I disagree, it’s more in line with his character to ragequit and abandon his problems, as we’ve seen him do at the end of age of ultron. Even if he was scared for an angry guy like the hulk all negative emotions would culminate to anger and he wanting to smash, the only thing that would make him not is if he were so angry that it broke him
I think you misunderstand what naming Blake 'Robin' is supposed to mean. It ISN'T that he is going to become the character of Robin, it is that he already IS Robin, and therefore the natural successor to the mantle of Batman.
I never understood how people actually thought Peter Parker’s emo dance was serious. The reactions from all the extras around him legit highlight the fact that he’s being comedically cringe lol.
I'm paraphrasing here, but Ridley Scott said something like, "it doesn't matter if he is or he isn't. The answer, either way, is boring. It's the question that's interesting.... but for my money yes of course he's a replicant."
That co-director or whatever of Avengers is lying, Hulk was 100% afraid of Thanos. The scenes where he refuses to come out make very little sense otherwise.
In Thor Ragnarok we see the hulk being a complete whiney baby when things don’t go his way, as someone who sometimes acts that way it 100% makes more sense that he rage quit and wanted them to leave him alone than him being afraid, he wasn’t scared he was annoyed that he wasn’t gonna win
It really blows me away that every single person who's ever seen Spider-Man 3 didn't immediately understand that Peter was acting like what a total dork would think was cool.
I'm glad you added the Parker Dancing to this because I've said over and over that the point was it was meant to be cringe. A guy who's never been cool acting how he thinks cool people act.
I think all the silly fan theories for the ending of The Thing should have been included on this list. Because people have completely misunderstood the ending of that movie.
#1 is what is wrong with most movies today. Someone, usually the director, has to explain something confusing or misunderstood in their work. That's bad writing and/or directing. If something needs explaining outside your work, you did a pisspoor job. I agree about Deckard, if for no better reason than in the book he is 100% Human.
I would have preferred if the Hulk resisted because he knew that the situation could be resolved with Banner’s brains, and the Hulk wouldn’t be able to help the situation. This forcing Banner to save the day.
In A.I. Gigolo Joe even provides a clue to the ending of the film by saying “They made us too smart, too quick and too many. We are suffering for the mistakes they made because when the end comes, all that will be left is us. That's why they hate us.”
eeeeexcept that later in the "Tesseract", Cooper feeds the same line back to TARS when he's trying to find the right moment in time. So yeah, it's the film.
In American Psycho, many people do not seem to realise it is all in Patrick Bateman's head. There are many clues, primarily people he murdered being alive in the background
Those that wake David from the ice tell him he is seen as their predecessor. David had such an impact on his time that more advancement was made finally resulting in the glass like beings that find David. They only wake him as information on that time has been lost, so they just needed to download his mind to learn more about their makers.
@@iangray1980 It is not hard to get. It is just a very dumb scene. It already has all the scenes of the dam fixing itself and the rock slide going back up the mountain etc.
Oh, they totally did. And I for one thing they are probably right. Ridley Scott has changed his own views and rewritten history about his movies before. Maybe he even believes the stuff he says, I don’t know, or maybe he just says it to keep fan controversy going once he sees how the winds are blowing, so people are talking about his movies. I’ve never really been sure which but even if so, having an implication about Decker does not mean it was actually supposed to be true, just that the implication, the possibility, is there. Sure, the ambiguity is interesting but if he was a replicant the value of the movie kind of falls apart.
Nolan was never very good at portraying emotions in his scenes. If Cooper's dialogue had cuts of her holding a photo crying while carressing his boyfriends image that would've improved things.
@@thesonofdormammu5475 - Ok, assume for a second that Deckard is a replicant (he's not but I'll go with it to make a point). At what point does that help him hunt down the escaped replicants? It doesn't, not in any way. Each of them handily beats the snot out of Deckard at every opportunity. He's clearly significantly weaker than all of them, pretty useless for a replicant hunting replicant, pretty accurate for a replicant hunting human.
This is a bad video. It either presents things that are painfully obvious that most people understood, or it makes wild speculations that are either his fan theory or an incorrect theory.
…oh man…they were clearly trying to suggest that Superman was reversing time by ‘rolling’ back the worlds circulation. I can’t even be bothered to get into why time travel is impossible but let’s just say it involves relativity. If it was possible to travel at the speed of light (which it isn’t) then what happens is that time just seems like it’s incredibly slow when you get near to that speed. If you could travel at the speed of light everything would effectively be still. Again, it’s to do with relativity. They addressed this pretty well in Interstellar. In short, you can’t reverse time but superman, if he could travel at the speed of light, would be basically at a never ending pause
Well… 1, you did not understand the explanation given here 2, it was the 70s 3, time travel is not real, but Superman isn’t either, so in this fictional world real life laws don’t apply
Tachyons travel backwards in time... theoretically. Time slows as you approach light speed and stops at the speed of light and reverses at FTL speed. Again theoretically.
In Superman, time dilation tied to velocity slows time not reverse. so it is still stupid. So travelling the speed of light is impossible but lets say you traveled from earth to pluto and back at 99.999% of C, it would seem to you it had been a few minutes but on earth it would have been 11 hours
That is the real world rule of relativistic travel. The movie is implying faster than light travel which is a different thing. Essentially it’s implying that he turned himself into a tachyon. Still ridiculous and stupid but that’s what they were going for.
Spiderman 3 is absolutely trying to portray Peter as cool. Multiple characters in the film act like he's cool. He flirts with Betty who is into it. When he buys the suit, woman on the street look like they are into him. And people in the club cheer him on while he is dancing
I think you need to look at that scene again. At first the women around seem to like it, because it is from his point of view. But as the scene moves on, the film reveals how people are REALLY reacting to him, and it is overwhelmingly negative.
![F.HERO Ft. JSPKK x ลำไย ไหทองคำ x M-PEE - ไม่สนิทบิดหมด (Thai Riders Anthem) [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kPJZ0UihBfk/mqdefault.jpg)
I think the Hulk being afraid of Thanos is actually much deeper and more complex than the Hulk just going "No, solve your own problems".
I disagree, it’s more in line with his character to ragequit and abandon his problems, as we’ve seen him do at the end of age of ultron. Even if he was scared for an angry guy like the hulk all negative emotions would culminate to anger and he wanting to smash, the only thing that would make him not is if he were so angry that it broke him
I think you misunderstand what naming Blake 'Robin' is supposed to mean. It ISN'T that he is going to become the character of Robin, it is that he already IS Robin, and therefore the natural successor to the mantle of Batman.
I never understood how people actually thought Peter Parker’s emo dance was serious. The reactions from all the extras around him legit highlight the fact that he’s being comedically cringe lol.
I can't stop laughing at "I'm Robin!" at the end.
You are exactly right about Deckard not being a replicant. That idea doesn't make any sense at all in regard to the rest of the movie.
I'm paraphrasing here, but Ridley Scott said something like, "it doesn't matter if he is or he isn't. The answer, either way, is boring. It's the question that's interesting.... but for my money yes of course he's a replicant."
That co-director or whatever of Avengers is lying, Hulk was 100% afraid of Thanos. The scenes where he refuses to come out make very little sense otherwise.
In Thor Ragnarok we see the hulk being a complete whiney baby when things don’t go his way, as someone who sometimes acts that way it 100% makes more sense that he rage quit and wanted them to leave him alone than him being afraid, he wasn’t scared he was annoyed that he wasn’t gonna win
It really blows me away that every single person who's ever seen Spider-Man 3 didn't immediately understand that Peter was acting like what a total dork would think was cool.
I'm glad you added the Parker Dancing to this because I've said over and over that the point was it was meant to be cringe. A guy who's never been cool acting how he thinks cool people act.
That hulk explanation is too convoluted to be true and seems like a retcon. Nice try!
I think all the silly fan theories for the ending of The Thing should have been included on this list. Because people have completely misunderstood the ending of that movie.
I know, I was totally expecting to see that here and really can’t believe it wasn’t. A perfect 10th item.
Why do you say Deckard like that?
#1 is what is wrong with most movies today. Someone, usually the director, has to explain something confusing or misunderstood in their work. That's bad writing and/or directing. If something needs explaining outside your work, you did a pisspoor job.
I agree about Deckard, if for no better reason than in the book he is 100% Human.
I would have preferred if the Hulk resisted because he knew that the situation could be resolved with Banner’s brains, and the Hulk wouldn’t be able to help the situation. This forcing Banner to save the day.
Been a while since I've seen AI, but don't the robots explicitly state they were the descendants of human creations?
In A.I. Gigolo Joe even provides a clue to the ending of the film by saying “They made us too smart, too quick and too many. We are suffering for the mistakes they made because when the end comes, all that will be left is us. That's why they hate us.”
eeeeexcept that later in the "Tesseract", Cooper feeds the same line back to TARS when he's trying to find the right moment in time. So yeah, it's the film.
In American Psycho, many people do not seem to realise it is all in Patrick Bateman's head. There are many clues, primarily people he murdered being alive in the background
never ever thought Deckard was a replicant!!!
Those that wake David from the ice tell him he is seen as their predecessor. David had such an impact on his time that more advancement was made finally resulting in the glass like beings that find David. They only wake him as information on that time has been lost, so they just needed to download his mind to learn more about their makers.
If Deckard is a replicant why is he the only one that's weak like us compared to reps? 😂 Why is he the only one who lives for decades?
In freddy vs jason jason isn't afraid of water he is in the dream world the water reminds him of when he drowned
1:08 but this was made clear that the Hulk wasn't scared. Even Bruce said it, we have some issues
There are only 9 moments I actually understood in the Star Wars sequel trilogy
4:56 come on, these facts are mediocre. We knew this, especially with Shutter Island
Deckard is definitely a replicant.
Then why does Superman have to "restart" the Earth by switching direction? If they'd left that off, your explanation would have made sense.
You really still don't get it? He was going back in time. The rewinding stuff was just to show that lol.
@@iangray1980 It is not hard to get. It is just a very dumb scene. It already has all the scenes of the dam fixing itself and the rock slide going back up the mountain etc.
@fredgarvinism dumb or cool as hell? I guess some of us just don't appreciate rad things
@@iangray1980 OK, lol I'll give it to you. In 78 playing film backwards while superman flew around the earth probably seemed cool to me too.
@@fredgarvinism idk about 78 but it blew my goddamn mind in 1987 when I first saw it
I’ve never misunderstood anything! Not once! Not one time!
Ignore me.
Did you guys really just say that Ridley Scott was wrong about his own movie (Blade Runner)?
They did. They are wrong.
Oh, they totally did. And I for one thing they are probably right. Ridley Scott has changed his own views and rewritten history about his movies before. Maybe he even believes the stuff he says, I don’t know, or maybe he just says it to keep fan controversy going once he sees how the winds are blowing, so people are talking about his movies. I’ve never really been sure which but even if so, having an implication about Decker does not mean it was actually supposed to be true, just that the implication, the possibility, is there. Sure, the ambiguity is interesting but if he was a replicant the value of the movie kind of falls apart.
Nolan was never very good at portraying emotions in his scenes. If Cooper's dialogue had cuts of her holding a photo crying while carressing his boyfriends image that would've improved things.
Oh please the Hulk was scared...love was proven to be transcendent in the tesseract ...who wrote this? did they watch the movies? I quit.
That isn't what Interstellar tells us. At all.
@@rpriske Enlighten me, but its exactly what Cooper says at the 2:30:30 mark
Cooper: Love TARS love, its like Brand said my connection with Murph it is quantifiable..
Deckard is absolutely a replicant.
Your argument about the other scenes assumes that the other replicants know he is. They don't.
I'm not convinced that Deckard himself knows he's a replicant. Who better to hunt down replicants than a replicant that thinks he's a human?
@@thesonofdormammu5475 - Ok, assume for a second that Deckard is a replicant (he's not but I'll go with it to make a point). At what point does that help him hunt down the escaped replicants? It doesn't, not in any way. Each of them handily beats the snot out of Deckard at every opportunity. He's clearly significantly weaker than all of them, pretty useless for a replicant hunting replicant, pretty accurate for a replicant hunting human.
I'm surprised people didn't realize Superman was going the speed of light. That seemed pretty obvious
This is a bad video. It either presents things that are painfully obvious that most people understood, or it makes wild speculations that are either his fan theory or an incorrect theory.
…oh man…they were clearly trying to suggest that Superman was reversing time by ‘rolling’ back the worlds circulation. I can’t even be bothered to get into why time travel is impossible but let’s just say it involves relativity. If it was possible to travel at the speed of light (which it isn’t) then what happens is that time just seems like it’s incredibly slow when you get near to that speed. If you could travel at the speed of light everything would effectively be still. Again, it’s to do with relativity. They addressed this pretty well in Interstellar. In short, you can’t reverse time but superman, if he could travel at the speed of light, would be basically at a never ending pause
Uh... fiction.
Well…
1, you did not understand the explanation given here
2, it was the 70s
3, time travel is not real, but Superman isn’t either, so in this fictional world real life laws don’t apply
Tachyons travel backwards in time... theoretically.
Time slows as you approach light speed and stops at the speed of light and reverses at FTL speed. Again theoretically.
Na he’s defo Robin I
In Superman, time dilation tied to velocity slows time not reverse. so it is still stupid. So travelling the speed of light is impossible but lets say you traveled from earth to pluto and back at 99.999% of C, it would seem to you it had been a few minutes but on earth it would have been 11 hours
That is the real world rule of relativistic travel. The movie is implying faster than light travel which is a different thing. Essentially it’s implying that he turned himself into a tachyon. Still ridiculous and stupid but that’s what they were going for.
'hes not a replicant because it makes other scenes better' is idiotic
😂😂😂
Spiderman 3 is absolutely trying to portray Peter as cool. Multiple characters in the film act like he's cool. He flirts with Betty who is into it. When he buys the suit, woman on the street look like they are into him. And people in the club cheer him on while he is dancing
I think you need to look at that scene again. At first the women around seem to like it, because it is from his point of view. But as the scene moves on, the film reveals how people are REALLY reacting to him, and it is overwhelmingly negative.