many a player are passionate about Rashid and his games. but too many are so only coz of Agadmator. I remained in awe of his game after the period of fandom, because his plays what taught me to calculate and appreciate activity and potential above material. He is the best teacher.
@@josephisvr2947 its funny no? the title said "thats all you need to know", so you can just leave since you already got to know it from the title... am i just blabbering sh*t or does that make sense?
He is more aggressive than Tal. Tal even famously said his own favourite game wad the one he lost to Nezh in a game that I believe won a brilliancy prize. Agadmator has covered a lot of his games
Written in "Chess Openings For Black Explained" by Lev Alburt is a spectrum. The left most being least respect for material to the right meaning most respect for material. He has several people on each rung so I will use a number system here 1 being too little for material and 15 being too much respect for material Here it goes: 1. Nezhmetdinov ( out of spectrum, unhealthy disrespect for material) 2. Chigorin, Morphy, Shirazi ( left most of spectrum) 3. Marshall, Tal 4. Christiansen 5. Alekhine, Gulko, Denker 6. Bisguier 7. Alburt, Larsen 8. Fischer Geller 9. Kasparov ( just left of center in the spectrum) 10. Capablanca (just right of center in spectrum) 11. Larry Evans, Seirawan 12. Karpov, Steinitz 13. Petrosian ( Right most of spectrum) 14. Kortchnoi ( out of spectrum, unhealthy respect for pawns) Kortchnoi used to shout No!!!!! When people gave away pawns. "every pawn is a potential queen! Why you give away pawn? Why?!?!?" 😂
Nezhmetdinov was one of the greatest attacking chess players ever, it's ironic he didn't even attain the title of grandmaster, but he beat many of the best players of his generation
99.9 % accuracy? let stockfish 16 run this game on a modern computer for 3,5 hours, and i guess the accuracy will be lower. another reason why rashid got 100 % or 99 % accuracy, could be because rashid's opponent played bad.
Written in "Chess Openings For Black Explained" by Lev Alburt is a spectrum. The left most being least respect for material to the right meaning most respect for material. He has several people on each rung so I will use a number system here 1 being too little for material and 15 being too much respect for material Here it goes: 1. Nezhmetdinov ( out of spectrum, unhealthy disrespect for material) 2. Chigorin, Morphy, Shirazi ( left most of spectrum) 3. Marshall, Tal 4. Christiansen 5. Alekhine, Gulko, Denker 6. Bisguier 7. Alburt, Larsen 8. Fischer Geller 9. Kasparov ( just left of center in the spectrum) 10. Capablanca (just right of center in spectrum) 11. Larry Evans, Seirawan 12. Karpov, Steinitz 13. Petrosian ( Right most of spectrum) 14. Kortchnoi ( out of spectrum, unhealthy respect for pawns) Kortchnoi used to shout No!!!!! When people gave away pawns. "every pawn is a potential queen! Why you give away pawn? Why?!?!?" 😂
Except you study Petrosian games to learn how to sac exchange for win in the endgame, and centre of your scale should be around 7.5! :). Petrosian may have been the "World's strongest chicken" but that really just meant he did not go for unclear sacrifices. Also, Shirov and Kramnik should be on this list.
If there'd been a number 15, it would have to be Kermit Norris. He had two mottos: "No pawn respect!" and "Take care of your pawns, and the pieces will take care of themselves."
The game is from Nezhmetdinov's simultaneous exhibition that he performed in Kazan (Russia, USSR at that time), in 1951. The opponent's name is Lusikal.
Finding the moves one at a time is not the hard part, any 1000ish rated player could intuit most of Whites moves rather quickly since most were forcing. The problem comes with these knife edge sharp lines that you have sacrificed everything there is no inaccuracies, only blunders. For every possible Enemy move you have but One move that doesn’t immediately lose you the game. The problem is starting way back at the beginning you must exhaustively prove that every single line leads to checkmate. There may be well over 100+ moves branching from your move 1. You must prove before making that first move that every single move of dozens and dozens ALL lead to either checkmate or any obvious and overwhelming advantage. You must organize this all in your head, the whole time you’re clock is ticking down to 0
looking at the comments it's suprising to know not many people know about nezhmetdinov. Fun fact: He defeated Tal in 3 out of their 4 matches, and reached a peak elo of 2700 defeating multiple world champions and GMs like polugaevsky, smyslov, spassky, tal, etc. without ever being granted the GM status
@@bigrob0555 he wasn't shocked, if my memory serves, after one of their defeats tal stated that was either the best day or the best game of his life because if you watch nezhmetdinovs games, they're absolutely beautiful. Tal later took Rashid on his team for the upcoming candidates tournament and world championship, and their friendship lasted until his death.
@@ishan7126 yes that's a pure estimation because back then in his prime which was during 1940s-50s at max, russian athletes werent given freedom by the state to travel abroad to even the top of their athletes and GMs, let alone Rashid because albeit his strength, he was never allowed outside either. There was no way of establishing a strong FIDE rating for him for that matter and this is also why he never got a GM title, he was never allowed to play for GM norms in his peak and when the time did come, it was too late. He however did travel outside once with many strong russian IMs to europe when the journalists complained that the USSR only ever sends the strongest. Needless to say, Rashid crushed everyone he faced and finished 2nd by defeating the Italian Champion of the time and many more
@@samyadolai6574there’s always first things first, seldomly is being greedy it! Ever watch Point Break? They were good because they never got greedy. The one time they do, and what happens? Things got messy. What good is cleaning out the vault to never be able to spend it? In my uneducated opinion, that wave of waves wasn’t worth the loss of lives. Why did he unlock the cuff and give him that big wave? I analyze variables as I play. The Rook was never really free, it come with a cost. Even without a clock, chess is a race from the start.
he is focused on the only piece that matters, the king. this happens a lot, i'd be focusing and calculating my next moves trying to win material and defend, and out of no where, checkmate.
I mean, I don't think people really "find" mates with that many moves. Like, I paused and would've played the first 3 moves of that pattern just because they look favorable, and - when you reach that position - you can calculate the rest, and so on and so on.
he doesnt mean that this exact move is the hardest move to find in chess, he means a much more specific move known as moving the knight backwards as the knight is the trickiest piece to calculate in chess 😁😁
Polugaevsky beat Nezhmetdinov about ten times. (Few people if any aren't interested in that nor his losses.) But the game Nezhmetdinov beat him once and that game is an absolute immortal. In fact type just type in *Nezhm* and youtube will auto display in the third or fourth result Nezhmetdinov vs Polugaevsky. Yasser Seirawan does a very good presentation of that game. Nezhmetdinov, Rashid Gibiatovich is perhaps (my opinion) the most under-rated chess player ever. He didn't get the opportunity to become a GM but he won the Russian Chess Championship in 1950, 1951, 1953, 1957 and 1958. Nezhmetdinov was an absolute savage who could easily mate anyone's king.
Nazamaldinov was a brilliant attacker and still has , arguably, the best Queen sacrifice of all time. His insane calculations remind me of a nother great chess player less known by the young generation..the Bulgarian super GM and former world champion Veselin Topalov.
Such a beautiful game! I think I have fall in love with your content. Your content is pretty simple, but the analysis of the games and your pure interest on the games and chess makes your videos interesting and fun to watch. And I personally love chess, I play chess for fun, but I am learner, so I am also learning a lot from your videos! And I do want to see what playing against you will feel like.
@@caballitodetotora7087 I just looked it up, and maybe teacher isn't the right word. But they were good friends, Nezhmetdinov's chess inspired Tal, they played tons of friendly blitz against each other, and Nezhmetdinov was Tal's second when Tal played for the world championship.
This is an incredible video! Reguardless of the match you showed, you still explained it very well but still made it easily digestible for people of any skill level
11:10 This is what I'm talking about, this was extremely easy to find and you called it the hardest move to find in chess Edit: Now that I look back at it, I just spaced out and accidentally found that because I forgot at 9:23 you could take the rook. So I was a little wrong on how easy the mate was to find, great vid
4:40 - "A move, the engine didnt find"??? My Stockfish 15 immediately(!) suggested dxc6! with a whopping +4,36 calculation for white. Which poor engine does not find that move?
at 5:50 i really gotta appreciate the explanation of the brilliant move. the question, Why is it a great move? is missed by a lot of youtube chess tutors. Awesome and thank you!
I love videos like this. It's really interesting to watch. Maybe you could make a video on things that even pros at chess don't know. Could be interesting.
@@thechessnerd Yo, Chessnerd. 99.9 % accuracy? let stockfish 16 run this game on a modern computer for 3,5 hours, and i guess the accuracy will be lower.
When the king goes to f6, knight f7 would have been a faster forced mate. Discovered check by the bishop. Pawn blocks, then checkmate with bishop takes pawn.
Not gonna lie I literally predicted every(not every but most of including brilliant moves) move of White (I'm 1300 and So shocked that I saw every White's next move very casually)
@@RyanSmith-qh7srSome moves may appear obvious to people and non existent to others. For instance, the knight backward check was the first thing I thought when giving a check.
i'm glad i saw the checkmate in 1 without pausing, then attacks threatening mate in 3, it's crazy to think he gave advantage seeing these lines early on :O
There's bunch of fun (and not so fun) facts about Nezhmetdinov: - he was good in both chess and checkers - he was the first people in the world who was IM both in chess and checkers - he won many tournaments in USSR in chess, more than many grandmasters - it was calculated that he had 2706 ELO rating in early 1950's and was 21st chess player in the world - he never got grandmaster title Also there's opinion that he didn't got grandmaster title due to political reason (similar case was with Korhnoy)
I cannot find this game in the database but I can find the exact same moves attributed to Yusupov v Morenz 1981. Could you please check your sources - it smells extremely fishy. Also, the line with 9...Qxc3+ has been played by at least 2 GMs (Semen Dvoirys and Adrian Mihalcsin) since the Yusopov game with Dvoirys even getting a win with it at the 1994 Russian Championship.
The game is Rashid Nezhmetdinov vs Lusikal, 1951. I found it in the database. Interestingly, it was a simultaneous exhibition...Nezhmetdinov was playing multiple games.
The comment above mine is correct, this game was played in a simultaneous exhibition in Kazan, 1951. 0% fishy as this game is featured in his biography "Super Nezh"
![BOWKYLION - วิงวอน (ex-change) [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/cLdnZWDaO-w/mqdefault.jpg)
I Made 12 More Videos like this one for you: th-cam.com/video/Nnb6ALok2hw/w-d-xo.html
many a player are passionate about Rashid and his games. but too many are so only coz of Agadmator. I remained in awe of his game after the period of fandom, because his plays what taught me to calculate and appreciate activity and potential above material. He is the best teacher.
All we need to know is to NOT watch this video.
"He got 99.9% accuracy. That's all you need to know"
Ok bye
underrated
@randomuser3114 how? This is a serious question
@@josephisvr2947 its funny no? the title said "thats all you need to know", so you can just leave since you already got to know it from the title... am i just blabbering sh*t or does that make sense?
@@josephisvr2947title is right listen to it
bye.
I used to think Morphy was the most aggressive, then I found Tal. This guy might be even more extreme than both of them.
He is more aggressive than Tal. Tal even famously said his own favourite game wad the one he lost to Nezh in a game that I believe won a brilliancy prize. Agadmator has covered a lot of his games
I used to think tal was the most aggressive, then I found Martin.
Written in "Chess Openings For Black Explained" by Lev Alburt is a spectrum. The left most being least respect for material to the right meaning most respect for material. He has several people on each rung so I will use a number system here 1 being too little for material and 15 being too much respect for material
Here it goes:
1. Nezhmetdinov ( out of spectrum, unhealthy disrespect for material)
2. Chigorin, Morphy, Shirazi ( left most of spectrum)
3. Marshall, Tal
4. Christiansen
5. Alekhine, Gulko, Denker
6. Bisguier
7. Alburt, Larsen
8. Fischer Geller
9. Kasparov ( just left of center in the spectrum)
10. Capablanca (just right of center in spectrum)
11. Larry Evans, Seirawan
12. Karpov, Steinitz
13. Petrosian ( Right most of spectrum)
14. Kortchnoi ( out of spectrum, unhealthy respect for pawns)
Kortchnoi used to shout No!!!!! When people gave away pawns. "every pawn is a potential queen! Why you give away pawn? Why?!?!?"
😂
Rashid was actually Tal's teacher when he was young and I am not sure but probably also his second when he won the 1960 world championship
Yes
Nezhmetdinov was one of the greatest attacking chess players ever, it's ironic he didn't even attain the title of grandmaster, but he beat many of the best players of his generation
99.9 % accuracy? let stockfish 16 run this game on a modern computer for 3,5 hours, and i guess the accuracy will be lower.
another reason why rashid got 100 % or
99 % accuracy, could be because rashid's opponent played bad.
@@scottwarren4998what does this comment have to do with the original comment?
@@lucasolguin simple answer. no-one would see my little comment if i typed it elsewhere.
@@scottwarren4998 that's clever
cause of soviet bureaucracy
Written in "Chess Openings For Black Explained" by Lev Alburt is a spectrum. The left most being least respect for material to the right meaning most respect for material. He has several people on each rung so I will use a number system here 1 being too little for material and 15 being too much respect for material
Here it goes:
1. Nezhmetdinov ( out of spectrum, unhealthy disrespect for material)
2. Chigorin, Morphy, Shirazi ( left most of spectrum)
3. Marshall, Tal
4. Christiansen
5. Alekhine, Gulko, Denker
6. Bisguier
7. Alburt, Larsen
8. Fischer Geller
9. Kasparov ( just left of center in the spectrum)
10. Capablanca (just right of center in spectrum)
11. Larry Evans, Seirawan
12. Karpov, Steinitz
13. Petrosian ( Right most of spectrum)
14. Kortchnoi ( out of spectrum, unhealthy respect for pawns)
Kortchnoi used to shout No!!!!! When people gave away pawns. "every pawn is a potential queen! Why you give away pawn? Why?!?!?"
😂
"Korchnoi". Otherwise, great list.
Its best to be a capablanca,retain the material as potential ammo,but also give it away when its useful
Man it’s more fun to watch the left spectrum guys 😄
Except you study Petrosian games to learn how to sac exchange for win in the endgame, and centre of your scale should be around 7.5! :). Petrosian may have been the "World's strongest chicken" but that really just meant he did not go for unclear sacrifices. Also, Shirov and Kramnik should be on this list.
If there'd been a number 15, it would have to be Kermit Norris. He had two mottos:
"No pawn respect!"
and
"Take care of your pawns, and the pieces will take care of themselves."
“black’s queen is imprisoned while white’s queen is cheating on her husband”😂
Western countries problem😂
I don’t think it’s about chess anymore
NTR in chess
@@simranjit.singh1😂😂😂😂
@@simranjit.singh1no way 😭
His worst move was excellent 💀
and he only got 1/20 as excellent moves, i do aswell but thats because the other 19 are blunders
@@ObaidFaisalunderated bruh 😂
@@siddharthkumar9948 thank you
99,9% accuracy? Kramnik would’ve reported him for cheating
"Yeah, I mean this is ridiculous, let's check, yeah... 99.9% accuracy... Ok it's clear to me now, let's do the procedure."
The game is from Nezhmetdinov's simultaneous exhibition that he performed in Kazan (Russia, USSR at that time), in 1951. The opponent's name is Lusikal.
Thank you! This guy didn't mention who played black once during the game, it's my only criticism but it's kind of important.
Pssh more like Loosikal amirite
As a 900 rated player who lucky guessed every move in the 9-move mate like 2 seconds before you said it, this really boosted my self-esteem
Im 900 too but almost got every move right. Too many calculations at once mess my brain up
Finding the moves one at a time is not the hard part, any 1000ish rated player could intuit most of Whites moves rather quickly since most were forcing.
The problem comes with these knife edge sharp lines that you have sacrificed everything there is no inaccuracies, only blunders. For every possible Enemy move you have but One move that doesn’t immediately lose you the game.
The problem is starting way back at the beginning you must exhaustively prove that every single line leads to checkmate. There may be well over 100+ moves branching from your move 1. You must prove before making that first move that every single move of dozens and dozens ALL lead to either checkmate or any obvious and overwhelming advantage. You must organize this all in your head, the whole time you’re clock is ticking down to 0
Throughout this video I just kept saying: "I saw that but I didn't understand it".
Why are you guys lying though 😂😂, you can't be 1000 and below and find those that easily
@@kelvinmomanyi8850 no it wasnt easy, takes too much time but definitely possible
looking at the comments it's suprising to know not many people know about nezhmetdinov.
Fun fact: He defeated Tal in 3 out of their 4 matches, and reached a peak elo of 2700 defeating multiple world champions and GMs like polugaevsky, smyslov, spassky, tal, etc. without ever being granted the GM status
Tal was likely shocked that somebody was even more aggressive than him
bro shoulda been a gm goddamm i can't even get past 700 elo ☠
His peak rating wasn't 2700. 2706 was what Chessmetrics estimated his rating was at his peak. That's not the same as fide elo.
@@bigrob0555 he wasn't shocked, if my memory serves, after one of their defeats tal stated that was either the best day or the best game of his life because if you watch nezhmetdinovs games, they're absolutely beautiful. Tal later took Rashid on his team for the upcoming candidates tournament and world championship, and their friendship lasted until his death.
@@ishan7126 yes that's a pure estimation because back then in his prime which was during 1940s-50s at max, russian athletes werent given freedom by the state to travel abroad to even the top of their athletes and GMs, let alone Rashid because albeit his strength, he was never allowed outside either.
There was no way of establishing a strong FIDE rating for him for that matter and this is also why he never got a GM title, he was never allowed to play for GM norms in his peak and when the time did come, it was too late. He however did travel outside once with many strong russian IMs to europe when the journalists complained that the USSR only ever sends the strongest. Needless to say, Rashid crushed everyone he faced and finished 2nd by defeating the Italian Champion of the time and many more
The fact that the rook was hanging on h8 for like 15 moves 😆
Lol
Still he does not take it for respect his oppo
@@samyadolai6574there’s always first things first, seldomly is being greedy it! Ever watch Point Break? They were good because they never got greedy. The one time they do, and what happens? Things got messy. What good is cleaning out the vault to never be able to spend it? In my uneducated opinion, that wave of waves wasn’t worth the loss of lives. Why did he unlock the cuff and give him that big wave? I analyze variables as I play. The Rook was never really free, it come with a cost. Even without a clock, chess is a race from the start.
he is focused on the only piece that matters, the king. this happens a lot, i'd be focusing and calculating my next moves trying to win material and defend, and out of no where, checkmate.
This man didn't just sacrifice his pieces, he took his opponent's souls.
FInding a forced mate is 9 is still crazy to me.
I found a mate in 8 one time.
I mean, I don't think people really "find" mates with that many moves. Like, I paused and would've played the first 3 moves of that pattern just because they look favorable, and - when you reach that position - you can calculate the rest, and so on and so on.
@@memeityy when
@@abhishekvijay4921 In a game I was playing
Instead I find mate in 5
11:20 me as a 300 elo who guessed the "hardest move to find in chess": oh.
lol same
he doesnt mean that this exact move is the hardest move to find in chess, he means a much more specific move known as moving the knight backwards as the knight is the trickiest piece to calculate in chess 😁😁
I love aggressive chess so much it’s just so pure and exciting
It makes me so angry ha
Polugaevsky beat Nezhmetdinov about ten times. (Few people if any aren't interested in that nor his losses.)
But the game Nezhmetdinov beat him once and that game is an absolute immortal.
In fact type just type in *Nezhm* and youtube will auto display in the third or fourth result Nezhmetdinov vs Polugaevsky.
Yasser Seirawan does a very good presentation of that game.
Nezhmetdinov, Rashid Gibiatovich is perhaps (my opinion) the most under-rated chess player ever. He didn't get the opportunity to become a GM but he won the Russian Chess Championship in 1950, 1951, 1953, 1957 and 1958.
Nezhmetdinov was an absolute savage who could easily mate anyone's king.
"This queen is trapped, while the other queen is cheating on her husband". I maay have laughed a little too hard at this one.
I dont think anyone else ever played like Rashid. His existence belittles the title of Grandmaster.
Bro said the dude's excellent move was the WORST MOVE in the game. My best move are bpunders and inaccuracies 💀💀
A Nezmedtinov game to brighten your day.😊
Hello everyone!
Nazamaldinov was a brilliant attacker and still has , arguably, the best Queen sacrifice of all time.
His insane calculations remind me of a nother great chess player less known by the young generation..the Bulgarian super GM and former world champion Veselin Topalov.
Such a beautiful game! I think I have fall in love with your content. Your content is pretty simple, but the analysis of the games and your pure interest on the games and chess makes your videos interesting and fun to watch. And I personally love chess, I play chess for fun, but I am learner, so I am also learning a lot from your videos! And I do want to see what playing against you will feel like.
Thank you so much Daniel ❤️ I admire your words
I got 100 accuracy in a middle game review
Makes you wonder where that 0.1% inaccuracy came from
Came for the clickbait, stayed for the great commentary.
Knight going backwards check was the first one I found
11:46 pawn g4 checkmate… u left that one out there
99.9% accuracy of 0.1% of marginal error
i got 99.7 accuracy today with 1 brilliant move but THIS is TOO perfect to be true
Anything could be possiblw though
Bro, that was brutal. Into your channel here i jump mate. Great seasoning of commentary
My many thanks!
I love your energy when showing anything incredible... You can be a great commentator as well. ❤❤
thank you so much Digi ❤️
Reads title immediately closes video. Thats all i needed to know. Thank you
He was actually Tal's teacher, I think, so this insane attacking style is kinda expected. Brilliant player.
No way hahaha
@@caballitodetotora7087 I just looked it up, and maybe teacher isn't the right word. But they were good friends, Nezhmetdinov's chess inspired Tal, they played tons of friendly blitz against each other, and Nezhmetdinov was Tal's second when Tal played for the world championship.
@@grannywalter Yeah most people playing for WC brings gms as their second, and tal decided to bring madness itself
bro explained this game so good he answered all my questions unknowingly.
The video is 70% glazing, 10% analysis, 20% game
And your comment is 100% anonymous.
@@thechessnerdLMAOO SAVAGE
The backwards knight move didn't need all of that that but the rest was fine
@@flaowheel savage! ☝️🤓
@@thechessnerd ok chess nerd 😹😹😹
When he said kf3 was the hardest type move to spot in chess , i just lost it. Cuz I was thinking about that check
This is an incredible video! Reguardless of the match you showed, you still explained it very well but still made it easily digestible for people of any skill level
A piece of me died every time you called him "Nez". Brutal
God, someone who feels the same as me... -_-
Fun Fact - Most experienced players call him Nezh. Go into any chess club on the planet and ask who is
Nezh. You'll find he is well known.
The mate wasn't nearly as hard to find as you made it sound. That was literally the only thing I even considered
11:10 This is what I'm talking about, this was extremely easy to find and you called it the hardest move to find in chess
Edit: Now that I look back at it, I just spaced out and accidentally found that because I forgot at 9:23 you could take the rook. So I was a little wrong on how easy the mate was to find, great vid
12:06 liked that joke was very unsuspected thrown in there, video overall good quality and interesting
Where did the remaining 0.1% go?
Im no chess player but thank u to make it as understandable as possible
my mission!
I think Tal usually sacrifices two queens and a king for a checkmate.
Cannot stop watching if it is a video on Rashid's game! Like the way you described/analyzed the game. Subscribed your channel. Carry on :)
I wonder if when chess AIs get even better that the excellent becomes best move
2:24 f**king my king and my rook💀
it's forking not f**king
You are weird. I bet you are the kid nobody likes in school
Watching this video made me realize how absolutely incredible those moves are because thinking of all the possible outcomes is crazy!!
4:40 - "A move, the engine didnt find"??? My Stockfish 15 immediately(!) suggested dxc6! with a whopping +4,36 calculation for white. Which poor engine does not find that move?
An engine on depth 14 and not stockfish 15 obviously
When the opponent plays what you hoped they played:
Bro, 4:48 „the engine doesnt find“. I didnt prove it but hey, thats the most obvious move on the board. Come on. Dont talk trash.
bro did only 2 mistakes and 2 inaccuracies, that was harsh! imagine if he blundered
Levy would be proud
"Abandon all hope, ye rooks who enter here."
This guy was really a genius, and there is another amazing video with his history here in youtube
i just did an partyanalysis (idk why) and it turns out on engine depth 99 its 100.0 accuracy
why does this even have so many likes?
this is crazy, could you send us some screenshot?
@@gbg3663 brotha how
@@gbg3663 how should i do that???
well youtube of course do not accept direct images so itd need to be hosted on a link but no need to bother about that, thanks anyway!
This guy has 2 brilliants in one game and i get happy when i only blunder once 😭
What did the computer estimate whites playing strength to be? Great video btw!
I've found pgn online, when analyzed it said 2800 for white and 2100 for black
@@bedic96 lol
actually the mate in 9 wasent that hard to find though the middle game did hurt my brain
Man that was one of the best games I've seen played. It was so bold and clean from white. The commentary was also S tier. Loved everything about this
“Giga chad king” got me rolling 😂🤣😆
It's surprising i found the mate in 9 myself being 1100, lucky day for me :))
Lies
@@poornachandra5549 not gonna fight over -_-
Damn, must've took very long tho
My friend is close to his IM norm even he couldnt get it right ....and you being 1100 getting it right is like saying you eat GMs for breakfast
@@poornachandra5549 maybe he was having a bad day (in chess)
at 5:50 i really gotta appreciate the explanation of the brilliant move. the question, Why is it a great move? is missed by a lot of youtube chess tutors. Awesome and thank you!
4:25 my engine actually suggest that move
What depth was your engine on?
@@thechessnerd 16 but on 14 it also shows pawn takes
The fact i got a chess ad, makes this even more surreal
He saw a move Stockfish didn't see in 14 moves 😱💀
i can't take a game serious if my opponent gives up the knight to a pin like that, I'll pass to a higher level game
As a 1000 rated player who guessed almost every move this boosted my self esteem and chess confidence
You have huge potential if that was true. I'm 1400 and I think it takes around my level or more to figure these moves comfortably
Nez even frustrated Tal. Incredible attacker
MANY MANY thanks for showing this to the world, what a brilliancy!
10:40 Why not take the queen, then go back to f6? Nevermind.
If u didnt find it its 1 min later
@@petsimisthebest I foubd it ergo the nevermind
When i found the checkmate in 3 moves i was very happy until i saw rook rook d1 but then slowly started to find the moves 😂😂😂😂
11:16 "Hardest move to find" Ahem, i found that in less than 3 seconds.
12:26 no it wont
Nezhmetdinov is a truly sick man
I love videos like this. It's really interesting to watch. Maybe you could make a video on things that even pros at chess don't know. Could be interesting.
Of all recaps so far, this one was the closest to bringing me out of retirement.
Hey I like this guy! Nice video man.
Thank you!
the checkmate with the knight was like a fork
Bravo!! Great video all the way around, Zach!
Thanks Barry!! ❤
@@thechessnerd Yo, Chessnerd. 99.9 % accuracy? let stockfish 16 run this game on a modern computer for 3,5 hours, and i guess the accuracy will be lower.
When the king goes to f6, knight f7 would have been a faster forced mate. Discovered check by the bishop. Pawn blocks, then checkmate with bishop takes pawn.
Ke6
Not gonna lie I literally predicted every(not every but most of including brilliant moves) move of White (I'm 1300 and So shocked that I saw every White's next move very casually)
Nice sarcasm😂
@@RyanSmith-qh7sr I am serious dude tf😭💀
@@Saaakiv ha ha we supposed to believe a boomer's bald claims on internet
@@RyanSmith-qh7srSome moves may appear obvious to people and non existent to others. For instance, the knight backward check was the first thing I thought when giving a check.
i'm glad i saw the checkmate in 1 without pausing, then attacks threatening mate in 3, it's crazy to think he gave advantage seeing these lines early on :O
12:43 Bishop C1 Mate In one
RASHID is my all time favorite
10:39 why not go night f3???
Because e5 blocks the check and then the king can run away
@@timxgthen we can give block again with be5
"this is very hard to calculate" my 139 elo brain: nf3 and qb8
I had 100% accuracy once. I mated in 7 moves. It feels great, ngl
the engine says to keep tension with nf3 while nezhmetdinov cashs in by taking the knight, its the opposite of what you said
Great video,thx!
my pleasure, thank you for thanking me ❤️
Before knight f3..... there was a checkmate
I found the first 5 moves of the forced mate in 20 seconds 😮
So proud of you
There's bunch of fun (and not so fun) facts about Nezhmetdinov:
- he was good in both chess and checkers
- he was the first people in the world who was IM both in chess and checkers
- he won many tournaments in USSR in chess, more than many grandmasters
- it was calculated that he had 2706 ELO rating in early 1950's and was 21st chess player in the world
- he never got grandmaster title
Also there's opinion that he didn't got grandmaster title due to political reason (similar case was with Korhnoy)
0:45 qd7 is worst
That wouldn't be a reasonable move now would it?
thanks 😊
4 min 20 --- bishop c6 check (with queen follow up check) prevents castelling
I cannot find this game in the database but I can find the exact same moves attributed to Yusupov v Morenz 1981. Could you please check your sources - it smells extremely fishy. Also, the line with 9...Qxc3+ has been played by at least 2 GMs (Semen Dvoirys and Adrian Mihalcsin) since the Yusopov game with Dvoirys even getting a win with it at the 1994 Russian Championship.
The game is Rashid Nezhmetdinov vs Lusikal, 1951.
I found it in the database.
Interestingly, it was a simultaneous exhibition...Nezhmetdinov was playing multiple games.
The comment above mine is correct, this game was played in a simultaneous exhibition in Kazan, 1951.
0% fishy as this game is featured in his biography "Super Nezh"
he is probably the only guy that can beat tal, fischer, and morphy
your creativity in video editing is seriously impressive!
Thank you for so many likes.. even though i dont have likes
If the engine didn't find Dxc6 then i'm Stockfish 2000
Lev polugevesky Once asked how he defeated tal?He replayed that he trained With rashid.