Except this does NOT look realistic. Too curvy, not enough angulation, needs more subtle rendering. You need to master the fundamentals before you post on TH-cam on how to do something when you are CLEARLY still in the beginner's ( STUDENT ) stage.
1. Who even are you? 2. Your critisism is not constructive, and pointedly agressive for no reason. 3. As figurative art goes, this qualifies as a "realistic style", unless you're going for something that is completely photorealistic, which is a very very different rendering, style, and approach, this is absolutely in a "realistic" category. 4. As with any artistic depiction, you will sometimes have more or less convincing elements, I find this drawing be well executed. The neck may be a tiny bit off, but I haven't seen the reference, if there is one, so who am I to say. 5. Being a beginner in drawing is a very concrete stage in which an approach to form, light, line density and strength has not been undertaken in the slightest. In this drawing, and in this persons case, we have an approach of understanding of form (the facial traits are generally where they should be, they are broken down into their basic shapes and constructed with contour, shading, blending and rendering. A light source is clear and defined, well evidenced. And line strength and density seems to be understood in the placement of certain strokes. So overall this person is absolutely not a beginner, much more in a intermediate, advanced or even further level. 6. As someone who teaches myself, your approach to giving critisism is terrible. This person's work is good, and that's undeniable. Your comment is pretty much someone who can't draw themselves, watches too much Proko, and who believes that they know better then people who actually create work. So in conclusion, maybe stop calling other people students, concentrate on bettering yourself, and less on tearing down others to make yourself feel better. Ciao.
@@marcusaurelius1138 the fact that I suggested to them that they need more angulation and rendering was CONSTRUCTIVE criticism. YOU just have piss poor comprehension. NOW, wtf are YOU coming on here virtue signaling and coming to defend their honor as if they NEEDED you to do so? This is an A and B conversation so See your way out and mind your business! And it still stands whether you are a teacher or not that this is student grade level work and NOT intermediate at all. Go look at examples from Ateliers where you will ACTUALLY see intermediate and ADVANCED work bc this ain't it. Also, your little jib at Proko tells me all that I need about someone like you and your skill level as well proficiency in teaching art......or lack thereof. You are dismissed!
@@marcusaurelius1138 He might be a little harsh, but he has a point. I feel the nose is too round, the lips are too tilted and the eyes aren't looking in the same direction. The shading is quite decent tho
1:02 This is about as realistic as I can make my drawings 💀
Hi, how long did it take to complete?
The neck...
Thank you
Except this does NOT look realistic. Too curvy, not enough angulation, needs more subtle rendering. You need to master the fundamentals before you post on TH-cam on how to do something when you are CLEARLY still in the beginner's ( STUDENT ) stage.
1. Who even are you?
2. Your critisism is not constructive, and pointedly agressive for no reason.
3. As figurative art goes, this qualifies as a "realistic style", unless you're going for something that is completely photorealistic, which is a very very different rendering, style, and approach, this is absolutely in a "realistic" category.
4. As with any artistic depiction, you will sometimes have more or less convincing elements, I find this drawing be well executed. The neck may be a tiny bit off, but I haven't seen the reference, if there is one, so who am I to say.
5. Being a beginner in drawing is a very concrete stage in which an approach to form, light, line density and strength has not been undertaken in the slightest. In this drawing, and in this persons case, we have an approach of understanding of form (the facial traits are generally where they should be, they are broken down into their basic shapes and constructed with contour, shading, blending and rendering. A light source is clear and defined, well evidenced. And line strength and density seems to be understood in the placement of certain strokes. So overall this person is absolutely not a beginner, much more in a intermediate, advanced or even further level.
6. As someone who teaches myself, your approach to giving critisism is terrible. This person's work is good, and that's undeniable. Your comment is pretty much someone who can't draw themselves, watches too much Proko, and who believes that they know better then people who actually create work. So in conclusion, maybe stop calling other people students, concentrate on bettering yourself, and less on tearing down others to make yourself feel better.
Ciao.
@@marcusaurelius1138 the fact that I suggested to them that they need more angulation and rendering was CONSTRUCTIVE criticism. YOU just have piss poor comprehension. NOW, wtf are YOU coming on here virtue signaling and coming to defend their honor as if they NEEDED you to do so? This is an A and B conversation so See your way out and mind your business! And it still stands whether you are a teacher or not that this is student grade level work and NOT intermediate at all. Go look at examples from Ateliers where you will ACTUALLY see intermediate and ADVANCED work bc this ain't it.
Also, your little jib at Proko tells me all that I need about someone like you and your skill level as well proficiency in teaching art......or lack thereof. You are dismissed!
@@marcusaurelius1138 He might be a little harsh, but he has a point. I feel the nose is too round, the lips are too tilted and the eyes aren't looking in the same direction. The shading is quite decent tho