One of the best TH-cam reviews I have ever watched!. Great job! Great audio, honest slow talk, pauses between sentences. Very enjoyable , don't change a thing what you do.
Thank you so much! I had paid money for the 90 but after this video I'll pay the store some more for the 180. I would have really felt terrible had I watched this video after purchasing the 90. Thank you for saving my life.
Amazingly thorough review. Really helpful. Also addressed my burning question which was should I spring for the next model and what would I get for the extra money. Thank you so much for taking the time to do this.
Excellent review. Thanks for taking the time to do this. I wasn't even aware of the HC-X1. Looks like I need to do some more research. Thanks again for taking the time to do such a thorough review. It was time well spent.
Simply need to say that I love your videoes to bits! You're awesome to listen to, thank you very much. I am so glad to have stumpled onto your channel. Keep up your fantastic work mate!
I have not tried the AX100 so I can't sensibly comment however they are very distinctly different camcorders in price and in purpose so they're not really comparable as the likely applications would be different.
I REALLY REALLY love this review! Best review of this camera (as well as the HC X1, wich is pretty much the same but better). Thanks a lot for your time and your reviews, i learned and enjoyed a lot with them. Its now 2020 but i´m gonna buy a HC X1. By the way, the place wher you made this review... Love it! Nice and comfortable kitchen.
Great review! I just returned a Canon G50 thru Amazon... I got what I paid for...... These Panasonics offer so much more and the price has come down since your initial review. Which would you chose between the Sony AX700 and the Panasonic HC X1??? Thanks again for your review!!
Very keen to see where the HC-X1e sits in this. It does appear to be much more than just an updated HC-X1000. I have pre ordered one so fingers crossed...
Thank You! Great review and pretty much made me comfortable in buying this camera before actually physically playing with it. I have no use for 4K in tight spaces in my work for the foreseeable future so this will work out great. Thank you also for answering my confusion about the HC-X1. Unfortunately, as another viewer mentioned, it's currently $1100 more than the UX90 and only $300 less than the UX180 in the US. The view finder not being able to flip sideways will annoy me, but I do have an external 7" HDMI monitor if I really need to get away from behind it.
Thank you SO MUCH for mention the UX-180 AND the HC-X1 in this review. As I am looking at them all and was confused about so many choices in the same price range.
oh, the HC-X1 look EXACTLY the same on the outside. (except fo the 20x lens marking ...) Wow - and IS part of the pro division, it appears. and what da heck is this HC-X1000? another choice? argh!
Very nice review, gave me some information I had missed, and a lot of things to think about. I looked up the HC-X1, in the US is runs around $3200, while the UX180 is about $3500, which makes much more sense considering that you said the only real difference is the SDI output.
The HC-X1 comes with sensor next to the viewfinder that turns off the pullout screen when is senses the person wanting to look through the viewfinder. It had me thinking i had a bad unit as i was sitting in my truck. my shoulder kept tripping the sensor and pullout screen kept shutting off. there is also a switch to turn off the sensor (nice)! I think Panasonic was listening. Cheers!
Very well done! I recently ran into the "4K mode unwanted zoom" feature with my new Canon 5D Mark IV. This was a surprise I was not happy about. Looks like I'll save my pennies for the HC-X1. It solves the unwanted crop and the fewer frame rate options issues. Thank you for the informative review!
I was toying with buying the HC-X1 again myself a couple of days ago; really is very well featured although of course very different to shooting with a 5D or any "DSLR"-type camera. Glad you liked the review.
Too many caveats IMO. Compared to the things you disliked on the Panasonic, your review of the HXR-NX100 was a perfect camcorder by comparison. BTW, I contacted B&H Photo in NYC and they have sold many of those to the point where it was constantly out of stock. In addition, the price on it has fallen to boot. Most people who bought it raved about it. The only occasional complaint was concerning the AF. Others still said the AF performed very well. I'm still saving for that one. I'll probably pull the trigger in early 2017 as I'll need enough money for all the accessories I'll require. Glad to see Panasonic loaned you one to test and review. You have a gift my friend. Well done!
Thank you! The UX90 is nice but definitely the HC-X1 or UX180 is the one to buy in most cases, I would suggest. And yes, the NX100 is a great little cam. Cheaper now, you say?!
When originally released in the U.S.A the NX100 was $1699. Now, it's a mere $1599.95 U.S. I'm in Canada and despite the exchange rate, I'd still pay more for it here as of today , as well as quite a bit more for accessories. Canadian stores cannot or will not compete with U.S superstores.
I was dead set on the AG UX90 until I watched this video. Now the front runner is the HC X1 (thanks by the way). But you made the comment about the HDMI SD out not being available in the X1. I'm a bit of a newbie and and not clear what that means or how it "may" limit me. FYI, my main use for this camera is for documentaries: interviews, handheld cinema verite, run and gun, yada, yada, yada.... Thanks much!
You're confusing two things; HDMI out and SDI out are two different ways of getting video out of the camcorder. As I recall (and it was a while aho I made this so best to check what I'm saying) both camcorders have HDMI out but only the UX180 has SDI out. If you don't know what SDI out is, you almost certainly don't need it - it's a pro-format BNC connection typically used for connecting to other broadcast gear eg if you were to feed a live sat truck for example, or some external recorders (though they can usually take the HDMI feed as well)
Thanks, UKAirscape. Yeah, after I wrote the comment I realized I inadvertently stated HDMI. But you definitely cleared things up re: SDI, which was my primary question. So thanks a lot!!
Quick question, how does the UX180 compare to the DVX200, similar price (with the rebate) but much larger sensor. Also the HC-X1 is $3,200 in America, a full $1,100 more than the UX90.
Yes, various people have said that now; such an odd pricing difference over there. DVX is more doco/drama oriented I suppose, the UX more ENG/run-n-gun.
Great review! The low light shows very little noise even at 20db gain, much better than my GH4.. Does theAG-UX90 have a lanc input for a zoom control like a varizoom? Im not finding that info on B&H listing. thx
Great review. Thinking of PX'ing my HC-X1000 (which I love ) for the upcoming X1.Hope you will review. Particularly whether the DOF is shallower at full aperture on the X1 compared to the X1000. Hope you might be able to test this at some point. Thanks.
Unfortunately, I won't be getting an HC-X1 to test because Panasonic's consumer division never talk to me, unlike their pro division. I might be able to wangle a UX180 which is essentially the same though.
Hi, oh! Nicely done - saved the best to last! And, I think I've got this right, the consumer version can output H264 in an MP4 container as well as as MOV (terrible memory these days). What I don't know is if that is particularly significant. Any comment welcome! Bob
A most excellent review with the unfortunate side affect of me now wanting to spend more, but my money tree is bare. While I've filmed lectures for a few years now I'm new to the pro level cameras so have done a couple of months online research. It'll be a big purchase for me and will be an all rounder camera. Your video is the best review of any pro camera I've seen in all that research. It was good to hear the real faults and a comparison to other models. You actually mentioned other models. I've noticed it is very hard finding a footing to start learinging the various camera models available when you don't know what actually exists! So thanks for that. If I had the money I'd absolutely get the X1 or 180 after that. I'll probably still get the UX90 but at least now I have a better realisation of the wide angle issue. That's the only real issue that will annoy me, and yet the 1080 it produces is still miles ahead of the small sensor cameras I've been using so I can't really complain. Thanks again.
Thanks for the heads-up on the cameras. I have the HC-X 1000, terrible in low light. I am hoping to sell my HC-X1000 and my X920 (superb HD camera) to get a used HC X1. I do also use a Sony A6300, magnificent in low light 4k, but it's not a video camera so limited to 30 minute recording. Oh, plus battery life poor and it overheats even in our cold UK. I hope the HC X1 is as good as the Sony A6300.
I think that might be an optimistic hope in pure low light terms not least because you can put a faster lens on the Sony and (I think, from memory) it has a bigger sensor. Also, I've generally found Sony stuff to be very good in low light, with clever noise reduction when you add gain. But the X1 should be better than the older model I think.
wow, thank you kind sir for your educated reply. I think I have been getting excited for nothing by the sound of it. The HC-X1 is now retailing for about £2100 (on-line) they were £2600 ish, I was very disappointed with the low light performance of the X1000 and this was made worse by the release of the X1 within 6 months of me buying the X1000. The Alpha 6300 is just magic in low light, i.e. weddings in medieval churches, wedding receptions, first dance etc but they A/ Overheat, B/ record for 30 minutes which is no good for a traditional English wedding and C/ the batteries last about 40 minutes. Finally, may I ask what model Sony video camera I should maybe consider? is that maybe the 700 ? i forget the letters. Incidentally, my trusty HC-X920 HD camera performed very well in low light. Thank you very much indeed.
Sony don't have a great deal of stuff at a similar price point to the Panny as I recall. I've just bought an NX80 which is "decent" in dim light but probably still not a patch on a DSLR-type camera. It's also a little ergonomically challenged due to having only a single lens ring. Maybe the Z150 might be up your street? Bear in mind these camcorders won't give you that super shallow depth of field for "pretty" pictures like the A6300 will either.
Thank you again for your recommendations. I actually found A Sony Z100 on ebay, no used Z150's at the mo. I may just bite the bullet and like you say, the Panasonic HC-X1 has to be better than the X1000. I lost out on this camera the other day, I'm pretty sure they were over £4000 new, didn't realise they are micro 4/3rds sensor www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Panasonic-AG-DVX200-4K-Professional-Camcorder/253584463863?ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT&_trksid=p2060353.m1438.l2649
well the HC-x1 is finally available and I am all ready to get one. And it is all thanks to your guidance. I am curious if you have tried to mix footage from this with a G7 or GH4 panasonic? What did you think of matching them in post? I am gonna sell all of my canon lenses and gear to get this and either g7 or gh4 to go with it. Thanks again!
+shawn wright Steady now, don't just take my word for it! Please do check its right for you. Just because I like it doesn't mean you will :-) Quite extreme to dump your prior gear. No, I have not tried matching it to the G7 or GH4 so I can't comment on matching them, sorry.
Good review. Very informative. Will have to watch it again to absord it all. Hadn't appreciated the difference in 4K field of view between the different models (DVX200, X1, UX180 and UX90). I'm mainly after UHD at 60fps to load to TH-cam so I guess X1 or UX180 is best for me. I'm a sucker for bling though and my brand is red so would be difficult not to go for he 200 :>) Cheers Dom (Essential RC)
This video got me interested in the UX cameras when you posted it, and at the end of 2019 I purchased an open box UX180 from a place that does service and repair work for B&H Photo - $1,950. It was perfect, not a mark on it. Its a sweet camera! It seemed to me that if Panasonic ever updates the DVX200 to make it a tad lighter and more well balanced (an other image related updates) then I would consider a NEW camcorder but not much else interests me right now. Between my GH5 and the 180 all my boxes are checked off for now.
Not sure what you want my thoughts on exactly, sorry. It'd be a huge step up from an S-video camcorder. I've never used HDMI extenders, can't comment on those.
Thank you very much, I really liked your pxw-x70, and now this one is also great, very practical. Do you have any plans for reviewing ux180 as well, any soon? I understand that its shipping will start in Dec.
By the way, except that missing port, is there any technical differences between HC-X1 and UX180 you are aware of? (I have heard something about the processor differences from a friend but I doubt it, I checked specs for both I did not find anything except : "4K High-Speed Processing LSI" equally for both. Thank you in advance :)
I don't think so. It's my understanding that that is the main difference between the two. But you can get the HC X1, which doesn't crop in 4k for only a few hundred dollars more. It doesn't have an HD SDI out (whatever that means), but everything else - on the camera at least - seems to be the same.
He addresses my main issue with upgrading. when I was in my 30's I used the hvx200a and loved it but now I am in my 50's have shaky hands now and I hate the ax53 not because it is bad but because the BOOS stabilization is magical and has spoiled me. I cannot overstate how great it is. My shoots do not allow time to fool with external gimbals but I can afford this camera and I would love to have more control over the exposure which the ax53 lacks but I cannot give up the BOSS stabilization. It is a lot easier to adjust exposure in post if I need to which is rare then fix shaky camera shots. I shoot audio on a recorder off camera so the lack of audio features on the ax53 is not an issue. I hope Sony puts "BOSS" in a more pro camera like this one soon.
Hello Sir, i don't really understand why you only have such small number of subscribers. while are crappy review channels have thousands or even millions. it's somewhat weird!! That's by far the most detailed and unbiased review of a digital product i've ever seen on youtube. really!! without those fancy useless intros and effects. you should definitely do more reviews and request more products to review from brands. i easily see you as a top youtube reviewer if you dedicate yourself to that specific niche. anyway, your input on this was much appreciated! i was planning to buy this camcorder, but your point about cropped 4k just saved me from purchasing an item that will not suit my needs. i'm looking for a good IQ and low light performance 1inch sensor compact camcorder. Until now, i didn't find one that checks all these boxes altogether. was looking into the Sony ax700/nx80 but seen on another review that it's not that good in low light, plus it doesn't do 4K 60p. so i'm still searching for something that can do the job and be future proof. will check the Panasonic HC X1 that you mentioned in the end and see if i can deal with it given it's bulky design. Meanwhile, if you have any suggestion about a newer compact model, from any brand, that delivers good performance in all aspects while still keeping a compact size, please advise accordingly. Thank you sir for your valuable time, you just got a new subscriber and looking forward to other reviews from you! Keep it up, you're the best! Respect from Morocco!
Thank you. The NX80 does reasonably well in low light, I think, compared to similar cameras of similar price etc but you're right it does not do 50/60p. The HC-X1 does not do well in low light (much like the UX90), like a lot of Panasonic's entry-level pro camcorders. An entry-level but fully-featured and good quality camcorder is impossible to find!
First of all thank you very much for your contributions, I would like to ask you if the hc-x1 will not be an update of the x1000, and if it behaves well in low light, that in x1000 was highly criticized, and also thank you for your opinion 4.2.0 to 8 bits, and its comparison to the sony z-150. Thanks for your kindness.
The HC-X1 is as described in the video; it appears to be a consumer-branded version of the AG-UX180. What relation it has to the X1000 I cannot say. The low light would presumably be as shown in this video since I believe all three use the same sensor, though the X1 / UX180 do use a different lens so I can't be certain of the low light ability. I don't know what you mean about my opinion on "4:2:0 to 8 bits". I cannot compare with the Z150 as I have not used it.
Ah. I suppose that depends on how critical you are. 10 bit 4:2:2 will inevitably hold up better but it doesn't mean you can't tweak something that's 8/4:2:0 a bit.
Great video, very informative even almost 4 years later. But exactly because of these 4 years, I would like to ask if the X1 is still, in your opinion, a good buy for those who want to cover events and fairs. Is there a better alternative for a similar price? I work with GH5 and GH4 in small web commercials. But I miss a typical run and gun camcorder, with good audio, practicality and quality. I would appreciate hearing your opinion. Thank you!
Of the two camcorders, the HC-X1 was and remains the better. In terms of more modern camcorders, there's been very little development recently, they seem to be out of fashion, so the UX90 and X1 are still Panasonic's offerings at that sort of price range. I like them in many ways but they're not good in dim light, bit grainy.
Thank you from south-France for this review, but is the ag-ux90 better in low lights than hc x1. My job is video recording of musicians, actors with sometimes very bad lightning. Please, excuse-me for my english Thanks
Unfortunately I have not tested the HC-X1 so I cannot give you the comparison. Sorry. I don't think either camcorder is particularly good in low light though.
Ux90 is bad in low light. In your experience which parameters are BEST to film in low light? Flou (F2) or cine V (F5)? I usually rec in shutter 25, cine V ,12gain but the imagen dont have definition.
Excellent review, and your explanations were really helpful to a chap like me, who makes films for amateur creativity only. I was looking at the UX180 to replace my old Sony Z5, but with HC-X1 running at about £900 less, I would like to ask what the lack of SDI output and Timecode functions will mean to someone like me, who rarely films something with another cam at the same time. Kind regards, Billy
Hi! Great review. Can you help me ? I'm choosing my new camcorder. I need to make advertising/commercials spot-TV, and industrial videos. I'll use it primarily in HD, but i prefer buying a 4k model to not miss any (few) opportunities (in 4k/UHD). Which camcorder would you recommend between Panasonic AG-UX 90 and JVC HM200E ? Thanks and ciao from Italy!
Hang on; you do realise that 30p should not automatically be considered better than 25p don't you? They're different frame rates to suit the different TV standards around the world. 25 is the PAL (European - including Italy!) standard whereas 300 is for NTSC countries like the USA. So if you're going to shoot for TV, you can forget 30; you need to shoot 25/50. Only if you exclusively and totally shoot for computers / the Internet would you get away with filming 30p in a European country. Any DVDs, Blu-rays or TV work will expect 25. In fact, they'll probably still want 50i (25 interlaced frames). Yes, you could shoot 30 and downsample the frame rate but this looks terrible and jerky (because 29.97 fps - which is what 30fps actually is - does not divide neatly into 25 fps!) The JVC has poor focus (both at small and wide apertures, if I recall correctly) and the lens wasn't parfocal. It was troublesome to get crisp focus and that's a serious issue. The iris ramps downn significantly when zooming, which was irritating also. The JVC's slightly wider angle (29.5 vs 34.5) is still not what I'd call wide angle (compared to the UX180's 25mm for example) and if it were my money, I'd put a wide angle lens adapter on the UX90 rather than buy the JVC.
Well, you answered all my questions. Your explanation is very precise and exhaustive. I have no more doubts to choose Panasonic. Thank you for your time, bye!
Pretty much any camcorder can do it, albeit that if you're shooting from the side of the pitch you're going to end up with a lot of "wasted space" below and above (because the pitch will be a lot wider than the height of the action). You'd simply need to move the camera back until the entire pitch comes into view. Clearly the wider-angle lens the camcorder has, the easier (less far back) this becomes. So it depends what budget you have and how able you are to move the camera to a suitable location. Being higher up and looking down will give you a fuller image since more of the height would be used (a bit like the shots from the end of a tennis court give you more action that a pure side-on shot would)
Hello: nice review. I heard from another review about problems with the option of using two sd-cards in one time (both cards should record simultaneously, as backup) - the man said, the camera froze. For work I prefer the other method when one starts recording when the other one is full... What is your experience with using two cards in any case - any problems? Thanks.
Hello. Unfortunately I didn't test that as I only had the camcorder on loan for review and took it at face value that it should work. I would presume that if there was a fault in this function then Panasonic would have to come up with a firmware update pretty soonish to address it, as it would be a substantial failing.
Hi again! I need a new camcorder for work - I got an AG-DVX100BE (tapes! 9 years old) - Full HD should be sufficient for youtube videos. I can´t decide between AG-UX90 and HC-X1 - what do you think? Thanks for helping!
The HC-X1 is far more highly specified and if I had the money to choose either it would be the one to go for. Not to be confused with the older HC-X1000 model mind you...
chiedo se quella che hai presentato è la UX 90 ? sono molto indeciso quale camcorder comprare , mi puoi dire se è un ottimo acquisto la AG UX90 oppure mi consigli un altro prodotto ...ciao e grazie
But wait.... doing more research it seems the 180 has more slow mo speeds than the x1 - correct? There are more differences than just DV out right? I appreciate your help.
UKAirscape okay that is good to know. I wish there was a Panasonic dealer near me where I could try this out and ask detailed questions. Do you happen to have a contact at Panasonic who in turn has a contact here in the USA?
Hi, first time viewer and soon to be first time camcorder owner. I will be using my camcorder exclusively for wildlife filming, I was wondering if the addition of focal length when switching to 4K on the UX90 extends throughout the range? My poor grasp of mathematics seems to suggest that if it does the effective maximum zoom would extend beyond that of the UX180/HC-X1. BTW, absolutely first class video. Clear, concise and above all useful information. Thank you.
Yes, it's a 15x zoom regardless of where you start, so in UHD mode it's 35.4 mm to 531.0 mm (in 35mm equivalence terms, which is how these things are stated). The HC-X1 / UX180 has a 20x zoom but starts from 25 .4, so goes 25.4 ― 508.0 mm. It is, as you say, ever so slightly less on the telephoto end. Thanks for the kind words about the video!
Hi, I'm writing from Spain, thanks for your tutorials, I have a big doubt that is driving me crazy and I'm worried, I've always recorded video with DSLR Canon 5d and 7d, and I have doubts between two models to make movies, prx-x70 or Panasonic ag-ux90, and I would like to know your impressions about which to choose since I want a look or film aesthetics. By theme of codecs and other characteristics, or perhaps another model or brand of price similar or even cheaper. thank you very much
But for the comfort of sound inputs and focus had idea of video camera instead of dslr, but I do not know what model you advise me with a cinema look. Thanks for your answer.
OK. Well, most camcorders around that price range don't have a "cinema" look because that's not what they're designed for. Unless you're talking big-budget units like Sony's F55, camcorders tend to be more TV-oriented. So you have a bit of a problem. That said, if the camcorder shoots a nice image, you can always colour grade and crop the image and make it look cinematic in the edit. After all, what does "cinematic" really mean anyway... there have been cinema films shot on DV camcorders! At your budget I'm going to suggest an oddball idea; the Canon XC-15. This is an update of the XC10 which a lot of people thought was terrible (though a lot of people who bought it seemed happy enough). I'm suggesting it because it shoots very high bitrate 4K at 24p, has an XLR audio interface and has film "looks" from the Canon C300 built-in. Specwise, it shoots 4K video to CFast cards in an MXF wrapper at up to 305 Mbps in an H.264-based, IntraFrame, 4:2:2, 8-bit codec; while 1080p video writes to SD cards at up to 50 Mbps in an H.264-based, Long-GOP, 4:2:2, 8-bit codec. Bear in mind those CFast cards are quite costly. Also, a massive disclaimer: I have never used or even seen this camera. But it is an interesting hybrid between a DSLR-style (albeit with a fixed lens) and a camcorder functionality. Take a look at the spec (and reviews) on www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1278108-REG/canon_1456c002_xc15_4k_professional_camcorder.html
We often think that cameras like this are an all-in-one solution. Unfortunately that is rarely the case. You are likely to need a monitor. I have been using this type of camera for many years. I always use a recorder/monitor partially I shoot long events. Staring at the 3.5 screen all day really sucks.
Informative video but I am struggling with maintaining focus. I'm looking for help. Is there a way to set the UX90 to track a subject and keep it in focus? I have seen advertising videos boasting that the UX series (90 and 180) do this but I can FIND NO INSTRUCTION on how to set it. I do a lot of off center interviews and a very bothered by the focus shifting to the background, I'm finding 'manual everything' is the only way to control this. I hate shifting focus, exposure and color. Is there anyway around this with tracking or focus lock?
It's a long time since I had this camcorder on loan for review so I can't help with whether it has auto tracking but I think honestly if you're doing interviews where you and the subject remain static then you're much better off using manual focus and setting it correctly by yourself anyway. Ditto exposure and white balance. Auto is really best suited to "run and gun" situations where you literally wouldn't have time to set them youself while simultaneously chasing the shot.
interesting review. Now more confused as to what to do now:-) looking for a 2nd camera. Current one is an AC90. Tempted just to find another one of those (cheap) rather than the UX90 and make the UX90 the main camera. I do corporate, interviews documentary etc.
If you're happy with the AC90 and can find a good one, cheap, as long as they do what you need, stick with it. No need to spend money when you don't have to :-)
well that advice has just saved me £1000 :-) Talking to the Panasonic Guru in another place the problem I would have with a mix of AC90 &UX90 is colour matching (due to completely different sensor technologies). with 2* AC90 I should be able to cut between the two with minim fuss. Also it means I only have to memories & lear 1 set of camera controls and not two similar but different ones.
@@UKAirscape three years on and I need a third camera ( I have 2 AC90's) With the AG-UX180 now down to £2395 (exVat) is your advice still to go to the HC-1X (at about £1700 ex-Vat)
It seems to me that unless you specifically need the UX180's features (which I now cannot remember as it's been so long) then the HC-X1 did pretty much everything the UX180 did as I recall so of the two, that would be a better buy.
I am thinking compare this UX camcorder to FZ2500 , same lens for 2 products , but any 4k crop problem in FZ2500 ?? is it very close spec between the UX90 to FZ2500 ? If I don't need some ENG feature like 3 rings stuff, may I go to FZ2500 ?
It depends how low you mean and what your expectations are. I thought I discussed low light ability during the review and gave examples. If I didn't, see my other review at th-cam.com/video/CKm6TSV-isU/w-d-xo.html
How is the auto focus? would this be a good camcorder to record lectures, sometimes with in low light situations., would auto focus find the speaker and stay on the speakers face? And how is the low light performance, if the lighting is not the best or if the speaker is back lit, or if lighting is bad?
@@UKAirscape I've had a chance to experiment with this camera in the last week. I agree with you re: low light situation ... I've found just shooting in regular room situations to have to bump the gain to +6 db just to get the normal iris. 0 db gain I would say would only be useful with stage lighting. Not sure if the UX 180 does any better or the new CX 350 panasonic released this year. Would love to hear your thoughts on this, UKAirscape. Thanks in advance!
@@UKAirscape ok great! - love your videos by the way... very informative and you seem to do a nice job cutting the rubbish out and getting right to the point! - thank you :) I'd like to show you the video I just did last week and get your thoughts on it using the UX90... is there an email address I can send the link to ?
CAN YOU TAKE STILL IMAGES (PICTURES) WHIE FILMING? ALSO, DO YOU THINK THIS CAMERA SMOKES THE PANASONIC HC-1000? I HEAR THAT CAMERA HAS CRAPPY LOW LIGHT ABILITY.
I don't think it takes stills but I stand to be corrected. Have not compared it with the HC1000 but that's an older model so the new one ought to be better.
I've not compared them directly but my guess would be the Sony however the physical format of the camcorders is very different so you might need to choose based on the size and ergonomics as much as the image.
One of the best TH-cam reviews I have ever watched!. Great job! Great audio, honest slow talk, pauses between sentences. Very enjoyable , don't change a thing what you do.
Thank you!
Thank you so much! I had paid money for the 90 but after this video I'll pay the store some more for the 180. I would have really felt terrible had I watched this video after purchasing the 90. Thank you for saving my life.
Amazingly thorough review. Really helpful. Also addressed my burning question which was should I spring for the next model and what would I get for the extra money. Thank you so much for taking the time to do this.
Thank you, glad it helped.
Excellent review. Thanks for taking the time to do this. I wasn't even aware of the HC-X1. Looks like I need to do some more research. Thanks again for taking the time to do such a thorough review. It was time well spent.
Great, thank you for that kind comment. It's much appreciated.
thanks for the awesome review and for bringing out the HCX1, i had no idea it existed! probably will be my next investment, thanks again!
Cheers. Yes the HCX1 looks terrific; I can't understand why Panasonic Consumer are selling it so much less than the Panasonic Pro UX180!
What an excellent review - many thanks! I was already theoretically "sold" on the HC-X1 but you've nicely confirmed my choice.
Thank you. Hope you enjoy the camcorder.
Simply need to say that I love your videoes to bits! You're awesome to listen to, thank you very much. I am so glad to have stumpled onto your channel. Keep up your fantastic work mate!
Thank you :-)
Great review how is it compare to the 1 inch sensor model Sony AX100. In low light.
I have not tried the AX100 so I can't sensibly comment however they are very distinctly different camcorders in price and in purpose so they're not really comparable as the likely applications would be different.
I had the ax100 and found skin tone looked pastey.
I REALLY REALLY love this review! Best review of this camera (as well as the HC X1, wich is pretty much the same but better). Thanks a lot for your time and your reviews, i learned and enjoyed a lot with them. Its now 2020 but i´m gonna buy a HC X1. By the way, the place wher you made this review... Love it! Nice and comfortable kitchen.
I LOVE this camera! Really crisp image quality.
Thank you. That has got to be the best camera review I seen. Very helpful.
Great review! I just returned a Canon G50 thru Amazon... I got what I paid for......
These Panasonics offer so much more and the price has come down since your initial review. Which would you chose between the Sony AX700 and the Panasonic HC X1??? Thanks again for your review!!
They're very different camcorders really. The Sony will have better image quality but the Panasonic has better manual controls plus XLR audio inputs
Very keen to see where the HC-X1e sits in this. It does appear to be much more than just an updated HC-X1000. I have pre ordered one so fingers crossed...
It's as described at the end of my review; essentially the same as the UX180 minus the HD-SDI output.
UKAirscape hopefully will match up with the gh4 too
Thank You! Great review and pretty much made me comfortable in buying this camera before actually physically playing with it. I have no use for 4K in tight spaces in my work for the foreseeable future so this will work out great. Thank you also for answering my confusion about the HC-X1. Unfortunately, as another viewer mentioned, it's currently $1100 more than the UX90 and only $300 less than the UX180 in the US. The view finder not being able to flip sideways will annoy me, but I do have an external 7" HDMI monitor if I really need to get away from behind it.
Maybe the UK offices got the price difference the wrong way round!
excellent review as always. Good thing you also mentioned the x1.
Thank you. I'm still staggered by the existence and pricing of the X1!
Thank you SO MUCH for mention the UX-180 AND the HC-X1 in this review.
As I am looking at them all and was confused about so many choices in the same price range.
oh, the HC-X1 look EXACTLY the same on the outside.
(except fo the 20x lens marking ...)
Wow - and IS part of the pro division, it appears.
and what da heck is this HC-X1000?
another choice?
argh!
oh, the HC-x1000 has a smaller imager ... for $2000.
It's an older model, not so good.
That was very very useful even nearly 2 years later. I enjoyed your review. You're very animated when you present. It's great!
Thank you!
Very nice review, gave me some information I had missed, and a lot of things to think about. I looked up the HC-X1, in the US is runs around $3200, while the UX180 is about $3500, which makes much more sense considering that you said the only real difference is the SDI output.
I'm beginning to wonder if someone's made an error at Panasonic UK! Maybe I should snap one up before they realise...
Thank you for your thoughtful.. calm.. well-spoken camera reviews.
Thank you
The HC-X1 comes with sensor next to the viewfinder that turns off the pullout screen when is senses the person wanting to look through the viewfinder. It had me thinking i had a bad unit as i was sitting in my truck. my shoulder kept tripping the sensor
and pullout screen kept shutting off. there is also a switch to turn off the sensor (nice)! I think Panasonic was listening. Cheers!
I hate it when they do that! Glad you could turn it off.
Recently ordered the UX-90....then watched your review......now changed my order to the UX180....many thanks, I think!
The UX180 is definitely a better camcorder albeit rather more expensive.
Very well done! I recently ran into the "4K mode unwanted zoom" feature with my new Canon 5D Mark IV. This was a surprise I was not happy about. Looks like I'll save my pennies for the HC-X1. It solves the unwanted crop and the fewer frame rate options issues. Thank you for the informative review!
I was toying with buying the HC-X1 again myself a couple of days ago; really is very well featured although of course very different to shooting with a 5D or any "DSLR"-type camera. Glad you liked the review.
Thank you so much!
I was pretty much set on the UX-90.
But you really convinced me to buy the HC-X1. You’re a lifesaver!
I hope you enjoy it! Cheers
Too many caveats IMO. Compared to the things you disliked on the Panasonic, your review of the HXR-NX100 was a perfect camcorder by comparison. BTW, I contacted B&H Photo in NYC and they have sold many of those to the point where it was constantly out of stock. In addition, the price on it has fallen to boot. Most people who bought it raved about it. The only occasional complaint was concerning the AF. Others still said the AF performed very well. I'm still saving for that one. I'll probably pull the trigger in early 2017 as I'll need enough money for all the accessories I'll require. Glad to see Panasonic loaned you one to test and review. You have a gift my friend. Well done!
Thank you! The UX90 is nice but definitely the HC-X1 or UX180 is the one to buy in most cases, I would suggest. And yes, the NX100 is a great little cam. Cheaper now, you say?!
When originally released in the U.S.A the NX100 was $1699. Now, it's a mere $1599.95 U.S. I'm in Canada and despite the exchange rate, I'd still pay more for it here as of today , as well as quite a bit more for accessories. Canadian stores cannot or will not compete with U.S superstores.
First of all, thank you for your wonderful videos. Very helpful. In your opinion, what is the best budget prosumer camcorder? For under $2000. Thanks
Probably the Sony AX700 at that budget
@@UKAirscape Thank you
I was dead set on the AG UX90 until I watched this video. Now the front runner is the HC X1 (thanks by the way). But you made the comment about the HDMI SD out not being available in the X1. I'm a bit of a newbie and and not clear what that means or how it "may" limit me. FYI, my main use for this camera is for documentaries: interviews, handheld cinema verite, run and gun, yada, yada, yada.... Thanks much!
You're confusing two things; HDMI out and SDI out are two different ways of getting video out of the camcorder. As I recall (and it was a while aho I made this so best to check what I'm saying) both camcorders have HDMI out but only the UX180 has SDI out. If you don't know what SDI out is, you almost certainly don't need it - it's a pro-format BNC connection typically used for connecting to other broadcast gear eg if you were to feed a live sat truck for example, or some external recorders (though they can usually take the HDMI feed as well)
Thanks, UKAirscape. Yeah, after I wrote the comment I realized I inadvertently stated HDMI. But you definitely cleared things up re: SDI, which was my primary question. So thanks a lot!!
Quick question, how does the UX180 compare to the DVX200, similar price (with the rebate) but much larger sensor. Also the HC-X1 is $3,200 in America, a full $1,100 more than the UX90.
Yes, various people have said that now; such an odd pricing difference over there. DVX is more doco/drama oriented I suppose, the UX more ENG/run-n-gun.
Very helpful review - thanks
Great!
seven hours of battery life is impressive indeed, thanks for another great review
Yes, I had to double check the manual but it definitely says it! (The UX180 gets only half that)
Thanks again good sir
Nice in-depth review.
Do you live on that boat?
Yes. If you're curious, see th-cam.com/users/CruisingTheCutUK
Great review! The low light shows very little noise even at 20db gain, much better than my GH4.. Does theAG-UX90 have a lanc input for a zoom control like a varizoom? Im not finding that info on B&H listing. thx
Hmm, a very good question but unfortunately I don't remember, sorry (I only had the unit on loan and it's long since been returned)
thx I just ordered from B&H and they tell it does have lanc control. thx
Great review. Thinking of PX'ing my HC-X1000 (which I love ) for the upcoming X1.Hope you will review. Particularly whether the DOF is shallower at full aperture on the X1 compared to the X1000. Hope you might be able to test this at some point. Thanks.
Unfortunately, I won't be getting an HC-X1 to test because Panasonic's consumer division never talk to me, unlike their pro division. I might be able to wangle a UX180 which is essentially the same though.
Thank you for this review.Informative and honest,as always.Every time when you post something I know it will be good Thanks for your time
Cheers Eugen, that's much appreciated.
Great review! Thank you, just clicked buy it now on the HC-X1.
Thank you :-)
what about a dead cat for the Tascam 22wl? its elasticated and should work?? Great review and still relevant in 2019.
Hi, oh! Nicely done - saved the best to last! And, I think I've got this right, the consumer version can output H264 in an MP4 container as well as as MOV (terrible memory these days). What I don't know is if that is particularly significant. Any comment welcome! Bob
That would only be relevant if editing on a Mac which traditionally prefers mov but I think these days it's largely agnostic in that respect.
Very worthwhile review. Interesting thoughts and possible cost savings with choice of model. Thanks
:-)
A most excellent review with the unfortunate side affect of me now wanting to spend more, but my money tree is bare. While I've filmed lectures for a few years now I'm new to the pro level cameras so have done a couple of months online research. It'll be a big purchase for me and will be an all rounder camera. Your video is the best review of any pro camera I've seen in all that research. It was good to hear the real faults and a comparison to other models. You actually mentioned other models. I've noticed it is very hard finding a footing to start learinging the various camera models available when you don't know what actually exists! So thanks for that. If I had the money I'd absolutely get the X1 or 180 after that.
I'll probably still get the UX90 but at least now I have a better realisation of the wide angle issue. That's the only real issue that will annoy me, and yet the 1080 it produces is still miles ahead of the small sensor cameras I've been using so I can't really complain.
Thanks again.
Hi Allan. Thank you, glad you liked the video. Have fun with the camcorder :-)
Thank you. This review is very usefull.
Glad it helped.
What is the difference between" panasonic hc x 1000" & "panasonic AG UX90"???
I can't sensibly list all the differences and similarities here, I suggest you look them up. Essentially the UX90 is a newer camcorder.
Excellent review. In auto mode does it have face detection like in the consumer models? Is there a built-in mic?
There is a built in mic - I talked about that in the review. No face detection as far as I could see.
Thanks for the heads-up on the cameras.
I have the HC-X 1000, terrible in low light.
I am hoping to sell my HC-X1000 and my X920 (superb HD camera) to get a used HC X1.
I do also use a Sony A6300, magnificent in low light 4k, but it's not a video camera so limited to 30 minute recording.
Oh, plus battery life poor and it overheats even in our cold UK.
I hope the HC X1 is as good as the Sony A6300.
I think that might be an optimistic hope in pure low light terms not least because you can put a faster lens on the Sony and (I think, from memory) it has a bigger sensor. Also, I've generally found Sony stuff to be very good in low light, with clever noise reduction when you add gain. But the X1 should be better than the older model I think.
wow, thank you kind sir for your educated reply.
I think I have been getting excited for nothing by the sound of it.
The HC-X1 is now retailing for about £2100 (on-line) they were £2600 ish, I was very disappointed with the low light performance of the X1000 and this was made worse by the release of the X1 within 6 months of me buying the X1000.
The Alpha 6300 is just magic in low light, i.e. weddings in medieval churches, wedding receptions, first dance etc but they A/ Overheat, B/ record for 30 minutes which is no good for a traditional English wedding and C/ the batteries last about 40 minutes.
Finally, may I ask what model Sony video camera I should maybe consider? is that maybe the 700 ? i forget the letters.
Incidentally, my trusty HC-X920 HD camera performed very well in low light.
Thank you very much indeed.
Sony don't have a great deal of stuff at a similar price point to the Panny as I recall. I've just bought an NX80 which is "decent" in dim light but probably still not a patch on a DSLR-type camera. It's also a little ergonomically challenged due to having only a single lens ring. Maybe the Z150 might be up your street? Bear in mind these camcorders won't give you that super shallow depth of field for "pretty" pictures like the A6300 will either.
Thank you again for your recommendations.
I actually found A Sony Z100 on ebay, no used Z150's at the mo.
I may just bite the bullet and like you say, the Panasonic HC-X1 has to be better than the X1000.
I lost out on this camera the other day, I'm pretty sure they were over £4000 new, didn't realise they are micro 4/3rds sensor
www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Panasonic-AG-DVX200-4K-Professional-Camcorder/253584463863?ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT&_trksid=p2060353.m1438.l2649
well the HC-x1 is finally available and I am all ready to get one. And it is all thanks to your guidance. I am curious if you have tried to mix footage from this with a G7 or GH4 panasonic? What did you think of matching them in post?
I am gonna sell all of my canon lenses and gear to get this and either g7 or gh4 to go with it. Thanks again!
+shawn wright Steady now, don't just take my word for it! Please do check its right for you. Just because I like it doesn't mean you will :-) Quite extreme to dump your prior gear. No, I have not tried matching it to the G7 or GH4 so I can't comment on matching them, sorry.
Excellent review, thank you!
Good review. Very informative. Will have to watch it again to absord it all. Hadn't appreciated the difference in 4K field of view between the different models (DVX200, X1, UX180 and UX90). I'm mainly after UHD at 60fps to load to TH-cam so I guess X1 or UX180 is best for me. I'm a sucker for bling though and my brand is red so would be difficult not to go for he 200 :>) Cheers Dom (Essential RC)
Yes, sounds like you need the X1 / UX180 for sure. Get some red stickers ;-)
Hi Sir, I want to know about Panasonic AG UX90 recording signal, can it work in PAL area? Format in 1920x1080 50i? Thanks a lot.
Yes, my review unit was PAL.
UKAirscape oh no option for NTSC? So its not worldwide camera unit?
I don't remember if it's switchable because I used mine only in PAL. I suggest you look at the user manual, available online.
This video got me interested in the UX cameras when you posted it, and at the end of 2019 I purchased an open box UX180 from a place that does service and repair work for B&H Photo - $1,950. It was perfect, not a mark on it. Its a sweet camera! It seemed to me that if Panasonic ever updates the DVX200 to make it a tad lighter and more well balanced (an other image related updates) then I would consider a NEW camcorder but not much else interests me right now. Between my GH5 and the 180 all my boxes are checked off for now.
Now that is one fantastic presentation. Kudos! good job!
Thank you
Great video, Have you done a review of Panasonic's AG UX180 there are lots more the camera can do over the ag-ux90 plus it's now less than £2000
As I recall, the UX180 is virtually identical to the HC-X1 which I think I referred to in this video.
great video. can you make how to use manual on this video camcorder please? nobody have showing with manual yet. thanks
I do not have this camcorder anymore, it was on loan for the review only, several years ago.
Great review. My church is looking at replacing an S-Video Camcorder with the UX90. Using HDMI Extenders over Cat6 or Cat7. Your thoughts?
Not sure what you want my thoughts on exactly, sorry. It'd be a huge step up from an S-video camcorder. I've never used HDMI extenders, can't comment on those.
have the panasonic ag cx350 now very nice piece of kit
Thank you very much, I really liked your pxw-x70, and now this one is also great, very practical. Do you have any plans for reviewing ux180 as well, any soon? I understand that its shipping will start in Dec.
By the way, except that missing port, is there any technical differences between HC-X1 and UX180 you are aware of? (I have heard something about the processor differences from a friend but I doubt it, I checked specs for both I did not find anything except : "4K High-Speed Processing LSI" equally for both. Thank you in advance :)
The port is the only difference that I know of. If I find there's some sneaky hidden difference that upsets things I'll be really annoyed!
Probably not, only because it's so similar to this one apart from the extra features as discussed in this review.
Thank you again , for your reply and great reviews.
You talked about with the 90 switching it to 4k you lose some of some of you lens from 24 to 35mm. Does that happen in the 180 too?
No (or maybe about 1mm difference I think)
I don't think so. It's my understanding that that is the main difference between the two. But you can get the HC X1, which doesn't crop in 4k for only a few hundred dollars more. It doesn't have an HD SDI out (whatever that means), but everything else - on the camera at least - seems to be the same.
He addresses my main issue with upgrading. when I was in my 30's I used the hvx200a and loved it but now I am in my 50's have shaky hands now and I hate the ax53 not because it is bad but because the BOOS stabilization is magical and has spoiled me. I cannot overstate how great it is. My shoots do not allow time to fool with external gimbals but I can afford this camera and I would love to have more control over the exposure which the ax53 lacks but I cannot give up the BOSS stabilization. It is a lot easier to adjust exposure in post if I need to which is rare then fix shaky camera shots. I shoot audio on a recorder off camera so the lack of audio features on the ax53 is not an issue. I hope Sony puts "BOSS" in a more pro camera like this one soon.
Hey Mr. Johns. I'd just like to wish you a Merry Christmas to you and your family and a Happy New Year. Keep up the good work.
Thank you. Happy Christmas to you too!
Excellent review. I would like to know if any of these camcorders supports V-log recording.
Greetings from Bogotá, Colombia.
I would have like to see you compare this to the DVX 200 or the HPX 270.
I don't have either of those cameras so could not so such a comparison, sorry.
me too!
Best review ever
Thank you!
Excellent , kindly may you do review for Panasonic AG-HPX 250
Unfortunately I do not have access to that camcorder
Hello Sir, i don't really understand why you only have such small number of subscribers. while are crappy review channels have thousands or even millions. it's somewhat weird!! That's by far the most detailed and unbiased review of a digital product i've ever seen on youtube. really!! without those fancy useless intros and effects.
you should definitely do more reviews and request more products to review from brands. i easily see you as a top youtube reviewer if you dedicate yourself to that specific niche. anyway, your input on this was much appreciated!
i was planning to buy this camcorder, but your point about cropped 4k just saved me from purchasing an item that will not suit my needs. i'm looking for a good IQ and low light performance 1inch sensor compact camcorder.
Until now, i didn't find one that checks all these boxes altogether. was looking into the Sony ax700/nx80 but seen on another review that it's not that good in low light, plus it doesn't do 4K 60p. so i'm still searching for something that can do the job and be future proof. will check the Panasonic HC X1 that you mentioned in the end and see if i can deal with it given it's bulky design.
Meanwhile, if you have any suggestion about a newer compact model, from any brand, that delivers good performance in all aspects while still keeping a compact size, please advise accordingly.
Thank you sir for your valuable time, you just got a new subscriber and looking forward to other reviews from you!
Keep it up, you're the best! Respect from Morocco!
Thank you. The NX80 does reasonably well in low light, I think, compared to similar cameras of similar price etc but you're right it does not do 50/60p.
The HC-X1 does not do well in low light (much like the UX90), like a lot of Panasonic's entry-level pro camcorders.
An entry-level but fully-featured and good quality camcorder is impossible to find!
تقصد UX90 جيدة في إضاءة منخفضة
First of all
thank you very much for your contributions, I would like to ask you if
the hc-x1 will not be an update of the x1000, and if it behaves well in
low light, that in x1000 was highly criticized, and also thank you for
your opinion 4.2.0 to 8 bits, and its comparison to the sony z-150. Thanks for your kindness.
The HC-X1 is as described in the video; it appears to be a consumer-branded version of the AG-UX180. What relation it has to the X1000 I cannot say. The low light would presumably be as shown in this video since I believe all three use the same sensor, though the X1 / UX180 do use a different lens so I can't be certain of the low light ability.
I don't know what you mean about my opinion on "4:2:0 to 8 bits". I cannot compare with the Z150 as I have not used it.
Well I meant the depth of color, for example the sony x7o is 422 10 bits.
Yes, I know what it means but I wasn't sure what your question about it is. What actually do you want to know? Sorry, I'm confused.
What I ask is if with that codec it is viable for color correction in postproduction ...
Ah. I suppose that depends on how critical you are. 10 bit 4:2:2 will inevitably hold up better but it doesn't mean you can't tweak something that's 8/4:2:0 a bit.
Great video, very informative even almost 4 years later. But exactly because of these 4 years, I would like to ask if the X1 is still, in your opinion, a good buy for those who want to cover events and fairs. Is there a better alternative for a similar price? I work with GH5 and GH4 in small web commercials. But I miss a typical run and gun camcorder, with good audio, practicality and quality. I would appreciate hearing your opinion. Thank you!
Of the two camcorders, the HC-X1 was and remains the better. In terms of more modern camcorders, there's been very little development recently, they seem to be out of fashion, so the UX90 and X1 are still Panasonic's offerings at that sort of price range. I like them in many ways but they're not good in dim light, bit grainy.
wow...you open my eyes...thanks
I currently own the DVX200 4K - this looks pretty similar in its design. Is there much difference between this and the DVX200 4K?
I've used the DVX200 but only for an hour or so and it was at least a year ago so with apologies I can't give a sensible and fair comparison.
Thank you from south-France for this review, but is the ag-ux90 better in low lights than hc x1. My job is video recording of musicians, actors with sometimes very bad lightning.
Please, excuse-me for my english
Thanks
Unfortunately I have not tested the HC-X1 so I cannot give you the comparison. Sorry. I don't think either camcorder is particularly good in low light though.
Thank you very much!
Ux90 is bad in low light. In your experience which parameters are BEST to film in low light? Flou (F2) or cine V (F5)? I usually rec in shutter 25, cine V ,12gain but the imagen dont have definition.
Great great review video. Thanks for making this.
Cheers
Excellent review, and your explanations were really helpful to a chap like me, who makes films for amateur creativity only. I was looking at the UX180 to replace my old Sony Z5, but with HC-X1 running at about £900 less, I would like to ask what the lack of SDI output and Timecode functions will mean to someone like me, who rarely films something with another cam at the same time.
Kind regards, Billy
It will mean pretty much nothing! If you're not syncing to another cam or trying to record HD via SDI to another device then it's irrelevant.
Hi! Great review. Can you help me ? I'm choosing my new camcorder. I need to make advertising/commercials spot-TV, and industrial videos. I'll use it primarily in HD, but i prefer buying a 4k model to not miss any (few) opportunities (in 4k/UHD).
Which camcorder would you recommend between Panasonic AG-UX 90 and JVC HM200E ? Thanks and ciao from Italy!
The Panasonic, for sure. The JVC has too many limitations and issues (see my reviews on both)
Hang on; you do realise that 30p should not automatically be considered better than 25p don't you? They're different frame rates to suit the different TV standards around the world. 25 is the PAL (European - including Italy!) standard whereas 300 is for NTSC countries like the USA.
So if you're going to shoot for TV, you can forget 30; you need to shoot 25/50. Only if you exclusively and totally shoot for computers / the Internet would you get away with filming 30p in a European country. Any DVDs, Blu-rays or TV work will expect 25. In fact, they'll probably still want 50i (25 interlaced frames). Yes, you could shoot 30 and downsample the frame rate but this looks terrible and jerky (because 29.97 fps - which is what 30fps actually is - does not divide neatly into 25 fps!)
The JVC has poor focus (both at small and wide apertures, if I recall correctly) and the lens wasn't parfocal. It was troublesome to get crisp focus and that's a serious issue. The iris ramps downn significantly when zooming, which was irritating also.
The JVC's slightly wider angle (29.5 vs 34.5) is still not what I'd call wide angle (compared to the UX180's 25mm for example) and if it were my money, I'd put a wide angle lens adapter on the UX90 rather than buy the JVC.
Well, you answered all my questions. Your explanation is very precise and exhaustive. I have no more doubts to choose Panasonic. Thank you for your time, bye!
What would you recommend for a 4k shooting an entire lacrosse field? Camera would be fixed and no zooming or panning. Thank you
Do you mean, what camera would I recommend? Or a lens adapter for this one? Or...? (Sorry, just a little confused what you're looking for)
a video camera with built in lens or one with attachable lenses. Just need it to cover end to end in single frame. Thanks!
Pretty much any camcorder can do it, albeit that if you're shooting from the side of the pitch you're going to end up with a lot of "wasted space" below and above (because the pitch will be a lot wider than the height of the action). You'd simply need to move the camera back until the entire pitch comes into view. Clearly the wider-angle lens the camcorder has, the easier (less far back) this becomes.
So it depends what budget you have and how able you are to move the camera to a suitable location. Being higher up and looking down will give you a fuller image since more of the height would be used (a bit like the shots from the end of a tennis court give you more action that a pure side-on shot would)
Hello: nice review. I heard from another review about problems with the option of using two sd-cards in one time (both cards should record simultaneously, as backup) - the man said, the camera froze. For work I prefer the other method when one starts recording when the other one is full... What is your experience with using two cards in any case - any problems? Thanks.
Hello. Unfortunately I didn't test that as I only had the camcorder on loan for review and took it at face value that it should work. I would presume that if there was a fault in this function then Panasonic would have to come up with a firmware update pretty soonish to address it, as it would be a substantial failing.
Hi again! I need a new camcorder for work - I got an AG-DVX100BE (tapes! 9 years old) - Full HD should be sufficient for youtube videos. I can´t decide between AG-UX90 and HC-X1 - what do you think? Thanks for helping!
The HC-X1 is far more highly specified and if I had the money to choose either it would be the one to go for. Not to be confused with the older HC-X1000 model mind you...
chiedo se quella che hai presentato è la UX 90 ? sono molto indeciso quale camcorder comprare , mi puoi dire se è un ottimo acquisto la AG UX90 oppure mi consigli un altro prodotto ...ciao e grazie
This is the UX90.
molte grazie
But wait.... doing more research it seems the 180 has more slow mo speeds than the x1 - correct? There are more differences than just DV out right?
I appreciate your help.
I genuinely don't know. I was under the impression the SDI/timecode was the only difference.
+shawn wright I've just checked and the X1 does do 100/120fps HD slowmo, same as the UX180
UKAirscape okay that is good to know. I wish there was a Panasonic dealer near me where I could try this out and ask detailed questions. Do you happen to have a contact at Panasonic who in turn has a contact here in the USA?
I have a contact at Panasonic's press office but I doubt they'll respond to public queries. You've tried Panasonic.com I presume?
Love you dude you answered all my questions.
Terrific! Glad to have helped.
Hello, I correctly understood that the difference between HC-X1 and AG-UX 180 only SDI ? Thank you
A small Deadcat/Windjammer for an audio recorder such as a TASCAM DR-05 would fit the internal mic on the X1.
Good idea, cheers
Hi iam use agux904k plese help to manual seting
Hi, first time viewer and soon to be first time camcorder owner. I will be using my camcorder exclusively for wildlife filming, I was wondering if the addition of focal length when switching to 4K on the UX90 extends throughout the range? My poor grasp of mathematics seems to suggest that if it does the effective maximum zoom would extend beyond that of the UX180/HC-X1.
BTW, absolutely first class video. Clear, concise and above all useful information. Thank you.
Yes, it's a 15x zoom regardless of where you start, so in UHD mode it's 35.4 mm to 531.0 mm (in 35mm equivalence terms, which is how these things are stated).
The HC-X1 / UX180 has a 20x zoom but starts from 25 .4, so goes 25.4 ― 508.0 mm. It is, as you say, ever so slightly less on the telephoto end.
Thanks for the kind words about the video!
UKAirscape as a 35mm wildlife dslr shooter, I know every extra mm is worth its weight. Thank you for the information.
Cheers
the best and honest review ever. thank you
Can we record with AG-UX90E the footage in 1st card in 4K quality and in 2nd card HD quality at same time?
No; that function is only on the UX180 / HC-X1
thank you very much!
That was lens flare? Thanks for clearing that up. I thought it was Wicked armpit odor
Hi, I'm writing from Spain, thanks for your tutorials, I have a big doubt that is driving me crazy and I'm worried, I've always recorded video with DSLR Canon 5d and 7d, and I have doubts between two models to make movies, prx-x70 or Panasonic ag-ux90, and I would like to know your impressions about which to choose since I want a look or film aesthetics. By theme of codecs and other characteristics, or perhaps another model or brand of price similar or even cheaper. thank you very much
If you want a film look, I'd stick with DSLRs or similar type cameras rather than camcorders.
But for the
comfort of sound inputs and focus had idea of video camera instead of
dslr, but I do not know what model you advise me with a cinema look.
Thanks for your answer.
What's your budget?
My budget is about $ 2500.
OK. Well, most camcorders around that price range don't have a "cinema" look because that's not what they're designed for. Unless you're talking big-budget units like Sony's F55, camcorders tend to be more TV-oriented. So you have a bit of a problem.
That said, if the camcorder shoots a nice image, you can always colour grade and crop the image and make it look cinematic in the edit. After all, what does "cinematic" really mean anyway... there have been cinema films shot on DV camcorders!
At your budget I'm going to suggest an oddball idea; the Canon XC-15. This is an update of the XC10 which a lot of people thought was terrible (though a lot of people who bought it seemed happy enough). I'm suggesting it because it shoots very high bitrate 4K at 24p, has an XLR audio interface and has film "looks" from the Canon C300 built-in.
Specwise, it shoots 4K video to CFast cards in an MXF wrapper at up to 305 Mbps in an H.264-based, IntraFrame, 4:2:2, 8-bit codec; while 1080p video writes to SD cards at up to 50 Mbps in an H.264-based, Long-GOP, 4:2:2, 8-bit codec.
Bear in mind those CFast cards are quite costly. Also, a massive disclaimer: I have never used or even seen this camera. But it is an interesting hybrid between a DSLR-style (albeit with a fixed lens) and a camcorder functionality.
Take a look at the spec (and reviews) on www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1278108-REG/canon_1456c002_xc15_4k_professional_camcorder.html
Thanks for the video! One question, Panasonic AG-UX180 or HC-X1 for professional use. Why is AG-UX180 more expensive than Hc-X1? Is it so different?
Not very much; as I recall it has HD-SDI outputs on it and timecode but that's about it (from memory). They're otherwise almost identical.
180 have WFM. 90 - histogram
We often think that cameras like this are an all-in-one solution. Unfortunately that is rarely the case. You are likely to need a monitor. I have been using this type of camera for many years. I always use a recorder/monitor partially I shoot long events. Staring at the 3.5 screen all day really sucks.
Agreed, a monitor can really help. Not always feasible when run-n-gun shooting though, alas :-(
You always need a monitor on any camera..
Informative video but I am struggling with maintaining focus. I'm looking for help. Is there a way to set the UX90 to track a subject and keep it in focus? I have seen advertising videos boasting that the UX series (90 and 180) do this but I can FIND NO INSTRUCTION on how to set it. I do a lot of off center interviews and a very bothered by the focus shifting to the background, I'm finding 'manual everything' is the only way to control this. I hate shifting focus, exposure and color. Is there anyway around this with tracking or focus lock?
It's a long time since I had this camcorder on loan for review so I can't help with whether it has auto tracking but I think honestly if you're doing interviews where you and the subject remain static then you're much better off using manual focus and setting it correctly by yourself anyway. Ditto exposure and white balance.
Auto is really best suited to "run and gun" situations where you literally wouldn't have time to set them youself while simultaneously chasing the shot.
interesting review. Now more confused as to what to do now:-) looking for a 2nd camera. Current one is an AC90. Tempted just to find another one of those (cheap) rather than the UX90 and make the UX90 the main camera. I do corporate, interviews documentary etc.
If you're happy with the AC90 and can find a good one, cheap, as long as they do what you need, stick with it. No need to spend money when you don't have to :-)
well that advice has just saved me £1000 :-) Talking to the Panasonic Guru in another place the problem I would have with a mix of AC90 &UX90 is colour matching (due to completely different sensor technologies). with 2* AC90 I should be able to cut between the two with minim fuss. Also it means I only have to memories & lear 1 set of camera controls and not two similar but different ones.
There's a lot to be said for sticking with what you know. Cheers
@@UKAirscape three years on and I need a third camera ( I have 2 AC90's) With the AG-UX180 now down to £2395 (exVat) is your advice still to go to the HC-1X (at about £1700 ex-Vat)
It seems to me that unless you specifically need the UX180's features (which I now cannot remember as it's been so long) then the HC-X1 did pretty much everything the UX180 did as I recall so of the two, that would be a better buy.
Thanks you really helped me with my purchasing decision. Thank you
I am thinking compare this UX camcorder to FZ2500 , same lens for 2 products , but any 4k crop problem in FZ2500 ??
is it very close spec between the UX90 to FZ2500 ? If I don't need some ENG feature like 3 rings stuff, may I go to FZ2500 ?
I haven't tried the FZ so cannot sensibly comment but if you don't need the ENG style then certainly your options are expanded.
Very good review, very clear. Thank you!
:-)
Hello.What about recording codec?? all this models record only 4.2.0 ??
Yes, 4:2:0 as I recall. Can't remember the exact spec of codec offhand but some flavour of h.264 as they all tend to do these days.
Thanks.
Is there any Fine-adjustment for the shutter speed to reduce flickering and horizontal stripes? Can you fine adjust frequency ?
I can't remember, sorry (the camcorder was only on loan to me and that was several months ago). Best to check the manual or specs online.
ok, thanks
Thanks for the interesting and clear presentation!
Thank you, glad you liked it.
Thank you for this perfect review !
Glad you liked it.
Very informative, thank you.
bonjour how is low light in 4K and in HD for low light concert?
It depends how low you mean and what your expectations are. I thought I discussed low light ability during the review and gave examples. If I didn't, see my other review at th-cam.com/video/CKm6TSV-isU/w-d-xo.html
How is the auto focus? would this be a good camcorder to record lectures, sometimes with in low light situations., would auto focus find the speaker and stay on the speakers face? And how is the low light performance, if the lighting is not the best or if the speaker is back lit, or if lighting is bad?
Already answered over on Tubeshooter so won't repeat myself here! ;-)
can anyone tell me which one is better in low light panasonic ux90 or sony nx100 please?
I'd say the Sony. The Panasonic did not have good low light, the Sony dealt with high gain remarkably well for its price.
@@UKAirscape I've had a chance to experiment with this camera in the last week. I agree with you re: low light situation ... I've found just shooting in regular room situations to have to bump the gain to +6 db just to get the normal iris. 0 db gain I would say would only be useful with stage lighting. Not sure if the UX 180 does any better or the new CX 350 panasonic released this year. Would love to hear your thoughts on this, UKAirscape. Thanks in advance!
I'd love to get the new one in to try - perhaps I'll drop Panasonic a note and see if they're keen!
@@UKAirscape ok great! - love your videos by the way... very informative and you seem to do a nice job cutting the rubbish out and getting right to the point! - thank you :) I'd like to show you the video I just did last week and get your thoughts on it using the UX90... is there an email address I can send the link to ?
UX90 Panasonic vs NX200 Sony Which is best sir please make video. Compare. Thanks
CAN YOU TAKE STILL IMAGES (PICTURES) WHIE FILMING? ALSO, DO YOU THINK THIS CAMERA SMOKES THE PANASONIC HC-1000? I HEAR THAT CAMERA HAS CRAPPY LOW LIGHT ABILITY.
I don't think it takes stills but I stand to be corrected. Have not compared it with the HC1000 but that's an older model so the new one ought to be better.
Is this camera suitable for live streaming sporting events, whether they are inside or out?
Hello, nice video, can you tell me please between panasonic ux90 and sony ax700 that offers a clearer, better video in full hd format ?
I've not compared them directly but my guess would be the Sony however the physical format of the camcorders is very different so you might need to choose based on the size and ergonomics as much as the image.