Wonderful. Deals with things that have always bugged me about standard model physics -- time (entropic decay does not need time to be directional), fractional spins, lack of coherence and unification, and no proper concepts as to how things emerge naturally from an underlying principle. Not quite there if Higgs not dealt with, but that either means there is more to discover or that it just has not been worked out within the model. Still struggling to visualize this, but everything I understand fits nicely. This model is predictive and I am hoping that when the JWST comes online we get to see things that contradict the current standard model and fall in line with this model.
Thank you for asking. The Higgs field arises as follows [as per my present understanding of this theory. Further work is in progress]. The Lorentz-Weak part of the Lagrangian has a SU(2) X Sl(2,C) symmetry. This gives rise to the following exchange bosons: three for weak-isospin, one Lorentz boson [to-be-gravity] and the Higgs boson. My current understanding of the physical implications of the Lorentz-weak unification is limitied. I am working on it. There is a surprisingly large but not so-well known literature on gravi-weak unification. One thing I am certain about: the gravitational interaction and weak interaction are two different aspects of the same interaction. Exactly how, remains to be understood. Possibly, gravity is the large-scale limit of gravi-weak, and weak-interaction is small scale limit. This suggests a modification of the inverse-square law of gravitation on small scales. Lorentz invariance is a part [the 4-D aspect] of a larger symmetry of the octonionic space. The weak interaction part is related to spin, and the Lorentz part is as usual related to boosts and rotations.
Wonderful. Deals with things that have always bugged me about standard model physics -- time (entropic decay does not need time to be directional), fractional spins, lack of coherence and unification, and no proper concepts as to how things emerge naturally from an underlying principle. Not quite there if Higgs not dealt with, but that either means there is more to discover or that it just has not been worked out within the model. Still struggling to visualize this, but everything I understand fits nicely. This model is predictive and I am hoping that when the JWST comes online we get to see things that contradict the current standard model and fall in line with this model.
That's because time doesn't exist, it's just a tool in our heads to keep track of things, just like days
Is there a metric in the 8-dim space?
What physical principle gives conservation of C as defined in your talk?
What would be the origin of the Higgs Field under this theory? Can you say a bit more about Lorentz-Weak, motion and inertia?
Thank you for asking. The Higgs field arises as follows [as per my present understanding of this theory. Further work is in progress]. The Lorentz-Weak part of the Lagrangian has a SU(2) X Sl(2,C) symmetry. This gives rise to the following exchange bosons: three for weak-isospin, one Lorentz boson [to-be-gravity] and the Higgs boson. My current understanding of the physical implications of the Lorentz-weak unification is limitied. I am working on it. There is a surprisingly large but not so-well known literature on gravi-weak unification. One thing I am certain about: the gravitational interaction and weak interaction are two different aspects of the same interaction. Exactly how, remains to be understood. Possibly, gravity is the large-scale limit of gravi-weak, and weak-interaction is small scale limit. This suggests a modification of the inverse-square law of gravitation on small scales. Lorentz invariance is a part [the 4-D aspect] of a larger symmetry of the octonionic space. The weak interaction part is related to spin, and the Lorentz part is as usual related to boosts and rotations.
You blocked me
You have blocked me