Nice but oversimplified. let me explain: you don't go from physical servers to vm to cloud, you go from vm to infra virtualization with kubernetes and containers instread of vm. Also you don't go from Agile to DevOps, Agile organises also the work of business analysts and in some respects, business itself (and don't forget the users!) Agile is broader than DevOps which concerns only developpers and system administration (build & run). also people don't necessarily choose the cloud, many companies have on premises infra, or run a bit local and other services in a cloud. reality is much more complex and diverse than your diagram, although you have a point that infra management, software architecture and organizational principles go together.
Agree. VM's and containers are both intrinsic to today's cloud architecture. VM's will eventually be replaced (or made more efficient) through containers. In my world, RHOS namespace = VM
Actually, Cloud suffices, as Containers are a mechanism similar to VMs, not the overall infrastructure itself....The confusion her is in putting VMs as an Infrastructure transition from physical servers which is an insufficient analogy
![[Full Episode] The Restaurant War Thailand ศึกพ่อค้าซ่าแม่ค้าแซ่บ Episode 2 | 29 ก.ย. 67](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/r3lfLNH6Ke4/mqdefault.jpg)
Beautifully explained, simplicity is the ultimate sophistication!
000p
Nice but oversimplified. let me explain: you don't go from physical servers to vm to cloud, you go from vm to infra virtualization with kubernetes and containers instread of vm. Also you don't go from Agile to DevOps, Agile organises also the work of business analysts and in some respects, business itself (and don't forget the users!) Agile is broader than DevOps which concerns only developpers and system administration (build & run). also people don't necessarily choose the cloud, many companies have on premises infra, or run a bit local and other services in a cloud. reality is much more complex and diverse than your diagram, although you have a point that infra management, software architecture and organizational principles go together.
Indeed! To do this in detail, I'd struggle to fit it into a reasonably sized book let alone a quick video.
@@ericminick1700 I find this degree of details just perfect for the larger part of apps dev community . Thanks
love the way how you present it.
[Infrastructure] --> Physical Servers ----> VM ----> Cloud & Containers ??
Agree. VM's and containers are both intrinsic to today's cloud architecture. VM's will eventually be replaced (or made more efficient) through containers. In my world, RHOS namespace = VM
Really enjoyed and you explained in a efficient and simplified way . Great Thanks
Great video can u make smth on mainframe app mordenization ?
I like this overview so much. A fantastic explanation.
Thanks!
Guys, can you come up with some case studies over app modernization?
I have just seen this video; just excellent. The simplicity comes from deep experience, this is felt easily.
Thank you for the feedback, Loopaal! 🙏
Fantastic, how you simplify it. Keep creating short and very useful videos like that. Good job!
Thank you!
💙❤️🤎
Better to upgrade your old system, as maintaining old code is a burden on a daily basis.
pretty good way of explaining AM.
great explanation!
Nice summary
Good one. On the infra side for microservices, it shoud be containers, cloud is one of the options there.
It's difficult in a short video. Things like Functions as a Service are also appropriate here and the connection to containers isn't always obvious.
Actually, Cloud suffices, as Containers are a mechanism similar to VMs, not the overall infrastructure itself....The confusion her is in putting VMs as an Infrastructure transition from physical servers which is an insufficient analogy
Good post
Excelent presentation. Simple and clear