When you select "only masked" and then set the resolution lower it's only using the lower resolution for the inpainted area. The reason the image overall still looks good is because it's the same resolution. Using a higher or lower resolution while inpainting a mask doesn't have any impact on anything other than the inpainted area. Using this you can actually get more detail in your inpainted area by maintaining the high resolution (either with 1x if using rescale-by or by manually typing a higher resolution) it will generate for example the face at the selected full-size resolution and then shrink the inpaint down to fit inside the overall resolution of the image.
Thank you for your insightful comment! You're absolutely right about how the 'only masked' function and resolution settings work in Automatic 1111. I must admit, there was a misunderstanding on my part regarding this. Your explanation is spot on and it's very helpful to me and, I'm sure, to other viewers as well. I will make sure to address this in a future video to correct this misunderstanding and to further enhance the learning experience for everyone. I truly appreciate your input and contribution to our community.
How do you make sure that you don't go too high in resolution and clash with the larger picture in amount of details? Is there a way to calculate the actual size of the selection? I'd be curious to use x/y/z plots for the whole process to save a lot of time.
But wouldn't the resolution make a difference to what result you get? Generating a 1024x1024 image gives you a different image compared to 512x512. So if he wanted to get something close to original as far as general image properties, it would make sense to do the inpainting at that original resolution. Unless it really doesn't matter in this particular case...
I got into stable diffusion last year and i had a lot of fun figuring out how everything works by myself. I'm pretty much self taught so i knew there would be some features i didn't know about so i thought i would finally look up how other people do their generations. Boy did i need to hear about the inpainting function. I knew what it was supposed to do but i could never figure out the specifics of how to get it to work. This is a major game changer for me! Thank you so much! I love the german accent by the way. You sound like a very friendly person.
I'm so glad to hear that the inpainting function has made such a difference for you! It's always rewarding to discover new features that enhance our creative process. Keep experimenting! Thanks for the remarks on my accent. 😊
I'm really glad to hear that you found the tips helpful! I strive to make my content as clear and informative as possible, so it's fantastic to know it's hitting the mark. Thanks for the kind words!
That's fantastic to hear! The AI-powered img2img upscale truly is a game-changer for revitalizing images. I'm thrilled it helped you save an image. Thanks for watching and sharing your success!
Wow, thank you so much for the high praise and for subscribing! I'm thrilled to hear that you found the tutorial to be so valuable. Your support means a lot, and it motivates me to keep creating high-quality content. Stay tuned for more AI insights and tutorials!
Thank you for your suggestion! The combination of controlnet tile and ultimate SD upscale is indeed a powerful technique for getting more detail. I have plans to cover this and other advanced techniques in an upcoming part II tutorial. Stay tuned for that, and I appreciate your input!
This video has some serious early 2010 movie maker vibes - you just know it's gonna be good and helpful!. And bam! I wasn't dissapointed - super precise & to the point. A complete workflow highlighting each step, thanks so much 👍 The german accent is just the cherry on top 🍒
Thank you for the fantastic feedback! Thrilled to hear the video hit the mark with my content. Your appreciation, especially for the German accent, brings a huge smile to my face! 🍒 Exciting news: the next video will also focus on a workflow, this time harnessing the power of ControlNet. Your support inspires me to keep creating. Don't miss out-thanks for being an awesome part of our community!
@@AIKnowledge2Go good to hear that I could put a smile on your face 😋 I’m totally excited for the next video as well! ControlNet is so far the one thing I haven't touched, but would love to know more about and slowly master.
I know this might get lost here, but, thank you, you really made my day, been a bit sad lately with life and everything and I just wanted to learn something new to keep myself occupied. With something. Just to not think about it all and produce art. You made that all possible. So thank you and I hope that you know that you made someone's life better.
I'm deeply touched by your words, and I'm so grateful to know that my videos have been able to provide you with some comfort and a positive distraction during this time. Life can be challenging, but remember that it's okay to take time for yourself and do something that brings you joy. The beauty of creating art is that it allows us to express ourselves, to lose ourselves in the process, and to make sense of our experiences. Never hesitate to reach out if you have any questions or just want to share your creations. Thank you for being a part of this community, and please take care of yourself.
Thank you so much for your kind words! I'm really glad to hear that you found the tutorial helpful and of high quality. It's comments like yours that motivate me to keep creating and sharing more content. Stay tuned for more tutorials!
Hello, could you please tell me how you enabled the bars on the side of your image on 4:16? The ones that let you pull the image up and down and to the sides. I can't find anywhere on how to enable them, for me images just get squeezed smaller and for really wide images that makes it so hard to work with.
Oh, those scroll bars were actually a result of using ctrl + mousewheel to zoom in on my browser. It appears that feature might have been changed or removed in newer versions. 😞 However, I'd recommend the canvas zoom extension for a1111. You can find it under extensions -> available -> load from, or check these direct links. haven't tried it myself but it seems to do what you are looking for: github.com/richrobber2/canvas-zoom Hope this helps!
Thank you for your kind words and subscribing. There's actually an improved version of this workflow you can find in this video th-cam.com/video/wyDRHRuHbAU/w-d-xo.html it uses control net so it's a little more advanced. Happy creating
To see the 'resize by' option, you may need to update your version of Automatic 1111. The latest version as of today is 1.3.2. I've confirmed that this feature isn't related to any extensions, as I still had access to it even after disabling all of my extensions. Please try updating your version.
The ideal computer for running Automatic1111 largely depends on your budget. If cost is not a concern, I would suggest going for a system with an Nvidia RTX 4090 graphics card and an Intel I7-9700K processor or faster. However, keep in mind that when it comes to running Automatic1111, the GPU and VRAM are significantly more important than the CPU.
How much was your computer? lol I mean, I'm utterly jealous by how fast yours works, and I don't know where to even start looking for good brands @@AIKnowledge2Go
Do you struggle with prompting? 🌟 Download a sneak peak of my prompt guide 🌟 No Membership needed: ⬇ Head over to my Patreon to grab your free copy now! ⬇ www.patreon.com/posts/sneak-peek-alert-90799508?Link&
Hi thanks for the feedback. if you need a more basic tutorial watch this video: th-cam.com/video/63Jn7Cn7Y4M/w-d-xo.html and once you are more advanced i suggest this one: th-cam.com/video/wyDRHRuHbAU/w-d-xo.html&lc=UgzNJLxlQ4IgEaFLjJ54AaABAg Happy creating.
I use Draw Things on my iPad and iPhone but even so this video has been very helpful! Your presentation is clear and simple, with no filler. Fantastic!
Draw Things is indeed a great piece of software. I'm thrilled that you found the video helpful and appreciate your kind words about the presentation. Thanks for taking the time to comment!
Thank you for your feedback! I'm glad to hear that you found the video informative and valuable. The next Video releases in a few minutes actually :) Stay tuned!
Thanks so much for your excitement about Part 2! 🌟 Your wait is over: th-cam.com/video/mrWmEWEZwDw/w-d-xo.html. Just a heads-up: since Parts I and II have been around for a bit, some of the settings might have changed. I'm planning to update them as soon as I can find a slot in my busy schedule. Stay tuned and happy creating! Your support means a lot! 🚀
Yes there is. Just change the prompt. In fact that is the reason why is have this little "spider thingy" on her leg, because i did not change the prompt. Happy Creating.
Wow man this is exactly what i was looking for this really helped a lot with learning a better work flow im making all kinds of crazy new images now keep up the good work liked and subbed.
Thank you so much for your enthusiastic feedback! I'm thrilled to hear that you found the workflow helpful and that it's inspiring you to create all sorts of new images. Your support really means a lot to me. Keep experimenting and creating, and stay tuned for more content. Thanks again for subscribing and liking!
@@AIKnowledge2Go I don't suppose you know of a good way to reproduce the same character. I know about LORAs but i am trying to generate multiple pictures of the same character that i can then turn into a LORA .... at least i think that's how it is done LOL im a noob :)
I'm sorry to hear that you're feeling overwhelmed. I'd suggest starting with my basic tutorial to build a foundation, then gradually progress from there. Here's the link to help you get started: th-cam.com/video/SHikMK39Q30/w-d-xo.html.
Hi yes it is. Maybe you want to use controlNet for this. Here is a newer version of this video. th-cam.com/video/wyDRHRuHbAU/w-d-xo.html To remove objects just write what you want to have instead on the background for prompt when inpainting. You need to experiment with the denoising strength.
with the same settings and just some changes to the negative prompt I was able to get much better faces, limbs, and less disfigured limbs with initial generation making the later inpainting much quicker.
You've made a great observation! This video primarily showcases this particular workflow. However, it's worth noting that when your prompts become more complex, or you're using multiple 'loras' as is often the case for creating stunning art in SD 1.5, the quality of faces tends to diminish. That’s exactly where this workflow proves to be incredibly useful.
One approach is to first generate an image without a person and then use inpainting to add the character. Alternatively, you could use a segmentation model in ControlNet to achieve this. If you're looking to remove the background from an existing image with a character, using an external background removal tool would be the way to go.
I'm thrilled to hear that this has reignited your interest in building virtual worlds! It's such a fascinating field with so much potential. I'm glad my content could be part of your renewed journey. Thanks for sharing your experience and happy world-building!
I've been tinkering with BlenderAI, Stable-Diffusion that works inside of the Blender modelling system. Blender renders a source image which is passed into Diffusion (along with animated prompts!) The Blender scenes (3d animations) are a great starting point, but I can see that using this work-flow is going to greatly improve my results. My current project is to 'convert' a short video clip into a nightmarish vision using BlenderAI to re-work frames of video. Being able to play with 'sliders' on a frame-by-frame basis is pretty wild!
While I can't provide specific content recommendations for NSFW topics, I suggest checking out Civitai for a wide range of models and resources. They have a diverse collection of AI models that can be used for various purposes, including complex objects. Maybe try combining poses with "complex objects" and experiment with the lora strengh.😉
Hi, Can you explain this please. why do you need to generate first set of images with Euler A? when you can use the DPM++ 2M KARAS in the first place. first set of images generated deformed faces. I do not understand what are the benefits of doing the additional steps? thanks
Hello! I appreciate your curiosity. The choice to start with Euler A isn't mandatory, it's more of a strategic move. Recently, I've been leaning more towards using DPM++ 2M Karras from the get-go. As for the additional steps, it comes down to the limitations and preferences in image resolutions. Stable Diffusion 1.5 typically restricts us to generating images at 768 x 512 or 512 x 768, and occasionally 768 x 768. I like to stretch those boundaries to achieve higher resolutions, like 2K or even 4K. By using the Image2Image upscale method, I feel I have a tighter grip on the upscaling process, compared to the highres fix workflow. Think of it like having a finer zoom lens for the details when you're aiming for that perfect shot in photography. It's about crafting the image with as much precision as possible. I hope this gives you a clearer picture of why those extra steps might be worth the effort!
Hello, thank you for pointing out the missing information about 'lora cyber'. I apologize for the oversight. I've now updated the description to include it. If you're unsure about how to use loras, I recommend checking out my video on using lorases and models: th-cam.com/video/IEYMVIbPbQQ/w-d-xo.html. I hope you find it helpful!
ich habe das Problem, dass sich bei mir Bilder trotz maskiertem Bereich verändern. Natürlich achte ich auf CFG-Scale und Denoising strength-Einstellungen. Und auch auf das "clear", wenn ich ein neues Bild rein lade oder den Tab wechsle, etc. Trotzdem kämpfe ich mit Änderungen im nicht maskierten Bereich. Auch dafür habe ich die richtigen Häkchen gesetzt, so wie in dieser oder in anderen Beschreibungen. Was kann man da verkehrt machen?
Hallo ich versuche mal nach bestem Wissen aus der Ferne zu helfen... Mit "Auch dafür habe ich die richtigen Häkchen gesetzt" ist gemeint das die Box "only masked" gesetzt ist, korrekt? Welche Version ist auf dem PC installiert? Evtl. hilft ein Upgrade. Die aktuellste version von A1111 ist 1.6. Ansonsten hilft vielleicht eine frische installation. Hoffe, das hilft!
@@AIKnowledge2Go vielen Dank für die Rückmeldung. Nächste Woche kommt der neue PC, da wird dann die Neuinstallation notwendig sein. Meine Onboard Grafik mit 4 GB ist einfach zu mickrig. In der Eingabeaufforderung wird auch beim Laden direkt etwas mit "fatal git" gemeldet. Da muss ich auch nochmal nach einem anderen Installer schauen. Den, den ich habe, der fragt mich gefühlt 1000 Dinge ab, da komme ich mir vor wie bei einer multiple choice Programmierer-Abschlussprüfung. Und was ich letztlich gemacht habe, wissen wohl nur Gott und Teufel... 😅
I'm glad to hear that tip was helpful for you! I dont know why this is not fixed already. Maybe one day i'll write a bug ticket in Automatic 1111 github on the other hand, this move has become second nature to me. So even if this bug is fixed one day i will clear the mask anyway. :) Thanks for watching and happy creating!.
When I upscale the image giving it 0.5 noise I get a worse image. It just ruins the image with a lot of random variations instead than a coherent image. Any idea why?
I'm really glad to hear that you found the tips and workflow helpful! Sharing this knowledge and helping others is exactly why I create these videos. Your support and feedback are much appreciated. Thank you!
Hi und danke für dein Feedback! Den Akzent bekomme ich einfach nicht raus 😂. Zum Glück scheinen ihn die meisten englischsprachigen Zuschauer eher amüsant als nervig zu finden.
I don't understand what I am doing wrong. When I am inpainting the face I follow your steps precisely and all my settings are the same as yours but I never get a new face on the image. I have tried inpainting other parts of the image and get the same results. I have tried changing all the settings individually just to get some change but nothing ever changes. All the images are output precisely the same as the original. What am I missing?
I'm sorry to hear that you're experiencing difficulties with generating new faces using the inpainting process. It's possible that there may be some issues with your installation or settings. Here are a few suggestions to troubleshoot the problem: Make sure that your Automatic 1111 software is up to date. The latest version as of now is 1.4.0. If you're using an older version, consider updating to the latest release. Double-check that all your settings match the ones shown in the tutorial video. Pay close attention to any specific prompts or parameters that are mentioned. Even a small difference in settings can affect the output. If possible, try generating images with different prompts or inputs to see if the issue persists. This can help determine whether the problem is specific to the face inpainting process or a more general issue. Consider performing a fresh install of Automatic 1111. Uninstall the current version, then download and install the latest version from the official source. This can help resolve any potential installation issues or conflicts. If you continue to experience difficulties, it may be helpful to seek assistance from the Automatic 1111 community or support channels. They may be able to provide more specific guidance based on your specific setup and issue.
I'm still having issues with hands even with this method, do you have any tips? Anything would work for me, like using an specific model. Context: I do semi-realistic and anime images. Edit: I managed to do it with another tutorial.
Ah, hands can indeed be tricky. When working with semi-realistic and anime images, consider using LORAs like badhands, badartis, or Unspeakable Horrors from Civitai. They can specifically help refine those details. Additionally, give ControlNet inpainting a shot, it's a great tool for correcting specific areas like hands. I use inpaint_only + llama often.
@@AIKnowledge2Go I tried before badhandv4 as a embedding but it is not working most of the time, I've been using inpaint too now that I know but I still have some issues. I guess it won't always work.
Hi again, I have some news. I watched another tutorial and I managed to get it to work as I wanted. Hands are still hard but most of the time it works enough for me, hands are usually fine and with some edition I can make it look perfect. Basically there are 2 important things: 1- Use a model that is good enough with hand generation. 2- Use the extension ADetailer. Optional: Use ControlNet too to let it know to the AI the position of the fingers. 3- Optional: Embeddings algo help and you can also use this "(badhandv4:1.5)" so you can force it to work harder.
Skipping layers can lead to variations in the generated images, potentially yielding results that are more aligned with your creative intent. Hope that helps.
@@Asterex versuchs mit negative embeddings wie z.b.civitai.com/models/116230/bad-hands-5 Ansonsten hat After Detailer auch die möglichkeit Hände zu "inpainten" zu after Deatiler hab ich auch ein Video. Allerdings ist da der Fokus auf Gesichtern.
Thank you for your enthusiasm! It's great to know you found the video helpful. I'm excited to continue creating more content for you and the community. Stay tuned for more!
I'm glad my antics gave you a chuckle! I admit, sometimes my attention wand... - "Oh, look a bird!"😂 Jokes aside, there was some re-recording involved in creating the video. When it came to editing, I figured it would be easier to add some explanatory text rather than reshoot everything again. Thanks for noticing and watching!
When you refering to refiner you mean SD XL Models right? Actually i havent done upscaling with it. My system crashes when i go higher than 1024 x 1024 with sdxl models. I still use a lot SD 1.5 because as of now in my opinion you can get better results with 1.5 if you know what you are doing.
Ha, you might have missed the first minute of my video where I go over the clip skip settings 😂 But no worries! Just go back and check that section.Happy to help!
hi there! thank you for the guide and tutorial. Very useful information especially to users like me that only know how to put in prompts and click generate. Thank you again!
You're very welcome! I'm glad to hear that you found the guide and tutorial helpful. It's always my aim to make the process of AI art generation more accessible and easy to understand. Don't hesitate to explore my other videos for more tips and tricks. Thank you for your kind words and support. Stay tuned for future videos!
I just got in to stable diffusion automatic 1111, installed it alongside one of the lates toturial I found on youtube but my Ui looks lsightly diffrent for example I dont have "restore face" :/ why? can anyone help me do I need to download some additional addon or what ?
Hey there! It seems like the "restore face" feature was relocated in version A1111 1.6. To get it back: Navigate to Settings -> User Interface. Under the Quicksettings list, choose face_restoration. Click on Apply Settings and then Reload UI. You should now see "Restore Faces" at the top of the page. If you'd like it to be a default feature: Go to Settings -> Restore Faces and enable it. Do note, if you've added it via Quicksettings, the description "Restore faces (will use a third-party model on generation result to reconstruct faces)" might not appear. Alternatively, consider using After Detailer. Here is a video about it: th-cam.com/video/y3DxX9s0NhQ/w-d-xo.html Hope this clears things up for you!
Great question! When you use the 'Send to Image 2 Image' feature, it automatically transfers the seed from txt2img to img2img. No need to paste it manually - it's all taken care of for you! 😊👍 Hope this helps, and happy creating!
Absolutely! Adetailer has been a game-changer. If you haven't seen it yet, check out my video on it; I delve into its benefits and how it can save you a lot of time. Cheers!
I never considered sending an initial image I like to img2img. I'll have to try that. I normally copy and paste the seed of an image I like and tweak settings from there.
I found it a bit more intuitive compared to the high res fix workflow and in my experience, it often led to better results. But the beauty of these tools is the flexibility they offer. Definitely give it a try and see how it works for you!
@@AIKnowledge2Go I have been trying this method, and I am amazed how much better this technique is. I get so much more detailed and hi-res results. Thank you for sharing this.
I'm sorry to hear you're having trouble with the User Interface settings. Could you please provide a bit more detail about the specific issue you're facing? Have you tried opening webui in another browser? firefox, chrome edge?
Good video and explanation! I'm just a bit confused about one thing, during inpainting is it really necessary to have an accurate prompt, for what you want specifically in that area? And what happens when you leave it blank, does it just try to "autofill"?
Hey there! Your prompt can guide the AI for better inpainting, but feel free to experiment and see what surprises the blank canvas brings! What i didn't do in my Video is to change the prompt. I actually should have changed it. Leaving it blank can work, but i suggest you use ControlNet Inpaint.
@@AIKnowledge2Go so if I downloaded and install it I can just put promt and it will generate 3d/anime art right(sorry I just pick up AI art) and also😅 how can I say take a human model and make it into 3D art??
for me, during the ImgToImg inpainting, if i render with "restore faces" on, the eyes always come out blurred and wonky. if i turn it off, the eyes are fine, but of course they are not "upgraded" like they are (in theory) when "restore faces" is turned on.
That's indeed an interesting behaviour. The image resolution could play a role in what you are experiencing. Or you have to many loras, Textual inversion etc. active. What you can try: I have a very handy video about Afterdetailer. It's an extension that can automate inpainting of faces and other body parts and produces great results. I didn't mention it in this video as I wanted to keep things simple. Here is the link to the Afterdetailer tutorial video: th-cam.com/video/y3DxX9s0NhQ/w-d-xo.html. It might give you some insights on how to achieve better results with face restoration.
Love this video. I mainly learn through TH-cam Vids, and I've been an avid Stable Diffusion user since the onset. Keep making content like this that explains your actions & choices, and I know you're gonna have tons of subs soon.
Thank you so much for your kind words and support! I'm thrilled to hear that you find the videos helpful. I will certainly continue to create content that explains my process in detail. Your feedback and encouragement mean a lot to me. Stay tuned for more content!
adding keywords for face tend to decrease chances of getting mangled faces you will have to fix later. Try (highly detailed face, textured skin, detailed eyes)
That's a great tip, thanks for sharing! However, it's also worth mentioning that there will come a time when you'll want to upscale your image to enhance the overall quality. In that case, you might still need to deal with some mangled features, but hopefully fewer with your suggested keywords.
Great question! It might seem super fast, but that's actually an illusion - I sped up the video for better engagement. The creation you saw was done with my old Nvidia 2080 Super. However, my current setup includes an Nvidia 4080 RTX and an Intel Core™ i9-13900K, which is indeed quite fast. To give you an idea, it can render 8 images at 512 x 768 resolution in about 35 to 40 seconds.
Thank you for your question. Personally, I enjoy exploring my artistic side with these tools. In fact, before the rise of ChatGPT and other AI models, I hadn't even considered myself to be an artist. While it might be tempting to sell the images generated by these models, it's important to note that most of them specifically prohibit selling the content or offering creation services, such as commissions. Always make sure to check and respect the terms of use for the models and tools you're using.
My 1080 can't upscale so much. Welp. But nice demonstration. That model is right up my alley. I hope the dev will resume maintaining it after his hiatus.
I understand your concerns with the 1080. To address the VRAM issue, you might want to try adding the `--lowVram` or `--medVram` parameters when starting with webui-user.batch. Another approach for upscaling with limited VRAM is to utilize Controlnet Tile. It essentially breaks your image into smaller tiles and scales each one separately. This can be especially helpful for hardware with memory limitations. Hope that helps
Where do I find the Controlnet Tile? I'm not ready to follow your tutorial yet cos my internet is being throttled and that file for the revAnimated model you suggested is taking hours to download :/@@AIKnowledge2Go
I see what you mean. It can be a bit tricky to understand. Depending on the Model and Loras you are using, the 'Restore Faces' option might work differently. I often prefer to use the 'inpaint faces' option or the After Detailer plugin. If you want a more in-depth explanation, you can check out my video on using the After Detailer plugin th-cam.com/video/y3DxX9s0NhQ/w-d-xo.html
I'm so glad to hear that the video was helpful for you! It's wonderful that you're now able to use the tool more effectively. Thanks for watching and happy creating!
First of all, a greeting and thanks for the video, a beautiful image. I wanted to ask you why you didn't use the High res fix, from what I understand what it does is the same as you did but saving you a step, that is, starting an imgtoimg process. What is the reason that you advise against its use?
Thank you for your comment and your kind words about the video. @hoasiai is spot on. The High Res Fix does indeed have the potential to significantly alter the image, as does changing the sampler. My preference is for a straightforward workflow. I start with prompt engineering, and once I'm satisfied with the composition, I move to Image2Image to boost the quality when changing the sampler, without affecting the composition. I hope this clarifies my approach, and thanks again for your question!
You're getting a hand and a robot thing in your leg in painting because it's still part of the original prompt. It's important to trim out portions that aren't applicable to what you're inpainting.
You're absolutely right. My skills in inpainting have improved since then. I'm considering re-recording this video in the future. Thanks for pointing that out, happy creating.
I would use it while inpainting. While this image has only one person, sometimes you want to create setups with multiple people. And masking out a face and writing the prompt for the face in After Detailer, or using a Lora/TI/Lycoris, can be helpful. I hope that helps you on your creative journey.
Dman this is very nice workflow , i usually use ad detailer to fix face from the start , and for upscaling i go to img2img and use tiling with ultimate upscaling. I dont know why....thats just the workflow ive had. Ill try this now
It's always interesting to hear about others' workflows! The beauty of these AI tools is that there are so many ways to use them. It sounds like you have a process that works well for you, which is fantastic. My workflow is just one way to approach creating AI art, and I encourage you to try it out and see if it suits your style. Thanks for watching and happy creating!
Hello @AIknowledge2Go, this is a really helpful video. Thank you for coming up wirh such a great content. I have a quick question here and would appreciate if you could provide some valuable suggestion. I have always been having challenge in worling with image2image generation, seems like the final result is no where close to my input image. For example, if I want to make minor edit to my normal human images like change clothes color, changing hairstyle, changing hairlength etc by keeping rest of the entire details intact should i go for image2image option in SD or should i use some other method for this? I am using absolutereality Checkpoint for this to ensure the pics are realistic. Any advise / suggestion would be greatly appreciated
Thank you for your kind words! If you want to make minor edits to your normal human images while keeping the rest of the details intact, using the inpaint option of Image2Image in Automatic 1111 is a good choice. However, for specific modifications like changing clothes color, hairstyle, or hair length, you may need to experiment with different prompts and parameters to achieve the desired results. In addition to Image2Image, you can also explore the ControlNet model for inpainting, as it can be effective in preserving the overall details while making specific modifications. Remember to adjust your prompt accordingly to focus on the areas you want to edit. It's important to experiment and iterate with different prompts, models, and parameters to achieve the desired outcome.
@@AIKnowledge2Go Thank you so much for your response . I totally agree , detailed prompt + config details are the key here, which I haven't mastered yet, still learning 🙂. Btw, if you don't mind me asking I would like to know if there is a way I can have a model trained to simply take input and change hairstyle on the same pic as output. Considering I have to work on multiple images, it would be difficult to keep writing prompt on each image to get the desired result. Thank you so much for looking into this 🙂
mehr als eindeutig du bist deutsch ^^ allerdings muss ich sagen es war schwer zu verstehen, was was wirklich macht. ich nutze easy Diffusion als web ui auf meinem poweredge r630. es war viel information gepackt in einem video allerdings hätte ich gern ein paar Beispiele gesehen. würde mich gern über eine video serie freuen die frei nach dem motte. lasst uns heute mal ein bild erstellen und dann vielleicht irgendwelche themen nehmen oder random ein paar worte zusammen werfen oder so. also quasi was man so als anfä´nger auch tun würde. wäre sicher interressant dich einfach mal bei dem prozess zu begleiten und auch deine hinter gründe zu hören wie und warum du das so jetzt machts. aber sehr informativ und hat mir schon ein ganzes stück weiter geholfen
Ha da hast du mich erwischt 😂 Deutscher durch und durch😂 Du hu hast absolut recht, das Video richtet sich auch eher an Leute die bereits Berührungspunkte mit Automatic 1111 hatten. Ich kann dir dieses Video von mir empfehlen da erkläre ich die einzelnen Settings: th-cam.com/video/SHikMK39Q30/w-d-xo.html Wenn du der Liste folgst da hab ich einzelne Themenbereiche in Reihenfolge abgedeckt. Ich hoffe das hilft dir weiter.
Good is indeed a subjective term when it comes to AI-generated art. It ultimately depends on what you're looking for in terms of balance between speed and output quality. For my workflow, I prefer to start with Euler A during the prompt engineering phase due to the specific characteristics it imparts to the generated images. Then, when it comes to upscaling, I switch to DPM++ 2M Karras due to its high level of quality in the results.
@@AIKnowledge2Go My thought process comes from the difference between SDE Karras and 2M Karras. SDE gives better quality but 2M has really good quality at half the speed. So I was wondering if I could go one more step down under 2M but I don’t think it’s possible. Somebody told me DDIM and yes it is faster than 2M by 1-2 seconds but that’s not a major difference and you sacrifice quality.
Do you have some source to adjust our research, a lot of parameters I've seen in this video, weren't showed anywhere, I assume part of it is emperical knowledge, still, if you can link us to great indept tutorial explan,ation it would save me a lot of hardwork ! Still I learn a ton from that video, and helped me adjust some issues i've got manytimes !
Your response is a good start, as it acknowledges the viewer's appreciation and seeks to clarify their specific needs. You could enhance it by offering direct links to your relevant videos and expressing a willingness to assist further. Here’s a revised version of your response: Hi there! I'm thrilled to hear that my video was informative and helpful for you. Regarding the settings you're curious about, could you specify which parameters or aspects you're looking into? This will help me guide you better. Also, I have two basic videos on prompting and basic settings on my channel which might be just what you're looking for. I'll drop the links here for easy access: th-cam.com/video/MftRapF4AaU/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/SHikMK39Q30/w-d-xo.html Feel free to check these out. Also i have whole tutorial Series on stable diffusion.
Hey, wirklich ein sehr gutes Tutorial, danke dafür. Ich habe noch ein Problem, vielleicht kannst du helfen: Wenn ich in InPaint einen bestimmten Bereich maskiert habe, sagen wir zum Beispiel die Beine, und dann auf generate drücke, macht er mir keine neuen Beine, sondern es sieht so aus, als würde er das komplette Bild noch mal in dem maskierten Bereich erstellen. Hab die Einstellungen aus dem Video übernommen und auch mit verschiedenen Noise Strength experimentiert.
Danke für das Feedback. Wenn er das oder ein ähnliches Bild noch einmal erzeugt in dem maskierten Bereich, hast die denoising strengh zu hoch. Was ich in dem Video nicht zeige (weil ich es damals nicht besser wusste) ist, das du dein Prompt anpassen sollst/kannst/musst. Wenn du z.b. ein Gesicht inpainten möchtest, dann schreib sowas wie "image of a face of..." was du im Prompt drin lassen sollest ist alles was das rendering betrifft (HDR, 4K, cinematic shot). Inpainten ist immer auch ein bisschen Trial and error. Hope that helps.
Nice video.. 1 question, when I try pinpointing do you need to change the prompt at all? I keep getting strange results, for example, I inpatient the face, but then I get a whole corrupt face, sometimes with bodies and all sorts of things in it. Any tips?
Thank you for your feedback. Regarding pinpointing, adjusting the prompt can often help in achieving the desired results. It sounds like the issue might be related to the denoising strength; consider reducing it. If you're having specific problems with faces, I recommend checking out my video on 'After Detailer'. This tool can realy make inpainting face effortless
Thank you so much for your kind words and support! I'm thrilled to hear you found the video helpful. Cheers to more learning and exploration together! 🍻
Great workflow as I had abandoned SD and came back after your video. I wanted to ask about two types of prompts you used, and . Whenever I generate and my terminal shows Could not find two Lora files. Where do you download from and how do you install it?
Thanks for your comment. These two are Loras, extensions that can be wielded on a variety of models. Links are below in my video description. If you're not sure about how to use Loras, I suggest you watch my video on this topic. It'll give you a detailed guide on how to download, install, and use them. Here's the link: th-cam.com/video/IEYMVIbPbQQ/w-d-xo.html
Hello, that's intriguing! It sounds like there might be something different in your setup. Could you double-check if you're using the same checkpoint I'm using? Additionally, it might be worth checking the console window to see if there are any error messages or unexpected outputs. Also, make sure your LoRa (Long Range Wide Area Network) settings are working correctly. These factors can often impact the kind of results you get. Let me know how it goes!
@@AIKnowledge2Go Yes, sorry, I've learned a lot since then and I understand better now. I certainly didn't have everything to install. Thanks for your answer
![Shoot EPIC MOVIES with this FREE AI Tool! [ComfyUI Tutorial + Free Workflow]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/gHI6PjTkBF4/mqdefault.jpg)
Checkout the 2025 version of this video: th-cam.com/video/w-sQblriYX8/w-d-xo.html
When you select "only masked" and then set the resolution lower it's only using the lower resolution for the inpainted area. The reason the image overall still looks good is because it's the same resolution. Using a higher or lower resolution while inpainting a mask doesn't have any impact on anything other than the inpainted area. Using this you can actually get more detail in your inpainted area by maintaining the high resolution (either with 1x if using rescale-by or by manually typing a higher resolution) it will generate for example the face at the selected full-size resolution and then shrink the inpaint down to fit inside the overall resolution of the image.
Thank you for your insightful comment! You're absolutely right about how the 'only masked' function and resolution settings work in Automatic 1111. I must admit, there was a misunderstanding on my part regarding this. Your explanation is spot on and it's very helpful to me and, I'm sure, to other viewers as well. I will make sure to address this in a future video to correct this misunderstanding and to further enhance the learning experience for everyone. I truly appreciate your input and contribution to our community.
@@AIKnowledge2Go Was that response generated by Chat-GPT? Because it looks like it hahaha
@@freakdeer2486 100%
How do you make sure that you don't go too high in resolution and clash with the larger picture in amount of details? Is there a way to calculate the actual size of the selection? I'd be curious to use x/y/z plots for the whole process to save a lot of time.
But wouldn't the resolution make a difference to what result you get? Generating a 1024x1024 image gives you a different image compared to 512x512. So if he wanted to get something close to original as far as general image properties, it would make sense to do the inpainting at that original resolution. Unless it really doesn't matter in this particular case...
I got into stable diffusion last year and i had a lot of fun figuring out how everything works by myself. I'm pretty much self taught so i knew there would be some features i didn't know about so i thought i would finally look up how other people do their generations. Boy did i need to hear about the inpainting function. I knew what it was supposed to do but i could never figure out the specifics of how to get it to work. This is a major game changer for me! Thank you so much!
I love the german accent by the way. You sound like a very friendly person.
I'm so glad to hear that the inpainting function has made such a difference for you! It's always rewarding to discover new features that enhance our creative process. Keep experimenting! Thanks for the remarks on my accent. 😊
Finally someone was able to provide very descriptive and helpful tips, thank you
I'm really glad to hear that you found the tips helpful! I strive to make my content as clear and informative as possible, so it's fantastic to know it's hitting the mark. Thanks for the kind words!
This is by far the most useful tutorial on stable diffusion I've run into!
Thank you so much! I'm glad you found it helpful. Happy diffusing! 🚀
Man... You're tutorial is so good, way much better then any I saw before danke !
I'm really glad you found the tutorial helpful! Your support means a lot to me.
@@AIKnowledge2Go Well deserved ;)
The img2img upscale workflow is amazing. It completely saved an image that i would have thought was complete garbage!
That's fantastic to hear! The AI-powered img2img upscale truly is a game-changer for revitalizing images. I'm thrilled it helped you save an image.
Thanks for watching and sharing your success!
This is easily the best tutorial I have seen on AI. Subscribed.
Wow, thank you so much for the high praise and for subscribing! I'm thrilled to hear that you found the tutorial to be so valuable. Your support means a lot, and it motivates me to keep creating high-quality content. Stay tuned for more AI insights and tutorials!
Been doing this for a while (still a noob of course), but this is by far the most useful info I've seen. thanks!
Glad to hear it! Happy creating.
If you want to dump more detail use controlnet tile + ultimate SD upscale
Thank you for your suggestion! The combination of controlnet tile and ultimate SD upscale is indeed a powerful technique for getting more detail. I have plans to cover this and other advanced techniques in an upcoming part II tutorial. Stay tuned for that, and I appreciate your input!
This video has some serious early 2010 movie maker vibes - you just know it's gonna be good and helpful!.
And bam! I wasn't dissapointed - super precise & to the point. A complete workflow highlighting each step, thanks so much 👍 The german accent is just the cherry on top 🍒
Thank you for the fantastic feedback! Thrilled to hear the video hit the mark with my content. Your appreciation, especially for the German accent, brings a huge smile to my face! 🍒 Exciting news: the next video will also focus on a workflow, this time harnessing the power of ControlNet. Your support inspires me to keep creating. Don't miss out-thanks for being an awesome part of our community!
@@AIKnowledge2Go good to hear that I could put a smile on your face 😋 I’m totally excited for the next video as well! ControlNet is so far the one thing I haven't touched, but would love to know more about and slowly master.
I know this might get lost here, but, thank you, you really made my day, been a bit sad lately with life and everything and I just wanted to learn something new to keep myself occupied. With something. Just to not think about it all and produce art. You made that all possible. So thank you and I hope that you know that you made someone's life better.
I'm deeply touched by your words, and I'm so grateful to know that my videos have been able to provide you with some comfort and a positive distraction during this time. Life can be challenging, but remember that it's okay to take time for yourself and do something that brings you joy. The beauty of creating art is that it allows us to express ourselves, to lose ourselves in the process, and to make sense of our experiences. Never hesitate to reach out if you have any questions or just want to share your creations. Thank you for being a part of this community, and please take care of yourself.
thats what i call a quality contect tutorial ! the tutor knows what he is doing here ...
Thank you so much for your kind words! I'm really glad to hear that you found the tutorial helpful and of high quality. It's comments like yours that motivate me to keep creating and sharing more content. Stay tuned for more tutorials!
This video of yours has given me whole new level of understanding of what I am supposed to do, thank you!
Glad it was helpful! You are welcome
Just started getting into stable diffusion and this video completely changes things. Thank you so much!
I'm glad the video could help! It's amazing how much of a difference understanding stable diffusion can make. Happy creating!
Hello, could you please tell me how you enabled the bars on the side of your image on 4:16? The ones that let you pull the image up and down and to the sides. I can't find anywhere on how to enable them, for me images just get squeezed smaller and for really wide images that makes it so hard to work with.
Oh, those scroll bars were actually a result of using ctrl + mousewheel to zoom in on my browser. It appears that feature might have been changed or removed in newer versions. 😞
However, I'd recommend the canvas zoom extension for a1111. You can find it under extensions -> available -> load from, or check these direct links. haven't tried it myself but it seems to do what you are looking for:
github.com/richrobber2/canvas-zoom
Hope this helps!
I know I'm late to this video but this helped me out big time! Needless to say I'm now subscribed and following your videos.
Thank you for your kind words and subscribing. There's actually an improved version of this workflow you can find in this video th-cam.com/video/wyDRHRuHbAU/w-d-xo.html
it uses control net so it's a little more advanced. Happy creating
That's really insightful. I don't have to throw away good images with small blemishes. Thanks!
Glad it was helpful!
I dont have a resize by option. When i go to inpaint and img2img I just have another width and height chart.
To see the 'resize by' option, you may need to update your version of Automatic 1111. The latest version as of today is 1.3.2. I've confirmed that this feature isn't related to any extensions, as I still had access to it even after disabling all of my extensions. Please try updating your version.
What is the best computer to use for Automatic?
The ideal computer for running Automatic1111 largely depends on your budget. If cost is not a concern, I would suggest going for a system with an Nvidia RTX 4090 graphics card and an Intel I7-9700K processor or faster. However, keep in mind that when it comes to running Automatic1111, the GPU and VRAM are significantly more important than the CPU.
How much was your computer? lol I mean, I'm utterly jealous by how fast yours works, and I don't know where to even start looking for good brands @@AIKnowledge2Go
Do you struggle with prompting? 🌟 Download a sneak peak of my prompt guide 🌟 No Membership needed: ⬇ Head over to my Patreon to grab your free copy now! ⬇ www.patreon.com/posts/sneak-peek-alert-90799508?Link&
Thanks, great tutorial. 5 seconds on how the setting works woild be cool too. Though i do appreicate the explanation on some.
Hi thanks for the feedback. if you need a more basic tutorial watch this video: th-cam.com/video/63Jn7Cn7Y4M/w-d-xo.html
and once you are more advanced i suggest this one:
th-cam.com/video/wyDRHRuHbAU/w-d-xo.html&lc=UgzNJLxlQ4IgEaFLjJ54AaABAg
Happy creating.
I like the roboto thingy on her leg. Very cool. Thanks for sharing
Thank you i am glad you liked it. Stay tuned for more.
I use Draw Things on my iPad and iPhone but even so this video has been very helpful! Your presentation is clear and simple, with no filler. Fantastic!
Draw Things is indeed a great piece of software. I'm thrilled that you found the video helpful and appreciate your kind words about the presentation. Thanks for taking the time to comment!
German Attitude 😂 - No filling, more information, more efficiency. Right?
I know it doesn't really matter, but I absolutely love your accent. Very helpful video as well ofc!
I'm glad you enjoy my accent. I wasn't sure how native speakers would perceive it. Thanks for the feedback!
Thank you for making such awesome videos! Love the German accent. Just liked and subscribed.
Thank you for your kind words and support! I'm glad you're enjoying the content and my German accent! Stay tuned for more exciting videos.
More video please.... I learned so much from this video.
Thank you for your feedback! I'm glad to hear that you found the video informative and valuable. The next Video releases in a few minutes actually :) Stay tuned!
Looking forward to Part 2!
Thanks so much for your excitement about Part 2! 🌟 Your wait is over: th-cam.com/video/mrWmEWEZwDw/w-d-xo.html. Just a heads-up: since Parts I and II have been around for a bit, some of the settings might have changed. I'm planning to update them as soon as I can find a slot in my busy schedule. Stay tuned and happy creating! Your support means a lot! 🚀
@@AIKnowledge2Go Wow good timing! I just saw the video, thanks for letting me know. I already liked and posted a couple of comments!
the inpainting part on the legs.. it give me random weired output and deform. can we somehow have a greater control on what it will be render out?
To have more control I suggest you use controlNet. I have a newer version of this video right here: th-cam.com/video/wyDRHRuHbAU/w-d-xo.html
so there isn't a way to do inpaint and give it new prompts which it knows only to apply to the masked area?
Yes there is. Just change the prompt. In fact that is the reason why is have this little "spider thingy" on her leg, because i did not change the prompt. Happy Creating.
Wow man this is exactly what i was looking for this really helped a lot with learning a better work flow im making all kinds of crazy new images now keep up the good work liked and subbed.
Thank you so much for your enthusiastic feedback! I'm thrilled to hear that you found the workflow helpful and that it's inspiring you to create all sorts of new images. Your support really means a lot to me. Keep experimenting and creating, and stay tuned for more content. Thanks again for subscribing and liking!
@@AIKnowledge2Go I don't suppose you know of a good way to reproduce the same character. I know about LORAs but i am trying to generate multiple pictures of the same character that i can then turn into a LORA .... at least i think that's how it is done LOL im a noob :)
I'm already feeling overwhelmed
I'm sorry to hear that you're feeling overwhelmed. I'd suggest starting with my basic tutorial to build a foundation, then gradually progress from there. Here's the link to help you get started: th-cam.com/video/SHikMK39Q30/w-d-xo.html.
Hi, is it possible to remove specific objects? Sometimes the picture only has one thing bad about it and i cnat remove it
Hi yes it is. Maybe you want to use controlNet for this. Here is a newer version of this video. th-cam.com/video/wyDRHRuHbAU/w-d-xo.html
To remove objects just write what you want to have instead on the background for prompt when inpainting. You need to experiment with the denoising strength.
Really great guide, a well earned sub and I hope you continue to produce content of this calibre and earn success!
Thank you so much for the kind words and support! I'll do my best to keep delivering quality content. Stay tuned for more. Happy creating!
with the same settings and just some changes to the negative prompt I was able to get much better faces, limbs, and less disfigured limbs with initial generation making the later inpainting much quicker.
You've made a great observation! This video primarily showcases this particular workflow. However, it's worth noting that when your prompts become more complex, or you're using multiple 'loras' as is often the case for creating stunning art in SD 1.5, the quality of faces tends to diminish. That’s exactly where this workflow proves to be incredibly useful.
Is there a way to generate character art with transparency. Im thinking of just generating the character and background seperately.
One approach is to first generate an image without a person and then use inpainting to add the character. Alternatively, you could use a segmentation model in ControlNet to achieve this. If you're looking to remove the background from an existing image with a character, using an external background removal tool would be the way to go.
very quick and detailed tutorial, you earned a sub!
Thank you so much! Welcome to the community! 🚀
Thanks!
This has re-newed my interest in virtual worlds-building!
I'm thrilled to hear that this has reignited your interest in building virtual worlds! It's such a fascinating field with so much potential. I'm glad my content could be part of your renewed journey. Thanks for sharing your experience and happy world-building!
I've been tinkering with BlenderAI, Stable-Diffusion that works inside of the Blender modelling system.
Blender renders a source image which is passed into Diffusion (along with animated prompts!)
The Blender scenes (3d animations) are a great starting point, but I can see that using this work-flow is going to greatly improve my results.
My current project is to 'convert' a short video clip into a nightmarish vision using BlenderAI to re-work frames of video.
Being able to play with 'sliders' on a frame-by-frame basis is pretty wild!
Danke Mann :D das Tutorial hat mir echt weiter geholfen, mein Abo hast du sicher!
Das freut mich zu hören! Ich bin froh, dass das Tutorial dir helfen konnte. Vielen Dank für dein Abo, ich schätze deine Unterstützung sehr!
Is the workflow same for complex objects, like tentacles? Do you recommend any useful video for making AI tentacle nsfw?
While I can't provide specific content recommendations for NSFW topics, I suggest checking out Civitai for a wide range of models and resources. They have a diverse collection of AI models that can be used for various purposes, including complex objects. Maybe try combining poses with "complex objects" and experiment with the lora strengh.😉
Hi, Can you explain this please.
why do you need to generate first set of images with Euler A?
when you can use the DPM++ 2M KARAS in the first place.
first set of images generated deformed faces.
I do not understand what are the benefits of doing the additional steps?
thanks
Hello! I appreciate your curiosity. The choice to start with Euler A isn't mandatory, it's more of a strategic move. Recently, I've been leaning more towards using DPM++ 2M Karras from the get-go.
As for the additional steps, it comes down to the limitations and preferences in image resolutions. Stable Diffusion 1.5 typically restricts us to generating images at 768 x 512 or 512 x 768, and occasionally 768 x 768. I like to stretch those boundaries to achieve higher resolutions, like 2K or even 4K.
By using the Image2Image upscale method, I feel I have a tighter grip on the upscaling process, compared to the highres fix workflow. Think of it like having a finer zoom lens for the details when you're aiming for that perfect shot in photography. It's about crafting the image with as much precision as possible.
I hope this gives you a clearer picture of why those extra steps might be worth the effort!
hello , what is the lora cyber on prompt ?
Hello, thank you for pointing out the missing information about 'lora cyber'. I apologize for the oversight. I've now updated the description to include it. If you're unsure about how to use loras, I recommend checking out my video on using lorases and models: th-cam.com/video/IEYMVIbPbQQ/w-d-xo.html. I hope you find it helpful!
Thiss isss the besssst sstable diffusion vid🖤🙏🏾 ssthanku sir
Thank you so much for the kind words! I'm glad you found the video helpful. Stay tuned for more content!
Fantastic and quick video - nicely concise and it'll be very useful!
i am Glad it was helpful to you!
Thank you so much!!! 💎 thiss is reaaaally helpful!
Awesome! Happy to help you out with my content!
ich habe das Problem, dass sich bei mir Bilder trotz maskiertem Bereich verändern. Natürlich achte ich auf CFG-Scale und Denoising strength-Einstellungen. Und auch auf das "clear", wenn ich ein neues Bild rein lade oder den Tab wechsle, etc. Trotzdem kämpfe ich mit Änderungen im nicht maskierten Bereich. Auch dafür habe ich die richtigen Häkchen gesetzt, so wie in dieser oder in anderen Beschreibungen. Was kann man da verkehrt machen?
Hallo ich versuche mal nach bestem Wissen aus der Ferne zu helfen...
Mit "Auch dafür habe ich die richtigen Häkchen gesetzt" ist gemeint das die Box "only masked" gesetzt ist, korrekt?
Welche Version ist auf dem PC installiert? Evtl. hilft ein Upgrade. Die aktuellste version von A1111 ist 1.6. Ansonsten hilft vielleicht eine frische installation. Hoffe, das hilft!
@@AIKnowledge2Go vielen Dank für die Rückmeldung. Nächste Woche kommt der neue PC, da wird dann die Neuinstallation notwendig sein. Meine Onboard Grafik mit 4 GB ist einfach zu mickrig. In der Eingabeaufforderung wird auch beim Laden direkt etwas mit "fatal git" gemeldet. Da muss ich auch nochmal nach einem anderen Installer schauen. Den, den ich habe, der fragt mich gefühlt 1000 Dinge ab, da komme ich mir vor wie bei einer multiple choice Programmierer-Abschlussprüfung. Und was ich letztlich gemacht habe, wissen wohl nur Gott und Teufel... 😅
That tip about mask being there altough it doesn´t appear is priceless! You just saved my entire life
I'm glad to hear that tip was helpful for you! I dont know why this is not fixed already. Maybe one day i'll write a bug ticket in Automatic 1111 github on the other hand, this move has become second nature to me. So even if this bug is fixed one day i will clear the mask anyway. :) Thanks for watching and happy creating!.
When I upscale the image giving it 0.5 noise I get a worse image. It just ruins the image with a lot of random variations instead than a coherent image. Any idea why?
Have you tried creating the same image with a different checkpoint?
Try lowering the denoising strengh.
thank you! that was it. With another checkpoint it worked just fine. Weird how different checkpoints work so differently@@AIKnowledge2Go
Very nice workflow. good tips. This can be helpful to a lot of people.
Thanks for sharing
I'm really glad to hear that you found the tips and workflow helpful! Sharing this knowledge and helping others is exactly why I create these videos. Your support and feedback are much appreciated. Thank you!
It's like listening to myself with my German Accent.
Top Video Bruder
Hi und danke für dein Feedback! Den Akzent bekomme ich einfach nicht raus 😂. Zum Glück scheinen ihn die meisten englischsprachigen Zuschauer eher amüsant als nervig zu finden.
I don't understand what I am doing wrong. When I am inpainting the face I follow your steps precisely and all my settings are the same as yours but I never get a new face on the image. I have tried inpainting other parts of the image and get the same results. I have tried changing all the settings individually just to get some change but nothing ever changes. All the images are output precisely the same as the original. What am I missing?
I'm sorry to hear that you're experiencing difficulties with generating new faces using the inpainting process. It's possible that there may be some issues with your installation or settings. Here are a few suggestions to troubleshoot the problem:
Make sure that your Automatic 1111 software is up to date. The latest version as of now is 1.4.0. If you're using an older version, consider updating to the latest release.
Double-check that all your settings match the ones shown in the tutorial video. Pay close attention to any specific prompts or parameters that are mentioned. Even a small difference in settings can affect the output.
If possible, try generating images with different prompts or inputs to see if the issue persists. This can help determine whether the problem is specific to the face inpainting process or a more general issue.
Consider performing a fresh install of Automatic 1111. Uninstall the current version, then download and install the latest version from the official source. This can help resolve any potential installation issues or conflicts.
If you continue to experience difficulties, it may be helpful to seek assistance from the Automatic 1111 community or support channels. They may be able to provide more specific guidance based on your specific setup and issue.
I'm still having issues with hands even with this method, do you have any tips? Anything would work for me, like using an specific model. Context: I do semi-realistic and anime images.
Edit: I managed to do it with another tutorial.
Ah, hands can indeed be tricky. When working with semi-realistic and anime images, consider using LORAs like badhands, badartis, or Unspeakable Horrors from Civitai. They can specifically help refine those details. Additionally, give ControlNet inpainting a shot, it's a great tool for correcting specific areas like hands. I use inpaint_only + llama often.
@@AIKnowledge2Go I tried before badhandv4 as a embedding but it is not working most of the time, I've been using inpaint too now that I know but I still have some issues. I guess it won't always work.
Hi again, I have some news. I watched another tutorial and I managed to get it to work as I wanted.
Hands are still hard but most of the time it works enough for me, hands are usually fine and with some edition I can make it look perfect.
Basically there are 2 important things: 1- Use a model that is good enough with hand generation. 2- Use the extension ADetailer. Optional: Use ControlNet too to let it know to the AI the position of the fingers. 3- Optional: Embeddings algo help and you can also use this "(badhandv4:1.5)" so you can force it to work harder.
What is the skip clip for?
Skipping layers can lead to variations in the generated images, potentially yielding results that are more aligned with your creative intent. Hope that helps.
Sehr geiles Video.
Hat mich einen echten Schritt nach vorne gebracht!
Danke für das Feedback, freut mich das es geholfen hat.
@@AIKnowledge2Go falls du gute Tips zu "Händen" hast, nehme ich die gern. 😄
@@AIKnowledge2Go youtube hat einfach meinen Link ausgeblended.. ..die biatch
@@Asterex versuchs mit negative embeddings wie z.b.civitai.com/models/116230/bad-hands-5
Ansonsten hat After Detailer auch die möglichkeit Hände zu "inpainten" zu after Deatiler hab ich auch ein Video. Allerdings ist da der Fokus auf Gesichtern.
@@AIKnowledge2Go das mit der negativ embedding probier ich aus! Vielen Dank!
This video is a gem, thank you very much!
Thank you for your kind words, it means a lot to me!
Awesome video excited to see your others and future videos
Thank you for your enthusiasm! It's great to know you found the video helpful. I'm excited to continue creating more content for you and the community. Stay tuned for more!
I had to chuckle when you said she'd need another leg and immediately masked her face :)
I'm glad my antics gave you a chuckle! I admit, sometimes my attention wand... - "Oh, look a bird!"😂 Jokes aside, there was some re-recording involved in creating the video. When it came to editing, I figured it would be easier to add some explanatory text rather than reshoot everything again. Thanks for noticing and watching!
Just one question, so in Automatic1111, does the refiner model doesn't work for image upscales?
When you refering to refiner you mean SD XL Models right?
Actually i havent done upscaling with it. My system crashes when i go higher than 1024 x 1024 with sdxl models. I still use a lot SD 1.5 because as of now in my opinion you can get better results with 1.5 if you know what you are doing.
german coastguard speaking 😍 great tutorial, will follow for more
Danke sehr! 😊 I'll do my best to keep up the quality. Stay tuned for more tutorials!
I don't have an option to adjust clip skip... what i am missing? Thanks
Ha, you might have missed the first minute of my video where I go over the clip skip settings 😂 But no worries! Just go back and check that section.Happy to help!
sry! and thank you!@@AIKnowledge2Go
oh wow.. i feel so dumb now. Okay in my defense ... I'm just dumb lmao@@AIKnowledge2Go
best tutorial for newbies, like it
Thank you for the positive feedback! Happy creating.
hi there! thank you for the guide and tutorial. Very useful information especially to users like me that only know how to put in prompts and click generate. Thank you again!
You're very welcome! I'm glad to hear that you found the guide and tutorial helpful. It's always my aim to make the process of AI art generation more accessible and easy to understand. Don't hesitate to explore my other videos for more tips and tricks. Thank you for your kind words and support. Stay tuned for future videos!
I just got in to stable diffusion automatic 1111, installed it alongside one of the lates toturial I found on youtube but my Ui looks lsightly diffrent for example I dont have "restore face" :/ why? can anyone help me do I need to download some additional addon or what ?
Hey there! It seems like the "restore face" feature was relocated in version A1111 1.6. To get it back:
Navigate to Settings -> User Interface.
Under the Quicksettings list, choose face_restoration.
Click on Apply Settings and then Reload UI. You should now see "Restore Faces" at the top of the page.
If you'd like it to be a default feature:
Go to Settings -> Restore Faces and enable it. Do note, if you've added it via Quicksettings, the description "Restore faces (will use a third-party model on generation result to reconstruct faces)" might not appear.
Alternatively, consider using After Detailer. Here is a video about it: th-cam.com/video/y3DxX9s0NhQ/w-d-xo.html
Hope this clears things up for you!
holy crap thank you@@AIKnowledge2Go
Looks fun! I can't wait to start messing around with this. I just got a new GPU so I could.
That's great to hear! Getting a new GPU can make a huge difference. Happy creating!
@@AIKnowledge2Go thanks it's only a 3060 but 12 gb. My old was a 760 and it would not even try
What about Seed???
Do we have to paste the same SEED in img2img from txt2img
Pls...
Great question! When you use the 'Send to Image 2 Image' feature, it automatically transfers the seed from txt2img to img2img. No need to paste it manually - it's all taken care of for you! 😊👍 Hope this helps, and happy creating!
I am using Adetailer it's amazing !!
Absolutely! Adetailer has been a game-changer. If you haven't seen it yet, check out my video on it; I delve into its benefits and how it can save you a lot of time. Cheers!
Great content! Thank you so much!
Glad you liked it!
I never considered sending an initial image I like to img2img. I'll have to try that. I normally copy and paste the seed of an image I like and tweak settings from there.
I found it a bit more intuitive compared to the high res fix workflow and in my experience, it often led to better results. But the beauty of these tools is the flexibility they offer. Definitely give it a try and see how it works for you!
@@AIKnowledge2Go I have been trying this method, and I am amazed how much better this technique is. I get so much more detailed and hi-res results. Thank you for sharing this.
Getting the User interface settings doesnt work for me. When i reload or Restart the UI they always vanish.
I'm sorry to hear you're having trouble with the User Interface settings. Could you please provide a bit more detail about the specific issue you're facing? Have you tried opening webui in another browser? firefox, chrome edge?
Good video and explanation! I'm just a bit confused about one thing, during inpainting is it really necessary to have an accurate prompt, for what you want specifically in that area? And what happens when you leave it blank, does it just try to "autofill"?
Hey there! Your prompt can guide the AI for better inpainting, but feel free to experiment and see what surprises the blank canvas brings! What i didn't do in my Video is to change the prompt. I actually should have changed it. Leaving it blank can work, but i suggest you use ControlNet Inpaint.
When I use promt it always generate realistic human but I want 3d or anime style how can I get it?
Are you using the checkpoint I suggested from CivitAI? It's called Rev Animated: civitai.com/models/7371.
@@AIKnowledge2Go so if I downloaded and install it I can just put promt and it will generate 3d/anime art right(sorry I just pick up AI art) and also😅 how can I say take a human model and make it into 3D art??
for me, during the ImgToImg inpainting, if i render with "restore faces" on, the eyes always come out blurred and wonky. if i turn it off, the eyes are fine, but of course they are not "upgraded" like they are (in theory) when "restore faces" is turned on.
That's indeed an interesting behaviour. The image resolution could play a role in what you are experiencing. Or you have to many loras, Textual inversion etc. active. What you can try: I have a very handy video about Afterdetailer. It's an extension that can automate inpainting of faces and other body parts and produces great results. I didn't mention it in this video as I wanted to keep things simple. Here is the link to the Afterdetailer tutorial video: th-cam.com/video/y3DxX9s0NhQ/w-d-xo.html. It might give you some insights on how to achieve better results with face restoration.
Love this video. I mainly learn through TH-cam Vids, and I've been an avid Stable Diffusion user since the onset. Keep making content like this that explains your actions & choices, and I know you're gonna have tons of subs soon.
Thank you so much for your kind words and support! I'm thrilled to hear that you find the videos helpful. I will certainly continue to create content that explains my process in detail. Your feedback and encouragement mean a lot to me. Stay tuned for more content!
adding keywords for face tend to decrease chances of getting mangled faces you will have to fix later. Try (highly detailed face, textured skin, detailed eyes)
That's a great tip, thanks for sharing! However, it's also worth mentioning that there will come a time when you'll want to upscale your image to enhance the overall quality. In that case, you might still need to deal with some mangled features, but hopefully fewer with your suggested keywords.
Awesome video man!! Dank je
Thanks for watching! I'm glad you enjoyed the video!
What setup do you have? because it generates super fast friend
Great question! It might seem super fast, but that's actually an illusion - I sped up the video for better engagement. The creation you saw was done with my old Nvidia 2080 Super. However, my current setup includes an Nvidia 4080 RTX and an Intel Core™ i9-13900K, which is indeed quite fast. To give you an idea, it can render 8 images at 512 x 768 resolution in about 35 to 40 seconds.
What do you guys do with the pcitures generated? If you sell it, then where?
Thank you for your question. Personally, I enjoy exploring my artistic side with these tools. In fact, before the rise of ChatGPT and other AI models, I hadn't even considered myself to be an artist. While it might be tempting to sell the images generated by these models, it's important to note that most of them specifically prohibit selling the content or offering creation services, such as commissions. Always make sure to check and respect the terms of use for the models and tools you're using.
i subbed THANK YOU THIS IS PERFECT! tytytytyty
I'm so glad you found it helpful! Your support means a lot to me! I have a newer version available: th-cam.com/video/w-sQblriYX8/w-d-xo.html
My 1080 can't upscale so much. Welp. But nice demonstration.
That model is right up my alley. I hope the dev will resume maintaining it after his hiatus.
I understand your concerns with the 1080. To address the VRAM issue, you might want to try adding the `--lowVram` or `--medVram` parameters when starting with webui-user.batch. Another approach for upscaling with limited VRAM is to utilize Controlnet Tile. It essentially breaks your image into smaller tiles and scales each one separately. This can be especially helpful for hardware with memory limitations. Hope that helps
Where do I find the Controlnet Tile? I'm not ready to follow your tutorial yet cos my internet is being throttled and that file for the revAnimated model you suggested is taking hours to download :/@@AIKnowledge2Go
Great job, the angle on the phone thing she is holding is a little off but overall your workflow and tips are appreciated.
Thank you for pointing that out! You're absolutely right there is still room for improvement. Happy creating
Kann man mit automatic auch sdxl und sd 1.5 models benutzen?
ja ohne Probleme, aber ich empfehle dir auf die neuste version 1.9.3 (derzeit) zu upgraden.
@@AIKnowledge2Go danke dir, hatte bis jetzt nur fooocus aber denke mit automatic wird es vielfältiger
how is restore face not changing the style of your images?
I see what you mean. It can be a bit tricky to understand. Depending on the Model and Loras you are using, the 'Restore Faces' option might work differently. I often prefer to use the 'inpaint faces' option or the After Detailer plugin. If you want a more in-depth explanation, you can check out my video on using the After Detailer plugin th-cam.com/video/y3DxX9s0NhQ/w-d-xo.html
insane dude, thank you very much
Thank you for your comment! I'm glad you found the content helpful and enjoyed it.
really amazing thanks! i was using it completely wrong before
I'm so glad to hear that the video was helpful for you! It's wonderful that you're now able to use the tool more effectively. Thanks for watching and happy creating!
Great tutorial. thanks!
Glad you enjoyed it!
First of all, a greeting and thanks for the video, a beautiful image. I wanted to ask you why you didn't use the High res fix, from what I understand what it does is the same as you did but saving you a step, that is, starting an imgtoimg process. What is the reason that you advise against its use?
High res fix can change many details compared to the original image
Thank you for your comment and your kind words about the video. @hoasiai is spot on. The High Res Fix does indeed have the potential to significantly alter the image, as does changing the sampler. My preference is for a straightforward workflow. I start with prompt engineering, and once I'm satisfied with the composition, I move to Image2Image to boost the quality when changing the sampler, without affecting the composition. I hope this clarifies my approach, and thanks again for your question!
You're getting a hand and a robot thing in your leg in painting because it's still part of the original prompt.
It's important to trim out portions that aren't applicable to what you're inpainting.
You're absolutely right. My skills in inpainting have improved since then. I'm considering re-recording this video in the future. Thanks for pointing that out, happy creating.
i see you have ADetailer! installed, but at which stage would you use it in this workflow? img2img or middle section?
I would use it while inpainting. While this image has only one person, sometimes you want to create setups with multiple people. And masking out a face and writing the prompt for the face in After Detailer, or using a Lora/TI/Lycoris, can be helpful. I hope that helps you on your creative journey.
Dman this is very nice workflow , i usually use ad detailer to fix face from the start , and for upscaling i go to img2img and use tiling with ultimate upscaling. I dont know why....thats just the workflow ive had. Ill try this now
It's always interesting to hear about others' workflows! The beauty of these AI tools is that there are so many ways to use them. It sounds like you have a process that works well for you, which is fantastic. My workflow is just one way to approach creating AI art, and I encourage you to try it out and see if it suits your style. Thanks for watching and happy creating!
u earned a new sub
Thanks for joining the community! I’m excited to have you here!
Hello @AIknowledge2Go, this is a really helpful video. Thank you for coming up wirh such a great content. I have a quick question here and would appreciate if you could provide some valuable suggestion. I have always been having challenge in worling with image2image generation, seems like the final result is no where close to my input image. For example, if I want to make minor edit to my normal human images like change clothes color, changing hairstyle, changing hairlength etc by keeping rest of the entire details intact should i go for image2image option in SD or should i use some other method for this? I am using absolutereality Checkpoint for this to ensure the pics are realistic. Any advise / suggestion would be greatly appreciated
Thank you for your kind words! If you want to make minor edits to your normal human images while keeping the rest of the details intact, using the inpaint option of Image2Image in Automatic 1111 is a good choice. However, for specific modifications like changing clothes color, hairstyle, or hair length, you may need to experiment with different prompts and parameters to achieve the desired results.
In addition to Image2Image, you can also explore the ControlNet model for inpainting, as it can be effective in preserving the overall details while making specific modifications. Remember to adjust your prompt accordingly to focus on the areas you want to edit.
It's important to experiment and iterate with different prompts, models, and parameters to achieve the desired outcome.
@@AIKnowledge2Go Thank you so much for your response . I totally agree , detailed prompt + config details are the key here, which I haven't mastered yet, still learning 🙂. Btw, if you don't mind me asking I would like to know if there is a way I can have a model trained to simply take input and change hairstyle on the same pic as output. Considering I have to work on multiple images, it would be difficult to keep writing prompt on each image to get the desired result. Thank you so much for looking into this 🙂
mehr als eindeutig du bist deutsch ^^ allerdings muss ich sagen es war schwer zu verstehen, was was wirklich macht. ich nutze easy Diffusion als web ui auf meinem poweredge r630.
es war viel information gepackt in einem video allerdings hätte ich gern ein paar Beispiele gesehen. würde mich gern über eine video serie freuen die frei nach dem motte. lasst uns heute mal ein bild erstellen und dann vielleicht irgendwelche themen nehmen oder random ein paar worte zusammen werfen oder so. also quasi was man so als anfä´nger auch tun würde. wäre sicher interressant dich einfach mal bei dem prozess zu begleiten und auch deine hinter gründe zu hören wie und warum du das so jetzt machts.
aber sehr informativ und hat mir schon ein ganzes stück weiter geholfen
Ha da hast du mich erwischt 😂 Deutscher durch und durch😂
Du hu hast absolut recht, das Video richtet sich auch eher an Leute die bereits Berührungspunkte mit Automatic 1111 hatten. Ich kann dir dieses Video von mir empfehlen da erkläre ich die einzelnen Settings:
th-cam.com/video/SHikMK39Q30/w-d-xo.html
Wenn du der Liste folgst da hab ich einzelne Themenbereiche in Reihenfolge abgedeckt. Ich hoffe das hilft dir weiter.
What sampler is faster than DPM++ 2M Karras but good?
Good is indeed a subjective term when it comes to AI-generated art. It ultimately depends on what you're looking for in terms of balance between speed and output quality. For my workflow, I prefer to start with Euler A during the prompt engineering phase due to the specific characteristics it imparts to the generated images. Then, when it comes to upscaling, I switch to DPM++ 2M Karras due to its high level of quality in the results.
@@AIKnowledge2Go My thought process comes from the difference between SDE Karras and 2M Karras. SDE gives better quality but 2M has really good quality at half the speed. So I was wondering if I could go one more step down under 2M but I don’t think it’s possible. Somebody told me DDIM and yes it is faster than 2M by 1-2 seconds but that’s not a major difference and you sacrifice quality.
Do you have some source to adjust our research, a lot of parameters I've seen in this video, weren't showed anywhere, I assume part of it is emperical knowledge, still, if you can link us to great indept tutorial explan,ation it would save me a lot of hardwork ! Still I learn a ton from that video, and helped me adjust some issues i've got manytimes !
Your response is a good start, as it acknowledges the viewer's appreciation and seeks to clarify their specific needs. You could enhance it by offering direct links to your relevant videos and expressing a willingness to assist further. Here’s a revised version of your response:
Hi there! I'm thrilled to hear that my video was informative and helpful for you. Regarding the settings you're curious about, could you specify which parameters or aspects you're looking into? This will help me guide you better. Also, I have two basic videos on prompting and basic settings on my channel which might be just what you're looking for. I'll drop the links here for easy access:
th-cam.com/video/MftRapF4AaU/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/SHikMK39Q30/w-d-xo.html
Feel free to check these out. Also i have whole tutorial Series on stable diffusion.
Hey, wirklich ein sehr gutes Tutorial, danke dafür. Ich habe noch ein Problem, vielleicht kannst du helfen: Wenn ich in InPaint einen bestimmten Bereich maskiert habe, sagen wir zum Beispiel die Beine, und dann auf generate drücke, macht er mir keine neuen Beine, sondern es sieht so aus, als würde er das komplette Bild noch mal in dem maskierten Bereich erstellen. Hab die Einstellungen aus dem Video übernommen und auch mit verschiedenen Noise Strength experimentiert.
Danke für das Feedback. Wenn er das oder ein ähnliches Bild noch einmal erzeugt in dem maskierten Bereich, hast die denoising strengh zu hoch. Was ich in dem Video nicht zeige (weil ich es damals nicht besser wusste) ist, das du dein Prompt anpassen sollst/kannst/musst.
Wenn du z.b. ein Gesicht inpainten möchtest, dann schreib sowas wie "image of a face of..." was du im Prompt drin lassen sollest ist alles was das rendering betrifft (HDR, 4K, cinematic shot).
Inpainten ist immer auch ein bisschen Trial and error.
Hope that helps.
@@AIKnowledge2Go Danke für deine Antwort, es lag am Prompt. Hatte ich dann später noch rausgefunden 😅
thank you for great tips.
You're welcome! I'm glad you found the tips helpful. Happy experimenting!
Nice video.. 1 question, when I try pinpointing do you need to change the prompt at all? I keep getting strange results, for example, I inpatient the face, but then I get a whole corrupt face, sometimes with bodies and all sorts of things in it. Any tips?
Thank you for your feedback. Regarding pinpointing, adjusting the prompt can often help in achieving the desired results. It sounds like the issue might be related to the denoising strength; consider reducing it. If you're having specific problems with faces, I recommend checking out my video on 'After Detailer'. This tool can realy make inpainting face effortless
fantastic video, ever so helpful, liked and sub'ed🍻
Thank you so much for your kind words and support! I'm thrilled to hear you found the video helpful. Cheers to more learning and exploration together! 🍻
Great workflow as I had abandoned SD and came back after your video. I wanted to ask about two types of prompts you used, and . Whenever I generate and my terminal shows Could not find two Lora files. Where do you download from and how do you install it?
Thanks for your comment. These two are Loras, extensions that can be wielded on a variety of models. Links are below in my video description. If you're not sure about how to use Loras, I suggest you watch my video on this topic. It'll give you a detailed guide on how to download, install, and use them. Here's the link: th-cam.com/video/IEYMVIbPbQQ/w-d-xo.html
Look at the actual file name. I guess he renamed it from what the file name on Civitai is. Use the actual file name without file type.
Hello, why I hanvn't the same result at all, with your prompt ? I have a cowboy on earth
Hello, that's intriguing! It sounds like there might be something different in your setup. Could you double-check if you're using the same checkpoint I'm using? Additionally, it might be worth checking the console window to see if there are any error messages or unexpected outputs. Also, make sure your LoRa (Long Range Wide Area Network) settings are working correctly. These factors can often impact the kind of results you get. Let me know how it goes!
@@AIKnowledge2Go Yes, sorry, I've learned a lot since then and I understand better now. I certainly didn't have everything to install.
Thanks for your answer