19th century, 61 years old when he passed, French, many works, and has this cute, lively waltz. Never heard of Talexy until about 2 minutes ago. Yet some people have the nerve to argue with me when I say "fame is not a marker for any one person's musicianship."
@@TheExarion I was really surprised to find this gem, it started vaguely interesting but got really creative and lovely in it's developments. just a fun piece
@@PianoScoreVids oh, sorry... As you said, it was "creative in its development". I thought you were referring to something specific perhaps. Thank you very much anyway.
@@sol999__6 imo, the beginning sets itself up to seem like a really harmonically simplistic moto perpetuo at first. Then, as the piece progresses, new textures/rhythms are explored, and the harmony - while not crazy complex or anything - is a bit more diverse than I personally expected. It becomes more fun but not in a formulaic way :)
The performance does not agree with the score at 2:28. In the last measure of the theme, the chord should be played on the third beat of the measure. Instead, it was played on the second beat. It may be better to play it on the second beat. I almost think so. But it is not what is written.
19th century, 61 years old when he passed, French, many works, and has this cute, lively waltz. Never heard of Talexy until about 2 minutes ago. Yet some people have the nerve to argue with me when I say "fame is not a marker for any one person's musicianship."
@@TheExarion I was really surprised to find this gem, it started vaguely interesting but got really creative and lovely in it's developments. just a fun piece
@@PianoScoreVids if you have the time and dont find the question inapropiated, can you elaborate your point? thanks!
@@sol999__6 I don't know what has to be elaborated. my point was just to say that it's a fun piece. I wasn't trying to really analyse this here
@@PianoScoreVids oh, sorry... As you said, it was "creative in its development". I thought you were referring to something specific perhaps. Thank you very much anyway.
@@sol999__6 imo, the beginning sets itself up to seem like a really harmonically simplistic moto perpetuo at first. Then, as the piece progresses, new textures/rhythms are explored, and the harmony - while not crazy complex or anything - is a bit more diverse than I personally expected. It becomes more fun but not in a formulaic way :)
Brilliant piece, brilliant performance 🎉 just amazing! Thank you very much ❤
I got vertigo while listening to this. LOL What a crazy, fast, little waltz! Loved every note of it. Well done!
@@AbandonedMines11 haha! the title sort of gave me the freedom to play this at this kind of crazy speed. was really fun to play this one.
BRAVO!! Encore, encore!
This composition is a great gift to your fans. Bravo!
What a wild whirl! Thanks.
Amazing performance!
Bravo!
Spectacular performance 🎹
@@lluisrafalessole-classical5068 thanks!
👍🎶🌟
Почти Полет шмеля😊
Alguna vez deberías buscar el Vals op8 nro 3 de Agustín Barrios versión piano, es de los valses más hermosos, te va a encantar
The performance does not agree with the score at 2:28. In the last measure of the theme, the chord should be played on the third beat of the measure. Instead, it was played on the second beat. It may be better to play it on the second beat. I almost think so. But it is not what is written.
i mean im waiting for your performance. this is a pretty hard piece.
@@PianoScoreVids ?
couln't you play a little faster ?.... just kidding 😀