Prospect Theory Explained at 5 Levels of Difficulty

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 มิ.ย. 2024
  • Follow me:
    Behavioral Science Instagram: @petebitsofficial
    Instagram: @petejudo
    Twitter: @petejudo
    LinkedIn: Peter Judodihardjo
    Prospect Theory Paper 1979: www.uzh.ch/cmsssl/suz/dam/jcr...
    Repeated Markets Paper 2003: citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc...
    Join Shortform for amazing book summaries, 20% off the annual subscription with my link: www.shortform.com/pete
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 24

  • @PeteJudo1
    @PeteJudo1  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The scaling of my x axis is a bit weird, but hope you guys still understood it!

    • @pescadorbrent
      @pescadorbrent 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      yeah, the scale of the graph was off. in general, that first difference between the +1 or -1 should have 4X 'sucky' than awesome. But, I really liked your 5 levels of explanation, especially the new information on how we get better at being rational when we make the decision multiple times, i.e. the curves become more similar after we've made the same investment or gambling decision several times and we've experienced the loss several times. Thanks for pointing that out!

  • @AndysJackson
    @AndysJackson 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    How do your videos not get more views?!?!? They're so well produced and informative.

    • @PeteJudo1
      @PeteJudo1  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks dude!

  • @MarkStanley57
    @MarkStanley57 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    I like the idea of explaining something at different levels! Even though it is the same underlying concept, there is an 'aha!' moment with each new level. Well done!

    • @PeteJudo1
      @PeteJudo1  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Cheers Mark! Got the idea from another channel called wired, it’s a great format!

  • @rayeza48
    @rayeza48 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    your videos are really helping me in a school project about behavioural econ ! thanks a lot !

  • @ezy_012
    @ezy_012 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks Pete, this helped me a lot understanding the Prospect theory! Great Video!

  • @piotrlipinski6274
    @piotrlipinski6274 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    On top of the informative content, the video also made me laugh!! Loved it, keep it up!

    • @PeteJudo1
      @PeteJudo1  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks Piotr!

  • @rohanpatel3476
    @rohanpatel3476 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    very well explained!

  • @fayashussain3031
    @fayashussain3031 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very well explained.

  • @Lina-gr4dy
    @Lina-gr4dy 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sir you explained really well......lots of respect and love from Pakistan 😇

  • @diegowang9597
    @diegowang9597 ปีที่แล้ว

    did you not mention the value function at all? I wonder if you can use the value function and loss aversion to explain insurances and lotteries.

  • @MonicaFriendHub
    @MonicaFriendHub 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So what kind of models can we use for a more repeated choice? Can we use the same model but change some parameters or something? Or can we get some data of a certain group for a certain behavior and use these data to get their specific parameters?

  • @pengliu2558
    @pengliu2558 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very good video to introduce the high level idea of prospect theory. Just wandering if you can provide some papers related to the last part, saying people would be shifted from prospect theory framework to a rational model after the learning process? Thank you

    • @PeteJudo1
      @PeteJudo1  ปีที่แล้ว

      In description!

  • @peterelpanda5049
    @peterelpanda5049 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fantastic explanation, loved it!!!!

    • @PeteJudo1
      @PeteJudo1  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks Peter!

  • @JOHNSMITH-ve3rq
    @JOHNSMITH-ve3rq ปีที่แล้ว

    Absolutely was not a different explanation for different levels!!

  • @izzyc1570
    @izzyc1570 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I like your video, however at the graduate level you should have actually shown the assumptions behind Von Neumann Morgenstern expected utility and how prospect theory generalized it with a reference point to a status quo and weighting function for the probabilities.

  • @udiibgui2136
    @udiibgui2136 ปีที่แล้ว

    but wouldnt 1000000 hurt way more than 100000?

    • @PeteJudo1
      @PeteJudo1  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It would depend on who you are, and how much money you have. For a poor person, they may be almost equally devastating because the chance of recovering it is nought either way. Similarly for a very rich person, say Jeff Bezos. Losing 100 thousand and losing 1 million might feel equally insignificant.

  • @affansiddhiqui3739
    @affansiddhiqui3739 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    "the were obviously, the original labels used for Nobel prize winning paper" 😂
    Also whats your twitter handle