Dispute over sign posted at Crescent Beach heats up in Cape Elizabeth

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 ต.ค. 2024
  • The Sprague Corporation leases 100 acres of the beach to the state for public use, reserving the rest as private property. Some are questioning a sign's legality.

ความคิดเห็น • 83

  • @craignedoff991
    @craignedoff991 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +47

    Mainers, don't give these faceless, soulless entities an inch, or you'll be like Maui, where the rich are closing off the beaches to the citizenry.

    • @Gfysimpletons
      @Gfysimpletons 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      😂😂😂 they are the very rich you are referring to!

    • @marthabonelli3093
      @marthabonelli3093 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Right on.

    • @BillyAu
      @BillyAu 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They want it all and they want it now!

    • @davidkermes376
      @davidkermes376 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      barbra striesand has been doing it for years to the public shoreline in front of her pacific coast beach house. .she's a STAR, so she has more rights than the plebs!

  • @ms200036
    @ms200036 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    Wealthy land owners all across the country do this repeatedly. Penalties for actions like this should increase to act as a deterrence to others considering similar actions.

  • @mike_w-tw6jd
    @mike_w-tw6jd 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    Even if they claim that it's not their sign, will they be forced to take down the fence?

  • @BluntedZephyr
    @BluntedZephyr 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    I'm in Canada. 'Rich muppets' started buying waterfront and tried building a fence, proclaiming they owned fifty+ feet into the water. One of the locals, with a 100+ other locals cheering him on took a chainsaw to that fence.

  • @hotttt28
    @hotttt28 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Take that fence down

  • @MLSPlatforms
    @MLSPlatforms 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Put your own sign up ! All welcome

  • @user-ii3vn8tn3q
    @user-ii3vn8tn3q 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Ocean beaches are public. Thats federal law

    • @user-ii3vn8tn3q
      @user-ii3vn8tn3q 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      FEDERAL

    • @mikepalmer1971
      @mikepalmer1971 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Guess again.

    • @richdiddens4059
      @richdiddens4059 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@mikepalmer1971 CFR33 section 328.4-b-1 states the beach up to the high tide mark the beach is considered "waters of the United States" and is under the jurisdiction of the Corp of Engineers. Most seaside states, including Maine, say private property ends at the "mean high tide mark". Often the meaning period is 20 years. So that translates to being a point on the beach where 7300 of the most recent 14,600 high tides being higher than that point and an equal number being lower. So to determine that point on any particular piece of beach you have to produce a lot of recorded measurements. And as the beach slope changes 20 yards away you may need a different set of measurements.

    • @suedenim9208
      @suedenim9208 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@richdiddens4059 So you don't understand what "water" is? It doesn't seem confusing to me, but you do you.

  • @mizb.7777
    @mizb.7777 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    No coastline is private ….

    • @2pugman
      @2pugman 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      In NJ, the beaches are private for the most part, but we are allowed to walk on the "wet" tide line.

    • @Bigrignohio
      @Bigrignohio 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Then you will demand the gov refunds all the property taxes?

    • @keithduvall812
      @keithduvall812 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@2pugmanState Supreme Court decisions say the public is entitled to the beaches at the mean high water mark, which is the point where the wet sand meets the dry, as well as to some of the dry sand above the line.

    • @jeffhays1968
      @jeffhays1968 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Bigrignohio the funny thing is this land is not taxed.

    • @suedenim9208
      @suedenim9208 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Except of course for the property above the high tide mark, and out to the low tide mark in Maine and Massachusetts, where the property above the high tide is privately owned.

  • @veramae4098
    @veramae4098 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    That's true even in Michigan. We don't have tides, but the area the waves reach is public.

  • @walterholder6077
    @walterholder6077 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This bull was tried on the island of Trinidad but was quickly shown that all beaches are public and can't be owned

  • @johnmichaeltracy9050
    @johnmichaeltracy9050 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    take the fence down, its not an owned beach, army corps of engineers own the property, free for all citizens to use. this corporation put that fence there, thats clear, remove it. if they are protecting their land then they can put a fence up at their property line, far back from the beach area. the sprague corporation does not own the beach. start checking accounts of the local government officials.

    • @Bigrignohio
      @Bigrignohio 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not an owned beach? So the company does not pay property tax on it? Just curious.

    • @jeffhays1968
      @jeffhays1968 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Bigrignohio most likely they do not, every time I have checked they pay to high water only.

    • @suedenim9208
      @suedenim9208 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If the Sprague Corporation owns the land above the high tide mark then they very definitely, and clearly, own the land out to the low tide mark because that's how coastal property ownership works in Maine (and Massachusetts). Any chance you think the Army Corp owns it because you don't understand what "water" means?

    • @suedenim9208
      @suedenim9208 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jeffhays1968 Can you show us any example of a property tax bill that itemizes the taxes for different parts of a single parcel based on varying uses or characteristics of parts of the parcel? In the world most people live in each parcel has a value and a related tax bill and that's it. There's absolutely no question that the owner of a parcel abutting the high tide mark owns the property out to the low tide mark.

    • @nicepokerface3465
      @nicepokerface3465 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@suedenim9208can you show where private property stops at the beach or does it extend into the ocean indefinitely

  • @Nikoli420
    @Nikoli420 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    so funny that i did not hear a single Mainer accent in that entire video...

  • @fisherman5845
    @fisherman5845 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Someone from Massachusetts owns that beach no Mainers allowed

    • @mizb.7777
      @mizb.7777 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Nope you can’t own a beach in Maine… the end

    • @mizb.7777
      @mizb.7777 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      No you cannot own a beach in Maine it’s the law

    • @flyinpolack6633
      @flyinpolack6633 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Exactly what I Thought!

    • @adamsilberman9377
      @adamsilberman9377 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mizb.7777you are TOO funny. From low tide to high tide that doesnt include the entire beach

    • @suedenim9208
      @suedenim9208 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mizb.7777 If you pull your head out of your ass you might find that it's extremely easy to find out what the law actually is, and it's extremely clear and well-established that private ownership extends over the intertidal zone to the low tide line in Maine.

  • @edsalinas9996
    @edsalinas9996 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Maine, here in California, we practice "Imminent domain". The State just takes over the land. Period!

    • @suedenim9208
      @suedenim9208 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      In all 50 states, and the territories and other possessions of the US, they follow a little thing called the 5th amendment. It's not very long so you might consider reading it some day.

  • @williamdrake2315
    @williamdrake2315 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    That sign looks pretty weathered. It has been there a while.

    • @Bill-im6nt
      @Bill-im6nt 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Being under salt water can do that!

  • @luke_skywanker7643
    @luke_skywanker7643 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    They can do whatever they want up to the tide line. And that's the Mean High High Tide, too.

  • @jewelweed5375
    @jewelweed5375 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    So don't use taxpayers' money to fix beach erosion. From land to sea, all citizens should have access. No one should be able to block a beach/coastline. There should be no ownership of the coastline or beaches.

  • @philliplewis3754
    @philliplewis3754 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The rich snobs looking down the end of their noses at us! Why are we letting corporations buy all of our land! We the People

  • @williamwaha3193
    @williamwaha3193 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    In the State of Maine , ' Trespassing ' is to be considered Expected unless the Property Owner puts in measures to ensure against ' Trespass ' . The Law goes on to say what a Property Owner ' Must Do ' to be considered Legal . The State of Maine does have comprehensive ' Trespass ' Laws that Protect the Property Owners . Anyone concerned should look into the State of Maines Laws on Private Property Rights and the Right of Legal Trespass .

  • @pidginmac
    @pidginmac 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    All coast lines are public domain period. It is not possible to own a portion of ocean as a private citizen.

    • @suedenim9208
      @suedenim9208 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      In Maine (and Massachusetts) it's not only possible, but normal to own the intertidal lands between the high and low tide marks.

  • @davidkermes376
    @davidkermes376 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    tear down the fence up to the high water mark, too. .see who (if anybody) complains. .then charge THEM.

  • @stevenkirby7478
    @stevenkirby7478 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I am in no way on the side of landowners BUT let's face it, the public are slobs, they trash the beach and go merrily on their way. Need mmore enforcement activity re litterbugs.

  • @hippiehillape
    @hippiehillape 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Tale the sign and fence down, see who cries foul.
    Fish that zone DAILY, see who gets pissed.

  • @jamesdrake2378
    @jamesdrake2378 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    But it is not their land Mr. Town Official

  • @TheWhale45
    @TheWhale45 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There are no private beaches in the USA. even in Maui.

  • @Novastar.SaberCombat
    @Novastar.SaberCombat 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It must be posh to be so fixated on something so trivial. Some *other* people (probably far POORER folks) have legitimately serious issues to handle.

  • @jeffhays1968
    @jeffhays1968 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I pay no attention to these landowners. I can fish anywhere I like below the high water mark, dig clams, collect driftwood or metal detect the beach. I can be very unpleasant too.

  • @marthabonelli3093
    @marthabonelli3093 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    pole shift soon.

  • @briankenison7995
    @briankenison7995 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I go on so-called private beaches in Maine all the time.
    I just laugh.
    I love striper fishing

  • @thehubbleton
    @thehubbleton 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What are the laws about taking a dump on said property?

  • @SirDanimal
    @SirDanimal 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Sure, because of all the ppl going around putting up signs on other ppls property just for funsies. It could happen 😂

  • @thomcarr7021
    @thomcarr7021 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The sign and fence was probably installed by some random person with little to do.

    • @williamdrake2315
      @williamdrake2315 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@thomcarr7021 More likely someone with property there. I would take down the fence and sign.

    • @johnmichaeltracy9050
      @johnmichaeltracy9050 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      if you believe that then i have a bridge to sell you.

    • @cutiepiecatloveallanimals6602
      @cutiepiecatloveallanimals6602 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Your mom

  • @ronpearson998
    @ronpearson998 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ah, Obama?

    • @flyinpolack6633
      @flyinpolack6633 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      No kidding!

    • @hitman3531
      @hitman3531 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      th-cam.com/video/80BwqQQY31w/w-d-xo.htmlsi=WVsKUCTqpfvFwSxB