CCA Hydro (1000) vs FIIO FH9

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 8

  • @РоманБабійчук-б3п
    @РоманБабійчук-б3п 15 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    We need: PULA ANVIL144, JUZEAR Dragonfly 81T, AFUL Performer 5+2 , CKLVX D62, Binary Dynaquattro🙏

  • @Watman2526
    @Watman2526 15 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    CCA is fantastic.
    Listening by Rhapsody

  • @SileDevil
    @SileDevil 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    the hydronsounds surprisingly good in the layering department, however why does some sounds are tilted tp the elft channel? channel imbalance or just sharp imaging? Laso vocals on the FH9 are much better.

    • @dragonsbreath8653
      @dragonsbreath8653 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I doubt that the sound after recording is reliable, as the microphone can alter the sound of sound. Recording and actual listening can differ. The author has not answered whether there are differences between recording and listening. If there are, then listening with headphones on this channel might mislead us. I tried recording my headphones with a Fifine microphone and the sound on my ears was different from the recorded sound.

    • @SileDevil
      @SileDevil 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @dragonsbreath8653 he is using a coupler

    • @dragonsbreath8653
      @dragonsbreath8653 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@SileDevil What is the connector? By the way, is it not an IEC-711 headphone frequency tester? Do I understand correctly that recording of IEM headphones that we listen to via TH-cam is reliable and we will hear exactly the same sound with our own ears?

    • @Hijynx87
      @Hijynx87 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@dragonsbreath8653 No, it's moreso the general idea of how they sound and the differences between each iem.

  • @Shirtlessaudiophile
    @Shirtlessaudiophile 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Typical fiio dry treble