BBC Inside Out Aylesbury estate - 8th Sep 2014

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 32

  • @barrychuckle2190
    @barrychuckle2190 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Seen as they’re going to knock down their property then why can’t they allow them to own one of the new properties.

  • @thornbird6768
    @thornbird6768 7 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    Same thing happening all over the country , yes these estates need regeneration but compulsory purchase is just stealing !!!

  • @sugarpuff2978
    @sugarpuff2978 5 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    My family were all born and bred in London. They all moved out in the last few decades. London will always be their home but there is no way they could afford to go back even if they wanted too.

    • @julieling1212
      @julieling1212 ปีที่แล้ว

      I now what Southwick Council are like hope u get u problem sorted out it make me whst to cry what u going through

  • @HaggisMuncher-69-420
    @HaggisMuncher-69-420 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    "We're going to force you to sell your house to us but we also get to tell you how much we have to pay you"

  • @pyellard3013
    @pyellard3013 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I can understand that the Council valuation might be lower than private surveyors... But 50% less? Isn't there any independent appeal?

  • @ponente61
    @ponente61 9 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Also, there are 74,000 EMPTY BUILDINGS in London alone, did you know that? Something is very wrong....

    • @JT29501
      @JT29501 ปีที่แล้ว

      For such a large city, the unoccupied buildings rate in London is actually extremely low. If you compare it to other cities around the world it's one of the lowest. It's also one of the most expensive cities in the world. That's not a coincidence!

  • @SI-cd7xs
    @SI-cd7xs 9 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    same thing going on in hackney. councils & government working together with property developers, us londoners don't matter.

  • @yuglesstube
    @yuglesstube ปีที่แล้ว +4

    If they must resume these buildings thats ok. But the absolutely must pay the owners the full market value, ans a bit extra to compensate for the inconvenience.

  • @ponente61
    @ponente61 9 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Also, since the Right To Buy scheme was introduced, 5 MILLION council flats have been sold off in Britain. Is this how we solve the housing crisis?

    • @pyellard3013
      @pyellard3013 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Those 5 million are people's homes.. 'Renationalise' them and you have to house that 5 million. The ONLYway to slove the housing crisis is to build more homes.. It doesn't matter if those xtra homes are private or council. Build enough private homes and private rents will drop to council levels. Build enough Council homes and private rents will drop...

  • @rbr2023
    @rbr2023 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    “They are being offered market value” yeah right…..who from? a time travelling estate agent from the late 80’s. Disgusting

  • @petermillist3779
    @petermillist3779 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Southwark Council - hopeless. Put up with them for 40 years!

  • @Brandon579JB
    @Brandon579JB ปีที่แล้ว +2

    God dam 300k in 2014,I wonder how much it is now

  • @Azyden_
    @Azyden_ 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I used to live there that was my old house

  • @glenfordburrell1076
    @glenfordburrell1076 ปีที่แล้ว

    In London, the value of a property can differ vastly even if identical buildings are on the same street.
    My cousin's terrace is in Lambeth, and his pal's identical terrace is across the road in Wandsworth and worth a staggering £120,000 more in value.
    The same can also be for identical properties in the same London Borough, with both properties having different post codes.
    Such is a problem with properties in North London - especially in areas such as Kilburn and its adjacent West Hamstead.
    The modern new builds replacing the Aylesbury estate are crappy timber framed dwellings - nothing in comparison to the Hardy steel and concrete structure of the old estate.
    We are plagued with such timber frame buildings here in Pimlico. Within five years of construction, these buildings are surrounded by scaffolding.
    Opposite the Blue Cross is a privately built block that is looking drab and is forming cracks on its exterior where the walls between each apartment are so thin that one can hear their neighbours arguing. This building was only completed in 1997!
    I would give an arm and a leg to be able to live in the Aylesbury. The size of each apartment are massive in comparison to other apartments in and near central London.
    Inner London Boroughs severely under value their their estates. They are worth a fortune.
    Middle class families - especially from Hong Kong, Malaysia, and even Kuwait would have no problems purchasing such properties even in their dilapidated state. Part of the Aylesbury could be easily sold off and the proceeds could be used to refurbish the other remaining council owned properties.
    A Middle - Eastern property consortium would purchase the Aylesbury at the drop of a hat!

  • @lilmizzije
    @lilmizzije 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    To think that i used to live 3 minutes away from there🤯

  • @BobMonty99
    @BobMonty99 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The clue is in the title . Right to buy scheme .. if I knock on your door and ask u to finance my latest scheme or scam would you help me ?

    • @Isleofskye
      @Isleofskye ปีที่แล้ว

      I wish that I had seen this 5 years ago as I would have helped you.

  • @AuntyM66
    @AuntyM66 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thats why i won't buy.

    • @Isleofskye
      @Isleofskye ปีที่แล้ว

      But you will rent all your life and have no property to pass in..

  • @MrMystri
    @MrMystri 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Heygate and Aylesbury were an absolute dump, Who in their right mind would think of buying property there?