gtaf.org/apps/hadith
#GreentechApps #Hadith
Allah knows the difference between the righteous scholars and the scholars for dollars. If their advice is supported by Qur'an and Sunnah, Alhamdulillah but if it's not , we must ignore it.
I saw one scholar say that saudi is killing the Yemeni in self defense and they are collateral damage Astagfirullah and another saying that the boycott of companies or countries that are killing our Palestinian Brothers and Sisters is Haram Astagfirullah. Insha'Allah they will need to answer to Allah, as will all of us.
Criticizing the Muslim rulers is forbidden according to the sunnah and salaf. You say you take Quran and sunnah right? Then read early athari Creed books which usually reference this.
@@ozone2126only applies to muslim rulers
@@warmongerfenrir8524 your right, I thought the context would clear that up but I’ll edit my comment
@@ozone2126But why did Salman Al Farisi (RA) blatantly asked Umar (RA) about his dress in public and Umar answered his question he said now we will obey and listen to you
No, if scholars become lapdogs of government, they will lose their status, their independence and will not criticize their govts. Like what is happening in Saudi, Iran Turkey. Why our imams like Shafi, Malik, Hanifa refused to serve government. The statement by the Molvi, is nothing but fascist thinking.
Hadith
أَخْبَرَنَا هَارُونُ بْنُ إِسْحَاقَ، قَالَ حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدٌ، - يَعْنِي ابْنَ عَبْدِ الْوَهَّابِ - قَالَ حَدَّثَنَا مِسْعَرٌ، عَنْ أَبِي حَصِينٍ، عَنِ الشَّعْبِيِّ، عَنْ عَاصِمٍ الْعَدَوِيِّ، عَنْ كَعْبِ بْنِ عُجْرَةَ، قَالَ خَرَجَ إِلَيْنَا رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم وَنَحْنُ تِسْعَةٌ خَمْسَةٌ وَأَرْبَعَةٌ أَحَدُ الْعَدَدَيْنِ مِنَ الْعَرَبِ وَالآخَرُ مِنَ الْعَجَمِ فَقَالَ " اسْمَعُوا هَلْ سَمِعْتُمْ أَنَّهُ سَتَكُونُ بَعْدِي أُمَرَاءُ مَنْ دَخَلَ عَلَيْهِمْ فَصَدَّقَهُمْ بِكَذِبِهِمْ وَأَعَانَهُمْ عَلَى ظُلْمِهِمْ فَلَيْسَ مِنِّي وَلَسْتُ مِنْهُ وَلَيْسَ يَرِدُ عَلَىَّ الْحَوْضَ وَمَنْ لَمْ يَدْخُلْ عَلَيْهِمْ وَلَمْ يُصَدِّقْهُمْ بِكَذِبِهِمْ وَلَمْ يُعِنْهُمْ عَلَى ظُلْمِهِمْ فَهُوَ مِنِّي وَأَنَا مِنْهُ وَسَيَرِدُ عَلَىَّ الْحَوْضَ " .
It was narrated that Kab bin Ujrah said:
"The Messenger of Allah came out to us and we were nine, fie and four, some 'Arabs and some non- 'Arabs. He said: 'Listen. Have you heard that after me *there will be rulers, whoever enters upon them and believes their lies and help them in their wrongdoing is not of me, and I am not of him,* and he will not come to me at the Cistern? Whoever does not enter upon them or belive their lies or help them in their wrongdoing is of me and I am of him, and he will come to me at the Cistern."'
Sahih (Darussalam)
(حضرت کعب بن عجرہ رضی اللہ عنہ بیان کرتے ہیں کہ رسول اللہ ﷺ ہمارے پاس تشریف لائے ۔ ہم نو آدمی تھے ۔ پانچ عربی ، چار عجمی یا چار عربی اور پانچ عجمی ۔ آپ نے فرمایا :*’’ سنو ! کیا تم سن رہے ہو ؟ یقیناً میرے ( فوت ہونے کے ) بعد کچھ ایسے امیر ہوں گے کہ جو شخص ان کے پاس جائے گا ، پھر ان کے جھوٹ میں ان کی تصدیق کرے گا ، اور ان کے ظلم میں ان کا ساتھ دے گا ، نہ اس کا مجھ سے تعلق ہے اور نہ میرا اس سے ۔ اور وہ میرے پاس حوض کوثر پر نہیں آ سکے گا ۔* اور جو شخص ان کے پاس نہ گیا ( یا گیا لیکن ) ان کے جھوٹ کی تصدیق نہ کی اور ظلم میں ان کا ساتھ نہ دیا ، وہ میرا ہے ۔ میں اس کا ہوں اور وہ ضرور میرے پاس حوض کوثر پر حاضری کی سعادت حاصل کرے گا ۔‘‘ )
Sunan Nasai#4213
کتاب: بیعت سے متعلق احکام و مسائل
Sunan an-Nasa'i, 4208
In-Book Reference: Book 39, Hadith 60
English Reference: Vol. 5, Book 39, Hadith 4213
Get Hadith Collection (All in one) App gtaf.org/apps/hadith
#GreentechApps #Hadith
Now, how does this apply to the scholars of Saudi Arabia? Which scholar is helping the ruler in things which are impermissible?
@@thesalafislav Isn't your G0D MBS making halal what is haram, and the scholars are still supporting him?
@@-------....___ Where did MBS declare that something haram is halal? I'm waiting for an answer. And MBS isn't my god. Watch your filthy kharijite mouth.
that is what the media's trying to tell you, visit saudi first, or get educated before talking @@-------....___
@@vsmlik yeah okay. So there are no c0ncerts? No bik1ni beaches? No riba banks?
لا اله إلا الله
Hadith
"حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ بَشَّارٍ، حَدَّثَنَا غُنْدَرٌ، حَدَّثَنَا شُعْبَةُ، عَنْ زُبَيْدٍ، عَنْ سَعْدِ بْنِ عُبَيْدَةَ، عَنْ أَبِي عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ، عَنْ عَلِيٍّ ـ رضى الله عنه ـ أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ صلى الله عليه وسلم بَعَثَ جَيْشًا وَأَمَّرَ عَلَيْهِمْ رَجُلاً، فَأَوْقَدَ نَارًا وَقَالَ ادْخُلُوهَا. فَأَرَادُوا أَنْ يَدْخُلُوهَا، وَقَالَ آخَرُونَ إِنَّمَا فَرَرْنَا مِنْهَا، فَذَكَرُوا لِلنَّبِيِّ صلى الله عليه وسلم فَقَالَ لِلَّذِينَ أَرَادُوا أَنْ يَدْخُلُوهَا " لَوْ دَخَلُوهَا لَمْ يَزَالُوا فِيهَا إِلَى يَوْمِ الْقِيَامَةِ ". وَقَالَ لِلآخَرِينَ " لاَ طَاعَةَ فِي مَعْصِيَةٍ، إِنَّمَا الطَّاعَةُ فِي الْمَعْرُوفِ "."
Narrated `Ali:
The Prophet (ﷺ) , sent an army and appointed some man their commander The man made a fire and then said (to the soldiers), "Enter it." Some of them intended to enter it while some others said, 'We have run away from it (i.e., embraced Islam to save ourselves from the 'fire')." They mentioned that to the Prophet, and he said about people who had intended to enter the fire. *''If they had entered it, they would have remained In it till the Day of Resurrection.'' Then he said to others, "No obedience for evil deeds, obedience is required only in what is good ."*
( نبی کریم ﷺ نے ایک لشکر بھیجا اور اس کا امیر ایک صاحب عبداللہ بن حذافہ سہمی کو بنایا ، پھر ( اس نے کیا کیا کہ ) آگ جلوائی اور ( لشکریوں سے ) کہا کہ اس میں داخل ہو جاؤ ۔ جس پر بعض لوگوں نے داخل ہونا چاہا لیکن کچھ لوگوں نے کہا کہ ہم آگ ہی سے بھاگ کر آئے ہیں ۔ پھر اس کا ذکر آنحضرت ﷺ سے کیا تو آپ نے ان سے فرمایا ، جنہوں نے آگ میں داخل ہونے کا ارادہ کیا تھا کہ *اگر تم اس میں داخل ہو جاتے تو اس میں قیامت تک رہتے ۔ اور دوسرے لوگوں سے کہا کہ اللہ تعالیٰ کی نافرمانی میں کسی کی اطاعت حلال نہیں ہے اطاعت صرف نیک کاموں میں ہے ۔)*
Sahih al-Bukhari, 7257
In-Book Reference: Book 95, Hadith 12
USC-MSA web (English) reference: Vol. 9, Book 91, Hadith 363 (deprecated numbering scheme)
Get Hadith Collection (All in one) App gtaf.org/apps/hadith
#GreentechApps #Hadith
May Allah bless the Shaykh.
The false propaganda against the righteous scholars is done to take people away from their guidance and advice.
Moreover they can’t even prove it if asked to. This allegation is only based on the whims and desires.
Brainwashed somewhat 👊😂
you are a bot
Free Palestine
watering down the deen, may allah curse the taghut
* ALLAH SWT
May Allah guide the khawarij that are still alive
@@AnaAthari Yes, let them be guided. And the taghut, and their scholars, and their followers, what will guide them? They worship taghut
@@-------....___ you are probably one of the guys that praise the extremist khariji misguided usama ben laden
@@AnaAtharidon't get too much in a debate with him I've made that mistake and ended up getting about 30 comment from the dude and he also won't stop accusing us of grave worshipping idk where he got that from.
I'm dressing as a madkhalee for haloweeen
I will dress up as MBS for halloween.
(slaps forehead)
@@aminmez119 mbs is kafir and most muslim rulers in the gulf
Now go cry
@@TherealStevenSeagalyou are ignorant or evil. Or both idk.
Shush, khariji@@TherealStevenSeagal
Sheikh Salih Al Fawzan is right حفظه الله, we all make mistakes and are imperfect so are our leaders, we pray for their guidance and ours. And according to Ibn Abbas رَضِيَ ٱللَّٰهُ عَنْهُ this time of kufr doesn’t take u out of deen
You are wrong. Legislating on muslim land, making permissible what Allah SWT has made impermissible is not kufr duna kufr. It is kufr. You seem like a Saudi paid bot. Otherwise you wouldn't say things like this.
Wrong
@@Herbert_Rudolf you’re wrong
@@Ahmad0609 replacing sharia is not a mistake ya madkhali murji'a. What was the context when Ibn Abbas said that. Was it when the people used that ayah to make takfir of sinners, or did they use that ayah to make takfir of taghut?
@@-------....___ they’re two types of situations here as Ahmad Ibn hanbal رَحِمَهُ ٱللَّٰهُ said and Ibn Taymiyyah mentioned in Majmu Al Fatwa, one who commits the haram but he knows it’s haram and the one who commits the haram and says it’s halal, one is Kufr Akbar (the latter) and the other is Kufr but it doesn’t take u out of Islam
The scholars are ”agents” of Allah azzawajal! Allahu akbar
May Allah bless and protect the Schaykh
Scholars had done the best ever possible. If it's true by criticizing the rulers and they find it is in accordance to the teaching of the prophet, then they would issue the fatawa for doing so.
This Court Scholar for Dollar avoided the Question about working for and obeying MBS and his Western practices
Lol thought i'm the only who saw that
He was the first sheikh to speak about riyadh season and muscial concerts though so stop lying on his name
He says what they are doing buying players for these huge sums is haram so again is he an agent if mbs . Please dont talk without knowledge
@@Majed2000AFR👍
@@aminmez119are you madkhali. Do you worship Fawzan?
@@Majed2000AFRwhere did he say these things? Because others that said it got locked up. Why is he still free
This is interesting in another recording this scholar clarifies that a ruler rhsf doesn’t judge by the rule of Allah has committed kuffar I just think they don’t want to get locked up
their deen changes with who the ruler is
Frankly, I'm trying to make sense of this. He tried to completely dodge the question. And he didn't deny it.
People who accuse the respected scholars of such things aren't worthy of attention. These people are all people of desires.
He basically said have trust in the scholars. For indeed they are the inheritors of the prophets as per hadith.
@@OfficialBruceLee Look how quick you hypocrites are to slander the scholars
@@OfficialBruceLee slander scholars and you lose your akhirah
@@OfficialBruceLee doesn't matter. Only people of knowledge recognise each other.
I think he was personally offended by the question
These ignoramuses in the comment section who base their opinions and criteria rooted in alien, non Islamic methodologies really is like a knife to the eyes. May Allâh give us ḥidāyah
Ameen
Ameen. Taghoot is Taghoot however.
@@RobertOfStAlbans_what do you mean...
@@aminmez119it is clear what he means. Only a taghut worshipper wouldn’t understand
@@-------....___ it is the other way around mate
Surah al ahzab ayah 66 to 68 speaks about the shuyook of the rulers and those who follow them and there disobedience and misguidance
The Day their faces will be turned about in the Fire, they will say, "How we wish we had obeyed Allāh and obeyed the Messenger."
And they will say, "Our Lord, indeed we obeyed our masters and our dignitaries,[1] and they led us astray from the [right] way.
Our Lord, give them double the punishment and curse them with a great curse."
Wow a scholar and he’s only answer to the topic is accusing everyone that has doubt in todays scholars and institutes as Khawarij, doesn’t make that him even a way bigger Khawarij 😂😂 may Allah gave you another 100 years
May Allah guide you
@@aminmez119 May Allah SWT put you in the same place he will put these taghut and their 'scholars'.
@@aminmez119 ok .b.0.t. of madkhali
In fact most of us do not know the basic principles in which the Sheikh has taught us and hence they become victims of the propaganda of Khawarij and Rawafiz.
جزاك الله خيرا
madkhali murji'a
@@-------....___ you missed twice in one comment, maybe a new record.
@@aminmez119 listen, answer this. Which one of your G0ds is biggest? MBS, Fawzan or Uthaymeen?
@@-------....___ show me how fawzan and Uthaymeen we're wrong on the topic then let's talk. And you accused me again.
The Mufti of the Taghut is also a Taghut.
Are you a supporter of ISIS?
indeed haqq ya Akhi
“A scholar who abandons what has learnt from the Qur’an and the Sunnah and follows a ruler who does not rule in accordance with the teaching of Allah SWT and His Messenger r is an apostate and a disbeliever who deserves punishment in this world and in the hereafter ” Ibn Taymiyya
@@-------....___ yet you can't bring forth evidence sheikh rabee is like that. Thanks for the info.
@@Egal_nichts the leader of Chechen openly told people to kill people on the Sunnah and called them wahhabi like meny other ignorant people do. Should they only realize that wahhabi is one of Allah's 99 names. And that ibn Abdul wahhab brought tawheed to Saudi.
Agents of AAL E SAUD.
Whose agent u are?
"AAL E SAUD"
Fix the major bid'ah and shirk that runs rampant in your country of Pakistan before you go around attacking the A-rabs you dislike so much, you racist.
@@hasinaakter2903 He's an unwitting agent of the Zionists, Shi'a, Kuffaar, and deviant sects because probably the only thing he does all day is attack the countries where Tawhid and the Sunnah is strongest. This is because he hates the Sunnah, this little agent of the Zionists and Rawafidh.
@@hasinaakter2903 Allah SWT. We reject taghut, and worship Allah SWT
Yes you can Revolt against the ruler even if he is doing everything right if he is unworthy of the Khilafat according to Islam you should be replaced As Hazrat Hussain tried to do with yazid
If rebelling against a government makes you Khuwarij than Muawiya was the biggest of khuwarij because he rebelled against rashidun Caliphate
Same goes to every Muslim Dynasty and Empires Sulthanate and even some of caliphate to..
Including you ya fawzan
The Present day Salafis blindy follows Saudi scholars, exactly following the footsteps of Jews and christians by taking their scholars and monks to the status of Almighty One God.
True May Allah curse them for eternity
Not when the scholars bring forth evidence from the Kitab was El sunnah:
m.th-cam.com/video/gPHQW6Q5WWk/w-d-xo.html&pp=gAQBiAQB
@@aminmez119 Is your whole religion based on what Uthaymeen said?
@@aminmez119 If MBS took you for Quwm-Lut activities, will you say no? Or will you 'hear and obey oh l0rd'?
@@-------....___ same cassette tape rewinded
Thats fine and all if the ppl selected the ruler. But if the ppl didnt select the ruler and he still came through means of cheating then please. How are we supposed to take them as our rulers when we didnt ask for them or elect them.
Since when the "people" selected the ruler in Islam?
@@TMNmedia since the time the concept of bait was established
@@deathshadow5316 did u mean bayah? Bayah is not democratic voting from the people to elect a caliph 😒
@@TMNmedia theres no such thing as a simple democratic voting for a ruler. Also bait to the ruler is important. The decision makers or ahlul shura select the best and then the democratically, voting can be done. This example is for uthman RA. Or you can have ahl al-hall wa’l-‘aqd choose the ruler and if you agree you do bait.
Scholars of Firauun Bin Salman
Khariji follower of Ibn Saba detected!
@@somedude6334 Exactly Following blindly the footsteps of Yaoodh and Nasarah taking scholars to the status of Almight God as mentioned in chapter At tawbah of the Final Revelation.
They worship the king and they don't even realize that 😢
@@kingkhalid10000 Are you making takfir upon me you Khariji simpleton?
@user-cg1pn8cn7c I got a book name Quran have you heard of it? Please read it how to give dawah when someone aprroach you, which is mentioned in surah kahf when nabi musa seeks knowledge from khidr alai salaam. By not saying i have more knowledge than you. The only answer you hear today from scholar of palaces are he is ignorant,hizbi,kharreji,takfeeri. Learn to distinguish between scholar of Islam and Scholars of palaces. Not to get deviated please follow the efforts of scholars who lived 100 years ago left their efforts in the form of bOoks. May allah subhantala once again send among us scholars like Shah waliullah, Shah ismail, Syed ahmed shaheed, Mian nazeer hussain, Siddique Hassan khan, sanaullah amritsari. These scholars knew islam and live islam never sold the deen of Allah for worldy gains and to please tyrant,opressors ,rulers. Hope you may know get up from the sleep of taqleed.
Cheykh 'Abderrahmân ibn Talâ' Al Mikhlif
Ach-Chamrî dit sur Fawzan : Cet homme fait partie des savants du Tâghoût, qui le secourt et s'y allie. J'ai souvent répété aux frères que celui qui secourt le Tâghoût et se tien à ses cotés contre les monothéiste, c'est un apostat, car il n'a pas désavoué le Tâghoût.
Soubhânallah, que leur est il arrivé ?! Ils se sont tenu du coté du Tâghoût et ont changé la
religion d'Allah pour protéger les Tawâghît, et c'est ça le sommet de la foi au Tâghoût : ils
mentent et diffament à l'encontre d'Allah, ils transforment les mots et changent la religion
d'Allah pour protéger ces Tawâghît et pour que personne ne leur fasse de mal.
Par contre, pour les monothéistes qui désavouent le Tâghoût et le jugent mécréant, ceux là
ce sont des khawârij dont le sang et les biens sont licites et qu'il est obligatoire de
combattre comme le furent 'Âd et Thâmoûd. Ils sont même les chiens de l'enfer selon leur
idéologie, et ils le déclarent clairement.
100%
Khawarij de france et/and khawarij of england
The "scholar" is not answering the question LOL
@@younes2822 LOL, and him and his masters don't want to destroy islam from within? What is destroying Islam is secularism. What is destroying the ummah is nationalism. Fawzan is a scholar for whom? MBS? Isn't he replacing all Sharia with secular law? Isn't he loyal to Saudi Arabia, a nation?
Answer seems diplomatic
You seem to have something to say... Spit it out
@@aminmez119 Its obvious.
Where is the Khilafat of Allah if scholars are not being Agents?
Don't worry for khilada. Concentrate on tawheed first
Khilafa
@@hasinaakter2903concentrate on everything not just one thing
@@hasinaakter2903If u can't have a states hold how u can implant Tawheed. and believing everyone of Muslims become right path is madness. wakeup to reality..
He didn't answer the question directly
This Ulama suu talking about muslims
Why is he an "ulama al suu"?
I'm a revert and I don't get it
@@BrightStar-bz5oj You are a revert, and you see through these tricks.
These people study all their lives, and cant stop their obedience to taghut
These modern Kharajites expose themselves. All they offer is insults and cherry picked anecdotes.
NEVER will they learn their deen.
Our deen is to obey Allah SWT and w0r.ship him.
Your deen is to w0r.ship rulers and scholars
TBF though some are 🥾👅 to the rulers, it seems.🤷
Fear Allah
@@ozone2126 I wish they would rather than the ruler.🤷🏿♂️
@@ozone2126get merked
@@younes2822 And one basic is calling out rulers for being Taaghoot or do you seriously consider MBS as Ameer-ul-Mohmineen.🤷🏿♂️
@@ozone2126 You are worshipping saudi why dont you start fearing Allah?
Man...
Isnt it clear that scholar is advising us to be patience, and not taking any dzholim act towards whoever those in power by shredding their dignity to the ground??
We are the reflections of our leader anyway. Allah has decided that He is going to make a leader amongst your kind
so why demand a great muslim leader when the people that demanding didn't even show what a great muslim would behave??
@@zebul5854 you explained people's hypocrisy pretty nicely.
May Allah guide you. And here is a piece of knowledge that you can show the khawarij should get doubts through them.
It is in Arabic tho:
m.th-cam.com/video/gPHQW6Q5WWk/w-d-xo.html&pp=gAQBiAQB
Hajjaj was also a leader, and he was very evil.
The people under him were the Salaf.
That breaks your argument.
Yazid was a leader, and was evil.
The people under him were Sahabah.
That also breaks your argument.
@@-------....___ tell me brother
Are the shahaba & the salaf you mentioned didnt live amongst the fasiq & munafiq?
Even if you are right, are we justify our dzolim act to the people of power just because we deem not worthy or simply don't like them?
What are you on about?
@@zebul5854 The people of power are disbelievers because they removed and replaced Sharia. Kufr-bi-taghut. Go read about it.
Read this, and then dont talk about 'dhulm' to those in power:
Ali RA said it is the OBLIGATION on the ruler to implement the Sharia, ONLY THEN it becomes an obligation on the people to listen and to obey him.
If you go to Nawawi or Ibn Taymiyya or Ibn Kathir, they said those who rule by other than Sharia are disbelievers.
Even if fasiq and munafiq lived amongst them, it doesn't matter. There were still among them the Sahabah, the best people.
According to you, this means that 100% of the people have to be good to get good leaders. And if Sahabah didn't have the best leaders because they had hypocrites among them, then we have no chance.
Abu Bakr RA one of the greatest leaders, had to fight the hypocrites. There were fake prophets, hypocrites, apostates when Abu Bakr RA was ruling, so how was Abu Bakr RA a leader if the people were still bad?
You have no idea what you are talking about.
Or bring me classical scholarship, Nawawi, Ibn Taymiyya, Ibn Hazm, Qurtubi, Four Imams, Ibn Kathir, Tabari etc.
Show me ANY of them saying that if the ruler removes Sharia he is still a believer and he should not be f0ught.
Show me ANY of them saying that the leaders are from the people, and if the people are bad then they cant blame the leader.
I have given you a hadith of the Prophet PBUH who clearly said a bigger fitnah is corrupt leaders leading the ummah astray.
@@-------....___ I used that as an argument???I literally used El hajjaj Ibn yusef as an example a couple of times so I don't get how it against me?
And I don't get how that breaks my argument like El hajjaj was somewhat evil and the Sahabi Anas Ibn Malik told people to be patient with him and not revolt, and that's what I'm trying to get thrue to you people, so... the story of El hajjaj supports my point very very much
everybody is khariji, unless he kisses feet of the ruler and lets him touch his wife, right?
go repent to allah and delete this comment
Do you really not know of what.. like tens of statements of the prophet ﷺ forbidding criticizing of Muslim rulers? Or statements of obliging obedience to the rulers even if he beats ones back and takes his money?
@@ozone2126 yes, I've read all the proofs from both sides. And if you look into the life of the sahaba+tabe'een, you will see that they did criticize the rulers and rebelled against kuffaar who don't implement shari'ah, even abu bakr radiAllahu anhu was ready to wage war for a tribe not willing to pay zakah this year.
@@InspoDesigno Just on what you said, I already know you DON’T know both of the sides and probably are allergic to books. Plz for your own sake listen to the works of shaykh Abdulaziz Al haqqan, shaykh Abdulrahman Hassan, and shaykh shamsi from the channel dus dawah. Listen to them particularly on this subject.
@@ozone2126 shamsi is a fool who gave bay'ah to tabboune. You are ignorant. Learn or burn.
What do you give term about the action of Abdul aziz ibn saud and his scholars who rebelled against the ottomon khalifa who were custodian of Two Holy mosques for 500 years. And calling rulers from other country as Kafir (Saddam) and speaking ill of Muslim brotherhood. The only title saudi scholars deserves are Scholars of palaces not scholars of islam.
Please can someone clear it,the respected sheikh said we can’t take guns to fight against rulers,if yes,then what if they are bad people,sorry I am not getting it
The Prophet, ordered us to be patient with the oppressive ruler. Rebelling causes more harm than good. As we can see the case with Syria, Yemen and Egypt
@@adelbezdrob9417 jazak Allah
@@adelbezdrob9417 Ordered us to be patient with rulers who are on haqq. Be patient with just rulers, just like be patient with your father when he becomes old of age.
Stop lying.
@@-------....___ Rulers after me will come who do not follow my guidance and my Sunnah. Some of their men will have the hearts of devils in a human body.
I said, “O Messenger of Allah, what should I do if I live to see that time?” The Prophet said:
You should listen and obey them even if the ruler strikes your back and takes your wealth, even still listen and obey.
Source: Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 1847,
The Hadith clearly states a Ruler who isn’t following his Sunnah
@@-------....___ It his been narrated through a different chain of transmitters, on the authority of Hudhaifa b. al-Yaman who said:
Messenger of Allah, no doubt, we had an evil time (i. e. the days of Jahiliyya or ignorance) and God brought us a good time (i. e. Islamic period) through which we are now living Will there be a bad time after this good time? He (the Holy Prophet) said: Yes. I said: Will there be a good time after this bad time? He said: Yes. I said: Will there be a bad time after good time? He said: Yes. I said: How? Whereupon he said: There will be leaders who will not be led by my guidance and who will not adopt my ways? There will be among them men who will have the hearts of devils in the bodies of human beings. I said: What should I do. Messenger of Allah, if I (happen) to live in that time? He replied: You will listen to the Amir and carry out his orders; even if your back is flogged and your wealth is snatched, you should listen and obey.
- Sahih al-Bukhari 1847b
Man some of the comments of this video are really confusing ngl
Welp...
What's confusing. Man came here to help wassup where's the problem?🤔
Don't listen to this guy. He is murji'a worshipper of scholars and rulers.
@@-------....___🤣 wayeyow you guys again. Yallah you said I am murji' right or not? Ok now bring me a piece of evidence...you can't because you smeren you ignorant thought everywhere you feel something goes against you're ahwa'
@@-------....___ Go read and listen to scholars explanations about the Hadith and the qur an. Did I say something wrong here?
@@aminmez119 Which scholars? Palace scholars? Who work for the government? Because if you go to scholars like Nawawi, Ibn Taymiyyah, Ibn Hazm, Ibn Kathir, Tabari etc., then the 'rulers' of today are invalid because multiple rulers are not allowed, since nationalism is kufr then again all the rulers and their scholars and followers are disbelievers.
When every classical scholar said Caliphate is an obligation upon every muslim. Ibn Taymiyyah went even further and said Caliphate is the pillar upon which all other pillars rest, and you cannot implement Islam without a Caliphate, then why do you ignore this?
Show me these scholars, who preach obedience to taghut, calling for the unity and there return of the Caliphate
The problem we have today is that the not going against the ruler only applies if the ruler is operating under shariah. I challenge any of you to show me such a place. There is riba/interest in all of the land so please point out any ruler operating under true shariah. So this statement is a misleading one. None of the rulers operate under Islamic law anymore except maybe the Taliban and all these same scholars told us after 2001 they were bad yet in the 80s and 90s they mujahideen. So even this scholar has misguided most of you. Stop giving out the western approved version of Islam and give the real one
Ok Daeshi
True bro. Exactly on point
You say them mujahideen , you do grave worshipping which is a major shirk , countless newly invented matters for Worshipping which is bida'ah and The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) used to say, when beginning a khutbah (sermon): " The best of speech is the Book of Allah and the best of guidance is the guidance of Muhammad. The worst of things are those which are newly-invented, and every innovation is a going astray" (reported by Muslim, no. 867) . Yet there are some who leave this hadith and catch onto the weak and fabricated hadiths.
If you know how shia was formed ( by a jew ) you can find out the how today's deen is divided and manipulated thinking the scholars of the sunnah from masjid-al-nabawi and masjid-al-haram are misguided, mujahideen etc , نَعُوْذُ بِاللهِ those are two of the most holiest places till The day of Judgement and if you think the scholars from there are misguided please make lot's of Dua ( without any partners , shirks ) .
May Allah guide you.
@@rMeRUEM no thank you for the lecture, have you been to Afghanistan? Have you been to the two holy cities? Unless you have seen things first hand and not hearsay or TH-cam then you are just talking nonsense. The two holy cities are protected not the scholars who reside there and misguided Muslims, the problem with saying the Taliban are grave worshipers is you haven't been there and you haven't seen it first hand. Riba is one of the largest sins according to the Quran and Sunnah and the two holy cities practice it openly. Please don't lecture me without any knowledge or insights.
@@religiousConservative may Allah guide us.
comment section literally filled with khawarij, no one realizes that their aqeedah is kufri and misguidance. Like guys at least for the sake of Allah just realize that they takfir you and your children, don't be ignorant to these kinds of things.
You are describing yourself crybaby
Yes, we tkfr anyone who says anyone who legislates in contradiction to Sharia, who makes halal what is haram, is a disbeliever. A person who drinks alcohol is a sinner, a ruler who legislates that alcohol can be drunk without being punished, is a disbeliever.
@@-------....___ True but these people will not understand until they are in Jahannam, because their hearts are blind and there is no point to talk nice to them
@@Herbert_Rudolf They seem to hate the Shia Rafidi the most, but they are the only sect that is most similar to them.
Rafidi w0r.ship Imams, these people do the same with rulers and scholars.
Always remember, if a murji'a/madkhali calls you khawarij, you know you are on the right path.
Oh sooooooo sorrrry our aqeedah is not according to munafiq bin shaytaan or Sheik Shakiraa or Sheik John Cena
Too many scholars for dollars. Umma is in bad state at the moment
Subhanallah you are someone who never even opened a book of
Knowledge but somehow still think you are qualified to call scholar “scholars of dollar”
@md-xe8uf what truth do you see that other don't see what vision x pro has allah given you that others don't have but seriously tell me what makes you think he is ulama of dollar he is a respected scholar who spent his life serving Islam but some uneducated unqualified brothers like you who reads one article or watch one video starts going around and labeling people
@@ibshelby3643 Yes, he is such a great scholar that he preaches obedience to Taghut instead of Allah SWT. GG
@@-------....___ our properht saw commend us to to obey the ruler here is the proof Narrated by Abu Huraira:
The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) said:
"Whoever obeys me, obeys Allah, and whoever disobeys me, disobeys Allah. Whoever obeys the ruler, obeys me, and whoever disobeys the ruler, disobeys me." and there is no scholar alive today that focuses on tawheed as much as he does . so don't talk about stuff u don't know matter of I'm willing to challenge u to a debate if u r man enough to back up what u r saying
@@ibshelby3643 yes, Muslim ruler, Muslim Amir. Abu Bakr RA said there can only be one ruler of the ummah, not multiple. Nationalism is kufr yes? Secularism is kufr yes? Or do you follow Hadith (without understanding) and discard the Quran?
Scholars for dollars
Heh. Yet another Kharajite who can’t even attempt an adult argument. Nothing but childish insults. It makes it OBVIOUS you are fools.
@@Scott-Eesa Cant argue with madkhali murji'a who just want to be obedient to taghut
His propaganda serves as evidence to the truth of the allegation.
What this great scholar propagates is What Allah said, what the prophet ﷺ said, what the sahaba and righteous salaf said, if you have a problem with this you have a problem with what i listed.
In your ideal world we shouldn't trust any scholar except for own feelings am I right ? Khariji mindset right there.
@@kab1r We shouldn't trust blindly any scholar who is paid by these monarchies.
Or show me fatwas from these scholars calling for unity of the muslims under a Caliphate. A Caliphate, as said by scholar Ibn Taymmiyah, is an OBLIGATION for every muslim. Where are their fatwas for the muslims to unite?
When certain countries had issues with Qatar, these 'scholars' were quick to condemn Qatar.
@@-------....___ What Caliphate ? Are you mentally unstable ? Only the Quraysh can take on that position. We have leaders who rule by the Quran and Sunnah, and if they do wrong we should pray for their guidance. How should muslims unite except by tawheed. You people act like a caliphate would bring peace to the world which doesnt even makes sense. It says obey Allah and his messenger and those with authority, not Allah the messenger and the caliphs. Would you pls prove your statement that the scholars are getting paid to divide the people. Because that is what i understood from your comment. Who said that anyone is blindly following anyone ? He quotes the Quran and the Sunnah by the Manhaj of the Salaf. If you got a problem with that, you got a Aqeedah issue.
@@AlMulk21 typical madkhali words. Manhaj of the Salaf. Quran and Sunnah.
Who said if leaders rule by other than Quran and Sunnah, you can only pray for their guidance LOL? Is that what the Sahabah did?
My point was clear. A caliphate can be ruled by a caliph, Amir, or imam. Even a king.
Muslims should unite under a single ruler, call him whatever you want. This is in line with Quran. Do not divide, stick with the main body.
There are many Hadiths and Quran verses about ummah being United. Many old scholars said caliphate is an obligation. Many old scholars said there can only be one ruler of the muslims, and it is forbidden to have two rulers (Abu Bakr RA). Many old scholars said Muslim land cannot be segregated, it is forbidden.
So, where are the scholars forcing this? Instead the scholars only force ‘obey the ruler’ especially when those Hadith are meant for a caliph, Amir, or imam of the muslims.
Talking to you madkhalis gives me a headache honestly.
Honestly stop with the ‘aqeedah’ and ‘manhaj of the Salaf’. These words are nice but the madkhali are far away from it. Madkhali meaning the bootlickers like you. If Sahabah were alive today, you would be the first people they would go after. Hypocrites acting like gatekeepers of Islam.
Agents of Khilafah....but is there
khilafah in Saudia
There is no more khilafah Saudi is a monarchy
@@coffe2270 And you will give them your 0.mk if they ask for it, right?
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Classic. Bro gives no reference from the Quran or sunnah and continues to give fatwas
Because it is a simple answer to the 3ammah, if you want evidence nobody forbade you from looking into his books and other scholars books or even heading to the search bar.
@@aminmez119 no he'll never quote anything from the Sunnah about this matter because there is nothing that supports his argument.
@@NotUrDJ I have enough evidence to refute the question let alone a grand scholar.
@@aminmez119 so do I , in favor of the question.
@@NotUrDJ alright bring the evidence 🧾, I don't need evidence to say I'm bootliking the government rather the one accusing me of it should bring it forth.
The Arabs revolted against the ottoman caliph. The sauds and sharif hussein is khariji
You are one of them I assume by what you're trying to get at
@@aminmez119so is he lying? Did the Arabs not revolt against the last Caliphate? You know what the disbelievers said was their biggest goal that they achieved? The state of Israel between the Muslims, and Arab nationalism to destroy the caliphate and make the ummah weak. I wonder what they meant.
Ironically they don't talk about that
Modern day Saudi monarchy is worse than anyone
Do you hate Arabs? The people from whom the prophet Mohammed was send? The people of Mekka and Madina? The people of tawheed? You Know that the ottomans were sufis right? There are meany sufi sects that do graveworshipping, one of their sects believe Allah is everywhere another thinks all they see is Allah, these are all sufis, where do you see this belief in Saudia?d@@-------....___
So in your eyes Turks and Serbs are good and Arabs are bad? Cuz you don't say Saudi people you flat out say Arabs like the kuffars like to say it. The Arabs are the grand children of Sahaba and are the people from whom the prophet mohammed got send. People of mekkah and medinah.