I stumbled across your video while browsing youtube for tips on vintage nikkor lenses. Certainly wasn't expecting a fantastic class in beginner lens basics. Although I knew almost all the concepts you discussed, it is all a lot clearer now. And what a relief it is to listen to you talk about photography without irrelevant ranting like a few famous others. Subscribed and looking forward to a lot more knowledge from you.
Just ran into this video. When you started talking I suddenly sat up straight. You reminded me of my professor. You explain things very clearly and simply. Highly recommended for new photographers.
Wow, I just bought a Nikon D3500 as a starter camera and searched for some videos about the lenses and this by far was the most informative and helpful. Thanks!
Thank you so much for the clear overview Maarten, I knew most of it, but you have the gift of being a good teacher, keeping things simple, add the right images to the story, and also being somewhat understated entertaining. That's refreshing these days. Thumbs up!
I bought the older Nikon 16-85 at the time for my d5100. I now use it on my d7200. I would recommend it to any Dx shooters. I presume the newer 16-80 is just as good. I've a number of primes which I never use ( the zooms have the flexibility, these don't). I will admit the quality of the images is superior. Cheers E
This might be one of the best videos on the basics of lenses I've ever seen, and I wasn't even looking for it. Decided to get into photography after being inspired by a few automotive photographers and I'm trying to decide on which lens to get next. This has been super helpful, thank you.
Most of the gear you look at or review, I will probably never use, yet I watch every single one of your vids. Thank you for the quality vids and I look forward to more in the future!
Great video! My favorite lens for the d5500/d5600 is the Nikon DX 35mm f/1.8 G. The field of view is perfect for street photography (about 52mm), and it's a great little lens for under $200. I like the 50mm, but it shrank the field of view to a point that was just to narrow for my taste, so I only use it on my FX nowadays.
@@sarajordie how's the performance of nikkor 16-80mm f/2.8 lens you have? I ask you this question because I have plan to by also same this nikkor lens 16-80mm f/2.8-4E. Thanks in advance
THANK YOU! this was very helpful. I just bought a D3300 and I know very little about DSLR cameras. I am mainly interested in Video shooting and your video had a lot of useful information! I learned a lot!
That's very kind of you to say, thanks - but I have exactly the right number of subscribers. And I continue to rely on a natural and organic growth based on posting videos that are detailed and honest.
Maarten, Very clear, crisp explanation. Thank you. May I request your video on, "How would the photo quality differs in the cases of Basic(or semi-pro) DSLR with great lens and prof-DSLR with cheaper lenses?"
Thanks, I appreciate your kind words - and your good suggestion. I'd rather have an entry level DSLR with a top of the line lens than the other way around. The way I see it, many good cameras are spoiled by cheap kit lenses.
@@neilpiper9889 While I agree with your approach, and keeping the filters to a common diameter is good if you can do it, I don't imagine that anyone enjoys being called stupid.
Great video - thank you! I recently bought a Nikon 16-80 2.8-4 and truly love it. I've had a couple lenses that were more expensive in the 'close to same' zoom range and in my very humble opinion like this lens better. I really like the crispness of the images taken with this lens. Thanks again for the vid.
Hi Marteen, I am confused between the Nikon D610 and the Nikon D750. The D610 is available with a 50mm f/1.8 and battery pack WiFi adapter for 900 USD while the D750 body only is available for 1200 USD. Which camera is a better buy?
That depends. As the image quality is similar, unless you know that there are one or more features on the D750 that you will use, you should choose with your wallet and your hand (which fits better).
Hi Maarten. Very informative and useful. I have the D5500 . It came with the kit lenses 18 - 55mm and 55 - 300mm kits lenses. I agree with what you say. I have added the 50mm 1.8. Excellent lens for the money. Great for portraits and in low light. I would like to add the 10 - 24mm. As for the camera, live view and the touch screen, with the ability to see the camera settings more clearly than a small window on top of the camera is a real bonus for someone who needs reading glasses. Regards. - Ron (Scotland)
You can also have a 35mm DX 1.8G which have a wider angle and can be used as an everyday lens. And there is the new AF-P 10-20 VR an affordable wide angle lens!
Can 50mm nikkor lens be used to shoot indoor low light shots and if so then how is the result and can it be used with nikon D3400 and how is the portrait shots if i use with nikon D3400.
I learned alot on this 1 video about lenses, first i was so confused what lens should i buy for my d3400, i was confused by DX and VX and now all the questions on my mind about lenses are done.
Thanks for the video, just bought a D5600 to replace my stalwart D40. With that ive never used anything other than the stock lens so very interesting to have a clear explanation on the differences before I buy.
i think you should make a video explaining how a beginner photographer such as myself would read, use and understand lens charts such as dxomark and the like... great work on these vids very usefuk in terms of understanding and practice. thanks
Thank you for your very kind words, and your confidence, much appreciated. That is an excellent suggestion. However, I too am not clear on how to interpret those charts, I only understand that higher numbers are better (I think?). I will give this suggestion some further thought though.
I wish i watched this before i even bought my first dslr.. now i have lenses that i rarely use because over time my preferences changed.. thanks for this very informative video
Awesome video to learn about lenses. I am just entering the photography world. Can you make a video on the adapters that can be used on nikon bodies for canon and sony lenses, if possible?
I can summarize that video in a couple of sentences. Nikon and others make many excellent lenses for the Nikon F mount. No adapter made can match the ease of use offered by a native lens. Does that cover it?
Hi Maarten, really enjoying your helpful videos. I have seen cars being photographed looking down on the bonnet {hood} and the engine is visible while the bonnet is down, I am wondering if you have a video regarding this on how to actually do this.
Thank you very much for your explanatory video! The comparison was very clear, and even though I couldn't totally understand the numbers in the begin of the video, I got the gist of the it! I am changing my D3200 by either a D5600 or a Canon 750D. As I already have a 50-200mm, and I love to shot portraits on 200mm, that has weighted in favor of the getting the D5600, so I can keep the lenses. If possible, I would like to know your opinion about what do you think make a better set for everyday photography and portraits: the Canon 750D + 18-55mm + 50mm (prime lens f/1.8) or the Nikon D5600 + 18-55 + 50-200mm. Thanks!
Neither of those kit lenses are worth owning. What is behind your decision to upgrade to a new camera? Would you be equally happy just purchasing a better lens - for example, a nice 85mm prime will do more to improve your portrait quality than a new camera.
The D3200 got dust and few grains of sand inside while I shooting photos close to a helicopter in Italy. Fortunately the camera was insured, and I took the camera to a Nikon authorized assistance point to remove the dust/sand without worrying about cost. However, they decided to reimburse the equivalent of the price of the camera rather than fix it. I am not particularly worried about getting a weather sealed camera this time, because the circumstances where the camera got damaged were rather unusual and I don't think I will be using the new camera on a situation where weather sealing will play a major role. Another option I thought considering was a 77D. I could get it by about the same price of the 750D, but would come with no lens - only the body. In that case I would get a second hand 18-55mm STM lens to use the camera initially. The 750D, on the other hand, would come with a 18-55mm and a 50mm f/1.8.
Newer 18-55mm lenses have a 55mm filter diameter and no manual switches for A/M and VR selectors. As for the AF-P, any 2016+ Nikon will be compatible with them OOtB. Cameras from 2015 such as the d3300, d5300, and d7200 will need a firmware upgrade to be fully compatible. Keep in mind that the d7200 will NOT have a firmware-based VR switch, so VR will be always on in the d7200. I have a d7200 and my lenses are: Prime: AF-P DX 35mm f1.8G General Purpose: AF-S DX 18-105mm f3.5 (this one is quite heavy) Telephoto: AF-P DX 70-300mm f4.5
Thank you sir for this video. For wildlife photography if I use Nikon D5600 with 70-300 AF-P FX Lens Or if I use 18-300 FX AF-P Lens what will be better . Inspite of these I expect your suggestions .
Actually I had read a blog which said: The new lens is made in Nikon’s factory in Thailand and its build quality is much as you’d expect for a mid-range lens. Size-wise it’s a good match for the D7100 body that was supplied with the lens for this review but would probably be a bit ungainly on smaller D5500 or D3300 bodies.
That's a very good video! I would also recommend (for Nikon APSC beginners) the 35mm F1.8 which is VERY cheap but very good and also lightweight. In addition to that a used Nikon 10-24 or Tokina 11-20mm. If the 16-80 is too expensive, you can also go with a Sigma 17-70. One of the best ASPC lenses on the market is the Sigma 18-35mm, but it is also expensive and heavy. The old Nikon 17-55 is also very good (and cheap when you buy it used) but weights a lot. For travelling the cheap 18-200 Tamron is good if you are price sensitive. Always think about what you want to do with your camera and if weight is important (travelling, hiking, ...). --> And you can save a lot money when you buy used lenses!
Your videos are most informative. What do you think of the Nikkor 18mm-300mm? It's appealing because I'd carry only one lens instead of the 18mm-55mm and the 55mm-300mm.
Thank you so much for the impressive clip ! I have Nikon D5300 and would like to upgrade my outdated kit lens , but still puzzled between Nikon 18-300 or Tamron 18-400. I'm mainly interested in taking nature photos. Which one do you recommend sir :) ?
Very informative. Thanks for the video. A quick question: With my current budget, I can either go with D7200 with 18-140mm OR go buy an inferior body like D5300 with 18-140mm and spend the deference on a basic prime lens like 50mm f/1.8 (or 35mm f/1.8 maybe?). Which way would you go for?
Thanks, I appreciate the kind words. I'd take the less expensive body and the better lens. A less expensive model still has a good sensor (and better than the kit lens can take advantage of) just fewer features.
The 35mm is a 50mm on full frame too? The problem I have is dealing with 2x crop factor - even with a speedbooster its only a a 1.42x crop factor and I'm at the point where I'm messing around with adapting an E-mount focal reducer to work with a m43 speedbooster for an effective 1.01x where even if it doesnt work out it'll work on the b-roll camera I'm getting. Could you make a suggestion on which you would pick between a Sony NEX 5N/5R 7 and a Sony a3000 - I'm leaning towards the 5N/5R which cost $150/180 respectively with their 25k iso but the 7 is $240 and gets an extra 8mp at 24mp and the a3000 puts me at 20mp for around $200. I do feel that a3000 is a little leaned out and bulky, and I don't know how well the cheaper plastic feel will settle with me. I think maybe there isn't enough of a difference between the second and third generation 5 to warrant the extra $30 so do I want to pay an extra $100 for an electronic viewfinder and +8mp? Or am I missing something about NEX 7?
Mind you I'm using it mostly for film and don't want to usurp my gx85 with 4k and Dual IBIS... And sure I could get a used a6000 but I want something in "excellent" condition, not "well used."
Nearly all manufacturers specify the focal length based on full frame. On a full frame camera, 35mm is 35mm. And after that I'm confused, as your comments don't seem to relate to this video.
I do know that -- although I do kind of wish lenses were all called by their 35mm equivalent so I didn't have to remember format in order to do an equation in my head for everything - m43 is easy enough with it just being double but having to do this in my head until I memorize it is a pain: (F÷2)3 And I use a series of c-mount lenses too and don't even bother - I just know that my 4.8mm 2/3" lenses are ultra wide and fast and my 8-48mm f1.0 is even faster, parfocal, gives me the widest zoom range of any lens I have, and it's very very sharp. So further off the rails and back to tying this back in - I guess I misheard what you were saying about the full frame 35mm on full frame, and your part about crop sensors and effective/actual focal lengths is what got me started writing, where I was watching this while researching 35mm lenses. I'm comparing them to 28mm lenses and trying to figure out if I should go out of my way to get some of my 50mm lenses counterparts in 35mm over 28mm - for instance a Nikkor 28mm f3.5 can be had on the cheap - the 35mm not so much and its the same for just about every fast 50mm prime I have minus my Zeiss Pancolar f1.8 & f2(these are far more expensive in general it seems and so I look at Russian clones instead) and Vivitar(which is pretty reasonable all the way around). So with dealing with focal lengths and crop factors, different sensor sizes and lens adapters I started thinking I'm working really hard on trying to achieve something that is much easier when you have an APS-C sensor, and trying to figure out how to fill focal length holes in my lens collection would stop being such a chore and fiscally unreasonable: buy a Sony NEX camera and a focal reducer for it, then take the number of lenses I have, multiply them by 1.5 and now thats the amount of focal lengths I have at my disposal. So a 35mm lens is a very different lens to an SLR user, a DSLR user and a m43 user, focal reducers double what the crop sensors are capable of capturing and I like having options. So ya this no longer really pertains to this video aside from you briefly talking DX and FX differences and you having reviewed some(if not all) of the cameras I have in question.
Hi.. I have d5100 and I use it for family photographs indoor and outdoor. I am looking for a budget but fair quality zoom lens with a zoom range at least upto 300mm. In future it is possible that I may upgrade to full frame body (in 5-7 years). So I am confused between AF-S DX Nikkor 55-300mm F/4.5-5.6G ED VR & 70-300 mm f/4.5-5.6 G AF-S VR IF-ED. Moreover there is AF-P NIKKOR 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6E ED VR f/34-8 which is not compatible with my present body but better than 70-300 mm f/4.5-5.6 G AF-S VR IF-ED. Please guide me. Thanks
If you are planning to go to full frame, you'll need an FX (not DX) lens. I haven't used it, but this looks like a good choice. bhpho.to/2C66cBb. However, it does not have a very wide aperture and ramps when zooming. If you can be satisfied with 200mm, you will find lenses with wider apertures that don't ramp.
@@egogreen2045 The two shots were taken with two different lenses, with the same settings. What this example shows is that one lens is of higher quality than the other.
Thanks, I appreciate the kind words. There are some Nikon body/lens combinations that can't adjust the aperture in live view mode. I thought, when I reviewed the D5500 that the difference was an "E" in the lens model name th-cam.com/video/esc0PNAh9-k/w-d-xo.html. However, the lack of E (as I learned in later reviews) did not mean that it would not work. I think that this lens will likely not support aperture adjustment in live view - but you'd have to check to be certain.
Thanks man, I appreciate it. I thought because it had a ED it my work. I think I'll buy a Sigma 17-50 mm F2,8 EX DC OS HSM, I have a 24-70mm2.8 which I love but does not have AF motor, and the D5500 has no focus pecking tools for M focus, you think that the Sony A7 III focus pecking works with an old Nikon lens like that with adapter of course?? Thank you very much.
I'm always happy to help. "ED" (a glass coating) and "E" are not the same. Focus peaking is generally a function of the sensor/processor and is lens independent - so yes, that combination will work. Peaking can be useful for manual focus, but I do prefer an expanded view, which is available on the D5500.
Thanks for your video. Having a D3400 , and a prime 50mm as well as 18-55mm , what other lens you would suggest me to get? I was thinking about the new 18-300mm but it seems it's more day to day photography rather than a bit more pro. Also, I am thinking to do photography more professional and will this might make me to change my camera and buying new lenses would be pointless? also, if i wanna do more modelling apart 50mm for having a big angel and good shot what lens would be better? I'd appreciate your advice. I know I got a lot of questions! :)
Always a pleasure to read kind words from my viewers - and to answer their questions. It's hard to suggest a lens without knowing what you're trying to accomplish. For landscape/architecture, maybe a wider lens; for wildlife and birds, maybe a longer zoom; for closeup work a macro lens is very useful ...
@@MaartenHeilbron Thanks for your reply. I just had a look at macro lenses and it's really difficult to choose among all the lenses. I am kinda lost now :/ :)
Always happy to help. With macro lenses, the smallest focal length (like under 50) will require you to work very close to the subject. The longer lengths (over 80) you are too far to reach the object at arm's length (but that's what you want for insects on flowers, etc. Hope this helps.
Hello Maarten, great review. I only did not understand one thing and that is would 50mm f1.8 FX be too much croped on the nikon d3400 DX ? Thank you so much for knowledge and skills which you give us for free!
Thanks for your kind words, they are appreciated. On a DX body, the 50mm lens would give you the same field of view as a 75mm (approximately) lens on an FX body. Is that too much?
Well, as a beginner I really think that I do not have correct vision of how it goes to look like.. but something what I really like on 50mm except bokeh is that I can be far from subject (when I shoot portrait)and for other things I have 18-55mm and it's really great lens, but I am still thinkig above 50FX and 35DX on my dx camera....
Great channel with great videos and good explanation! As a beginner, this helps me a lot in making a decision for my 2nd Nikon DX Lens. THANK YOU SIR! :)
I enjoyed this video. I had a Nikon D7000 using a Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR II as the "kit" lens and a Nikon AF-S VR Zoom-Nikkor 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G IF-ED as a "wildlife" lens. I recently bought a Nikon D500 with the AF-S DX NIKKOR 16-80mm f/2.8-4E ED VR "kit" lens. I have ordered a Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 50mm f/1.8G "prime" lens. What Nikon "macro" lens would you recommend for me? Thanks!
Thanks for the kind words. I'm not really familiar with Nikon macro lenses enough to recommend one - what I can suggest is that with a 35mm lens you'll be working very closely with the subject, 50 is usually manageable for objects, but you'll need longer for small bugs, etc that you don't or can't get too close to.
@@MaartenHeilbron Thanks for the reply. I already have a Nikon AF-S DX Micro NIKKOR 85mm F3.5G ED VR lens. I spoke to a gentleman on a recent vacation who has a Nikon AF-S VR Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/2.8G IF-ED. He told me that he should have kept the Nikon Micro-NIKKOR 105mm f/2.8 lens which he sold. I need to learn more about the lenses that I already have. Thanks again!
nice video, I have a nikon d3400 the lens that it has its a regular one the zoom is not the best. Im looking into buying a lense that has a better zoom but that wont be too expensive, any suggestions?
Thank you for the very informative video which I just now came across. Would a NIkon d 5500 or 5600 be suitable for food blog photography? If so, can you recommend the appropriate lens. Thanks again Barry
Every camera is appropriate for food photography. In general you need a fairly wide angle (less than 35mm equivalent), with a large aperture (F2 or larger). And even then in some dark restaurants you may want an unobtrusive flash.
8:19 this is mindblow for me, i never stumble across this information, thank you for metionig that, now i just need to get 16-80mm, because i already have d5500 :D
What would be the best Nikon VR lens for video? I have the 5500 and the 10-24, which, however, does not have VR. I suspect that VR is important, in particular for videos. Thank you for your reply.
I would not consider VR a must have for video - however that lens may be too wide for general use. Good for real estate and wide shots though. In general, VR does not provide enough or suitable stabilization for video. A tripod, or a gimbal, does.
1.What's the difference between 50mm and 85 mm prime lenses? is the extra payment is worth enough? 2. For macro, is the extension ring will serve the purpose ?
1) The 85mm will get you closer - meaning the camera doesn't have to be so close to the subject, it's usually used for portraits in studio settings. You're probably not paying for the focal length, but for the quality of materials and construction - or the maximum aperture. For portraits the larger the aperture (i.e., the smaller the F number) the better.
sir ... i have nikon d5200 and my firmware is up to date ie 1.03. ..at present i want to purchase a lens ....whether i go for new nikon AS-P 70-300 or Tamron di ld 70-300....my main use is photograph not vedio ...aperture value is not good in AS-P lens then tamron so i am verymuch confused between dis 2 lens ...kindly say which lens is good for photography with good blur background
If you are taking portraits of people (or objects) a prime lens with a large aperture (that means F2 or an even smaller F number) will provide the nicest blurred backgrounds. I've only used the Nikon lens, but I would not see a large difference between these two. Although you can get a decent blur (use these six steps - th-cam.com/video/FgpHdMxv2rg/w-d-xo.html) I would not recommend these for that purpose.
Christopher Frost - th-cam.com/users/christopherfrost - has done great reviews on many of the Tamron and Sigma lenses on Canon cameras. They're not direct comparisons with Nikon lenses, but his videos give you a good idea of what you can expect. Plus, they're easier to understand than test chart numbers on DXO Mark when you're just starting out.
Thanks, I appreciate the kind words and the subscription. It won't damage the lens - but if you point the lens directly at the sun (or another very bright object) it may - although mostly in liveview mode. When camera stores recommend UV filters, they're suggesting two things - one that the UV filter sits in front of the lens, making it less likely to get damaged, but also to reduce some haze that might be visible in some situations. If you're careful, it's not really necessary. I talked and demonstrated that here: th-cam.com/video/6n4zvDwcWt0/w-d-xo.html
The 16-80mm lens is a very expensive upgrade to buy on its own, not quite so expensive when bought as a "kit" with some of the higher-end bodies. I've been using Nikon digital for about 14 years and my first upgrade to the lit lens was the older, slower 16-85VR which can now be bought used for not much money compared to the 16-80. I also have a used Sigma 17-70 f/2.8-4 which I think is a much under-rated lens. As good as the newer Nikon 16-80 but with slightly less zoom range, and I am impressed with the sharpness of my copy for under a third of the price of the Nikon.
Maarten, I am considering the Nikon AF-S DX Micro NIKKOR 85mm f/3.5G ED Vibration Reduction Fixed Zoom Lens with Auto Focus for my Macro lens (I know Nikon calls them Micro) ... this would be my third lens ... I have the kit 18-55, and the 70-300 VR lens ... are there other Macro lenses I should consider ... ? Thank you
I need a suggestion to buy a medium zoom fast focussing lens.. i am confused with sigma 17-50 f2.8 or tamron 24-70 f2.8 old version.. please put your suggestions
Thanks for the request. For details about a specific lens, you're better to check a site that does more rigorous testing than I can do, like dxomark, dpreview and others.
Not really, only you know what's best for you - which suits your wallet, which fits your hand, which meets your photo needs and plans. From where I stand, both are suitable for a wide variety of photography.
hello good night I would like to ask u a question. I have a nikon d3200 and Im not sure on buying a new lens or a new body full frame ( as you know nikon d3200 is crop sensor).Thank you and have an amazing day
Unless there is a specific feature that another body has that you need for your photographs, I would invest in a lens, and since the full frame lenses are superior, and you think you might upgrade to full frame in the future, make it a full frame lens.
thank you very much...I have nikkor 50 mm F/1.8 and I would like a lens very sharp and for landscape ....do you think 18-105 mm would work for what I want?
I suppose, but for higher quality I'd recommend an FX lens. If you're doing landscapes, a wider angle prime might be more suitable - I assume your dissatisfaction with the 50mm is that you can't capture the whole scene?
Hello, Iv had a question a little unrelated to the video. I am cofused in choosing my first camera. Between Nikon D5600 or Fujifilms XT 100. My main focus is landscape and night scape and Iv been using smart phone so far. As someone who has used both the cameras what's your opinion. I don't mind the weight or size of camera.
Either would be fine, with the right lens. For landscapes you generally want a wider angle. Let your wallet, your hand (how it fits) and your sense of style or brand preference guide you.
I just started out and have a d5600 (dx lens), are you telling if I buy a full frame sensor dslr of Nikon in future i need to re-buy every lenses for Fx and my current lenses are of no use?
I am still in confusion with choosing lenses . The main problem i face is in low light i don't want to use the flashlight. I did not get enough shutter speed even on increasing the noise. What should i do in order to get best night photographs. also i am unable to get closeups of insects and small objects. i have 70-200mm Af-S lens. Please help me out.
It sounds as if you may need a faster lens. If your shutter speed is already down to 1/60 (probably the slowest you can handhold) and your ISO is already at 6400 (probably the most noise most of us will tolerate), there are not many options other than increasing the light, either with a flash or other source. For closeups of small objects, a macro lens is recommended.
Oh...one other thing. I did buy a d5500 and returned it because when I updated the firmware the auto focus on my Sigma 18-200 quit working, which was a pity because I liked the camera. So you know of any fix, if so, I will buy the camera again. Thank you Barry
You need to get the firmware in your Sigma lens updated. I recently went from an old D40 to D3300 and I had to send 2 of my older Sigma lenses to Sigma UK for updating to work with the D3300 and newer Nikon bodies. There was a small charge basically to cover postage., and they turned them round within 2 days... I was without them for less than a week
What is the default lens for the Nikon D7500? Is it the 18-140mm VR Lens? I ordered the camera from Amazon but just got it and there's no lens, just the body. I'm looking to do videos and photos, I just want the default lens.
There's really no such lens, but what most people consider the standard focal range is something with a range from about 16-80mm. Nikon and third parties offer several options, I suggest you buy the best you can afford. There is a Nikon "kit" lens (the one you sometimes see bundled) but it's really a lower quality than this camera provides.
please help me out, as a beginner i'm planning to buy nikon d3400 and after watching your video i think i would go for 70-300mm lens and 50 mm lens as a prime lens , so i need to ask you is it good to go for 70-300 as a kit lens rather then 18-55mm lens.
I'd probably forgo all of those inexpensive lenses and get something better, like the DX16-80mm. A lens can and should last a lot longer than the camera - buy a good one. Unless you have a very specific purpose in mind, a nice general lens like this is an excellent starting point.
Maarten Heilbron i would love to but it is priced around 1200$ in india , so as a beginer i was looking for a cheaper one, and in future i would go for the pricey one . :)
Maarten Heilbron hy ! I also have a d3400 and really into the 70 300 , my main usage would be some wildlife such as birds , sports, cars , but at the same time i want to take pictures of people in the city, some portraits were i work . What do you recommend i cant spend more than 250$
There are so few lenses of any quality under $250, that you're asking for the impossible. You should be able to take portraits at the 70mm end of the 70-300.
How much are you prepared to spend? Do you have a DX or FX body? Where is the hummingbird? Generally, a longer lens (200mm plus) and a faster lens (F4 or less) is recommended. However, if you've created a hummingbird specific area in your yard with good lighting and can position the camera closer - you may be able to do with less.
I'd go with Nikon, Sigma or Tamron - but there are others. In a 35 or 50mm prime lens, a aperture larger than F2. is not hard to find. I don't have enough experience to recommend one, but there are several sites that do detailed lens reviews.
Hello sir, just want to ask if you already tried using 70-300 af compared to the 70-300 that you have used in the video. I am planning to buy zoom lens but i dont know what should i choose
hi thanks for your answer. Just want to ask you one more question. I do have Nikon d5300 as I mentioned you before, I do videography most of the time. so which lens is good for that ? I mean I do have 18-55mm VR, 18-200mm, one prime lens 50mm as well. 50 mm does great shoot but it is 50mm. I want to know which lens is best that covers landscape in HD mode.?
I just want to know: If I use extension tube or teleconverter on my Nikon d5600 to use nikkor 50 mm 1.8d lens , will it autofocus ? I know that d lenses doesn't has autofocus motor and neither does d5600...please answer..
so i'm looking for a dslr (from nikon) and i can choose between the 3400,3500, 5300 and 5600 i dont know wich one too pic, also dont know what lensen i need.i want to use it for landscapes but also for fishing (like 2 meter distance taking a foto of a person). could you help me? or any body in chat :)?
I'm sure that they would all be fine choices. Take the best quality Nikon lens you can afford - the 16-80 would be suitable for both of those (and more).
Sir, which prime lens would you recommend for nikon D5300, 35mm f1.8 or 50mm f1.8? bcz as for DX sensor 1.5 crop 50 actually focuses on 75 which looks a pretty zoomed in.
I'm recommending this video to anyone who's getting into photography. Best video.
That's very kind of you to say, thanks for your kind words.
I stumbled across your video while browsing youtube for tips on vintage nikkor lenses. Certainly wasn't expecting a fantastic class in beginner lens basics. Although I knew almost all the concepts you discussed, it is all a lot clearer now.
And what a relief it is to listen to you talk about photography without irrelevant ranting like a few famous others.
Subscribed and looking forward to a lot more knowledge from you.
A pleasure to read your kind words - thanks very much for taking the time to comment.
Just ran into this video. When you started talking I suddenly sat up straight. You reminded me of my professor. You explain things very clearly and simply. Highly recommended for new photographers.
That's very kind, thanks for taking the time to comment.
Wow, I just bought a Nikon D3500 as a starter camera and searched for some videos about the lenses and this by far was the most informative and helpful. Thanks!
I'm so glad to read your positive reaction, always nice to know my videos are helpful. Thanks!
Thank you so much for the clear overview Maarten, I knew most of it, but you have the gift of being a good teacher, keeping things simple, add the right images to the story, and also being somewhat understated entertaining. That's refreshing these days. Thumbs up!
What a pleasure to read your kind words, particularly "understated entertaining". I'm very appreciative, thanks.
I dont use Nikon.
But I still watch this. Becos your videos are good.
You defintely deserve more subscriber.
That's very kind of you to say, thanks for watching and commenting. Please feel free to suggest topics you'd like to see me talk about.
I bought the older Nikon 16-85 at the time for my d5100. I now use it on my d7200. I would recommend it to any Dx shooters.
I presume the newer 16-80 is just as good. I've a number of primes which I never use ( the zooms have the flexibility, these don't).
I will admit the quality of the images is superior. Cheers E
Thanks for sharing your observations.
Seriously, this is the most informative video I found on TH-cam about different types of lens. Thank you so much sir!
I'm honouring by your kind and generous words, thank you very much.
This might be one of the best videos on the basics of lenses I've ever seen, and I wasn't even looking for it. Decided to get into photography after being inspired by a few automotive photographers and I'm trying to decide on which lens to get next. This has been super helpful, thank you.
Always nice to know that my videos are useful and appreciated, thanks for the kind words.
Most of the gear you look at or review, I will probably never use, yet I watch every single one of your vids. Thank you for the quality vids and I look forward to more in the future!
What a pleasant comment - thank you for your kind words, appreciated.
I'm a complete Novice, just about to buy my first Nikon DSLR, I found this video really helpful, so thanks
It's always a pleasure to know that my videos are useful, thank you.
Great video! My favorite lens for the d5500/d5600 is the Nikon DX 35mm f/1.8 G. The field of view is perfect for street photography (about 52mm), and it's a great little lens for under $200. I like the 50mm, but it shrank the field of view to a point that was just to narrow for my taste, so I only use it on my FX nowadays.
Thanks, always a pleasure to read positive feedback. And thanks for sharing your insights - always nice to hear an experienced viewpoint.
been through many videos for lens but i would say you are the best. no one explains in detail and with ease other then you.
that's very kind of you to say, thanks for commenting.
This is one of the most informative and clear videos I have ever seen on youtube! I have a feeling I will be learning a lot from you. Thank you!
What a pleasure to read your kind words, thanks for taking the time to comment.
Simple and excellent explanation. Thank you Maarten! Guys, If you just bought or are about to buy your first Nikon DSLR. This video is a must watch.
I appreciate the kind words, thanks for taking the time to comment.
i have D5500.. because of this video i know what lenses i want.. its Nikkor 16-80. nice video and thank you.
I appreciate the kind words - but do check out wirecutter.com for their recommendations.
Black Baron I bought the 16-80 for my d5500. Best money spent for me. It replaced soo many primes i had. How did you go?
@@sarajordie how's the performance of nikkor 16-80mm f/2.8 lens you have? I ask you this question because I have plan to by also same this nikkor lens 16-80mm f/2.8-4E. Thanks in advance
@@jasper232 That's a lens I really love.
@@MaartenHeilbron How about this lens, Sigma 17-70mm F2.8-4 DC Macro OS HSM Lens? what do you think?
Truly splendid overview Maarten, as usual. I particularly appreciate your excellent explanations in conjunction with your examples.
That's very kind of you, thanks for commenting.
THANK YOU! this was very helpful. I just bought a D3300 and I know very little about DSLR cameras. I am mainly interested in Video shooting and your video had a lot of useful information! I learned a lot!
Thanks nice to hear, thanks for taking the time to comment, always good to know my content is useful.
Clear and to the point, not dragged out. Great video Maarten. Subbed
Thanks for the sub! Appreciated
Wow! Just like watching BBC about lenses. Thank you sir. Just what I need. Subbed
Thanks, I appreciate the kind words, and the subscription.
Maarten Heilbron You deserve more subs sir.
That's very kind of you to say, thanks - but I have exactly the right number of subscribers. And I continue to rely on a natural and organic growth based on posting videos that are detailed and honest.
I think the 18-55 aperture can be changed in live view but you need to turn off manual movie settings first.
I know that's not correct.
Maarten, Very clear, crisp explanation. Thank you.
May I request your video on, "How would the photo quality differs in the cases of Basic(or semi-pro) DSLR with great lens and prof-DSLR with cheaper lenses?"
Thanks, I appreciate your kind words - and your good suggestion. I'd rather have an entry level DSLR with a top of the line lens than the other way around. The way I see it, many good cameras are spoiled by cheap kit lenses.
Thank you so much.
Very educative and helpful for a beginner photographer like me, really appreciate all of your videos!
Thanks for the kind words, appreciated.
@@neilpiper9889 While I agree with your approach, and keeping the filters to a common diameter is good if you can do it, I don't imagine that anyone enjoys being called stupid.
Great video - thank you! I recently bought a Nikon 16-80 2.8-4 and truly love it. I've had a couple lenses that were more expensive in the 'close to same' zoom range and in my very humble opinion like this lens better. I really like the crispness of the images taken with this lens. Thanks again for the vid.
Always my pleasure, thank you for your kind words.
You sir are the best teacher in explaining lenses & photography.. kudos.. I learnt a lot from watching your videos..!
Always nice to know that viewers appreicate my videos, thanks for commenting.
Hi Marteen, I am confused between the Nikon D610 and the Nikon D750.
The D610 is available with a 50mm f/1.8 and battery pack WiFi adapter for 900 USD while the D750 body only is available for 1200 USD.
Which camera is a better buy?
That depends. As the image quality is similar, unless you know that there are one or more features on the D750 that you will use, you should choose with your wallet and your hand (which fits better).
Hi Maarten. Very informative and useful. I have the D5500 . It came with the kit lenses 18 - 55mm and 55 - 300mm kits lenses. I agree with what you say. I have added the 50mm 1.8. Excellent lens for the money. Great for portraits and in low light. I would like to add the 10 - 24mm. As for the camera, live view and the touch screen, with the ability to see the camera settings more clearly than a small window on top of the camera is a real bonus for someone who needs reading glasses.
Regards. - Ron (Scotland)
Thanks for sharing your thoughts and your kind words. I haven't used the 10-24mm - let me know how you like it.
You can also have a 35mm DX 1.8G which have a wider angle and can be used as an everyday lens. And there is the new AF-P 10-20 VR an affordable wide angle lens!
Thanks for adding your thoughts.
Can 50mm nikkor lens be used to shoot indoor low light shots and if so then how is the result and can it be used with nikon D3400 and how is the portrait shots if i use with nikon D3400.
Odgledala sam dosta toga, ali vasa objasnjenja su sazeta, razumljiva i vrlo interesantna. Hvala na iscrpnim informacijama!
Pravo je zadovoljstvo čitati lijepe riječi od gledatelja koji cijeni moj stil i pristup, hvala što ste odvojili vrijeme za komentar.
I learned alot on this 1 video about lenses, first i was so confused what lens should i buy for my d3400, i was confused by DX and VX and now all the questions on my mind about lenses are done.
Excellent - that's exactly the outcome I was hoping for when I made this video. Thanks for the kind words.
Thanks for the video, just bought a D5600 to replace my stalwart D40. With that ive never used anything other than the stock lens so very interesting to have a clear explanation on the differences before I buy.
I appreciate the kind words, always nice to know I've provided useful content.
Great information. Excellent tutorial, particularly for beginners! Good job.
That's very kind of you to say, thanks for commenting.
Thank you for the clean and clear explanation sir. You've got good pitch of patience.
A pleasure to read your kind words, thanks!
Every time I watched your videos I learned a new trick in photography. THANK TOU..
That's a very nice comment to read, thanks.
i think you should make a video explaining how a beginner photographer such as myself would read, use and understand lens charts such as dxomark and the like... great work on these vids very usefuk in terms of understanding and practice. thanks
Thank you for your very kind words, and your confidence, much appreciated. That is an excellent suggestion. However, I too am not clear on how to interpret those charts, I only understand that higher numbers are better (I think?). I will give this suggestion some further thought though.
I wish i watched this before i even bought my first dslr.. now i have lenses that i rarely use because over time my preferences changed.. thanks for this very informative video
My pleasure, thanks for your kind words.
You deserve more viewers. Love your channel!!
Thanks for the kind wishes, and the kind words. There will be more viewers.
Great video! I bought a Nikon D3400 about 2 years ago. I have only bought a 50mm lens but I'm always thinking about what lens I would buy next.
Thanks, always nice to know my videos are helpful.
Very well done video on the basic lenses. Great Job!
Thanks so much! Always nice to know my work is appreciated.
Great video! I enjoyed the information you provided! Thank you.
That's very kind of you to say, thanks!
Awesome video to learn about lenses. I am just entering the photography world. Can you make a video on the adapters that can be used on nikon bodies for canon and sony lenses, if possible?
I can summarize that video in a couple of sentences. Nikon and others make many excellent lenses for the Nikon F mount. No adapter made can match the ease of use offered by a native lens. Does that cover it?
Thank you very much for the clarification and guidance! 👍
always my pleasure.
Hi Maarten, really enjoying your helpful videos.
I have seen cars being photographed looking down on the bonnet {hood} and the engine is visible while the bonnet is down, I am wondering if you have a video regarding this on how to actually do this.
I don't, but when you try it, which part of the image isn't working?
Thank you very much for your explanatory video! The comparison was very clear, and even though I couldn't totally understand the numbers in the begin of the video, I got the gist of the it! I am changing my D3200 by either a D5600 or a Canon 750D. As I already have a 50-200mm, and I love to shot portraits on 200mm, that has weighted in favor of the getting the D5600, so I can keep the lenses. If possible, I would like to know your opinion about what do you think make a better set for everyday photography and portraits: the Canon 750D + 18-55mm + 50mm (prime lens f/1.8) or the Nikon D5600 + 18-55 + 50-200mm. Thanks!
Neither of those kit lenses are worth owning. What is behind your decision to upgrade to a new camera? Would you be equally happy just purchasing a better lens - for example, a nice 85mm prime will do more to improve your portrait quality than a new camera.
The D3200 got dust and few grains of sand inside while I shooting photos close to a helicopter in Italy. Fortunately the camera was insured, and I took the camera to a Nikon authorized assistance point to remove the dust/sand without worrying about cost. However, they decided to reimburse the equivalent of the price of the camera rather than fix it. I am not particularly worried about getting a weather sealed camera this time, because the circumstances where the camera got damaged were rather unusual and I don't think I will be using the new camera on a situation where weather sealing will play a major role. Another option I thought considering was a 77D. I could get it by about the same price of the 750D, but would come with no lens - only the body. In that case I would get a second hand 18-55mm STM lens to use the camera initially. The 750D, on the other hand, would come with a 18-55mm and a 50mm f/1.8.
I’m sorry for your loss - but glad to hear it’s working in your favour. I’d stay with Nikon and the lens, changing menu systems can be tiring.
Hi Maarten, thanks for your suggestion!
always my pleasure
Newer 18-55mm lenses have a 55mm filter diameter and no manual switches for A/M and VR selectors. As for the AF-P, any 2016+ Nikon will be compatible with them OOtB. Cameras from 2015 such as the d3300, d5300, and d7200 will need a firmware upgrade to be fully compatible. Keep in mind that the d7200 will NOT have a firmware-based VR switch, so VR will be always on in the d7200.
I have a d7200 and my lenses are:
Prime: AF-P DX 35mm f1.8G
General Purpose: AF-S DX 18-105mm f3.5 (this one is quite heavy)
Telephoto: AF-P DX 70-300mm f4.5
Thanks for adding these notes.
Prime is AFS 35mm not AF-P.
Thank you sir for this video.
For wildlife photography if I use Nikon D5600 with 70-300 AF-P FX Lens Or if I use 18-300 FX AF-P Lens what will be better . Inspite of these I expect your suggestions .
They would be about the same, but you would have a wider range with the 18-300.
Actually I had read a blog which said:
The new lens is made in Nikon’s factory in Thailand and its build quality is much as you’d expect for a mid-range lens. Size-wise it’s a good match for the D7100 body that was supplied with the lens for this review but would probably be a bit ungainly on smaller D5500 or D3300 bodies.
Glad to see your question has been answered.
Ps: the Nikon 70-300 VR fx lens is also quite good
I appreciate the note, thanks.
I love this lens, probably my favorite and most used once I got used to it.
@@TeKnoVKNG23 Glad to hear it suits your needs.
That's a very good video!
I would also recommend (for Nikon APSC beginners) the 35mm F1.8 which is VERY cheap but very good and also lightweight.
In addition to that a used Nikon 10-24 or Tokina 11-20mm. If the 16-80 is too expensive, you can also go with a Sigma 17-70.
One of the best ASPC lenses on the market is the Sigma 18-35mm, but it is also expensive and heavy. The old Nikon 17-55 is also very good (and cheap when you buy it used) but weights a lot. For travelling the cheap 18-200 Tamron is good if you are price sensitive.
Always think about what you want to do with your camera and if weight is important (travelling, hiking, ...).
--> And you can save a lot money when you buy used lenses!
Thanks for sharing! I appreciate you sharing your knowledge and experience.
Amazing video sir! Perfect description and difference between between lens.
I'm so glad to hear your found it helpful, thanks for the kind words.
Your videos are most informative. What do you think of the Nikkor 18mm-300mm? It's appealing because I'd carry only one lens instead of the 18mm-55mm and the 55mm-300mm.
Thanks, I appreciate the kind words. It's not their best lens, but it is an inexpensive way to get to 300mm.
Great stuff here! I learned a lot re the Fx lenses. Did not know they could be used w/ the Dx cams. Thanks.
Always good to know that I've provided useful information. Yes, that's true of Nikon. Canon's crop lenses can't be used on full frame bodies.
As I am completely new to photography I really loved this video, Helped me understand what I need to fully enjoy photography, thankyou Sir.
A pleasure to read your kind words, thank you!
Thank you so much for the impressive clip !
I have Nikon D5300 and would like to upgrade my outdated kit lens , but still puzzled between Nikon 18-300 or Tamron 18-400. I'm mainly interested in taking nature photos. Which one do you recommend sir :) ?
I wish I'd had the opportunity to compare those two - hopefully you'll find the information you are looking for elsewhere on the web.
Very informative. Thanks for the video.
A quick question: With my current budget, I can either go with D7200 with 18-140mm OR go buy an inferior body like D5300 with 18-140mm and spend the deference on a basic prime lens like 50mm f/1.8 (or 35mm f/1.8 maybe?). Which way would you go for?
Thanks, I appreciate the kind words. I'd take the less expensive body and the better lens. A less expensive model still has a good sensor (and better than the kit lens can take advantage of) just fewer features.
@@MaartenHeilbron Thanks for the prompt response.
@@bijanemortazavi always happy to help.
The 35mm is a 50mm on full frame too? The problem I have is dealing with 2x crop factor - even with a speedbooster its only a a 1.42x crop factor and I'm at the point where I'm messing around with adapting an E-mount focal reducer to work with a m43 speedbooster for an effective 1.01x where even if it doesnt work out it'll work on the b-roll camera I'm getting. Could you make a suggestion on which you would pick between a Sony NEX 5N/5R 7 and a Sony a3000 - I'm leaning towards the 5N/5R which cost $150/180 respectively with their 25k iso but the 7 is $240 and gets an extra 8mp at 24mp and the a3000 puts me at 20mp for around $200. I do feel that a3000 is a little leaned out and bulky, and I don't know how well the cheaper plastic feel will settle with me. I think maybe there isn't enough of a difference between the second and third generation 5 to warrant the extra $30 so do I want to pay an extra $100 for an electronic viewfinder and +8mp? Or am I missing something about NEX 7?
Mind you I'm using it mostly for film and don't want to usurp my gx85 with 4k and Dual IBIS... And sure I could get a used a6000 but I want something in "excellent" condition, not "well used."
Nearly all manufacturers specify the focal length based on full frame. On a full frame camera, 35mm is 35mm. And after that I'm confused, as your comments don't seem to relate to this video.
Certainly.
I do know that -- although I do kind of wish lenses were all called by their 35mm equivalent so I didn't have to remember format in order to do an equation in my head for everything - m43 is easy enough with it just being double but having to do this in my head until I memorize it is a pain: (F÷2)3
And I use a series of c-mount lenses too and don't even bother - I just know that my 4.8mm 2/3" lenses are ultra wide and fast and my 8-48mm f1.0 is even faster, parfocal, gives me the widest zoom range of any lens I have, and it's very very sharp.
So further off the rails and back to tying this back in - I guess I misheard what you were saying about the full frame 35mm on full frame, and your part about crop sensors and effective/actual focal lengths is what got me started writing, where I was watching this while researching 35mm lenses. I'm comparing them to 28mm lenses and trying to figure out if I should go out of my way to get some of my 50mm lenses counterparts in 35mm over 28mm - for instance a Nikkor 28mm f3.5 can be had on the cheap - the 35mm not so much and its the same for just about every fast 50mm prime I have minus my Zeiss Pancolar f1.8 & f2(these are far more expensive in general it seems and so I look at Russian clones instead) and Vivitar(which is pretty reasonable all the way around).
So with dealing with focal lengths and crop factors, different sensor sizes and lens adapters I started thinking I'm working really hard on trying to achieve something that is much easier when you have an APS-C sensor, and trying to figure out how to fill focal length holes in my lens collection would stop being such a chore and fiscally unreasonable: buy a Sony NEX camera and a focal reducer for it, then take the number of lenses I have, multiply them by 1.5 and now thats the amount of focal lengths I have at my disposal.
So a 35mm lens is a very different lens to an SLR user, a DSLR user and a m43 user, focal reducers double what the crop sensors are capable of capturing and I like having options. So ya this no longer really pertains to this video aside from you briefly talking DX and FX differences and you having reviewed some(if not all) of the cameras I have in question.
I agree it can be confusing, and I appreciate your aggravation, but it sounds like you have a good understanding.
Hi.. I have d5100 and I use it for family photographs indoor and outdoor. I am looking for a budget but fair quality zoom lens with a zoom range at least upto 300mm. In future it is possible that I may upgrade to full frame body (in 5-7 years). So I am confused between AF-S DX Nikkor 55-300mm F/4.5-5.6G ED VR & 70-300 mm f/4.5-5.6 G AF-S VR IF-ED. Moreover there is AF-P NIKKOR 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6E ED VR f/34-8 which is not compatible with my present body but better than 70-300 mm f/4.5-5.6 G AF-S VR IF-ED. Please guide me.
Thanks
If you are planning to go to full frame, you'll need an FX (not DX) lens. I haven't used it, but this looks like a good choice. bhpho.to/2C66cBb. However, it does not have a very wide aperture and ramps when zooming. If you can be satisfied with 200mm, you will find lenses with wider apertures that don't ramp.
5:41 comparing those image, i don’t understand with same f n iso; why the 2nd one sharper than the 1st one?
Because it is a better quality lens.
N still dont understand i am :)
@@egogreen2045 The two shots were taken with two different lenses, with the same settings. What this example shows is that one lens is of higher quality than the other.
@@MaartenHeilbron ok, Tq. mr.Marteen
Hi man, nice video. You know if the Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-85 mm 1:3,5-4,5G ED VR can change f number in video on the D5500?? Thank you
Thanks, I appreciate the kind words. There are some Nikon body/lens combinations that can't adjust the aperture in live view mode. I thought, when I reviewed the D5500 that the difference was an "E" in the lens model name th-cam.com/video/esc0PNAh9-k/w-d-xo.html.
However, the lack of E (as I learned in later reviews) did not mean that it would not work. I think that this lens will likely not support aperture adjustment in live view - but you'd have to check to be certain.
Thanks man, I appreciate it. I thought because it had a ED it my work. I think I'll buy a Sigma 17-50 mm F2,8 EX DC OS HSM, I have a 24-70mm2.8 which I love but does not have AF motor, and the D5500 has no focus pecking tools for M focus, you think that the Sony A7 III focus pecking works with an old Nikon lens like that with adapter of course?? Thank you very much.
I'm always happy to help. "ED" (a glass coating) and "E" are not the same. Focus peaking is generally a function of the sensor/processor and is lens independent - so yes, that combination will work. Peaking can be useful for manual focus, but I do prefer an expanded view, which is available on the D5500.
Thanks for your video. Having a D3400 , and a prime 50mm as well as 18-55mm , what other lens you would suggest me to get? I was thinking about the new 18-300mm but it seems it's more day to day photography rather than a bit more pro. Also, I am thinking to do photography more professional and will this might make me to change my camera and buying new lenses would be pointless? also, if i wanna do more modelling apart 50mm for having a big angel and good shot what lens would be better? I'd appreciate your advice.
I know I got a lot of questions! :)
Always a pleasure to read kind words from my viewers - and to answer their questions. It's hard to suggest a lens without knowing what you're trying to accomplish. For landscape/architecture, maybe a wider lens; for wildlife and birds, maybe a longer zoom; for closeup work a macro lens is very useful ...
@@MaartenHeilbron Thanks for your reply. I just had a look at macro lenses and it's really difficult to choose among all the lenses. I am kinda lost now :/ :)
Always happy to help. With macro lenses, the smallest focal length (like under 50) will require you to work very close to the subject. The longer lengths (over 80) you are too far to reach the object at arm's length (but that's what you want for insects on flowers, etc. Hope this helps.
great video... im using a D5000 came with 18˜55 VR I and 70˜300 manual, and im searching for a new lens to job..
I hope you find what you're looking for. Maybe this helps - thewirecutter.com/reviews/the-first-nikon-lenses-you-should-buy/
Hello Maarten,
great review.
I only did not understand one thing
and that is would 50mm f1.8 FX be too much croped on the nikon d3400 DX ?
Thank you so much for knowledge and skills which you give us for free!
Thanks for your kind words, they are appreciated. On a DX body, the 50mm lens would give you the same field of view as a 75mm (approximately) lens on an FX body. Is that too much?
Well, as a beginner I really think that I do not have correct vision of how it goes to look like..
but something what I really like on 50mm except bokeh is that I can be far from subject (when I shoot portrait)and for other things I have 18-55mm and it's really great lens,
but I am still thinkig above 50FX and 35DX on my dx camera....
@@lilyjo7479 Go to your local camera store and try them out to see which is best for your needs.
Very helpful video, I have a D5200. I learned a lot from this video. Thank you for making it!
Glad it was helpful! Thanks for the kind words.
Great channel with great videos and good explanation! As a beginner, this helps me a lot in making a decision for my 2nd Nikon DX Lens. THANK YOU SIR! :)
It was a pleasure to read your kind words. Do check out wirecutter's Nikon lens suggestions too.
I enjoyed this video. I had a Nikon D7000 using a Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR II as the "kit" lens and a Nikon AF-S VR Zoom-Nikkor 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G IF-ED as a "wildlife" lens. I recently bought a Nikon D500 with the AF-S DX NIKKOR 16-80mm f/2.8-4E ED VR "kit" lens. I have ordered a Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 50mm f/1.8G "prime" lens. What Nikon "macro" lens would you recommend for me? Thanks!
Thanks for the kind words. I'm not really familiar with Nikon macro lenses enough to recommend one - what I can suggest is that with a 35mm lens you'll be working very closely with the subject, 50 is usually manageable for objects, but you'll need longer for small bugs, etc that you don't or can't get too close to.
@@MaartenHeilbron Thanks for the reply. I already have a Nikon AF-S DX Micro NIKKOR 85mm F3.5G ED VR lens. I spoke to a gentleman on a recent vacation who has a Nikon AF-S VR Micro-Nikkor
105mm f/2.8G IF-ED. He told me that he should have kept the Nikon Micro-NIKKOR 105mm f/2.8 lens which he sold. I need to learn more about the lenses that I already have. Thanks again!
Always happy to help.
nice video, I have a nikon d3400 the lens that it has its a regular one the zoom is not the best. Im looking into buying a lense that has a better zoom but that wont be too expensive, any suggestions?
I like wire cutter's Nikon lens recommendations: thewirecutter.com/reviews/the-first-nikon-lenses-you-should-buy/
Thank you for the very informative video which I just now came across.
Would a NIkon d 5500 or 5600 be suitable for food blog photography?
If so, can you recommend the appropriate lens.
Thanks again
Barry
Every camera is appropriate for food photography. In general you need a fairly wide angle (less than 35mm equivalent), with a large aperture (F2 or larger). And even then in some dark restaurants you may want an unobtrusive flash.
Thank you for this great video !!! Much love from Compton California
So nice to hear from Compton! I appreciate the kind words, thanks.
Thank you!
8:19 this is mindblow for me, i never stumble across this information, thank you for metionig that, now i just need to get 16-80mm, because i already have d5500 :D
So glad to hear you found my video useful. thanks.
What would be the best Nikon VR lens for video? I have the 5500 and the 10-24, which, however, does not have VR. I suspect that VR is important, in particular for videos. Thank you for your reply.
I would not consider VR a must have for video - however that lens may be too wide for general use. Good for real estate and wide shots though. In general, VR does not provide enough or suitable stabilization for video. A tripod, or a gimbal, does.
1.What's the difference between 50mm and 85 mm prime lenses? is the extra payment is worth enough?
2. For macro, is the extension ring will serve the purpose ?
1) The 85mm will get you closer - meaning the camera doesn't have to be so close to the subject, it's usually used for portraits in studio settings. You're probably not paying for the focal length, but for the quality of materials and construction - or the maximum aperture. For portraits the larger the aperture (i.e., the smaller the F number) the better.
Yet another excellent video. Thanks!
Always nice to know that my videos are appreciated. Thanks.
sir ...
i have nikon d5200 and my firmware is up to date ie 1.03. ..at present i want to purchase a lens ....whether i go for new nikon AS-P 70-300 or Tamron di ld 70-300....my main use is photograph not vedio ...aperture value is not good in AS-P lens then tamron so i am verymuch confused between dis 2 lens ...kindly say which lens is good for photography with good blur background
If you are taking portraits of people (or objects) a prime lens with a large aperture (that means F2 or an even smaller F number) will provide the nicest blurred backgrounds. I've only used the Nikon lens, but I would not see a large difference between these two. Although you can get a decent blur (use these six steps - th-cam.com/video/FgpHdMxv2rg/w-d-xo.html) I would not recommend these for that purpose.
Hi! I was wondering what do you think of the 35mm f/1.8 Nikon lens and the Tamron equivalents for the 10-24 and 70-300. Thanks!
I really don't have enough experience with those lenses to provide an authoritative reply. Maybe Quora?
Thanks =D
Always my pleasure
Christopher Frost - th-cam.com/users/christopherfrost - has done great reviews on many of the Tamron and Sigma lenses on Canon cameras. They're not direct comparisons with Nikon lenses, but his videos give you a good idea of what you can expect. Plus, they're easier to understand than test chart numbers on DXO Mark when you're just starting out.
Very helpful, thanks for your reply.
Thankyoo i have d5300...looking to upgrade the lens
Good plan, thanks for your kind words.
Very informing as always
That's very kind of you to say, thanks for commenting.
First video of yours i have watched. Thank goodness your voice doesnt hurt my ears because you share useful info 😂🤗
Kind words indeed - thanks for watching.
Subscribed. Thank you for being so honest. Refreshing indeed!! One question 🙋 does sunlight damage the lens? Should a filter be used?
Thanks, I appreciate the kind words and the subscription. It won't damage the lens - but if you point the lens directly at the sun (or another very bright object) it may - although mostly in liveview mode. When camera stores recommend UV filters, they're suggesting two things - one that the UV filter sits in front of the lens, making it less likely to get damaged, but also to reduce some haze that might be visible in some situations. If you're careful, it's not really necessary. I talked and demonstrated that here: th-cam.com/video/6n4zvDwcWt0/w-d-xo.html
Maarten Heilbron thank you so very much for the reply ☺
@@GiftyEliyanaGraceActs Always happy to help.
The 16-80mm lens is a very expensive upgrade to buy on its own, not quite so expensive when bought as a "kit" with some of the higher-end bodies. I've been using Nikon digital for about 14 years and my first upgrade to the lit lens was the older, slower 16-85VR which can now be bought used for not much money compared to the 16-80. I also have a used Sigma 17-70 f/2.8-4 which I think is a much under-rated lens. As good as the newer Nikon 16-80 but with slightly less zoom range, and I am impressed with the sharpness of my copy for under a third of the price of the Nikon.
Thanks for adding your thoughts and observations.
Maarten, I am considering the Nikon AF-S DX Micro NIKKOR 85mm f/3.5G ED Vibration Reduction Fixed Zoom Lens with Auto Focus for my Macro lens (I know Nikon calls them Micro) ... this would be my third lens ... I have the kit 18-55, and the 70-300 VR lens ... are there other Macro lenses I should consider ... ? Thank you
I honestly don't know - Nikon has no macro lenses available for me to review.
I need a suggestion to buy a medium zoom fast focussing lens.. i am confused with sigma 17-50 f2.8 or tamron 24-70 f2.8 old version.. please put your suggestions
I have nikon d7000
Sorry, no experience with either of those lenses.
Nice.
Watch out for compatibility with sigma lenses. (Do extensive test before buying)
Thanks for that thought - but that would apply to older Nikon lenses as well - and the camera manual will detail some specific issues.
can you talk about af-s dx nikkor 18-140mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR
Thanks for the request. For details about a specific lens, you're better to check a site that does more rigorous testing than I can do, like dxomark, dpreview and others.
Thanks!🙇
And Can you tell me for start which camera is better for me? D5600 or D7200?
always my pleasure
Not really, only you know what's best for you - which suits your wallet, which fits your hand, which meets your photo needs and plans. From where I stand, both are suitable for a wide variety of photography.
hello good night I would like to ask u a question. I have a nikon d3200 and Im not sure on buying a new lens or a new body full frame ( as you know nikon d3200 is crop sensor).Thank you and have an amazing day
Unless there is a specific feature that another body has that you need for your photographs, I would invest in a lens, and since the full frame lenses are superior, and you think you might upgrade to full frame in the future, make it a full frame lens.
thank you very much...I have nikkor 50 mm F/1.8 and I would like a lens very sharp and for landscape ....do you think 18-105 mm would work for what I want?
I suppose, but for higher quality I'd recommend an FX lens. If you're doing landscapes, a wider angle prime might be more suitable - I assume your dissatisfaction with the 50mm is that you can't capture the whole scene?
you right Sir, which lens would you recommend for my nikon d3200 to shoot landscape???
Wirecutter recommends the Sigma 10-20mm. I haven't tried it, but it sounds like a sensible choice.
What an excellent review/tutorial... thank you
I appreciate your kind words, thank you.
Hello,
Iv had a question a little unrelated to the video. I am cofused in choosing my first camera. Between Nikon D5600 or Fujifilms XT 100. My main focus is landscape and night scape and Iv been using smart phone so far. As someone who has used both the cameras what's your opinion. I don't mind the weight or size of camera.
Either would be fine, with the right lens. For landscapes you generally want a wider angle. Let your wallet, your hand (how it fits) and your sense of style or brand preference guide you.
@@MaartenHeilbron great! Thanks mate.. 🙂👍
@@TheH0RIZ0N Always happy to help.
Buying a D5600 and wanted one good all-round lense, better than the kit lenses. Are you able to suggest any?
I'd get the 16-80, one of Nikon's nicest.
I just started out and have a d5600 (dx lens), are you telling if I buy a full frame sensor dslr of Nikon in future i need to re-buy every lenses for Fx and my current lenses are of no use?
It's not that they're not of any use - but they will not take full advantage of the FX sensor, as they only create a DX-sized image.
I am still in confusion with choosing lenses . The main problem i face is in low light i don't want to use the flashlight. I did not get enough shutter speed even on increasing the noise. What should i do in order to get best night photographs. also i am unable to get closeups of insects and small objects. i have 70-200mm Af-S lens. Please help me out.
It sounds as if you may need a faster lens. If your shutter speed is already down to 1/60 (probably the slowest you can handhold) and your ISO is already at 6400 (probably the most noise most of us will tolerate), there are not many options other than increasing the light, either with a flash or other source.
For closeups of small objects, a macro lens is recommended.
Oh...one other thing.
I did buy a d5500 and returned it because when I updated the firmware the auto focus on my Sigma 18-200 quit working, which was a pity because I liked the camera.
So you know of any fix, if so, I will buy the camera again.
Thank you
Barry
Sorry, I have no idea what might cause that. Did you check with the dealer? With Nikon? With Sigma?
Thank you for your response, I appreciate it. I have contacted Nikon and waiting for a reply.
Please keep us posted on the reply.
I will, thanks.
You need to get the firmware in your Sigma lens updated. I recently went from an old D40 to D3300 and I had to send 2 of my older Sigma lenses to Sigma UK for updating to work with the D3300 and newer Nikon bodies. There was a small charge basically to cover postage., and they turned them round within 2 days... I was without them for less than a week
What is the default lens for the Nikon D7500? Is it the 18-140mm VR Lens? I ordered the camera from Amazon but just got it and there's no lens, just the body.
I'm looking to do videos and photos, I just want the default lens.
There's really no such lens, but what most people consider the standard focal range is something with a range from about 16-80mm. Nikon and third parties offer several options, I suggest you buy the best you can afford. There is a Nikon "kit" lens (the one you sometimes see bundled) but it's really a lower quality than this camera provides.
please help me out, as a beginner i'm planning to buy nikon d3400 and after watching your video i think i would go for 70-300mm lens and 50 mm lens as a prime lens , so i need to ask you is it good to go for 70-300 as a kit lens rather then 18-55mm lens.
I'd probably forgo all of those inexpensive lenses and get something better, like the DX16-80mm. A lens can and should last a lot longer than the camera - buy a good one. Unless you have a very specific purpose in mind, a nice general lens like this is an excellent starting point.
Maarten Heilbron i would love to but it is priced around 1200$ in india , so as a beginer i was looking for a cheaper one, and in future i would go for the pricey one . :)
Understood.
Maarten Heilbron hy ! I also have a d3400 and really into the 70 300 , my main usage would be some wildlife such as birds , sports, cars , but at the same time i want to take pictures of people in the city, some portraits were i work . What do you recommend i cant spend more than 250$
There are so few lenses of any quality under $250, that you're asking for the impossible. You should be able to take portraits at the 70mm end of the 70-300.
which lenses do I need to take a clear photo of Hummingbird closer? thank you
How much are you prepared to spend? Do you have a DX or FX body? Where is the hummingbird? Generally, a longer lens (200mm plus) and a faster lens (F4 or less) is recommended. However, if you've created a hummingbird specific area in your yard with good lighting and can position the camera closer - you may be able to do with less.
Great video. Very helpful 👌
It’s always nice to know my videos are helpful.
Hello. I would want a large aperture lens. But i somehow shoot between 18 to not even 35mm in my kit lens. Which lens should i get? I have d3100
You should get the one that meets your needs - there are many manufacturers making lenses for Nikon mount.
Maarten Heilbron thanks a lot.
Maarten Heilbron which brand is a good lens that has f/1.8?
I'd go with Nikon, Sigma or Tamron - but there are others. In a 35 or 50mm prime lens, a aperture larger than F2. is not hard to find. I don't have enough experience to recommend one, but there are several sites that do detailed lens reviews.
thank you again
Hello sir, just want to ask if you already tried using 70-300 af compared to the 70-300 that you have used in the video. I am planning to buy zoom lens but i dont know what should i choose
I have not. That is a very long lens that will compromise quality and ramps to F5.6 as you zoom in.
Sir, what lense would you recommend for making video/vlogging on a nikon d5100?thank you so much!
A wide angle prime like the Nikon 24mmF2.8 - but there are also many third party lenses, I'm not aware of them all.
I want a lens for my nikon d7200. I want an all round performing lens. Please suggest
Currently my favourite Nikon all purpose lens is the 16-80.
hi, i have nikon D5300. Should I buy Nikon AF-S DX 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR Lens or 18-55 mm ? plz reply
I'd recommend the 16-80F2.8-4, which I've used quite a bit for various reviews and really enjoy.
hi thanks for your answer. Just want to ask you one more question. I do have Nikon d5300 as I mentioned you before, I do videography most of the time. so which lens is good for that ? I mean I do have 18-55mm VR, 18-200mm, one prime lens 50mm as well. 50 mm does great shoot but it is 50mm. I want to know which lens is best that covers landscape in HD mode.?
It doesn't take much to be good for landscape - but obviously a wider angle and higher quality will help you capture all the detail in a scene.
I just want to know: If I use extension tube or teleconverter on my Nikon d5600 to use nikkor 50 mm 1.8d lens , will it autofocus ?
I know that d lenses doesn't has autofocus motor and neither does d5600...please answer..
Sorry, I don't have the experience to answer.
so i'm looking for a dslr (from nikon) and i can choose between the 3400,3500, 5300 and 5600 i dont know wich one too pic, also dont know what lensen i need.i want to use it for landscapes but also for fishing (like 2 meter distance taking a foto of a person). could you help me? or any body in chat :)?
I'm sure that they would all be fine choices. Take the best quality Nikon lens you can afford - the 16-80 would be suitable for both of those (and more).
What do you recommend for portrait shots on the nikon d5600?
There are lots to choose from, but as it's APS-C, I'd take a wide open 50mm prime for portraits.
Sir, which prime lens would you recommend for nikon D5300, 35mm f1.8 or 50mm f1.8? bcz as for DX sensor 1.5 crop 50 actually focuses on 75 which looks a pretty zoomed in.
+Akash Baran Ghosh You will find a more detailed and technical analysis than I can do at dxomark.
Maarten Heilbron can you provide link sir?
dxomark.com