I was in Mozambique, twenty years ago, and I got a lift up the coast to some place that nobody ever heard of. There had been a big storm and the sand had washed away. There was a big rock in the beach with about eighty partial fossilized hominin footprints, but one absolute perfect footprint. I took a lot of photographs and sent them to everybody when I got back to the USA and absolutely nobody was even slightly interested.
Because you probably weren't part of the academic circle. It's only historical if found by someone who's been molded by years of brainwashing and an agenda. P.S. I do believe you..
@@galenmarek384 spot on ! know about a few cases likes this in the field of archaeology P.S. you are almost invisible here.......be a good citizen and stop criticising them so openly 😂
Tnx 😂 I skipped previous video because i was sleepy and couldnt wait for the narator to get to the point or something interesting, and wanted to skip this one too
I like to think that homo species left home, went to college, party a lot and ended up in Australia. With all their knowledge and party skills, they made their way home, sharing with the world.
I believe there were more over the years before but the farmer didn't know what they were and sold the 'dragon' bones for traditional medicines. It was very fortunate there was this example for experts to recognise the importance of. I'm not sure if other bones have since been excavated in the area. There's some articles I read on you tube and new scientist magazine.
Were all of the pre-human ancestors going back 300,400,000 years ago white???? I was under the impression that the white mutation could only definitively be traced back 10,000 years and theoretically something less than a hundred thousand years. This has bugged me. Are they saying all the human predecessors are white...
This is either the slowest speaking American I’ve heard, or it’s AI. I’m thinking AI, so I’ll adjust the playback speed to something approaching normal, or drop it.
Hunting a wooly rhinoceros of the Pleistocene seems a plan made out of sheer desperation. After going to such terrible efforts would come the worst part. Eating it.
Sigh. No the genus 'homo', aka the tag 'man', was not experimenting with any evolutionary method .. he was simply being himself: a living soul (anima/ psyche) of a particularly odd kind = a moral agent, one capable of rational judgement (even down to accusing himself, recognising and accepting his guilt, in the distinction between wrong and right .. not just right and left, in developing tools and in using them thoughtfully - for good or ill). ;o)
And you have proof that our cousins had no moral framework? Chimpanzees, far behind us, have accepted norms of behaviour, the beginning of morality. I think that to exalt us over others of our genus is childishly simplistic. They were social species, and if we judge them by the behaviour of Neanderthals, as they seem more structurally akin to, they would likely have cared for their sick (as is evident further back in the fossil record. What makes you think they didn't have a moral code?
And you have proof that our cousins had no moral framework? Chimpanzees, far behind us, have accepted norms of behaviour, the beginning of morality. I think that to exalt us over others of our genus is childishly simplistic. They were social species, and if we judge them by the behaviour of Neanderthals, as they seem more structurally akin to, they would likely have cared for their sick (as is evident further back in the fossil record. What makes you think they didn't have a moral code?
@@JimBillen-h6v If you think that may help you, though I doubt it, that is up to you. No, I merely wrote a comment - and if that is weird .. I am glad you are not 'judging'. Oddly enough, mind-altering matter would very likely have been part of 'early' human development, if only as incidental to the more regular diet. God bless. ;o)
I think looking at its anatomy it is likely related to neanderthals or my personal favorite theory, IS a denisovan. But yeah, until we find more or sequence its genome we can't be sure about any theory including some extremely weird mix of disorders which coincidentally give it an anatomy like what one would expect for a neanderthal adjacent species in the area(of which we know denisovans to be exactly all of that). The way I phased it obviously shows how I see things, but the point still stands that regardless of what personally seems right to us as well as legitimate scientists, we are not yet at a stage to say anything truly certain either way.
Education is 1st. After you get a job, 1. save up 8 months rent. 2.invest in your hobby from childhood (keep it as a secret) 3. don’t buy clothing. 4.cook home (fresh only) 5. Look for “going out of business” opportunities. Life is a magic place. Take it ALL. No mercy. Party🎉on
Why is it always a man used to typify the species , were there no dragon woman , they were probably more interesting and knew where to find things better then the men and like all the human species they brought the new life into the world.
The 'hobbit' species is also described from a female. Sometimes they don't get to choose, they just go with the best specimen available at the time. In this case the only specimen was male, so what do you expect them to do?
1st: This skull is the only one of its kind that has been found, so far. 2nd: The skull belonged to a dude, heavy brow ridges, big teeth and large eye sockets. Female/ ladies features are smaller.
Wait one minute… you mean to tell me you can tell if it was a man or a woman without knowledge of their pronouns ? Well kick me in the face, I had no idea. Sarcasm Sarcasm.
![ILLSLICK - THE KING'S LANDING [Freestyle]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/feIJJnNkTfk/mqdefault.jpg)
I was in Mozambique, twenty years ago, and I got a lift up the coast to some place that nobody ever heard of. There had been a big storm and the sand had washed away. There was a big rock in the beach with about eighty partial fossilized hominin footprints, but one absolute perfect footprint. I took a lot of photographs and sent them to everybody when I got back to the USA and absolutely nobody was even slightly interested.
Because you probably weren't part of the academic circle. It's only historical if found by someone who's been molded by years of brainwashing and an agenda. P.S. I do believe you..
Womp… that’s a sad story dude. Well, I’m interested.
@@galenmarek384 spot on ! know about a few cases likes this in the field of archaeology
P.S. you are almost invisible here.......be a good citizen and stop criticising them so openly 😂
In Spain I was confronted by Spanish students working in Montana on a site saying “why were there no American students”
The lack of interest is certainly disappointing. Try again. A different archaeologist may be interested.
Highly recommend 1.25 speed boost on playback 🤗
Tnx 😂 I skipped previous video because i was sleepy and couldnt wait for the narator to get to the point or something interesting, and wanted to skip this one too
Forever in your debt.
Still not fast enough. I also can't take the weird pronunciations of the AI voice.
I like to think that homo species left home, went to college, party a lot and ended up in Australia. With all their knowledge and party skills, they made their way home, sharing with the world.
Great in depth take on a lesser known human species!
My girlfriend keeps on ,digging up the past. But she’s not an Archeologist.
I believe there were more over the years before but the farmer didn't know what they were and sold the 'dragon' bones for traditional medicines. It was very fortunate there was this example for experts to recognise the importance of. I'm not sure if other bones have since been excavated in the area. There's some articles I read on you tube and new scientist magazine.
This voice would put a glass eye to sleep.
When can we just call this guy "a denisovan." 🤷
The same time we call a Bonobo a chimpanzee..
When we find hundreds more specimens
Denisovan is a figment of genetic quackery, out of a fingertip, Denisovan was born.
Nicely done👍
A single skull (no other bones) in amazing condition. With a questionable provinence.
It may have even been found thousands of years ago
Yeah if only they can find where the original skull was actually dug up. Sounds like there's layers of infrastructure on top of it
Were all of the pre-human ancestors going back 300,400,000 years ago white???? I was under the impression that the white mutation could only definitively be traced back 10,000 years and theoretically something less than a hundred thousand years. This has bugged me. Are they saying all the human predecessors are white...
Archaeology and palaeontology is predominantly made up of Europeans or their descendants so what did you expect?
@@mr.nobody4529 and nobody calls them on that at this late stage of the game
White or monkey is all that exist to European researchers and YT narrators
nice
The music became unbearable on this one.
Try 1.5 or even two speed
Music while talking is extremely distracting.
I’m going with Homo Longsovan. Lol
You show the wrong location for NE China Plain. It is located above North Korea.
I'm definitely a robot, and even I find that AI voice creepy.
Oh yeah,, where's David Attenborough when you need him.
Sssllllooooowwwwwww!
This is either the slowest speaking American I’ve heard, or it’s AI. I’m thinking AI, so I’ll adjust the playback speed to something approaching normal, or drop it.
Speed up your video. At 2:00 he sounds real enthusiastic
Well done but why the meditative commentary style?
it's a bot
Quaaludes
Why wasn't I subbed to this channel yet?
Dragon man was likely at least 8' tall. Early Yao Ming's bigger brother
These... are giants....
Good played at 1.25 speed 😂. Why so sloooowww??
bot
Increase watch time
Every Ancient Civilizations created various kinds of man, this is the proof.
Hunting a wooly rhinoceros of the Pleistocene seems a plan made out of sheer desperation.
After going to such terrible efforts would come the worst part.
Eating it.
Wario was a Longisovan the whole time
Sigh. No the genus 'homo', aka the tag 'man', was not experimenting with any evolutionary method .. he was simply being himself: a living soul (anima/ psyche) of a particularly odd kind = a moral agent, one capable of rational judgement (even down to accusing himself, recognising and accepting his guilt, in the distinction between wrong and right .. not just right and left, in developing tools and in using them thoughtfully - for good or ill).
;o)
And you have proof that our cousins had no moral framework? Chimpanzees, far behind us, have accepted norms of behaviour, the beginning of morality. I think that to exalt us over others of our genus is childishly simplistic.
They were social species, and if we judge them by the behaviour of Neanderthals, as they seem more structurally akin to, they would likely have cared for their sick (as is evident further back in the fossil record. What makes you think they didn't have a moral code?
And you have proof that our cousins had no moral framework? Chimpanzees, far behind us, have accepted norms of behaviour, the beginning of morality. I think that to exalt us over others of our genus is childishly simplistic.
They were social species, and if we judge them by the behaviour of Neanderthals, as they seem more structurally akin to, they would likely have cared for their sick (as is evident further back in the fossil record. What makes you think they didn't have a moral code?
The fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil is forbidden to eat. So we ate it
Mushrooms? Psychotherapy maybe... Did you do something... bad? Just reale weird -not judging :-)
@@JimBillen-h6v If you think that may help you, though I doubt it, that is up to you. No, I merely wrote a comment - and if that is weird .. I am glad you are not 'judging'. Oddly enough, mind-altering matter would very likely have been part of 'early' human development, if only as incidental to the more regular diet.
God bless. ;o)
Maybe they were the same species but different race like we have today
We did have a lot more diversity back then...
There is only ONE homo long skull found? In this case, we must consider if the large shape was perhaps due to hydrocephaly or similar condition.
I think looking at its anatomy it is likely related to neanderthals or my personal favorite theory, IS a denisovan. But yeah, until we find more or sequence its genome we can't be sure about any theory including some extremely weird mix of disorders which coincidentally give it an anatomy like what one would expect for a neanderthal adjacent species in the area(of which we know denisovans to be exactly all of that).
The way I phased it obviously shows how I see things, but the point still stands that regardless of what personally seems right to us as well as legitimate scientists, we are not yet at a stage to say anything truly certain either way.
Nope
Education is 1st.
After you get a job, 1. save up 8 months rent.
2.invest in your hobby from childhood (keep it as a secret)
3. don’t buy clothing.
4.cook home (fresh only)
5. Look for “going out of business” opportunities. Life is a magic place. Take it ALL. No mercy. Party🎉on
I wonder what archeologists in the far distant future will think about homo sexuals?
All mammals are about 15% gay... sheep, dog, bonobo, horse. White people. Black people.... gay is natural
We know what the future gay archaeologists are going to think. Don't we buddy
Why does the presenter talk so funny?
Probably text to speech voice program
Likely to be an AI talking. Possibly written by someone for whom English was a second language, so used an app to turn his writing into USA English.
bot
@@pamplemouse5 Nope, this is written by an English human, and narrated by a Canadian!
All the skulls seem to be male. Didn’t they have women back then?
You never heard of Lucy?
Naah 😅
Can't stand the AI voice
Google Boskop you're welcome
Why is it always a man used to typify the species , were there no dragon woman , they were probably more interesting and knew where to find things better then the men and like all the human species they brought the new life into the world.
You are wrong. Just look at
Lucy the famous
Australopithecus afarensis
The 'hobbit' species is also described from a female. Sometimes they don't get to choose, they just go with the best specimen available at the time. In this case the only specimen was male, so what do you expect them to do?
1st: This skull is the only one of its kind that has been found, so far. 2nd: The skull belonged to a dude, heavy brow ridges, big teeth and large eye sockets. Female/ ladies features are smaller.
Elocution lessons are in order
Wait one minute… you mean to tell me you can tell if it was a man or a woman without knowledge of their pronouns ?
Well kick me in the face, I had no idea.
Sarcasm Sarcasm.