I think the final realization is that there is no solid matter or solid components at the smallest level, but simply vibration and energy, and perhaps the universe is like a 3d cymatic plate of sand
Conservation of Spatial Curvature (both Matter and Energy described as "Quanta" of Spatial Curvature) Is there an alternative interpretation of "Asymptotic Freedom"? What if Quarks are actually made up of twisted tubes which become physically entangled with two other twisted tubes to produce a proton? Instead of the Strong Force being mediated by the constant exchange of gluons, it would be mediated by the physical entanglement of these twisted tubes. When only two twisted tubules are entangled, a meson is produced which is unstable and rapidly unwinds (decays) into something else. A proton would be analogous to three twisted rubber bands becoming entangled and the "Quarks" would be the places where the tubes are tangled together. The behavior would be the same as rubber balls (representing the Quarks) connected with twisted rubber bands being separated from each other or placed closer together producing the exact same phenomenon as "Asymptotic Freedom" in protons and neutrons. The force would become greater as the balls are separated, but the force would become less if the balls were placed closer together. Therefore, the gluon is a synthetic particle (zero mass, zero charge) invented to explain the Strong Force. An artificial Christmas tree can hold the ornaments in place, but it is not a real tree. String Theory was not a waste of time, because Geometry is the key to Math and Physics. However, can we describe Standard Model interactions using only one extra spatial dimension? What did some of the old clockmakers use to store the energy to power the clock? Was it a string or was it a spring? What if we describe subatomic particles as spatial curvature, instead of trying to describe General Relativity as being mediated by particles? Fixing the Standard Model with more particles is like trying to mend a torn fishing net with small rubber balls, instead of a piece of twisted twine. Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules: “We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question which divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct.” Neils Bohr (lecture on a theory of elementary particles given by Wolfgang Pauli in New York, c. 1957-8, in Scientific American vol. 199, no. 3, 1958) The following is meant to be a generalized framework for an extension of Kaluza-Klein Theory. Does it agree with some aspects of the “Twistor Theory” of Roger Penrose, and the work of Eric Weinstein on “Geometric Unity”, and the work of Dr. Lisa Randall on the possibility of one extra spatial dimension? During the early history of mankind, the twisting of fibers was used to produce thread, and this thread was used to produce fabrics. The twist of the thread is locked up within these fabrics. Is matter made up of twisted 3D-4D structures which store spatial curvature that we describe as “particles"? Are the twist cycles the "quanta" of Quantum Mechanics? When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. ( E=hf, More spatial curvature as the frequency increases = more Energy ). What if Quark/Gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks where the tubes are entangled? (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are a part of the quarks. Quarks cannot exist without gluons, and vice-versa. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Charge" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" are logically based on this concept. The Dirac “belt trick” also reveals the concept of twist in the ½ spin of subatomic particles. If each twist cycle is proportional to h, we have identified the source of Quantum Mechanics as a consequence twist cycle geometry. Modern physicists say the Strong Force is mediated by a constant exchange of Mesons. The diagrams produced by some modern physicists actually represent the Strong Force like a spring connecting the two quarks. Asymptotic Freedom acts like real springs. Their drawing is actually more correct than their theory and matches perfectly to what I am saying in this model. You cannot separate the Gluons from the Quarks because they are a part of the same thing. The Quarks are the places where the Gluons are entangled with each other. Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. The twist in the torus can either be Right-Hand or Left-Hand. Some twisted donuts can be larger than others, which can produce three different types of neutrinos. If a twisted tube winds up on one end and unwinds on the other end as it moves through space, this would help explain the “spin” of normal particles, and perhaps also the “Higgs Field”. However, if the end of the twisted tube joins to the other end of the twisted tube forming a twisted torus (neutrino), would this help explain “Parity Symmetry” violation in Beta Decay? Could the conversion of twist cycles to writhe cycles through the process of supercoiling help explain “neutrino oscillations”? Spatial curvature (mass) would be conserved, but the structure could change. ===================== Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else. Therefore, a "particle" is actually a structure which stores spatial curvature. Can an electron-positron pair (which are made up of opposite directions of twist) annihilate each other by unwinding into each other producing Gamma Ray photons? Does an electron travel through space like a threaded nut traveling down a threaded rod, with each twist cycle proportional to Planck’s Constant? Does it wind up on one end, while unwinding on the other end? Is this related to the Higgs field? Does this help explain the strange ½ spin of many subatomic particles? Does the 720 degree rotation of a 1/2 spin particle require at least one extra dimension? Alpha decay occurs when the two protons and two neutrons (which are bound together by entangled tubes), become un-entangled from the rest of the nucleons . Beta decay occurs when the tube of a down quark/gluon in a neutron becomes overtwisted and breaks producing a twisted torus (neutrino) and an up quark, and the ejected electron. The production of the torus may help explain the “Symmetry Violation” in Beta Decay, because one end of the broken tube section is connected to the other end of the tube produced, like a snake eating its tail. The phenomenon of Supercoiling involving twist and writhe cycles may reveal how overtwisted quarks can produce these new particles. The conversion of twists into writhes, and vice-versa, is an interesting process, which is also found in DNA molecules. Could the production of multiple writhe cycles help explain the three generations of quarks and neutrinos? If the twist cycles increase, the writhe cycles would also have a tendency to increase. Gamma photons are produced when a tube unwinds producing electromagnetic waves. ( Mass=1/Length ) The “Electric Charge” of electrons or positrons would be the result of one twist cycle being displayed at the 3D-4D surface interface of the particle. The physical entanglement of twisted tubes in quarks within protons and neutrons and mesons displays an overall external surface charge of an integer number. Because the neutrinos do not have open tube ends, (They are a twisted torus.) they have no overall electric charge. Within this model a black hole could represent a quantum of gravity, because it is one cycle of spatial gravitational curvature. Therefore, instead of a graviton being a subatomic particle it could be considered to be a black hole. In this model Alpha equals the compactification ratio within the twistor cone, which is approximately 1/137. 1= Hypertubule diameter at 4D interface 137= Cone’s larger end diameter at 3D interface where the photons are absorbed or emitted. The 4D twisted Hypertubule gets longer or shorter as twisting or untwisting occurs. (720 degrees per twist cycle.) How many neutrinos are left over from the Big Bang? They have a small mass, but they could be very large in number. Could this help explain Dark Matter? Why did Paul Dirac use the twist in a belt to help explain particle spin? Is Dirac’s belt trick related to this model? Is the “Quantum” unit based on twist cycles? I started out imagining a subatomic Einstein-Rosen Bridge whose internal surface is twisted with either a Right-Hand twist, or a Left-Hand twist producing a twisted 3D/4D membrane. This topological Soliton model grew out of that simple idea. I was also trying to imagine a way to stuff the curvature of a 3 D sine wave into subatomic particles.
i was in your shoes before and probably still am in a lot of ways 😊 but i kept persistent in exploring just about many avenues of trying to acquire understanding and many smarter people than i, have seem to observe that a lot of the these concepts are in ways very similar or represents the same idea of all these "different" concepts which eventually inter-lap robert edward grant for one elaborates how even light and sound are in one of the same just a different way they can be perceived but once again... i don't know anything about nothing so i guess train yourself to be open minded as much as you can because a shift in paradigm can be rattling lol forgive for offering my two-cents
I am thankful for the things science has figured out. but it makes me angry when people think, science knows the answers to fundamental questions that build up a worldview. such as the origin of life, the origin of the universe, consciousness and more. whilst arguing with religious people, that it is better to trust in facts than in a story of an old man with a beard as the creator of the world. if these people don't realize, that they are in the same boat of NOT KNOWING the answers, (and that everyone can only choose what to believe) then it is the most dangerous belief system of all. look at humanity. greed, selfishness, ignorance, the lack of conscience, living a sinful life seems to be a normal thing. 10 guys rape a girl and kill it. I don't want to say names, (even if I want to) but scientists should stop to deceive young people when it comes to these questions that build up a worldview.
So you oppose String Theory because it is not currently testable. I would like to know when in the past or when in the future your so-called God will be experimentaly detectable or provable or refutable.
Let's start with zero-dimensional wireless hydrogen. Then 1D with 2 strings and vibration to form water, water is H2O (solid (different lower temperature), liquid (higher temperature) and gas (highest level). Next 3D, for example with 2 strings and vibration and Temperature forms different carbon-based substances such as liquid gases, etc. Understanding strings and gravity from different dimensions of time and space requires further research.
HI. Your thoughts touch upon some intriguing concepts related to the nature of matter and the potential implications of string theory and dimensions. Let's break down your ideas and elaborate on the concepts you've mentioned: Zero-Dimensional Hydrogen: Describing hydrogen as zero-dimensional suggests a fundamental point-like nature, akin to particles in theoretical physics. However, hydrogen itself is a single atom composed of a nucleus (a proton) and an electron. It's important to note that the concept of dimensionality becomes more relevant when discussing the spatial extent of objects. 1D Strings and Vibration for Water: The idea of strings vibrating to form different particles is a core concept of string theory. While string theory proposes that particles are essentially different vibrational modes of tiny strings, it's important to remember that string theory is still a theoretical framework and has yet to be experimentally confirmed. Water's States: Water indeed exists in solid, liquid, and gas states, which are determined by temperature and pressure conditions. These changes are driven by the kinetic energy of molecules and the interactions between them. 3D Carbon-Based Substances: You're touching on the idea of molecular structures and their behavior in different dimensions. Carbon, due to its unique ability to form stable bonds with itself and other elements, leads to a vast array of molecules, including liquid gases like methane and ethane. However, the discussion of "2 strings and vibration" is an abstraction and doesn't directly reflect the complexities of molecular behavior in three dimensions. String Theory and Gravity: String theory does indeed aim to unify quantum mechanics and gravity, which are currently described by separate theories (quantum mechanics and general relativity, respectively). However, string theory is still undergoing development and faces challenges in making testable predictions. Dimensions of Time and Space: You're hinting at the potential influence of additional dimensions beyond our usual three dimensions of space and one dimension of time. Some theories, including string theory, propose the existence of extra dimensions that could have implications for the fundamental nature of particles and forces. Further Research: It's crucial to emphasize that the ideas you've mentioned are in the realm of theoretical physics and require further research and experimental validation. String theory, while elegant, is still being explored, and its full implications and testable predictions are not fully realized. In conclusion, your ideas touch on significant concepts in physics, including string theory, dimensionality, and the behavior of matter. However, it's important to distinguish between theoretical frameworks and established scientific principles. As our understanding of these theories advances and technology allows for more sophisticated experiments, we may gain deeper insights into the nature of the universe and the fundamental forces that govern it. Thank you for your contribution
While string theory is an intriguing and mathematically elegant idea, it's essential to clarify that our current understanding of it is still theoretical and lacks experimental confirmation. As of now, string theory has not been definitively proven or disproven through experimentation, making it a subject of ongoing research and debate among physicists. When it comes to dark matter and dark energy, the situation is complex. String theory has the potential to address fundamental questions about the nature of these enigmatic components of the universe. However, at present, string theory hasn't provided a conclusive explanation for them. Dark matter is thought to be a form of matter that doesn't emit light or energy and thus cannot be directly observed. String theory offers some hypotheses regarding the nature of dark matter, suggesting that certain types of string-like objects, called "branes," could play a role in its behavior. However, these ideas are still being explored and are far from settled. Dark energy, on the other hand, is the mysterious force responsible for the accelerated expansion of the universe. String theory has not yet provided a definitive explanation for dark energy, and the quest to understand its nature remains an open question in the field. In summary, while the idea that everything is made of tiny vibrating strings is a fascinating concept, its application to dark matter and dark energy is still a work in progress within the realm of theoretical physics. String theory holds promise for explaining these phenomena, but it has not yet yielded concrete and universally accepted explanations. As our understanding of string theory evolves and experiments advance, we may gain insights into whether it can indeed shed light on the mysteries of dark matter and dark energy. I hope this helps Craig
I understand that research in physics and matter is both curious and necessary for some function of society. But how far do we proceed and spend our wealth to "discover" the ultimate cause of existence? Even the "lesser fleas" have smaller yet and so infinitum. Do you really think that at the end of this rabbit-hole we will open a door and God will say, "O.K, you found Me?" Not in THIS life. But one must admit that there are hidden, unexplained forces "vibrating" these strings and subatomic particles. SOME thing has to be vibrating them. WHY is there "gravity?" "Splain THAT, Lucy." "Matter" did not always exist. but at some point, it "became." Whence did it become? Until someone can satisfy my lessening curiosity -- not abandonment -- I will believe that there is an eternal force with intelligence and purpose which or who intended to bring about matter and energy (or energy before matter). The author of Genesis, Job, and the prophet Micah were NOT stupid, nor child-like. They KNEW something important. Where they got their knowing is, to many, a mystery and to others a fantasy. But if one will go outside of one's own bias and distraction, one must admit "I believe in "God..."
Earth is extremely unique in that 900-million years ago it had a high pressure carbon dioxide atmosphere much like Venus has today.The atmospheric pressure on the surface of Venus is currently1350 pounds per square inch. In other words Venus currently has 92 times more air than earth.The atmospheric pressure on Earth is currently14.7 pounds per square inch and Co2 is a trace gas at .033%. So where did early Earth’s high pressure atmosphere go? After earth left its birthplace in Orion Earth froze up for a billion years known as the Huronian Glaciation. Earth had one continent covered with a five-mile deep coating of ice. Finally our Sun with a masses of 2e30 drifted between Sirius A and B that has a mass of 6.8e30 and Procyon A and B with a mass of 6e30 Each of these stars that aren’t from our Galaxy but were captured by it and each has a white dear orbiting them. Our Sun matched the speed of Sirius B, the size of Earth that has a mass of 3e30; 1.5 times more gravity than our Sun and we started following it around Sirius A. It was the light from those objects that allows you to drive a car and heats your home, not the Sun! The little white dwarf star the size of Earth but 1.5 solar masses puts our more than 100-times the light of our sun in the UV spectrum. It was the light from Sirius A and B that melted the billion-year Huronian Glaciation and took Earth’s high pressure 1000 PSI CO2 atmosphere down with photosynthesis into coal, oil and limestone layers up to 12,500-feet thick. The sun did not make our carbon resources on Earth! When you are driving your car down the road you are recycling light energy from Sirius A and B, not the Sun! Humans have been worshiping the wrong sun god for 4000 years. All that UV light from Sirius B also modified animal and plant DNA to speeding up evolution. The sun did not burn as hot 800-million years ago as it does today so there is no way the Sun could have made our carbon energy and resources on this planet. Our Sun was captured by Sirius A and B about 800-million years ago. We were in a nice tight orbit following Sirius B around Sirius A at eight to ten astronomical units for 750-million years. Earth’s 1000 PSI atmosphere was taken down with photosynthesis with light from Sirius A and B into limestone layers up to 12,500-feet thick (calcium carbonates). The light from the Sirius system created vast layers of coal and oil all made by plants using light from Sirius A and B not the Sun and released free oxygen in the process. There is only one object out there capable of getting through early earth 3000-mile deep atmosphere and that is the Sirius system and we are heading toward it a 7.5 kilometers per second. We did the orbit calculations and it matches the Ice Age cycle of 105,000 years-hence the title of the book. Sirius B, the size of Earth and 1.5 solar masses has more gravity than the sun. We matched its speed and it put us in orbit around Sirius A. Sirius B orbits at 8 to 10 AU around Sirius A every 50-years. Sirius B puts out 100 to 1000 times the light of our sun in the UV spectrum in 350 to 400 nanometers. It’s the only object out there capable of getting through early Earth’s 1000 pound per square inch atmosphere that was over 3000 miles deep to create life “on the surface of the waters” and give us our wonderful carbon resources. Sirius A, being 4.5 solar masses puts out four times the light of our sun in the visible light spectrum helped thaw the five-mile deep ice sheets of the billion-year Huronian Glaciation. This had to take place before non-cyclic photosynthesis could take place. When you are driving your car down the road or heating your home with coal or oil you are recycling stellar energy from Sirius A and B, not the sun! Read: COSMOLOGICAL ICE AGES by Henry Kroll www.HankKroll.com, www.Trafford,com, www.Amazon,com And bookstores around the world. Reducing carbon dioxide will kill earth. Oswald didn’t kill Kennedy. Kennedy was shot from the front.
Not worth watching. 95% of the video is working up to an explanation of string theory but the explanation is not worth waiting for. Avoid this and go to the next one from the algorithm.
BE A MAN OF CELIBACY THEN START MEDITATION YOU WILL GET ALL YOUR Q TRUE ANSWER MONKSHIP FIRST WITHOUT MONK ALL KNOWLEDGE IS IMPURE OR GUESS. GUESS IS NOT EDUCATION
better explained. TY
The theory that all Police songs are better with Sting?
Just wondering what created those vibrating strings.🤔
The string theorists. They only exist in their imagination. ;-)
I think the final realization is that there is no solid matter or solid components at the smallest level, but simply vibration and energy, and perhaps the universe is like a 3d cymatic plate of sand
What is the "sand?"
hi what is string made of?
It's made of force. Energy. But that's about as far as one can go without admitting that there is an eternal force and being who makes it all happen.
Conservation of Spatial Curvature (both Matter and Energy described as "Quanta" of Spatial Curvature)
Is there an alternative interpretation of "Asymptotic Freedom"? What if Quarks are actually made up of twisted tubes which become physically entangled with two other twisted tubes to produce a proton? Instead of the Strong Force being mediated by the constant exchange of gluons, it would be mediated by the physical entanglement of these twisted tubes. When only two twisted tubules are entangled, a meson is produced which is unstable and rapidly unwinds (decays) into something else. A proton would be analogous to three twisted rubber bands becoming entangled and the "Quarks" would be the places where the tubes are tangled together. The behavior would be the same as rubber balls (representing the Quarks) connected with twisted rubber bands being separated from each other or placed closer together producing the exact same phenomenon as "Asymptotic Freedom" in protons and neutrons. The force would become greater as the balls are separated, but the force would become less if the balls were placed closer together. Therefore, the gluon is a synthetic particle (zero mass, zero charge) invented to explain the Strong Force. An artificial Christmas tree can hold the ornaments in place, but it is not a real tree.
String Theory was not a waste of time, because Geometry is the key to Math and Physics. However, can we describe Standard Model interactions using only one extra spatial dimension? What did some of the old clockmakers use to store the energy to power the clock? Was it a string or was it a spring?
What if we describe subatomic particles as spatial curvature, instead of trying to describe General Relativity as being mediated by particles? Fixing the Standard Model with more particles is like trying to mend a torn fishing net with small rubber balls, instead of a piece of twisted twine.
Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules:
“We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question which divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct.” Neils Bohr
(lecture on a theory of elementary particles given by Wolfgang Pauli in New York, c. 1957-8, in Scientific American vol. 199, no. 3, 1958)
The following is meant to be a generalized framework for an extension of Kaluza-Klein Theory. Does it agree with some aspects of the “Twistor Theory” of Roger Penrose, and the work of Eric Weinstein on “Geometric Unity”, and the work of Dr. Lisa Randall on the possibility of one extra spatial dimension? During the early history of mankind, the twisting of fibers was used to produce thread, and this thread was used to produce fabrics. The twist of the thread is locked up within these fabrics. Is matter made up of twisted 3D-4D structures which store spatial curvature that we describe as “particles"? Are the twist cycles the "quanta" of Quantum Mechanics?
When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. ( E=hf, More spatial curvature as the frequency increases = more Energy ). What if Quark/Gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks where the tubes are entangled? (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are a part of the quarks. Quarks cannot exist without gluons, and vice-versa. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Charge" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" are logically based on this concept. The Dirac “belt trick” also reveals the concept of twist in the ½ spin of subatomic particles. If each twist cycle is proportional to h, we have identified the source of Quantum Mechanics as a consequence twist cycle geometry.
Modern physicists say the Strong Force is mediated by a constant exchange of Mesons. The diagrams produced by some modern physicists actually represent the Strong Force like a spring connecting the two quarks. Asymptotic Freedom acts like real springs. Their drawing is actually more correct than their theory and matches perfectly to what I am saying in this model. You cannot separate the Gluons from the Quarks because they are a part of the same thing. The Quarks are the places where the Gluons are entangled with each other.
Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. The twist in the torus can either be Right-Hand or Left-Hand. Some twisted donuts can be larger than others, which can produce three different types of neutrinos. If a twisted tube winds up on one end and unwinds on the other end as it moves through space, this would help explain the “spin” of normal particles, and perhaps also the “Higgs Field”. However, if the end of the twisted tube joins to the other end of the twisted tube forming a twisted torus (neutrino), would this help explain “Parity Symmetry” violation in Beta Decay? Could the conversion of twist cycles to writhe cycles through the process of supercoiling help explain “neutrino oscillations”? Spatial curvature (mass) would be conserved, but the structure could change.
=====================
Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else. Therefore, a "particle" is actually a structure which stores spatial curvature. Can an electron-positron pair (which are made up of opposite directions of twist) annihilate each other by unwinding into each other producing Gamma Ray photons?
Does an electron travel through space like a threaded nut traveling down a threaded rod, with each twist cycle proportional to Planck’s Constant? Does it wind up on one end, while unwinding on the other end? Is this related to the Higgs field? Does this help explain the strange ½ spin of many subatomic particles? Does the 720 degree rotation of a 1/2 spin particle require at least one extra dimension?
Alpha decay occurs when the two protons and two neutrons (which are bound together by entangled tubes), become un-entangled from the rest of the nucleons
. Beta decay occurs when the tube of a down quark/gluon in a neutron becomes overtwisted and breaks producing a twisted torus (neutrino) and an up quark, and the ejected electron. The production of the torus may help explain the “Symmetry Violation” in Beta Decay, because one end of the broken tube section is connected to the other end of the tube produced, like a snake eating its tail. The phenomenon of Supercoiling involving twist and writhe cycles may reveal how overtwisted quarks can produce these new particles. The conversion of twists into writhes, and vice-versa, is an interesting process, which is also found in DNA molecules. Could the production of multiple writhe cycles help explain the three generations of quarks and neutrinos? If the twist cycles increase, the writhe cycles would also have a tendency to increase.
Gamma photons are produced when a tube unwinds producing electromagnetic waves. ( Mass=1/Length )
The “Electric Charge” of electrons or positrons would be the result of one twist cycle being displayed at the 3D-4D surface interface of the particle. The physical entanglement of twisted tubes in quarks within protons and neutrons and mesons displays an overall external surface charge of an integer number. Because the neutrinos do not have open tube ends, (They are a twisted torus.) they have no overall electric charge.
Within this model a black hole could represent a quantum of gravity, because it is one cycle of spatial gravitational curvature. Therefore, instead of a graviton being a subatomic particle it could be considered to be a black hole.
In this model Alpha equals the compactification ratio within the twistor cone, which is approximately 1/137.
1= Hypertubule diameter at 4D interface
137= Cone’s larger end diameter at 3D interface where the photons are absorbed or emitted.
The 4D twisted Hypertubule gets longer or shorter as twisting or untwisting occurs. (720 degrees per twist cycle.)
How many neutrinos are left over from the Big Bang? They have a small mass, but they could be very large in number. Could this help explain Dark Matter?
Why did Paul Dirac use the twist in a belt to help explain particle spin? Is Dirac’s belt trick related to this model? Is the “Quantum” unit based on twist cycles?
I started out imagining a subatomic Einstein-Rosen Bridge whose internal surface is twisted with either a Right-Hand twist, or a Left-Hand twist producing a twisted 3D/4D membrane. This topological Soliton model grew out of that simple idea. I was also trying to imagine a way to stuff the curvature of a 3 D sine wave into subatomic particles.
Interesting video. Ultimately resulting in untestable hypothesis and theories. I don't see where it's an improvment over genesis by a creator.
i was in your shoes before and probably still am in a lot of ways 😊 but i kept persistent in exploring just about many avenues of trying to acquire understanding and many smarter people than i, have seem to observe that a lot of the these concepts are in ways very similar or represents the same idea of all these "different" concepts which eventually inter-lap
robert edward grant for one elaborates how even light and sound are in one of the same just a different way they can be perceived
but once again... i don't know anything about nothing so i guess train yourself to be open minded as much as you can because a shift in paradigm can be rattling lol
forgive for offering my two-cents
I am thankful for the things science has figured out. but it makes me angry when people think, science knows the answers to fundamental questions that build up a worldview. such as the origin of life, the origin of the universe, consciousness and more. whilst arguing with religious people, that it is better to trust in facts than in a story of an old man with a beard as the creator of the world. if these people don't realize, that they are in the same boat of NOT KNOWING the answers, (and that everyone can only choose what to believe) then it is the most dangerous belief system of all. look at humanity. greed, selfishness, ignorance, the lack of conscience, living a sinful life seems to be a normal thing. 10 guys rape a girl and kill it. I don't want to say names, (even if I want to) but scientists should stop to deceive young people when it comes to these questions that build up a worldview.
Anything, I repeat, anything would be better than what you suppose.
So you oppose String Theory because it is not currently testable. I would like to know when in the past or when in the future your so-called God will be experimentaly detectable or provable or refutable.
You might want to correct the typo in the title.
Thank you for highlighting that for me. Well observed!
Let's start with zero-dimensional wireless hydrogen. Then 1D with 2 strings and vibration to form water, water is H2O (solid (different lower temperature), liquid (higher temperature) and gas (highest level). Next 3D, for example with 2 strings and vibration and Temperature forms different carbon-based substances such as liquid gases, etc. Understanding strings and gravity from different dimensions of time and space requires further research.
HI.
Your thoughts touch upon some intriguing concepts related to the nature of matter and the potential implications of string theory and dimensions. Let's break down your ideas and elaborate on the concepts you've mentioned:
Zero-Dimensional Hydrogen: Describing hydrogen as zero-dimensional suggests a fundamental point-like nature, akin to particles in theoretical physics. However, hydrogen itself is a single atom composed of a nucleus (a proton) and an electron. It's important to note that the concept of dimensionality becomes more relevant when discussing the spatial extent of objects.
1D Strings and Vibration for Water: The idea of strings vibrating to form different particles is a core concept of string theory. While string theory proposes that particles are essentially different vibrational modes of tiny strings, it's important to remember that string theory is still a theoretical framework and has yet to be experimentally confirmed.
Water's States: Water indeed exists in solid, liquid, and gas states, which are determined by temperature and pressure conditions. These changes are driven by the kinetic energy of molecules and the interactions between them.
3D Carbon-Based Substances: You're touching on the idea of molecular structures and their behavior in different dimensions. Carbon, due to its unique ability to form stable bonds with itself and other elements, leads to a vast array of molecules, including liquid gases like methane and ethane. However, the discussion of "2 strings and vibration" is an abstraction and doesn't directly reflect the complexities of molecular behavior in three dimensions.
String Theory and Gravity: String theory does indeed aim to unify quantum mechanics and gravity, which are currently described by separate theories (quantum mechanics and general relativity, respectively). However, string theory is still undergoing development and faces challenges in making testable predictions.
Dimensions of Time and Space: You're hinting at the potential influence of additional dimensions beyond our usual three dimensions of space and one dimension of time. Some theories, including string theory, propose the existence of extra dimensions that could have implications for the fundamental nature of particles and forces.
Further Research: It's crucial to emphasize that the ideas you've mentioned are in the realm of theoretical physics and require further research and experimental validation. String theory, while elegant, is still being explored, and its full implications and testable predictions are not fully realized.
In conclusion, your ideas touch on significant concepts in physics, including string theory, dimensionality, and the behavior of matter. However, it's important to distinguish between theoretical frameworks and established scientific principles. As our understanding of these theories advances and technology allows for more sophisticated experiments, we may gain deeper insights into the nature of the universe and the fundamental forces that govern it.
Thank you for your contribution
It's now my favorite channel 💖
"... everything is made of tiny vibrating strings..." Does that include dark matter and dark energy?
While string theory is an intriguing and mathematically elegant idea, it's essential to clarify that our current understanding of it is still theoretical and lacks experimental confirmation. As of now, string theory has not been definitively proven or disproven through experimentation, making it a subject of ongoing research and debate among physicists.
When it comes to dark matter and dark energy, the situation is complex. String theory has the potential to address fundamental questions about the nature of these enigmatic components of the universe. However, at present, string theory hasn't provided a conclusive explanation for them.
Dark matter is thought to be a form of matter that doesn't emit light or energy and thus cannot be directly observed. String theory offers some hypotheses regarding the nature of dark matter, suggesting that certain types of string-like objects, called "branes," could play a role in its behavior. However, these ideas are still being explored and are far from settled.
Dark energy, on the other hand, is the mysterious force responsible for the accelerated expansion of the universe. String theory has not yet provided a definitive explanation for dark energy, and the quest to understand its nature remains an open question in the field.
In summary, while the idea that everything is made of tiny vibrating strings is a fascinating concept, its application to dark matter and dark energy is still a work in progress within the realm of theoretical physics. String theory holds promise for explaining these phenomena, but it has not yet yielded concrete and universally accepted explanations. As our understanding of string theory evolves and experiments advance, we may gain insights into whether it can indeed shed light on the mysteries of dark matter and dark energy.
I hope this helps
Craig
Nothing is made of tiny vibrating strings. That's just a total misunderstanding of quantum mechanics.
I understand that research in physics and matter is both curious and necessary for some function of society. But how far do we proceed and spend our wealth to "discover" the ultimate cause of existence? Even the "lesser fleas" have smaller yet and so infinitum. Do you really think that at the end of this rabbit-hole we will open a door and God will say, "O.K, you found Me?" Not in THIS life. But one must admit that there are hidden, unexplained forces "vibrating" these strings and subatomic particles. SOME thing has to be vibrating them. WHY is there "gravity?" "Splain THAT, Lucy." "Matter" did not always exist. but at some point, it "became." Whence did it become? Until someone can satisfy my lessening curiosity -- not abandonment -- I will believe that there is an eternal force with intelligence and purpose which or who intended to bring about matter and energy (or energy before matter). The author of Genesis, Job, and the prophet Micah were NOT stupid, nor child-like. They KNEW something important. Where they got their knowing is, to many, a mystery and to others a fantasy. But if one will go outside of one's own bias and distraction, one must admit "I believe in "God..."
Earth is extremely unique in that 900-million years ago it had a high pressure carbon dioxide atmosphere much like Venus has today.The atmospheric pressure on the surface of Venus is currently1350 pounds per square inch. In other words Venus currently has 92 times more air than earth.The atmospheric pressure on Earth is currently14.7 pounds per square inch and Co2 is a trace gas at .033%. So where did early Earth’s high pressure atmosphere go?
After earth left its birthplace in Orion Earth froze up for a billion years known as the Huronian Glaciation. Earth had one continent covered with a five-mile deep coating of ice. Finally our Sun with a masses of 2e30 drifted between Sirius A and B that has a mass of 6.8e30 and Procyon A and B with a mass of 6e30 Each of these stars that aren’t from our Galaxy but were captured by it and each has a white dear orbiting them. Our Sun matched the speed of Sirius B, the size of Earth that has a mass of 3e30; 1.5 times more gravity than our Sun and we started following it around Sirius A. It was the light from those objects that allows you to drive a car and heats your home, not the Sun!
The little white dwarf star the size of Earth but 1.5 solar masses puts our more than 100-times the light of our sun in the UV spectrum. It was the light from Sirius A and B that melted the billion-year Huronian Glaciation and took Earth’s high pressure 1000 PSI CO2 atmosphere down with photosynthesis into coal, oil and limestone layers up to 12,500-feet thick.
The sun did not make our carbon resources on Earth! When you are driving your car down the road you are recycling light energy from Sirius A and B, not the Sun! Humans have been worshiping the wrong sun god for 4000 years.
All that UV light from Sirius B also modified animal and plant DNA to speeding up evolution. The sun did not burn as hot 800-million years ago as it does today so there is no way the Sun could have made our carbon energy and resources on this planet.
Our Sun was captured by Sirius A and B about 800-million years ago. We were in a nice tight orbit following Sirius B around Sirius A at eight to ten astronomical units for 750-million years.
Earth’s 1000 PSI atmosphere was taken down with photosynthesis with light from Sirius A and B into limestone layers up to 12,500-feet thick (calcium carbonates). The light from the Sirius system created vast layers of coal and oil all made by plants using light from Sirius A and B not the Sun and released free oxygen in the process.
There is only one object out there capable of getting through early earth 3000-mile deep atmosphere and that is the Sirius system and we are heading toward it a 7.5 kilometers per second. We did the orbit calculations and it matches the Ice Age cycle of 105,000 years-hence the title of the book.
Sirius B, the size of Earth and 1.5 solar masses has more gravity than the sun. We matched its speed and it put us in orbit around Sirius A. Sirius B orbits at 8 to 10 AU around Sirius A every 50-years. Sirius B puts out 100 to 1000 times the light of our sun in the UV spectrum in 350 to 400 nanometers. It’s the only object out there capable of getting through early Earth’s 1000 pound per square inch atmosphere that was over 3000 miles deep to create life “on the surface of the waters” and give us our wonderful carbon resources.
Sirius A, being 4.5 solar masses puts out four times the light of our sun in the visible light spectrum helped thaw the five-mile deep ice sheets of the billion-year Huronian Glaciation. This had to take place before non-cyclic photosynthesis could take place. When you are driving your car down the road or heating your home with coal or oil you are recycling stellar energy from Sirius A and B, not the sun!
Read: COSMOLOGICAL ICE AGES by Henry Kroll
www.HankKroll.com, www.Trafford,com, www.Amazon,com
And bookstores around the world.
Reducing carbon dioxide will kill earth.
Oswald didn’t kill Kennedy. Kennedy was shot from the front.
Metaphysical concepts are not empirically testable .Faith and beliefs are rife in science and religion leading to chaotic results.
Not worth watching. 95% of the video is working up to an explanation of string theory but the explanation is not worth waiting for. Avoid this and go to the next one from the algorithm.
not string ,but spring lol
BE A MAN OF CELIBACY
THEN START MEDITATION
YOU WILL GET ALL YOUR Q
TRUE ANSWER
MONKSHIP FIRST
WITHOUT MONK ALL KNOWLEDGE IS IMPURE OR GUESS.
GUESS IS NOT EDUCATION