#CourtTV What do YOU think? Catch up on the case against #NancyGerwatowski here: www.courttv.com/news/mother-charged-with-murder-of-baby-garnet-wants-confession-thrown-out/?
Hoping baby Garnet gets justice. It’s great to see new technologies solving old cases and bringing to justice the people that thought they got away with it.
Would be her aunt/uncle. She looks just like her grandma. Younger version n wearing make up is all. Wonder how much her own mother looks like the grandma.
The granddaughter appeared rather callous, despite introducing the mysteriousness surrounding her mother and grandmother's relationship.... Although a toilet Pitt isn't by any means an ideal final resting place, it is a wonder to what extent the defendant could've had intentions of leading investigators to firstly be looking for a male perpetrator.... Sounds like Nancy was plainly cooperative once lawfully approached though, however.
Okay so I don’t know so I’m asking: if they said the baby could have been saved with medical intervention-can someone explain how someone would know that?
@shazzaSheehan1965 yes. My son was born with his cord around his neck, and the entire labour team jumped into action. He's a fine young man of 24 now.
Everyone is talking about how she murdered her baby. She went into labor unexpectedly in the bathtub, the baby got stuck in her canal, she tried to get the baby out, and she passed out. SHE ENDED UP UNCONSCIOUS WHILE TRYING TO GET THE BABY OUT. How is that murder??? 🤔 she had zero access to a telephone or cellphone. At the most concealing a de ath and body i can understand, but murder????
@@Gonzalez0110 it's murder because she didn't try to help the baby by calling for help. she instead drove miles and miles to dump the body in an outhouse toilet. you're required to report when your baby passes if the baby was born alive lol
I think some places in the world have a law that states that you must call an ambulance. But in America that could cost you your house and ruin you financially.
That's not what happened. In the video, they stated the baby could have been saved with medical intervention. She decided to leave the baby to die, and then drove out of her way to dump the baby's body like trash.
So the grandmother birthed the baby,she killed the baby, because she didn’t want her daughter to keep the baby? She got rid of the baby. So did she tell the mother the baby died?I have so many questions!
@@Hey_its_just_me_to that would make sense because the mother hasn't spoken to the Grandmother for years, maybe this is the reason why; because she killed her baby
@Hey_its_just_me_to no. She unexpectedly gave birth in the bathtub, and the baby got stuck in her birth canal. She tried to pull the baby out of her, but she ended up passing out. When she came to, she eventually got the baby out, but she had already passed away. She didn't have access to a phone or cell phone at the time so she couldn't call for help. I honestly believe they are charging her too harshly. I think canceling a de ath /body is an understandable charge, but the others I think a crazy.
@ oh ok, so she did not unalive the baby, if that’s the case yes the charges are a little too harsh, but they should’ve involved authorities and then she wouldn’t be in this mess!
@Hey_its_just_me_to 100% I agree with that! She should have went to the hospital or police for help! I know people panic and make stupid decisions in the moment, but i feel like it could have changed everything. That's why I get the charge for canceling, but the others seem too harsh.
I don’t know what they are going to come up with. However, if they try something like the cord was wrapped around her neck, it still doesn’t matter because she didn’t even attempt to get help and that poor baby was in a toilet pit/ outhouse/ porta toilet!! I could see the defense saying this to justify what she did. That is not justifiable.
She didn't have a phone to call 911? Ok even if that was true she went to great lenths to dispose of the baby after the fact she could have put as much effort into getting medical help for her baby. If she didn't do anything wrong then why try to hide the baby? Unless you are trying to hide evidence of a crime she knew that baby didn't die of natural causes and thats why she got rid of her to hide her crime. These women need to stop having sex if they can't handle the responsibility of what can come of it
These adults need to use CONTRACEPTIVES when they have sex to prevent pregnancy and unwanted births. Fixed it for you. Never heard of CONTRACEPTIVES? Go look it up.
Thank goodness for science, putting a name to baby. I was alarmed when granddaughter answered detective 'cool' 😳 when he mentioned her DNA was involved in solving a murder
I bet when this technique came out and all these cases started getting solved, this woman started 💩ing herself. I’m sure there’s a LOT of people 💩ing themselves. Scared that they’ll get busted.
When a pregnant woman is murdered, it’s classified as a double homicide. Yet, when a pregnant woman enters a Planned Parenthood clinic and a doctor ends the life of her healthy unborn child-dismembering the baby limb by limb, crushing the skull, and vacuuming out the remains-it is legally called “a choice,” with no charges brought against either the mother or the doctor. This stark contrast highlights the insane inconsistency in our laws regarding the value of life before and shortly after birth. It also reflects a broader cultural acceptance of legalized killing under the guise of abortion which is nothing more than a cult of death. Consider this scenario: if this mother had undergone a late-term abortion, no charges would have been filed. However, if she had given birth and the newborn died just minutes or hours later, it would be labeled a homicide. This disparity becomes even more alarming when states, like Virginia in recent years, have proposed laws permitting so-called "post-birth abortions." At this time, the full details of this case, including the mental state of the mother, remain unclear. If she is to face charges for murder, then it begs the question-why are we not also holding accountable the women and doctors who deliberately take the lives of healthy unborn children through abortion? This mother has undoubtedly endured unimaginable torment, and my prayers go out to her soul and for the judge(s) presiding over this case to rule with both compassion and justice.
@@jp4180 abortion is a medical procedure its not murder- don't spread misinformation please. We don't want what's happening in your stupid country america to happen in our country too🤡
@@nathaliemorales3501 In the United States, the legal treatment of the killing of a pregnant woman varies by state, particularly concerning whether the fetus is recognized as a separate victim. As of January 2024, 39 states have enacted "fetal homicide" laws that recognize the unlawful killing of an unborn child as homicide in at least some circumstances.
It depends on the state. Some states do not have fetal homicide laws. If not then a fetus is not considered a victim unless they are born. I assume that medical examiners can tell if a newborn was actually birth alive or died in uterus thus a stillborn. Medical examiners said the infant was born alive, so it was a victim. Also she was 35 not some 16 yr old.
Your comment is insane. If it wasn’t for women like you shaming women for having abortions she may have had one. Let’s say she has an abortion at 12 weeks. Fetus wouldn’t have suffered. This lady wouldn’t be a murder and the fully grown baby, who can now feel pain, wouldn’t have suffered. People who believe in pro choice don’t want women to get abortions as much as you don’t. However when you force a woman to have a baby even more suffering happens. The world is imperfect and we have imperfect solutions. But your takeaway of this case that abortions are wrong shows your lack of critical thinking and or how small of a town you come From and lack of struggle.
#CourtTV What do YOU think? Catch up on the case against #NancyGerwatowski here: www.courttv.com/news/mother-charged-with-murder-of-baby-garnet-wants-confession-thrown-out/?
Hoping baby Garnet gets justice. It’s great to see new technologies solving old cases and bringing to justice the people that thought they got away with it.
😉👏🎯⚖️
💯
This chick doing her makeup while talking about HER grandmother who killed an infant is wild.
Would be her aunt/uncle. She looks just like her grandma. Younger version n wearing make up is all. Wonder how much her own mother looks like the grandma.
so? it’s not like she murdered the baby don’t be so triggered 😂
The granddaughter appeared rather callous, despite introducing the mysteriousness surrounding her mother and grandmother's relationship.... Although a toilet Pitt isn't by any means an ideal final resting place, it is a wonder to what extent the defendant could've had intentions of leading investigators to firstly be looking for a male perpetrator.... Sounds like Nancy was plainly cooperative once lawfully approached though, however.
@@RyanJansen-mf7wu well said. Whether it’s her grandmother or not, she’s so non chalant about talking about a deceased baby.
Typical Gen Z
She definitely thought she got away with it. May justice now be swift and harsh
Why harsh?
Because she was more than harsh to the baby
😉👏🎯⚖️
@@margaretlumley1648 She got to live her life after murdering an innocent baby. But you’re questioning “why harsh” you’re it serious.
Okay so I don’t know so I’m asking: if they said the baby could have been saved with medical intervention-can someone explain how someone would know that?
Medical intervention at what point if it was a homicide. Who suffocates their newborn baby and calls 911 for help
If the cord was round the neck, they could have cut the cord and done CRP?
@shazzaSheehan1965 yes. My son was born with his cord around his neck, and the entire labour team jumped into action. He's a fine young man of 24 now.
They can't possibly know that
Everyone is talking about how she murdered her baby. She went into labor unexpectedly in the bathtub, the baby got stuck in her canal, she tried to get the baby out, and she passed out. SHE ENDED UP UNCONSCIOUS WHILE TRYING TO GET THE BABY OUT. How is that murder??? 🤔 she had zero access to a telephone or cellphone. At the most concealing a de ath and body i can understand, but murder????
@@Gonzalez0110 it's murder because she didn't try to help the baby by calling for help. she instead drove miles and miles to dump the body in an outhouse toilet. you're required to report when your baby passes if the baby was born alive lol
I think some places in the world have a law that states that you must call an ambulance. But in America that could cost you your house and ruin you financially.
That's not what happened. In the video, they stated the baby could have been saved with medical intervention. She decided to leave the baby to die, and then drove out of her way to dump the baby's body like trash.
@Bookish_Lattes it is, I read a few articles and they all said the same
I was waiting for this
So the grandmother birthed the baby,she killed the baby, because she didn’t want her daughter to keep the baby? She got rid of the baby. So did she tell the mother the baby died?I have so many questions!
No, Nancy gave birth to the child, not her daughter.
@@Hey_its_just_me_to that would make sense because the mother hasn't spoken to the Grandmother for years, maybe this is the reason why; because she killed her baby
@Hey_its_just_me_to no. She unexpectedly gave birth in the bathtub, and the baby got stuck in her birth canal. She tried to pull the baby out of her, but she ended up passing out. When she came to, she eventually got the baby out, but she had already passed away. She didn't have access to a phone or cell phone at the time so she couldn't call for help. I honestly believe they are charging her too harshly. I think canceling a de ath /body is an understandable charge, but the others I think a crazy.
@ oh ok, so she did not unalive the baby, if that’s the case yes the charges are a little too harsh, but they should’ve involved authorities and then she wouldn’t be in this mess!
@Hey_its_just_me_to 100% I agree with that! She should have went to the hospital or police for help! I know people panic and make stupid decisions in the moment, but i feel like it could have changed everything. That's why I get the charge for canceling, but the others seem too harsh.
I don’t know what they are going to come up with. However, if they try something like the cord was wrapped around her neck, it still doesn’t matter because she didn’t even attempt to get help and that poor baby was in a toilet pit/ outhouse/ porta toilet!! I could see the defense saying this to justify what she did. That is not justifiable.
Yeah and abortion is wrong too
Open murder charge means that the state doesn't know how the murder took place
I think suppression of any evidence is pure BS
Yes the baby was the grandmothers .the baby was born alive but suffocated. I guess the medical examiner can tell all of that.
If they find air in the lungs of an infant, that shows the baby was born alive. So suffocation can be easily proven
She didn't have a phone to call 911? Ok even if that was true she went to great lenths to dispose of the baby after the fact she could have put as much effort into getting medical help for her baby. If she didn't do anything wrong then why try to hide the baby? Unless you are trying to hide evidence of a crime she knew that baby didn't die of natural causes and thats why she got rid of her to hide her crime. These women need to stop having sex if they can't handle the responsibility of what can come of it
These adults need to use CONTRACEPTIVES when they have sex to prevent pregnancy and unwanted births. Fixed it for you. Never heard of CONTRACEPTIVES? Go look it up.
Why did she throw the baby away???
A question she alone can answer. Pure evil.
She was 35 at the time. Immaturity cannot be used as a rationale.
Hope the delayed justice for this poor baby is swift now and harsh!
😉👏🎯⚖️
“Oh cool” 😳😡🤦🏼♀️😞
How are they supposed to convict a person if the prosecutors can't show the evidence?
Well if the baby was just born… how would the birth mom, (grandma of the make up perp), not know?
Man shes my age
I cant imagine doing such a thing back
When i was 22
Pregnant
🫄
Just married
Graduate of college
Insane
Thank goodness for science, putting a name to baby. I was alarmed when granddaughter answered detective 'cool' 😳 when he mentioned her DNA was involved in solving a murder
This seems to be missing content 🙄
I know right I have so many questions!
It is. It's missing alot. I was just reading up on it.
Did the Grandmother birth the baby? I couldn't hear on the audio, sounded all muffled .
Yes it was grandma
Chick is way too excited about being connected through blood to this poor murdered infant!
This is serious
1997?…..times were much better for a pregnant mother…..(not that ist okay in any time frame) there’s no excuse for this.
I bet when this technique came out and all these cases started getting solved, this woman started 💩ing herself. I’m sure there’s a LOT of people 💩ing themselves. Scared that they’ll get busted.
When the girl said a " DNA match", I thought she was an identical twin to the baby.
There’s no excuse for this ! She could have went to the abortion clinic and paid to have her baby murdered and she wouldn’t be charged with a crime !
Agreed. Even though a lot of people will disagree, I think it's better than this. Birth control & abstinence aren't always chosen.
@@KatB79both is murder so neither is good
Neither one was a good idea, either way is muy murder. She could have given the baby up for adoption.
😂😂😂😂😂😂
Baby safe drops started in texas as the Moses law 1999 . Other states followed 2001
When a pregnant woman is murdered, it’s classified as a double homicide. Yet, when a pregnant woman enters a Planned Parenthood clinic and a doctor ends the life of her healthy unborn child-dismembering the baby limb by limb, crushing the skull, and vacuuming out the remains-it is legally called “a choice,” with no charges brought against either the mother or the doctor.
This stark contrast highlights the insane inconsistency in our laws regarding the value of life before and shortly after birth. It also reflects a broader cultural acceptance of legalized killing under the guise of abortion which is nothing more than a cult of death.
Consider this scenario: if this mother had undergone a late-term abortion, no charges would have been filed. However, if she had given birth and the newborn died just minutes or hours later, it would be labeled a homicide. This disparity becomes even more alarming when states, like Virginia in recent years, have proposed laws permitting so-called "post-birth abortions."
At this time, the full details of this case, including the mental state of the mother, remain unclear. If she is to face charges for murder, then it begs the question-why are we not also holding accountable the women and doctors who deliberately take the lives of healthy unborn children through abortion?
This mother has undoubtedly endured unimaginable torment, and my prayers go out to her soul and for the judge(s) presiding over this case to rule with both compassion and justice.
@@jp4180 abortion is a medical procedure its not murder- don't spread misinformation please. We don't want what's happening in your stupid country america to happen in our country too🤡
@@jp4180 actually you cannot be charged a double homicide for a pregnant victim, at least in Michigan.
@@nathaliemorales3501 In the United States, the legal treatment of the killing of a pregnant woman varies by state, particularly concerning whether the fetus is recognized as a separate victim. As of January 2024, 39 states have enacted "fetal homicide" laws that recognize the unlawful killing of an unborn child as homicide in at least some circumstances.
It depends on the state. Some states do not have fetal homicide laws. If not then a fetus is not considered a victim unless they are born. I assume that medical examiners can tell if a newborn was actually birth alive or died in uterus thus a stillborn. Medical examiners said the infant was born alive, so it was a victim. Also she was 35 not some 16 yr old.
Your comment is insane. If it wasn’t for women like you shaming women for having abortions she may have had one. Let’s say she has an abortion at 12 weeks. Fetus wouldn’t have suffered. This lady wouldn’t be a murder and the fully grown baby, who can now feel pain, wouldn’t have suffered. People who believe in pro choice don’t want women to get abortions as much as you don’t. However when you force a woman to have a baby even more suffering happens. The world is imperfect and we have imperfect solutions. But your takeaway of this case that abortions are wrong shows your lack of critical thinking and or how small of a town you come From and lack of struggle.