Alhamdulillah! Bro plz after saying jesus plz say "Peace be upon him" And Yes Jesus (PBUH) Is messenger of Allah Note: God is not mentioned in the quran Allah is mentioned! There is no god but Allah!! Thank you...
@@George-iv1hi I know someone who read the Quran 10 times and memorizes it very well, I asked him about that and he said there's no such Surah Or Ayyah, Don't Talk about something you have no idea of please.
@@Alison-gc6gh Instead of reading this utter stupidity this someone could better invest hist time and efforts in learning real science. He could be wise man now, instead of brainless moron.
"Do you not know that to Allah belongs the dominion of the heavens and the earth and [that] you have not besides Allah any protector or any helper?" Al-Baqara : 107
Milad Jabali if your trying to convert people to christianity, here's a tip. Don't do it through the comment section of a video of a MUSLIM scholar giving a Q&A. AND don't reply to every comment using the same sentence. Try and mix it up a little bit.😂
@@AkidulIslameditor I understood your question and I've already promptly replied to you. The name of the guy asking questions in the video is Nabeel Kureshi, a well-learned Muslim turned Christian. Now, forget Nabeel's questions, why don't you check everything Zakir Naik has said like - The name of the island Charles Darwin went on it is not Kelotropis island it's Galapagos Island. - Check, read about Charles Darwin, his book the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. - Check his facts about Ice age! And the last one that makes me doubt your school education is Zaikir says Homo sapiens died 500,000 years ago. If you had gone to school and read your eighth grade's science books well, Homo sapiens is the scientific name for the human species. How did I know this? Good education, research, read the life of Charles Darwin, Galileo Galilei, and sound knowledge. Zakhir is talking so much about evolution stating as if he is convinced it's true wherein a Bible-believing Christian knows evolution is a man-made religion.
One thing I love seeing when I bing watch all these videos is how as Dr. Zakir grew older he became much more aggressive and firm in his answers Mashallah he’s definitely a full copy of Ahmed Deedat
Rushikesh Salve he is giving prove references you mad I don’t know why people are feel so bad instead if they feel the truth and reality... if you don’t believe don’t say anything wrong about anyone jus feel he is right and i am wrong... why people are still blind jealous... by the way mr bean was a great entertainer... your mom never told you?
@@Someone_KhabibbeatsJonesEASILYI don’t think he’s lying. I had a lot of these doubts and was scared and depressed. Dr zakir was a big part on how I started believing in Allah because athiests try showing evidence of mistakes in the Quran and all this stuff and most of them aren’t even true. So keep believing! ❤️
Even IF there was no God id rather live my life and die tomorrow believing I wasn't alone and that I would be rewarded for my good deeds, than dying alone and neither existing after that.
Believing also means not knowing. Instead of believing you could't say I don't know. When you say you believe, you refuse to learn and accept new thing, while when you say I don't know, you are basically open for any experience. No other living creature worships anything. It is only that our own logic and mind turned against us, so we started to believe instead of live. Only a uncertain and unconscious mind can think of such things as god. Those minds start to believe in thing because they are losing the joy or are not getting the point of living. They are not getting the point that every second is a unique moment of life that will never repeat it self, they are not getting the point that this paradise of life can be enjoyed only with a concious mind. Why should be a human being the centric point of universe? When we are just a microspec in this universe? Why can't people enjoy their life without knowing certain things? What ever is or not is after life, you gotta die first to find or not find out. So until then you should be conciously living life to the fullest! Don't waste you time with believing, waste your time in understanding the life on this planet as it is, once you understand how beautiful the life here is, you will apreciate every second of it!
Quran 21:30 Have those who disbelieved not considered that the heavens and the earth were a joined entity, and We separated them and made from water every living thing? Then will they not believe? How is this the BBT???
@@unknonwnplayer284 maybe you're so stubborn that you can't even process information ? ever heard of the golden ration ? well that's the proof you're looking for !
@@unknonwnplayer284 ur raised racist..this is why u cant do a proper debate on the matter and just trowing insults and saying stuff that doesnt make sense....now to counter it use some more slang sure that will win u and award
@@unknonwnplayer284 Dr zakir has answered in the video of whch ur commenting on,if u have any other question u can search them up am sure he has answered pretty much all the common quedtion atheist asks
@@akhtarreyaz376 I don't think u must use the word God. Allah is one. Allah is invisible. Allah has no gender. God has opposite sex goddess. How Allah is God. Islam says there is no god only Allah and "Hazrat Mohammad Rasulullah (S.A W) is the last messenger of Allah. So u must correct ur mistake.
Dj Hemp2o here is a few The Pairs in Creation Glory be to Him Who created all the pairs: from what the earth produces and from themselves and from things unknown to them." (The Qur'an, 37:36) Although the concept of ''pair'' or "couple" commonly stands for male and female, the statement of ''from things unknown to them'' has wider implications. Today, one of the implications of the verse has been revealed. The British scientist Paul Dirac, who proposed that matter is created in pairs, was awarded the Nobel Prize for physics in 1933. This discovery, called ''parité'', maintains that matter is paired with its opposite: anti-matter. Anti-matter carries the opposite properties to matter. For instance, as opposed to matter, the electron of anti-matter is positively charged and its protons are negatively charged. This fact is stated in a scientific source in this way: "...every particle has its antiparticle of opposite charge… …and the uncertainty relation tells us that pair creation and pair annihilation happen in the vacuum at all times, in all places."
Dj Hemp2o and there is the embryology cycle is described in details in the Quraan. The quraan is not a science book but a few have been described to show that there is a creator who created what is mentioned and who has to control of all these.
So because the Qur'an made a reference to reproduction, this automatically means that any other entity that exists in pairs or has an opposite is included in the mitigated compost you just posted? Wow so f***ing ludicrous. The idiots who assembled in their thatched huts to make this horse-shit up had absolutely no idea what they were talking about. Seriously, matter and antimatter? A single accurate reference doesn't justify the other garbage.
Thanks Alot Dr. Zakir i have a test of probability chapter and you were the one who have Clearified it with the best example. May Allah s.w.t grant all the muslims Jannah!
21:30 doesn't say anything about the bigbang. - "Have those who disbelieved not considered that the heavens and the earth were a joined entity, and We separated them and made from water every living thing? Then will they not believe?" - Y'all are being brainwashed, there is no bigbang in the Qur'an.
The theory states that all the matter in the universe came into existence from one single extremely hot and dense point; that exploded and brought about the beginning of the universe, matches what is mentioned in the verse that the heaven and Earth (thus the universe) where once joined together, and then split apart
do you think the big bang was just an explosion? how much do we know about the big bang? very little, then how can you compare two thing we know so little about and conclude that they are not the same.
No, science considers gravity as a frequency which behaves accordingly to mass, heat and other classifications of gas. What YOU are thinking +Mohamed Y, is the ONE scientist in New York who challenges newton's theory. However, if you read his article, he claims that heat and gas are what keeps us down on earth. Like I said at the beginning of this paragraph, heat, and gas contribute to the effect of gravitational force. For example: If you drop a bowling ball and a feather at the same time in an area in absence to air. They will hit the floor at the same time will similar velocity. Air resistance is what causes everything to remain 'afloat'. Without these gases "on earth," we would be crushed and glued to the earth's surface. However, in outer space (where all gasses are non-existent) you remain 'afloat' you don't fall immediately. You are pulled to a large mass. +Mohammed Y, gravity is a name for a force that exists and you can't disclaim it with a sentence which isn't even properly structured. :)
If any one studies Qur'an, he will have lots of proofs which will help him to tell the world about the existence of Almighty God. I am a fundamentalist Muslim and I am proud for that .
"Then We made the sperm into a clot of congealed blood, and of that clot We made an embryo; then We made out of that lump, bones, and clothed the bones with flesh. Then We developed another creation out of it. So blessed is God, the best of Creators” (Qur'an 23: 12-14) so can you explain why the quran is wrong about this?
Ha, pain in this world. The pain of hell is on a max level. Referring to the islamic description of the difference between the stages of hell being metaphorically described as the difference between a cold breeze and actual burning in fire... Slight increases in pain can be described as opposites themselves as the feelings are two different things. Go beyond increases in numerical measurement ( which you cannot compare as they are opposites anyway) and you can jump to a max. This is beyond ever rising increases and is a max jump. This itself can always be jumped with ever rising maxes. As logically it is always at a lower measure (as you could always increase it), Allah will create a set UPSIDE DOWN maximum beyond logic. By UPSIDE down I mean that it's not max in terms of "all" you can get, but max without limitation. SUBHANALLAH
@@George-iv1hi With due respect, the fact that you are educated and you are not utilizing what you have learned means shame on you! Relegion is a part of science, science is about the discovery and study of nature and universe while relegion is about worshiping the one and only God who created the universe. Science comprises of the facts and reasons that there is only one god and who deserve to be worshiped. Once you read Quran (the book revealed by Allah) without any bias and by understanding you will know. Many scientists, in past, did land on the conclusion of existence of God because of the irrefutable proof they had. Even today, we are still studying their theories and laws. May Allah grant you Hidhayah brother!
@@lawlietayezova3733 - the only thing I can tell about the Quran is that it has nothing to do with science. It refers to Noah's flood, something that definitely didn't happen. So Allah was wrong.
This Qu'ran is indeed the Word of Allah. There's no doubt about it. They can deny if they want, they can call it whatever they want, but the reality is, it is Almighty Allah who sent down this divine revelation. They are not the first disbelieve; they were many others who disbelieved before them, and they were destroyed. How can they disbelieve in Allah when they were dead, and then he created them? How? Zakir Naik should've mentioned the embryological stages of human development mentioned in the Qu'ran. That is a clear-cut proof that the Qu'ran is indeed from Allah--without a doubt. Islamaphobes will argue, and will say, "Oh, Aristotle knew this." No, he did not. He knew about the chick embryo, he did not know about the human embryo, or that it developed in stages, or what those stages were, or even what happened in those stages. And Allah mentions the complete human embryological development in several places on a microscopic level. Microscopic level! Meaning, you needed an electron microscope to figure this information out, otherwise it's impossible. Secondly, it cannot be a coincidence because it has been mentioned in several, several places what happens in the process of embryological development in exact, precise, and flawless detail. Thereby, it cannot be a coincidence. The only option left is that it is indeed a clear revelation from God. They can look up Dr. Keith Moore, if they do not believe me. Even many doctors have come to know this Qu'ran has to be from Allah; who else could write this divine book. Can they write anything like it? They criticize the Qu'ran, when they do not even know the first letter of Arabic. Instead ranting on here, I'd suggest learn Arabic, and then try to write anythng remotely close to the Qu'ran. They will not be able to do it. Allah's challenge is absolute, and even he has said they will never be able to do it. Ever. Call on your so-called scientists. Call on your philosophers. Call on your scholars. Call on your mathematicians. Call on whoever you want to. Even if all of mankind and jinn come together, they will never be able to fulfill this challenge. There are hundreds and hundreds of imitations of the Qu'ran---all of them false, and nothing like the true Qu'ran which Allah revealed. No one knew about the complete human embryological stages of development back in the day, especially not on a microscopic level. No one knew every living thing has been made from water. No one knew even the moon and sun have stages. No one knew about pain receptors. No one knew about the water cycle. No one knew that iron came from outer space. No one knew about the layers and layers of darkness in the sea. No one knew that mountains were like pegs in the Earth. No one knew the Earth was egg-shaped. No one knew every living thing has been created in pairs. No one knew the Universe was constantly expanding. No one knew how the universe began; it says in the Qu'ran very clearly, "Do not the unbelievers see the heavens and earth were one, and then we separated them." Who could've known this? It's impossible. There are other miracles in Qu'ran, and Moses (Musa A.S), has been mentioned quite frequently. The name Haman has been mentioned 6 times, and it says he was the Chief Minister for the Pharaoh at the time of Musa A.S. In modern age, Egyptologists who study hieroglyphics and such have come to know, there is quite literally a list of people who used to work for the Pharaoh at the time Musa A.S. The language for hieroglyphics was already lost 2000 years before Muhammad Sallahu Alaihi Wasallum. So it is impossible for someone to know this. Impossible. That alone should prove to someone that Qu'ran has to be from God. Has to be. Who else could write such a beautiful book with perfect, divine eloquence. If you even listen to a Quraanic recitation, you'll realize how beautiful it is. You'll realize with that alone, it cannot be the Word of Man. It can't be. The people back then, when they heard this divine eloquence, they became Muslims, because they realized Muhammad P.B.U.H was no poet, nor was he a soothsayer. They realized these are the Words of their true Lord. If you ask me, even they have more intelligence than the so-called scientists of today. In addition, there are countless linguistic miracles in the Qu'ran. For example writing entire sentences---sentences, not words---but sentences in a palindrome. You'll find many linguistic miracles in Surah Bakarah, and in Ayat-ul-Kursi. There are many mathematical miracles in the Qu'ran. For instance, there is a certain ayat in the Qu'ran, in which, if used properly, you can calculate the speed of light. Surah Ar-Rahman has a huge mathematical miracle, in which all the repeated ayats (for emphasis of course), if every verse is numbered properly, they are perfect divisible of 7. The number 7 and 19 are extremely significant in the Qu'ran. The number 19 is very significant for the Jews and Christians, because there are 19 angels which will watch over the People of Hell. Only in their Hebrew Scriptures, they knew of this. So, this is clear proof for the Jews and Christians that Muhammad Sallahu Alaihi Wassalum could not have written the Qu'ran (naudhibillallah). No way. He did not know how to read or write, let alone know Hebrew. In fact, he was the most modest among all the people. If you study his lifestyle, you will come to know he has never told a single lie. Ever. He was trusted even by his enemies; that's how modest, and trustworthy he was. The people knew him for 40 years; so how could someone who could never tell a lie against his people, tell a lie about God. Does it seem logical? Use your brains. He only told the truth. And he was prophecized in all the other worldly scriptures---especially in the Bible---that he would come, and he did come. He was indeed a real Messenger of the Almighty, and he only told the truth. Read the hadith, and the Qu'ran, and study his lifestyle, and you will come to know that he was indeed a true Prophet; in fact, the seal of the Prophets. Moreover, if you can't even write anything like the Qu'ran, which consists of mathematical, linguistic, and scientific miracles, and you of course, will never be able to, then try to find a contradiction in the Qu'ran. Any kind of error. You will not be able to. You'll go online, and many ignorant people will state this is an error, or that is an error, or this is a contradiction. It is not. It is either out of context, out of background, misinterpreted, mistranslated, or they do not understand what came before the ayat, or what came after it. They do not understand the whole of the surah (chapter), the verses before or after; they do not even know the first letter of Arabic, and they dare to criticize. Go ask a scholar, and they will explain everything to you, and you'll understand it is not an error. It is your diseased thinking.I'll give you one example: many critics will say Qu'ran says the Earth was created in 8 days in Surah Fusillat. It does not. They have mistranslated the Arabic word to 'then.' If it says 'then' then it is a contradiction. But the correct translation was supposed to be "Moreover" or "Simultaneously". If you ask a scholar, they will explain it to you, and you'll come to know there is no contradiction. None. People will say Qu'ran has grammar errors (naudhibillallah). It does not. The ignorant do not know that all the Arabic grammar they will find in Arabic textbooks---all of it, is derived from the Qu'ran. Why? Because the Qu'ran is the most superior form of Arabic Grammar. it is the highest level--and still is, and will always be, until the Day of Judgment. So, it's like measuring against a ruler, or meter stick, and saying, "This Ruler is wrong." It's completely illogical. Qu'ran has no grammar mistakes. If you study Arabic, you'll come to know that the Qu'ran's grammar is at the divine level. Never will they be able to write anything like the Qu'ran. Never will they be able to change it. Never will they be able to find any error in it. Don't they realize that Allah says in the Qu'ran, that had it been from someone other than Allah, you would've found many contradictions. But you will find none. Then again, it makes no difference to Allah whether they believe or disbelieve. Allah does not need their prayers. He does not need them. Allah is self-sufficient. We need him. So they can disbelieve if they want, but they'll come to know who is greater in numbers, and who is few in numbers on the Day when they shall stand before the Almighty, and when they are given their records of what they used to do, and they will wish they were dust. They used to deny Allah, the One and Only God, and they used the existence of Hell, so they will taste the hellfire which they used to deny. You can respond to this if you want, but I will not respond. What message I needed to convey, I have done it. All I'm saying is stop being biased, open your eyes to the reality, and learn Islam, Qu'ran, and the hadiths with an open heart and mind, and you will come to know Allah exists. He is the one who created us, and to him we belong, and to him we shall return. Only when you see the Angel of Death, you disbelievers will find that it is too late, and you'll realize that God does exist. He is real. Salaam.
So where are this god? Hiding to see who belives in him or not? If he had exist why create all of us then only save those who belives in him? If he is god, why go to all this drama? Make no sence if you ask me. Its like making babies and then send some of them to live in pain rest of theire life and give love to some of them. If there was a god he should know that people belive what they see. So he must really hate what he has created. Strange if you ask me.
Anaxagoras (499-428 BC) seems to have been the first to discover that the moon shines only by reflected light: Anaxagoras also explained that solar eclipses occur when the moon moves between the earth and the sun.
What will you say about the rest of the things? And what proof do you have that he was the first person? Any archaeological proof? Quran was revealed 1400 years back and can be proven by carbon dating.
Yes , i just tried to google the hard copy of his work, or maybe his tombs or any evidence of this respected philopher of ancient world in greek was exist and really wrote a book abt this knowledge but havent succeded yet .. link please
Lol he is freaking stupid be talks shit the places and names of people he takes dont even exist.and he clearly dont understand how probability works he has failed his 8th grade maths i can assure u that
In the Holy Quran, God speaks about the stages of man's embryonic development, 1,400 years before modern day scientists 'discovered' important information on creation of man and his development: We created man from an extract of clay. Then We made him as a drop in a place of settlement, firmly fixed. Then We made the drop into an alaqah (leech, suspended thing, and blood clot), then We made the alaqah into a mudghah (chewed-like substance)... [Noble Quran 23:12-14] Literally the Arabic word alaqah has 3 meanings: leech suspended thing blood clot "In comparing a leech to the embryo at the alaqah stage, we find similarity between the two." [The Developing Human p.8]. "Also, the embryo as this stage obtains nourishment from the blood of the mother, similar to the leech which feeds on the blood of others." [Human Development as Described in Quran and Sunnah p.36]. Chase Stacks
The second meaning of the word alaqah is 'suspended thing'. The suspension of the embryo, during the alaqah stage, in the womb of the mother very appropriately fits this description. The third meaning of the word alaqah is 'blood clot'. We find that the external appearance of the embryo and its sacs during the alaqah stage is similar to that of a blood clot. This is due to the presence of relatively large amounts of blood present in the embryo during this stage. Also during this stage the blood in the embryo does not circulate until the end of the third week. So the embryo at this stage is like a clot of blood.
Here Mr Naik 1) The moon was discovered to reflect the Sun's light in early Greek history. A Greek philosopher named Anaxagoras (500 BCE to 428 BCE) claimed that the moon did not produce its own light. Rather, he believed that the moon was a reflection of the Sun's light. Anaxagoras proved this through his studies of lunar eclipses. 2) Around 350 BC, the great Aristotle declared that the Earth was a sphere (based on observations he made about which constellations you could see in the sky as you travelled further and further away from the equator) and during the next hundred years or so, Aristarchus and Eratosthenes actually measured the size
Ultimately he didn’t provide any proof that can scientifically prove God’s existence nor did he even have hard evidence at all. First off, for something to be scientific, it would have to follow the scientific method which nothing that he quoted or stated is even in relation to, and it also contradicts that title of this video. All these things that he quoted from his religion’s holy book had not even touched base with the scientific method. In addition, just because something is right, doesn’t mean that it was brought to that conclusion properly. Also you can’t conclude something as the doing a higher power just because a few thing were correct . . . In order to conclude something as the doing of an high power, you’d have to prove the existence of the high power in the first place. So that basically debunks his statement that “scientists aren’t disproving god... they’re adding to his existence”. Secondly, there were many occurrences in history where primitive people have have gotten information only accomplishable by today’s science, so just because your holy book states it, doesn’t mean that your God did it...
Don't be ignorant and open your eye's. Should like Dr. Zakir Nair said, what are the probabilities for all these things to be right, if they were not written by the creator himself (God). Try to look to things with an open mind. Because how can you ignore all this evidence. Try to search with an open mind.
@@cyrawestwood3006 I’m not ignoring evidence nor am I being closed minded, because like I said before, those few things that this man used in his holy book that were right about science does not simply point to god as a result. Especially since more ancient civilizations know information like that without modern technology. For example, the Dogon tribe in Africa... they knew many things about astronomy that was only accomplishable through modern science. Not to mention that these discoveries they made are exponentially more intricate than what the guy in the video was taking about. In addition, they didn’t have a holy book nor did they have a religion that followed gods. So all I’m trying to say is that; what he gave out as “scientific evidence for god” is not evidence for anything because he is looking at a simplified result.
@@absquatulation7701 In the Quran is the following written 40:81"And he shows you his signs. Now which of Allah's signs will you deny?" There are many more signs written in the Quran. You are not convinced by these things, we got many more written in the Quran. And all these signs in the Quran are true, proven by science. Like Dr Zakir Naik said. What are the probabilities that someone from the desert could have ''guessed'' them all right?
@@cyrawestwood3006 Once again, there were other civilizations that made all these discoveries way before this. Also the way Dr. Zakir Kaik, described probability was very flawed especially since he was leaving out variables and doesn’t even stay to true to mathematics and possible events. The most likely cases is that there was some sort of alternative method than science used over centuries to lead to that outcome (that would explain the ratio between the amount of things people got right back then compared to what they got wrong), because using the correct form of probability could lead you there. So it was more than just guessing... but it most likely wasn’t a god because like I said over and over again, that would be simplification.
@@absquatulation7701 I looked up on the Dogon tribe and scientist call the knowledge they had about astronomy and mathematic incredible and are sure that they did not discover or develop them by themselves, so where does it come from? Also how do we know that the Dogon tribe had this information available to them before it was written in the Quran? We as muslims know that god has send far more messengers and prophets than what is written in the Quran. Some are unknown to us. How can we say that that tribe didn't receive the information from a messenger that was send by god to that tribe. And lets say that did have this information before the Quran. How big is the chance that a man from the middle east would ever know about these people of have come in contact with these people. There is always a chance of error even if you would use the method that you claim. But there are no errors in the signs given by god. So what you say makes no sense. I think you think to simple. Let me ask you one question. Where does all this matter/substance we have on earth come from. If you know basic science, you know that nothing can exists out of it own. It is not possible. Btw thank you the example for the dogon tribe, very interesting tribe. You spoke about more tribes or civilizations, could you give more examples.
It does include the big bang it also says that beyond us is darkness talking about space where its black its also says that when your in the air flying your chest gets tighter referring to airplane journeys. And the Quran also talks about sky radiation explain that one please.
See Reason Why 13 Famous Scientists Converted To Islam And What They Found* #إنجليزي ، انظر لماذا 17 عالم مشهور اعتنقوا الاسلام ، وماذا وجدوا! 1)Keith L. Moore Professor Emeritus, Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Toronto. He was amazed by the accuracy of the statements made in the Quran in the 7th century. Statements about embryology. Before anyone knew anything about it. These statements in the Quran could not be based on scientific knowledge of the time so it must have come from God. 2) E. Marshall Johnson Professor and Chairman of the Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, and Director of the Daniel Baugh Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. He also talked about embryology in the Quran. He said that Prophet Muhammad must have got this info from some source and that he has no issues that it came from God. 3)T.V.N. Persaud Professor of Anatomy, and Professor of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. He said for a man to make such profound statements about science in the seventh century is amazing. He said it could not be mere chance. 4)Joe Leigh Simpson Professor and Chairman of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA. He said he sees no conflict between genetics and Islam. He said Islam could guide science. He said the knowledge in the Quran is from God. 5)Gerald C. Goeringer Professor and Co-ordinator of Medical Embryology in the Department of Cell Biology, School of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington DC, USA. He said the Koran described human development and commingling of the gametes through organogenesis. He said nothing in history has seen such a feat besides current day science. 6) Alfred Kroner Professor of the Department of Geosciences, University of Mainz, Germany. He talked about the origin of the universe and how it would be impossible for a man like Prophet Muhammad to know about this from his own mind. He said science today proves what the prophet said 1400 years ago. 7)Yushidi Kusan Director of the Tokyo Observatory, Tokyo, Japan. He talks about astronomy and using telescopes. He said that the Quran has true facts about astronomy. 8)Professor Armstrong Professor Armstrong works for NASA and is also Professor of Astronomy, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA. He was amazed by what the Quran says about astronomy and how the ancient writing of the Quran agrees with modern science today. 9)William Hay Professor of Oceanography, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA. He was very interested how this information in the Quran could have this science in it and that it must be from God. 10) Durja Rao Professor of Marine Geology teaching at King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. He said that the Quran could not be simple human knowledge and must be from a Supernatural Force. 11) Professor Siaveda Professor of Marine Geology, Japan. He said the Quran is almost unbelievable and a very remarkable book. 12) Tejatat Tejasen Chairman of the Department of Anatomy and is the former Dean of the faculty of Medicine, University of Chiang Mai, Chiang Mai, Thailand. He said all the facts of science in the Quran can be scientifically proven today. 13) Dr. Maurice Bucaille Born in 1920, former chief of the Surgical Clinic, University of Paris, has for a long time deeply interested in the correspondences between the teachings of the Holy Scriptures and modern secular knowledge. He said it is impossible to explain how a book produced at the time of prophet Muhammad could contain ideas that have only been discovered today. How could a man know these facts without the slightest of error. news-af.feednews.com/news/detail/f7fa9839105d4
According to Newton's 3rd law Every action has an equal opposite reaction Then If we are re actions Then who did action And you athiests believes that The action whatever happened is just co incident. You believe that. Because of that supernatural powerful thing this action like big bang happened But you don't believe that That much powerful thing also can think like us Go and read Quran In Quran 1400 yrs ago God said about embryology Whole big bang theory with in a small verses. How can a human have that much of knowledge that time without any adavanced instruments. You athiests peoples believe Because of that power whole universe formed But you denied that power is just a co incident. That power has no intelligence And just co incident . In my views that power has intelligence and that is God Almighty Because of this, Almighty sent many messengers on earth with Almighty's messages See in Quran *See Reason Why 13 Famous Scientists Converted To Islam And What They Found* #إنجليزي ، انظر لماذا 17 عالم مشهور اعتنقوا الاسلام ، وماذا وجدوا! 1)Keith L. Moore Professor Emeritus, Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Toronto. He was amazed by the accuracy of the statements made in the Quran in the 7th century. Statements about embryology. Before anyone knew anything about it. These statements in the Quran could not be based on scientific knowledge of the time so it must have come from God. 2) E. Marshall Johnson Professor and Chairman of the Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, and Director of the Daniel Baugh Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. He also talked about embryology in the Quran. He said that Prophet Muhammad must have got this info from some source and that he has no issues that it came from God. 3)T.V.N. Persaud Professor of Anatomy, and Professor of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. He said for a man to make such profound statements about science in the seventh century is amazing. He said it could not be mere chance. 4)Joe Leigh Simpson Professor and Chairman of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA. He said he sees no conflict between genetics and Islam. He said Islam could guide science. He said the knowledge in the Quran is from God. 5)Gerald C. Goeringer Professor and Co-ordinator of Medical Embryology in the Department of Cell Biology, School of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington DC, USA. He said the Koran described human development and commingling of the gametes through organogenesis. He said nothing in history has seen such a feat besides current day science. 6) Alfred Kroner Professor of the Department of Geosciences, University of Mainz, Germany. He talked about the origin of the universe and how it would be impossible for a man like Prophet Muhammad to know about this from his own mind. He said science today proves what the prophet said 1400 years ago. 7)Yushidi Kusan Director of the Tokyo Observatory, Tokyo, Japan. He talks about astronomy and using telescopes. He said that the Quran has true facts about astronomy. 8)Professor Armstrong Professor Armstrong works for NASA and is also Professor of Astronomy, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA. He was amazed by what the Quran says about astronomy and how the ancient writing of the Quran agrees with modern science today. 9)William Hay Professor of Oceanography, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA. He was very interested how this information in the Quran could have this science in it and that it must be from God. 10) Durja Rao Professor of Marine Geology teaching at King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. He said that the Quran could not be simple human knowledge and must be from a Supernatural Force. 11) Professor Siaveda Professor of Marine Geology, Japan. He said the Quran is almost unbelievable and a very remarkable book. 12) Tejatat Tejasen Chairman of the Department of Anatomy and is the former Dean of the faculty of Medicine, University of Chiang Mai, Chiang Mai, Thailand. He said all the facts of science in the Quran can be scientifically proven today. 13) Dr. Maurice Bucaille Born in 1920, former chief of the Surgical Clinic, University of Paris, has for a long time deeply interested in the correspondences between the teachings of the Holy Scriptures and modern secular knowledge. He said it is impossible to explain how a book produced at the time of prophet Muhammad could contain ideas that have only been discovered today. How could a man know these facts without the slightest of error. news-af.feednews.com/news/detail/f7fa9839105d469431fcbf089972ca4f?client=news
@@qwerty-vf5bv It's wonderfull that you cite newtons third law. It shows you have interest in science! I admire that. However, using this law only adds a new problem: If everything has a cause, then what was the cause of god? The answer, that he was always there, makes no sense to the third law. Quantum mechanics is challeging the idea that everything needs a cause. Fact is, that we don't know why we are here, why anything is here. There are theories, and one of them is a creator - always leaving the question open: who or what created the creator? I am not affraid of not knowing, to not have a definite answer. Claiming to have a definite answer, would be highly arrogant. Perhaps there is a creator, perhaps not. Perhaps everything is an accident, perhaps not. Not-knowing brings out the quest of science, the quest of proof. The Quran is a badly written book, just like every religious book. Any interpretation is open to debate, and anyone who interpretes it says he is right and everyone else is wrong. Therefore, so called holy books have no proof value to me. And to say that book was the first, for example, that the moon reflected light, is simply not true. I am happy that you have the certainty you seek in life. I do not wish to take it away from you. For me, I like facts and the curiousity that comes from not knowing where there are no facts yet. I wish you well.
Quran is not a book of science.. its a book of signs. We dont bring the holly book to the debate of science and degrade the holly book as a sceience book. .. taht so naive in my perspective We need to think and have a bit knowledge to see the signs. Scientists are people that see the sign of Allah every single day but they are not a seeker of the truth. They look but they refuse to see,, are they expected Allah will showed up according to their flavour of ideas or they imaginations (if they have any , i doubt iit) Allah is nothing alike any of His creatures ,, nothing can be compared to Him and He dont follow mens Rules or laws. Allah dont follow the physics laws because He s the one wno created it.. make sense to me. The evidence of Allah is every where , the atheist scientists denied it and cancel Allah from their books . Good luck then and dont forget ppl who brought knowledge and science as a light to the darkness of europe was moslem their knowledge was inspired by the quran amd those noble men were the people of faith And its really funny to find out in this so called modern days or post modern what ever flavor u would like to call it , their murids (students) become atheist .. hmm. Maybe because in the history we know that they stole the book of science artifact from baghdad.. there was no baraka, they didnt have ijaza to prcatice all of those knowledge, without baraka theres no hidaya .. so they are now become atheist wont realky suprised me Btw i couldnt find any hard copy of this greek man book aT least the picture of his book, scriptures or stones what ever .. i have googled it .. but havent found them yet Good luck then we all wait til, the moment the truth. We all gonna die and at last we will meet our hard evidence in person ..see u later
Scientific method is to fetch a conclusion from observations and experiments..... instead of imagining a conclusion before seeking evidence of its validity. There are multiple scientific inaccuracies in religious scriptures which reflect their iron age manmade origin.
Such as? Don't try to look intelligent and intelectual. People smarter than you, scientists who know more science than you concluded there is a God. What are your credentials?
@@ofdd1031 people like you crave for a master to make sense of your sufferings. You'll always follows other people, but not your reason because this is what you've surrendered for the vagaries of dogmatism.
@@ABCXYZ-hc5zw "people like me" have actually used the brain to impartially understand if there is any coherence in existence of God. And "people like me" and other people from the golden age of science, philosophy and so many areas have agreed that it is deeply stupid to think that all of this imperfectly perfect world is just a result of infinite randomness. That's just being blind and scared to acknowledge that there is Someone above us. And no, its not about suffering because yeah everyone suffers but everyone has happy koments too, and that is deeply incoherent as if I was afraid of suffering I wouldn't be following a religion where there are so many restrictions and it is harder than you folks who live just to live without any purpose. I can actually teach you if you want, but I guess you are too arrogant to acknowledge that "people like me" might be right. I genuinely apologise if I offended you by the way.
He is trying to twist the worlds of Quran to fit with the knowledge we have today to make it sound like the Quran was correct 1400 years ago. For example two words are being used in Quran to describe light one for the sun "siraj" and one for the moon "nur" which actually describes two types of light, one is brighter than the other, but he is twisting the meaning of those words to sound like one is own light and one is borrowed light. The Quran also says Allah has placed the sun the moon and the stars in the heaven or sky, would Allah not know that the sun is also a star? The word `nuran`(nūr) is the word used for the moon`s light and certainty it doesn`t mean reflected/derived/borrowed light as this liar guy is manipulating here.because same word `nūr` is used to describe light of Allah in Quran in 5:15,9:32, "siraj" is used for sun and it's also used to describe for Muhammad, so he means to say Muhammad has his own light and god has borrowed light?, That's his own theory, not the words of Quran. And again, many greek scientists had the same knowledge about the earth during those times. The things he described about embryology anatomy and botany, nothing is clear in Quran. They are all interpretations being made from scholars later on after knowing the established facts of science. Even if you think all the words of Quran are correct, how dies it prove that it's form God? Newton was right about all his theories of gravity, does it mean it was a revelation from god too? He also says Darwin's evolution theory is "Just a theory" and not mentioned in the Quran so it must be false, then according to him, Quantum theory, and string theory are also not correct, and just theories because they are not mentioned in the Quran, does it make any sense?
Hellsong89 A lot of success of Islam is based on fear. They are threatened with the fear of hell, eternal torture and death for apostate. They are also tempted with eternal paradise after death, and lots of booty
He uses the word borrowed light to explain it fool - not to put it directly He called it the sun (not the star) Because a humans call it the sun "Hey our star is rising I like the star set" I don't think so Stop manipulating his words
"It is He Who created the night and the day, and the sun and the moon. They swim along, each in an orbit. " (The Qur'an, 21:33) It is simple observation to see the sun set on one side and then rise on another and think it is going around you thus orbiting, that doesn't take any extra advanced scientific knowledge to know that. And the sun is NOT orbiting only the earth is doing the orbiting which proves even further that it is based on simple observation and nothing more. If the Qur'anor or Bible were scientifically accurate, how did they get evolution so wrong? "He has created the Heavens and the Earth for Truth. He wraps the night up in the day, and wraps the day up in the night." (The Qur'an, 39:5) when you stand and turn in a circle and look at the horizon it appears to be round so a common expression in those time was the "round of the earth" and you can definitely wrap something around an object that has a flat surface. Nothing in that verse proofs they had any advances scientific knowledge. "Glory be to Him Who created all the pairs: from what the earth produces and from themselves and from things unknown to them." (The Qur'an, 37:36) That verse is incredibly vague and could mean thousands of different things depending on what's convenient to your world view. The most obvious meaning is that pars are male and female and are produced by whats in the world and themselves (sex and calories) and things unknown are whatever magic dust people thought god used at that time. It wouldn't make sense to refer to subatomic particles, if he made all positive/negative particles from the earth and from themselves then what made the earth and themselves if there were no subatomic particles before then?
Tell me when the scientists found that baby is born by sperm? Tell me Tell me 100 years ago or 200 years ago or 300 years ago But it is written in Quran 1400 years ago Tell me how?
@@mohamedmoinudeen2206 exactly brother, most people who comment that this is not correct, Allah (SWT) doesn't want them to believe, so it's better if those who have been guided not argue with them..........as there are signs right in front of them, but they don't see them!
Search jason search , what do you have to lose just pick a coran read it and if you got questions ask zakir or yousef estes i think he is in usa right now , you've got nothing to lose and nobody to convince .
@@humzermuneer6030 That makes no sense. Some of the worst atrocities were commited with religious intent/ backing. Throughout history we have seen people massacred for not converting to new faiths from invading forces. The native Americans, Africans and even Asians and Aboriginals all died in 'animalistic' ways due to religion. When you have no religion, you cant convert anyone. Simple as that.
lllllllllolol yep these fanatic religious idiots think the longer the beard the more devout muslim , greek orthodox , jew orthodox etc. they are and will be revered as holy men when in fact their long religious beard is nothing more than the direct result of how brainwashed they are
@@jojojojo5353 yes but I want to ask you that what happens when a Sikh has a beard? Isn't he the same orthodox about which you are talking for Muslims?? I want to ask you that what happens when your famous Hindu pandits have beards?? Isn't it the same orthodox for which u are blaming Muslims??? So if it is so then hold ur tongue or otherwise someday ur own pandits will rip it off...
I have so many problems, I feel depressed, no one likes me I cant talk well to people, am not good at doing daily tasks, is it all because I am an atheist?
Religious people who believe in God also have problems...just look at palestine people innocents getting killed for no reason...now is it all because they r NOT atheist?..no...see life is a test for every human being
Quran Big bang (21 : 30) Expansion of the Universe (51:47) Big crunch (21:104) Water come from sky (space) (23 : 18) Allah organisms are made out of water (21 : 30) Black Holes (56 : 75) Iron is from Space (57 : 25) There is darkness in the depths of the sea.(24:40) Earth is orbiting on its axis (Surah Al-Zumar, Ayat : 5) Sun is moving in orbit (i.e around Sagittarius A*) (21:33) Moon is moving in orbit (21:33) Mountains are like Stakes (78:6-7) Female bees make honey (16:68,69) Pain Receptors in skin (4:56) Frontal Lobe (96:15-16) The Sky's protection (21:32) There is darkness in the depths of the sea.(24:40) Internal Waves in the Oceans (24:40) The meeting of two different seas (55:19-20) Apart from these there are many other scientifically proven verses. How could an illiterate man in the desert 1400 years ago know all this? Think...
@@sahilkumar-vq6hu Obviously! When a person is disconnected to His Creator then at some point in his life he feels empty & depressed. We have body & soul. The soul is in need of the Creator. And the body only gets activated when soul enters the body, the consciousness in the brain & conscience in the heart comes from the soul. Just try to get a connection with the Creator who is All-knowing, All-Aware, All-Hearing, All-Seeing, All Powerful, All-Authoritative, The Creator of all Power, The Eternal Possessor of Sovereignty and yet Most Kind, Most Merciful of those who show Mercy, Most Forebearing, Most Patient, Most Loving.
The answer given by Zakir shows only his own sad scientific illiteracy and poor understanding of actual scientific methods. His comments are filled to the brim with logical leaps the size of mountains and meaningless analogies. I can give you another answer on who would be the first to understand this imaginary object Zakir talks about: The first person who could explain to you how it works would be the first scholar who observed it and conducted experiments into its behaviour and functionality, not necessarily the creator of the object (a meteorite is a flying object for example that has never been explained to us by its creator - because its "creator" doesn't have any agency, rather the first to explain how a meteorite works was the first person who observed and understood it - and no, false explanations like "it was send by god", who are not based on reason do not count as science or evidence for the existence of god). Also the theory of probability is falsely presented here. Science is not just wild-gessing anything out of a set of alternatives. The probability that the earth is flat or hexagonal is not equal to the probability that it's a sphere - despite Zakir treating both alternatives as equally probable. The latter is of course vastly more probable because our observations heavely suggest it and it makes sense considering other theories of the universe (notice however, that Zakir doesn't mention where THESE things are said in the Quran, if i have the opportunity to read them i am extremly sure that they will turn out to be as absurd as everything else that comes out of his mouth) The Quran does not mention the big bang theory with one word. In -Surah Anbiya Ch. 21: V. 30- it merely says that those who disbelieve might have forgotten that heaven and earth have once been one entity. To say that this references the explosion of a singularity and the following cosmic expansion is as absurd as saying the Bible references darwins theory of evolution when it says, that the animals of the sea have gone on land and vice versa in the book of wisdom, it merely means that the people of ancient times were not morons but actually observed what was going on around them and had philosophical thoughts which they wrote down in the Quran, the Bible and other works. The notion that living things were created out of water is already mentioned by ancient philosophers around 800 B.C. and does not originate from the Quran (as barely anything does). I do not expect any believer to have read until this point but if you did: May science and progress lead to your enlightenment! - because listening to this guy surely won't.
The amount of arrogance we humans show just being able to explain a very insignificant amount of the world around us in other words "Science", is truly astonishing. May Allah help us to overcome such arrogance.
The only thing he hypothetically proves is that the author of the Quran was educated in the science of the time, in case all of these "hundreds" of scientific passages he mentions are even in it. But his theory of probability amounts to imagining everything on this planet as a Laplacian experiment and pretending that means anything. You can do the exact same procedure with any advanced maths book by editing out the citations, asking some random passerby if they know the author of any of the 150 theorems present in it and going "Oh, you don't know any? Well, the probability that it's all right is (0.5)^150. Which is small, so god must have written it." Absolutely intellectually disingenuous and the worst part about it is that people eat this shit up. Good on you for calling it out, as it should be.
@@naikyou But historical evidence proves Prophet Mohammed (SM) never had any education on science or history. Nor he was scholars to any Christian scriptures or Egyptian culture. In fact he couldn't read and write. So this argument doesn't stand. Besides Quran contains information about the old kingdom of Egypt which was lost to the knowledge of the people for thousands of years and only recently discovered by archeologist. So that's also an important point to consider.
@@notyou7421 Hello Brother Quran 2:3-5 who believe in the unseen, establish prayer, and donate from what We have provided for them, and who believe in what has been revealed to you ˹O Prophet˺1 and what was revealed before you, and have sure faith in the Hereafter. It is they who are ˹truly˺ guided by their Lord, and it is they who will be successful
Without getting into whether or not the logic was right, the shape of the earth was known long before the Quran was written, in Ancient Greece. Moreover, in a way, we are made of a combination of hundreds of "materials" or compounds, so saying that the body is literally water is like saying all the water on the earth is sea water, or that all the air we breathe is nitrogen. I am pretty sure humankind already knew about bodies having water at that point, but was not able to find when exactly this discovery was made.
You're pretty Sure? Wow congrats you invented Time machine Sale Desert ka logho ka pash itna information kaisa aya Thoda soch la gandu Try Mordern Science with Hinduism you'll find it Hinduism kitna galta hai (old scripture) toh bhul hi jao
@@evileye7803 Expected some ranting on this as well. First one, I verified. Greeks had indeed discovered the earth was round using the concept of varying shadow lengths. In fact they also estimated the circumference of the earth to within a thousand kilometres. Second one seems logical, considering that humans would have probably known that several mammals in the surroundings have high water content. You don't need to be some extraordinary scientist to see that if animals consume water and their bodies generate steam on heating, and sweat, that their bodies also naturally contain water. Also, my beliefs shouldn't matter to this discussion because I am discussing solely about historical facts.
@@rushilkaul Greeks didn't even able to discover that Earth is round not flat lol It discovered in 1500 century Leave 1400 years you can't even able to imagine that water is the reason behind life 500 years ago Now you can assume anything & believe that Quran is the only Holy Book where every single Scientific Reference are correct Quran is Book of SIGN not Science If ALLAH wanted to give every detail then that book gonna be higher than Burj Khalifa
@@evileye7803 Eratosthanes was a Greek mathematician who discovered the circumference of the earth using flag poles in Alexandria around 2000 years ago: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eratosthenes Many of these peices of information were either already known peices of information among scholars in that time, or are explained very vaguely in the Quran (humans being made of water is definitely not a clear scientific finding). Even if these were all well explained, highly accurate peices of information, it would only work in a cumulative case towards proof of Allah, rather than proof on it's own. All it would prove on it's own is that either the old Islamic scholars were privy to more information than we thought, or that the Quran was modified later on to fit with new information.
Quran does NOT say that moonlight is reflected light. "Noor" or "Munir" only means light/shine/radiance not derived/borrowed/reflected light. Kindly see for yourself in any dictionary. The earlier translations such as Pickthall's nowhere mention that moonlight is a reflection. Only the Sahih International translation is nowadays adding the word "derived light" to forcefully reconcile the Quran with science. Kindly go to quran.com to check this as translations from different authors are available there.
@@SMShah-nc6rv Kindly provide me a link to an online English to Arabic dictionary which translates "Munir" to "illuminated by light". I suspect you are making up the translation.
@@SMShah-nc6rv The word "Munir" gets translated to "lightsome", "shiny", "gorgeous", "luminous" in Google Translate but there is no mention of "reflected/reflection". Went to quran.com. Various translations of ch 25 : v 61 are there but none of them mention moonlight as a reflection: DR. GHALI Supremely Blessed is He Who has made in the heaven constellations, and He has made therein a luminary and an enlightening moon. MUHSIN KHAN Blessed be He Who has placed in the heaven big stars, and has placed therein a great lamp (sun), and a moon giving light. PICKTHALL Blessed be He Who hath placed in the heaven mansions of the stars, and hath placed therein a great lamp and a moon giving light! SAHIH INTERNATIONAL Blessed is He who has placed in the sky great stars and placed therein a [burning] lamp and luminous moon. YUSUF ALI Blessed is He Who made constellations in the skies, and placed therein a Lamp and a Moon giving light. MUFTI TAQI USMANI Glorious is the One who made stellar formations in the sky, and placed therein a lamp (i.e. the sun) and a bright moon. ABUL ALA MAUDUDI (WITH TAFSIR) Most blessed is He Who set a constellation in the heavens, and placed in it a great lamp and a shining moon. DR. MUSTAFA KHATTAB Blessed is the One Who has placed constellations in the sky, as well as a radiant lamp and a luminous moon.
@@SMShah-nc6rv All what you have written shows confirmation bias and wishful interpretation. The sun and the moon LOOK/APPEAR different, and have different properties (sunlight is accompanied by heat but not moonlight in comparison) that is why different words have been used to describe them. If Allah swt created the whole world, why could they not put a single extra word while revealing the verse which specifically meant "reflected" in the Arabic language (which is "Aineikas")? It is people like you and Zakir Naik who are "forcefully inserting" words which are not there. Translators MUST NOT change the translations of the verses because that would be DISHONESTY. None of the Arabic words in the verse means reflected so the translation must not mention it otherwise that would be a CLEAR LIE. Stars are luminous too but the light they emit is their own. The verse which "seems" like it is describing Big Bang is actually repeating mythologies from Bible and previous cultures and hence is not the first one to describe creation in such a way before the scientific era👇 th-cam.com/video/mTsJwnBTPkQ/w-d-xo.html
@@SMShah-nc6rv You are dishonestly inserting the word "reflected" which is not in the verse. You did not watch the video for which I gave you the link. So lemme write it here. Apart from Bible, numerous cultures thought that the sky and the Earth were joined: The Greeks who said in the beginning there was only water (the God Oceanus), and then Eurynome separated the sky from the sea by dancing on the waves of Oceanus. The Dhammai of India, The Diegenos of California - Earth and heaven had to be separated because no room for growth in the darkness otherwise. The Romans - separation of heaven and earth by a natural force - a Godin Ancient Greece Kronos (Time) castrated his father and separated heaven and earth, similarly with the Continental Celts. Creation myth of the Krachi of Africa- the God of heaven rests firmly on Earth and human offspring are nearly smothered, and by lots of squirming father is sent up higher and higher. Maori and other Polynesian people said that the sky father and earth mother clung so tightly that their children had no choice but to force them apart. The Snohomish of North Western Africa - people banging their heads against the sky so heaven and earth separated. In Mongolia, Udan separates heaven and earth with 99 golden columns. Vietnam giant Khong raises the sky from the earth with his head. Mesoamerica the Mayan feathered serpent and the God Tepeu use their immense power to separate heaven and earth. Many more such myths in "Creation Myths of the World" by David Adams Leeming. abdullahsameer.com/blog/creation-myths-of-the-world/
SubhanAllah what a learned man he is! If only all of us even had the 5pc of wisdom he does, the world would be such a beautiful place to live in! From Dongri, Mumbai, India.💜
Most verses what he said isn't there in the Quran, there's a verse where I found about heaven and earth but this guy said it's the big bang theory Hard to believe any scholar
No bro "heaven" means "sky" in Arabic(there are many meaning of it) you can check several verses where heaven means Sky. I think you will be confused because of arabic words
The question was NOT answered. WHAT was stated was CLAIMS for evidence, NOT PROOF. WHERE was the Scripture Scientific ANALYSIS (Formula) shown the Scripture Scientific EXAMPLE (Formula) shown the Scripture Scientific PROOF for the EXAMPLE (Formula) shown Although being correct about ONLY the creator is able to provide understanding to his creation. A servant to the creator would understand the DIFFERENCE between a CLAIM based off of PHILOSOPHY percentages and a Fact based on ABSOLUTE PROOF.
His answer was entertaining. Let me give you another answer to prove God does exist. Despite being a muslim, the scope of my answer will remain within the existence of God and that a God is needed for everything to exist. Accepting Allah later as the God is something one can come to know by the miracles of the Holy Quran and the Doctor mentioned. There are several things science believes. 1 That time had a start and maybe the universe is say at its 14.5 Billionth year right now and that in the begining during the big bang, only a few seconds had passed... that is time had a start! Just like how we start a stop watch and it was once at 0. 2 When too much mass gathers in one place (like a Blackhole), Time is essentially 0 inside that area.. as in Time gets stopped and no process can occur. 3 The human mind is limitless. Then answer me this... if the universe really was a gaint lump of mass even more concentrated and more in mass than the biggest blackholes... then Time definitely had to be 0 upon it.... as in its stuck! If time is stuck... how does a process (Big Bang) even occur? And who put all that unbelievable amount of mass and gave that mass space to be in? The only answer to a process starting is... you need a Higher Being not Himself bound to Time space or that mass to trigger a process that removes the said mass from its stuck 0 Time state and allow a big bang to occur for the formation of the universe. In other words, Time itself is also a creation to which the Creator is not bound. Then they usually ask you... but who created God? How did God come to be? This where the 3rd point "humans have limitless brains" being proven false comes into equation. Our brains are not limitless. We can think of many many things but there is a big limitation on our brain... we can think only with regards to the physical limitations of our universe... which includes Time/Space/Mass/Energy/Physical laws etc. We cannot imagine how a Being like God can work without Time and Space and neither can we imagine how He Can exists without Time and Space nor imagine his form. Since He is not bound to time, the entire question "When did God start existing OR who was before Him' become null and void as these questions are dependant on taking time into account to which God is not bound. As a result, we cannot imagine what God is like or how He was already there, but we do come to the conclusion that you needed an outside factor like God to start the ignition of the universe's engine in the beginning.
@@jojojojo5353 Because we are so weak a mere blackhole brought closer to earth will mean our end. You want a God greater than the universe to manifest Himself on the universe? Be thankful He isn't doing so otherwise everything would end instantly. Also, while this isn't my domain to speak of as I don't know the complete truth but He May not be hiding, if you've read my post above and grabbed the context, based on that He May Be present everywhere but we cannot perceive Him because perceiving Him is beyond the limits of this universe and our limited brain.
@@ultrapowerlevel excuses exsuses, with all the gods humans have created in history your excuses for your god not making its presence known to ALL hold no water :)
@@jojojojo5353 So you want God to show Himself to you and show you heaven and hell and then say, "you follow me and I will make you enter heaven" And then you do? You make no sense. He has given you intellect, please make use of it.
By what basis would you know that the word you know in Arabic means exactly what it meant when it was written? Your thoughts on the word itself would differ from the meaning of the author.
Because the language was not forgotten, it's still used the same way, same dictionary, millions of people are using it and if you ask an arabic professore (who teaches arabic!) he would know.
In a mothe's womb were two babies.One asked the other: "Do you believe in life after delivery?"The other replied,"why,ofcourse.There has to be somthing after delivery.Maybe we are here to prepare ourselves for what we will be later." "Nonsense", said the first. "There is no life after delivery.What kind of life would that be?" The second said, "I don't know,but there will be more light than here.Maybe we will walk with our legs and eat with our mouths.Maybe we will have other senses that we can't understand now." The first replied, "that is absurd.Walking is impossible.And eating with our mouths?Ridiculous! The umbilical cord supplies nutrition and everything we need.But the umbilical cord is so short.Life after delivery is to be logically exculded." The second insisted, "Well I think there is something and maybe it's different than it is here.Maybe we won't need this physical cord anymore." The first replied "Nonsense".And moreover,if there is life,then why has no one ever come back from there?Delivery is the end of life,and in the after-delivery, there is nothing but darkness and silence and oblivion.It takes us no where." "Well I don't know,said the second, but certain we will meet mother and she will take care of us." "The first replied "Mother"?You actually believe in Mother?That's laughable.If mother exists then where is she now?" The second replied, "she is all around us.We are surrounded by her.Without Her,this world would not and could not exist." Said the first, "well I don't see her,so it is only logical that she doesn't exist." To which the second replied,"Sometimes,when you are in silence and you focus and listen,you can perceive Her presence and you can listen Her loving voice,calling down from above." Maybe this was one of the best explanations of the concept of GOD
He claims the Koran 21:30 has anything to do with the big bang, but it mentions earth. No planets existed until billions of years after the big bang. Epic fail.
Maurog well that what happen when you are too dumb to even learn a language art, earth and sky it doesnt really that it is earth or it is sky, it means that a resources of a young earth use to unite to all thing in universe, witch is in big bang, epic fail and you are dumb really
So while listening to this at the very start i felt something horribly wrong with his reasoning. He said if he met an atheist he would congratulate him. To this I thought "hmm okay, but why?" Then he said he would congratulate the atheist because he left his false gods and is closer to making shahadah... REALLY? He doesn't accept the fact that there are atheists from ISLAMIC backgrounds as well? Like people who reject the idea of God despite their parents being religious and muslim? Would he congratulate such an atheist? Is that sort of atheist closer to making shahadah? This is certainly not the first time I've heard him be ignorant. I wish he would hear the criticism of him in order to improve his speeches and better himself in his reasoning.
Darken this isn’t post hoc rationalization. He never claimed that the Quran is the reason why the moon reflects light or why the sun moves. Post hoc rationalization is when you reason that since an event took place before another, that it caused the other event. The Quran is clear in what it says. The language it was written in is the same language it is studied in today
@@shaggygaming4612 To get to jannah. I'm doing it for the one who created me. And you and the whole universe. Btw who insane would do bad things ? Like are you really against my good deeds ?
According to Newton's 3rd law Every action has an equal opposite reaction Then If we are re actions Then who did action And you athiests believes that The action whatever happened is just co incident. You believe that. Because of that supernatural powerful thing this action like big bang happened But you don't believe that That much powerful thing also can think like us Go and read Quran In Quran 1400 yrs ago God said about embryology Whole big bang theory with in a small verses. How can a human have that much of knowledge that time without any adavanced instruments. You athiests peoples believe Because of that power whole universe formed But you denied that power is just a co incident. That power has no intelligence And just co incident . In my views that power has intelligence and that is God Almighty Because of this, Almighty sent many messengers on earth with Almighty's messages See in Quran *See Reason Why 13 Famous Scientists Converted To Islam And What They Found* #إنجليزي ، انظر لماذا 17 عالم مشهور اعتنقوا الاسلام ، وماذا وجدوا! 1)Keith L. Moore Professor Emeritus, Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Toronto. He was amazed by the accuracy of the statements made in the Quran in the 7th century. Statements about embryology. Before anyone knew anything about it. These statements in the Quran could not be based on scientific knowledge of the time so it must have come from God. 2) E. Marshall Johnson Professor and Chairman of the Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, and Director of the Daniel Baugh Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. He also talked about embryology in the Quran. He said that Prophet Muhammad must have got this info from some source and that he has no issues that it came from God. 3)T.V.N. Persaud Professor of Anatomy, and Professor of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. He said for a man to make such profound statements about science in the seventh century is amazing. He said it could not be mere chance. 4)Joe Leigh Simpson Professor and Chairman of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA. He said he sees no conflict between genetics and Islam. He said Islam could guide science. He said the knowledge in the Quran is from God. 5)Gerald C. Goeringer Professor and Co-ordinator of Medical Embryology in the Department of Cell Biology, School of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington DC, USA. He said the Koran described human development and commingling of the gametes through organogenesis. He said nothing in history has seen such a feat besides current day science. 6) Alfred Kroner Professor of the Department of Geosciences, University of Mainz, Germany. He talked about the origin of the universe and how it would be impossible for a man like Prophet Muhammad to know about this from his own mind. He said science today proves what the prophet said 1400 years ago. 7)Yushidi Kusan Director of the Tokyo Observatory, Tokyo, Japan. He talks about astronomy and using telescopes. He said that the Quran has true facts about astronomy. 8)Professor Armstrong Professor Armstrong works for NASA and is also Professor of Astronomy, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA. He was amazed by what the Quran says about astronomy and how the ancient writing of the Quran agrees with modern science today. 9)William Hay Professor of Oceanography, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA. He was very interested how this information in the Quran could have this science in it and that it must be from God. 10) Durja Rao Professor of Marine Geology teaching at King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. He said that the Quran could not be simple human knowledge and must be from a Supernatural Force. 11) Professor Siaveda Professor of Marine Geology, Japan. He said the Quran is almost unbelievable and a very remarkable book. 12) Tejatat Tejasen Chairman of the Department of Anatomy and is the former Dean of the faculty of Medicine, University of Chiang Mai, Chiang Mai, Thailand. He said all the facts of science in the Quran can be scientifically proven today. 13) Dr. Maurice Bucaille Born in 1920, former chief of the Surgical Clinic, University of Paris, has for a long time deeply interested in the correspondences between the teachings of the Holy Scriptures and modern secular knowledge. He said it is impossible to explain how a book produced at the time of prophet Muhammad could contain ideas that have only been discovered today. How could a man know these facts without the slightest of error. news-af.feednews.com/news/detail/f7fa9839105d469431fcbf089972ca4f?client=news
Yeah Prophet Muhammad s.a.w got first position in most influential person in the world history ranking by Michael h.hart Because of Prophet Muhammad s.a.w teachings And in this cruel world there's no place for humanity So it's difficult to live like a Muslims But better than others Also Some black sheeps means Wrong followers of islam Like isis and others are making there own rules. And after researching many people's are accepting Islam. Because they know isis is wrong. And thats why Fastest-growing religion in America is Islam. Respect to Muslims of All over the world And Aslamualaikum.
See Reason Why 13 Famous Scientists Converted To Islam And What They Found* #إنجليزي ، انظر لماذا 17 عالم مشهور اعتنقوا الاسلام ، وماذا وجدوا! 1)Keith L. Moore Professor Emeritus, Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Toronto. He was amazed by the accuracy of the statements made in the Quran in the 7th century. Statements about embryology. Before anyone knew anything about it. These statements in the Quran could not be based on scientific knowledge of the time so it must have come from God. 2) E. Marshall Johnson Professor and Chairman of the Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, and Director of the Daniel Baugh Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. He also talked about embryology in the Quran. He said that Prophet Muhammad must have got this info from some source and that he has no issues that it came from God. 3)T.V.N. Persaud Professor of Anatomy, and Professor of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. He said for a man to make such profound statements about science in the seventh century is amazing. He said it could not be mere chance. 4)Joe Leigh Simpson Professor and Chairman of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA. He said he sees no conflict between genetics and Islam. He said Islam could guide science. He said the knowledge in the Quran is from God. 5)Gerald C. Goeringer Professor and Co-ordinator of Medical Embryology in the Department of Cell Biology, School of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington DC, USA. He said the Koran described human development and commingling of the gametes through organogenesis. He said nothing in history has seen such a feat besides current day science. 6) Alfred Kroner Professor of the Department of Geosciences, University of Mainz, Germany. He talked about the origin of the universe and how it would be impossible for a man like Prophet Muhammad to know about this from his own mind. He said science today proves what the prophet said 1400 years ago. 7)Yushidi Kusan Director of the Tokyo Observatory, Tokyo, Japan. He talks about astronomy and using telescopes. He said that the Quran has true facts about astronomy. 8)Professor Armstrong Professor Armstrong works for NASA and is also Professor of Astronomy, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA. He was amazed by what the Quran says about astronomy and how the ancient writing of the Quran agrees with modern science today. 9)William Hay Professor of Oceanography, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA. He was very interested how this information in the Quran could have this science in it and that it must be from God. 10) Durja Rao Professor of Marine Geology teaching at King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. He said that the Quran could not be simple human knowledge and must be from a Supernatural Force. 11) Professor Siaveda Professor of Marine Geology, Japan. He said the Quran is almost unbelievable and a very remarkable book. 12) Tejatat Tejasen Chairman of the Department of Anatomy and is the former Dean of the faculty of Medicine, University of Chiang Mai, Chiang Mai, Thailand. He said all the facts of science in the Quran can be scientifically proven today. 13) Dr. Maurice Bucaille Born in 1920, former chief of the Surgical Clinic, University of Paris, has for a long time deeply interested in the correspondences between the teachings of the Holy Scriptures and modern secular knowledge. He said it is impossible to explain how a book produced at the time of prophet Muhammad could contain ideas that have only been discovered today. How could a man know these facts without the slightest of error. news-af.feednews.com/news/detail/f7fa9839105d4
assalamualaikum I miss Zakir's official debate because I have never seen it. Where all speakers sit as equals as moderated guided speakers. There are 3 videos of the formal zakir debate but zakir loses and is confused. During this time I saw zakir only doing lectures interspersed with questions and answers. Zakir as a speaker and other people ask. It means that Zakir controls the debate stage
I am a Muslim; I watched this video to find the answers; and to my disappointment, I could not find it. The reason: this is not scientific proof for those not believing in the Quran is the Book of GOD, let alone its scientific miracales, for there are some philosophers before BC, for instance, Anaxagoras (499-428 BC) who talked about the moon's light and sun rotation, and these references are most of the time used in debates in western educational institutions. No offense. May Allah guide us. Ameen.
I'm an Agnostic, I've read three translations of quran by renowned scholars and I most certainly disagree with him on all points. First of all several things that he has mentioned are not described in quran as he says. He either uses his own Arabic dictionary or extrapolation and misrepresentation of actual words of quran. Secondly, If we assume for a minute that its all true though its not, most of the things that he mentions existed in Indian subcontinent(interestingly the country we both are from) more than 1000-2500 years before it was mentioned in quran like Aryabhata's book Aryabhatiya, Arya-sidhanta and one book which was translated in Arabic Al ntf or Al-nanf similarly things related to medical science and physiology can be found in Charaka Samhita, Sushruta Samhita, and Atharva veda, the same goes for metallurgy, natural science and these texts are written by scholars of ancient times of course they have discrepancy but since it was not word of god so its fine. Now if I take his words seriously then I need to start following/praying to every one of them since unlike quran which offers vague description these books provides exact description and are at least twice as old. Now let me point out how Mohammed and his follower may have known about these stuffs. First of all Mohammed was illiterate so most of his things related to science will be based on hearsay and thus is supposed to be vague and inaccurate which is what quran really is when it comes to science. Now, there has always been a continuous relationship/interaction between middle east and Indian subcontinent in ancient times via trade, visits and wars/invasions which was a potential source of all the hearsay also, several texts had been translated in Arabic by scholars of ancient times. I would say this is more likely the reason for vague and incorrect things in quran related to science than assuming it was message of Allah the almighty who made deliberate mistakes while giving the message. Please read the history of the place you are born before spouting bullshit. By the way I'll have a doctor degree pretty soon though mine is not from bachelor but PhD so your stupid and childish arguments whether its related to science or spirituality doesn't impress me. Further more the root cause of vagueness of quran seems very apparent when you talk about theories like big bang or evolution since it seems you go by the hearsay as well and describe bullshit instead of actual thing. You are just good at remembering surah and ayat numbers sometime content as well but either you haven't read actual science or can't comprehend or remember it.
It is very important that we read the earliest translations because they give the unbiased and true view of the Koran. People like Zakir Naik are just stealing from the west and their discovery and manipulating the Koran and Arabic in an attempt to convert people.. The global oil prices are crashing, hopefully we can say good bye to oil soon and say hello to renewable clean energy, then those Arabic nations can drink their oil.
Look man, the only book I found personally (and all Muslims say) which is exactly the same as before in its original text is Quran. I can challenge you that you won't ever find a single word mistake or even letter mistake in the Quran, and there are billions of Arabic Quran in the world and non of them is different from the other. Even the copyright machines could make a mistake while making thousands of Quran just like they do in other makings, but they didn't do in the time of Quran. This is my challenge :)
AbdulRahim Siddiqui It seems your previous comment isn't here but it shows on google notification. Anyways I personally do not care much about what it says about believer or nonbeliever except when some extremists say Quran is absolute word of god and everything should be taken literally which sometime also suggests to kill those who reject the invite from Islam. I'm more concerned with people's claim about science in Quran cause I do not personally see it the way a devout sees it and so everything is open to constructive criticism. I'm sorry and no offence to you but as I see it, you may have comprehensive knowledge of quran but you do not have comprehensive knowledge about physics, evolution, astrophysics and other related branches of science and thus all this time you have been forwarding me hearsay. I apologize my comment may seem rude but I mean no disrespect just that this particular conversation about existence of god will yield nothing. We can converse in a way where you can tell me about Quran and I can tell about science but I'm pretty sure it will not prove existence of god in any way.
Non taken :) In fact, that gives me an idea. How about this, find a video or someone's criticism on a quranic verse about science who found an error in it, then find an opinion of scholars about the same verse (what it's actually saying). If the opinion is covering the criticism then it means the criticism is false and scholars are telling the truth. If the criticism has more weight than opinion, then tell me about that error too. How is it Mr. Satish? :)
i am certain others have comments. Atheism is NOT a belief, simply a statement that the time to believe in a god, is when there is sufficient evidence. that is all. Stop the straw man arguments. Is this not more honest that declaring "god did it". Secondly stop with false equivalences... learn how to think critically. If you make any claim that "god did it", then you need to prove a god exist first.
@@cyrawestwood3006 I did not make that claim (ie that a god does not exist). Please reread my comment. I am completely neutral; until there is evidence for a god i will not believe and neither do i deny its existence. I doubt you are "truly interested" otherwise you would have simply read my message/ The rational position is not to presuppose a god exists and then use confirmation bias to prove it. This is not how reasoning works. Follow the evidence. i could very well say that goblins on Mars are speaking to me and instructing me to hate all people with the initials CW. It is not for YOU to disprove that goblins exist, is it ? I made the claim, burden is on me. Now i would hope you would respond to me with "prove goblins exists, giving verifiable evidence and not quotes form ancient texts or metaphysics". Do you agree ? Until there is evidence of any supernatural being the correct response to something we do not understand is "I do not know", right ? It is NOT to claim a god did it (because you FIRST need to prove god exists). It really not a difficult point to grasp and rational (otherwise you must believe in my claim of goblins without evidence). for the religious, and even me, it is a scary position to say "i do not know", because of the overwhelming urge for humans to know things. Hope this helps.
@@tariq_sharif Maybe I have understood it wrong. But I was sincere when I said that I am truly interested. But you say that you won't believe in god until you have prove. How much prove do you need? Just look at all the prove given in the Quran and you still reject it? You are not any different than the people in the times of the prophets who rejected god. They would see miracles with their own eyes and they would reject it, calling it magic. There are signs in the Quran and you reject it. Do you truly believe you are unbiased to what is written in the Quran. "for the religious, and even me, it is a scary position to say "i do not know", because of the overwhelming urge for humans to know things." I agree with you, we humans are very curious and we like to know everything. But one thing we all agree on is that we won't receive all the answers to our questions in this life. That is the sad truth. But just because don't have answers to ALL our questions. There are enough signs that push us in the right direction.
What is not scientific about what Dr. Zakir Naik has said. You must know that the quran is not a book of science but a book of signs. So how are you going to reject these signs. I am 100% sure god exists, lets say 1000% sure. How sure are you and ask yourself and be honest, where is your proof.
@@cyrawestwood3006 so if your child had cancer and you could only choose either modern medicine or the power of allah to heal your child, you would choose allah?
oh i love religion. water into wine, virgin birth, a talking snake, its like Harry Potter but it causes genocide and bad folk music. Its my favorite dead beat dad story, check it, God fathers this kid after a one night stand, and wants nothing to do with him, then jesus becomes famous and then God wants him to live with him. Shaq had the same thing happen to him, he did a song about it called " my biological didnt bother" and Brian from family guy did the same thing by getting involved in his son's life when he became famous
Tab Khan Muslims believe that the Qur'an contains a message from an all-powerful, all-knowing, infallible being. If this is true then it should not contain any errors, mistakes, or information that contradicts known facts about the universe. If even one error exists in the text of Islam's holy book then the claims of divine authorship and infallibility are not true. The Qur'an mentions numerous times that the sun and the moon travel in an orbit, but does not mention once that the earth does too. This is consistent with a earth-centered (geocentric) view of the cosmos that places a motionless earth at the center of the universe and all "heavenly bodies" travel around the earth. This was the prevailing understanding of the universe prior to the 16th century when Copernicus helped explain and popularize a sun-centered (heliocentric) view of the universe. Tellingly, the sun's orbit is always mentioned in the context of night and day
According to islam non believers of islam will be thrown into hell And Christianity says the similar thing As a neutral and non believer of any religion how can i conclude that which religion is saying truth and which religion should i choose and why?
Chrisrians dont believe in Islam and Muhammad pbuh and the Quran, meanwhile Muslims believe, respect AND love Jesus peace be upon him, my advice for you brother is do some research, Christianity has a contradiction here and there, and the whole concept of the trinity doesn't make much sense and the oldest bible is in greek while jesus spoke aramaic, unlike Quran which has stayed in its original language and not a single letter has changed throughout the years, The Quran, like dr zakir naik mentioned, has so many miracles in it, like your heart must be blind to ignore all of this because the eyes can and WILL see all of these miracles, but like i said brother you need to do some research, and if you want i can give one of my social media accounts as a contact where i'll be open to any questions you have, and if i can answer it i will be very glad to help you out brother
Well its clear when you see people Changed bible many times but quran didn’t change, holy book has the words of god, normal person cant change those words, we got the oldest quran on the Museum but where is the oldest bible? It got changed bruh
Can anyone else see his logical fallacy? Well all 3 probability logical fallacies! 1st. No atheist claims that everything is completely random. (Note: Atheists does not have a worldview, you have to ask each of them). But most of us believe that there are natural forces (such as gravity, electromagnetic forces, etc...) and other phenomenons that drives the universe around. It may seem that it could be random but NOT 100% random, there are thing we can know about it. For instance, if we let go a ball roll down a bumpy hill, it may bounce around and end down hill anywhere. It may seem very random to us because we are not carefully thinking about the placement, measurements and the entire path of the road. If we analyze all the variables, and physical laws of nature we can predict with a high accuracy where it will end up. So it’s not 100% random, there are natural forces/influences. So you can’t just give all the outcomes equal chances. 2nd. also, the probability for something that has already occurred is always 100%. The probability for to us exist is 100%, because we exist. But let’s disregards all previous 2 logical fallacies and assume that our current state of the universe has not yet happened and the Naturalist theories were to be 100% random, well here is the 3rd fallacy: 3rd. If we want to analyze if God exist or not (by any method) we have to analyze both data’s together, NOT SEPARATE. We can agree that: 1) the probability of a set to happen is equal to #of outcomes in that set divided by the total #outcomes that it could exist. 2) With a God (and Inteligente Design), this god created our universe as it is, and there is only one possible outcome that there could have it been (the one this or these gods intended to be). So the probability for our universe to exist (assuming God exist) it’s equal to 1/1 = 100% (as Naik explained). 3) Without a God (and with a 100% random view), there are so many way our universe could have come to, as Naik explains. So the number of possible outcomes that our universe could have been is by a B amount (B = big number, close to infinity). So the probability for our current outcome (assuming that there is no god) it’s 1/B which is approximately equal to 0% (also as Naik explained). However he missed out that: 1) the probability for each outcome (assuming God does not exist) are all the same = 1/B. And it’s not exactly 0%, it’s just very small. 2) the probability that anything could happen (assuming God does NOT exist), it’s equal to the total number of outcomes in our set we are analyzing (B) divided by the total number of outcomes there is in our sample space (also B) = B/B = 1 = 100%!!!! So if we look back: - The probability that anything can happen assuming God exist = 100% - The probability that anything can happen assuming God does NOT exist = 100% Here you can see this logical fallacy, they are different cases. The total sum does not equal 100% (100% + 100% = 200% not 100%) so they can’t be compared with each other. Also each case is already assuming that god exist or does not exist is true for each respectively, so both will be true if we assume that both are true (which is also wrong to do!). So if we want to actually compare them, well we just have to combine the data: -So there are B amount of outcome if God does NOT exist and all is 100% random. -There is only 1 outcome if God does exist (by intelligent design). - The total #of possible outcomes are B+1. So the probability for got to exist = #outcomes in the set/total #outcomes = B/(B+1) Since B is very larger. Let’s assume if B approaches infinity. So The limit of B/(B+1) as B approaches infinity is equal to 1!!! So I other words the probability for God to NOT EXIST is equal to B/(B+1) = 100%. (Or very close to it). Now let look at, what if God exist. The it’s probability = #outcomes in the set/total #outcomes = 1/(B+1) the limit of 1/(B+1) as B approaches infinity is equal to 0!!! So therefore, the probability for God to exist is 0%!!!! (Or very closed to it). And you can also see that 100% + 0% = 100% because they are categories that can be compared. This is the better way to ask this so that we can compare if God exist or not. Which according to this math God does not exist. NOTE!!!! I used this math just to pint out Naik is 3rd Logical fallacy. However, my better argument does NOT actually prove that God does not exist!!! This is still a logical fallacy because I disregarded my 1st premises (about that it’s not 100% random and not equal weighted probability/outcome)!!! I said that different outcomes have different weights because it’s not completely random. So our outcome to us to exist (without God) could have a bigger probability than others. Also God has magical powers so magic can be the explanation to anything. So here is where the 4th (extra) fallacy comes up (circular argument): we cannot say that the reason that god exist is because we and our universe exist because god made it. That is circular argument. You have to show why god is the only and DIRECT explanation that our universe and we exist (not just because God did it, that is circular argument). So, it’s not the only explanation: Natural (not 100% random) forces is a big candidate and the closest to our reality. And there are more (but not many believe in, like magic fairies). Since there are at least 2 possible about how our universe could come to exist, then a better answer to that question is that: “We don’t know until sufficient evidence is founded” and it’s not a big deal!!! Because big claims needs big support!!! And logical too!!! That’s is my rant of this year 🙃 Hope everyone is having a great week 😊
See Reason Why 13 Famous Scientists Converted To Islam And What They Found* #إنجليزي ، انظر لماذا 17 عالم مشهور اعتنقوا الاسلام ، وماذا وجدوا! 1)Keith L. Moore Professor Emeritus, Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Toronto. He was amazed by the accuracy of the statements made in the Quran in the 7th century. Statements about embryology. Before anyone knew anything about it. These statements in the Quran could not be based on scientific knowledge of the time so it must have come from God. 2) E. Marshall Johnson Professor and Chairman of the Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, and Director of the Daniel Baugh Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. He also talked about embryology in the Quran. He said that Prophet Muhammad must have got this info from some source and that he has no issues that it came from God. 3)T.V.N. Persaud Professor of Anatomy, and Professor of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. He said for a man to make such profound statements about science in the seventh century is amazing. He said it could not be mere chance. 4)Joe Leigh Simpson Professor and Chairman of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA. He said he sees no conflict between genetics and Islam. He said Islam could guide science. He said the knowledge in the Quran is from God. 5)Gerald C. Goeringer Professor and Co-ordinator of Medical Embryology in the Department of Cell Biology, School of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington DC, USA. He said the Koran described human development and commingling of the gametes through organogenesis. He said nothing in history has seen such a feat besides current day science. 6) Alfred Kroner Professor of the Department of Geosciences, University of Mainz, Germany. He talked about the origin of the universe and how it would be impossible for a man like Prophet Muhammad to know about this from his own mind. He said science today proves what the prophet said 1400 years ago. 7)Yushidi Kusan Director of the Tokyo Observatory, Tokyo, Japan. He talks about astronomy and using telescopes. He said that the Quran has true facts about astronomy. 8)Professor Armstrong Professor Armstrong works for NASA and is also Professor of Astronomy, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA. He was amazed by what the Quran says about astronomy and how the ancient writing of the Quran agrees with modern science today. 9)William Hay Professor of Oceanography, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA. He was very interested how this information in the Quran could have this science in it and that it must be from God. 10) Durja Rao Professor of Marine Geology teaching at King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. He said that the Quran could not be simple human knowledge and must be from a Supernatural Force. 11) Professor Siaveda Professor of Marine Geology, Japan. He said the Quran is almost unbelievable and a very remarkable book. 12) Tejatat Tejasen Chairman of the Department of Anatomy and is the former Dean of the faculty of Medicine, University of Chiang Mai, Chiang Mai, Thailand. He said all the facts of science in the Quran can be scientifically proven today. 13) Dr. Maurice Bucaille Born in 1920, former chief of the Surgical Clinic, University of Paris, has for a long time deeply interested in the correspondences between the teachings of the Holy Scriptures and modern secular knowledge. He said it is impossible to explain how a book produced at the time of prophet Muhammad could contain ideas that have only been discovered today. How could a man know these facts without the slightest of error. news-af.feednews.com/news/detail/f7fa9839105d4
Now apply that theory to the atheist scientists that also get most of their statements right. What is the probability that Einstein could figure out nuclear physics? Well he was an atheist. See how this theory of probability stops working in your favour once you look at all the people who are right about things, right now? It’s the scientists, not the theists.
@@barrywhite1770 Did you just ask what is the probability of 1 of the smartest human beings ever, figuring out "nuclear physics"? id say pretty high.. now you either have to accept that an illiterate man (the prophet pbuh) was 1 of the smartest human beings on earth, ever! or that he was given knowledge that is out of this world. also, einstein wasn't an atheist. he was agnostic.
@@NsightToday well atheist depends on your definition of a god. Einstein was an atheist to most theistic versions of a “god”. I don’t think he believed in some being that changes the laws of physics on a personal whim like that depicted in the bible or Quran. Sun standing still for a couple days would mean the earth suddenly stopped rotating. There is no way Einstein believed in such a god.
@@NsightToday Well I understand that the Islamic version of a god includes such things as inspiring people to narrate books, or caring about the sexual activity of humans. I find such a god unbelievable. The whole mythical fantasy of demons and angels etc. is equally unbelievable.
Quarker Here is a few Referring to the Sun and the Moon in the Qur'an, it is emphasized that each moves in a definite orbit. "It is He Who created the night and the day, and the sun and the moon. They swim along, each in an orbit. " (The Qur'an, 21:33) It is mentioned in another verse, too, that the Sun is not static but moves in a definite orbit: "And the sun runs to its resting place. That is the decree of the Almighty, the All-Knowing. " (The Qur'an, 37:38) These facts communicated in the Qur'an have been discovered by astronomical observations in our age. According to the calculations of experts on astronomy, the Sun is traveling at the enormous speed of 720,000 kilometers an hour in the direction of the star Vega in a particular orbit called the Solar Apex. This means that the sun travels roughly 17,280,000 kilometers a day. Along with the Sun, and all planets and satellites within the gravitational system of the Sun also travel the same distance. In addition, all the stars in the universe are in a similar planned motion
The Roundness of the Earth "He has created the Heavens and the Earth for Truth. He wraps the night up in the day, and wraps the day up in the night." (The Qur'an, 39:5) In the Qur'an, the words used for describing the universe are quite remarkable. The Arabic word that is translated as "to wrap" in the above verse is "takwir". In English, it means "to make one thing lap over another, folded up as a garment that is laid away". (For instance, in Arabic dictionaries this word is used for the action of wrapping one thing around another, in the way that a turban is put on.) The information given in the verse about the day and the night wrapping each other up includes accurate information about the shape of the world. This can be true only if the earth is round. This means that in the Qur'an, which was revealed in the 7th century, the roundness of the world was hinted at. It should be remembered, however, that the understanding of astronomy of the time perceived the world differently. It was then thought that the world was a flat plane and all scientific calculations and explanations were based on this belief. The verses of the Qur'an, however, include information that we have learned only in the past century. Since the Qur'an is God's word, the most correct words were used in it when it comes to describing the universe. Quarker
The Pairs in Creation Glory be to Him Who created all the pairs: from what the earth produces and from themselves and from things unknown to them." (The Qur'an, 37:36) Although the concept of ''pair'' or "couple" commonly stands for male and female, the statement of ''from things unknown to them'' has wider implications. Today, one of the implications of the verse has been revealed. The British scientist Paul Dirac, who proposed that matter is created in pairs, was awarded the Nobel Prize for physics in 1933. This discovery, called ''parité'', maintains that matter is paired with its opposite: anti-matter. Anti-matter carries the opposite properties to matter. For instance, as opposed to matter, the electron of anti-matter is positively charged and its protons are negatively charged. This fact is stated in a scientific source in this way: "...every particle has its antiparticle of opposite charge… …and the uncertainty relation tells us that pair creation and pair annihilation happen in the vacuum at all times, in all places." Quarker
Except that the book doesn't say the moon is reflected light, and it doesn't say the earth is a sphere. I also have no idea why he thinks anyone would say smoke in answer to that particular question he asks. He is a smooth talker, but he's still making invalid assumptions, and outright wrong about what his book teaches to boot. He's the best religious speaker I have ever heard, but it doesn't matter when the religion, like all others, is a fiction.
And there must be a lot of other scientific facts written in Koran, which the scientists have not yet discovered. Please reveal them also, a lot of effort of scientists will be spared. Or you are waiting for scientists to discover new things and then retrospectively say...... oh! thats already written in Koran!!
first of all. stop idol worshiping. bcz idols are non-living and man made. it cant be a God. second of all, no other scriptures have all the scientific things mentioned 100% correct other than Quran. and thirdly, whether u prove science(right or wrong) by picking and analyzing a verse of Quran or,you choose to discover a new science to prove Quran(right or wrong) the result will be the same. So it doesn't really matter who discovers the science first, whether by the Muslims or the scientists...it doesn't really matter. If Quran is right, accept it. If wrong, then don't.
Who’s watching in 2024?
মে
🙂
Me
me
Me
jesus is messenger of god not god
Alhamdulillah!
Bro plz after saying jesus plz say "Peace be upon him"
And Yes Jesus (PBUH) Is messenger of Allah
Note: God is not mentioned in the quran
Allah is mentioned!
There is no god but Allah!!
Thank you...
Anas Tech Trickz Allah in Arabic means God. So Allah= God
@@odjq Ilah is The God of Moses(pbuh) and in Hebrew Ilah means Allah subhanahu watala
@@odjq your knowledge is very limited brother...you should study before giving a statement that confidently.
@@Sadab360 you shouldn't talk like this brother, may Allah forgive you
Allah protect you Dr zakir naik and keep you alive more years dear Dr zakir naik
Ameen
Ameen
Until and unless he pays for the illegal money laundering activities in India
@@SGK2325 And you believe it because?
@@AbdurRahman-nn5eo because my dad is officer in ED
He is a gift from God to the human beings. May Allah swt grant him long iife and health with all of us. Ameen
Every mooooslim who refuses to denounce islam should be executed. Sounds unreasonable? Think about it....
He is stupidest preacher out there doesn't understand maths
ameen
Allah is as real as Poseidon
he is dumb as a rock.
La ilaha il Allah muhammadrasullullah
Now prove it, scumbag.
George. Can you prove Jesus PBUH was crusified, can you prove he’s son of god, can you prove he’s god.
@@thebottle391 I don't care - can you prove that you have any brain. Your stupid quran proves Jesus is the god. Go and find the sura.
@@George-iv1hi I know someone who read the Quran 10 times and memorizes it very well, I asked him about that and he said there's no such Surah Or Ayyah, Don't Talk about something you have no idea of please.
@@Alison-gc6gh Instead of reading this utter stupidity this someone could better invest hist time and efforts in learning real science. He could be wise man now, instead of brainless moron.
"Do you not know that to Allah belongs the dominion of the heavens and the earth and [that] you have not besides Allah any protector or any helper?" Al-Baqara : 107
Accept Jesus as Lord and Saviour
He will save you from your sin
@soulreaper i dont think so man.
if u think hell is good then u r ok.
But Jesus is better than satan bro
so stop praying and worshiping satan
@@miladjabali4382 jesus never said he was god so read your 300 different bibles to find the answer.
@@AdoptedPoo maybe u r lying or u cant read
john 20:28-29
John 5:23
there are more verses
Milad Jabali if your trying to convert people to christianity, here's a tip. Don't do it through the comment section of a video of a MUSLIM scholar giving a Q&A. AND don't reply to every comment using the same sentence. Try and mix it up a little bit.😂
Dr. Zakir Naik is a very intelligent man. Alhamdulilah.
Hahaha
Samin Khan Smart as 5 year old kid
lol good joke, watch this, it's a reply to Zakir Naik's Lies th-cam.com/video/0lh-tf3JT0o/w-d-xo.html
@@AkidulIslameditor Check the link i posted and do a research on your own!
@@AkidulIslameditor I understood your question and I've already promptly replied to you. The name of the guy asking questions in the video is Nabeel Kureshi, a well-learned Muslim turned Christian. Now, forget Nabeel's questions, why don't you check everything Zakir Naik has said like - The name of the island Charles Darwin went on it is not Kelotropis island it's Galapagos Island.
- Check, read about Charles Darwin, his book the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life.
- Check his facts about Ice age!
And the last one that makes me doubt your school education is Zaikir says Homo sapiens died 500,000 years ago. If you had gone to school and read your eighth grade's science books well, Homo sapiens is the scientific name for the human species.
How did I know this? Good education, research, read the life of Charles Darwin, Galileo Galilei, and sound knowledge. Zakhir is talking so much about evolution stating as if he is convinced it's true wherein a Bible-believing Christian knows evolution is a man-made religion.
One thing I love seeing when I bing watch all these videos is how as Dr. Zakir grew older he became much more aggressive and firm in his answers Mashallah he’s definitely a full copy of Ahmed Deedat
Because dr Zakir naik is the student of Ahmed deedat.
No he is different
No he is a bit calmer. Holy water =)
who is ahmed deedat
🌹🌹🌹 ALHAMDULILLAH 💚💚💚
أشهد أن لا إله إلا الله و أشهد أن محمداً رسول الله
@re4lity هذه لم ترد في أي حديث صحيح
@re4lity و كلنا نشهد أن عليا ولي الله لكن لا يجب قولها و إلا فقد زدت من عندك
@re4lity any sahi hadeed supporting your addition or innovation or BID'DAT?
What he just said made a lot of sense
The Path Of Deen No it not
The Path Of Deen Why ???He just say a bunch of bullshit.
@@nemanjacabarkapalordozunu he is speaking the quran
@@moosa5421 In quran ants talk and sun go to the mud and birds fly just because of Allah.
@@moosa5421 So there is nothing Scientific abouth that book.
Zakir Naik is always entertaining.
Rushikesh Salve he is giving prove references you mad I don’t know why people are feel so bad instead if they feel the truth and reality... if you don’t believe don’t say anything wrong about anyone jus feel he is right and i am wrong... why people are still blind jealous... by the way mr bean was a great entertainer... your mom never told you?
In thiz time ur looking so entertaining..coz u have no ans for right path..so poor you are
@Walter De wit not as funny as your miserable life
One who is blessed by GOD will ever understand & others won't & becomes themselves jokers & I feel pity on them...
@@abdulrafeek2563And I feel pity for you, moron.
Pleasure to see how the non believer's are burning by the light of truth.. May Allah help them.
@shirlentsu 发noyami Hahaha...you are Also burning by the light of truth...I can smell the smoke and I can see the flames...
Im sry I was a muslim and later in my teen I dont believe anymore
@@unusedchannelforeverdw i also had few of those doubts but after i got matured enough i searched these kinds of vids and it cleared all of my doubts!
@@unusedchannelforever Stop lying u bum.
@@Someone_KhabibbeatsJonesEASILYI don’t think he’s lying. I had a lot of these doubts and was scared and depressed. Dr zakir was a big part on how I started believing in Allah because athiests try showing evidence of mistakes in the Quran and all this stuff and most of them aren’t even true. So keep believing! ❤️
There is no god but Allah (SWT)
that is same thing
There is No Allah.
Mohammed made April fool by Quran.
@@kewalpatel7815 yes there are 33crores gods ur right
@@Rayan-wp3do no there is more than that.
If you want you can make one for yourself to name it whatever you want.
@@kewalpatel7815 I name it blind faith
Even IF there was no God id rather live my life and die tomorrow believing I wasn't alone and that I would be rewarded for my good deeds, than dying alone and neither existing after that.
No..that will be your low eeman...
Believing also means not knowing. Instead of believing you could't say I don't know. When you say you believe, you refuse to learn and accept new thing, while when you say I don't know, you are basically open for any experience. No other living creature worships anything. It is only that our own logic and mind turned against us, so we started to believe instead of live. Only a uncertain and unconscious mind can think of such things as god. Those minds start to believe in thing because they are losing the joy or are not getting the point of living. They are not getting the point that every second is a unique moment of life that will never repeat it self, they are not getting the point that this paradise of life can be enjoyed only with a concious mind.
Why should be a human being the centric point of universe? When we are just a microspec in this universe?
Why can't people enjoy their life without knowing certain things? What ever is or not is after life, you gotta die first to find or not find out. So until then you should be conciously living life to the fullest! Don't waste you time with believing, waste your time in understanding the life on this planet as it is, once you understand how beautiful the life here is, you will apreciate every second of it!
Well, that is doubting, which means you are going to hell🤣🤣🤣🖕🏿
@@called-matii Believing doesn't take much time, the only people who dedicate their lives believing are religious figures and some old fellows lmao
@@called-matii Couldnt agree more.
Quran 21:30
Have those who disbelieved not considered that the heavens and the earth were a joined entity, and We separated them and made from water every living thing? Then will they not believe?
How is this the BBT???
aliyan walilah
@Yekkt never claimed the Qur'an was scientific a doctrine as it gets.
the dislikes are from people not understanding math
and the likes are from the superstitious that cant face reality
@@unknonwnplayer284 maybe you're so stubborn that you can't even process information ? ever heard of the golden ration ? well that's the proof you're looking for !
@@unknonwnplayer284 ur raised racist..this is why u cant do a proper debate on the matter and just trowing insults and saying stuff that doesnt make sense....now to counter it use some more slang sure that will win u and award
@@Sifat_Rashid the stuff that doesnt make sense is why people still believe in god
@@unknonwnplayer284 Dr zakir has answered in the video of whch ur commenting on,if u have any other question u can search them up am sure he has answered pretty much all the common quedtion atheist asks
Yes ,he is a gift from Allah.As Salamu Alikum dr.Jakir Naik.
@Raj ST u r a real fool
Raj st omg hahahah may god guide us all
Raj st omg hahahah may god guide us all
@@akhtarreyaz376 I don't think u must use the word God.
Allah is one.
Allah is invisible.
Allah has no gender.
God has opposite sex goddess.
How Allah is God.
Islam says there is no god only Allah and "Hazrat Mohammad Rasulullah (S.A
W) is the last messenger of Allah.
So u must correct ur mistake.
Not Jakir , It’s Zakir
iam proud to be a musim
“Muslim”
Accept Jesus as Lord and Saviour
He will save you from your sin
No thanks, I appreciate that you’re trying to take me to right path that you believe in :)
@@flamepillarx so why do u dont want to if u know that Jesus is right way?
Milad Jabali: because Jesus is a prophet that I respect. I worship his creator and only his creator, God
May Allah grant you Jannah tull Firdous
Especially when both allah and your heaven brothel do not exist - ha ha ha, what a stupid folk.
@@George-iv1hi what if when you die youl know that everything was true and that God heaven hell exist what will it be youre reaction
Ameen
@@George-iv1hithe only stupid folk is you
These are just attempts of shaitan to weaken our Faith on ALLAH Almighty but he will always fail till Kiamat Inshallah
When Dr. Zakir Naik stands up, you're done for....
Haha
Really? What colour is the sky in the the world you're living in? LOL!
@Ahmed the Infidel LOL
Yup, I am definitely done. I am not going to waste time arguing with his particular brand of crazy.
@Johnny B Says the biggest addict. 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Still waiting on the scientific proof.
Dj Hemp2o from the Quraan you mean? do you want a scientific proof from the Quraan?
Yea, sure
Dj Hemp2o here is a few
The Pairs in Creation
Glory be to Him Who created all the pairs: from what the earth produces and from themselves and from things unknown to them."
(The Qur'an, 37:36)
Although the concept of ''pair'' or "couple" commonly stands for male and female, the statement of ''from things unknown to them'' has wider implications. Today, one of the implications of the verse has been revealed. The British scientist Paul Dirac, who proposed that matter is created in pairs, was awarded the Nobel Prize for physics in 1933. This discovery, called ''parité'', maintains that matter is paired with its opposite: anti-matter. Anti-matter carries the opposite properties to matter. For instance, as opposed to matter, the electron of anti-matter is positively charged and its protons are negatively charged. This fact is stated in a scientific source in this way:
"...every particle has its antiparticle of opposite charge… …and the uncertainty relation tells us that pair creation and pair annihilation happen in the vacuum at all times, in all places."
Dj Hemp2o and there is the embryology cycle is described in details in the Quraan. The quraan is not a science book but a few have been described to show that there is a creator who created what is mentioned and who has to control of all these.
So because the Qur'an made a reference to reproduction, this automatically means that any other entity that exists in pairs or has an opposite is included in the mitigated compost you just posted? Wow so f***ing ludicrous. The idiots who assembled in their thatched huts to make this horse-shit up had absolutely no idea what they were talking about. Seriously, matter and antimatter? A single accurate reference doesn't justify the other garbage.
Thanks Alot Dr. Zakir i have a test of probability chapter and you were the one who have Clearified it with the best example. May Allah s.w.t grant all the muslims Jannah!
21:30 doesn't say anything about the bigbang.
-
"Have those who disbelieved not considered that the heavens and the earth were a joined entity, and We separated them and made from water every living thing? Then will they not believe?"
-
Y'all are being brainwashed, there is no bigbang in the Qur'an.
The theory states that all the matter in the universe came into existence from one single extremely hot and dense point; that exploded and brought about the beginning of the universe, matches what is mentioned in the verse that the heaven and Earth (thus the universe) where once joined together, and then split apart
do you think the big bang was just an explosion?
how much do we know about the big bang? very little, then how can you compare two thing we know so little about and conclude that they are not the same.
so Newton is the creator, producer and manufacturer of gravity bcoz he told us about it for the first time.
Legend007 if allah doesn't created gravety the newton cannot discovered the gravity
haha Good one
No Newton Did'nt because his ass was already on the Ground when that apple fell.so he just named it...
Legend007 science now says that Gravity does not exist.
No, science considers gravity as a frequency which behaves accordingly to mass, heat and other classifications of gas. What YOU are thinking +Mohamed Y, is the ONE scientist in New York who challenges newton's theory. However, if you read his article, he claims that heat and gas are what keeps us down on earth. Like I said at the beginning of this paragraph, heat, and gas contribute to the effect of gravitational force. For example: If you drop a bowling ball and a feather at the same time in an area in absence to air. They will hit the floor at the same time will similar velocity. Air resistance is what causes everything to remain 'afloat'. Without these gases "on earth," we would be crushed and glued to the earth's surface. However, in outer space (where all gasses are non-existent) you remain 'afloat' you don't fall immediately. You are pulled to a large mass. +Mohammed Y, gravity is a name for a force that exists and you can't disclaim it with a sentence which isn't even properly structured. :)
Wow he looked so young then mashaAllah😆
If any one studies Qur'an, he will have lots of proofs which will help him to tell the world about the existence of Almighty God.
I am a fundamentalist Muslim and I am proud for that .
Your quran is a claim and it doesn’t prove a thing.
Then I hope you tell the proof to us we want to know.
"Then We made the sperm into a clot of congealed blood, and of that clot We made an embryo; then We made out of that lump, bones, and clothed the bones with flesh. Then We developed another creation out of it. So blessed is God, the best of Creators” (Qur'an 23: 12-14)
so can you explain why the quran is wrong about this?
@@TakeHit0how this proves god? This whole verse(obviously mistranslated and misinterpreted)
Islam is a true religion always
he was started these lots years ago...masha allaah...still speaking...allah is the creator
its been so many years yet this one's my favourite.
You must have low expectations
Guys pray for me I am searching for the straight path 😢😢😢
Are you Muslim?
In sha Allah, Allah will show you the true path
Same
@@abdulrahmanhazim6090 Are u christian?
@@studypurposeaccount9071 no I am a muslim I was just not so sure Islam was the truth
Sheesh, What amazingly warped logic.
And to believe that people actually respect this guy.
Shawn Fernandes He might be an accomplished individual in his field.
So long as that field is not philosophy or theology.
Trashy Novel
Or biology.
Trashy Novel Or anything that uses the human brain actually.
Maybe to an uneducated person with a below average IQ he seems intelligent. Anyone past kindergarden level however...
Ha, pain in this world. The pain of hell is on a max level.
Referring to the islamic description of the difference between the stages of hell being metaphorically described as the difference between a cold breeze and actual burning in fire...
Slight increases in pain can be described as opposites themselves as the feelings are two different things. Go beyond increases in numerical measurement ( which you cannot compare as they are opposites anyway) and you can jump to a max. This is beyond ever rising increases and is a max jump. This itself can always be jumped with ever rising maxes. As logically it is always at a lower measure (as you could always increase it), Allah will create a set UPSIDE DOWN maximum beyond logic. By UPSIDE down I mean that it's not max in terms of "all" you can get, but max without limitation.
SUBHANALLAH
This answere gave me goosebumps!😮❤ allah akbar!
What school did you finish?
@@George-iv1hi i have a PHD in Mathematics
@@lawlietayezova3733 Oh really, me too, but in physics. How can an educated man believe in something that utterly stupid as islam - shame on you.
@@George-iv1hi With due respect, the fact that you are educated and you are not utilizing what you have learned means shame on you! Relegion is a part of science, science is about the discovery and study of nature and universe while relegion is about worshiping the one and only God who created the universe. Science comprises of the facts and reasons that there is only one god and who deserve to be worshiped. Once you read Quran (the book revealed by Allah) without any bias and by understanding you will know. Many scientists, in past, did land on the conclusion of existence of God because of the irrefutable proof they had. Even today, we are still studying their theories and laws. May Allah grant you Hidhayah brother!
@@lawlietayezova3733 - the only thing I can tell about the Quran is that it has nothing to do with science. It refers to Noah's flood, something that definitely didn't happen. So Allah was wrong.
This Qu'ran is indeed the Word of Allah. There's no doubt about it. They can deny if they want, they can call it whatever they want, but the reality is, it is Almighty Allah who sent down this divine revelation. They are not the first disbelieve; they were many others who disbelieved before them, and they were destroyed. How can they disbelieve in Allah when they were dead, and then he created them? How? Zakir Naik should've mentioned the embryological stages of human development mentioned in the Qu'ran. That is a clear-cut proof that the Qu'ran is indeed from Allah--without a doubt. Islamaphobes will argue, and will say, "Oh, Aristotle knew this." No, he did not. He knew about the chick embryo, he did not know about the human embryo, or that it developed in stages, or what those stages were, or even what happened in those stages. And Allah mentions the complete human embryological development in several places on a microscopic level. Microscopic level! Meaning, you needed an electron microscope to figure this information out, otherwise it's impossible. Secondly, it cannot be a coincidence because it has been mentioned in several, several places what happens in the process of embryological development in exact, precise, and flawless detail. Thereby, it cannot be a coincidence. The only option left is that it is indeed a clear revelation from God. They can look up Dr. Keith Moore, if they do not believe me. Even many doctors have come to know this Qu'ran has to be from Allah; who else could write this divine book. Can they write anything like it? They criticize the Qu'ran, when they do not even know the first letter of Arabic. Instead ranting on here, I'd suggest learn Arabic, and then try to write anythng remotely close to the Qu'ran. They will not be able to do it. Allah's challenge is absolute, and even he has said they will never be able to do it. Ever. Call on your so-called scientists. Call on your philosophers. Call on your scholars. Call on your mathematicians. Call on whoever you want to. Even if all of mankind and jinn come together, they will never be able to fulfill this challenge. There are hundreds and hundreds of imitations of the Qu'ran---all of them false, and nothing like the true Qu'ran which Allah revealed. No one knew about the complete human embryological stages of development back in the day, especially not on a microscopic level. No one knew every living thing has been made from water. No one knew even the moon and sun have stages. No one knew about pain receptors. No one knew about the water cycle. No one knew that iron came from outer space. No one knew about the layers and layers of darkness in the sea. No one knew that mountains were like pegs in the Earth. No one knew the Earth was egg-shaped. No one knew every living thing has been created in pairs. No one knew the Universe was constantly expanding. No one knew how the universe began; it says in the Qu'ran very clearly, "Do not the unbelievers see the heavens and earth were one, and then we separated them." Who could've known this? It's impossible. There are other miracles in Qu'ran, and Moses (Musa A.S), has been mentioned quite frequently. The name Haman has been mentioned 6 times, and it says he was the Chief Minister for the Pharaoh at the time of Musa A.S. In modern age, Egyptologists who study hieroglyphics and such have come to know, there is quite literally a list of people who used to work for the Pharaoh at the time Musa A.S. The language for hieroglyphics was already lost 2000 years before Muhammad Sallahu Alaihi Wasallum. So it is impossible for someone to know this. Impossible. That alone should prove to someone that Qu'ran has to be from God. Has to be. Who else could write such a beautiful book with perfect, divine eloquence. If you even listen to a Quraanic recitation, you'll realize how beautiful it is. You'll realize with that alone, it cannot be the Word of Man. It can't be. The people back then, when they heard this divine eloquence, they became Muslims, because they realized Muhammad P.B.U.H was no poet, nor was he a soothsayer. They realized these are the Words of their true Lord. If you ask me, even they have more intelligence than the so-called scientists of today. In addition, there are countless linguistic miracles in the Qu'ran. For example writing entire sentences---sentences, not words---but sentences in a palindrome. You'll find many linguistic miracles in Surah Bakarah, and in Ayat-ul-Kursi. There are many mathematical miracles in the Qu'ran. For instance, there is a certain ayat in the Qu'ran, in which, if used properly, you can calculate the speed of light. Surah Ar-Rahman has a huge mathematical miracle, in which all the repeated ayats (for emphasis of course), if every verse is numbered properly, they are perfect divisible of 7. The number 7 and 19 are extremely significant in the Qu'ran. The number 19 is very significant for the Jews and Christians, because there are 19 angels which will watch over the People of Hell. Only in their Hebrew Scriptures, they knew of this. So, this is clear proof for the Jews and Christians that Muhammad Sallahu Alaihi Wassalum could not have written the Qu'ran (naudhibillallah). No way. He did not know how to read or write, let alone know Hebrew. In fact, he was the most modest among all the people. If you study his lifestyle, you will come to know he has never told a single lie. Ever. He was trusted even by his enemies; that's how modest, and trustworthy he was. The people knew him for 40 years; so how could someone who could never tell a lie against his people, tell a lie about God. Does it seem logical? Use your brains. He only told the truth. And he was prophecized in all the other worldly scriptures---especially in the Bible---that he would come, and he did come. He was indeed a real Messenger of the Almighty, and he only told the truth. Read the hadith, and the Qu'ran, and study his lifestyle, and you will come to know that he was indeed a true Prophet; in fact, the seal of the Prophets. Moreover, if you can't even write anything like the Qu'ran, which consists of mathematical, linguistic, and scientific miracles, and you of course, will never be able to, then try to find a contradiction in the Qu'ran. Any kind of error. You will not be able to. You'll go online, and many ignorant people will state this is an error, or that is an error, or this is a contradiction. It is not. It is either out of context, out of background, misinterpreted, mistranslated, or they do not understand what came before the ayat, or what came after it. They do not understand the whole of the surah (chapter), the verses before or after; they do not even know the first letter of Arabic, and they dare to criticize. Go ask a scholar, and they will explain everything to you, and you'll understand it is not an error. It is your diseased thinking.I'll give you one example: many critics will say Qu'ran says the Earth was created in 8 days in Surah Fusillat. It does not. They have mistranslated the Arabic word to 'then.' If it says 'then' then it is a contradiction. But the correct translation was supposed to be "Moreover" or "Simultaneously". If you ask a scholar, they will explain it to you, and you'll come to know there is no contradiction. None. People will say Qu'ran has grammar errors (naudhibillallah). It does not. The ignorant do not know that all the Arabic grammar they will find in Arabic textbooks---all of it, is derived from the Qu'ran. Why? Because the Qu'ran is the most superior form of Arabic Grammar. it is the highest level--and still is, and will always be, until the Day of Judgment. So, it's like measuring against a ruler, or meter stick, and saying, "This Ruler is wrong." It's completely illogical. Qu'ran has no grammar mistakes. If you study Arabic, you'll come to know that the Qu'ran's grammar is at the divine level. Never will they be able to write anything like the Qu'ran. Never will they be able to change it. Never will they be able to find any error in it. Don't they realize that Allah says in the Qu'ran, that had it been from someone other than Allah, you would've found many contradictions. But you will find none. Then again, it makes no difference to Allah whether they believe or disbelieve. Allah does not need their prayers. He does not need them. Allah is self-sufficient. We need him. So they can disbelieve if they want, but they'll come to know who is greater in numbers, and who is few in numbers on the Day when they shall stand before the Almighty, and when they are given their records of what they used to do, and they will wish they were dust. They used to deny Allah, the One and Only God, and they used the existence of Hell, so they will taste the hellfire which they used to deny.
You can respond to this if you want, but I will not respond. What message I needed to convey, I have done it. All I'm saying is stop being biased, open your eyes to the reality, and learn Islam, Qu'ran, and the hadiths with an open heart and mind, and you will come to know Allah exists. He is the one who created us, and to him we belong, and to him we shall return. Only when you see the Angel of Death, you disbelievers will find that it is too late, and you'll realize that God does exist. He is real.
Salaam.
Abdullah Aslaam-u-Alleikum, I pray Allah grants you success and happiness in this life and the highest ranks of Jannah in the next insha’Allah.
So where are this god? Hiding to see who belives in him or not? If he had exist why create all of us then only save those who belives in him? If he is god, why go to all this drama? Make no sence if you ask me. Its like making babies and then send some of them to live in pain rest of theire life and give love to some of them. If there was a god he should know that people belive what they see. So he must really hate what he has created. Strange if you ask me.
Masha'Allah this was intense hahaha 😍
Nasser K i dont need to see the oxygen. I know its there 🙂
@@elisabethsvanbergthorkilds3735 exactly we don't need to see Allah we know he's There
Brilliant... May Allah preserve your knowledge!
Aameen
th-cam.com/video/0lh-tf3JT0o/w-d-xo.html
AMEEN
@@kennethmoses4397 u gave one link while he have answerd by ALLAH's mercy very much
@@kennethmoses4397 hater
very logical by dr zakir naik. barakAllah fe
Best answer in history of zakir naik's carreer in my opinion. This is the main point that everyone needs to know.
Anaxagoras (499-428 BC) seems to have been the first to discover that the moon shines only by reflected light: Anaxagoras also explained that solar eclipses occur when the moon moves between the earth and the sun.
What will you say about the rest of the things? And what proof do you have that he was the first person? Any archaeological proof? Quran was revealed 1400 years back and can be proven by carbon dating.
Yes , i just tried to google the hard copy of his work, or maybe his tombs or any evidence of this respected philopher of ancient world in greek was exist and really wrote a book abt this knowledge but havent succeded yet .. link please
Mind blowing Answer 🤯🤯
Thanks Dr Zakir Naik 🥰
May Allah bless you 😇
Jazak-Allah 😘
Pray for my Iman
Iqra ! Do more reading to make/keep it strong : www.hamzatzortzis.com/essays_articles/
May allah make it easy for you aameen
This man is frkn intelligent
Maverick jnr No its not
@@nemanjacabarkapalordozunu he is!
Lol he is freaking stupid be talks shit the places and names of people he takes dont even exist.and he clearly dont understand how probability works he has failed his 8th grade maths i can assure u that
Only one of those actually says what he said it does
Maverick jnr yah mashaalalh
none of this is scientific evidence
Chase Stacks well do you want more scietific evidence? I can provide you with more if you want
Beisan Qaddoura sure
Chase Stacks its been 5 days is he going to show SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE?
In the Holy Quran, God speaks about the stages of man's embryonic development, 1,400 years before modern day scientists 'discovered' important information on creation of man and his development:
We created man from an extract of clay. Then We made him as a drop in a place of settlement, firmly fixed. Then We made the drop into an alaqah (leech, suspended thing, and blood clot), then We made the alaqah into a mudghah (chewed-like substance)... [Noble Quran 23:12-14]
Literally the Arabic word alaqah has 3 meanings:
leech
suspended thing
blood clot
"In comparing a leech to the embryo at the alaqah stage, we find similarity between the two." [The Developing Human p.8].
"Also, the embryo as this stage obtains nourishment from the blood of the mother, similar to the leech which feeds on the blood of others." [Human Development as Described in Quran and Sunnah p.36].
Chase Stacks
The second meaning of the word alaqah is 'suspended thing'. The suspension of the embryo, during the alaqah stage, in the womb of the mother very appropriately fits this description.
The third meaning of the word alaqah is 'blood clot'. We find that the external appearance of the embryo and its sacs during the alaqah stage is similar to that of a blood clot. This is due to the presence of relatively large amounts of blood present in the embryo during this stage. Also during this stage the blood in the embryo does not circulate until the end of the third week. So the embryo at this stage is like a clot of blood.
Starting with a conclusion, then comming up with a hypotesis, Classic!
Here Mr Naik
1) The moon was discovered to reflect the Sun's light in early Greek history. A Greek philosopher named Anaxagoras (500 BCE to 428 BCE) claimed that the moon did not produce its own light. Rather, he believed that the moon was a reflection of the Sun's light. Anaxagoras proved this through his studies of lunar eclipses.
2) Around 350 BC, the great Aristotle declared that the Earth was a sphere (based on observations he made about which constellations you could see in the sky as you travelled further and further away from the equator) and during the next hundred years or so, Aristarchus and Eratosthenes actually measured the size
Ultimately he didn’t provide any proof that can scientifically prove God’s existence nor did he even have hard evidence at all. First off, for something to be scientific, it would have to follow the scientific method which nothing that he quoted or stated is even in relation to, and it also contradicts that title of this video. All these things that he quoted from his religion’s holy book had not even touched base with the scientific method. In addition, just because something is right, doesn’t mean that it was brought to that conclusion properly. Also you can’t conclude something as the doing a higher power just because a few thing were correct . . . In order to conclude something as the doing of an high power, you’d have to prove the existence of the high power in the first place. So that basically debunks his statement that “scientists aren’t disproving god... they’re adding to his existence”. Secondly, there were many occurrences in history where primitive people have have gotten information only accomplishable by today’s science, so just because your holy book states it, doesn’t mean that your God did it...
Don't be ignorant and open your eye's. Should like Dr. Zakir Nair said, what are the probabilities for all these things to be right, if they were not written by the creator himself (God). Try to look to things with an open mind. Because how can you ignore all this evidence. Try to search with an open mind.
@@cyrawestwood3006 I’m not ignoring evidence nor am I being closed minded, because like I said before, those few things that this man used in his holy book that were right about science does not simply point to god as a result. Especially since more ancient civilizations know information like that without modern technology. For example, the Dogon tribe in Africa... they knew many things about astronomy that was only accomplishable through modern science. Not to mention that these discoveries they made are exponentially more intricate than what the guy in the video was taking about. In addition, they didn’t have a holy book nor did they have a religion that followed gods. So all I’m trying to say is that; what he gave out as “scientific evidence for god” is not evidence for anything because he is looking at a simplified result.
@@absquatulation7701 In the Quran is the following written 40:81"And he shows you his signs. Now which of Allah's signs will you deny?" There are many more signs written in the Quran. You are not convinced by these things, we got many more written in the Quran. And all these signs in the Quran are true, proven by science. Like Dr Zakir Naik said. What are the probabilities that someone from the desert could have ''guessed'' them all right?
@@cyrawestwood3006 Once again, there were other civilizations that made all these discoveries way before this. Also the way Dr. Zakir Kaik, described probability was very flawed especially since he was leaving out variables and doesn’t even stay to true to mathematics and possible events. The most likely cases is that there was some sort of alternative method than science used over centuries to lead to that outcome (that would explain the ratio between the amount of things people got right back then compared to what they got wrong), because using the correct form of probability could lead you there. So it was more than just guessing... but it most likely wasn’t a god because like I said over and over again, that would be simplification.
@@absquatulation7701 I looked up on the Dogon tribe and scientist call the knowledge they had about astronomy and mathematic incredible and are sure that they did not discover or develop them by themselves, so where does it come from?
Also how do we know that the Dogon tribe had this information available to them before it was written in the Quran?
We as muslims know that god has send far more messengers and prophets than what is written in the Quran. Some are unknown to us. How can we say that that tribe didn't receive the information from a messenger that was send by god to that tribe.
And lets say that did have this information before the Quran. How big is the chance that a man from the middle east would ever know about these people of have come in contact with these people.
There is always a chance of error even if you would use the method that you claim. But there are no errors in the signs given by god. So what you say makes no sense.
I think you think to simple. Let me ask you one question. Where does all this matter/substance we have on earth come from. If you know basic science, you know that nothing can exists out of it own. It is not possible.
Btw thank you the example for the dogon tribe, very interesting tribe. You spoke about more tribes or civilizations, could you give more examples.
It does include the big bang it also says that beyond us is darkness talking about space where its black its also says that when your in the air flying your chest gets tighter referring to airplane journeys. And the Quran also talks about sky radiation explain that one please.
Anaxagoras (2500 years ago) proposed the moon reflected light. Thales (2600 years ago) theorised about everything made of water. Just two examples.
See Reason Why 13 Famous Scientists Converted To Islam And What They Found*
#إنجليزي ، انظر لماذا 17 عالم مشهور اعتنقوا الاسلام ، وماذا وجدوا!
1)Keith L. Moore
Professor Emeritus, Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Toronto.
He was amazed by the accuracy of the statements made in the Quran in the 7th century. Statements about embryology. Before anyone knew anything about it. These statements in the Quran could not be based on scientific knowledge of the time so it must have come from God.
2) E. Marshall Johnson
Professor and Chairman of the Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, and Director of the Daniel Baugh Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
He also talked about embryology in the Quran. He said that Prophet Muhammad must have got this info from some source and that he has no issues that it came from God.
3)T.V.N. Persaud
Professor of Anatomy, and Professor of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
He said for a man to make such profound statements about science in the seventh century is amazing. He said it could not be mere chance.
4)Joe Leigh Simpson
Professor and Chairman of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
He said he sees no conflict between genetics and Islam. He said Islam could guide science. He said the knowledge in the Quran is from God.
5)Gerald C. Goeringer
Professor and Co-ordinator of Medical Embryology in the Department of Cell Biology, School of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington DC, USA.
He said the Koran described human development and commingling of the gametes through organogenesis. He said nothing in history has seen such a feat besides current day science.
6) Alfred Kroner
Professor of the Department of Geosciences, University of Mainz, Germany.
He talked about the origin of the universe and how it would be impossible for a man like Prophet Muhammad to know about this from his own mind. He said science today proves what the prophet said 1400 years ago.
7)Yushidi Kusan
Director of the Tokyo Observatory, Tokyo, Japan.
He talks about astronomy and using telescopes. He said that the Quran has true facts about astronomy.
8)Professor Armstrong
Professor Armstrong works for NASA and is also Professor of Astronomy, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.
He was amazed by what the Quran says about astronomy and how the ancient writing of the Quran agrees with modern science today.
9)William Hay
Professor of Oceanography, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
He was very interested how this information in the Quran could have this science in it and that it must be from God.
10) Durja Rao
Professor of Marine Geology teaching at King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
He said that the Quran could not be simple human knowledge and must be from a Supernatural Force.
11) Professor Siaveda
Professor of Marine Geology, Japan.
He said the Quran is almost unbelievable and a very remarkable book.
12) Tejatat Tejasen
Chairman of the Department of Anatomy and is the former Dean of the faculty of Medicine, University of Chiang Mai, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
He said all the facts of science in the Quran can be scientifically proven today.
13) Dr. Maurice Bucaille
Born in 1920, former chief of the Surgical Clinic, University of Paris, has for a long time deeply interested in the correspondences between the teachings of the Holy Scriptures and modern secular knowledge.
He said it is impossible to explain how a book produced at the time of prophet Muhammad could contain ideas that have only been discovered today. How could a man know these facts without the slightest of error.
news-af.feednews.com/news/detail/f7fa9839105d4
According to Newton's 3rd law
Every action has an equal opposite reaction
Then
If we are re actions
Then who did action
And you athiests believes that
The action whatever happened is just co incident.
You believe that. Because of that supernatural powerful thing this action like big bang happened
But you don't believe that
That much powerful thing also can think like us
Go and read Quran
In Quran
1400 yrs ago
God said about embryology
Whole big bang theory with in a small verses.
How can a human have that much of knowledge that time without any adavanced instruments.
You athiests peoples believe
Because of that power whole universe formed
But you denied
that power is just a
co incident. That power has no intelligence
And just co incident
.
In my views that power has intelligence and that is God Almighty
Because of this, Almighty sent many messengers on earth with Almighty's messages
See in Quran
*See Reason Why 13 Famous Scientists Converted To Islam And What They Found*
#إنجليزي ، انظر لماذا 17 عالم مشهور اعتنقوا الاسلام ، وماذا وجدوا!
1)Keith L. Moore
Professor Emeritus, Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Toronto.
He was amazed by the accuracy of the statements made in the Quran in the 7th century. Statements about embryology. Before anyone knew anything about it. These statements in the Quran could not be based on scientific knowledge of the time so it must have come from God.
2) E. Marshall Johnson
Professor and Chairman of the Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, and Director of the Daniel Baugh Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
He also talked about embryology in the Quran. He said that Prophet Muhammad must have got this info from some source and that he has no issues that it came from God.
3)T.V.N. Persaud
Professor of Anatomy, and Professor of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
He said for a man to make such profound statements about science in the seventh century is amazing. He said it could not be mere chance.
4)Joe Leigh Simpson
Professor and Chairman of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
He said he sees no conflict between genetics and Islam. He said Islam could guide science. He said the knowledge in the Quran is from God.
5)Gerald C. Goeringer
Professor and Co-ordinator of Medical Embryology in the Department of Cell Biology, School of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington DC, USA.
He said the Koran described human development and commingling of the gametes through organogenesis. He said nothing in history has seen such a feat besides current day science.
6) Alfred Kroner
Professor of the Department of Geosciences, University of Mainz, Germany.
He talked about the origin of the universe and how it would be impossible for a man like Prophet Muhammad to know about this from his own mind. He said science today proves what the prophet said 1400 years ago.
7)Yushidi Kusan
Director of the Tokyo Observatory, Tokyo, Japan.
He talks about astronomy and using telescopes. He said that the Quran has true facts about astronomy.
8)Professor Armstrong
Professor Armstrong works for NASA and is also Professor of Astronomy, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.
He was amazed by what the Quran says about astronomy and how the ancient writing of the Quran agrees with modern science today.
9)William Hay
Professor of Oceanography, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
He was very interested how this information in the Quran could have this science in it and that it must be from God.
10) Durja Rao
Professor of Marine Geology teaching at King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
He said that the Quran could not be simple human knowledge and must be from a Supernatural Force.
11) Professor Siaveda
Professor of Marine Geology, Japan.
He said the Quran is almost unbelievable and a very remarkable book.
12) Tejatat Tejasen
Chairman of the Department of Anatomy and is the former Dean of the faculty of Medicine, University of Chiang Mai, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
He said all the facts of science in the Quran can be scientifically proven today.
13) Dr. Maurice Bucaille
Born in 1920, former chief of the Surgical Clinic, University of Paris, has for a long time deeply interested in the correspondences between the teachings of the Holy Scriptures and modern secular knowledge.
He said it is impossible to explain how a book produced at the time of prophet Muhammad could contain ideas that have only been discovered today. How could a man know these facts without the slightest of error.
news-af.feednews.com/news/detail/f7fa9839105d469431fcbf089972ca4f?client=news
@@qwerty-vf5bv It's wonderfull that you cite newtons third law. It shows you have interest in science! I admire that. However, using this law only adds a new problem: If everything has a cause, then what was the cause of god? The answer, that he was always there, makes no sense to the third law.
Quantum mechanics is challeging the idea that everything needs a cause.
Fact is, that we don't know why we are here, why anything is here. There are theories, and one of them is a creator - always leaving the question open: who or what created the creator?
I am not affraid of not knowing, to not have a definite answer. Claiming to have a definite answer, would be highly arrogant. Perhaps there is a creator, perhaps not. Perhaps everything is an accident, perhaps not. Not-knowing brings out the quest of science, the quest of proof.
The Quran is a badly written book, just like every religious book. Any interpretation is open to debate, and anyone who interpretes it says he is right and everyone else is wrong. Therefore, so called holy books have no proof value to me. And to say that book was the first, for example, that the moon reflected light, is simply not true.
I am happy that you have the certainty you seek in life. I do not wish to take it away from you. For me, I like facts and the curiousity that comes from not knowing where there are no facts yet.
I wish you well.
Quran is not a book of science.. its a book of signs. We dont bring the holly book to the debate of science and degrade the holly book as a sceience book. .. taht so naive in my perspective We need to think and have a bit knowledge to see the signs. Scientists are people that see the sign of Allah every single day but they are not a seeker of the truth. They look but they refuse to see,, are they expected Allah will showed up according to their flavour of ideas or they imaginations (if they have any , i doubt iit) Allah is nothing alike any of His creatures ,, nothing can be compared to Him and He dont follow mens Rules or laws. Allah dont follow the physics laws because He s the one wno created it.. make sense to me. The evidence of Allah is every where , the atheist scientists denied it and cancel Allah from their books . Good luck then and dont forget ppl who brought knowledge and science as a light to the darkness of europe was moslem their knowledge was inspired by the quran amd those noble men were the people of faith And its really funny to find out in this so called modern days or post modern what ever flavor u would like to call it , their murids (students) become atheist .. hmm. Maybe because in the history we know that they stole the book of science artifact from baghdad.. there was no baraka, they didnt have ijaza to prcatice all of those knowledge, without baraka theres no hidaya .. so they are now become atheist wont realky suprised me
Btw i couldnt find any hard copy of this greek man book aT least the picture of his book, scriptures or stones what ever .. i have googled it .. but havent found them yet
Good luck then we all wait til, the moment the truth. We all gonna die and at last we will meet our hard evidence in person ..see u later
people says gold are find in south africa
But i says it is also available on the channel of Dr. Zakir naik
Scientific method is to fetch a conclusion from observations and experiments..... instead of imagining a conclusion before seeking evidence of its validity. There are multiple scientific inaccuracies in religious scriptures which reflect their iron age manmade origin.
Such as? Don't try to look intelligent and intelectual. People smarter than you, scientists who know more science than you concluded there is a God. What are your credentials?
@@ofdd1031 people like you crave for a master to make sense of your sufferings. You'll always follows other people, but not your reason because this is what you've surrendered for the vagaries of dogmatism.
@@ABCXYZ-hc5zw "people like me" have actually used the brain to impartially understand if there is any coherence in existence of God. And "people like me" and other people from the golden age of science, philosophy and so many areas have agreed that it is deeply stupid to think that all of this imperfectly perfect world is just a result of infinite randomness. That's just being blind and scared to acknowledge that there is Someone above us. And no, its not about suffering because yeah everyone suffers but everyone has happy koments too, and that is deeply incoherent as if I was afraid of suffering I wouldn't be following a religion where there are so many restrictions and it is harder than you folks who live just to live without any purpose. I can actually teach you if you want, but I guess you are too arrogant to acknowledge that "people like me" might be right. I genuinely apologise if I offended you by the way.
@@ofdd1031 based on what evidence?
Thats Blasphemous
He is trying to twist the worlds of Quran to fit with the knowledge we have today to make it sound like the Quran was correct 1400 years ago. For example two words are being used in Quran to describe light one for the sun "siraj" and one for the moon "nur" which actually describes two types of light, one is brighter than the other, but he is twisting the meaning of those words to sound like one is own light and one is borrowed light. The Quran also says Allah has placed the sun the moon and the stars in the heaven or sky, would Allah not know that the sun is also a star? The word `nuran`(nūr) is the word used for the moon`s light and certainty it doesn`t mean reflected/derived/borrowed light as this liar guy is manipulating here.because same word `nūr` is used to describe light of Allah in Quran in 5:15,9:32, "siraj" is used for sun and it's also used to describe for Muhammad, so he means to say Muhammad has his own light and god has borrowed light?,
That's his own theory, not the words of Quran. And again, many greek scientists had the same knowledge about the earth during those times. The things he described about embryology anatomy and botany, nothing is clear in Quran. They are all interpretations being made from scholars later on after knowing the established facts of science. Even if you think all the words of Quran are correct, how dies it prove that it's form God? Newton was right about all his theories of gravity, does it mean it was a revelation from god too? He also says Darwin's evolution theory is "Just a theory" and not mentioned in the Quran so it must be false, then according to him, Quantum theory, and string theory are also not correct, and just theories because they are not mentioned in the Quran, does it make any sense?
yawn...... go back to your godless existence.
carlosillich787 I can only show you the truth. It's up to you to decide for yourself
carlosillich787 If god was true why use lies to prove his existence?
Hellsong89 A lot of success of Islam is based on fear. They are threatened with the fear of hell, eternal torture and death for apostate. They are also tempted with eternal paradise after death, and lots of booty
He uses the word borrowed light to explain it fool - not to put it directly
He called it the sun (not the star)
Because a humans call it the sun
"Hey our star is rising
I like the star set" I don't think so
Stop manipulating his words
"It is He Who created the night and the day, and the sun and the moon. They swim along, each in an orbit. "
(The Qur'an, 21:33)
It is simple observation to see the sun set on one side and then rise on another and think it is going around you thus orbiting, that doesn't take any extra advanced scientific knowledge to know that. And the sun is NOT orbiting only the earth is doing the orbiting which proves even further that it is based on simple observation and nothing more. If the Qur'anor or Bible were scientifically accurate, how did they get evolution so wrong?
"He has created the Heavens and the Earth for Truth. He wraps the night up in the day, and wraps the day up in the night."
(The Qur'an, 39:5)
when you stand and turn in a circle and look at the horizon it appears to be round so a common expression in those time was the "round of the earth" and you can definitely wrap something around an object that has a flat surface. Nothing in that verse proofs they had any advances scientific knowledge.
"Glory be to Him Who created all the pairs: from what the earth produces and from themselves and from things unknown to them."
(The Qur'an, 37:36)
That verse is incredibly vague and could mean thousands of different things depending on what's convenient to your world view. The most obvious meaning is that pars are male and female and are produced by whats in the world and themselves (sex and calories) and things unknown are whatever magic dust people thought god used at that time. It wouldn't make sense to refer to subatomic particles, if he made all positive/negative particles from the earth and from themselves then what made the earth and themselves if there were no subatomic particles before then?
Tell me when the scientists found that baby is born by sperm?
Tell me
Tell me 100 years ago or 200 years ago or 300 years ago
But it is written in Quran 1400 years ago
Tell me how?
Wtf do you have a brain? 1400 years ago, nobody knew these things. And even so less, an illiterate person.
@@miu869 if nobody knew these things then how these are already written in Quran majeed 1400 years ago
Tell me.
@@miu869 no one knew in that time that a human borns by sperm
Then how 1400 years ago it is written in Quran.
The fact that moonlight was reflected sunlight was initially theorized by anaxagoras around 500- 400 BC
But is there any logical proof of allah in the world anywhere???
@ 2:38 Stephen hawking spotted right down corner :)
Yes he was a student of Him.......
How do you think he discovered BLACK HOLE?
Nah its not him
@@AthleticMuslim 😂😂😂 we know it's not him pagal hai kya
•Knight Eagle • it’s ok to correct someone, but don’t call them stupid because everyone makes mistakes.
@@flamepillarx I am a Muslim and I respect him and wish nobody calls him stupid.
Id love to see what would happen if we abandoned religion for 100 years. I think the world would become far nicer
Some people who's Profession is Religion will be Jobless......
@@mohamedmoinudeen2206 exactly brother, most people who comment that this is not correct, Allah (SWT) doesn't want them to believe, so it's better if those who have been guided not argue with them..........as there are signs right in front of them, but they don't see them!
Search jason search , what do you have to lose just pick a coran read it and if you got questions ask zakir or yousef estes i think he is in usa right now , you've got nothing to lose and nobody to convince .
Jason Steward I know we’d become nastier than even animals
@@humzermuneer6030 That makes no sense. Some of the worst atrocities were commited with religious intent/ backing. Throughout history we have seen people massacred for not converting to new faiths from invading forces. The native Americans, Africans and even Asians and Aboriginals all died in 'animalistic' ways due to religion. When you have no religion, you cant convert anyone. Simple as that.
I think he's been growing the same beard for his whole life lol
lllllllllolol yep these fanatic religious idiots think the longer the beard the more devout muslim , greek orthodox , jew orthodox etc. they are and will be revered as holy men when in fact their long religious beard is nothing more than the direct result of how brainwashed they are
lol its their beliefs let em do what they want
@@jojojojo5353 yes but I want to ask you that what happens when a Sikh has a beard? Isn't he the same orthodox about which you are talking for Muslims?? I want to ask you that what happens when your famous Hindu pandits have beards?? Isn't it the same orthodox for which u are blaming Muslims??? So if it is so then hold ur tongue or otherwise someday ur own pandits will rip it off...
@@jojojojo5353 Numbers Chapter 6
@@jojojojo5353 Hey you piece of sh*t do you have reference?
I have so many problems, I feel depressed, no one likes me I cant talk well to people, am not good at doing daily tasks, is it all because I am an atheist?
God doesn’t make your life bad because your an atheist but I advise you becoming muslim
Religious people who believe in God also have problems...just look at palestine people innocents getting killed for no reason...now is it all because they r NOT atheist?..no...see life is a test for every human being
Quran
Big bang (21 : 30)
Expansion of the Universe (51:47)
Big crunch (21:104)
Water come from sky (space) (23 : 18)
Allah organisms are made out of water (21 : 30)
Black Holes (56 : 75)
Iron is from Space (57 : 25)
There is darkness in the depths of the sea.(24:40)
Earth is orbiting on its axis (Surah Al-Zumar, Ayat : 5)
Sun is moving in orbit (i.e around Sagittarius A*) (21:33)
Moon is moving in orbit (21:33)
Mountains are like Stakes (78:6-7)
Female bees make honey (16:68,69)
Pain Receptors in skin (4:56)
Frontal Lobe (96:15-16)
The Sky's protection (21:32)
There is darkness in the depths of the sea.(24:40)
Internal Waves in the Oceans (24:40)
The meeting of two different seas (55:19-20)
Apart from these there are many other scientifically proven verses.
How could an illiterate man in the desert 1400 years ago know all this?
Think...
We like you brother for the sake of Allah.
@@sahilkumar-vq6hu Obviously! When a person is disconnected to His Creator then at some point in his life he feels empty & depressed.
We have body & soul. The soul is in need of the Creator. And the body only gets activated when soul enters the body, the consciousness in the brain & conscience in the heart comes from the soul.
Just try to get a connection with the Creator who is All-knowing, All-Aware, All-Hearing, All-Seeing, All Powerful, All-Authoritative, The Creator of all Power, The Eternal Possessor of Sovereignty and yet Most Kind, Most Merciful of those who show Mercy, Most Forebearing, Most Patient, Most Loving.
The answer given by Zakir shows only his own sad scientific illiteracy and poor understanding of actual scientific methods. His comments are filled to the brim with logical leaps the size of mountains and meaningless analogies.
I can give you another answer on who would be the first to understand this imaginary object Zakir talks about:
The first person who could explain to you how it works would be the first scholar who observed it and conducted experiments into its behaviour and functionality, not necessarily the creator of the object (a meteorite is a flying object for example that has never been explained to us by its creator - because its "creator" doesn't have any agency, rather the first to explain how a meteorite works was the first person who observed and understood it - and no, false explanations like "it was send by god", who are not based on reason do not count as science or evidence for the existence of god).
Also the theory of probability is falsely presented here.
Science is not just wild-gessing anything out of a set of alternatives. The probability that the earth is flat or hexagonal is not equal to the probability that it's a sphere - despite Zakir treating both alternatives as equally probable. The latter is of course vastly more probable because our observations heavely suggest it and it makes sense considering other theories of the universe (notice however, that Zakir doesn't mention where THESE things are said in the Quran, if i have the opportunity to read them i am extremly sure that they will turn out to be as absurd as everything else that comes out of his mouth)
The Quran does not mention the big bang theory with one word.
In -Surah Anbiya Ch. 21: V. 30- it merely says that those who disbelieve might have forgotten that heaven and earth have once been one entity.
To say that this references the explosion of a singularity and the following cosmic expansion is as absurd as saying the Bible references darwins theory of evolution when it says, that the animals of the sea have gone on land and vice versa in the book of wisdom, it merely means that the people of ancient times were not morons but actually observed what was going on around them and had philosophical thoughts which they wrote down in the Quran, the Bible and other works.
The notion that living things were created out of water is already mentioned by ancient philosophers around 800 B.C. and does not originate from the Quran (as barely anything does).
I do not expect any believer to have read until this point but if you did:
May science and progress lead to your enlightenment! - because listening to this guy surely won't.
Also, a creator doesn't necessarily know how his creation works : th-cam.com/video/R9OHn5ZF4Uo/w-d-xo.html
The amount of arrogance we humans show just being able to explain a very insignificant amount of the world around us in other words "Science", is truly astonishing. May Allah help us to overcome such arrogance.
The only thing he hypothetically proves is that the author of the Quran was educated in the science of the time, in case all of these "hundreds" of scientific passages he mentions are even in it. But his theory of probability amounts to imagining everything on this planet as a Laplacian experiment and pretending that means anything.
You can do the exact same procedure with any advanced maths book by editing out the citations, asking some random passerby if they know the author of any of the 150 theorems present in it and going "Oh, you don't know any? Well, the probability that it's all right is (0.5)^150. Which is small, so god must have written it." Absolutely intellectually disingenuous and the worst part about it is that people eat this shit up. Good on you for calling it out, as it should be.
@@naikyou But historical evidence proves Prophet Mohammed (SM) never had any education on science or history. Nor he was scholars to any Christian scriptures or Egyptian culture.
In fact he couldn't read and write. So this argument doesn't stand.
Besides Quran contains information about the old kingdom of Egypt which was lost to the knowledge of the people for thousands of years and only recently discovered by archeologist. So that's also an important point to consider.
No matter what you will always cry
This is a long way of saying you do not have scientific evidence.
Just like science itself can't prove Singularity(in the big bang theory) scientifically....😋
@@iam.......5025 nope. You obviously don't know what you are talking about.
@@notyou7421 Hello Brother
Quran 2:3-5
who believe in the unseen, establish prayer, and donate from what We have provided for them,
and who believe in what has been revealed to you ˹O Prophet˺1 and what was revealed before you, and have sure faith in the Hereafter.
It is they who are ˹truly˺ guided by their Lord, and it is they who will be successful
@@blackxdeft5791 quoting the Quran is the claim, not evidence.
@@notyou7421 , Right but see the first line of what I have quote
Assalam o alaikum warahmatulahi wabarakatuh
I don't have any questions but I'm a practicing Muslim Alhamdulillah and it's great to see your videos
Watching in 2024
🌹
Ma'shAllah, this content is still helping us. May Allah reward you.
Allah doesn't exist.
@@fitzburg63bro is mad that he replied to most comment
@@Sho3laishere Islam is dead already, stupid lies will not keep it alive.
Very intelligent ❤️🤓☪️☪️☪️☪️
Without getting into whether or not the logic was right, the shape of the earth was known long before the Quran was written, in Ancient Greece.
Moreover, in a way, we are made of a combination of hundreds of "materials" or compounds, so saying that the body is literally water is like saying all the water on the earth is sea water, or that all the air we breathe is nitrogen. I am pretty sure humankind already knew about bodies having water at that point, but was not able to find when exactly this discovery was made.
Lol In which book have u seen it?
Bjp.com pa?
You're pretty Sure?
Wow congrats you invented Time machine
Sale Desert ka logho ka pash itna information kaisa aya Thoda soch la gandu
Try Mordern Science with Hinduism you'll find it Hinduism kitna galta hai (old scripture) toh bhul hi jao
@@evileye7803 Expected some ranting on this as well.
First one, I verified. Greeks had indeed discovered the earth was round using the concept of varying shadow lengths. In fact they also estimated the circumference of the earth to within a thousand kilometres.
Second one seems logical, considering that humans would have probably known that several mammals in the surroundings have high water content. You don't need to be some extraordinary scientist to see that if animals consume water and their bodies generate steam on heating, and sweat, that their bodies also naturally contain water.
Also, my beliefs shouldn't matter to this discussion because I am discussing solely about historical facts.
@@rushilkaul Greeks didn't even able to discover that Earth is round not flat lol
It discovered in 1500 century
Leave 1400 years you can't even able to imagine that water is the reason behind life 500 years ago
Now you can assume anything & believe that
Quran is the only Holy Book where every single Scientific Reference are correct
Quran is Book of SIGN not Science
If ALLAH wanted to give every detail then that book gonna be higher than Burj Khalifa
@@evileye7803 Eratosthanes was a Greek mathematician who discovered the circumference of the earth using flag poles in Alexandria around 2000 years ago:
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eratosthenes
Many of these peices of information were either already known peices of information among scholars in that time, or are explained very vaguely in the Quran (humans being made of water is definitely not a clear scientific finding). Even if these were all well explained, highly accurate peices of information, it would only work in a cumulative case towards proof of Allah, rather than proof on it's own. All it would prove on it's own is that either the old Islamic scholars were privy to more information than we thought, or that the Quran was modified later on to fit with new information.
Quran does NOT say that moonlight is reflected light. "Noor" or "Munir" only means light/shine/radiance not derived/borrowed/reflected light. Kindly see for yourself in any dictionary. The earlier translations such as Pickthall's nowhere mention that moonlight is a reflection. Only the Sahih International translation is nowadays adding the word "derived light" to forcefully reconcile the Quran with science. Kindly go to quran.com to check this as translations from different authors are available there.
@@SMShah-nc6rv Yes "Muneer" translates to light only but not reflected light, so the Quran is simply describing the moon as a shining body.
@@SMShah-nc6rv Kindly provide me a link to an online English to Arabic dictionary which translates "Munir" to "illuminated by light". I suspect you are making up the translation.
@@SMShah-nc6rv The word "Munir" gets translated to "lightsome", "shiny", "gorgeous", "luminous" in Google Translate but there is no mention of "reflected/reflection".
Went to quran.com.
Various translations of ch 25 : v 61 are there but none of them mention moonlight as a reflection:
DR. GHALI
Supremely Blessed is He Who has made in the heaven constellations, and He has made therein a luminary and an enlightening moon.
MUHSIN KHAN
Blessed be He Who has placed in the heaven big stars, and has placed therein a great lamp (sun), and a moon giving light.
PICKTHALL
Blessed be He Who hath placed in the heaven mansions of the stars, and hath placed therein a great lamp and a moon giving light!
SAHIH INTERNATIONAL
Blessed is He who has placed in the sky great stars and placed therein a [burning] lamp and luminous moon.
YUSUF ALI
Blessed is He Who made constellations in the skies, and placed therein a Lamp and a Moon giving light.
MUFTI TAQI USMANI
Glorious is the One who made stellar formations in the sky, and placed therein a lamp (i.e. the sun) and a bright moon.
ABUL ALA MAUDUDI (WITH TAFSIR)
Most blessed is He Who set a constellation in the heavens, and placed in it a great lamp and a shining moon.
DR. MUSTAFA KHATTAB
Blessed is the One Who has placed constellations in the sky, as well as a radiant lamp and a luminous moon.
@@SMShah-nc6rv All what you have written shows confirmation bias and wishful interpretation. The sun and the moon LOOK/APPEAR different, and have different properties (sunlight is accompanied by heat but not moonlight in comparison) that is why different words have been used to describe them.
If Allah swt created the whole world, why could they not put a single extra word while revealing the verse which specifically meant "reflected" in the Arabic language (which is "Aineikas")? It is people like you and Zakir Naik who are "forcefully inserting" words which are not there.
Translators MUST NOT change the translations of the verses because that would be DISHONESTY. None of the Arabic words in the verse means reflected so the translation must not mention it otherwise that would be a CLEAR LIE.
Stars are luminous too but the light they emit is their own.
The verse which "seems" like it is describing Big Bang is actually repeating mythologies from Bible and previous cultures and hence is not the first one to describe creation in such a way before the scientific era👇
th-cam.com/video/mTsJwnBTPkQ/w-d-xo.html
@@SMShah-nc6rv You are dishonestly inserting the word "reflected" which is not in the verse.
You did not watch the video for which I gave you the link. So lemme write it here. Apart from Bible, numerous cultures thought that the sky and the Earth were joined:
The Greeks who said in the beginning there was only water (the God Oceanus), and then Eurynome separated the sky from the sea by dancing on the waves of Oceanus.
The Dhammai of India, The Diegenos of California - Earth and heaven had to be separated because no room for growth in the darkness otherwise.
The Romans - separation of heaven and earth by a natural force - a Godin Ancient Greece Kronos (Time) castrated his father and separated heaven and earth, similarly with the Continental Celts.
Creation myth of the Krachi of Africa- the God of heaven rests firmly on Earth and human offspring are nearly smothered, and by lots of squirming father is sent up higher and higher.
Maori and other Polynesian people said that the sky father and earth mother clung so tightly that their children had no choice but to force them apart.
The Snohomish of North Western Africa - people banging their heads against the sky so heaven and earth separated.
In Mongolia, Udan separates heaven and earth with 99 golden columns.
Vietnam giant Khong raises the sky from the earth with his head.
Mesoamerica the Mayan feathered serpent and the God Tepeu use their immense power to separate heaven and earth.
Many more such myths in "Creation Myths of the World" by David Adams Leeming.
abdullahsameer.com/blog/creation-myths-of-the-world/
SubhanAllah what a learned man he is! If only all of us even had the 5pc of wisdom he does, the world would be such a beautiful place to live in! From Dongri, Mumbai, India.💜
Most verses what he said isn't there in the Quran, there's a verse where I found about heaven and earth but this guy said it's the big bang theory
Hard to believe any scholar
No bro "heaven" means "sky" in Arabic(there are many meaning of it) you can check several verses where heaven means Sky. I think you will be confused because of arabic words
Everything he said is in the quran. Don't make a fool out of yourself
Sura wakiah
Ayat 75
Go and study
The question was NOT answered.
WHAT was stated was CLAIMS for evidence,
NOT PROOF.
WHERE was
the Scripture Scientific ANALYSIS (Formula) shown
the Scripture Scientific EXAMPLE (Formula) shown
the Scripture Scientific PROOF for the EXAMPLE (Formula) shown
Although being correct about ONLY the creator
is able to provide understanding to
his creation. A servant to the creator
would understand the DIFFERENCE between
a CLAIM based off of PHILOSOPHY percentages
and a Fact based on ABSOLUTE PROOF.
His answer was entertaining. Let me give you another answer to prove God does exist. Despite being a muslim, the scope of my answer will remain within the existence of God and that a God is needed for everything to exist. Accepting Allah later as the God is something one can come to know by the miracles of the Holy Quran and the Doctor mentioned.
There are several things science believes.
1 That time had a start and maybe the universe is say at its 14.5 Billionth year right now and that in the begining during the big bang, only a few seconds had passed... that is time had a start! Just like how we start a stop watch and it was once at 0.
2 When too much mass gathers in one place (like a Blackhole), Time is essentially 0 inside that area.. as in Time gets stopped and no process can occur.
3 The human mind is limitless.
Then answer me this... if the universe really was a gaint lump of mass even more concentrated and more in mass than the biggest blackholes... then Time definitely had to be 0 upon it.... as in its stuck! If time is stuck... how does a process (Big Bang) even occur? And who put all that unbelievable amount of mass and gave that mass space to be in?
The only answer to a process starting is... you need a Higher Being not Himself bound to Time space or that mass to trigger a process that removes the said mass from its stuck 0 Time state and allow a big bang to occur for the formation of the universe. In other words, Time itself is also a creation to which the Creator is not bound.
Then they usually ask you... but who created God? How did God come to be? This where the 3rd point "humans have limitless brains" being proven false comes into equation. Our brains are not limitless. We can think of many many things but there is a big limitation on our brain... we can think only with regards to the physical limitations of our universe... which includes Time/Space/Mass/Energy/Physical laws etc. We cannot imagine how a Being like God can work without Time and Space and neither can we imagine how He Can exists without Time and Space nor imagine his form. Since He is not bound to time, the entire question "When did God start existing OR who was before Him' become null and void as these questions are dependant on taking time into account to which God is not bound.
As a result, we cannot imagine what God is like or how He was already there, but we do come to the conclusion that you needed an outside factor like God to start the ignition of the universe's engine in the beginning.
you might want to answer why your god hides. until you can, you make no sense :)
@@jojojojo5353 Because we are so weak a mere blackhole brought closer to earth will mean our end. You want a God greater than the universe to manifest Himself on the universe? Be thankful He isn't doing so otherwise everything would end instantly. Also, while this isn't my domain to speak of as I don't know the complete truth but He May not be hiding, if you've read my post above and grabbed the context, based on that He May Be present everywhere but we cannot perceive Him because perceiving Him is beyond the limits of this universe and our limited brain.
@@ultrapowerlevel excuses exsuses, with all the gods humans have created in history your excuses for your god not making its presence known to ALL hold no water :)
@@jojojojo5353 So you want God to show Himself to you and show you heaven and hell and then say, "you follow me and I will make you enter heaven" And then you do? You make no sense. He has given you intellect, please make use of it.
@@mythbusterhere how does that not make sense? What reason does one have to believe in god if he doesn't try to reveal himself to you?
By what basis would you know that the word you know in Arabic means exactly what it meant when it was written? Your thoughts on the word itself would differ from the meaning of the author.
Because the language was not forgotten, it's still used the same way, same dictionary, millions of people are using it and if you ask an arabic professore (who teaches arabic!) he would know.
In a mothe's womb were two babies.One asked the other: "Do you believe in life after delivery?"The other replied,"why,ofcourse.There has to be somthing after delivery.Maybe we are here to prepare ourselves for what we will be later."
"Nonsense", said the first. "There is no life after delivery.What kind of life would that be?"
The second said, "I don't know,but there will be more light than here.Maybe we will walk with our legs and eat with our mouths.Maybe we will have other senses that we can't understand now."
The first replied, "that is absurd.Walking is impossible.And eating with our mouths?Ridiculous! The umbilical cord supplies nutrition and everything we need.But the umbilical cord is so short.Life after delivery is to be logically exculded."
The second insisted, "Well I think there is something and maybe it's different than it is here.Maybe we won't need this physical cord anymore."
The first replied "Nonsense".And moreover,if there is life,then why has no one ever come back from there?Delivery is the end of life,and in the after-delivery, there is nothing but darkness and silence and oblivion.It takes us no where."
"Well I don't know,said the second, but certain we will meet mother and she will take care of us."
"The first replied "Mother"?You actually believe in Mother?That's laughable.If mother exists then where is she now?"
The second replied, "she is all around us.We are surrounded by her.Without Her,this world would not and could not exist."
Said the first, "well I don't see her,so it is only logical that she doesn't exist."
To which the second replied,"Sometimes,when you are in silence and you focus and listen,you can perceive Her presence and you can listen Her loving voice,calling down from above."
Maybe this was one of the best explanations of the concept of GOD
loved it❤️❤️
@@DrShayanmalik ❤
Nice but babies don’t struggle in womb like humans struggle in earth.
اللَّهُ لَا إِلَٰهَ إِلَّا هُوَ الْحَيُّ الْقَيُّومُ ۚ لَا تَأْخُذُهُ سِنَةٌ وَلَا نَوْمٌ ۚ لَّهُ مَا فِي السَّمَاوَاتِ وَمَا فِي الْأَرْضِ ۗ مَن ذَا الَّذِي يَشْفَعُ عِندَهُ إِلَّا بِإِذْنِهِ ۚ يَعْلَمُ مَا بَيْنَ أَيْدِيهِمْ وَمَا خَلْفَهُمْ ۖ وَلَا يُحِيطُونَ بِشَيْءٍ مِّنْ عِلْمِهِ إِلَّا بِمَا شَاءَ ۚ وَسِعَ كُرْسِيُّهُ السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالْأَرْضَ ۖ وَلَا يَئُودُهُ حِفْظُهُمَا ۚ وَهُوَ الْعَلِيُّ الْعَظِيمُ
Adel Youssef جزاك الله خيراّ
Jazakallah khairah🌹 my belief in Allah gets more stronger
He claims the Koran 21:30 has anything to do with the big bang, but it mentions earth. No planets existed until billions of years after the big bang. Epic fail.
Maurog well that what happen when you are too dumb to even learn a language art, earth and sky
it doesnt really that it is earth or it is sky, it means that a resources of a young earth use to unite to all thing in universe, witch is in big bang, epic fail and you are dumb really
There is only 1 creator.
Saif Uddin humans creates things also 🙃
@@thoughtsengineer by using the things that was created by the creator originally
1 1/2
Why this channel isn't available???
So while listening to this at the very start i felt something horribly wrong with his reasoning. He said if he met an atheist he would congratulate him. To this I thought "hmm okay, but why?"
Then he said he would congratulate the atheist because he left his false gods and is closer to making shahadah... REALLY? He doesn't accept the fact that there are atheists from ISLAMIC backgrounds as well? Like people who reject the idea of God despite their parents being religious and muslim? Would he congratulate such an atheist? Is that sort of atheist closer to making shahadah?
This is certainly not the first time I've heard him be ignorant. I wish he would hear the criticism of him in order to improve his speeches and better himself in his reasoning.
99.9% of muslims that became athiest did not practice Islam, and did not pray, nor read Quran, or are ever even bothered to do that
Mechanical engineer student "i would like to aks you a question 😂"
0:03
4:18 Keep stating post hoc rationalizations with your confirmation bias, yes thats convincing :thinking:
Darken this isn’t post hoc rationalization. He never claimed that the Quran is the reason why the moon reflects light or why the sun moves. Post hoc rationalization is when you reason that since an event took place before another, that it caused the other event. The Quran is clear in what it says. The language it was written in is the same language it is studied in today
Keep following him inshaallah........you will grow spiritually
The guy who asked the questions is smiling by the end of the video, and so am i. It feels great when your questions are answered satisfactorily 😊😊
I wanna like this video infinite times ❤❤
So ull get 72 virgins by doing so?
@@shaggygaming4612 who said this ? :/ what wrong with your mentality come on
Why do u do good deeds?
@@shaggygaming4612 To get to jannah. I'm doing it for the one who created me. And you and the whole universe.
Btw who insane would do bad things ?
Like are you really against my good deeds ?
@@amaantalpur2932 any what do you get in jannah?
Even, even if there was no reward for good deeds and bad deeds neither if there wasn't a God, I love to live like a Muslim ❤❤✌
According to Newton's 3rd law
Every action has an equal opposite reaction
Then
If we are re actions
Then who did action
And you athiests believes that
The action whatever happened is just co incident.
You believe that. Because of that supernatural powerful thing this action like big bang happened
But you don't believe that
That much powerful thing also can think like us
Go and read Quran
In Quran
1400 yrs ago
God said about embryology
Whole big bang theory with in a small verses.
How can a human have that much of knowledge that time without any adavanced instruments.
You athiests peoples believe
Because of that power whole universe formed
But you denied
that power is just a
co incident. That power has no intelligence
And just co incident
.
In my views that power has intelligence and that is God Almighty
Because of this, Almighty sent many messengers on earth with Almighty's messages
See in Quran
*See Reason Why 13 Famous Scientists Converted To Islam And What They Found*
#إنجليزي ، انظر لماذا 17 عالم مشهور اعتنقوا الاسلام ، وماذا وجدوا!
1)Keith L. Moore
Professor Emeritus, Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Toronto.
He was amazed by the accuracy of the statements made in the Quran in the 7th century. Statements about embryology. Before anyone knew anything about it. These statements in the Quran could not be based on scientific knowledge of the time so it must have come from God.
2) E. Marshall Johnson
Professor and Chairman of the Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, and Director of the Daniel Baugh Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
He also talked about embryology in the Quran. He said that Prophet Muhammad must have got this info from some source and that he has no issues that it came from God.
3)T.V.N. Persaud
Professor of Anatomy, and Professor of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
He said for a man to make such profound statements about science in the seventh century is amazing. He said it could not be mere chance.
4)Joe Leigh Simpson
Professor and Chairman of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
He said he sees no conflict between genetics and Islam. He said Islam could guide science. He said the knowledge in the Quran is from God.
5)Gerald C. Goeringer
Professor and Co-ordinator of Medical Embryology in the Department of Cell Biology, School of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington DC, USA.
He said the Koran described human development and commingling of the gametes through organogenesis. He said nothing in history has seen such a feat besides current day science.
6) Alfred Kroner
Professor of the Department of Geosciences, University of Mainz, Germany.
He talked about the origin of the universe and how it would be impossible for a man like Prophet Muhammad to know about this from his own mind. He said science today proves what the prophet said 1400 years ago.
7)Yushidi Kusan
Director of the Tokyo Observatory, Tokyo, Japan.
He talks about astronomy and using telescopes. He said that the Quran has true facts about astronomy.
8)Professor Armstrong
Professor Armstrong works for NASA and is also Professor of Astronomy, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.
He was amazed by what the Quran says about astronomy and how the ancient writing of the Quran agrees with modern science today.
9)William Hay
Professor of Oceanography, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
He was very interested how this information in the Quran could have this science in it and that it must be from God.
10) Durja Rao
Professor of Marine Geology teaching at King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
He said that the Quran could not be simple human knowledge and must be from a Supernatural Force.
11) Professor Siaveda
Professor of Marine Geology, Japan.
He said the Quran is almost unbelievable and a very remarkable book.
12) Tejatat Tejasen
Chairman of the Department of Anatomy and is the former Dean of the faculty of Medicine, University of Chiang Mai, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
He said all the facts of science in the Quran can be scientifically proven today.
13) Dr. Maurice Bucaille
Born in 1920, former chief of the Surgical Clinic, University of Paris, has for a long time deeply interested in the correspondences between the teachings of the Holy Scriptures and modern secular knowledge.
He said it is impossible to explain how a book produced at the time of prophet Muhammad could contain ideas that have only been discovered today. How could a man know these facts without the slightest of error.
news-af.feednews.com/news/detail/f7fa9839105d469431fcbf089972ca4f?client=news
Yeah
Prophet Muhammad s.a.w got first position in most influential person in the world history ranking by Michael h.hart
Because of Prophet Muhammad s.a.w teachings
And in this cruel world there's no place for humanity
So it's difficult to live like a Muslims
But better than others
Also
Some black sheeps means
Wrong followers of islam
Like isis and others are making there own rules.
And after researching many people's are accepting Islam.
Because they know isis is wrong.
And thats why Fastest-growing religion in America is Islam.
Respect to Muslims of All over the world
And Aslamualaikum.
See Reason Why 13 Famous Scientists Converted To Islam And What They Found*
#إنجليزي ، انظر لماذا 17 عالم مشهور اعتنقوا الاسلام ، وماذا وجدوا!
1)Keith L. Moore
Professor Emeritus, Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Toronto.
He was amazed by the accuracy of the statements made in the Quran in the 7th century. Statements about embryology. Before anyone knew anything about it. These statements in the Quran could not be based on scientific knowledge of the time so it must have come from God.
2) E. Marshall Johnson
Professor and Chairman of the Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, and Director of the Daniel Baugh Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
He also talked about embryology in the Quran. He said that Prophet Muhammad must have got this info from some source and that he has no issues that it came from God.
3)T.V.N. Persaud
Professor of Anatomy, and Professor of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
He said for a man to make such profound statements about science in the seventh century is amazing. He said it could not be mere chance.
4)Joe Leigh Simpson
Professor and Chairman of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
He said he sees no conflict between genetics and Islam. He said Islam could guide science. He said the knowledge in the Quran is from God.
5)Gerald C. Goeringer
Professor and Co-ordinator of Medical Embryology in the Department of Cell Biology, School of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington DC, USA.
He said the Koran described human development and commingling of the gametes through organogenesis. He said nothing in history has seen such a feat besides current day science.
6) Alfred Kroner
Professor of the Department of Geosciences, University of Mainz, Germany.
He talked about the origin of the universe and how it would be impossible for a man like Prophet Muhammad to know about this from his own mind. He said science today proves what the prophet said 1400 years ago.
7)Yushidi Kusan
Director of the Tokyo Observatory, Tokyo, Japan.
He talks about astronomy and using telescopes. He said that the Quran has true facts about astronomy.
8)Professor Armstrong
Professor Armstrong works for NASA and is also Professor of Astronomy, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.
He was amazed by what the Quran says about astronomy and how the ancient writing of the Quran agrees with modern science today.
9)William Hay
Professor of Oceanography, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
He was very interested how this information in the Quran could have this science in it and that it must be from God.
10) Durja Rao
Professor of Marine Geology teaching at King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
He said that the Quran could not be simple human knowledge and must be from a Supernatural Force.
11) Professor Siaveda
Professor of Marine Geology, Japan.
He said the Quran is almost unbelievable and a very remarkable book.
12) Tejatat Tejasen
Chairman of the Department of Anatomy and is the former Dean of the faculty of Medicine, University of Chiang Mai, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
He said all the facts of science in the Quran can be scientifically proven today.
13) Dr. Maurice Bucaille
Born in 1920, former chief of the Surgical Clinic, University of Paris, has for a long time deeply interested in the correspondences between the teachings of the Holy Scriptures and modern secular knowledge.
He said it is impossible to explain how a book produced at the time of prophet Muhammad could contain ideas that have only been discovered today. How could a man know these facts without the slightest of error.
news-af.feednews.com/news/detail/f7fa9839105d4
assalamualaikum
I miss Zakir's official debate because I have never seen it. Where all speakers sit as equals as moderated guided speakers.
There are 3 videos of the formal zakir debate but zakir loses and is confused.
During this time I saw zakir only doing lectures interspersed with questions and answers. Zakir as a speaker and other people ask.
It means that Zakir controls the debate stage
Can you please share the link of those videos?
I am a Muslim; I watched this video to find the answers; and to my disappointment, I could not find it. The reason: this is not scientific proof for those not believing in the Quran is the Book of GOD, let alone its scientific miracales, for there are some philosophers before BC, for instance, Anaxagoras (499-428 BC) who talked about the moon's light and sun rotation, and these references are most of the time used in debates in western educational institutions. No offense. May Allah guide us. Ameen.
5:57 the guy is like: "hmmmm¿¿,wait what¿?"
Lol😂
I'm an Agnostic, I've read three translations of quran by renowned scholars and I most certainly disagree with him on all points. First of all several things that he has mentioned are not described in quran as he says. He either uses his own Arabic dictionary or extrapolation and misrepresentation of actual words of quran. Secondly, If we assume for a minute that its all true though its not, most of the things that he mentions existed in Indian subcontinent(interestingly the country we both are from) more than 1000-2500 years before it was mentioned in quran like Aryabhata's book Aryabhatiya, Arya-sidhanta and one book which was translated in Arabic Al ntf or Al-nanf similarly things related to medical science and physiology can be found in Charaka Samhita, Sushruta Samhita, and Atharva veda, the same goes for metallurgy, natural science and these texts are written by scholars of ancient times of course they have discrepancy but since it was not word of god so its fine. Now if I take his words seriously then I need to start following/praying to every one of them since unlike quran which offers vague description these books provides exact description and are at least twice as old. Now let me point out how Mohammed and his follower may have known about these stuffs. First of all Mohammed was illiterate so most of his things related to science will be based on hearsay and thus is supposed to be vague and inaccurate which is what quran really is when it comes to science. Now, there has always been a continuous relationship/interaction between middle east and Indian subcontinent in ancient times via trade, visits and wars/invasions which was a potential source of all the hearsay also, several texts had been translated in Arabic by scholars of ancient times. I would say this is more likely the reason for vague and incorrect things in quran related to science than assuming it was message of Allah the almighty who made deliberate mistakes while giving the message. Please read the history of the place you are born before spouting bullshit. By the way I'll have a doctor degree pretty soon though mine is not from bachelor but PhD so your stupid and childish arguments whether its related to science or spirituality doesn't impress me. Further more the root cause of vagueness of quran seems very apparent when you talk about theories like big bang or evolution since it seems you go by the hearsay as well and describe bullshit instead of actual thing. You are just good at remembering surah and ayat numbers sometime content as well but either you haven't read actual science or can't comprehend or remember it.
It is very important that we read the earliest translations because they give the unbiased and true view of the Koran. People like Zakir Naik are just stealing from the west and their discovery and manipulating the Koran and Arabic in an attempt to convert people.. The global oil prices are crashing, hopefully we can say good bye to oil soon and say hello to renewable clean energy, then those Arabic nations can drink their oil.
Look man, the only book I found personally (and all Muslims say) which is exactly the same as before in its original text is Quran.
I can challenge you that you won't ever find a single word mistake or even letter mistake in the Quran, and there are billions of Arabic Quran in the world and non of them is different from the other. Even the copyright machines could make a mistake while making thousands of Quran just like they do in other makings, but they didn't do in the time of Quran.
This is my challenge :)
AbdulRahim Siddiqui It seems your previous comment isn't here but it shows on google notification. Anyways I personally do not care much about what it says about believer or nonbeliever except when some extremists say Quran is absolute word of god and everything should be taken literally which sometime also suggests to kill those who reject the invite from Islam. I'm more concerned with people's claim about science in Quran cause I do not personally see it the way a devout sees it and so everything is open to constructive criticism. I'm sorry and no offence to you but as I see it, you may have comprehensive knowledge of quran but you do not have comprehensive knowledge about physics, evolution, astrophysics and other related branches of science and thus all this time you have been forwarding me hearsay. I apologize my comment may seem rude but I mean no disrespect just that this particular conversation about existence of god will yield nothing. We can converse in a way where you can tell me about Quran and I can tell about science but I'm pretty sure it will not prove existence of god in any way.
Non taken :)
In fact, that gives me an idea.
How about this, find a video or someone's criticism on a quranic verse about science who found an error in it, then find an opinion of scholars about the same verse (what it's actually saying). If the opinion is covering the criticism then it means the criticism is false and scholars are telling the truth. If the criticism has more weight than opinion, then tell me about that error too. How is it Mr. Satish? :)
satish kumar Did you get my message?
May Allaha protect dr zakir naik and others of Muslim scholars
Love for dr zakir naik from Pakistan
i am certain others have comments. Atheism is NOT a belief, simply a statement that the time to believe in a god, is when there is sufficient evidence. that is all. Stop the straw man arguments. Is this not more honest that declaring "god did it".
Secondly stop with false equivalences... learn how to think critically. If you make any claim that "god did it", then you need to prove a god exist first.
Can you prove to me that god doesn't exists. I am truly interested.
@@cyrawestwood3006 I did not make that claim (ie that a god does not exist). Please reread my comment. I am completely neutral; until there is evidence for a god i will not believe and neither do i deny its existence.
I doubt you are "truly interested" otherwise you would have simply read my message/
The rational position is not to presuppose a god exists and then use confirmation bias to prove it. This is not how reasoning works. Follow the evidence.
i could very well say that goblins on Mars are speaking to me and instructing me to hate all people with the initials CW. It is not for YOU to disprove that goblins exist, is it ? I made the claim, burden is on me. Now i would hope you would respond to me with "prove goblins exists, giving verifiable evidence and not quotes form ancient texts or metaphysics". Do you agree ?
Until there is evidence of any supernatural being the correct response to something we do not understand is "I do not know", right ? It is NOT to claim a god did it (because you FIRST need to prove god exists). It really not a difficult point to grasp and rational (otherwise you must believe in my claim of goblins without evidence).
for the religious, and even me, it is a scary position to say "i do not know", because of the overwhelming urge for humans to know things.
Hope this helps.
@@tariq_sharif Maybe I have understood it wrong. But I was sincere when I said that I am truly interested.
But you say that you won't believe in god until you have prove. How much prove do you need? Just look at all the prove given in the Quran and you still reject it?
You are not any different than the people in the times of the prophets who rejected god. They would see miracles with their own eyes and they would reject it, calling it magic.
There are signs in the Quran and you reject it. Do you truly believe you are unbiased to what is written in the Quran.
"for the religious, and even me, it is a scary position to say "i do not know", because of the overwhelming urge for humans to know things." I agree with you, we humans are very curious and we like to know everything. But one thing we all agree on is that we won't receive all the answers to our questions in this life. That is the sad truth.
But just because don't have answers to ALL our questions. There are enough signs that push us in the right direction.
the person who ask clearly stated "scientifically" on his question,, not deduction
What is not scientific about what Dr. Zakir Naik has said. You must know that the quran is not a book of science but a book of signs. So how are you going to reject these signs. I am 100% sure god exists, lets say 1000% sure. How sure are you and ask yourself and be honest, where is your proof.
@@cyrawestwood3006 so if your child had cancer and you could only choose either modern medicine or the power of allah to heal your child, you would choose allah?
oh i love religion. water into wine, virgin birth, a talking snake, its like Harry Potter but it causes genocide and bad folk music. Its my favorite dead beat dad story, check it, God fathers this kid after a one night stand, and wants nothing to do with him, then jesus becomes famous and then God wants him to live with him. Shaq had the same thing happen to him, he did a song about it called " my biological didnt bother" and Brian from family guy did the same thing by getting involved in his son's life when he became famous
zionist?
Tab Khan Muslims believe that the Qur'an contains a message from an all-powerful, all-knowing, infallible being. If this is true then it should not contain any errors, mistakes, or information that contradicts known facts about the universe. If even one error exists in the text of Islam's holy book then the claims of divine authorship and infallibility are not true.
The Qur'an mentions numerous times that the sun and the moon travel in an orbit, but does not mention once that the earth does too. This is consistent with a earth-centered (geocentric) view of the cosmos that places a motionless earth at the center of the universe and all "heavenly bodies" travel around the earth. This was the prevailing understanding of the universe prior to the 16th century when Copernicus helped explain and popularize a sun-centered (heliocentric) view of the universe. Tellingly, the sun's orbit is always mentioned in the context of night and day
Tab Khan
wikiislam.net/wiki/Scientific_Errors_in_the_Quran
errors in the Qur'an written by zionist written wiki?! NO thanks
Tab Khan yes man west and America everyone who is not Muslim wants to defame islam .Assholes look into the mistakes rather closing your eyes.
According to islam non believers of islam will be thrown into hell
And Christianity says the similar thing
As a neutral and non believer of any religion how can i conclude that which religion is saying truth and which religion should i choose and why?
Chrisrians dont believe in Islam and Muhammad pbuh and the Quran, meanwhile Muslims believe, respect AND love Jesus peace be upon him, my advice for you brother is do some research, Christianity has a contradiction here and there, and the whole concept of the trinity doesn't make much sense and the oldest bible is in greek while jesus spoke aramaic, unlike Quran which has stayed in its original language and not a single letter has changed throughout the years, The Quran, like dr zakir naik mentioned, has so many miracles in it, like your heart must be blind to ignore all of this because the eyes can and WILL see all of these miracles, but like i said brother you need to do some research, and if you want i can give one of my social media accounts as a contact where i'll be open to any questions you have, and if i can answer it i will be very glad to help you out brother
Well its clear when you see people Changed bible many times but quran didn’t change, holy book has the words of god, normal person cant change those words, we got the oldest quran on the Museum but where is the oldest bible? It got changed bruh
@@impantavat Quran was changed too.
@@Lordidudewhen?
any proof
Amazing dr. Zakir please keep doing the da'wah. Thank you
Asian people are so good at maths, Mashallah
Can anyone else see his logical fallacy? Well all 3 probability logical fallacies!
1st. No atheist claims that everything is completely random. (Note: Atheists does not have a worldview, you have to ask each of them). But most of us believe that there are natural forces (such as gravity, electromagnetic forces, etc...) and other phenomenons that drives the universe around. It may seem that it could be random but NOT 100% random, there are thing we can know about it. For instance, if we let go a ball roll down a bumpy hill, it may bounce around and end down hill anywhere. It may seem very random to us because we are not carefully thinking about the placement, measurements and the entire path of the road. If we analyze all the variables, and physical laws of nature we can predict with a high accuracy where it will end up.
So it’s not 100% random, there are natural forces/influences. So you can’t just give all the outcomes equal chances.
2nd. also, the probability for something that has already occurred is always 100%. The probability for to us exist is 100%, because we exist.
But let’s disregards all previous 2 logical fallacies and assume that our current state of the universe has not yet happened and the Naturalist theories were to be 100% random, well here is the 3rd fallacy:
3rd. If we want to analyze if God exist or not (by any method) we have to analyze both data’s together, NOT SEPARATE.
We can agree that:
1) the probability of a set to happen is equal to #of outcomes in that set divided by the total #outcomes that it could exist.
2) With a God (and Inteligente Design), this god created our universe as it is, and there is only one possible outcome that there could have it been (the one this or these gods intended to be). So the probability for our universe to exist (assuming God exist) it’s equal to 1/1 = 100% (as Naik explained).
3) Without a God (and with a 100% random view), there are so many way our universe could have come to, as Naik explains. So the number of possible outcomes that our universe could have been is by a B amount (B = big number, close to infinity). So the probability for our current outcome (assuming that there is no god) it’s 1/B which is approximately equal to 0% (also as Naik explained).
However he missed out that:
1) the probability for each outcome (assuming God does not exist) are all the same = 1/B. And it’s not exactly 0%, it’s just very small.
2) the probability that anything could happen (assuming God does NOT exist), it’s equal to the total number of outcomes in our set we are analyzing (B) divided by the total number of outcomes there is in our sample space (also B) = B/B = 1 = 100%!!!!
So if we look back:
- The probability that anything can happen assuming God exist = 100%
- The probability that anything can happen assuming God does NOT exist = 100%
Here you can see this logical fallacy, they are different cases. The total sum does not equal 100% (100% + 100% = 200% not 100%) so they can’t be compared with each other. Also each case is already assuming that god exist or does not exist is true for each respectively, so both will be true if we assume that both are true (which is also wrong to do!).
So if we want to actually compare them, well we just have to combine the data:
-So there are B amount of outcome if God does NOT exist and all is 100% random.
-There is only 1 outcome if God does exist (by intelligent design).
- The total #of possible outcomes are B+1.
So the probability for got to exist = #outcomes in the set/total #outcomes = B/(B+1)
Since B is very larger. Let’s assume if B approaches infinity. So
The limit of B/(B+1) as B approaches infinity is equal to 1!!!
So I other words the probability for God to NOT EXIST is equal to B/(B+1) = 100%. (Or very close to it).
Now let look at, what if God exist. The it’s probability = #outcomes in the set/total #outcomes = 1/(B+1)
the limit of 1/(B+1) as B approaches infinity is equal to 0!!!
So therefore, the probability for God to exist is 0%!!!! (Or very closed to it).
And you can also see that 100% + 0% = 100% because they are categories that can be compared. This is the better way to ask this so that we can compare if God exist or not. Which according to this math God does not exist.
NOTE!!!! I used this math just to pint out Naik is 3rd Logical fallacy. However, my better argument does NOT actually prove that God does not exist!!! This is still a logical fallacy because I disregarded my 1st premises (about that it’s not 100% random and not equal weighted probability/outcome)!!!
I said that different outcomes have different weights because it’s not completely random. So our outcome to us to exist (without God) could have a bigger probability than others. Also God has magical powers so magic can be the explanation to anything.
So here is where the 4th (extra) fallacy comes up (circular argument): we cannot say that the reason that god exist is because we and our universe exist because god made it. That is circular argument. You have to show why god is the only and DIRECT explanation that our universe and we exist (not just because God did it, that is circular argument). So, it’s not the only explanation: Natural (not 100% random) forces is a big candidate and the closest to our reality. And there are more (but not many believe in, like magic fairies).
Since there are at least 2 possible about how our universe could come to exist, then a better answer to that question is that:
“We don’t know until sufficient evidence is founded” and it’s not a big deal!!! Because big claims needs big support!!! And logical too!!!
That’s is my rant of this year 🙃
Hope everyone is having a great week 😊
Cry
Can this also apply to Christianity and Hindus?
basically most of monotheism
See Reason Why 13 Famous Scientists Converted To Islam And What They Found*
#إنجليزي ، انظر لماذا 17 عالم مشهور اعتنقوا الاسلام ، وماذا وجدوا!
1)Keith L. Moore
Professor Emeritus, Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Toronto.
He was amazed by the accuracy of the statements made in the Quran in the 7th century. Statements about embryology. Before anyone knew anything about it. These statements in the Quran could not be based on scientific knowledge of the time so it must have come from God.
2) E. Marshall Johnson
Professor and Chairman of the Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, and Director of the Daniel Baugh Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
He also talked about embryology in the Quran. He said that Prophet Muhammad must have got this info from some source and that he has no issues that it came from God.
3)T.V.N. Persaud
Professor of Anatomy, and Professor of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
He said for a man to make such profound statements about science in the seventh century is amazing. He said it could not be mere chance.
4)Joe Leigh Simpson
Professor and Chairman of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
He said he sees no conflict between genetics and Islam. He said Islam could guide science. He said the knowledge in the Quran is from God.
5)Gerald C. Goeringer
Professor and Co-ordinator of Medical Embryology in the Department of Cell Biology, School of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington DC, USA.
He said the Koran described human development and commingling of the gametes through organogenesis. He said nothing in history has seen such a feat besides current day science.
6) Alfred Kroner
Professor of the Department of Geosciences, University of Mainz, Germany.
He talked about the origin of the universe and how it would be impossible for a man like Prophet Muhammad to know about this from his own mind. He said science today proves what the prophet said 1400 years ago.
7)Yushidi Kusan
Director of the Tokyo Observatory, Tokyo, Japan.
He talks about astronomy and using telescopes. He said that the Quran has true facts about astronomy.
8)Professor Armstrong
Professor Armstrong works for NASA and is also Professor of Astronomy, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.
He was amazed by what the Quran says about astronomy and how the ancient writing of the Quran agrees with modern science today.
9)William Hay
Professor of Oceanography, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
He was very interested how this information in the Quran could have this science in it and that it must be from God.
10) Durja Rao
Professor of Marine Geology teaching at King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
He said that the Quran could not be simple human knowledge and must be from a Supernatural Force.
11) Professor Siaveda
Professor of Marine Geology, Japan.
He said the Quran is almost unbelievable and a very remarkable book.
12) Tejatat Tejasen
Chairman of the Department of Anatomy and is the former Dean of the faculty of Medicine, University of Chiang Mai, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
He said all the facts of science in the Quran can be scientifically proven today.
13) Dr. Maurice Bucaille
Born in 1920, former chief of the Surgical Clinic, University of Paris, has for a long time deeply interested in the correspondences between the teachings of the Holy Scriptures and modern secular knowledge.
He said it is impossible to explain how a book produced at the time of prophet Muhammad could contain ideas that have only been discovered today. How could a man know these facts without the slightest of error.
news-af.feednews.com/news/detail/f7fa9839105d4
Sure they are roughly same BS
I like your sense of humor. Not bad, not bad at all.
Ma Sha Allah! .. I never understood the probability theory as I did now as Dr. Zakir Naik explained it simply in this lecture 🤩
Now apply that theory to the atheist scientists that also get most of their statements right. What is the probability that Einstein could figure out nuclear physics? Well he was an atheist.
See how this theory of probability stops working in your favour once you look at all the people who are right about things, right now? It’s the scientists, not the theists.
@@barrywhite1770 Did you just ask what is the probability of 1 of the smartest human beings ever, figuring out "nuclear physics"? id say pretty high..
now you either have to accept that an illiterate man (the prophet pbuh) was 1 of the smartest human beings on earth, ever! or that he was given knowledge that is out of this world.
also, einstein wasn't an atheist. he was agnostic.
@@NsightToday well atheist depends on your definition of a god. Einstein was an atheist to most theistic versions of a “god”. I don’t think he believed in some being that changes the laws of physics on a personal whim like that depicted in the bible or Quran.
Sun standing still for a couple days would mean the earth suddenly stopped rotating. There is no way Einstein believed in such a god.
@@barrywhite1770 lmao your understand of the Islamic version of god is very flawed 😂
@@NsightToday Well I understand that the Islamic version of a god includes such things as inspiring people to narrate books, or caring about the sexual activity of humans. I find such a god unbelievable. The whole mythical fantasy of demons and angels etc. is equally unbelievable.
So because the Qur'an happens to have a few 'scientific' passages that hold true today, therefore God. Yeah okay.
Quarker do you want more evidence?
detailed ones maybe?
Beisan Qaddoura Yes, if it also supports the idea that God exists.
Quarker
Here is a few
Referring to the Sun and the Moon in the Qur'an, it is emphasized that each moves in a definite orbit.
"It is He Who created the night and the day, and the sun and the moon. They swim along, each in an orbit. "
(The Qur'an, 21:33)
It is mentioned in another verse, too, that the Sun is not static but moves in a definite orbit:
"And the sun runs to its resting place. That is the decree of the Almighty, the All-Knowing. "
(The Qur'an, 37:38)
These facts communicated in the Qur'an have been discovered by astronomical observations in our age. According to the calculations of experts on astronomy, the Sun is traveling at the enormous speed of 720,000 kilometers an hour in the direction of the star Vega in a particular orbit called the Solar Apex. This means that the sun travels roughly 17,280,000 kilometers a day. Along with the Sun, and all planets and satellites within the gravitational system of the Sun also travel the same distance. In addition, all the stars in the universe are in a similar planned motion
The Roundness of the Earth
"He has created the Heavens and the Earth for Truth. He wraps the night up in the day, and wraps the day up in the night."
(The Qur'an, 39:5)
In the Qur'an, the words used for describing the universe are quite remarkable. The Arabic word that is translated as "to wrap" in the above verse is "takwir". In English, it means "to make one thing lap over another, folded up as a garment that is laid away". (For instance, in Arabic dictionaries this word is used for the action of wrapping one thing around another, in the way that a turban is put on.)
The information given in the verse about the day and the night wrapping each other up includes accurate information about the shape of the world. This can be true only if the earth is round. This means that in the Qur'an, which was revealed in the 7th century, the roundness of the world was hinted at.
It should be remembered, however, that the understanding of astronomy of the time perceived the world differently. It was then thought that the world was a flat plane and all scientific calculations and explanations were based on this belief. The verses of the Qur'an, however, include information that we have learned only in the past century. Since the Qur'an is God's word, the most correct words were used in it when it comes to describing the universe.
Quarker
The Pairs in Creation
Glory be to Him Who created all the pairs: from what the earth produces and from themselves and from things unknown to them."
(The Qur'an, 37:36)
Although the concept of ''pair'' or "couple" commonly stands for male and female, the statement of ''from things unknown to them'' has wider implications. Today, one of the implications of the verse has been revealed. The British scientist Paul Dirac, who proposed that matter is created in pairs, was awarded the Nobel Prize for physics in 1933. This discovery, called ''parité'', maintains that matter is paired with its opposite: anti-matter. Anti-matter carries the opposite properties to matter. For instance, as opposed to matter, the electron of anti-matter is positively charged and its protons are negatively charged. This fact is stated in a scientific source in this way:
"...every particle has its antiparticle of opposite charge… …and the uncertainty relation tells us that pair creation and pair annihilation happen in the vacuum at all times, in all places."
Quarker
Except that the book doesn't say the moon is reflected light, and it doesn't say the earth is a sphere. I also have no idea why he thinks anyone would say smoke in answer to that particular question he asks. He is a smooth talker, but he's still making invalid assumptions, and outright wrong about what his book teaches to boot. He's the best religious speaker I have ever heard, but it doesn't matter when the religion, like all others, is a fiction.
One day we will find out who was right and who was wrong
And there must be a lot of other scientific facts written in Koran, which the scientists have not yet discovered. Please reveal them also, a lot of effort of scientists will be spared. Or you are waiting for scientists to discover new things and then retrospectively say...... oh! thats already written in Koran!!
first of all. stop idol worshiping. bcz idols are non-living and man made. it cant be a God. second of all, no other scriptures have all the scientific things mentioned 100% correct other than Quran. and thirdly, whether u prove science(right or wrong) by picking and analyzing a verse of Quran or,you choose to discover a new science to prove Quran(right or wrong) the result will be the same. So it doesn't really matter who discovers the science first, whether by the Muslims or the scientists...it doesn't really matter. If Quran is right, accept it. If wrong, then don't.