ELT: The New Telescope that could Find the Origin of the Universe

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 พ.ค. 2024
  • In Chile's Atacama Desert, men and women are building the world's largest telescope. A titanic construction site with record numbers and stakes, isolated from the rest of the world. The Extremely Large Telescope, or ELT, is being built on the summit of Cerro Armazones, a 3,000-metre-high platform in northern Chile. With a primary mirror that will be the largest in the world when it goes into service, the ELT mega-telescope will be able to travel even further into the universe, offering us unprecedented images. A veritable revolution for astronomical researchers, and one we're eagerly awaiting... That's what we're going to see today in this new episode of Looking 4. Enjoy the video.
    Looking 4 also continues on Discord and Instagram 👇
    Instagram of the channel 👇
    / instalooking4
    The Discord link to exchange with the Looking 4 community 👇 / discord
    For more videos, feel free to subscribe to the channel just below 👇
    / looking4en
    Some images are from ESO , Thanks to them!
    📽 My other royalty free images and music.👇
    ✔ 1.envato.market/x9n51R
    00:00 Location and presentation of the ELT
    02:25 VLT: Very Large Telescope
    03:43 The role of ESO: the European Southern Observatory
    04:42 ELT construction progress
    07:19 The Extremely Large Telescope: an engineering marvel
    08:03 The world's largest primary mirror
    09:52 The ELT: A revolution in astronomy
    11:38 Other megaprojects underway: GMT and TMT
    #construction #ELT #construction
    2024 Looking 4 (En) | All rights reserved.

ความคิดเห็น • 544

  • @alltogethernow121
    @alltogethernow121 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    ETERNITY - NO beginning, NO ending

  • @DataSmithy
    @DataSmithy 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

    At 7:40, the narrator says about the JWST: "It's unique position at the heart of the Milky Way allows it to send back images that redefine our image of space". Wow, I guess we have warp drive now.

    • @robertterrell3065
      @robertterrell3065 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I heard that, too. So why can't we just fly to the stars and observe them up close? LOL

    • @icosthop9998
      @icosthop9998 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Go easy on blaming it on the *"Ai"* voice.
      The voice still has to have input from humans, that was very bad reproofing by the authors of this channel.
      Like I got to reproof all my comments when I use "Talk Text" , before sending.
      Many channels are using this very Distinguish old man's "Ai" voice. 🎙

    • @bobm4378
      @bobm4378 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      we are already in 'the heart of the milky way' depending on definition ( the 'heart of the city' is not usually the 'centre' ).. JWST actully orbits the solar system, look on the NASA website for a full 3D view of it! :)

    • @richardrogers7339
      @richardrogers7339 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yess 😂

    • @icosthop9998
      @icosthop9998 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      We are no where near the center of the Milky Way. 🧐
      We are on the outer edges.
      We are further than the (Milky Way) "suburbs" , we are in a country ! 😳

  • @69ss95
    @69ss95 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Contractors are amazing people to have built such a thing!

  • @philochristos
    @philochristos 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    That's a big ole telescope. One thing you didn't mention that I think is really cool is that it's supposed to be able to correct for atmospheric distortion. I don't know exactly how it works, but somehow they point a bunch of lasers at the sky that detect the distortion, and then software makes corrections to the image in real time. It'll be pretty amazing if it works.

    • @eriktempelman2097
      @eriktempelman2097 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      This is standard practice now. E.g. the Very Large Array telescopes (not far from the ETL) already use this sort of correction. Tom Scott did a great (what else?) video on it. It also captures the ELT.

    • @la7dfa
      @la7dfa 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The laser creates "guide stars" that will be used to correct the image for distortion.

    • @catman8965
      @catman8965 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      It's called "Adaptive Optics". The primary mirror can change its shape to correct for atmospheric distortion as measured from the sodium (yellow) lasers.

    • @markdoldon8852
      @markdoldon8852 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That system (called adaptive optics does work, and is in use at almost all major telescopes worldwide for decades now. It all depends on massive computing power that can detect the 'flicker' of the light from lasers shining into the upper atmosphere and then correct the shape of the mirror by moving those (739?) hexagonal segments by microns at a time, in real time. The whole massive surface is constantly moving imperceptively to the human eye, to cancel out atmospheric disturbances. This is by far the largest application of the engineering, but it principal the system is well understood.

    • @thomaslewis7883
      @thomaslewis7883 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Good point. Imagine this telescope sitting on the far side of the Moon.

  • @Andre_XX
    @Andre_XX 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    There are a few iffy things in this video, some of which have already been mentioned by others. The telescope is not placed at the top of a mountain "to be as close as possible to the stars" 5:17. It is put there to get as far as possible out of the earth's atmosphere.

    • @OldMtnGeezer
      @OldMtnGeezer 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Exactly. A few thousand feet vs millions, or billions, of light years? There's really no measure for the absurd insignificance of that!

  • @DCGreenZone
    @DCGreenZone 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    I get "Contact" vibes from the construction photos. 😊

    • @joecausey8508
      @joecausey8508 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      A great movie!!

    • @vicsaul5459
      @vicsaul5459 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Small moves Ellie,

    • @DCGreenZone
      @DCGreenZone 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@vicsaul5459 See LPP Fusion's latest offering in here.

  • @bobcochran1925
    @bobcochran1925 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

    It would be interesting to know what capability these land-based telescopes offer that can’t be provided by Webb and other space-based technology.

    • @GRosa250
      @GRosa250 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      The James Webb telescope only collects infrared light. The Extremely Large Telescope will collect visible/near infrared light. Their capabilities are different. A better comparison would be to the proposed LUVOIR space telescope which will have up to a 50 foot primary mirror and will be capable of collecting visible, UV and infrared light.

    • @louise_rose
      @louise_rose 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@GRosa250 Hubble definitely took pictures on the visible light spectrum though, and space telescopes avoid any intrusion from the atmosphere of Earth.

    • @vanguard9067
      @vanguard9067 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      With the incredible size of the primary mirror, it’s all about light-gathering capabilities that space-based telescopes cannot deliver.

    • @la7dfa
      @la7dfa 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Not only does it provide other capabillities than WEBB, but you also need more than one observatory as the sky is big and the number of targets and projects are big.
      But ELT will also have six times the resolution of WEBB and will gain better results in many areas.

    • @robinhodgkinson
      @robinhodgkinson 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Watch Tom Scott’s video and you’ll learn a lot. He toured the place and gives a very good explanation of its capabilities and differences to other telescopes including Webb. Well worth watching... th-cam.com/video/QqRREz0iBes/w-d-xo.htmlsi=ZdiKIncFMCtychfz

  • @greggy9786
    @greggy9786 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Highly impressed of this idea to search the galaxy.

  • @dp-kz5cs
    @dp-kz5cs 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    This is so amazing, excitement is an understatement. I've been patiently waiting for news ! Its really coming along nicely ! Green Bank observatory is in my state, I wish I could go see it ❤🙏 one day I WILL! This is wondeful news ! Thank you !

  • @robertwolff3221
    @robertwolff3221 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Very professional presentation. Thank-you.

  • @oker59
    @oker59 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Ten times better resolution than four interferometric optical telescope. Maybe, but the ELT also combines all the light into one image. The four telescope interferometer doesn't combine all four to make a single image. They only combine the light for spectroscopy. When they take a picture, they take a picture with only one of them. So, it would be more accurate to compare the ELT to just one of the four optical interferometer telescope.

    • @Pharisaeus
      @Pharisaeus 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This is not true. There are imaging instruments at VLTI which can combine interference fringes to get an image - in the past AMBER and MIDI and now PIONIER and GRAVITY can do that. So no, they combine light not only for spectroscopy.
      But you are correct that it's not a 1:1 comparison because interferometry is not "magic" - not only you don't collect the same amount of light as real mirror of that size, but you also "lose" 90% of the light by bouncing it around into a single focus. As a result you might get better resolution from interferometer, but it will only work for very bright objects. ELT will be able to see significantly fainter objects.

  • @broslyons8045
    @broslyons8045 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    I glad humans build such machines-

    • @dp-kz5cs
      @dp-kz5cs 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      To be a bewilderment for future generations 😂 I wonder what this was for ? We cant read the writing ......sound familiar lol

    • @stevefromsaskatoon830
      @stevefromsaskatoon830 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Actually they're going to find the writings of folks like you two and think we were a bunch of barely literate monkeys .

  • @chirilas5217
    @chirilas5217 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    👏Excellent documentary. Congratulations.👍

  • @evanherk
    @evanherk 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    It's not high up to be closer to the stars, but to get out of the atmosphere as much as possible.

    • @johnmabary
      @johnmabary 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Both can be true because they are the same thing.

    • @evanherk
      @evanherk 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@johnmabary not at all the same thing.

    • @OldMtnGeezer
      @OldMtnGeezer 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      A few thousand feet vs millions, or billions, of light years? Staggeringly insignificant. @@johnmabary

    • @peterstratten3087
      @peterstratten3087 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I wonder if Mac Donald’s will open a branch there

  • @sanexpreso2944
    @sanexpreso2944 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I am proud that the most powerful telescopes in the world are located in Chile

  • @tigerteff015
    @tigerteff015 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Amazing science and engineering.

  • @larryslemp9698
    @larryslemp9698 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Excellent..!!

  • @bernios3446
    @bernios3446 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Excellent presentation!

    • @Looking4En
      @Looking4En  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you!

    • @Three_Random_Words
      @Three_Random_Words 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@Looking4En Is this video Ai generated, or partially ai? *I mean why at **7:44** does it says the JWST is located at the heart of the Milky Way?* Such a statement makes zero sense, and is classic 2024 Ai. That telescope is actually in a Sun-Earth L2 orbit.
      Are the replies to comments also Ai generated? Often even seemingly negative comments will generate an emoji ♥reply from the channel owner.
      I did enjoy this video overall though.

    • @FrankDijkstra
      @FrankDijkstra 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@Three_Random_Wordspretty sure it's AI. The narrator doesn't breathe during talking.

    • @Three_Random_Words
      @Three_Random_Words 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@FrankDijkstra Not this videos, but I've seen Ai bots give ❤likes to every single reply, even the negative ones.

    • @icosthop9998
      @icosthop9998 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@FrankDijkstra yes
      And many other channels are using this same *Ai Voice* .

  • @RoyChartier
    @RoyChartier 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    The JWST orbits around Earth's L2. It is not located at the center of the galaxy.

    • @Justwantahover
      @Justwantahover 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      If it was it wouldn't be there for millions of years (or longer). 😅

    • @icosthop9998
      @icosthop9998 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah, Many people under this video bringing out that mistake.

    • @icosthop9998
      @icosthop9998 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Go easy on blaming it on the *"Ai"* voice.
      The voice still has to have input from humans, that was very bad reproofing by the authors of this channel.
      Like I got to reproof all my comments when I use "Talk Text" , before sending.
      Many channels are using this very Distinguish old man's "Ai" voice. 🎙

    • @16nowhereman
      @16nowhereman 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      And I thought the JWST had somehow bent space to reach the center of the galaxy. I guess not.

  • @Rustyzip53
    @Rustyzip53 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Telescopes are not put on mountaintops to be as "close as possible to the stars". One reason they are put there is to get above all the junk that is in the atmosphere such as dust, smoke, and water vapor as possible. The stars are way too far away for a few thousand feet to make any difference whatsoever.

    • @jayaybe1
      @jayaybe1 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      When I want to get a tan, I always stand up to be nearer the sun 😊.

    • @icosthop9998
      @icosthop9998 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@jayaybe1 😂

    • @dnjj1845
      @dnjj1845 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Plus the Earth is rotating and orbiting the Sun. Then it really sounds silly.

  • @walter9724
    @walter9724 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    My neighbors son in law is an engineer from here in australia who i over there working on it and he divides his time between there and ITER The tokomak fussion reactor. The last big job he worked on was the Burj Khalifa in the UAE

  • @dumitrulangham1721
    @dumitrulangham1721 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    😮😮😮 wow that big!!! Amazing piece of engineering

  • @goldwingerppg5953
    @goldwingerppg5953 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    It seemed like this video was throwing shade at JWST, which felt odd. JWST can see the earliest light and stars forming in dust clouds that no land base or other telescopes can do. There’s no doubt ELT will be great instrument for scientists to use and they will be able to do maintenance and upgrades, but the video seemed a little insecure. The Atacama Large Millimeter Array (ALMA) is an amazing instrument too, especially when all of the telescopes come online.

    • @oldwizzy
      @oldwizzy 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      JWST is an Infrared radio telescope and, just like visible light, can NOT see through the ZOA of this Milky Way and therefore that part of the sky can NOT be viewed through this radio telescope, this completely unlike X-ray radio telescopes!!

    • @icosthop9998
      @icosthop9998 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I don't think I read into it , where they were throwing shade on JWST.
      All the *Ai* told us, is the difference and the postivies between the two.

    • @leecowell8165
      @leecowell8165 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Like it or not JWST cost a small fortune compared to this instrument and it does NOT have the resolve power as well. Now that atmospheric correction has come to the forefront ground based instruments are still a LOT cheaper AND they're repairable... two huge pluses over space based instruments residing at Lagrange points. Unfortunately placing ANYTHING ANYWHERE in space is extremely pricey.

    • @goldwingerppg5953
      @goldwingerppg5953 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@leecowell8165 We basically said the same things. JWST cost was more than a small fortune and took many years and man hours to build and deploy, however, I believe it was worth it. It can gather information no other telescope can and the technology developed to build it will help future missions to deploy scientific instruments that will help advance man’s knowledge of the universe. The more advanced telescopes built, the more tools scientists will have to study the universe, which is a very good thing in my opinion.

  • @watgaz518
    @watgaz518 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good video thanks👍

  • @smartdoctorphysicist3095
    @smartdoctorphysicist3095 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi thank you very much, great show.

  • @claudelebel49
    @claudelebel49 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What boggles my mind is how they manage to focus multiple mirrors so precisely

    • @peterstratten3087
      @peterstratten3087 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

      What boggles my mind is the fact that spiders fart 😂😂😂

  • @Thomas-yr9ln
    @Thomas-yr9ln 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Bacon littice and tomato used to be my favorite sandwich. But I did like turkey club sandwiches. They would melt in your mouth. 😊

    • @SteveTaunton
      @SteveTaunton 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You may want to tell your readers that littice comes from the moon io and is roughly equivalent to lettuce here on earth, littice is a bit sweet for me. However, each to his own.

    • @clightning300mi
      @clightning300mi 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sirius the star. th-cam.com/video/Og27UJNHOns/w-d-xo.htmlsi=mwkr0DDPnIAbf7Pr

  • @leandrokees
    @leandrokees 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Your Videos are GREAT. They image quality is spotless, the voice over is great, the topics are inspiring and the integration of 3d animations and real footage seems unsusally organic. They are, however, a tad too long. I rarely watch over 6 minutes. Not because of the length itself, but because they seem a bit repetitive. Or often promise a theme that is addressed at a later point while delivering a lot of other topics in between. I feel if u break them down in shorter videos you will have as looking at more of them :-)

  • @mikaelbiilmann6826
    @mikaelbiilmann6826 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    What's next? Ridiculously Large Telescope? Gigantuanly Large Telescope? Ludicously Large Telescope? The Sillyly Large Telescope?

    • @leotimtom6637
      @leotimtom6637 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      It will be called- `` Are You Kidding Me Telescope``.

    • @mikaelbiilmann6826
      @mikaelbiilmann6826 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@leotimtom6637 😄

    • @jamescarter8311
      @jamescarter8311 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@leotimtom6637Then “Are You F’ng Kidding Me” telescope.

    • @jmchez
      @jmchez 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Do you know that the "Overwhelmingly Large Telescope" (OWL) was an actual design. It was abandoned in favor of the ELT because (wait for it), the budget was overwhelmingly large.

    • @mikaelbiilmann6826
      @mikaelbiilmann6826 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jmchez 😅 No, I didn’t know that.

  • @phil20_20
    @phil20_20 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    It's going to be Gerard Butler in a funny hat 🧢 staring back at us, wondering how he got there. 😅

  • @ralph4879
    @ralph4879 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Amazing and wonderful technology

  • @ragnarokofborg
    @ragnarokofborg 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Anyone else immediately reminded of the "Bifröst generator/directed-energy-weapon" in Thor?

  • @alex79suited
    @alex79suited 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is extremely largely cool. Peace ✌️ 😎.

  • @alpinecenter
    @alpinecenter หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    One thing is certain. If astronomers locate a planet with conditions favorable to life, huge corporations will vie for the opportunity to exploit and pollute it.

  • @ytbpromeneur
    @ytbpromeneur หลายเดือนก่อน

    At the beginning of the project, ESO project was the OWL telescope, a telescope with a 100 m primary mirror ! Perhaps the next step with the knowledge acquired with the ELT.

  • @Pegasus4213
    @Pegasus4213 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Excellent explanation! Would that such cooperation be the complete norm for all nations.. We need to be one!

  • @thomaslewis7883
    @thomaslewis7883 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm guessing the same telescope sitting on the Moon would rewrite most of what we know about the universes deepest mysteries.

  • @jonathanchester5916
    @jonathanchester5916 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +104

    Spoiler alert - we sure are going to be upset when we discover the universe has no beginning and no end.

    • @Justwantahover
      @Justwantahover 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Then we will need a bigger telescope. The planned but scrapped 100 meter telescope. 🔭

    • @mrcommoner9596
      @mrcommoner9596 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      You are wrong. Our universe has beginning and an end. There must have creator for our universe. Like us, human, Allah creates us. Same like to our universe. Nothing can happen without a creator.

    • @allensaunders449
      @allensaunders449 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Better to know that not

    • @ArendJanV
      @ArendJanV 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      You can’t know that.

    • @waskus
      @waskus 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

      ⁠@@mrcommoner9596allah dosnt exist😂
      Religion is pure sci-fi and fiction.

  • @Estenberg
    @Estenberg 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I often hear the phrase "Bigger is Not always Better". But in This Case - Bigger Definitely IS".

  • @8Junio76
    @8Junio76 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    🇨🇱🔭

  • @very..angry..man..
    @very..angry..man.. 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The earth is midway between the edge of the milky way and the centre. In the Orion Cygnus arm

  • @Alachua03
    @Alachua03 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What exactly do "scientists in a frenzy" look like? Is their hair on fire? LOL!

  • @808-PFH-Kanaka-Rights
    @808-PFH-Kanaka-Rights หลายเดือนก่อน

    if this is so, then the protest against TMT can finally come to an end for TMT would no longer be needed. native hawaiian elders can finally lay at peace knowing that they succeeded protecting Mauna kea and protecting what is left on that mountain.

  • @ioanbota9397
    @ioanbota9397 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I like it

  • @thomascoleman6322
    @thomascoleman6322 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Mother Nature truly is a cruel mistress… she creates beautiful masterpieces of terra forma (Atacama desert) and yet within that beauty, lies deadly traps 😕🤔

  • @jaimephoto
    @jaimephoto 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    great video and i'm excited about the ELT! However, JWST isn't located at the heart of the Milky Way 🤔

  • @ar-visions
    @ar-visions 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    i wonder how advances in machine learning can play a role in laser correction effectiveness through the atmosphere. we could auto label with simulations on turbulence volumes. at runtime, we could use this to unwarp the image and know what parts are more accurately known in a given moment.

    • @kahvac
      @kahvac 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I would imagine the difference would be night and day !

    • @dumitrulangham1721
      @dumitrulangham1721 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hopefully it will give us clear image of the cosmos and the planets

    • @Pharisaeus
      @Pharisaeus 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'm not sure what exactly you mean - this is already exactly what happens with AO and laser guide stars. 1000 times per second the disturbance of the guide stars are measured and mirror correction is applied.

  • @weltraumaffe4155
    @weltraumaffe4155 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    They should have named it "The Really Big Big Big Telescope".

    • @atlantic_love
      @atlantic_love 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Biggus Dickus Telescopus :D

    • @fisterB
      @fisterB 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Magnificent constructions but the terrible names are the stuff of legends. Remember the planned and cancelled OWL? Overwhelmingly Large Telescope.

    • @mpetersen6
      @mpetersen6 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nah, they should have named the Acme Telescope and used Willy Coyote peering through a telescope as the logo. 😉

    • @Justwantahover
      @Justwantahover 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They were planning to build a 100 meter telescope. I think it was going to be called the Overwhelmingly Large telescope. 😅

    • @mpetersen6
      @mpetersen6 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Justwantahover
      At some time in the future I foresee telescopes built in space on the order of a kilometer or more. Light gathering and images capable of seeing weather patterns in the atmospheres of planets circling other sun's. I don't expect them to be easy to build or operate. The imaging and focusing will be challenging. I would also expect them to very slow to change from one target star to another.

  • @robertfontaine3650
    @robertfontaine3650 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It's a shame we can't get telescopes this size up above the atmosphere. A wonderful beast.

    • @jamescarter8311
      @jamescarter8311 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      SpaceX will herald in the era of giant space telescopes and giant spacecraft in general.

    • @bobm4378
      @bobm4378 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      the 'nautilus array' will have an effective area 80 times the JWST :)

  • @Exohumanity67
    @Exohumanity67 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Elt and magellan will reveal good things for the universe

  • @deanschulze3129
    @deanschulze3129 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    How do they supply the site with water? Are there wells or do they have to truck the water in and store it?

    • @icosthop9998
      @icosthop9998 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Truck water in.

    • @larryslemp9698
      @larryslemp9698 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Rest assured pal.....they got that covered!!

    • @Agustin_R
      @Agustin_R หลายเดือนก่อน

      Trucks, the well would need to be like 500 meters deep to encounter some water with a lot of minerals and fossils

  • @17cmmittlererminenwerfer81
    @17cmmittlererminenwerfer81 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    7:44 - "Its unique position at the heart of the Milky Way enables it to send back images"
    Uh, no... the JWST *IS NOT* in the center of our galaxy, geniuses.

  • @lauracroft6977
    @lauracroft6977 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bout time.

  • @upperccutt
    @upperccutt 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    We may regret wanting to know.

  • @lauracroft6977
    @lauracroft6977 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    America needs to build a giant telescope on the dark side of the moon.

  • @moremoola
    @moremoola 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

    It'll be absolutely amazing to find other planets with life on it, which is only a matter of time.
    The problem however is not being able to reach them...
    Even if we could travel at the speed of light.

  • @viralsheddingzombie5324
    @viralsheddingzombie5324 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Looking for a physical point as the origin of the universe is pointless, because it no longer exists in our spatial dimensions.

  • @DiceyJJ
    @DiceyJJ 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Let’s get some RADIO telescopes in the L2 range…for some clear “signals”

  • @Marc816
    @Marc816 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Will it be better than the JWST?

    • @sentientflower7891
      @sentientflower7891 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Better is not a meaningful term since the JWST sees things this telescope cannot see.

    • @icosthop9998
      @icosthop9998 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@sentientflower7891 true

    • @icosthop9998
      @icosthop9998 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @Marc816
      Watch the video again. They pointed out many of the different capabilities and differences between the two telescopes.

  • @alexciocca4451
    @alexciocca4451 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What it will find is dark matter is Oreo cookies without the iceing

  • @mariuquidiello
    @mariuquidiello 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Do we really need that if we have the Hubble telescope and the James Webb Space Telescope ?

    • @kahlesjf
      @kahlesjf 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Cheaper to maintain. Also, the available use of a particular telescope is finite. Scientists and graduate students around the world submit applications for time on the limited number of telescopes that exist. Once accepted, they often have to wait a long time for the slot they are awarded. And why use orbiting satellites for things that a ground-based telescope can perform?

  • @kirk902
    @kirk902 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Perhaps there are millions of universes.

  • @IDontBuyIt50
    @IDontBuyIt50 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The very idea that man acknowledges our existence as a cosmic eye-blink's worth of time, yet we keep saying dumbass things like in one eye blink we've figured out how the whole thing began, its so beyond ridiculous I can't help but be totally annoyed when I hear it. No, there is no telescope that will ever reveal the origin of the universe, so stop asking.

    • @icosthop9998
      @icosthop9998 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      True. The only thing these telescopes can do , is see further into the universe than we were able to see before, that's it ❕️

  • @MrGarrych
    @MrGarrych 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Be able to get a good look at those StarLink satellites.

    • @MountainFisher
      @MountainFisher 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I see them in my 6 inch telescope. Early evening while they're still in the Sun's light you can see them from a fairly dark sky site without even binoculars. In Winter when it is dark by 6:30 if you get away from city lights you can see them up until 830 or so.

  • @alexlabs4858
    @alexlabs4858 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What are they gonna name the next one? The unbelievably large telescope?

    • @SteveTaunton
      @SteveTaunton 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      McDonalds has been awarded the contract for that. They are leaning toward the Mcnormace. Taco Bell came close. They were going to call it the TACO (TOTALLY AWESOME COLLIMATED OBSERVATORY)

  • @kuileesalangdron8462
    @kuileesalangdron8462 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Lol! We live in an experiment under a dome! Lol

  • @dougg1075
    @dougg1075 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Imagine if we could put that on the moon.

  • @chrisfrancis6101
    @chrisfrancis6101 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ah yes the search of the folly! We will never know this in our life time unless the aliens tell us its so!! Lol come on guys!!

  • @albertotripoli7276
    @albertotripoli7276 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How does it compare with JWST ?

  • @dragansavic39
    @dragansavic39 หลายเดือนก่อน

    1.5 billon of dollars !!!!!! That huge amount of money Pentagon spends in less than a day !

  • @moejaime2654
    @moejaime2654 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    AMAZING TELESCOPE !!! FARTED OOPS THAT WAS A SHART !!

  • @16nowhereman
    @16nowhereman 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The James Webb Space Telescope has given us evidence that there is no life in the Universe. Now all the new technologically advanced telescopes will give us more evidence that we are alone in the Universe.

  • @brucefulper4204
    @brucefulper4204 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Well it's neat and all, but can it see the footprints on the moon? ~~~~~~~~ (kidding)

  • @Larrythebassman
    @Larrythebassman 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ❤❤❤❤ my God it is beautiful to be human and look at these toys. Look at these toys. I can’t wait to take a tour in a tour bus to go to the site. Have some chips and look through the telescope. Ha ha ha ha ha ha I love this technology. Thank you for making this video.

  • @ronleight9341
    @ronleight9341 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    So when they say 2028, they really mean the early to mid 2040's!

    • @leecowell8165
      @leecowell8165 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes but much better later than never.

    • @icosthop9998
      @icosthop9998 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yep , Putting the JWST into space was like at least a twelve year overrun . 😒

    • @bobm4378
      @bobm4378 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@icosthop9998 well they are sending a bigger better one to follow JWST, does visible light too!!

  • @freddyl56
    @freddyl56 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So you’re spoiling it for us all? Thanks, i was watching

  • @hclau218
    @hclau218 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Everytime avtekescope is built, Clickbait conmen will declare "we will discover tge origin of the Universe"..😅😅

  • @petervisor
    @petervisor 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    They didn’t have to decapitate a mountain to build that

  • @laurancedoyle4231
    @laurancedoyle4231 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    "In order to be closer to the stars ..." is not the reason for building the observatory at the top of a mountain - it is so there's the least amount of atmosphere to look through.

  • @Kulumuli
    @Kulumuli 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Maybe the biggest ever telescope to be constructed on earth. I guess eventually there will be bigger telescopes in space.

  • @jamescarter8311
    @jamescarter8311 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Its successor will be called “If Your Mom Was a Telescope.”

  • @harryape9059
    @harryape9059 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Before Musk sets his sights on The Red Planet, perhaps he should figure out how to keep his cars from catching fire.

  • @ronkempke6673
    @ronkempke6673 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    As long as it's trapped under our atmosphere, its results will be limited.

  • @p42uynot59
    @p42uynot59 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    How can an Earth Bound telescope be any better then the JWST (James Webb Space Telescope)??
    I'm sure it'll be great, but I'd rather we put something like this in space,,,, maybe the Darkside of the moon.

  • @normanmerrill1241
    @normanmerrill1241 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks….

  • @Rocky-xx2zg
    @Rocky-xx2zg 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Where did the funding for this come from?

  • @walkabout16
    @walkabout16 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The bigger they make it, the further they see,
    Does it go on for eternity? Let's decree:
    In the heart of the cosmos, where time and space blend,
    Our quest for knowledge may never end.
    Through nebulae, galaxies, and the cosmic sea,
    The ELT gazes, as far as could be.
    Does it go on for eternity? We yearn to know,
    In the dance of the cosmos, in its eternal flow.
    The bigger they make it, the deeper we peer,
    Into the cosmic frontier, with hope and fear.
    Does it go on for eternity? The stars hold the key,
    In the silent symphony of the cosmic spree.
    So, here's to the ELT, our sentinel of the night,
    The bigger they make it, the closer we're to the light.
    Does it go on for eternity? Time will decree,
    In the grand cosmic theatre, the final spree.

  • @darrenluck2612
    @darrenluck2612 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I thought that's why Web is in outer space, to prevent distortion from our atmosphere?

    • @leecowell8165
      @leecowell8165 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's only one huge advantage (largely removed by laser based atmospheric correction). JWST also records 24/7 (while ELT will only be available for much shorter time periods after complete darkness). Also for about 40 nights/year ELT nighttime is too cloudy. ELT has several huge advantages though. For one this instrument is a lot cheaper. And its repairable. And its resolution will blow JWST away due to its gigantic mirror sizes (ELT's secondary mirror is almost as large as JWST's primary mirror!). Finally it has a much, MUCH longer lifespan (unless at some juncture in the JWST gets serviced at Lagrange). I believe servicing by then (about 19 years from now) will be superfluous as the instrument will have outlived most of its usefulness.

    • @Pharisaeus
      @Pharisaeus 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      JWST is in space mostly to observe in deep infra-red, which cannot be done from the ground because Earth's atmosphere absorbs it.

  • @richardmercer2337
    @richardmercer2337 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Next Generation -- SRLYWBI -- "So Ridiculously Large You Won't Believe It"

  • @danmimis4576
    @danmimis4576 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This one has a diameter of 39m = 13*3. The JWST has a D = 6.5m = 13/2 and 2028 = 13*156, so 13 again, 3 times‼ What's going on⁉ Don't tell me that the Grand Opening will be on a Friday 13 ...

  • @laurancedoyle4231
    @laurancedoyle4231 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The James Webb telescope is not at the heart of the Milky Way. It's in orbit around the Earth, which is in the outskirts of the Milky Way.

  • @user-ti3rx8ur3y
    @user-ti3rx8ur3y 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ❤สมนึก สุนันท์(7)😊😮

  • @jeffhgv
    @jeffhgv 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Each time a better telescope becomes available , the further back in time. I Don’t believe the Big Bang theory either. 😊

  • @carlstaude8576
    @carlstaude8576 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Space is to big to assess its timeless and bigger than we think.

  • @keithlincoln1309
    @keithlincoln1309 6 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    If you think this is impressive, try putting a telescope on the other side of the moon.

  • @davidmayhew8083
    @davidmayhew8083 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Where was the tribe when the other telescopes were built? Certainly a mountain as big as this can accommodate a few tekescopes. Why cant they "see" it as a huge positive! The eyes of the universe!

  • @catman8965
    @catman8965 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    WHERE'S THE RESTROOM?

  • @Justwantahover
    @Justwantahover 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The mirror is 39 meters wide and a B-double is only 25 meters long. 😅

  • @holz_name
    @holz_name 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    astronomers have the best names. We build a very large telescope, what should we name it? Lets name it the Very Large Telescope. A few years go by. We build an even larger telescope than the VLT, what should we name it? Lets name it the Extremely Large Telescope. More years go by. We build an even larger telescope than the ELT what should we name it? We name it the Fantastically Large Telescope.

  • @kadiummusic
    @kadiummusic 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    But it still can't find the Apollo landings! 😁😁😁

    • @bobm4378
      @bobm4378 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      its looking for planet sized stuff, not some thing 127560 times smaller...