"If you run out of balls in your reserve, then you pass and watch your opponent win by casually placing the rest of his balls and completing the pyramid."
So basically the objective of the game is to not to be the first to run out of balls, either by moving a ball you already have in play, or by removing up to 2 balls by completing your own square.
I have played and analyzed the game so that the round would not lead to a draw. My own variant is the "Drop move " rule in subtracting and have your piece/s get back from your resources.This is the rule: If you place a piece and make a square or 4 & 3 in a row (advance move) You must eliminate only the piece/s that is legal or not blocked but you must not eliminate your turn move that has been played, you can eliminate that after your turn again. And if there is a block on your pieces after you create that subtracting figure (square of 4/ 4&3 in a row), you can't eliminate the piece, and pass your turn. Try also to add intensity and excitement through the game by using game timers (chess clock). Kudos for this game because this is my appetizer game before playing aggressive games like Backgammon, Abalone, Carcassonne, Quoridor, Quarto, Pentago, Othello, Domination(Focus) and many abstract strategy games
I saw that too. The end result is the same since the top one fell into the hole he just made. You could look at it either way: (a) There's no restriction on how he takes the top sphere, so removing it by making a hole it falls into is ok since we can see the end result is the same, or (b) He took a sphere illegally, thus making another sphere fall, and where that other sphere falls doesn't change it.
![CAMPปลิ้น | EP.83[1/2] เปิดแคมป์หลอนต้อนรับ 2 ตัวพ่อแห่งวงการผี!](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/2uPuHYHgwiI/mqdefault.jpg)
"If you run out of balls in your reserve, then you pass and watch your opponent win by casually placing the rest of his balls and completing the pyramid."
So basically the objective of the game is to not to be the first to run out of balls, either by moving a ball you already have in play, or by removing up to 2 balls by completing your own square.
this game is really sus
@@Riciliz lmao
Balls
I accidentally say "Let's play pyros" to my brother instead of "Let's play pylos" and now my house is on fire
Just get the water.
Bruh
Get in the shower
Instructions unclear
Just call the fire station and they will come to your house to stop the fire.
I have played and analyzed the game so that the round would not lead to a draw. My own variant is the "Drop move " rule in subtracting and have your piece/s get back from your resources.This is the rule: If you place a piece and make a square or 4 & 3 in a row (advance move) You must eliminate only the piece/s that is legal or not blocked but you must not eliminate your turn move that has been played, you can eliminate that after your turn again. And if there is a block on your pieces after you create that subtracting figure (square of 4/ 4&3 in a row), you can't eliminate the piece, and pass your turn. Try also to add intensity and excitement through the game by using game timers (chess clock). Kudos for this game because this is my appetizer game before playing aggressive games like Backgammon, Abalone, Carcassonne, Quoridor, Quarto, Pentago, Othello, Domination(Focus) and many abstract strategy games
1:00 The move here is technically allowed since it's the same as taking the one on top
I saw that too. The end result is the same since the top one fell into the hole he just made. You could look at it either way:
(a) There's no restriction on how he takes the top sphere, so removing it by making a hole it falls into is ok since we can see the end result is the same, or
(b) He took a sphere illegally, thus making another sphere fall, and where that other sphere falls doesn't change it.
would've definitely been better if he had the other color ball fall into the hole to demonstrate the rule.
So basically it was a technical violation that didn’t affect anything and would almost certainly be ignored in an actual game.
It's not "technically" allowed, it just might be practically allowable, because it _happens_ to not matter regarding the end result _in this case._
Unless the balls were opposite colors.
Such simple design, but looks great!
You must construct additional pylos.
I now know how to play this! Thx!
So the goal is like in Dr. Nim or the last coin puzzle. Manipulate your way into playing the last turn to win.
I love abstract games and I have a video showing a version of this game made with caps (a homemade version)
never heard of this! gonna check out ur channel
Really watching!!! Go get those games!!
The first comment is never the “first comment, the “first” comment is never the first comment
This comment real
Great game! Thanks!
Nice explanation, thanks :)
hey bro i was wondering if you can review a game called periodic just that and if you do thanks bro
Hope you secure an Egyptian Senet board game, and also Mad Magazine the Board Game too. 😉
It's kind of like Nine Men's Morris
That packaging looks delicious, ngl
Lol Pylos I went there this summer
my opinion of the game gone from oh just a pure luck game to square tic tac toe
why does the box art looks like food
i'm genuinely happy that you said "the lighter colour" instesd of orange or yellow. accidental(?) colourblindness inclusivity?
I'm guessing that, as in chess, the actual colour of pieces can vary, but one will always be lighter than the other.
Let’s play pylos!
Oranges and lemons, but you can remove things from the board.
Request: how to play ore-o
This looks like a spherical version of Jenga
Nope. It's made of wood. That's about all they have in common.
Wait... Wood... A witch !
In other words you have to be the last turn to win.
Where is how to play yu gi oh
looks yummy 🤤
0:58 realises that you can do an infinite sphere reserve glitch
The other player would block it.
933 Grady Rue
People will try to eat this. They look exactly like chocolates.
When was that game invented”?
Bruh
Balls
More like "Pyros".
seems like hasbro rebranded itselt
What?
🧐