I can’t believe they are allowing another trial on taxpayers dime and wasting time of the jurors that have to miss work to sit through this joke of a court case. Love ya Emily! Thank you! ❤
If that soft 9/3 jury is right I think they would have been sent back their note felt otherwise if it was more to the note I think the judge would have put those two charges on the record and let the jury go
I feel so sorry for KR. This has literally ruined her life these last couple of years. There is not enough evidence to prosecute. The commonwealth is way overreaching-this could be any of us. 😒
@@jfk32975 corrupt politicians and government officials are rampant in the US. In fact, ALL the officers in this trial were drinking and driving, some in tax-dollar-funded police vehicles.
@@jfk32975Unfortunately every adult in this case, including the cops, have no problem with that. Lots of these people had 6-7 or more drinks and got behind the wheel in a snow storm without a second thought. Cops included. It’s disgusting. They all think they’re above the law. McCabes + Alberts = assholes
I thought it was totally inappropriate for Bev to offer to call the judge at a different court to use her position to get the judge to change the trial date in that case. If I was a judge and received that call I'd tell her to kick rocks and then make it very clear how inappropriate the call was and how much I absolutely did not appreciate her trying to influence any part of a case that was in front of me.....but that's just me
I wonder why it never came out the JOK made multiple complaints to Canton PD about Colin dealing substances in the neighborhood… it was on CW notice of discovery that JOK sent a video to Kevin Albert and made several calls to 911 and sent several emails to the PD re: Colin’s “well-known activities” in the neighborhood…
@bufnel yeah because she definitely had to be drinking to allow the shenanigans that happened in this case in her court room. This judge makes me glad that I decided on education instead of law.
I saw someone in the comments after the mistrial claim they lived in the area and claim that she was well known to be friends of the A and McA families.. after the trial date being set again despite this coming out and an FBI investigation running concurrently AND two of the main cops in this case being “rehomed”… seems that claim has some teeth
Realistically, how difficult would it be to find jurors who Haven't seen social media and the evidence that wasn't presented in the court room? I'd be interested to see how jury selection goes.
They don't have to have not seen any media or know anything about the case.....they just have to have not made up their mind and say they are willing to listen to the evidence and can remain fair and impartial and will decide the case only on the evidence presented at trial.
Not defending, but if the person would have been guilty, I think people would support the lenghts it would take no matter how long it takes? For example - Depp defamation case was taking a long time - restrictions, divorce, UK, and then USA. And people kind of supported the lengths it took, because we eventually got Amber lying and making stuff up.
I can’t do another 9 weeks of “Captain What if Anything” I love EDB and LawNerds but I can’t sit through Lally ever again! He couldn’t find a question with a magnifying glass and an army of helpers.
@@kitijamironcuka778but imagine anyone who doesn’t have the money KR does and is deemed guilty by cops like Proctor for simply having “no a** and a leaky balloon knot” who can’t afford a defense like AJ or won’t have the public hearing with extremely niche experts coming out of the woodwork like the fabulously knowledgeable ER doctor/ former officer/ forensic pathologist/ dog bite expert… how many of those people have been put away?
You can’t appeal. An appeal it’s to change or reverse a sentence. There’s not sentencing here it was a mistrial so you can’t appeal a mistrial. The appeals could come in the future after the second trial and by that time her finances could be exhausted. I just pray for divine intervention!❤
@@mariapilarmeit’s a quote from the judge, from this hearing. It refers to appealing whatever decision she makes on the motion. She’s saying she knows either way she decides the other side will appeal.
Love hearing you say scheduling attorneys is like herding cats. When I try to schedule medical teams I just call it trying to stuff a bunch of wet cats into a bag.
Egos are a funny thing. Doctors seem to have big egos. I’m sure in the same way judges do. It can be quite frustrating for those that have to work with them or work under them.
Q: What's the difference between doctors and surgeons? A: doctors think they're god and surgeons know they are. A lot of attorneys have egos even bigger than doctors imo.. and some are humble and you'd never know their profession. Either way, I want the doctor/lawyer/surgeon who is the absolute best/ #1 in their field... and that usually comes with a giant ego- rightfully so... idgaf how big their ego is and how cocky and/or unlikeable they are. I'll deal with that to get the absolute best.
And for those of us who are patients of these people who believe they are Gods and so many of them are just awful with patients. I know of what I speak. I’ve seen so many specialists and unfortunately, the vast majority of the over 30 that I’ve seen were arrogant, dismissive and won’t lower themselves to answer our questions. It’s even worse if they can’t snap their fingers and get a diagnosis, or even speak to you at all if they’re wrong about their diagnosis. If you’re a doctor, or lawyer be kind to your clients/patients.
@@jaimiemason4933 my son was recently hospitalized and almost had to have surgery. The surgeon that was scheduled for him was very likable and down to earth. Word kept trickling in from staff members of the hospital and from family members and friends who had been operated on by this doctor and said he was one of the best. When he came back to my son’s room to tell him he didn’t have to have surgery. I told him what I had learned about him and he blushed. A 65-year-old man full on blushing when receiving accolades about his surgical prowess. If I ever need surgery, that’s who I’m going to. Rare to find someone of his caliber with such humility.
@@jfk32975 The prosecution did not prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt. It should have been NG on all counts IMO. I'm not 100% certain that she's innocent, but she's not guilty based on the evidence.
@@jfk32975um… here in America we are still presumed innocent… that is… that we did NOT commit the crime of which we’re accused… unless we’re found guilty in a court of law. You may recall… Read was NOT found guilty of the crime she was charged with committing. Soooo… in the spirit of what remains of our Constitution… you’re mistaken.
I certainly hope after all this you’re going to cover whatever comes our way with this case. 🤞🏼@legalbytes mentioned the Judge could bring back the Jurors & have them fill out their forms & then go forward.
All defense needs is to wait until FBI comes back with their results. That's all they need for her to walk. The jurors didn't know defense called experts who were hired by FBI to investigate the badly done detective work....
This judge needs to be reported and also needs to recuse herself but beyond that she needs her license taken away because there is far too much evidence for this to have never went to trial. The case should have been thrown out. I'm really disgusted by judges and prosecutors that are trying to bring cases that should have never been taken on by a prosecutor anyway.. pure corruption
I get easily overstimulated with noise also. Always had mixed emotions about loud events. I would be 17 bringing ear plugs to a live concert. I love loud as long as I've got my ear plugs! Lol!
@laniakea2162 I don't know, i have not seen a legitimate report that there was a policeman and a lawyer on the jury. That seems to be the rumor, though.
@@hopefulhuman to me it seems to make sense they WOULDN’T get accepted into a jury. Too much bias and not ethical - especially a policeman from that area.
As far as the wall of sound (last section of live) goes, I love feeling it in my body, but my ears CANNOT handle the bass--not even in a car or a car passing by. Just OW. My fiance (he's fine) had a home care nurse drop by with a trainee and the trainee smelled like she'd BATHED in her perfume. It was lovely but there was too much and I was choking in my own home. At least the scent didn't linger when they left
How will the new trial work with those cops that are under investigation? I’m not really familiar with the info on that, I just read that some of the cops that were called to testify, were under investigation..
Please please please cover the Crystal Roger's case when it is on trial. She deserves your Law Nerd group. It's a tragic story, please look in to it. She was murdered , than her father was from investigating. Please spotlight her♥️🤞
I hope this comment reaches Emily but I hope we take a look at the Karen Swift trial out of Tennessee in May - the jury was at an impasse and the Judge asked them about their impasse on each count and he did it very thoroughly. What stopped Judge Canone from doing the same?
I wish Girardi was able to be streamed, but given that it won't be, I don't think it would be worthwhile to have daily court coverage. It's a shame though. When a lawyer harms the profession the way he has, everyone should see the results.
Thanks for breaking this down EDB! Changed my profile pic :) figured I’d give you my first vid comment! Won’t have time to watch it all, but you are wonderful so I know I’ll finish it later 💜
Sounds like the judge has already made up her mind on the motions to dismiss! This judge shouldn't be the one to decide she was biased throughout the original trial and is the problem of not asking the jury questions when it ended!
Absolutely judge Bev is biased!..she treats the def atty badly. She's condescending and rude to them!.I'm sick of listening to her huff and puff while twirling her glasses while the def is questioning witnesses..she rushes the def attys but not the CW!..
In Depp v Heard, much was made on the anniversary of one of the incidents. Will much be made of the anniversary of JOK's death on what will be day 3 of the new trial?
@daniellemarie3121 That was the atty for the appeal. Sadly Mr Yanetti said to an outside reporter it is still TBD as to whether Mr Jackson will return 😢
Question ❓ Not particularly for this case just a general question - if a defendant is acquitted or found not guilty that doesn't mean innocent but if a defendant knows they are 100% innocent how do they get the court to recognise they are innocent and what are the steps that need to be taken? Is innocent an exoneration or what is it called?
Can somebody explain the immense hate for Bev? I agree she has a rough tone, but she’s been pretty fair and consistent. Every time she reprimanded the defense, the defense deserved to be reprimanded. They made multiple inappropriate comments throughout the trial (they knew what they were doing). So if that’s the only reason, it’s not a good one. I also agree that things seemed fishy at the end of the trial, but the instructions she gave were the typical instructions in Mass that both sides agreed on. With the amount of hate and personal attacks I see online about her and everybody else, I completely understand why the jurors are terrified for their names to come out. It’s just not necessary.
@@Johnny-ci8mw I'm on rewatch, but I think a big part of it came from pretrial. She was kinda brutal to the defense. I expected her to be less fair throughout the trial, but I thought she was for the most part a lot better. Seeing so much hate coming from so many, it's 😢
I think from what I read it’s as doeb said she should have recused herself and became more abrasive through that process she was less abrasive during trial but has also made ruling that don’t make sense then got angry when lawyers followed her rulings argh but that doesn’t excuse nasty attacks to anyone
I am also very picky about how sound is mixed when im at shows 😂 neuro spicy 4 sure lol. I always rant and rave about shows i go to when the sound is perfect 👌 ❤
I don't think I'm completely clueless, couldn't this 5-minute scheduling meeting have been resolved via Skype? Zoom? Teams? IDK...maybe we will get a real housewives of Canton? Just seemed a bit outrageous with security, flights etc just for this. BUT, what do I know? Also, I am wondering if the last jury feel as if their deliberations didn't matter. We know that she was found not guilty on some & it seems to be discredited imo
That's what they said. In the eyes of the court, they made no decision. They were unable to reach a verdict. They did not fill out the forms. So technically, we don't know anything. We know they couldn't reach a verdict.
wow first commenter?!? i have never been first here!! -- also!!!!!! please do NOT tell me that dude on Karens team is taking AJs place... ill cry. Watching him in trial is incredible. Poor Karen this has taken over her life....
No that lawyer filed those motions because of all the fuckery with the jury . She was not guilty on charges 1&3 … Her team couldn’t file the motions, legally
I can’t believe they are allowing another trial on taxpayers dime and wasting time of the jurors that have to miss work to sit through this joke of a court case. Love ya Emily! Thank you! ❤
Agree
Also, agree…..
If that soft 9/3 jury is right I think they would have been sent back their note felt otherwise if it was more to the note I think the judge would have put those two charges on the record and let the jury go
But what if it *snowed*?
You need a soundboard item for "she did not, in fact, fix it in post." 😂😂
They are dragging this out. Please FEDS bring the indictments STAT
i do hope that 6 months is long enough for them to get some sort of answers
I was surprised that they were discussing a trial date before 2026 to be honest.
@@amireallythatgrumpy6508me too but what do I know about law.
@@amireallythatgrumpy6508 they have to schedule something within 1 year of mistrial and i’m sure they want to leave space for continuances
I feel so sorry for KR. This has literally ruined her life these last couple of years. There is not enough evidence to prosecute. The commonwealth is way overreaching-this could be any of us. 😒
Not f you don’t drink and drive
@@jfk32975 corrupt politicians and government officials are rampant in the US. In fact, ALL the officers in this trial were drinking and driving, some in tax-dollar-funded police vehicles.
@@jfk32975Unfortunately every adult in this case, including the cops, have no problem with that. Lots of these people had 6-7 or more drinks and got behind the wheel in a snow storm without a second thought. Cops included. It’s disgusting. They all think they’re above the law. McCabes + Alberts = assholes
@@tsyzdekamen to that
@@jfk32975 What about all the cops who also drank and drove in this case? KR seemed to be the only one who was sober.
Question: What if the FBI investigation comes to a different conclusion and maybe a different suspect than the Commonwealth, what would happen?
“My judge will call your judge and see if you can come to work…”
The insights into trial and court are fascinating!
I feel like I couldn't of made any of this up if I tried. Who knew!!!
LOL
I thought it was totally inappropriate for Bev to offer to call the judge at a different court to use her position to get the judge to change the trial date in that case. If I was a judge and received that call I'd tell her to kick rocks and then make it very clear how inappropriate the call was and how much I absolutely did not appreciate her trying to influence any part of a case that was in front of me.....but that's just me
This is the epitome of “this could have been an email” 😂😂
That’s what I was thinking lol
Except Emily explained why it wasn’t.
There would be so much back-and-forth trying to get dates agreed on. And it is a murder trial, after all.
Karen Read is selling her beautiful home in Mansfield MA...This has changed her life and I 🙏 she vindicated... Love your coverage..Linda🌷
She planned on selling it before THE INCIDENT....
Apparently she had been barely there for a while
I would sell and get outta there also. Whether I was guilty or not. Screw that place. Absolutely no one was her friend.
@@shazzasees barely there because she was staying with John so much?
It Would Be Fantastic If The 12 Jurors Are At The Dismissal Hearing! Bring It Bev 😅
I wonder why it never came out the JOK made multiple complaints to Canton PD about Colin dealing substances in the neighborhood… it was on CW notice of discovery that JOK sent a video to Kevin Albert and made several calls to 911 and sent several emails to the PD re: Colin’s “well-known activities” in the neighborhood…
They booked a date in court in order to book another date in court😅
Seriously. 😒. Should have been a video conference.
Let’s have a meeting about the meeting….. utter bull shit
Which is why the next hearing is so far away because there is so many of these minor court events that take up so much of everyone time and money
100% typical.... source: paralegal with 10+ years of experience
“You can’t go forward on scheduling without dealing with these motions”
Bev: hold my beer
Lol 😂
You mean White Claw 😂
@bufnel yeah because she definitely had to be drinking to allow the shenanigans that happened in this case in her court room. This judge makes me glad that I decided on education instead of law.
Bev can do anything to protect the corrupt cartel she is a active member of.
Corrupt Mass.
I saw someone in the comments after the mistrial claim they lived in the area and claim that she was well known to be friends of the A and McA families.. after the trial date being set again despite this coming out and an FBI investigation running concurrently AND two of the main cops in this case being “rehomed”… seems that claim has some teeth
Lally is so obnoxious, how can he seriously bring himself back into court after watching that trial the first time
"What if anything......."
This trial needs to be moved to New Mexico and the same judge that proceeded the Baldwin trial
Omg I wish
Also karen stay strong!! Your case is so important and you represent so many people who love and support you!
Realistically, how difficult would it be to find jurors who Haven't seen social media and the evidence that wasn't presented in the court room? I'd be interested to see how jury selection goes.
They don't have to have not seen any media or know anything about the case.....they just have to have not made up their mind and say they are willing to listen to the evidence and can remain fair and impartial and will decide the case only on the evidence presented at trial.
I could see a change of venue just so they can find a jury that won't be in fear of the local nutters.
Hello beautiful Emily. Thank you for the update.
Is the judge and prosecutor team wanting to milk Karen of all the money she may have? The emotional trauma on her is a lot.
This has been the definition of a malicious prosecution
If you can't beat her.... bankrupt her!!! It's a solid strategy albeit unethical.
Not defending, but if the person would have been guilty, I think people would support the lenghts it would take no matter how long it takes? For example - Depp defamation case was taking a long time - restrictions, divorce, UK, and then USA. And people kind of supported the lengths it took, because we eventually got Amber lying and making stuff up.
I can’t do another 9 weeks of “Captain What if Anything” I love EDB and LawNerds but I can’t sit through Lally ever again! He couldn’t find a question with a magnifying glass and an army of helpers.
@@kitijamironcuka778but imagine anyone who doesn’t have the money KR does and is deemed guilty by cops like Proctor for simply having “no a** and a leaky balloon knot” who can’t afford a defense like AJ or won’t have the public hearing with extremely niche experts coming out of the woodwork like the fabulously knowledgeable ER doctor/ former officer/ forensic pathologist/ dog bite expert… how many of those people have been put away?
“I assume whichever way I rule on the Motion to Dismiss will be appealed” 😂
You can’t appeal. An appeal it’s to change or reverse a sentence. There’s not sentencing here it was a mistrial so you can’t appeal a mistrial. The appeals could come in the future after the second trial and by that time her finances could be exhausted. I just pray for divine intervention!❤
@@mariapilarme We're talking about appealing just the decision on the Motion to Dismiss, not appealing the verdict.
@@mariapilarmeit’s a quote from the judge, from this hearing. It refers to appealing whatever decision she makes on the motion. She’s saying she knows either way she decides the other side will appeal.
Happy birthday to everyone and congratulations to the lawyer that’s going to law
It was a Musical morning in my household with my kid, my fiance, and myself crying our eyes out to RENT, so I'm on Replay Crew today, ❤
Replay crew!! Thank you for covering today Emily 💜
Love hearing you say scheduling attorneys is like herding cats. When I try to schedule medical teams I just call it trying to stuff a bunch of wet cats into a bag.
Hi my replay crew. ASD and adhd demon time in Ireland so no sleep 🇮🇪😂
Egos are a funny thing. Doctors seem to have big egos. I’m sure in the same way judges do. It can be quite frustrating for those that have to work with them or work under them.
That God complex can get to ya eeekkk.
Q: What's the difference between doctors and surgeons?
A: doctors think they're god and surgeons know they are.
A lot of attorneys have egos even bigger than doctors imo.. and some are humble and you'd never know their profession.
Either way, I want the doctor/lawyer/surgeon who is the absolute best/ #1 in their field... and that usually comes with a giant ego- rightfully so... idgaf how big their ego is and how cocky and/or unlikeable they are. I'll deal with that to get the absolute best.
And for those of us who are patients of these people who believe they are Gods and so many of them are just awful with patients. I know of what I speak. I’ve seen so many specialists and unfortunately, the vast majority of the over 30 that I’ve seen were arrogant, dismissive and won’t lower themselves to answer our questions. It’s even worse if they can’t snap their fingers and get a diagnosis, or even speak to you at all if they’re wrong about their diagnosis. If you’re a doctor, or lawyer be kind to your clients/patients.
@@jaimiemason4933 my son was recently hospitalized and almost had to have surgery. The surgeon that was scheduled for him was very likable and down to earth. Word kept trickling in from staff members of the hospital and from family members and friends who had been operated on by this doctor and said he was one of the best.
When he came back to my son’s room to tell him he didn’t have to have surgery. I told him what I had learned about him and he blushed. A 65-year-old man full on blushing when receiving accolades about his surgical prowess. If I ever need surgery, that’s who I’m going to. Rare to find someone of his caliber with such humility.
This ridiculous just let her go already! There’s entirely too much reasonable doubt. Way too many suspicious incidents in this is case
Sorry she committed a crime and I don’t believe for one minute that they actually voted 12-0 for NG.
@@jfk32975 The prosecution did not prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt.
It should have been NG on all counts IMO. I'm not 100% certain that she's innocent, but she's not guilty based on the evidence.
@@jfk32975um… here in America we are still presumed innocent… that is… that we did NOT commit the crime of which we’re accused… unless we’re found guilty in a court of law. You may recall… Read was NOT found guilty of the crime she was charged with committing. Soooo… in the spirit of what remains of our Constitution… you’re mistaken.
@@jfk32975you really believe shes guilty based on solo cup evidence and proof of no broken tail light. Wow.
@@sara_387 I agree
I certainly hope after all this you’re going to cover whatever comes our way with this case. 🤞🏼@legalbytes mentioned the Judge could bring back the Jurors & have them fill out their forms & then go forward.
All defense needs is to wait until FBI comes back with their results. That's all they need for her to walk. The jurors didn't know defense called experts who were hired by FBI to investigate the badly done detective work....
Had to be on replay crew. But still loving it!
If the jury had a question --- they should have asked....how hard is that ??
Another jury trial is such a waste of resources
This judge needs to be reported and also needs to recuse herself but beyond that she needs her license taken away because there is far too much evidence for this to have never went to trial. The case should have been thrown out. I'm really disgusted by judges and prosecutors that are trying to bring cases that should have never been taken on by a prosecutor anyway.. pure corruption
.?...??..?...❤❤❤WHY ISN'T IT MANDATORY THAT THAT JURY SLIP BE FILLED OUT?..?.??
The retrial is going to take ten weeks and Lally will bring in the coffee shop attendants
I remember Papa Tragos (LYK) saying that he knew the new lawyer for Defence and that he was v. good and older than him. lol
One of the jurors went to CBS Boston. They said the same thing as the others.
Did they speak? I will try to find it
I didn’t see it. Was it an interview.
I get easily overstimulated with noise also. Always had mixed emotions about loud events. I would be 17 bringing ear plugs to a live concert. I love loud as long as I've got my ear plugs! Lol!
Good morning!!!
Let's hope this new jury know what their doing.. the last jury didnt seem to know the law even though they had a lawyer and a policeman in the jury...
Hi, I’m curious how you know there was a lawyer and policeman on the jury. I’m guessing you actually don’t know that?
@@laniakea2162you must be new this
@laniakea2162 I don't know, i have not seen a legitimate report that there was a policeman and a lawyer on the jury. That seems to be the rumor, though.
@@hopefulhuman to me it seems to make sense they WOULDN’T get accepted into a jury. Too much bias and not ethical - especially a policeman from that area.
For Food Court you may want to look into the boneless chicken wing case before the Ohio Supreme Court. I am a big fan. Thank you for all that you do!
EDB- missed and rewatching 😊! Enjoy your day!
As far as the wall of sound (last section of live) goes, I love feeling it in my body, but my ears CANNOT handle the bass--not even in a car or a car passing by. Just OW.
My fiance (he's fine) had a home care nurse drop by with a trainee and the trainee smelled like she'd BATHED in her perfume. It was lovely but there was too much and I was choking in my own home. At least the scent didn't linger when they left
Date set for retrial is January 27. Date John O'Keefe left out in the snow with a head injury, January 29.
Yes i noticed that
Yes the third anniversary is Day 3 of retrial.
???.?.WHY ISN'T IT MANDATORY THE JURY SLIP FILLED OUT??. PLEASE ANAWE❤
My birthday is Friday too! Happy Birthday Law Nerd twinkies! ❤🎉
The way I ran to Netflix to watch more AJ. He’s just phenomenal in action.
Same here!
Me too 😊
I want to run and watch AJ in action! How did I miss what's going on? What is the show on Netflix that he is in? Thanks
Is there something on Netflix already? Spill the beans
@@therealdeal3672 it’s called Homicide Los Angeles, someone commented about it in the live
Off topic, but, "It's like herding cats, on catnip, in a yarn factory".. I DIED!! 🤣🤣
Replay crew… I can see live chat replay now?!?! Hooray!!!
New judge
Yaya more Jen McCabe and trooper proctor!
Replay crew ❤❤ Team Karen Read 💯💯💯💯💯 love love love EDB 💜💜💜
Replay crew today, but excited you’re covering this!!
Watching on replay❤
Same. Catching it right after the live ended 😫
Member of the ReplayCrew representing! I do have to ask, did they go quickly to avoid all that snow? /sarcasm
How will the new trial work with those cops that are under investigation? I’m not really familiar with the info on that, I just read that some of the cops that were called to testify, were under investigation..
Question - is Jackson for the Read trial the same Jackson that was an attorney for the judge who dated Girardi?
Please please please cover the Crystal Roger's case when it is on trial. She deserves your Law Nerd group. It's a tragic story, please look in to it. She was murdered , than her father was from investigating. Please spotlight her♥️🤞
In which state did this occur in?
I hope this comment reaches Emily but I hope we take a look at the Karen Swift trial out of Tennessee in May - the jury was at an impasse and the Judge asked them about their impasse on each count and he did it very thoroughly. What stopped Judge Canone from doing the same?
Cannone's incompetence.
I wish Girardi was able to be streamed, but given that it won't be, I don't think it would be worthwhile to have daily court coverage. It's a shame though. When a lawyer harms the profession the way he has, everyone should see the results.
Yes
Thanks for breaking this down EDB!
Changed my profile pic :) figured I’d give you my first vid comment! Won’t have time to watch it all, but you are wonderful so I know I’ll finish it later 💜
How much did today cost ?
🇬🇧 squad
Yes!!
Replay crew Woot woot 🎉
Still can’t hear anyone in this damned CR.
Will all the stuff they kept out of first trial be kept out of this one?
Of course oral arguments are on my birthday 😂
Sounds like the judge has already made up her mind on the motions to dismiss! This judge shouldn't be the one to decide she was biased throughout the original trial and is the problem of not asking the jury questions when it ended!
Does anyone else think the judge is biased for the state?
Absolutely judge Bev is biased!..she treats the def atty badly. She's condescending and rude to them!.I'm sick of listening to her huff and puff while twirling her glasses while the def is questioning witnesses..she rushes the def attys but not the CW!..
Yes I think Judge Bev has been and is bias. IMO
imo this judge is part of the coverup 👀
No
@@lyndaanne3589
🤭
I guess I am on the replay team. I fell asleep during the live steeam
In Depp v Heard, much was made on the anniversary of one of the incidents. Will much be made of the anniversary of JOK's death on what will be day 3 of the new trial?
@daniellemarie3121 That was the atty for the appeal. Sadly Mr Yanetti said to an outside reporter it is still TBD as to whether Mr Jackson will return 😢
this footage is MUCH clearer, where was this all trial 🤣
Q if I didn’t know better, is the new lawyer on KR side is the caretaker at Hogwarts?????
Could he be AJ'S replacement ?😬🤔☺️
I've heard he's the attorney for the appeal but that's not confirmed... I laughed when I read this comment though
@@shazzasees Not a replacement, AJ is still on the case.
Guys Alan Jackson is in a Netflix doc and I recognized him by voice 😂 that's how much of this I've watched
I have a question this trail be in a different court ? That what I have heard online from reading a article about the trial
Question ❓
Not particularly for this case just a general question - if a defendant is acquitted or found not guilty that doesn't mean innocent but if a defendant knows they are 100% innocent how do they get the court to recognise they are innocent and what are the steps that need to be taken?
Is innocent an exoneration or what is it called?
Can somebody explain the immense hate for Bev? I agree she has a rough tone, but she’s been pretty fair and consistent. Every time she reprimanded the defense, the defense deserved to be reprimanded. They made multiple inappropriate comments throughout the trial (they knew what they were doing). So if that’s the only reason, it’s not a good one.
I also agree that things seemed fishy at the end of the trial, but the instructions she gave were the typical instructions in Mass that both sides agreed on.
With the amount of hate and personal attacks I see online about her and everybody else, I completely understand why the jurors are terrified for their names to come out. It’s just not necessary.
@@Johnny-ci8mw I'm on rewatch, but I think a big part of it came from pretrial. She was kinda brutal to the defense. I expected her to be less fair throughout the trial, but I thought she was for the most part a lot better. Seeing so much hate coming from so many, it's 😢
Because she has ties to the McCabes. Because of those ties, the defense asked her to recuse herself and she just said “naah”
I think from what I read it’s as doeb said she should have recused herself and became more abrasive through that process she was less abrasive during trial but has also made ruling that don’t make sense then got angry when lawyers followed her rulings argh but that doesn’t excuse nasty attacks to anyone
Why couldn't they do this scheduling at the end of the trial?
They still needed to to decide that they were going to retrial.
I am also very picky about how sound is mixed when im at shows 😂 neuro spicy 4 sure lol. I always rant and rave about shows i go to when the sound is perfect 👌 ❤
Who is the new lawyer for the defense?
Martin Weinberg. He is a well renowned appellate attorney in Boston ! They brought him on to help with the appeal..if necessary!
Y'all
Replay crew ❤
SPICY!! Yes!!
Replay crew today!
Can you please explain how Keri Morrissey still has a job-- especially still on the Gutierrez case now??
Is there always a % of observers that believe the defendant is guilty, no matter what the evidence shows?
Oh, come on a disgraced officer… who could be more trustworthy in Canton?!? 😂
Replay
No wonder AJ and Ms Little weren't there in person. Must have expected the very short hearing.
Not worth flying from LA for.
Emily Lost greetings from Germany we love you and you're show
Don’t they have the right to request a new judge?? 👩⚖️
The defense has the right. They asked before the first trial. But the judge gets to decide the motion, so 🤷🏼♀️
EDB: This is going to be a short stream today + 1:58:14 later =
Good day 😊
That is short for EDB. 😂
Practically short form content at this length 😂
I don't think I'm completely clueless, couldn't this 5-minute scheduling meeting have been resolved via Skype? Zoom? Teams? IDK...maybe we will get a real housewives of Canton? Just seemed a bit outrageous with security, flights etc just for this. BUT, what do I know?
Also, I am wondering if the last jury feel as if their deliberations didn't matter. We know that she was found not guilty on some & it seems to be discredited imo
That's what they said. In the eyes of the court, they made no decision. They were unable to reach a verdict. They did not fill out the forms. So technically, we don't know anything. We know they couldn't reach a verdict.
wow first commenter?!? i have never been first here!! -- also!!!!!! please do NOT tell me that dude on Karens team is taking AJs place... ill cry. Watching him in trial is incredible. Poor Karen this has taken over her life....
No that lawyer filed those motions because of all the fuckery with the jury . She was not guilty on charges 1&3 … Her team couldn’t file the motions, legally
Nope, AJ was on Zoom because he had a previous commitment in Los Angeles today.
Replay crew in da howze
What's a MLS?
Masters of legal science I believe?
How do you become a member for a gifted membership? ❤️❤️❤️