Ty for making a video with CS2 in it and actually using the D2 benchmap. I just wonder how you get so terribel FPS? I get above 1000 through the entire loop except for a few seconds on long before A site and when they blow the grenade in the B tunnels and spam their AK's then it drops to 750ish for a few seconds. My average / 1% lows after loop is always above 900 / 300. This is with a 14900K@6.1GHz, Patriot DDR5 8200, 4080 Super and I play on 1440x1080p, player models, ambient occlusion medium and HDR Quality and Fidelity disabled (Highest Quality)
I use a cheap z890 motherboard (MSI Z890 Gaming Plus WIFI) and it runs stable. So you don't need a high-end board for 8000 MT/s. For much more than 8000, I would use a mb with 2 ram slots - Asrock Z890 Taichi OCF, Asus Z890 Apex
@@brianghostfury Z890 -> Intel Core Ultra For Ryzen 9800X3D you need a B650/B650E/X670/X670E/X870/X870E motherboard. I use the ASUS TUF Gaming X670E-Plus WIFI for my tests - geni.us/Yfx3m And you don't need RAM with 8000 MT/s for Ryzen. Sweetspot is 6000 MT/s with low latency, e.g. CL 30. My ram kit for AMD - Corsair Dominator Platinum 2x16GB, 6000 CL30-36-36-76 (Expo profile) - geni.us/YBYI
It costs twice as much as a 6000 mhz one. The question is, how much is an extra 10 fps worth to whom? It doesn't matter to me whether the games run at 130 or 140 fps, I don't see a difference. I use 6400 mhz modules, which is more than enough for me. But the video is good anyway.
It costs twice as much as a 6000 mhz one. The question is, how much is an extra 10 fps worth to whom? It doesn't matter to me whether the games run at 130 or 140 fps, I don't see a difference. I use 6400 mhz modules, which is more than enough for me. But the video is good anyway.
For me its when im dealong with lower frames. Like cyberpunk and other intensive games. Ive seen some comparisons that have much better 1% lows and 20 avg more frames. so if im running 50 frames i want all my fps even if its just 10 frames so i can pass that 60 fps. When its high fps it doesnt matter too much.
💻 *PC Specs - Buy on Amazon / Newegg*
G.Skill Trident Z5 2x16GB, 8000 (@ 8200), CL38-48-48-128 - geni.us/2kfsmX
Corsair Dominator Platinum 2x16GB, 6000 CL30-36-36-76 - geni.us/YBYI
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K - geni.us/b6fBi
MSI Z890 Gaming Plus WIFI - geni.us/gno3
Nvidia Geforce RTX 4090 FE - geni.us/v2uHQY
Streacom BC1 Open Benchtable - geni.us/9PgRsf8
Custom water cooled (CPU) - MO-RA 360, EK-Quantum Velocity Full Nickel
Setup: bit.ly/3H117uA
*CPU-Z Validation:* valid.x86.fr/yd2bw8 , valid.x86.fr/rbqbm1
🎮 *Games*
00:00 Cyberpunk 2077 - Ray Tracing
00:51 Starfield
01:37 God of War Ragnarök
02:21 Remnant II
03:09 Counter Strike 2
04:05 F1 23
04:51 A Plague Tale: Requiem
05:38 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
06:37 Mount & Blade II: Bannerlord
*RAM :*
1. CMT32GX5M2B6000Z30K - Corsair Dominator Platinum 2x16GB
XMP profile 6000 CL30-36-36-76, Gear 2
2. F5-8000J3848H16GX2-TZ5RK - G.Skill Trident Z5 2x16GB
XMP profile 8000 (@ 8200) CL38-48-48-128, Gear 2
*Intel Core Ultra 9 285K:*
Bios: Intel Default Settings (PL1=PL2, 250W)
OS: Windows 11 23H2, Core Isolation (HVCI) enabled
Power options: High performance
Nvidia GPU driver: 566.03
🎥 Recorded with dual PC Setup (No FPS loss, but screen tearing..)
AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K, GC573 - amzn.to/39ODnJn
📊 Overlay - Rivatuner, HWiNFO, CapFrameX
Frametime graph: 0 - 50ms
1% LOW, AVG FPS: Average of 3 runs and logged with CapFrameX
Pls can you do 5800x3d 3600Mhz ram vs 9800x3d 8000Mhz expo ?
Getting only 3-7% improvement from going from 6000 CL30 to 8200 CL38 is disappointing, but the benchmark itself was great! Thank you.
I've been looking at the same fps on Intel past the last couple of years. Only AMD did a worthy jump this time with new 3D chip.
Same 13600K perfomance in 1440p or 4k xd
Try this at 9800X3D, u wanted to move on to 9800X3D anyways.
9800X3D is on the way, I will get the CPU on Tuesday.
Ryzen does'nt benefit of higher frequency ram
@@McLeonVP 😆
The video is about ram speed not the cpu. It's evident that with gamer cpu there are more fps
Crapzen wouldn't support such speeds , wake up you've pissed yourself
Ty for making a video with CS2 in it and actually using the D2 benchmap. I just wonder how you get so terribel FPS? I get above 1000 through the entire loop except for a few seconds on long before A site and when they blow the grenade in the B tunnels and spam their AK's then it drops to 750ish for a few seconds.
My average / 1% lows after loop is always above 900 / 300.
This is with a 14900K@6.1GHz, Patriot DDR5 8200, 4080 Super and I play on 1440x1080p, player models, ambient occlusion medium and HDR Quality and Fidelity disabled (Highest Quality)
Test the iGPU with Ram speed / timing difference, DDR5 6000 vs 8200.
Hope Intel fix this issue on december as they addressed..
Hey mate. Could you recommend some good mb for such high frequency ram? I want to make it run stable
I use a cheap z890 motherboard (MSI Z890 Gaming Plus WIFI) and it runs stable. So you don't need a high-end board for 8000 MT/s.
For much more than 8000, I would use a mb with 2 ram slots - Asrock Z890 Taichi OCF, Asus Z890 Apex
@@BENCHMARKSFORGAMERS thanks for the help. I'm looking for a mb to pair with the new 9800x3d. I'll look into that motherboard 👌🏻
@@brianghostfury Z890 -> Intel Core Ultra
For Ryzen 9800X3D you need a B650/B650E/X670/X670E/X870/X870E motherboard.
I use the ASUS TUF Gaming X670E-Plus WIFI for my tests - geni.us/Yfx3m
And you don't need RAM with 8000 MT/s for Ryzen. Sweetspot is 6000 MT/s with low latency, e.g. CL 30.
My ram kit for AMD - Corsair Dominator Platinum 2x16GB, 6000 CL30-36-36-76 (Expo profile) - geni.us/YBYI
@@BENCHMARKSFORGAMERS It's cheap but it's awesome good. MSI is top!
It costs twice as much as a 6000 mhz one. The question is, how much is an extra 10 fps worth to whom? It doesn't matter to me whether the games run at 130 or 140 fps, I don't see a difference. I use 6400 mhz modules, which is more than enough for me. But the video is good anyway.
Good vid. If you can add flight sim with your videos, that game is ultra demanding hardware.
Could you try the ram that is sold as high performance, the corsair 6000mhz CL28.
It costs twice as much as a 6000 mhz one. The question is, how much is an extra 10 fps worth to whom? It doesn't matter to me whether the games run at 130 or 140 fps, I don't see a difference. I use 6400 mhz modules, which is more than enough for me. But the video is good anyway.
For me its when im dealong with lower frames. Like cyberpunk and other intensive games. Ive seen some comparisons that have much better 1% lows and 20 avg more frames. so if im running 50 frames i want all my fps even if its just 10 frames so i can pass that 60 fps. When its high fps it doesnt matter too much.
6000MHZ*
Este teste é melhor fazer em um 7 9800x3d kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
RAM frequency Is useless
Damn, this chip has such horrible internal latency!
Not even premium RAM and motherboard can save it.
how do you know that?