This shows how weak your assertions are... berating CHILDREN to get them to follow your stupid superstition. Let's ask the right question: why do you think it's so important to use logical fallacies when your superstition is challenged?
Thanks for watching my video. First, these are not children but young men and women. Second, there was no berating going on. Third, please show me where my logical fallacies are. Have a good day.
@@PatrickTube644 "irst, these are not children but young men and women." Targeting "young men and women" sounds like you would be better off eh? "Third, please show me where my logical fallacies are" From the strawman (misrepresenting the field of cosmology), your insistence on circular reasoning (using an iron age fable as your only source.. what are you thinking.. are you thinking?) and of course the obvious argument from ignorance, you can't posit without fallacy. You will not reply without argument or fallacy, this shows how weak your assertions are. You are still attacking children with misinformation, one wonders why you feel the need. It's like.. unless they are wholly uneducated or irrational, you can't provide anything of value. Go on, provide something without logical fallacy or argument. LOL Something says you can't.. nothing of value.
This shows how weak your assertions are... berating CHILDREN to get them to follow your stupid superstition.
Let's ask the right question: why do you think it's so important to use logical fallacies when your superstition is challenged?
Thanks for watching my video. First, these are not children but young men and women. Second, there was no berating going on. Third, please show me where my logical fallacies are. Have a good day.
@@PatrickTube644 "irst, these are not children but young men and women." Targeting "young men and women" sounds like you would be better off eh?
"Third, please show me where my logical fallacies are" From the strawman (misrepresenting the field of cosmology), your insistence on circular reasoning (using an iron age fable as your only source.. what are you thinking.. are you thinking?) and of course the obvious argument from ignorance, you can't posit without fallacy. You will not reply without argument or fallacy, this shows how weak your assertions are. You are still attacking children with misinformation, one wonders why you feel the need. It's like.. unless they are wholly uneducated or irrational, you can't provide anything of value. Go on, provide something without logical fallacy or argument. LOL Something says you can't.. nothing of value.