sir as u said that recording without consnt wont be taken as an evidence. but we have seen that sometimes some things are recoded secretly then those recordings are used as evidence...how come they are right and this is wrong?
Phone tapping or call recording done by authorities is done through the consent of either one of person involved in conversation or 3rd party consent that is the telecom service providers
Read PUCL vs UOI 1997 case where phone tapping was said to violate art 21 and 19 but can be done under 19(2) reasonable restrictions plus read in context with puttusway case judgement of necessity legality and proposationality for breach of privacy
@@VikasKotvaliya-g6h iconic m mentor milta h or all gs books aapke address pr deliver ki jati h sare notes pdf milte h Or Plus main sirf classes or notes pdf apki milte h vo bhi bs email ID pr
![[Live สด] การออกรางวัลสลากกินแบ่งรัฐบาล งวดวันที่ 16 ธันวาคม 2567](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/dNTiBBthKgQ/mqdefault.jpg)
🎯[Unacademy Pratishtha Offer Ends Tonight] Free 9 Months of Subs on purchase of 9 Months of subs + Flat 50% off: unacademy.com/goal/upsc-civil-services-examination-ias-preparation/KSCGY/subscribe?plan_type=plus&referral_code=SIDLIVE
For 9 Months: Free 9 Month Extensions
For 12 Months: Free 12 Month Extensions
For 18 Months: Free 18 Month Extensions
🎁 [Spin the wheel & win Amazing Rewards, Ends Tonight] Rewards for EVERY LEARNER: unacademy.com/event/rewards/pratishtha
Thankyou sir
Ocean of knowledge ❤
Sir please bring more recent judgement for prelims..❤❤❤nice explanation
wonderfull explanation sir
Thank you sir ❤
I am a student of AMU 🙌
❤
sir as u said that recording without consnt wont be taken as an evidence. but we have seen that sometimes some things are recoded secretly then those recordings are used as evidence...how come they are right and this is wrong?
Phone tapping or call recording done by authorities is done through the consent of either one of person involved in conversation or 3rd party consent that is the telecom service providers
Read PUCL vs UOI 1997 case where phone tapping was said to violate art 21 and 19 but can be done under 19(2) reasonable restrictions plus read in context with puttusway case judgement of necessity legality and proposationality for breach of privacy
9 moths course ka price kitna hai?
Iconic ka 50000 k something and plus ka 26000 k something
@@PriyaRajput-lh5ig dono mein kya different hai?
@@VikasKotvaliya-g6h iconic m mentor milta h or all gs books aapke address pr deliver ki jati h sare notes pdf milte h
Or
Plus main sirf classes or notes pdf apki milte h vo bhi bs email ID pr
😂😂 supreme....hhhh
Nyay ka pta nhi...Sirf judgment adjo
@@verman4024 shut up
THANKS SIR