Pariniṣpanna is can not be a higher existence, because if you say higher, than you create an hierarchy, when one is more important than the other, whitch is a form of substantialization (essentailism). Also, Pariniṣpanna is not about ''apprehending things as they are in themselves''. With Pariniṣpanna first of all, there is no apprehention, because the object does not have an essence for it to be apprehended, second of all things can not be as they are in themselves, because that again is essentializing the objects of consciousness => that would negate sunyata = the lack on intrinsic existence / the lack of things being in themselves in any way. Things don't have a way of being in reality/ultimately = things are interdependent (pratityasamutpada) = they get their conventional existence through relation, not through essence. Be very careful with the words used to convey the teaching.
Yes I'm with you. Jai durga ma
good
Good communication skill great voice and conceptual clearity
Pariniṣpanna is can not be a higher existence, because if you say higher, than you create an hierarchy, when one is more important than the other, whitch is a form of substantialization (essentailism). Also, Pariniṣpanna is not about ''apprehending things as they are in themselves''. With Pariniṣpanna first of all, there is no apprehention, because the object does not have an essence for it to be apprehended, second of all things can not be as they are in themselves, because that again is essentializing the objects of consciousness => that would negate sunyata = the lack on intrinsic existence / the lack of things being in themselves in any way. Things don't have a way of being in reality/ultimately = things are interdependent (pratityasamutpada) = they get their conventional existence through relation, not through essence. Be very careful with the words used to convey the teaching.
Thank you. But i still didn't understand.
Can anyone explain in easy language?
Lecture should be in few word with key information.
Madhyamika regard
existence and nonxistence as coventially "true".
Bad pronunciation of Sanskrit