Keep up te good work Sarah! Please make some videos on how to write answers to the problem questions and essay questions in the examination. That would be really helpful.
Where does Mens Rea fit in with omission crimes? In the case of R v Pitwood, he didn't intend to keep the gate open but merely forgot. Would it fall under negligence?
Yes, Pittwood was liable for gross negligence manslaughter in that case. Although not aware of a specific authority which precludes it it'd be difficult to find a situation where mens rea for an omission would be more than recklessness
@@phoonjzc Direct intent, oblique intent and recklessness are the levels of mens rea for most criminal offences. There are a few exceptions such as gross negligence manslaughter which have a different requirement Direct and oblique intent are more than recklessness
The video says generation of any consequence or result is not necessary, the fact that a person did that act in the first place is sufficient. But the first slide under result crimes says something completely different. plz explain
Yes, generation of any consequence or result is not necessary for action crimes, thing like lying under oath is an action crime. A result crime is different, it requires a specific result to occur. Murder is an action crime because it requires a death. Hope that clears up the confusion, if not, please let me know and I'm very happy to help further.
My videos are all based on the English and Welsh system . There are some differences with Scottish law so you'd need to consult a good quality textbook on the subject to be sure.
A magistrate is a volunteer who sits (usually) in the Magistrates court in a panel of 3 to decide primarily on less serious criminal trials and be the first hearing court for all criminal offences. They do have a small civil jurisdiction. They have to sit for 26 half days each year as a minimum and they will be assigned to their local court.
Keep up te good work Sarah! Please make some videos on how to write answers to the problem questions and essay questions in the examination. That would be really helpful.
I do not know how I can thank you enough. Please keep doing this kind of videos.
Anyone planning on watching HTGAWM should watch this video! You definitely explained the basic very well!! Thank you!!
Thank you so much Sarah! This is very helpful to me as a beginner for law studying. It is simply and clearly video course.
Im in the same boat that u was in 3 years ago! this video is great!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I love your teaching ❤
Big Thanks Sara!! You explain very nicely. Stay blessed 🙂
I must say very informative video :D
Why do you only have 1.7k subscribers? This is awesome!
Thanks a lot, hugely informative and easy to understand :)
Where does Mens Rea fit in with omission crimes? In the case of R v Pitwood, he didn't intend to keep the gate open but merely forgot. Would it fall under negligence?
Yes, Pittwood was liable for gross negligence manslaughter in that case.
Although not aware of a specific authority which precludes it it'd be difficult to find a situation where mens rea for an omission would be more than recklessness
@@SarahHarwood what do you mean by specific authority that precludes it?
@@phoonjzc A specific act that stops this
@@SarahHarwood there is only direct, indirect and recklessness. What do you mean by more than recklessness
@@phoonjzc Direct intent, oblique intent and recklessness are the levels of mens rea for most criminal offences. There are a few exceptions such as gross negligence manslaughter which have a different requirement
Direct and oblique intent are more than recklessness
Thank you, Sarah❤❤❤
Hello. Thank you very much for a wonderful video tutorial. Can you please help me with the notes?
Great 👍
4:13 voluntary act to commit a crime; not involuntary ---- a positive act; actually doing something
Thank you.. This is clear for me
Thank you so much ❤
thanks..this is very helpful
Thank you for this
very effective cls
from bangladesh
usually i dont like english accents but i liked yours sarah
I like the video
The video says generation of any consequence or result is not necessary, the fact that a person did that act in the first place is sufficient. But the first slide under result crimes says something completely different. plz explain
Yes, generation of any consequence or result is not necessary for action crimes, thing like lying under oath is an action crime. A result crime is different, it requires a specific result to occur. Murder is an action crime because it requires a death. Hope that clears up the confusion, if not, please let me know and I'm very happy to help further.
Thank you so much. That was a great help Sarah :)
Thank you
Is this based on Scots Law as well?
My videos are all based on the English and Welsh system . There are some differences with Scottish law so you'd need to consult a good quality textbook on the subject to be sure.
What is a magistrate?
A magistrate is a volunteer who sits (usually) in the Magistrates court in a panel of 3 to decide primarily on less serious criminal trials and be the first hearing court for all criminal offences. They do have a small civil jurisdiction. They have to sit for 26 half days each year as a minimum and they will be assigned to their local court.
@@SarahHarwood so a magistrate can take away my constitutional rights.
@@latejanaurbana1589 he might take your constitution but he will never take your constipational rights
how can i cite this in MLA?
My advice would be don't - Go back and find the info in a textbook of an appropriate level. Glanville Williams is your best bet
3:00 the victim is important; the country has your back