I am so glad to see someone say that about Tessa! I find her rude and disrespectful, in particular, to Richard. As soon I see she is on the panel for any segment, I click off.
Fantastic show as always. And I love how you can have different opinions without interrupting and talking over each other. Good to hear different perspectives over such issues. And I love that Richard had to check the archetypes story wasn't an April fool's joke 🤭
Yay! No Tessa! And this is how you have a civilized conversation with different opinions. No interrupting the other person, no raising the voice to drown out all others. Tessa, raise the intellectual and logic level of your argument, not your voice.
So glad Tessa is not there. She's so argumentative in a disrespectful negative arrogant way. She has a warped view of the RF vs Harry and Meghan Markle. She's pro H&M. She misconstrueds twist the facts. Love Angela and Richard Eden they agree to disagree. Great journalists.
Saville was manipulating and sly, hoodwinking many people in different walks of life. Why keep focusing on Prince Charles? Fed-up with all this Royal--bashing, forgetting all the really good works they do.
William and Catherine are smart to have a small, tight circle of friends mainly from a long time ago that aren’t celebs. The rest of the men in the RF don’t have a lot of smarts in the judgement department. Camilla has helped Charles make better choices. Unfortunately, Andrew and Harry still aren’t making good choices.
They also said 'service is universal' - and then go on Oprah and praise the Queen left and right - when they've done nothing but insult and bash not only her and the whole family, but the UK, in which she is the Monarch.
Yes he pulled the wool over peoples eyes for sure, I think PC was pursued by Savile, don't forget, Savile had an Agenda to pursue Royal circles and curry favour to further his own ego and self importance in order to maintain the 'Facade' and gain all the residual benefits.
From what I understand a few people knew and covered up his behaviour , but most did not know . Margaret Thatcher was the one who pushed for his OBE He fooled a lot of people ! As for stirring it up , It seems to me that since Harry joined Netflix they’ve been producing negative content about the RF ?? Coincidence ?? I wonder 🤔
Perhaps we now know why Prince Andrew did not think Jeffrey Epstein could be dangerous when he met him. Prince Andrew had seen similar waters navigated before.
I've seen the Apple comparison so many times it's ridiculous. Apple didn't TM to stop grocery stores from using the name to advertise their fruit they did it so someone couldn't build a computer in their basement and slap the Apple logo on it. No different from other companies with proprietary products, like P&G. Looking at what they've written in the patent seems to me they want to stop anyone from ever using the word when it comes to any digital media ever again. It's unbelievable.
In that case The Beatles should sue Apple (the computer company) for selling/producing/ distributing music using the name! I personally doubt Steve Jobs etc would've used the name Apple if they'd never heard the Beatles music!
I do have to say that I agree that PC is very bad at assessing people. This is even seen in his choice of life partner in Diana (totally incompatible as they were) which made both their lives miserable. Even approving his sons marriage to MM
Those of you not from Britain or a country with a Monarchy need to shut up.. you have no idea the way things work.. Charles had no choice about marrying Diana.. it was different times then.. and stop believing all the shit the media put out.. they are desperate to demonise the monarchy and idiots like you just swallow it 😡🇬🇧
Regarding Charles and Savile- it was nearly 30 years ago and we, including everyone that personally knew Savile, didn't have the benefit of foresight, only hindsight.
At the time everybody thought Jimmy was wonderful. The BBC covered for him right up until the very last minute. They have a long record of protecting such people,ie Rolf Harries,Stuart Hall,certain disc jockeys etc.
Yes the times need to be considered. Sadly, people are products of their times. Doesn't condone the behavior of Jimmy Saville but does help to account for the reactions of the public.
My parents are from Charles's generation, never befriended anyone who publicly behaved as repulsively as Saville did. So, so much for that argument of yours. Poor judgement and dodgy choices of friendship are transversal to time and space. Charles has good things about him, but I'm afraid that ethically this completely disqualifies him to be the next monarch. And anyone who refuses to see that one huge piece of writing on the wall is a HUGE part of the problem! As one of the kids abused by Saville I personally would not want to have one of his dearest friends as my king. So if people like you can't do common sense then, at least, try some basic empathy.
The problem it's not just Jimmy Savil. Let's not forget Charles close relationship to Bishop Peter Ball and let's not forget the RF friendship Epstein, Maxwell, Rolf Harris and God knows how many more than we still don't know about. It seems the RF loves to surround itself with this kind of people. They say birds of a feather flock together.
@@beatriz9376 I can see your point of view. I don't agree with it however. Decades ago societal expectations were different. Judging people in the past with today's standards is not fair, imo. Seems like pedophiles were more common back then?? Or folks were generally more circumspect so one wasn't aware of another's sexual preferences? Hard to say but my guess is PC vets his associates more carefully and more skillfully now than was done in the past.
@@beatriz9376 So your saying today is exactly like it was 40yrs ago if so you should notify the rest of the world I presumed we changed from those times obviously not so time really stands still .Perhaps all this woke thing etc should be ignored then if its all been around for so long we already know everything so stop the demos nothing needs to be improved just stick to the past.
He is the bad character himself. MM isn’t the one having or who had an adulterous relationship while still being married. MM isn’t the one who had a close friendship with a renowned pedophile who abused hundreds of children knowing that they were abusing children. Get out of here with that stupid act of trying to make the royal family members victims when they are the villains here.
All working members of the Royal Family should have advisers who can speak honestly to them and give sound advice without fear of job loss. The Royals should immediately get rid of any yes men and sycophants for their own good!
@@virginiawomack7167 no but some were Government ministers one was even the then Prime Minister people forget how popular Saville was fix it alone got 20 to 25 million viewers and by the 80s he'd already been at the top of the tree for twenty plus years most people saw him as a good if eccentric guy who raised a stack of money for charity.
Meghan is greedy on steroids. She wants to put out a podcast called Archetypes. Don't restrict other people from using that word on lectures, books, businesses etc.
People do this all the time; she's not the only person who does this; this call protects your business name.Beyonce and many people do this. It calls doing business.so what's the big deal with her and Harry doing it.wish them many blessings
Stop spreading lies and inform yourself.What she's doing is a common thing in the podcast business.Why bother so much about someone who gives a toss about you?
We can all look back in time and think knowing such and such was a mistake . Its a joke to think that things that come out years after someone is exposed for their life style these people bring up today just to cause trouble.If these know alls knew about these things how come they never said anything at the time. We are all great after the facts.
It's all rewriting history the truth is very few people knew anything about Saville at all until a year after he died and ITV did the exposure programme.
Yes what are the next plotted shenanigans out of Narc-le's bag of dirty tricks ? 😏 As for JS 😱When somebody looks like a sickly creepy , disgusting , and troubled individual, they probably are.
My parents are from Charles's generation, never befriended anyone who publicly behaved as repulsively as Saville did. So, so much for that incredibly poor, and honestly insulting, argument of ''those were the times''. Poor judgement and dodgy choices of friendship are transversal to time and space. Charles has good things about him, but I'm afraid that ethically this completely disqualifies him to be the next monarch. And anyone who refuses to see that one huge piece of writing on the wall is a HUGE part of the problem! If I were one of the kids abused by Saville I personally would not want to have one of his dearest friends as my king. So if people like Angela can't do common sense, then at least they could try some basic empathy.
@@simongarthwaite7695 People KNEW that he was inappropriate and that he was predating over young girls, because that is how open he himself was about it. And yet they condoned that kind of behavior! The general public didn’t know that he was raping children but it at least knew that he was a creep. His behavior was exposed in the newspapers and still the queen knighted him after that!? Oi, just how is that acceptable Britain?? Wake the heck up! How could Charles continue a friendship with him knowing of how so very inappropriate he was with young women!? Just how?? Way before knowing that he was a child sexual predator, people did know that he was a sick creep of the worst order, so Charles obviously knew about that too! I repeat: how is that acceptable, according to which culture, country or creed is it acceptable for the future king of a nation to consort with, and be best friends with, an individual whom he knows predates on young women?? Even if he didn’t yet know that there were also children involved, just how is that acceptable behavior of Your future king?? Just How Britain!? Wake the f.. k up! People KNEW, it’s known fact now that it was an open secret! To even imply that Charles didn’t know that there was something going on is to give him a stupidity certificate and call him a retard. As I said before, people like you who can’t handle the truth and refuse to see are a HUGE part of the problem. It was people like you who let it happen and allowed for him to get knighted.
of course Charles would have known about Mountbatten he would also have known about Saville with all the mi5 mi6 and god knows how many other police officials that surround them are you seriously saying they dont know they had to have been warned about the possibility the same as Andrew would have known about Epstein having had a prison sentence, there is no way they would not have been told ,another reason why Charles and his mrs should never be king and queen it is offensive to think that Charles would be the head of the Church of England its also hypocritical
Really Angela! I don't think raising money for a charity where you are planning to exploit it beneficiaries is a defence. The Palace has many advisors so I can't see why Charles would send a batchlor to rehabilitate Sarah Ferguson. Why would it have anything to do with Charles his own marriage was a total mess? He was irresponsible enough to let handwritten letters to a TV personality get I to the public domain for goodness sake. Charles' medeling in things which don't concern him is legendary. He must have gone over the Queen and Prince Philip's head as he was only the Prince of Wales at the time. Something he is renowned for doing. If he had spent less time worrying about Andrew and concentrated on his own marriage he wouldn't be in this predicament. I agree Charles is of his time but he his lack of judgment is continuously undermining William and Catherine's hard work in bring the monarchy up to date. I wager now that Charles is nearing the throne we will see a true picture of Charles as an interfering busybody come to light. He has always been about his own image at the expense of other members of his family. IMHO Perhaps, Charles just can't take advice.
Angela Levin is the worst sycophant for Prince Charles, my gawd, he has terrible discerning to no ability whatsoever. Poor Richard having to debate, she should go home.
I'm American and I have always enjoyed following the Royal Family and their history. I am Diana's age so I watched all of that in real time. I think I was pretty neutral about everyone except that I always felt sorry for Princess Margaret. That being said.... As the years have passed and more facts have come out, I think make people give Charles the benefit of the doubt because their affection for the RF clouds their critical thinking about them. IF it had only been Jimmy Saville, hmmm.... BUT, it was also that priest, and also Lord Mountbatten, who happened to have been a HUGE influence in Prince Charle's life. The people that you hang around with are people that you have things in common with. Look at Jeffrey Epstein's friends.... They ALL knew what he was doing because they were doing it also, with him. (And yes, i think Prince Andrew participated... Of COURSE he did. If he hadn't, he would have presented the "evidence" he said he had that he never did... He would have TALKED to the police etc, but he never did.) So WHO you hang out with absolutely is who you are if you hang out with them for YEARS. THAT is human nature..If Angela L wants to claim that PC was unaware, then she would have to be saying that PC is utterly stupid, and I don't think that. (And I generally like what Angela L has to say). But I do not think PC is stupid...I DO think that he has kept his own peccadillos out of the spotlight for years. But there's a reason for the saying... Birds of a feather flock together. NO ONE hangs around someone for YEARS and has no inkling. Look at Angela's story of meeting Jimmy S..... FIRST TIME she meets him and she already got the feeling that he was a creep. You can fool people in the media (presenting oneself however one wants on TV) but people you hang out with in person will see things. I am not blinded by loyalty to the RF so I think I can see more clearly and I think Prince Charles has had his own past with P€d0****** issues. It's ugly, but that's why it's been hidden.
The Wind is behind Harry and Harry, because of the love the world has for them . The Royal Establishment, the British Tabloids are trying so hard to destroy them and they will never succeed. H&M will thrive and sail through their present and future challenges. Strength is made perfect in adversity.
I dont know about the wind behind them... I know it comes from the Bottom in their faces All the BS that comes from them, they could start their own fertiliser business & they would make their fortunes! You could write to them & suggest it, may be they would offer you a job as chief shit stirer... sounds like you are the manure type 🇬🇧👧
I dont agree with you At all this has all been draged up by the Sugar mob to bring down the RF. From my point of view Savell was liked and respected by all classes and its been proven he was a disgusting inhumain thing Now we know and if only we had known anyone can be clever as an after thought
Meghan just keeps on WINNING! The diabolical and hilarious British obsession with Meghan has not only catapulted her to global superstar status, but has also made her a billionaire, and counting. And even though she hasn’t set stiletto on UK soil, she’s STILL often the number one topic on most publications, internet and TV shows. She alone trumps every other senior and minor royal combined X’s 10! 😆 You people can’t and won’t stop obsessing about her. And now the ROTA are already there or on their way to The INVICTUS Games. Even though they all said they’d no longer report about Meghan. They’ve NEVER stopped for one second. If the other royals weren’t so Unaccomplished, uninspiring, uninteresting and underwhelming, she’d be a footnote in history. But alas, my fellow Cali girl has left an entire nation sprung and there’s no replacement. HILARIOUS🤣
ARCHETYPES is already world famous from the extraordinary work by master Psychologist Carl Jung!!! This is not debatable that someone can come along and copyright somebody’s preexisting world famous work title of stellar proportion. I find it embarrassing at best that this would even be considered as acceptable for a copyright to be had in this case! The Jung family has worked extensively in protecting the treasured work of Carl Jung.
Have to agree with many of the commenters about tessa ( i wont give her name a capital letter she doesnt merit one) There isnt any reason to become hostile in getting ones point over It smacks of vulgarity & ignorance! I like Angela Levin & Richard they can disagree on various topics but like opposing lawyers or barristers, who can be as acerbic as Bitter Aloes in court but once they leave, its off to the pub or club & are the best of chums. My 1st husband was a Barrister QC & was the most charming yet cunning person in the courtroom i used to call him the Prince of Darkness! However outside those doors he was the most delightful, courteous & full of hilarious banter & a kinder person you couldnt meet So, as long as you have your facts straight & facts checked out with proof, believe 100% in your opinion then a respectful debate, is not just interesting to listen to but allowing your opposition to state their views etc is in my opinion de rigeur & gives every one else listening the clarity & opportunity to form their views that they hadnt thought about before But, to shout out over someone else speaking, raising your voice & adopting a dictatorial attitude just shows disrespect to the other persons & their views & your audience & most of all shows your own insecurities & fear which is at centre of people Like tessa. I have no time for journalists & other media big mouths who bully either collegues or others who have been invited onto a forum as they have as much right to say their piece as the likes of tessa types If i were a media executive & my show contained a disagreeable & hostile guest who insulted other guests & shouted them down & bullying every one then they wouldnt be invited back. People like tessa think they are so " woke " & on the ball, insisting on aggressive tactics to Hammer home their point of view & everyone else is insignificant Sub humans & have no idea These people are being contrary for the sake of it Its not that they want a certain view to topple others but want their vindictive hostility to make a name for themselves If, in their minds, they can make such an outstanding( not in a good way) impression on screen that their rude & aggressive performance sticks in people's minds & thus raises their profile then they are successful & a rising star ✴ Like the critics in Hollywood say As long as you make the headlines for good or bad, it keeps you in vogue ! Maybe that was true once but in todays climate, it might get you so far but you wont stay in there You will descend much quicker with no friends to support you Those " nasty bits of work" such As tessa will be yesterdays newspapers & only fit to wrap Up ones vegetable peelings & thrown in the garbage. The only ones who succeed & stay on top are courteous, of high intellect, master of wit, with a low controlled voice putting over their opinions in such a charming way that all heads nod in agreement Madam tessa needs to study the great orators & critics who mastered their art & are still admired after their demise or have kept their exhaulted positions in their life time. These tessa types are 10 a penny & as viewing figures decrease each time they appear on air, then media bosses will do a " Pearl" on them.. Thank you Mail for your enjoyable show 🇬🇧👧😆
sorry but if the royal family had an ounce of awareness of their actions they would not need a pr team they should not need a pr team they need an education team to teach them how to stomp out their entitlement and super arrogant behaviour Andrew being the prime example
Many are in denial as how bad Andrew international scandal is. But thinks H&M is worse so they talk about them everyday. It is the reason I have no respect for this lot. All because of how they come out everyday and attack them. They let the Prince of Pork, Mile High Andy, Prince Pinnochio. Randy Andy run wild and still a residence of royal lodge. Unbelievable
Love Ms. Angela Levin and Mr. Richard Eden!❤️❤️❤️
My two favorite royal correspondents: Angela Levin and Richard Eden. They disagree and agrue their points but do so respectfully. Take note Tessa.
Amen!!
I am so glad to see someone say that about Tessa! I find her rude and disrespectful, in particular, to Richard. As soon I see she is on the panel for any segment, I click off.
X2!
True. Not to mention she's often an apologist for Harry and Meghan.
Tessa is loud and argumentative. In my opinion.
Saville fooled the whole of the UK! Let's keep this in context.
I really enjoy watching Angela Levin & Richard Eden
OMG TWO OF MY FAVORITE PEOPLE!!!! Thank you for bringing Angela !!! Love her and Richard!!! Love ❤️ from USA 🇺🇸
I love seeing Angela and Richard...two of my favorite royal reporters!...please bring them on more!
Fantastic show as always. And I love how you can have different opinions without interrupting and talking over each other. Good to hear different perspectives over such issues. And I love that Richard had to check the archetypes story wasn't an April fool's joke 🤭
It's a much better show without Tessa.
Angela and Richard together is fantastic!
Totally agree with you Laura
Me too!!!
Angela & Richard is a good duo, Yin & Yang. Also, it's lovely to see Angela on this platform. Mail+ can you please have her again?
Yay! No Tessa!
And this is how you have a civilized conversation with different opinions. No interrupting the other person, no raising the voice to drown out all others.
Tessa, raise the intellectual and logic level of your argument, not your voice.
So glad Tessa is not there. She's so argumentative in a disrespectful negative arrogant way. She has a warped view of the RF vs Harry and Meghan Markle. She's pro H&M. She misconstrueds twist the facts. Love Angela and Richard Eden they agree to disagree. Great journalists.
Can’t stand her !!! I hope they look at our comment and bring her back on the show again!!!!
You've got to have diversity of opinions.
@@susantunbridge4612 You can get them from many other people who are not "Shouty", don't interrupt and don't belittle.
Richard and Angela . Fav panel
A lot of people were duped by Jimmy Saville. He volunteered at a hospital for years !
Saville was manipulating and sly, hoodwinking many people in different walks of life. Why keep focusing on Prince Charles? Fed-up with all this Royal--bashing, forgetting all the really good works they do.
Got to hand it to him. Jimmy was a manipulative monster, bit of a narc like the new one Megain.
Good discussion. Thank you for not featuring the obnoxious Tessa. 👍👍
Omg, poor Angela. What a sleezebag Saville was!
The word "repulsive" is an excellent word to describe Saville who was an incredibly creepy man.
William and Catherine are smart to have a small, tight circle of friends mainly from a long time ago that aren’t celebs. The rest of the men in the RF don’t have a lot of smarts in the judgement department. Camilla has helped Charles make better choices. Unfortunately, Andrew and Harry still aren’t making good choices.
Got nothing to do with americans .. keep your beak out of British business .sort your own crap hole of a country out.. 😡🇬🇧
Angela Levin is lovely. A wonderful addition to the show.
They also said 'service is universal' - and then go on Oprah and praise the Queen left and right - when they've done nothing but insult and bash not only her and the whole family, but the UK, in which she is the Monarch.
Cut Prince Charles a bit of slack. Everyone at the time thought Jimmy Savile was great. Unfortunately the truth did not come to life until ages after
So true. I have casual acquaintances that I’m sure I don’t know everything about
Saville pulled the wool over most peoples eyes but PC shouldn't be going to celebrities for PR advice at all.
Yes he pulled the wool over peoples eyes for sure, I think PC was pursued by Savile, don't forget, Savile had an Agenda to pursue Royal circles and curry favour to further his own ego and self importance in order to maintain the 'Facade' and gain all the residual benefits.
Yeah,Angela and Richard!! Thank God, T isnt around to interrupt.
I love Angela and Richard. Common sense.
Love Angela. Tells it like it is.
Omg! Poor Angela!
Love Angela 🤩😍👏
Worse than Piers Morgan, Dan Wootton, and Richard in her lever of English arrogance.
SO!!! No one knew what Jimmy was doing!! No one did!! Other than a few reporters!!! Some people just want to STIR things up!!
Agree just another stick to beat the Royals with.. those of them commenting on here and calling Charles need to stfu. 🇬🇧
From what I understand a few people knew and covered up his behaviour , but most did not know . Margaret Thatcher was the one who pushed for his OBE
He fooled a lot of people ! As for stirring it up , It seems to me that since Harry joined Netflix they’ve been producing negative content about the RF ?? Coincidence ?? I wonder 🤔
I think this channel /show is really well done!
Perhaps we now know why Prince Andrew did not think Jeffrey Epstein could be dangerous when he met him. Prince Andrew had seen similar waters navigated before.
I love the April fool joke...
#cancelmeghanmarkle
Hind sight is always 20/20
Hindsight is a great thing
I've seen the Apple comparison so many times it's ridiculous. Apple didn't TM to stop grocery stores from using the name to advertise their fruit they did it so someone couldn't build a computer in their basement and slap the Apple logo on it. No different from other companies with proprietary products, like P&G. Looking at what they've written in the patent seems to me they want to stop anyone from ever using the word when it comes to any digital media ever again. It's unbelievable.
In that case The Beatles should sue Apple (the computer company) for selling/producing/ distributing music using the name! I personally doubt Steve Jobs etc would've used the name Apple if they'd never heard the Beatles music!
richard is one of the few to have the courage to say it !
Glad Richard also brought up creepy 'Uncle Dickie.' 🤮
Oh look who’s here! I love Angela! 😍
We like when you two are together
The word archetype first entered the English language around the 1540s and has Latin and Greek origins.
I do have to say that I agree that PC is very bad at assessing people. This is even seen in his choice of life partner in Diana (totally incompatible as they were) which made both their lives miserable. Even approving his sons marriage to MM
Those of you not from Britain or a country with a Monarchy need to shut up.. you have no idea the way things work.. Charles had no choice about marrying Diana.. it was different times then.. and stop believing all the shit the media put out.. they are desperate to demonise the monarchy and idiots like you just swallow it 😡🇬🇧
CHARLES WAS PUSHED INTO MARRYING DIANA it is proven
OZZ
He didn't choose her which was the problem. She was chosen for him. Then forced to follow through.
great post!
Glad to see no sign of Tessa, please stick with Angela and Richard, real Royal reporter's, Tessa waffles on and on and makes no sense !
No Tessa? 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
🤪👏🏾👌🎺🎉💓💯🎶
Didn’t they confiscate and trademark the Queen’s nickname?
The did what they did before someone else rush and did it. Beyonce did the same for blue ivy name
@@xxx-iz4uq They took something that wasn’t theirs to take, from his grandmother.
Rachel's podcast will never be big enough for her ego.
Regarding Charles and Savile- it was nearly 30 years ago and we, including everyone that personally knew Savile, didn't have the benefit of foresight, only hindsight.
if we are going to talk about poor judgement look no further than Andrew.
Exactly right under their nose for 30 years. Never hear Angela and the other royal rodents talk about him daily but they attack Harry & Meghan.
Never ,ever liked the man .There was something very slimy and sly about him and I'm talking in the early 1970s
"Control" is essential to MM. Just look at H.
Like father like son then Camilla control for 50 years. Even broke up 2 marriages.
At the time everybody thought Jimmy was wonderful. The BBC covered for him right up until the very last minute. They have a long record of protecting such people,ie Rolf Harries,Stuart Hall,certain disc jockeys etc.
Yes the times need to be considered. Sadly, people are products of their times. Doesn't condone the behavior of Jimmy Saville but does help to account for the reactions of the public.
My parents are from Charles's generation, never befriended anyone who publicly behaved as repulsively as Saville did. So, so much for that argument of yours. Poor judgement and dodgy choices of friendship are transversal to time and space. Charles has good things about him, but I'm afraid that ethically this completely disqualifies him to be the next monarch. And anyone who refuses to see that one huge piece of writing on the wall is a HUGE part of the problem! As one of the kids abused by Saville I personally would not want to have one of his dearest friends as my king. So if people like you can't do common sense then, at least, try some basic empathy.
The problem it's not just Jimmy Savil. Let's not forget Charles close relationship to Bishop Peter Ball and let's not forget the RF friendship Epstein, Maxwell, Rolf Harris and God knows how many more than we still don't know about. It seems the RF loves to surround itself with this kind of people. They say birds of a feather flock together.
@@beatriz9376 I can see your point of view. I don't agree with it however. Decades ago societal expectations were different. Judging people in the past with today's standards is not fair, imo. Seems like pedophiles were more common back then?? Or folks were generally more circumspect so one wasn't aware of another's sexual preferences? Hard to say but my guess is PC vets his associates more carefully and more skillfully now than was done in the past.
@@thewordwilltriumph2144 Oh please. you talk as if this happened hundreds of years ago. This has happened as recently as Charles and Andrews.
@@beatriz9376 So your saying today is exactly like it was 40yrs ago if so you should notify the rest of the world I presumed we changed from those times obviously not so time really stands still .Perhaps all this woke thing etc should be ignored then if its all been around for so long we already know everything so stop the demos nothing needs to be improved just stick to the past.
Charles is a bad judge of character - MM for example!!
What’s that got to do with Charles.. Harry married the tramp ..😡🇬🇧
He is the bad character himself. MM isn’t the one having or who had an adulterous relationship while still being married. MM isn’t the one who had a close friendship with a renowned pedophile who abused hundreds of children knowing that they were abusing children. Get out of here with that stupid act of trying to make the royal family members victims when they are the villains here.
Wildflower.charles wasnt the one who was involved with her.
All working members of the Royal Family should have advisers who can speak honestly to them and give sound advice without fear of job loss. The Royals should immediately get rid of any yes men and sycophants for their own good!
well there goes Angela Levin
She must be archietyping
Yes. Put it in time. Also are we relying on newspaper articles?.
There is NOT ONE EXCUSE for Savile and as much as I adore Angela, I’m disappointed in her attempts to justify Charlie’s poor choices.
Savile fooled a lot of people let's not try to rewrite history.
@@simongarthwaite7695 And the other fools were not the FUTURE King of England. Sadly, Savile is only one of Charlie’s horrible choices.
@@virginiawomack7167 no but some were Government ministers one was even the then Prime Minister people forget how popular Saville was fix it alone got 20 to 25 million viewers and by the 80s he'd already been at the top of the tree for twenty plus years most people saw him as a good if eccentric guy who raised a stack of money for charity.
Daily Mail is also trademark.
Meghan is greedy on steroids. She wants to put out a podcast called Archetypes. Don't restrict other people from using that word on lectures, books, businesses etc.
People do this all the time; she's not the only person who does this; this call protects your business name.Beyonce and many people do this. It calls doing business.so what's the big deal with her and Harry doing it.wish them many blessings
Stop spreading lies and inform yourself.What she's doing is a common thing in the podcast business.Why bother so much about someone who gives a toss about you?
@@Sfmpg More to be pity than to blame.
It seems to me someone who was close to the RF is leaking all this stuff one thing after the other as payback for being cut off financially...
Absolutely Diana Whyte!! ..Totally agree with you!! ...AGENDA!!!
Goodjob
Megan probably trying to get back in the market . I mean yacht market .
@@Sfmpg yes ...perfect for her. 'yacht girl" ...and how to be one of them
Praise the Lord they'll never be KING & QUEEN
So happy to read that almost nobody misses annoying Tessa.
We can all look back in time and think knowing such and such was a mistake . Its a joke to think that things that come out years after someone is exposed for their life style these people bring up today just to cause trouble.If these know alls knew about these things how come they never said anything at the time. We are all great after the facts.
It's all rewriting history the truth is very few people knew anything about Saville at all until a year after he died and ITV did the exposure programme.
FFS Royal Reporters - Savile was hugely popular in those days, with everyone. C’mon.
The wonderful Val McDermid made Jimmy Savile into Jacko Vance, the villain (or antagonist, as one is supposed to say) of Wire in the Blood.
What’s MM up to now? Making mischief and mayhem as usual, no doubt!!😈🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧God save the Queen 👑🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
Yes what are the next plotted shenanigans out of Narc-le's bag of dirty tricks ? 😏
As for JS 😱When somebody looks like a sickly creepy , disgusting , and troubled individual, they probably are.
They have been denied the request they are not allowed to make it their brand solely.
Diana met Saville . She thought he was a sleeze ball.
If he licked my arm I'd sock him, also giving that guy a home ! Unbeliveble
My parents are from Charles's generation, never befriended anyone who publicly behaved as repulsively as Saville did. So, so much for that incredibly poor, and honestly insulting, argument of ''those were the times''. Poor judgement and dodgy choices of friendship are transversal to time and space. Charles has good things about him, but I'm afraid that ethically this completely disqualifies him to be the next monarch. And anyone who refuses to see that one huge piece of writing on the wall is a HUGE part of the problem! If I were one of the kids abused by Saville I personally would not want to have one of his dearest friends as my king. So if people like Angela can't do common sense, then at least they could try some basic empathy.
Almost nobody knew that's the point have you have forgotten his funeral the thousands lining the streets etc
@@simongarthwaite7695 People KNEW that he was inappropriate and that he was predating over young girls, because that is how open he himself was about it. And yet they condoned that kind of behavior! The general public didn’t know that he was raping children but it at least knew that he was a creep. His behavior was exposed in the newspapers and still the queen knighted him after that!? Oi, just how is that acceptable Britain?? Wake the heck up! How could Charles continue a friendship with him knowing of how so very inappropriate he was with young women!? Just how?? Way before knowing that he was a child sexual predator, people did know that he was a sick creep of the worst order, so Charles obviously knew about that too! I repeat: how is that acceptable, according to which culture, country or creed is it acceptable for the future king of a nation to consort with, and be best friends with, an individual whom he knows predates on young women?? Even if he didn’t yet know that there were also children involved, just how is that acceptable behavior of Your future king?? Just How Britain!? Wake the f.. k up! People KNEW, it’s known fact now that it was an open secret! To even imply that Charles didn’t know that there was something going on is to give him a stupidity certificate and call him a retard. As I said before, people like you who can’t handle the truth and refuse to see are a HUGE part of the problem. It was people like you who let it happen and allowed for him to get knighted.
Project Gaia THANK YOU!
@@simongarthwaite7695 Did they know about the 500+ children he Mole ested? That speaks to their "character" and proves Project Gaia's point.
After listening to all this, I wonder the heck why Andrew is ostrosised
of course Charles would have known about Mountbatten he would also have known about Saville with all the mi5 mi6 and god knows how many other police officials that surround them are you seriously saying they dont know they had to have been warned about the possibility the same as Andrew would have known about Epstein having had a prison sentence, there is no way they would not have been told ,another reason why Charles and his mrs should never be king and queen it is offensive to think that Charles would be the head of the Church of England its also hypocritical
Theres another word ARCHOLE let them paten that. Its more suited for there brand.of lies,advice, & where they will end up
Who cares? She sued you guys already. Round two I suppose??
Yes too big
REPUBLIC...anyone?
Charles is the weak link,I’m not talking about saville,honours etc, he is known to NOT like to deal with anything that might ruffle his space or life.
She's been gone 3 years and you clowns can't keep her name out your mouth 😂😂😂
Really Angela! I don't think raising money for a charity where you are planning to exploit it beneficiaries is a defence.
The Palace has many advisors so I can't see why Charles would send a batchlor to rehabilitate Sarah Ferguson.
Why would it have anything to do with Charles his own marriage was a total mess?
He was irresponsible enough to let handwritten letters to a TV personality get I to the public domain for goodness sake.
Charles' medeling in things which don't concern him is legendary.
He must have gone over the Queen and Prince Philip's head as he was only the Prince of Wales at the time. Something he is renowned for doing.
If he had spent less time worrying about Andrew and concentrated on his own marriage he wouldn't be in this predicament.
I agree Charles is of his time but he his lack of judgment is continuously undermining William and Catherine's hard work in bring the monarchy up to date.
I wager now that Charles is nearing the throne we will see a true picture of Charles as an interfering busybody come to light.
He has always been about his own image at the expense of other members of his family. IMHO
Perhaps, Charles just can't take advice.
Charles has come a long way in the last decade for me at present he looks every inch a King in waiting Camilla has done wonders for him
Re; Apple - it is connected with a trademarked LOGO!!!
So the program is not a creative series for television, but instead a factual documentary??
YES MEN no way his uncle was not so good !
The headings and the videos have NO CORRELATION
NOW is COME
The Downfall of an Empire
One Prince After Another
FALLS FROM THE GRACE
Of The Oaths They Take
You are a poet and dont know it.lol
Angela Levin is the worst sycophant for Prince Charles, my gawd, he has terrible discerning to no ability whatsoever. Poor Richard having to debate, she should go home.
What about Charles connection to the WEF...klaus Scwab and members thereof.....It's unravelling. "You will own nothing"
Will the monarchy survive?
Charles knew who Savelle was, Diana said he was creepy. They all have their dirty little sex secrets and Savelle serviced them.
Hi
Saville dis not ingratiate himself with Princess Diana. She despised him, and stated this publicly.
I'm American and I have always enjoyed following the Royal Family and their history. I am Diana's age so I watched all of that in real time. I think I was pretty neutral about everyone except that I always felt sorry for Princess Margaret.
That being said.... As the years have passed and more facts have come out, I think make people give Charles the benefit of the doubt because their affection for the RF clouds their critical thinking about them.
IF it had only been Jimmy Saville, hmmm.... BUT, it was also that priest, and also Lord Mountbatten, who happened to have been a HUGE influence in Prince Charle's life.
The people that you hang around with are people that you have things in common with. Look at Jeffrey Epstein's friends.... They ALL knew what he was doing because they were doing it also, with him. (And yes, i think Prince Andrew participated... Of COURSE he did. If he hadn't, he would have presented the "evidence" he said he had that he never did... He would have TALKED to the police etc, but he never did.) So WHO you hang out with absolutely is who you are if you hang out with them for YEARS.
THAT is human nature..If Angela L wants to claim that PC was unaware, then she would have to be saying that PC is utterly stupid, and I don't think that. (And I generally like what Angela L has to say). But I do not think PC is stupid...I DO think that he has kept his own peccadillos out of the spotlight for years. But there's a reason for the saying... Birds of a feather flock together. NO ONE hangs around someone for YEARS and has no inkling. Look at Angela's story of meeting Jimmy S..... FIRST TIME she meets him and she already got the feeling that he was a creep. You can fool people in the media (presenting oneself however one wants on TV) but people you hang out with in person will see things. I am not blinded by loyalty to the RF so I think I can see more clearly and I think Prince Charles has had his own past with P€d0****** issues. It's ugly, but that's why it's been hidden.
The Wind is behind Harry and Harry, because of the love the world has for them .
The Royal Establishment, the British Tabloids are trying so hard to destroy them and they will never succeed.
H&M will thrive and sail through their present and future challenges. Strength is made perfect in adversity.
I dont know about the wind behind them...
I know it comes from the Bottom in their faces
All the BS that comes from them, they could start their own fertiliser business & they would make their fortunes!
You could write to them & suggest it, may be they would offer you a job as chief shit stirer... sounds like you are the manure type 🇬🇧👧
Please stop talking about the 2 shameful grifters, The Harkles.
Charles for king? is just like Biden here as President.
I dont agree with you At all this has all been draged up by the Sugar mob to bring down the RF. From my point of view Savell was liked and respected by all classes and its been proven he was a disgusting inhumain thing Now we know and if only we had known anyone can be clever as an after thought
Meghan just keeps on WINNING! The diabolical and hilarious British obsession with Meghan has not only catapulted her to global superstar status, but has also made her a billionaire, and counting.
And even though she hasn’t set stiletto on UK soil, she’s STILL often the number one topic on most publications, internet and TV shows.
She alone trumps every other senior and minor royal combined X’s 10! 😆
You people can’t and won’t stop obsessing about her.
And now the ROTA are already there or on their way to The INVICTUS Games. Even though they all said they’d no longer report about Meghan. They’ve NEVER stopped for one second.
If the other royals weren’t so Unaccomplished, uninspiring, uninteresting and underwhelming, she’d be a footnote in history.
But alas, my fellow Cali girl has left an entire nation sprung and there’s no replacement. HILARIOUS🤣
Zzzzzzz ...
ARCHETYPES is already world famous
from the extraordinary work by master Psychologist Carl Jung!!! This is not debatable that someone can come along and copyright somebody’s preexisting world famous work title of stellar proportion. I find it embarrassing at best that this would even be considered as acceptable for a copyright to be had in this case! The Jung family has worked extensively in protecting the treasured work of Carl Jung.
Have to agree with many of the commenters about tessa ( i wont give her name a capital letter she doesnt merit one)
There isnt any reason to become hostile in getting ones point over
It smacks of vulgarity & ignorance!
I like Angela Levin & Richard they can disagree on various topics but like opposing lawyers or barristers, who can be as acerbic as Bitter Aloes in court but once they leave, its off to the pub or club & are the best of chums.
My 1st husband was a Barrister QC & was the most charming yet cunning person in the courtroom i used to call him the Prince of Darkness!
However outside those doors he was the most delightful, courteous & full of hilarious banter & a kinder person you couldnt meet
So, as long as you have your facts straight & facts checked out with proof, believe 100% in your opinion then a respectful debate, is not just interesting to listen to but allowing your opposition to state their views etc is in my opinion de rigeur & gives every one else listening the clarity & opportunity to form their views that they hadnt thought about before
But, to shout out over someone else speaking, raising your voice & adopting a dictatorial attitude just shows disrespect to the other persons & their views & your audience & most of all shows your own insecurities & fear which is at centre of people
Like tessa.
I have no time for journalists & other media big mouths who bully either collegues or others who have been invited onto a forum as they have as much right to say their piece as the likes of tessa types
If i were a media executive & my show contained a disagreeable & hostile guest who insulted other guests & shouted them down & bullying every one then they wouldnt be invited back.
People like tessa think they are so " woke " & on the ball, insisting on aggressive tactics to
Hammer home their point of view & everyone else is insignificant
Sub humans & have no idea
These people are being contrary for the sake of it
Its not that they want a certain view to topple others but want their vindictive hostility to make a name for themselves
If, in their minds, they can make such an outstanding( not in a good way) impression on screen that their rude & aggressive performance sticks in people's minds & thus raises their profile then they are successful & a rising star ✴
Like the critics in Hollywood say
As long as you make the headlines for good or bad, it keeps you in vogue !
Maybe that was true once but in todays climate, it might get you so far but you wont stay in there
You will descend much quicker with no friends to support you
Those " nasty bits of work" such
As tessa will be yesterdays newspapers & only fit to wrap
Up ones vegetable peelings & thrown in the garbage.
The only ones who succeed & stay on top are courteous, of high intellect, master of wit, with a low controlled voice putting over their opinions in such a charming way that all heads nod in agreement
Madam tessa needs to study the great orators & critics who mastered their art & are still admired after their demise or have kept their exhaulted positions in their life time.
These tessa types are 10 a penny
& as viewing figures decrease each time they appear on air, then media bosses will do a
" Pearl" on them..
Thank you Mail for your enjoyable show 🇬🇧👧😆
The Jimmy Savile Netflix documentary was really good.
Why do you care? She’s irrelevant and an ex royal. Talk about those you claim. At what point do you all become an embarrassment to yourselves…
sorry but if the royal family had an ounce of awareness of their actions they would not need a pr team they should not need a pr team they need an education team to teach them how to stomp out their entitlement and super arrogant behaviour Andrew being the prime example
Many are in denial as how bad Andrew international scandal is. But thinks H&M is worse so they talk about them everyday. It is the reason I have no respect for this lot. All because of how they come out everyday and attack them. They let the Prince of Pork, Mile High Andy, Prince Pinnochio. Randy Andy run wild and still a residence of royal lodge. Unbelievable
She’s too big for you dear Mis Angela